IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`13/590,423
`
`Confinnation No.
`
`9482
`
`Aleksandar Modrag Tasic
`
`August 21, 2012
`
`2631
`
`Khanh C. Tran
`
`121973
`
`23696
`
`RESPONSE
`
`Application No.
`
`Applicant
`
`Filed
`
`Art Unit
`
`Examiner
`
`Docket N o.
`
`Customer No.
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`Commissioner for Patents
`
`PO. Box 1450
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`Sir:
`
`In response to an Office Action dated August 1, 2014, please amend the above—identified
`
`application as follows:
`
`Amendments to the Claims are reflected in the listing of claims which begins on page 2
`
`of this paper.
`
`Remarks/Arguments begin on page 7 of this paper.
`
`Attorney Docket No. 121973
`Customer No. 23696
`
`INTEL 1017
`
`

`

`Serial No. 13/590,423
`
`Amendments to the Claims:
`
`Please note that all claims currently pending and under consideration in the referenced
`
`application are shown below. This listing of claims will replace all prior versions and listings of
`
`claims in the application.
`
`Listing of Claims:
`
`1. (Previously presented) An apparatus comprising:
`
`a first amplifier stage configured to receive and amplify an input radio frequency (RF)
`
`signal and provide a first output RF signal to a first load circuit when the first
`
`amplifier stage is enabled,
`
`the input RF signal employing carrier aggregation
`
`compiising transmissions sent on multiple carriers at different frequencies to a
`
`wireless device, the first output RF signal including at least a first cairier of the
`
`multiple carriers; and
`
`a second amplifier stage configured to receive and amplify the input RF signal and
`
`provide a second output RF signal
`
`to a second load circuit when the second
`
`amplifier stage is enabled, the second output RF signal including at least a second
`
`carrier of the multiple carriers different than the first carrier.
`
`2. (Original) The apparatus of claim I, the first amplifier stage comprising a first gain transistor
`
`coupled to a first cascode transistor, the second amplifier stage comprising a second gain
`
`transistor coupled to a second cascode transistor, and the input RF signal being provided
`
`to both the first and second gain transistors.
`
`3. (Original) The apparatus of claim 2, the first amplifier stage further comprising a first inductor
`
`coupled to the first gain transistor, and the second amplifier stage further comprising a
`
`second inductor coupled to the second gain transistor.
`
`

`

`4. (Original) The apparatus of claim 2.
`
`the first and second gain transistors having sources
`
`coupled to circuit ground.
`
`Serial No. 13/590,423
`
`5. (Original) The apparatus of claim 2, the first and second amplifier stages providing the first
`
`and second output RF signals in a first mode and providing the first output RF signal but
`
`not the second output RF signal in a second mode, the first and second cascode transistors
`
`being enabled in the first mode, and only one of the first and second cascode transistors
`
`being enabled in the second mode.
`
`6. (Original) The apparatus of claim 5, the first and second gain transistors being applied the
`
`input RF signal in both the first mode and the second mode, and one of the first and
`
`second gain transistors operating in a saturation region and the other one of the first and
`
`second gain transistors operating in a linear region in the second mode.
`
`7. (Original) The apparatus of claim 1. further comprising:
`
`a feedback circuit coupled between an output and an input of at least one of the first and
`
`second amplifier stages.
`
`8. (Original) The apparatus of claim 7, the feedback circuit comprising a resistor, or a capacitor,
`
`or both a resistor and a capacitor.
`
`9. (Original) The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising:
`
`a first attenuation circuit coupled to the first amplifier stage and configured to receive the
`
`input RF signal; and
`
`a second attenuation circuit coupled to the second amplifier stage and configured to
`
`receive the input RF signal.
`
`10. (Original) The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising:
`
`an attenuation circuit coupled to the first and second amplifier stages and configured to
`
`-3-
`
`

`

`receive the input RF signal.
`
`Serial No. 13/590,423
`
`11. (Original) The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising:
`
`an input matching circuit coupled to the first and second amplifier stages and configured
`
`to receive a receiver input signal and provide the input RF signal.
`
`12.
`
`(Original) The apparatus of claim 11,
`
`the input matching circuit being tunable and
`
`comprising at least one adjustable circuit component.
`
`13. (Original) The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising:
`
`a third amplifier stage configured to receive and amplify a second input RF signal and
`
`provide the first output RF signal to the first load circuit when the third amplifier
`
`stage is enabled; and
`
`a fourth amplifier stage configured to receive and amplify the second input RF signal and
`
`provide the second output RF signal to the second load circuit when the fourth
`
`amplifier stage is enabled.
`
`14. (Original) The apparatus of claim 1,
`
`the first amplifier stage configured to receive and amplify the input RF signal or a second
`
`input RF signal and provide the first output RF signal to the first load circuit when
`
`the first amplifier stage is enabled, and
`
`the second amplifier stage configured to receive and amplify the input RF signal or the
`
`second input RF signal and provide the second output RF signal to the second
`
`load circuit when the second amplifier stage is enabled.
`
`15. (Original) The apparatus of claim 2, the first amplifier stage further comprising a third gain
`
`transistor coupled to a third cascode transistor,
`
`the second amplifier stage further
`
`comprising a fourth gain transistor coupled to a fourth cascode transistor, and a second
`
`input RF signal being provided to both the third and fourth gain transistors.
`
`-4-
`
`

`

`Serial No. 13/590,423
`
`16. (Original) The apparatus of claim 14, further comprising:
`
`a third amplifier stage configured to receive and amplify a third input RF signal or a
`
`fourth input RF signal and provide the first output RF signal to the first load
`
`circuit when the third amplifier stage is enabled; and
`
`a fourth amplifier stage configured to receive and amplify the third input RF signal or the
`
`fourth input RF signal and provide the second output RF signal to the second load
`
`circuit when the fourth amplifier stage is enabled.
`
`17. (Previously presented) A method comprising:
`
`amplifying a first input radio frequency (RF) signal with a first amplifier stage to obtain a
`
`first output RF signal when the first amplifier stage is enabled, the first input RF
`
`signal employing carrier aggregation comprising transmissions sent on multiple
`
`carriers at different frequencies to a wireless device, the first output RF signal
`
`including at least a first carrier of the multiple carriers; and
`
`amplifying the first input RF signal or a second input RF signal with a second amplifier
`
`stage to obtain a second output RF signal when the second amplifier stage is
`
`enabled, the second output RF signal including at least a second carrier of the
`
`multiple carriers different than the first carrier.
`
`18. (Original) The method of claim 17, further comprising:
`
`enabling the first and second amplifier stages in a first mode to obtain the first and second
`
`output RF signals; and
`
`enabling the first amplifier stage and disabling the second amplifier stage in a second
`
`mode to obtain the first output RF signal but not the second output RF signal.
`
`

`

`Serial No. 13/590,423
`
`19. (Previously presented) An apparatus comprising:
`
`first means for amplifying configured to amplify a first input radio frequency (RF) signal
`
`and provide a first output RF signal when the first means for amplifying is
`
`enabled,
`
`the first
`
`input RF signal employing carrier aggregation comprising
`
`transmissions sent on multiple carriers at different frequencies to a wireless
`
`device, the second output RF signal including at least a second carrier of the
`
`multiple carriers different than the first carrier; and
`
`second means for amplifying configured to amplify the first input RF signal or a second
`
`input RF signal and provide a second output RF signal when the second means for
`
`amplifying is enabled, the second output RF signal including at least a second
`
`carrier of the multiple carriers different than the first carrier.
`
`20. (Original) The apparatus of claim 19, further comprising:
`
`means for enabling the first and second means for amplifying in a first mode to obtain the
`
`first and second output RF signals; and
`
`means for enabling the first means for amplifying and disabling the second means for
`
`amplifying in a second mode to obtain the first output RF signal but not the
`
`second output RF signal.
`
`

`

`REMARKS
`
`Serial No. 13/590,423
`
`The Office Action mailed August 1, 2014, has been received and reviewed. Claims 1-20
`
`are pending in the application. Claims 1, 11, 12, 14, 17 and 19 stand rejected. Claims 2—10, 13,
`
`15, 16, 18 and 20 are objected to as depending from rejected base claims. Applicant has
`
`amended no claims, submits the following remarks, and respectfully requests reconsideration of
`
`the application. No new matter has been added.
`
`35 U.S.C. § 102 Anticipation Rejections
`
`Anticipation Rejection Based on Kaukovuori
`
`Claims 1, 11, 12, 14 and 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated
`
`by U.S. Patent No. 8,442,473 to Kaukovuori et al. (“Kaukovuori”). Applicant respectfully
`
`traverses this rejection, as hereinafter set forth.
`
`According to MPEP §2131, a claim is anticipated only if each and every element as set
`
`forth in the claim is found, either expressly or inherently described, in a single prior art reference
`
`and the identical invention must be shown in as complete detail as is contained in the claim.
`
`Specifically, “unless a reference discloses within the four corners of the document not only all of
`
`the limitations claimed but also all of the limitations arranged or combined in the same way as
`
`recited in the claim, it cannot be said to prove prior invention of the thing claimed and, thus,
`
`cannot anticipate under 35 U.S.C. § 102.” Net MoneyIN, Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc., 545 F.3d 1359,
`
`1371 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (emphasis added).
`
`Applicant submits that Kaukovuori does not and cannot anticipate under 35 U.S.C. § 102
`
`the presently claimed invention of claims 1, ll, l2, l4 and 17, because Kaukovuori does not
`
`describe, either expressly or inherently, the identical inventions in as complete detail as are
`
`contained in the claims.
`
`Regarding independent claims 1 and 17, Applicant’s independent claims 1 and 17
`
`recite, inter alia, “[a first amplifier stage configured to
`
`amplify/ amplifying
`
`with a first
`
`amplifier stage]
`
`when the irst am li ier sta e is enabled
`
`and [a second amplifier stage
`
`configured to
`
`amplifiv/ amplifying
`
`with a second amplifier stage]
`
`when the second
`
`amglitier stage is enabled,” which is n_ot disclosed in Kaukovuori. Generally, Applicant’s
`
`-7-
`
`

`

`Serial No. 13/590,423
`
`claimed invention recites “amplifying
`
`when the [I amplifier stage is enabled.” In contrast,
`
`Kaukovuon’ appears to disclose nonselective amplifiers that continuously amplify. Furthermore,
`
`any ‘enabling,’ ‘selection’ or ‘reconfiguration,’ as disclosed in Kaukovuori, appears to relate to
`
`modification of filter bandwidths, and not to enabling an amplifier stage. Specifically,
`
`Kaukovuori discloses:
`
`One potential method of receiving non—contiguous carrier aggregation signals is to
`receive separate clusters of component carriers in separate receiver chains, each having a
`LO signal of its own. This is depicted in FIG. 15, where Clusterl and Cluster2 are each
`handled by a separate respective receiver chain, as shown in FIG. 15. (Kaukovuori, col.
`10, lns. 23—28; emphasis added).
`When the clusters have unequal bandwidths, the choice of bandwidth (BW) setups
`for both receiver chains may be performed in order to reconfigure the receiver such that
`receiver performance is optimal. Typically, the first branch may be configured in a first
`mode to have a first bandpass filter bandwidth to give first bandpass filtered inphase and
`quadrature components, and may be configured in a second mode to have a first lowpass
`filter bandwidth to give first lowpass filtered inphase and quadrature components. In the
`first mode, a second branch may be configured, for example as shown in FIG. 24 within
`the dashed lines, and for example as shown in FIG. 10 or FIG. 11, to have a second
`bandpass filter bandwidth, different from the first bandpass filter bandwidth, to give
`second bandpass filtered inphase and quadrature components. In the second mode, the
`first branch may be used as a conventional DCR receiver, for example to receive single
`
`carrier or contiguous ca1rie1 signals, and t—hesecond branch, also referred to as an
`additional branch, may be not used, for example by being disconnected or turned off
`(Kaukovumi, col. 13, lns. 28— 46; emphasis added).
`
`Applicant respectfully notes that Kaukovuori appears to disclose reconfiguring filter
`
`bandwidth, which cannot anticipate Applicant’ 8 claimed invention reciting, inter alia,
`
`“amplifying
`
`when the [] amplifier stage is enabled.” Regarding Kaukovuori disclosing “th_e
`
`second branch, also referred to as an additional branch, may be not used, for example by being
`
`disconnected or tumed off,” Applicant respectfully notes that such a disclosure in Kaukovuori
`
`supports the switch 81 in Figure 24 of Kaukovuori which merely disconnects the already—
`
`amplified output signal from the LNA to the second Direct Conversion Receiver (DCR) (shown
`
`within the dashed lines). Accordingly, such a disclosure of a switch SI after any amplification,
`
`also cannot anticipate Applicant’s claimed invention reciting, inter alia, “amplifying . .. when the
`
`[] amplifier stage is enabled,” as claimed by Applicant in independent claims 1 and 17.
`
`-8-
`
`

`

`Serial No. 13/590,423
`
`Therefore, since Kaukovuon' does not disclose Applicant’s claimed invention in as
`
`complete detail as is contained in the claims as is required for a proper anticipation rejection,
`
`Kaukovuori cannot anticipate, according to 35 U.S.C. §102, Applicant’s invention as presently
`
`claimed. Accordingly, Applicant respectfully requests the rejections of independent claims 1 and
`
`17 be withdrawn.
`
`Regarding dependent claims 11, 12 and 14, dependent claims 11, 12 and 14 are
`
`allowable as depending from now—allowable independent claim 1. Accordingly, Applicant
`
`respectfully requests the rejections of dependent claims 11, 12 and 14 be withdrawn.
`
`35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Obviousness Rejections
`
`NOTE: The rejection of claim 19 in the Office Action appears to contain a typographical
`
`error. Specifically, the Office Action rejected claims 1, ll, 12, 14 and 17 under
`
`35 U.S.C. "102 based on a new] cited reference to Kaukovuori however the
`
`Office Action appears, in error, to continue to recite Hirose, cited in the previous
`
`office action, in rejecting claim 19. Accordingly, Applicant assumes the
`
`Examiner meant to also reject claim 19 based on the newly cited reference to
`
`Kaukovuori.
`
`Obviousness Rejection Based on Kaukovuori
`
`Claim 19 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`Kaukovuori. Applicant respectfully traverses this rejection, as hereinafter set forth.
`
`Applicant respectfully submits that, as stated in the M.P.E.P. at § 2143, “The rationale to
`
`support a conclusion that the claim would have been obvious is that all the claimed elements
`
`were known in the prior art and one skilled in the art could have combined the elements as
`
`claimed by known methods with no change in their respective functions, and the combination
`
`yielded nothing more than predictable results to one of ordinary skill in the art.” KSR Int’l Co. v.
`
`Teleflex, Inca, 550 US. 398 (2007) (emphasis added).
`
`The 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Obviousness rejection of claim 19 is improper because the
`
`elements for a prima facie case of Obviousness are not met. Specifically, the rejection fails to
`
`-9-
`
`

`

`Serial No. 13/590,423
`
`meet the criterion that the prior art reference(s) must teach or suggest a_ll the claims limitations.
`
`Regarding independent claim 19, Applicant’s independent claim 19 includes claim
`
`elements not taught or suggested in the cited reference. Applicant’s independent claim 19
`
`recites, inter alia, “a first means for amplifying configured to amplify
`
`when the
`
`rst means or
`
`am li
`
`in is enabled
`
`and a second means for amplifying configured to amplify . .. when the
`
`second means for amplifying is enabled.” Applicant respectfully asserts that Kaukovuori does
`
`not teach or suggest Applicant’s invention as presently claimed in independent claim 19.
`
`Applicant herein affirms the above-arguments that Kaukovuori appears to teach
`
`reconfiguring filter bandwidth and to further teach a switch S '1 after the amplification. Such
`
`teachings cannot render obvious Applicant’s claimed invention reciting, inter alia, “a first means
`
`for amplifying configured to amplify
`
`when the first means for amplifying is enabled
`
`and a
`
`second means for amplifying configured to amplify
`
`enabled,” as claimed by Applicant in independent claim 1 9.
`
`when the second means 'or am li ’ in
`
`Therefore, since Kaukovuori does not teach “a first means for amplifying configured to
`
`amplify
`
`when the irst means or am li
`
`fin
`
`is enabled
`
`and a second means for amplifying
`
`configured to amplify
`
`when the second means for amplifying is enable ” as claimed by
`
`Applicant, the cited reference cannot render obvious, under 35 U.S.C. §lO3, Applicant’s
`
`invention as presently claimed. Accordingly, Applicant respectfully requests the rejection of
`
`independent claim 19 be withdrawn.
`
`Objections to Claims 2-10, 13-16, 18 and 20/Allowable Subject Matter
`
`Claims 2-10, 13-16, 18 and 20 stand objected to as being dependent upon rejected base
`
`claims, but are indicated to contain allowable subject matter and would be allowable if placed in
`
`appropriate independent form. Applicant acknowledges this indication with appreciation, but
`
`respectfully asserts that the claims in their present form, along with all other claims presently
`
`under consideration, are in condition for allowance.
`
`Finality of Next Office Action Precluded
`
`Applicant has traversed the rejection of claims 1, 11, 12, 14, 17 and 19 by argument and
`
`-10-
`
`

`

`Serial No. 13/590,423
`
`not amendment. Therefore, the finality of the next office action would be improper as Applicant
`
`is entitled to an examination on the merits and to amend as a matter of right. In the present
`
`Office Action, Applicant’s independent claims 1, 17 and 19 were not completely examined as to
`
`a_ll of the elements. Accordingly, Applicant submits that this omission to examine all elements of
`
`Applicant’s claimed invention amounts to a failure to articulate a prima facie case of
`
`unpatentability and the burden to rebut this “rejection” has not yet shifted to the Applicant.
`
`Consequently, a next office action cannot properly be made final since only then would the
`
`Applicant be obligated to rebut the rejection, presuming that such an office action sets forth a
`
`primafacie case. (MPEP § 706.07(a)).
`
`-11-
`
`

`

`Serial No. 13/590,423
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`Claims 1—20 are believed to be in condition for allowance, and an early notice thereof is
`
`respectfully solicited. Should the Examiner determine that additional issues remain which might
`
`be resolved by a telephone conference, the Examiner is respectfully invited to contact
`
`Applicant’s undersigned attorney.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Dated: October28, 2014
`
`By:
`
`/Ramin Mobarhan, Reg? 50,182/
`
`Ramin Mobarhan, Reg. No. 50,182
`(858) 658 2447
`
`QUALCOMM Incmporated
`5775 Morehouse Drive
`
`San Diego, California 92121
`Telephone:
`(858) 658-5787
`Facsimile:
`(858) 658—2502
`
`-12-
`
`