throbber
USOO7463997B2
`
`(12) Unlted States Patent
`(10) Patent No.:
`US 7,463,997 B2
`
`Pasolini et a].
`(45) Date of Patent:
`Dec. 9, 2008
`
`(54) PEDOMETER DEVICE AND STEP
`DETECTION METHOD USING AN
`ALGORITHM FOR SELF-ADAPTIVE
`COMPUTATION OF ACCELERATION
`THRESHOLDS
`
`............... 702/160
`4/2000 Gaudetet al.
`6,052,654 A
`10/2000 Richardson et al.
`......... 600/300
`6,135,951 A
`6,826,477 B2 * 11/2004 Ladetto et al.
`.............. 701/217
`6,898,550 B1
`5/2005 Blackadar etal.
`........... 702/182
`2006/0020177 A1 *
`1/2006 Seo et al.
`.................... 600/300
`
`75
`
`(
`
`)
`
`.
`.
`.
`_
`_
`_
`InVemorSZ Fabl" P359111“: 3- Martmo Slccomano
`(IT), 1"” B1nda,Voghera (IT)
`
`2007/0073514 A1 *
`2007/0143069 A1 *
`2007/0198187 A1 *
`
`........... 702/160
`3/2007 Nogimori et al.
`6/2007 Pasolini et al.
`.............. 702/160
`8/2007 Pasolini et al.
`.............. 701/220
`
`(73) Assignee: STMicroelectronics S.r.l., Agrate
`Brianza (IT)
`
`( * ) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 3 days.
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`GB
`
`2 359 890
`
`9/2001
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 11/537,933
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`(22)
`
`(65)
`
`(30)
`
`Filed:
`
`OCt- 2: 2006
`_
`_
`_
`Prlor Publlcatlon Data
`US 2007/0143068 A1
`Jun. 21, 2007
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`
`(EP)
`
`.................................. 05425683
`
`
`
`Oct. 3, 2005
`n .
`.
`(51)
`I t Cl
`(200601)
`G01C 22/00
`702/160
`"""""""""""
`(52) U..S. Cl' """"
`(58) Fleld of Class1ficatlon Search ................. 702/ 141,
`702/15(L154, 158, 160; 600/595; 73/490:
`.
`.
`73/510
`.
`See appl1cat1on file for complete search hISIOI'Y
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`(56)
`
`Primary ExamineriMichael P Nghiem
`(74) Attorney, Agent, orFirmiLisa K. Jorgenson; Dennis M.
`de Guzman; Seed IP Law Group PLLC
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`In a pedometer device for detecting and counting steps Of a
`.
`.
`.
`.
`user on foot, an accelerometer sensor detects a vertical accel-
`erat1on generated dur1ng the step. A process1ng un1t, con-
`nected to the accelerometer sensor, processes an acceleration
`signal relating to the acceleration in order to detect the occur-
`fence of a step, and in particular compares the acceleration
`signal with a first reference threshold. The processing unit
`automatically adapts the first reference threshold as a func-
`tion of the acceleration signal. In particular, the processing
`unit modifies the first reference threshold as a function of an
`envelope of the amp11tude of the acceleratlon s1gnal.
`
`5,583,776 A
`
`12/1996 Levi et a1.
`
`................... 364/450
`
`30 Claims, 5 Drawing Sheets
`
`/ ’
`
`PROCESSING UNIT
`
`SETTING
`
`AXIS-DETERMINATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FIRST COMPARATOR
`
`DISTANCE-CALCULATION
`
`
`
`THRESHOLD—ADAPTATION SECOND COMPARATOR
`
`ENVELOPE CALCULATION MEAN-VALUE CALCULATION
`
`
`
`|
`
`LENGTH—ESTIMATION
`
`DISPLAY
`
`4
`
`INTERFACE
`
`5
`
`Page 1 of 12
`
`SAMSUNG EXHIBIT 1008
`
`Page 1 of 12
`
`SAMSUNG EXHIBIT 1008
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 9, 2008
`
`Sheet 1 of5
`
`US 7,463,997 B2
`
`/I
`
`PROCESSING UNIT
`
`SETTING
`
`FIRST COMPARATOR
`
`DISTANCE-CALCULATION
`
`THRESHOLD—ADAPTATION
`
`SECOND COMPARATOR
`
`INTERFACE
`
`ENVELOPE CALCULATION
`
`MEAN-VALUE CALCULATION
`
`AXIS-DETERMINATION
`LENGTH-ESTIMATION
`
`
`DISPLAY
`
`FIG. I
`
`Page 2 of 12
`
`Page 2 of 12
`
`

`

`
`
`US. PatentUS. Patent
`
`
`
`Dec. 9, 2008Dec. 9, 2008
`
`
`
`Sheet 2 of5Sheet 2 of5
`
`
`
`US 7,463,997 B2US 7,463,997 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 12Page 3 of 12
`
`Page 3 of 12
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 9, 2008
`
`Sheet 3 of5
`
`US 7,463,997 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DETECWON
`CalAcc > 8*
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STEP
`INCREMENT
`
`STEPLENGTH
`ADAPIABQN
`
`DISTANCE
`INCREMENT
`
`’
`
`°‘ " '
`°‘ °
`CalAcc AND THRESHOLD ADAPTATION
`
`_
`INCREMENTOFCALORIE
`SPEED COMPUTATION
`
`
`
`Fig.3
`
`Page 4 of 12
`
`Page 4 of 12
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 9, 2008
`
`Sheet 4 of5
`
`US 7,463,997 B2
`
`DETERMINATION OF ACCELERATION DATUM
`CalAcc AND THRESHOLD ADAPTATION
`
`
`11 18
`'
`
`ACQUISITION 0F
`ACCELERATION SAMPLE Acc
`
`30
`
`
`ELIMINATION OF D.C. COMPONENT ‘
`34
`AND DETERMINATION OF CalACC
`
`34
`
`32
`
`
`Env+ = 0I1*Env+
`(cc1 < I)
`
`V
`
`_
`
`,
`
`‘
`
`35
`
`NO®YES
`
`-,
`
`EnIr = a2*EnV'
`((12 < 1)
`
`37
`
`3* = [3* Env+
`([3 <1)
`.
`38
`
`
`39
`
`46
`
`NO
`
`YES
`
`- --.
`
`
`S'= B" EnV'
`(B < 1)
`
`No @YES m
`
`43
`
`
`
`- F
`
`ig.4
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 12
`
`Page 5 of 12
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Dec. 9, 2008
`
`Sheet 5 of 5
`
`US 7,463,997 B2
`
`CalAcc
`
`kill.
`
`M
`
`WNAConNN
`
`D
`
`MAmE_”N.wRDEETAE5'.NABNTMTETR0E+7.EPEAAElLDSEDMATTTELDSEEDRUEMCOE>ATRACFPMCHSCHCNOMAUASAMPEWWaT0RMFEHIETIGCNC
`
`IHIDEDPNNTE_.HTEAME1moWmsm.wmm7mmmpmmms.[CSImmP9EdII
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 12
`
`Page 6 of 12
`
`
`

`

`US 7,463,997 B2
`
`1
`PEDOMETER DEVICE AND STEP
`DETECTION METHOD USING AN
`ALGORITHM FOR SELF-ADAPTIVE
`COMPUTATION OF ACCELERATION
`THRESHOLDS
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`1. Field of the Invention
`
`The present invention relates to a pedometer device and to
`a step detection method using an algorithm for self-adaptive
`computation of acceleration thresholds.
`2. Description of the Related Art
`Step-counting devices (referred to in general as pedom-
`eters) are known, which, being carried by a user, enable
`measurement ofthe number of steps made, and calculation of
`the distance traveled, as well as supplying of additional infor-
`mation, such as, for example, the average speed, or the con-
`sumption of calories.
`Pedometers are advantageously used in inertial navigation
`systems (the so-called dead-reckoning systems) applied to
`human beings. Such systems trace the movements of a user,
`by identifying and measuring his/her displacements starting
`from a known starting point, without resorting to the use of a
`Global Positioning System (GPS), or by acting as aid to a
`GPS. In said systems, a compass supplies the information
`linked to the direction of displacement, and the pedometer
`supplies the information linked to the amount of said dis-
`placement. Pedometers are also used in a wide range of appli-
`cations in the clinical sector (for example, in rehabilitation),
`and in general in the field of fitness (for example, as instru-
`ments for monitoring a physical activity).
`In particular, pedometers are known that use integrated
`accelerometers of a MEMS (micro-electromechanical sys-
`tem) type for step detection. In particular, such pedometers
`have particularly compact dimensions, and can be advanta-
`geously integrated within portable devices, such as mobile
`phones, Mp3 readers, camcorders, etc.
`The aforesaid pedometers implement a step detection
`method based upon the analysis of the pattern of a vertical
`acceleration, which is generated during the various phases of
`the step by the contact of the foot to the ground, and which is
`detected by an accelerometer fixed to the body of the user. In
`this connection, it is emphasized that “vertical acceleration”
`means herein an acceleration directed along the vertical ofthe
`user’s body. In particular, the occurrence of a step is deter-
`mined by identifying acceleration peaks that appear in the
`acceleration signal, and said peaks are detected by comparing
`the acceleration signal with a given reference threshold, hav-
`ing a pre-set value.
`However, even though the acceleration signal has a profile
`that is repeatable at each step, its pattern (and, in particular, its
`amplitude and temporal extension) has a wide variability
`according to a number of factors that affect the gait, such as
`the resting surface, the type of shoe worn (rigid sole or flex-
`ible sole, etc.), and the speed of the gait (slow walking, fast
`walking, running, etc.). Furthermore, each individual user has
`given characteristics and peculiarities that affect the gait,
`differentiating it from that of other users.
`It follows that a step detection based upon the comparison
`ofthe value ofthe acceleration signal with a reference thresh-
`old having a pre-set value for the detection of acceleration
`peaks, involves the occurrence of errors that may even be
`considerable in counting ofthe steps, and in the measurement
`of the distance traveled. In particular, if the threshold is too
`low, spurious signals, rebounds, or noise in general, may be
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`
`counted as steps; on the other hand, if the threshold is too
`high, some steps may not be detected.
`
`BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`invention provides a
`One embodiment of the present
`pedometer device and a method for detecting and counting
`steps which will enable the aforesaid disadvantages and prob-
`lems to be overcome.
`
`One embodiment ofthe invention is a pedometer device for
`detecting and counting the steps ofa user. The device includes
`an accelerometer sensor configured to detect an acceleration
`generated during a step; and a processing unit connected to
`the accelerometer sensor, and configured to process an accel-
`eration signal relating to the acceleration to detect the occur-
`rence of a step. The processing unit includes a first compara-
`tor configured to compare the acceleration signal with a first
`reference threshold, and a threshold-adaptation circuit con-
`figured to modify the first reference threshold as a function of
`the acceleration signal.
`One embodiment of the invention is a step detection
`method for detecting steps in the gait of a user. The method
`includes producing an acceleration signal relating to an accel-
`eration generated during a step; and processing the accelera-
`tion signal to detect the occurrence ofthe step. The processing
`step includes comparing the acceleration signal with a first
`reference threshold, and modifying the first reference thresh-
`old as a function of the acceleration signal.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL
`VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`For a better understanding of the present invention, pre-
`ferred embodiments thereof are now described, purely by
`way of non-limiting example and with reference to the
`attached drawings, wherein:
`FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a pedometer device;
`FIG. 2 shows a graph corresponding to the pattern of an
`acceleration signal during a step;
`FIG. 3 shows a flowchart corresponding to operations of
`detection and counting of steps, executed by a processing unit
`of the pedometer device of FIG. 1;
`FIG. 4 shows a flowchart corresponding to operations of
`self-adaptive modification of acceleration thresholds,
`executed by the processing unit of the pedometer device of
`FIG. 1;
`FIGS. 5-6 are graphs corresponding to the pattern of an
`acceleration signal during a step and of reference thresholds
`associated to the algorithm of FIG. 3;
`FIG. 7 shows a possible variant of the flowchart of FIG. 3;
`and
`
`FIG. 8 is a partially exploded schematic view of a portable
`device,
`in particular a mobile phone,
`incorporating the
`pedometer device of FIG. 1.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
`
`FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a pedometer device 1,
`comprising an accelerometer 2, of a linear type and having a
`vertical detection axis z, and a processing unit 3, connected to
`the accelerometer 2. Advantageously, the accelerometer 2
`and the processing unit 3 are mounted on the same printed
`circuit, housed inside a casing of the pedometer device 1 (not
`illustrated). The pedometer device 1 is carried by a user, for
`example on his belt or on his shoulder, so as to be fixed to the
`
`Page 7 of 12
`
`Page 7 of 12
`
`

`

`US 7,463,997 B2
`
`3
`body of the user and be able to sense vertical accelerations
`that occur during the step, caused by the impact of the feet on
`the ground.
`The pedometer device 1 further comprises a display screen
`4, connected at an output of the processing unit 3, and an
`interface 5, connected at an input ofthe processing unit 3. The
`display screen 4 displays information at output from the
`pedometer device 1, such as the number of steps, the distance
`traveled, etc. The interface 5, for example, including push-
`buttons, an alphanumeric keypad, communication ports, etc.,
`allows the user to communicate with the processing unit 3 (for
`example, by entering data).
`The accelerometer 2 is advantageously an integrated sen-
`sor of semiconductor material, made using the MEMS tech-
`nology, of a known type and thus not described in detail
`herein. In use, the accelerometer 2 detects the component
`along the detection axis Z of the vertical acceleration gener-
`ated during the step, and produces a corresponding accelera-
`tion signal A.
`As shown in FIG. 2, the pattern ofthe acceleration signal A
`(with the dc. component filtered out) in time t has a given
`acceleration profile which repeats at each step (indicated by
`the dashed rectangle). In detail, the acceleration profile com-
`prises in succession: a positive phase, in which a positive-
`acceleration peak occurs (i.e., directed upwards), due to con-
`tact and consequent impact of the foot with the ground; and a
`negative phase in which a negative-acceleration peak occurs
`(i.e., directed downwards) due to rebound, having an absolute
`value smaller than that of the positive-acceleration peak.
`The processing unit 3, comprising a microprocessor circuit
`(for example, a microcontroller or DSP), acquires at pre-set
`intervals samples of the acceleration signal A generated by
`the accelerometer 2, and executes appropriate processing
`operations for counting the number of steps and measuring
`the distance traveled. As will be described in detail hereinaf-
`
`ter, the processing unit 3 compares the value of the accelera-
`tion signal A (with the dc. component filtered out) with a
`positive reference threshold S+ and with a negative reference
`threshold S", for identifying, respectively, the positive phase
`(positive acceleration peak) and the negative phase (negative
`acceleration peak) of the step.
`According to one embodiment ofthe present invention, the
`values ofthe positive and negative reference thresholds S“, S"
`are not fixed and equal to a given pre-set value, but are
`calculated in a self-adaptive way (i.e., in a way that adapts
`without any external intervention from a user) by the process-
`ing unit 3, based on the values assumed by the detected
`acceleration. In particular, as will be clarified hereinafter, the
`values ofthe positive and negative reference thresholds 8", S—
`are modified at each acquisition of a new sample of the
`acceleration signal A, as a function of the value of a positive
`and negative amplitude envelope ofthe acceleration signal, in
`such a manner that the reference thresholds vary with time
`approximately following said envelopes. The pedometer
`device 1 thus adapts to variations in the detection conditions
`(and, in particular, to different profiles of the acceleration
`signal, in terms of amplitude and duration), due, for example,
`to a different type of terrain, or to an increase in the speed of
`the gait.
`The algorithm implemented by the processing unit 3 for
`performing, among other things, the operations of step count-
`ing and of traveled distance measurement is now described,
`with reference to FIG. 3. Said algorithm envisages the analy-
`sis of the acceleration signal A in order to look for a positive
`phase ofthe step followed by a negative phase within a pre- set
`time interval from the occurrence of the positive phase. In the
`case where said sequence occurs (which indicates the occur-
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`
`rence of a step), counting ofthe steps and measurement ofthe
`total distance traveled are updated; otherwise, the algorithm
`returns to the initial condition of looking for a new positive
`phase ofthe step. In particular, the positive acceleration peaks
`that occur within the pre-set time interval are ignored by the
`algorithm (in so far as they can be ascribed to phenomena of
`noise, such as impact, anomalous rebounds, etc.).
`In detail, the algorithm starts with initialization, block 10,
`ofthe values ofthe positive and negative reference thresholds
`S+ and S", respectively, at a positive minimum value S1 and at
`a negative minimum value 82, the latter being smaller, in
`absolute value, than the positive minimum value 81. As will
`be clarified, said minimum values represent limit values
`below which the reference thresholds are not allowed to drop.
`In addition, the values of a positive envelope Env+ and of a
`negative envelope Env' of the acceleration signal A (which
`will subsequently be used for modification of the reference
`thresholds) are initialized, respectively, at the positive mini-
`mum value S1 and at the negative minimum value 82.
`Next, block 11, the processing unit 3 determines a first
`acceleration datum CalAcc, and consequently modifies the
`values of the reference thresholds (as will be described in
`detail hereinafter with reference to FIGS. 4 and 5).
`The algorithm then proceeds, block 12, with the search for
`the positive phase of the step, by comparing the value of the
`acceleration datum CalAcc with the positive reference thresh-
`old S+, to detect a positive acceleration peak of the accelera-
`tion signal A.
`Until a positive phase of the step is found, block 13, the
`algorithm proceeds with acquisition of a new acceleration
`datum CalAcc in block 11 (and corresponding modification
`of the reference thresholds), and with the comparison of said
`new acceleration datum with the positive reference threshold
`8*.
`The positive phase is detected when the acceleration datum
`exceeds the positive reference threshold S+ and then drops
`below the positive reference threshold, the instant of detec-
`tion of the positive phase corresponding to the instant in
`which the acceleration datum drops again below the positive
`reference threshold 8". At this instant, the processing unit 3
`stores the value assumed by the positive reference threshold
`8", which is a maximum value Strum.
`After the positive phase detection, the algorithm proceeds
`with the search for the negative phase of the step, block 14,
`i.e., of a negative acceleration peak, by comparing the value
`ofthe acceleration datum CalAcc with the negative reference
`threshold 8'. Inparticular, the search for the negative phase of
`the step is executed within a certain time interval Mask, the
`value of which must be lower than a maximum interval Max-
`
`_Mask from detection ofthe positive phase (corresponding to
`a certain number of samples, the value ofwhich is determined
`also as a function of the sampling rate of the acceleration
`data).
`Until a negative acceleration peak is detected, block 15,
`and as long as the time interval Mask is shorter than the
`maximum interval Max_Mask, block 16, the algorithm pro-
`ceeds with the search for the negative phase of the step. In
`detail, the time interval Mask is incremented, block 17, a new
`acceleration datum CalAcc is acquired (and the values of the
`reference thresholds are modified accordingly), block 18
`(which is equivalent to block 11), and the algorithm returns to
`block 14. If no negative phase of the step has been identified
`after expiry of the maximum interval Max_Mask, block 16,
`the algorithm returns to block 11 in order to look for a new
`potential positive phase of the step.
`On the contrary, if the negative phase is identified within
`the maximum interval Max_Mask (i.e.,
`the acceleration
`
`Page 8 of 12
`
`Page 8 of 12
`
`

`

`US 7,463,997 B2
`
`5
`datum drops below the negative reference threshold S"), the
`processing unit 3 determines the occurrence of a step, and,
`block 20, increments the count of the detected steps. Further-
`more, the estimate of the distance traveled is updated by
`adding to the previous value an estimate of the length of the
`current step LPS.
`In detail, according to one embodiment of the present
`invention, block 21, the processing unit 3 calculates the esti-
`mate of the length of the current step LPS as a function of the
`maximum value S+max reached by the positive reference
`threshold S+ during the positive phase of the step, which is
`indicatory of the value of the positive acceleration peak. The
`actual length ofthe step varies with respect to a standard value
`determined on the basis of the physical characteristics of the
`user, according to the speed ofthe step, or, equivalently, to the
`amplitude of the generated acceleration. Consequently, the
`estimate ofthe length ofthe current step LPS is calculated via
`the formula:
`
`LPS:LP1(S*W)
`
`where LP is a standard length ofthe step, corresponding to 0.4
`to 0.5 times the height of the user, and f(S+max) is a corrective
`function, for example a linear one, based upon the maximum
`value SUM. The corrective function f(S+maX) canbe tabulated
`on the basis ofexperimental tests, which enable association to
`a given maximum value S+max of an appropriate correction to
`be made to the standard length ofthe step LP. Inparticular, the
`function f(S+max) is conveniently stored in the processing unit
`3.
`
`The algorithm then proceeds, block 22, by increasing the
`distance traveled on the basis of the estimate of the length of
`the current step LPS, previously calculated. Furthermore,
`block 23, further variables supplied at output from the
`pedometer device 1 can be updated, such as the number of
`calories (also in this case, the previous count is updated by
`adding an average consumption of calories per step), and the
`average and instantaneous speed of travel, which are calcu-
`lated in a known way not described in detail herein.
`Next, the algorithm returns to block 11 in order to detect a
`new acceleration profile indicating occurrence of a step.
`There will now be described in detail, with reference to
`FIG. 4, the algorithm implemented by the processing unit 3
`for determination of a new acceleration datum CalAcc and
`
`consequent updating ofthe values ofthe positive and negative
`reference thresholds S+ and S", in such a manner that the
`aforesaid values will follow approximately the positive and
`negative envelope of the acceleration signal.
`In brief, said algorithm envisages calculation, for each new
`acceleration datum CalAcc, ofthe values ofthe positive enve-
`lope Env+ and negative envelope Env', and modification of
`the value of the positive and negative reference thresholds S+
`and S" as a function of the positive envelope Env+ and nega-
`tive envelope Env', respectively.
`In detail,
`in an initial block 30, the processing unit 3
`acquires from the accelerometer 2 a new acceleration sample
`Acc ofthe accelerationA. Then, block 31, the dc. component
`of said acceleration value (due substantially to the accelera-
`tion of gravity) is eliminated so as to determine the accelera-
`tion datum CalAcc, with zero mean value, which will be used
`subsequently in the algorithm. In detail, the mean value Accm
`of the acceleration sample Acc is calculated with the expres-
`s10n:
`
`Accm :y-Accm+(l —y)- CalAcc
`
`where y is a constant between 0 and l, for example equal to
`0.95, andAccm and CalAcc are the values, respectively, ofthe
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6
`mean value and of the acceleration datum, which were cal-
`culated at the previous acquisition. The new acceleration
`datum CalAcc is calculated by applying the relation:
`CaZACC:ACC—Accm
`
`Then, the algorithm proceeds with the determination ofthe
`new values ofthe positive and negative envelopes Env+, Env'.
`In detail, block 32, if the value of the acceleration datum
`CalAcc is higher than the value of the positive envelope Env+
`(as calculated at the previous acquisition), the new value of
`the positive envelope Env+ is set equal to the value of the
`acceleration datum CalAcc, block 33. Otherwise, block 34,
`the value ofthe positive envelope Env+ is set equal to a proper
`fraction of the previous value; i.e., the previous value is mul-
`tiplied by a first constant a1<l, for example, (x1:0.9458. In
`this way, the value of the envelope coincides substantially
`with the value of the acceleration datum, if the acceleration
`datum is greater than the previous value of the envelope, and
`otherwise decreases (in particular, almost exponentially) with
`respect to the previous value.
`Likewise, block 35, if the value of the acceleration datum
`CalAcc is smaller than the negative envelope Env' (as calcu-
`lated at the previous acquisition), the new value of the nega-
`tive envelope Env' is set equal to the value of the acceleration
`datum CalAcc, block 36. Otherwise, block 37, the value ofthe
`negative envelope Env' is set equal to a proper fraction ofthe
`previous value of the envelope; i.e., it is multiplied by a
`second constant a2<l, for example, (x2:0.9438. Note, in par-
`ticular, that the different value of the first and second con-
`stants (x1, azis due to the different value of the positive and
`negative accelerations, said negative accelerations being of
`smaller intensity, since the negative phase of the step is a
`rebound of the positive phase.
`The algorithm then proceeds with updating ofthe values of
`the reference thresholds as a function of the envelope values
`previously calculated. In detail, block 38, the value of the
`positive reference threshold S+ is set equal to a certain proper
`fraction of the positive envelope Env+; in particular, it is set
`equal to the value of the positive envelope Env+ multiplied by
`a third constant [3<l, for example, [3:065 However, if the
`value thus calculated is less than the positive minimum value
`81, block 39, the value of the positive reference threshold S+
`is set at said positive minimum value 81, block 40.
`Likewise, block 41, the value of the negative reference
`threshold S" is set equal to a certain proper fraction of the
`negative envelope; in particular, also this value is multiplied
`by the third constant [3. However, once again, ifthe value thus
`calculated is less than the negative minimum value 82, block
`42, the value ofthe negative reference threshold 8' is set at the
`negative minimum value 82, block 43.
`The values of the new reference thresholds thus calculated
`
`are then used for detection of the positive and negative phases
`of the step, as described previously.
`FIGS. 5 and 6 show the curves of the positive and negative
`reference thresholds S“, S", and of the positive and negative
`envelopes Env”, Env', calculated using the algorithm
`described previously, and the pattern of the acceleration sig-
`nal CalAcc (constituted by the sequence of the acceleration
`data CalAcc). It is evident that the reference thresholds sub-
`stantially follow the envelopes of the acceleration signal
`(which, in turn, follow the peaks of the acceleration signal).
`In detail, the value ofthe positive acceleration threshold S+
`is initially equal to the positive minimum value S 1 (see, in
`particular, FIG. 6), and remains constant as long as the accel-
`eration datum CalAcc remains less than the positive accel-
`eration threshold 8". Starting from the instant at which the
`acceleration datum CalAcc exceeds the positive acceleration
`
`Page 9 of 12
`
`Page 9 of 12
`
`

`

`US 7,463,997 B2
`
`7
`threshold 8+, and as long as the acceleration datum CalAcc
`increases, the positive acceleration threshold S+ follows, in a
`“damped” way, the increase ofthe acceleration datum CalAcc
`(see,
`in particular, FIG. 5). Next, the acceleration datum
`CalAcc starts to decrease, and, along with it, the positive
`acceleration threshold S“, which, as long as the acceleration
`datum CalAcc decreases, assumes a decreasing pattern (with-
`out, however, dropping below the positive minimum value
`Sl). In particular, at the end of the positive phase of the step,
`the maximum value S+max is stored. The positive reference
`threshold S+ returns to the positive minimum value Sl when
`the user comes to a halt. A similar pattern (in absolute value)
`is showed by the negative acceleration threshold S", with the
`difference that the decrease (in ab solute value) ofthe negative
`acceleration threshold S" is different, in particular faster. Said
`difference is due to the different conformation ofthe negative
`acceleration peak, which has a smaller amplitude and a longer
`duration as compared to the positive accelerationpeak, so that
`an excessively long decrease time could lead to the peak not
`being detected. The difference, in absolute value, of the posi-
`tive minimum value S 1 and ofthe negative minimum value S2
`is due to the same reason.
`
`According to one embodiment ofthe present invention, the
`positive minimum value S1 and the negative minimum value
`S2 can be modified from outside, for example through the
`interface 5 in order to modify the sensitivity of the pedometer
`device 1. In particular, if said minimum values are decreased,
`the sensitivity ofthe device increases, in so far as acceleration
`peaks of smaller amplitude (for example, due to a particularly
`slow gait or to a surface that is not very rigid) can be detected.
`At the same time, however, the number of false positives
`detected increases, in so far as noise (external vibrations,
`bumps, fast movements made by the user) is more likely to
`cause erroneous detections assimilated to the phases of the
`step.
`The advantages of the pedometer device and of the corre-
`sponding step detection method are clear from the foregoing
`description.
`In any case, it is emphasized that the pedometer device 1 is
`able to adapt to changes in the acceleration profile, for
`example due to an increase in the walking speed, and so
`external interventions for resetting the acceleration thresh-
`olds necessary for step detection are not needed.
`The fact that the acceleration thresholds follow the enve-
`
`lopes of the acceleration signal (analogously to an electronic
`peak detector) enables said changes to be followed rapidly,
`without any risk for any loss of steps and counting errors
`occurring, and at the same time enables a good insensitivity to
`noise to be achieved. In particular, when the accelerations
`increase (in absolute value), for example because the walking
`speed has increased, the reference thresholds increase rap-
`idly, so as to adapt rapidly to the new conditions. When,
`instead, the accelerations decrease, for example because the
`user is slowing down, the reference thresholds also decrease,
`but slowly, and always remaining above a minimum value. In
`this way, the device is able to follow closely a new increase in
`the acceleration values.
`
`Finally, it is clear that modifications and variations can be
`made to what is described and illustrated herein without
`
`thereby departing from the scope of the present invention, as
`defined in the appended claims.
`In particular, as shown in FIG. 7, in which the same refer-
`ence numbers are used for designating blocks similar to the
`ones previously described, according to an alternative
`embodiment of the present invention, the step detection algo-
`rithm can be simplified, and can be based exclusively upon
`the identification of the positive phase of the step (i.e., of the
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`8
`positive acceleration peak). In this case, the algorithm uses a
`single reference threshold, in particular the positive reference
`threshold S“, which is modified as a function of the value of
`the positive envelope Env+, in a way altogether similar to
`what has been described previously. Said simplified algo-
`rithm, although computationally less burdensome for the pro-
`cessing unit 3, has, however, the disadvantage of being more
`sensitive to noise. In fact, the lack of check on the presence of
`the negative phase, after the positive phase, renders false
`detection and counting errors more likely.
`The accelerometer 2 could be equipped with a number of
`axes of measurement, for example three mutually orthogonal
`axes of measurement, and be built, for example, as described
`in “3 -axis Digital Output Accelerometer For Future Automo-
`tive Applications”, B. Vigna et al., AMAA 2004. In this case,
`according to one embodiment of the present invention, the
`algorithm implemented by the processing unit 3 envisages
`identifying the main vertical axis to be used for step detection
`as the axis of detection that has the highest mean acceleration
`value Accm (on account of gravity). For example, the main
`vertical axis can be identified at each acquisition of a new
`acceleration sample, block 30 of FIG. 4, so as to take into
`account variations in the orientation of the pedometer device
`1, and consequently of the accelerometer 2 arranged inside it.
`Instead of being integrated in the pedometer device 1, the
`accelerometer 2 could be arranged outside the casing thereof,
`and connected, in a wired or wireless way, to the detection
`unit 3. In this case, the accelerometer 2 could advantageously
`be housed in a garment or accessory worn by the user, for
`example a shoe, a belt, a watch, etc.
`As shown in FIG. 8, the pedometer device 1, due to its
`reduced dimensions, may advantageously be housed inside a
`portable device, in particular a mobile phone 50 (or else an
`Mp3 reader, a camera, a PDA, a game console, etc.). In this
`case, the accelerometer 2, and the processing unit 3 are
`mounted on a printed circuit board 52 fixed within a casing 53
`ofthe mobile phone 50. Advantageously, in this embodiment,
`the processing unit 3, in addition to implementing the algo-
`rithms previously described, controls the operation of the
`mobile phone 50. Likewise,

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket