new-media file along with user information to a user media publishing
`
`website."
`
`In view of the above arguments, applicant submits that even if Kennedy, King,
`
`Shiatsu and Pryor are combined as suggested in the office action, there is no expectation
`
`of satisfying applicant's claim 1. Claim 1 is therefore non-obvious over Kennedy, in view
`
`of King, in view of Shiatsu, further in view of Pryor. Applicant therefore respectfully
`
`requests that the rejection of Claim 1 under 35 Pre-AlA U.S.C. 103(a) be reconsidered
`
`and withdrawn.
`
`Claims 3, 4 and 9 are dependent on claim 1. Applicant therefore respectfully
`
`requests that the rejection of Claims 3, 4 and 9 under 35 Pre-AlA U.S.C. 103(a) be
`
`reconsidered and withdrawn.
`
`Next, the office action states: "Claims 10, 12-13, 19, 21-26, 32-38 are rejected under
`
`35 Pre-AlA U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Kennedy-King-Lin-Pryor
`
`further in view of Ihara US 20120089538."
`
`Lin Arguments
`
`Argument 1: Digital camera device receiving a data transfer request from the
`
`cellular phone for the transfer of the new-media file created in the digital camera
`
`device (a) after the short-range paired wireless connection is established between the
`
`digital camera device and the cellular phone AND (b) before receiving the data
`
`transfer request (Applicant) vs NO data transfer request (Lin)
`
`29
`
`Canon Exhibit 1002, Page 355
`
`

`

`EstabHshtng a short -range R!Jir~9 · .. vire~ess
`
`Mobile
`Device
`
`st-;ort-r;_:::r:ge
`)/, .. ~re!e.s.s
`capability
`
`Timing of Acquiring media
`is e.etnre
`Data Transfer request is received
`
`Recehte request tG
`tr a psf er the ·alre.ady
`creat.ed'NewMedta
`Fife over the paired
`corHleLt~o ns.
`
`Rece~veTheNew
`
`from p.aked Data
`Capture Oev~ce and
`Store the New
`Mediafi!e
`
`short-raPge
`V•}ke!ess
`capability
`
`Lin State Machine
`
`Mobile
`
`short-r;;nge
`
`Timing for Acquiring
`data is After
`rece:-..•lng the
`''Start Command"
`
`30
`
`Canon Exhibit 1002, Page 356
`
`

`

`Claim 1 discloses that the digital camera device receives the data transfer request
`
`from the cellular phone for transferring the new-media file created in the digital camera
`
`device (a) after the short-range paired wireless connection is established between the
`
`digital camera device and the cellular phone AND (b) before receiving the data transfer
`
`request from the cellular phone. The cellular phone initiates the transfer of the new(cid:173)
`
`media file from the digital camera device to the cellular phone (see page 7, lines 5-7 of
`
`applicant's original application: "The client application 203 then initiates the transfer of
`
`the captured data, the multimedia content, and the associated files.").
`
`Lin teaches in paragraph [0020] that the local Bluetooth device 150 can
`
`automatically send out a start command SC for the Bluetooth earphone 100 to start with
`
`the process of measuring body temperature in order to receive the body temperature value
`
`T by the Bluetooth earphone 100."
`
`Paragraph [0023] of Lin discloses: "A Bluetooth earphone activates a temperature
`
`measuring procedure according to the start command inputted by a local Bluetooth device
`
`(step 310)."
`
`Paragraph [0024] of Lin discloses: "Set the mobile phone to send a start command
`
`at a certain time to activate the Bluetooth earphone to execute body temperature
`
`measuring (step 420)."
`
`Paragraph [0025] of Lin discloses: "the mobile phone automatically activates a
`
`pre-set timing for the Bluetooth earphone to measure body temperature (step 520)."
`
`Further, Paragraph [0020] of Lin discloses: "Take the application of the Bluetooth
`
`mobile phone for example, a department director can choose to send a text message of
`
`measuring body temperature to the colleagues. After having received the text message,
`
`the mobile phone will issue a start command SC activating the Bluetooth earphone 100
`
`to measure the body temperature."
`
`31
`
`Canon Exhibit 1002, Page 357
`
`

`

`Therefore, in Lin, the measurement of temperatures by the earphone is triggered
`
`by the text message received by the cellular phone from an external source (the Director),
`
`which in tum causes the cellular phone to issue a start command to the earphone. In
`
`contrast, in applicant's method, the capture of the new-media by the digital camera
`
`device is NOT triggered by receiving a Text Message on the cellular phone from an
`
`external source. Further, in Lin, the start command triggers "temperature
`
`measurement" by the earphone. Therefore it is NOT a "data transfer" request from
`
`the cellular phone to the ear phone for the temperature measurements that were measured
`
`by the earphone (a) after the short-range paired wireless connection is established
`
`between the ear phone and the cellular phone AND (b) before receiving the data
`
`transfer request.
`
`In Lin's disclosure, the Director is the Master that sends a text message to the
`
`cellular phone and the cellular phone in tum sends "Start Command to the earphone to
`
`capture temperatures". In applicant's method, the request is for the new-data that has
`
`been captured by the digital camera device before receiving the data transfer
`
`request.
`
`In summary, in paragraphs [0020] [0023] [0024] [0025] Lin does not disclose that
`
`the earphone performs the following steps:
`
`(a) Establishing the short-range paired wireless connection with the cellular
`
`phone,
`
`(b) Acquiring the temperature measurements after establishing the short-range
`
`paired wireless connection, and
`
`(c) Receiving the data transfer request from the cellular phone that initiates the
`
`transfer of the temperature measurements, where the temperature
`
`measurements were performed (i) after the short-range paired wireless
`
`32
`
`Canon Exhibit 1002, Page 358
`
`

`

`connection is established between the ear phone and the cellular phone AND
`
`(ii) before receiving the data transfer request."
`
`Combination of Kennedy-King-Lin-Pryor-Ihara
`
`Applicant submits that Kennedy, in view of King, in view of Lin, further in view
`
`of Pryor does not teach all the limitations of claim 1.
`
`As illustrated earlier in this response, Kennedy does not teach or suggest that a
`
`short-range paired wireless connection is established between the digital camera device
`
`33
`
`Canon Exhibit 1002, Page 359
`
`

`

`and the cellular phone, and ONLY THEN the digital camera device acquires "new(cid:173)
`
`media". It has also been illustrated earlier in this response that King does not teach or
`
`suggest that the digital camera device cryptographically authenticates the identity of
`
`the cellular phone.
`
`Applicant therefore respectfully submits that Kennedy, in view of King, in view
`
`of Lin, further in view of Pryor does not teach or suggest the following limitations in
`
`claim 1:
`
`"establishing a short-range paired wireless connection between the digital camera
`
`device and the cellular phone, wherein establishing the short-range paired
`
`wireless connection comprises, the digital camera device cryptographically
`
`authenticating identity of the cellular phone;"
`
`"acquiring new-media, wherein the new-media is acquired after establishing the
`
`short-range paired wireless connection between the digital camera device and the
`
`cellular phone;"
`
`Further, in the earlier part of this response, it has been illustrated that neither
`
`Kennedy nor Lin teach or suggest that the digital camera device receives the data transfer
`
`request from the cellular phone for transferring the new-media file that was created in the
`
`digital camera device (a) after the short-range paired wireless connection is established
`
`between the digital camera device and the cellular phone AND (b) before receiving the
`
`data transfer request from the cellular phone.
`
`Applicant therefore respectfully submits that Kennedy, in view of King, in view
`
`of Lin, further in view of Pryor does not teach or suggest the following limitation in
`
`claim 1:
`
`"receiving a data transfer request initiated by a mobile software application on the
`
`cellular phone, over the established short-range paired wireless connection,
`
`34
`
`Canon Exhibit 1002, Page 360
`
`

`

`wherein the data transfer request is for the new-media file, and wherein the new(cid:173)
`
`media file was created in the digital camera device before receiving the data
`
`transfer request;"
`
`Further, in the earlier part of this response, it has been illustrated that Kennedy
`
`does not disclose transfer of the new-media to the cellular phone, over the established
`
`short-range paired wireless connection.
`
`Further, in the earlier part of this response, it has been illustrated that neither
`
`Kennedy nor Pryor teach or suggest uploading of new-media received from the digital
`
`camera device by the cellular phone along with the user information to the user media
`
`publishing website using HTTP.
`
`Therefore, Kennedy in view of King in view of Lin further in view of Pryor does
`
`not teach or suggest the following limitation in amended claim 1:
`
`"transferring the new-media file to the cellular phone, over the established short(cid:173)
`
`range paired wireless connection, wherein the cellular phone is configured to
`
`receive the new-media file, wherein the cellular phone is configured to store the
`
`received new-media file in a non-volatile memory device of the cellular phone,
`
`and wherein the cellular phone is configured to use HTTP to upload the received
`
`new-media file along with user information to a user media publishing
`
`website."
`
`In view of the above arguments, applicant submits that even if Kennedy, King,
`
`Lin and Pryor are combined as suggested in the office action, there is no expectation of
`
`satisfying applicant's claim 1. Claim 1 is therefore non-obvious over Kennedy, in view of
`
`King, in view of Lin, further in view of Pryor.
`
`Page 11, lines 4-10 of applicant's original application recite as follows: "The data
`
`transfer protocol module 201c of the digital data capture device 201 transfers the
`
`35
`
`Canon Exhibit 1002, Page 361
`
`

`

`captured data, the multimedia content, and the associated files to the client
`
`application 203. The data storage module 203d stores the captured data, the multimedia
`
`content, and the associated files on the mobile device 202. The user may also set
`
`preferences on the mobile device 202 using the GUI 203e of the client application
`
`203."
`
`Page 11, lines 27-29 of applicant's original application recite as follows:". The
`
`user may also configure the client application 203 to automatically delete the data, the
`
`multimedia content, and the associated files ... "
`
`From the above paragraphs, it is clear that in applicant's disclosure the GUI on
`
`the cellular phone facilitates:
`
`(a) receiving of the created new-media file and the created associated file from
`
`the digital camera device, and
`
`(b) deleting the created new-media file and the created associated file.
`
`The office action on page 8 states that Ihara teaches that it is well known to have a
`
`system to include graphical user interface GUI (see Ihara paragraphs [0076-0077] "GUI")
`
`in order to make uploading data more efficient (see Ihara paragraphs [0076- 0077]).
`
`However, Kennedy, King, Lin, Pryor and Ihara, either alone or in combination
`
`do not teach or suggest that the GUI is for the new-media file and the associated file
`
`"received" by the cellular phone from the digital camera device over the established
`short-range paired wireless connection.
`
`Applicant therefore respectfully submits that Kennedy, in view of King, in view
`
`of Lin, in view of Pryor, further in view of Ihara does not teach or suggest the following
`
`limitations in claims 10 and 21:
`
`36
`
`Canon Exhibit 1002, Page 362
`
`

`

`" .... provide a graphical user interface (GUI) for the received new-media file."
`
`Applicant therefore respectfully submits that Kennedy, in view of King, in view
`
`of Lin, in view of Pryor, further in view of Ihara does not teach or suggest the following
`
`limitations in claims 12 and 22:
`
`" .... provide a graphical user interface (GUI) for the received associated file."
`
`Applicant therefore respectfully submits that Kennedy, in view of King, in view
`
`of Lin, in view of Pryor, further in view of Ihara does not teach or suggest the following
`
`limitations in claims 40 and 47:
`
`" .... GUI is for the received new-media file ... "
`
`Note: The received new-media file and the associated file are files received by the
`
`cellular phone from the digital camera device over the short-range paired wireless
`
`connection.
`
`Further, Kennedy, King, Lin, Pryor and Ihara, either alone or in combination do
`
`not teach or suggest that the GUI is for deleting the created new-media file and the
`
`created associated file.
`
`Applicant therefore respectfully submits that Kennedy, in view of King, in view
`
`of Lin, in view of Pryor, further in view of Ihara does not teach or suggest the
`
`following limitation in claims 19:
`
`" .... receive input from the graphical user interface (GUI) to delete the created
`
`new-media file."
`
`37
`
`Canon Exhibit 1002, Page 363
`
`

`

`Applicant therefore respectfully submits that Kennedy, in view of King, in view
`
`of Lin, in view of Pryor, further in view of Ihara does not teach or suggest the following
`
`limitation in claims 45:
`
`" .... receive input from the GUI to delete the created associated file."
`
`Applicant therefore respectfully submits that Kennedy, in view of King, in view
`
`of Lin, in view of Pryor, further in view of Ihara does not teach or suggest the following
`
`limitation in claim 23:
`
`" .... delete the created new-media file based on input received from the
`
`graphical user interface (GUI)."
`
`Applicant therefore respectfully submits that Kennedy, in view of King, in view
`
`of Lin, in view of Pryor, further in view of Ihara does not teach or suggest the following
`
`limitation in claim 46:
`
`" .... delete the created associated file based on input received from the GUI."
`
`Applicant therefore respectfully submits that Kennedy, in view of King, in view
`
`of Lin, in view of Pryor, further in view of Ihara does not teach or suggest the following
`
`limitations in claim 40 and 47:
`
`" .... GUI is for the received new-media file and to delete the created new media
`
`file."
`
`Furthermore, since the combination of Kennedy-King-Lin-Pryor does not teach
`
`all the limitations in Claim 1, the combination of Kennedy-King-Lin-Pryor-Ihara also
`
`does not teach all the limitations of Claim 1. Claims 10, 21 and 32 are synonymous with
`
`Claim 1. Therefore the combination of Kennedy-King-Lin-Pryor-Ihara does not teach all
`
`the limitations in Claims 10, 21 and 32. Claims 10, 21 and 32 are therefore non-obvious
`
`38
`
`Canon Exhibit 1002, Page 364
`
`

`

`over Kennedy, in view of King, in view of Lin, in view of Pryor, further in view of Ihara.
`
`Applicant therefore respectfully requests that the rejection of Claims 10, 21 and 32 under
`
`35 Pre-AlA U.S.C. 103(a) be reconsidered and withdrawn.
`
`Claims 12, 13, 19 and 37 are dependent on claim 10. Claims 38 and 22-26 are
`
`dependent on claim 21. Claims 33-36 are dependent on claim 32. Since claims 10, 21 and
`
`32 are non-obvious over Kennedy, in view of King, in view of Lin, in view of Pryor,
`
`further in view of Ihara, dependent claims 12, 13, 19, 22-26, and 33-38 are also non(cid:173)
`
`obvious over Kennedy, in view of King, in view of Lin, in view of Pryor, further in view
`
`of Ihara. Applicant therefore respectfully requests that the rejection of dependent claims
`
`12, 13, 19, 22-26, and 33-38 under 35 Pre-AlA U.S.C. 103(a) be reconsidered and
`
`withdrawn.
`
`Next, the office action states: "Claims 3-4, 9, 12-13, 19, 21-26, 32-38, and 40-47 are
`
`rejected for similar reason as stated above."
`
`In response to the above rejection, applicant submits that Kennedy-King-Lin(cid:173)
`
`Pryor further in view of Ihara do not teach all the limitations in claims 1 and 10. Claims
`
`21 and 32 are synonymous with claims 1 and 10. Since the combination of Kennedy(cid:173)
`
`King-Lin-Pryor-Ihara does not teach all the limitations in Claims 1 and 10, the
`
`combination of Kennedy-King-Lin-Pryor-Ihara also does not teach all the limitations of
`
`Claims 21 and 32. Claims 21 and 32 are therefore non-obvious over Kennedy, in view of
`
`King, in view of Lin, in view of Pryor, further in view of Ihara. Applicant therefore
`
`respectfully requests that the rejection of Claims 21 and 32 under 35 Pre-AlA U.S.C.
`
`103(a) be reconsidered and withdrawn.
`
`Claims 3, 4, 9 and 40 are dependent on claim 1. Claims 12, 13, 19, 37, 39, 43 and
`
`45 are dependent on claim 10. Claims 38, 41, 44, 46, and 22-26 are dependent on claim
`
`21. Claims 42, 47, and 33-36 are dependent on claim 32. Applicant therefore respectfully
`
`requests that the rejection of claims 3, 4, 9, 12, 13, 19, 22-26, 33-38, and 40-47 under 35
`
`Pre-AlA U.S.C. 103(a) be reconsidered and withdrawn.
`
`39
`
`Canon Exhibit 1002, Page 365
`
`

`

`For the reasons stated above, applicant submits that even if the Six prior art
`
`references i.e., Kennedy, King, Lin, Pryor, Shiotsu, and Ihara are combined as
`
`suggested in the office action, the combination still does not teach or suggest all the
`
`limitations in applicant's claims. Therefore, applicant respectfully requests the
`
`rejection of claims under 35 U.S.C. 103(A) be reconsidered and withdrawn.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Applicant respectfully requests that a timely Notice of Allowance be issued in this
`
`case. In the interest of compact prosecution, if the prosecution of the application can be
`
`advanced or if a claim may be made potentially allowable by an Examiner's amendment,
`
`applicant requests Examiner Nooristany to call the undersigned with the proposed
`
`amendment.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/a tankha/
`Ashok Tankha
`Attorney For Applicant
`Reg. No. 33,802
`
`Date: November 10, 2015
`
`Correspondence Address
`Lipton Weinberger & Husick
`36 Greenleigh Drive
`Sewell, NJ 08080
`Fax: 856-374-0246
`Phone: 856-266-5145
`Email: ash@ ipprocure.com
`
`40
`
`Canon Exhibit 1002, Page 366
`
`

`

`Doc Code: A.NE.AFCP
`Document Description: After Final Consideration Pilot Program Request
`
`CERTIFICATION AND REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION UNDER THE
`AFTER FINAL CONSIDERATION PILOT PROGRAM 2.0
`
`PTO/SB/434 (05 13)
`
`Practitioner Docket No.:
`Cellspin_04Con1 O_US
`First Named Inventor:
`Gurvinder Singh
`
`Application No.:
`14/533,104
`Title:
`Automatic Multimedia Upload For Publishing Data and Multimedia Content
`
`Filing Date:
`11/05/2014
`
`APPLICANT HEREBY CERTIFIES THE FOLLOWING AND REQUESTS CONSIDERATION UNDER THE AFTER FINAL CONSIDERATION PILOT
`PROGRAM 2.0 (AFCP 2.0) OF THE ACCOMPANYING RESPONSE UNDER 37 CFR 1.116.
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`•
`•
`
`The above-identified application is (i) an original utility, plant, or design nonprovisional application filed under
`35 U.S. C. 111(a) [a continuing application (e.g., a continuation or divisional application) is filed under 35 U.S. C. 111(a) and is
`eligible under (i)], or (ii) an international application that has entered the national stage in compliance with 35 U.S. C. 371(c).
`
`The above-identified application contains an outstanding final rejection.
`
`Submitted herewith is a response under 37 CFR 1.116 to the outstanding final rejection. The response includes an
`amendment to at least one independent claim, and the amendment does not broaden the scope of the independent claim in
`any aspect.
`
`This certification and request for consideration under AFCP 2.0 is the only AFCP 2.0 certification and request filed in
`response to the outstanding final rejection.
`
`Applicant is willing and available to participate in any interview requested by the examiner concerning the present response.
`
`This certification and request is being filed electronically using the Office's electronic filing system (EFS-Web).
`
`Any fees that would be necessary consistent with current practice concerning responses after final rejection under 37 CFR
`1.116, e.g., extension of time fees, are being concurrently filed herewith. [There is no additional fee required to request
`consideration under AFCP 2.0.]
`
`By filing this certification and request, applicant acknowledges the following:
`
`o
`
`Reissue applications and reexamination proceedings are not eligible to participate in AFCP 2.0 .
`The examiner will verify that the AFCP 2.0 submission is compliant, i.e., that the requirements of the program have been met
`(see items 1 to 7 above). For compliant submissions:
`The examiner will review the response under 37 CFR 1.116 to determine if additional search and/or consideration
`o
`(i) is necessitated by the amendment and (ii) could be completed within the time allotted under AFCP 2.0. If
`additional search and/or consideration is required but cannot be completed within the allotted time, the examiner
`will process the submission consistent with current practice concerning responses after final rejection under
`37 CFR 1.116, e.g., by mailing an advisory action.
`If the examiner determines that the amendment does not necessitate additional search and/or consideration, or if
`the examiner determines that additional search and/or consideration is required and could be completed within
`the allotted time, then the examiner will consider whether the amendment places the application in condition for
`allowance (after completing the additional search and/or consideration, if required). If the examiner determines
`that the amendment does not place the application in condition for allowance, then the examiner will contact the
`applicant and request an interview.
`•
`The interview will be conducted by the examiner, and if the examiner does not have negotiation
`authority, a primary examiner and/or supervisory patent examiner will also participate.
`If the applicant declines the interview, or if the interview cannot be scheduled within ten (10) calendar
`days from the date that the examiner first contacts the applicant, then the examiner will proceed
`consistent with current practice concerning responses after final rejection under 37 CFR 1.116.
`
`•
`
`Signature
`/a tankha/
`Name
`(Print/Typed) Ashok Tankha
`
`Date
`11/10/2015
`Practitioner
`Registration No.
`
`33802
`Note: This form must be signed in accordance with 37 CFR 1.33. See 37 CFR 1.4(d) for signature requirements and certifications. Submit multiple
`forms if more than one signature is required, see below*.
`
`n *Total of
`
`forms are submitted.
`
`Canon Exhibit 1002, Page 367
`
`

`

`Privacy Act Statement
`
`The Privacy Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-579) requires that you be given certain information in connection with your
`submission of the attached form related to a patent application or patent. Accordingly, pursuant to the
`requirements of the Act, please be advised that: (1) the general authority for the collection of this information is
`35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2); (2) furnishing of the information solicited is voluntary; and (3) the principal purpose for which
`the information is used by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is to process and/or examine your submission
`related to a patent application or patent.
`If you do not furnish the requested information, the U.S. Patent and
`Trademark Office may not be able to process and/or examine your submission, which may result in termination
`of proceedings or abandonment of the application or expiration of the patent.
`
`The information provided by you in this form will be subject to the following routine uses:
`
`1. The information on this form will be treated confidentially to the extent allowed under the Freedom of
`Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C 552a). Records from this system of
`records may be disclosed to the Department of Justice to determine whether disclosure of these
`records is required by the Freedom of Information Act.
`2. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, in the course of presenting
`evidence to a court, magistrate, or administrative tribunal, including disclosures to opposing counsel in
`the course of settlement negotiations.
`3. A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a Member of Congress
`submitting a request involving an individual, to whom the record pertains, when the individual has
`requested assistance from the Member with respect to the subject matter of the record.
`4. A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a contractor of the Agency
`having need for the information in order to perform a contract. Recipients of information shall be
`required to comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
`552a(m).
`5. A record related to an International Application filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty in this
`system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the International Bureau of the World
`Intellectual Property Organization, pursuant to the Patent Cooperation Treaty.
`6. A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to another federal agency for
`purposes of National Security review (35 U.S.C. 181) and for review pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act
`(42 U.S.C. 218(c)).
`7. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the Administrator, General
`Services, or his/her designee, during an inspection of records conducted by GSA as part of that
`agency's responsibility to recommend improvements in records management practices and programs,
`under authority of 44 U.S.C. 2904 and 2906. Such disclosure shall be made in accordance with the
`GSA regulations governing inspection of records for this purpose, and any other relevant (i.e., GSA or
`Commerce) directive. Such disclosure shall not be used to make determinations about individuals.
`8. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the public after either
`publication of the application pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 122(b) or issuance of a patent pursuant to 35
`U .S.C. 151. Further, a record may be disclosed, subject to the limitations of 37 CFR 1.14, as a routine
`use, to the public if the record was filed in an application which became abandoned or in which the
`proceedings were terminated and which application is referenced by either a published application, an
`application open to public inspection or an issued patent.
`9. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a Federal, State, or local
`law enforcement agency, if the USPTO becomes aware of a violation or potential violation of law or
`regulation.
`
`Canon Exhibit 1002, Page 368
`
`

`

`Electronic Acknowledgement Receipt
`
`EFSID:
`
`Application Number:
`
`24045689
`
`14533104
`
`International Application Number:
`
`Confirmation Number:
`
`7437
`
`Title of Invention:
`
`Automatic Multimedia Upload For Publishing Data And Multimedia Content
`
`First Named Inventor/Applicant Name:
`
`Gurvinder Singh
`
`NJ
`
`08080
`
`Ashok Tankha
`
`6 Green leigh drive
`
`- 3
`
`8562665145
`
`- S
`
`ewell
`us
`
`ash@ipprocurement.com
`
`Correspondence Address:
`
`Filer:
`
`Ashok Tankha
`
`Filer Authorized By:
`
`Attorney Docket Number:
`
`Cei1Spin_04Con1 O_US
`
`Receipt Date:
`
`Filing Date:
`
`TimeStamp:
`
`1 0-NOV-2015
`
`05-NOV-2014
`
`22:08:34
`
`Application Type:
`
`Utility under 35 USC 111 (a)
`
`Payment information:
`
`Submitted with Payment
`
`File Listing:
`
`I no
`
`Canon Exhibit 1002, Page 369
`
`

`

`Document
`Number
`
`Document Description
`
`File Name
`
`File Size( Bytes)/
`Message Digest
`
`Multi
`Part /.zip
`
`Pages
`(ifappl.)
`
`1
`
`Transmittal Letter
`
`Cellspin_04Con1 O_US_ Transmi
`ttai_Letter_sb0021.pdf
`
`262891
`
`ea35 1 dd2ad7d8fb241 Ofl 00f3b77a065638
`7948c
`
`no
`
`2
`
`Warnings:
`
`Information:
`
`2
`
`Amend ment/Req. Reconsideration-After Cei1Spin_04Con1 O_US_Respon
`Non-Final Reject
`se.pdf
`
`1135209
`
`25 bbe9b4 5 d 87fc 4 7f14 5 2d4 24 29 7802814 9
`90060
`
`no
`
`40
`
`Warnings:
`
`Information:
`
`3
`
`After Final Consideration Program
`Request
`
`Cellspin_04Con1 O_US_Pilot_Pr
`ogramme_Req_sb0434.pdf
`
`226017
`
`28363e92fbcfb63ea8ac6e499f8cd048e34a
`7bcd
`
`no
`
`2
`
`Warnings:
`
`Information:
`
`Total Files Size (in bytes)
`
`1624117
`
`This Acknowledgement Receipt evidences receipt on the noted date by the USPTO of the indicated documents,
`characterized by the applicant, and including page counts, where applicable. It serves as evidence of receipt similar to a
`Post Card, as described in MPEP 503.
`
`New A~~lications Under 35 U.S.C. 111
`If a new application is being filed and the application includes the necessary components for a filing date (see 37 CFR
`1.53(b)-(d) and MPEP 506), a Filing Receipt (37 CFR 1.54) will be issued in due course and the date shown on this
`Acknowledgement Receipt will establish the filing date of the application.
`
`National Stage of an International A~~lication under 35 U.S.C. 371
`If a timely submission to enter the national stage of an international application is compliant with the conditions of 35
`U.S.C. 371 and other applicable requirements a Form PCT/DO/E0/903 indicating acceptance of the application as a
`national stage submission under 35 U.S.C. 371 will be issued in addition to the Filing Receipt, in due course.
`
`New International A~~lication Filed with the USPTO as a Receiving Office
`If a new international application is being filed and the international application includes the necessary components for
`an international filing date (see PCT Article 11 and MPEP 181 0), a Notification of the International Application Number
`and of the International Filing Date (Form PCT/R0/1 OS) will be issued in due course, subject to prescriptions concerning
`national security, and the date shown on this Acknowledgement Receipt will establish the international filing date of
`the application.
`
`Canon Exhibit 1002, Page 370
`
`

`

`Doc Code: TRAN.LET
`Document Description: Transmittal Letter
`
`PTO/SB/21 (07-09)
`Approved for use through 07/31/2012. OMB 0651-0031
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`TRANSMITTAL
`FORM
`
`(to be used for all correspondence after initial filing)
`
`Total Number of Pages in This Submission
`
`Filing Date
`
`First Named Inventor
`
`Art Unit
`
`Examiner Name
`
`11/05/2014
`
`Gurvinder Singh
`
`2415
`
`Nooris1any, Sulaiman
`
`Attorney Docket Number
`
`Cellspin_04Con1 o_us
`
`ENCLOSURES
`
`(Check all that apply)
`
`D
`
`Fee Transmittal Form
`
`Drawing(s)
`
`Fee Attached
`
`Amendment/Reply
`
`After Final
`
`Provisional Application
`
`Affidavits/declaration(s)
`
`Change of Correspondence Address
`
`Extension of Time Request
`
`D After Allowance Communication to TC
`D Appeal Communication to Board
`D Appeal Communication to TC
`D
`D Status Letter
`0
`
`of Appeals and Interferences
`
`(Appeal Notice, Brief, Reply Brief)
`
`Proprietary Information
`
`Other Enclosure(s) (please Identify
`below):
`2. Certification and request for consideration
`under the after final consideration pilot
`program 2.0, Form PTO/SB/434
`
`D
`D Licensing-related Papers
`D
`D Petition
`~
`D Petition to Convert to a
`~
`D Power of Attorney, Revocation
`D
`D Terminal Disclaimer
`D
`D Express Abandonment Request D Request for Refund
`D Information Disclosure Statement D CD, Number of CD(s)
`D Landscape Table on CD
`I Remarks
`I
`
`Document(s)
`
`D Certified Copy of Priority
`D Reply to Missing Parts/
`D Reply to Missing Parts
`
`Incomplete Application
`
`under 37 CFR 1.52 or 1.53
`
`Firm Name
`
`Signature
`
`Printed name
`
`Date
`
`'
`
`SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT, ATTORNEY, OR AGENT
`
`Lipton, Weinberger & Husick
`
`Ia tankha/
`
`Ashok Tankha
`
`11/10/2015
`
`I Reg. No. 133802
`
`CERTIFICATE OF TRANSMISSION/MAILING
`
`"""'
`
`I hereby certify that this correspondence is being facsimile transmitted to the USPTO or deposited with the United States Postal Service with
`sufficient postage as first class mail in an envelope addressed to: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 on
`the date shown below:
`Signature
`
`Ia tankha/
`
`~yped or printed name
`
`Ashok Tankha
`
`I Date 111/10/2015
`
`This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.5. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to
`process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.11 and1.14. This collection is estimated to 2 hours to complete, including
`gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments on the
`amount of time you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and
`Trademark Office, U.S. Department of Commerce, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS
`ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for