`571.272.7822
`
`Paper 21
`Entered: January 24, 2020
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`INTEL CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2019-00047
`Case IPR2019-00048
`Case IPR2019-00049
`Case IPR2019-00128
` Case IPR2019-001291
`Patent 9,154,356 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before DANIEL N. FISHMAN, MICHELLE N. WORMMEESTER, and
`AARON W. MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`WORMMEESTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of William E. Devitt
`37 U.S.C. § 42.10
`
`
`
`1 This Order addresses issues that are identical in each of the identified
`cases. We exercise our discretion to issue this Order to be filed in each case.
`The parties are not authorized to use this style heading in subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00047, IPR2019-00048, IPR2019-00049,
`IPR2019-00128, IPR2019-00129
`Patent 9,154,356 B2
`
`
`
`In each of the identified cases, Patent Owner has filed a motion for
`pro hac vice admission of William E. Devitt. Paper 20.2 Each motion is
`supported by a declaration of Mr. Devitt. Ex. 2028. Patent Owner asserts
`that “Petitioner does not oppose this motion.” Paper 20, 1.
`We have reviewed Patent Owner’s submissions and determine that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and that there is good
`cause to admit Mr. Devitt pro hac vice.
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s motion for pro hac vice admission of
`William E. Devitt in each of the identified proceedings is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Devitt is authorized to appear as
`back-up counsel for Patent Owner in the identified proceedings, but
`Mr. Devitt may not act as lead counsel;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel for the identified
`proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Devitt is to comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Devitt is subject to the Office’s
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO Rules
`of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.; and
`
`
`2 Paper and exhibit numbers refer to Case IPR2019-00047. Corresponding
`motions and declarations were filed in each of the cases.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00047, IPR2019-00048, IPR2019-00049,
`IPR2019-00128, IPR2019-00129
`Patent 9,154,356 B2
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that within ten business days Patent Owner
`shall file updated mandatory notices in the identified proceedings, pursuant
`to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3), providing updated information regarding back-up
`counsel.
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`David Cavanaugh
`John Hobgood
`Benjamin Fernandez
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LLP
`david.cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com
`john.hobgood@wilmerhale.com
`ben.fernandez@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`David Cochran
`Matthew Johnson
`Joseph Sauer
`Joshua Nightingale
`David Maiorana
`JONES DAY
`dcochran@jonesday.com
`mwjohnson@jonesday.com
`jmsauer@jonesday.com
`jrnightingale@jonesday.com
`dmaiorana@jonesday.com
`
`3
`
`