throbber
RIMFROST AS VS.
`AKER BIOMARINE ANTARCTIC AS
`
`DR. STEPHEN J. TALLON
`October 7, 2019
`
`Original File 285817.txt
`Min-U-Script® with Word Index
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0000
`
`

`

`1
`
`
`
` 1 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
` 2 BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` ------------------------------------------------x
` 3 RIMFROST AS,
`
` 4 Petitioner,
`
` 5 vs.
`
` 6 AKER BIOMARINE ANTARCTIC AS,
`
` 7 Patent Owner.
`
` 8 CASE NUMBER: IPR 2018-01730
`
` 9 U.S. Patent No. 9,072,752
` ------------------------------------------------x
`10
`
`11 4 Century Drive
` Parsippany, New Jersey
`12
` October 7, 2019
`13 8:55 a.m.
`
`14
`
`15 Title: BIOEFFECTIVE KRILL OIL COMPOSITIONS
`
`16 TRANSCRIPT OF DEPOSITION OF
`
`17 DR. STEPHEN J. TALLON
`
`18 TRANSCRIPT of the stenographic notes of
` the proceedings in the above-entitled matter, as
`19 taken by and before TAB PREWETT, a Registered
` Professional Reporter, a Certified LiveNote
`20 Reporter, Certified Shorthand Reporter and Notary
` Public.
`21
`
`22
`
`23 ELLEN GRAUER COURT REPORTING CO. LLC
` 126 East 56th Street, Fifth Floor
`24 New York, New York 10022
` 212-750-6434
`25 REF: 285817
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0001
`
`

`

`2
`
`
`
` 1 A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
` 2
`
` 3 HOFFMAN & BARON LLP
`
` 4 Attorneys for Aker Biomarine Antarctic
`
` 5 4 Century Drive, Suite 300
`
` 6 Parsippany, New Jersey 07054-4606
`
` 7 BY: MICHAEL I. CHAKANSKY, ESQ.
`
` 8 Phone No. 1 973-331-1700
`
` 9 mchakansky@hbiplaw.com
`
`10
`
`11 CASIMIR JONES S.C.
`
`12 Attorneys for Rimfrost
`
`13 2275 Deming Way, Suite 310
`
`14 Middleton, Wisconsin 53562
`
`15 BY: J. MITCHELL JONES, ESQ.
`
`16 Phone No. 1 606-662-1277
`
`17 jmjones@casimirjones.com
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0002
`
`

`

`3
`
`
`
` 1 ------------------- I N D E X -------------------
`
` 2 WITNESS EXAMINATION BY PAGE
`
` 3 DR. STEPHEN J. TALLON MR. JONES 4
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6 ---------------- E X H I B I T S ----------------
`
` 7 RIMFROST DESCRIPTION FOR I.D.
`
` 8 PREVIOUSLY MARKED
`
` 9 Exhibit 1009 PCT Publication W 5
`
`10 02007123424, Catchpole
`
`11 Patent, Document
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14 (EXHIBIT RETAINED BY ATTORNEY)
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0003
`
`

`

`4
`
`
` 1 D R. S T E P H E N J. T A L L O N,
`
` 2 G9 Gracefield Road,
`
` 3 Lower Hutt, New Zealand,
`
` 4 having been duly sworn by the notary public to
`
` 5 testify to the truth, testified as follows:
`
` 6
`
` 7 DIRECT EXAMINATION
`
` 8 BY MR. JONES:
`
` 9 Q Good morning, Dr. Tallon. So as
`
`10 part of the procedure -- we have been through a
`
`11 number of these -- do you have any questions
`
`12 about the conduct of deposition proceedings?
`
`13 A No, I think I am ready to go.
`
`14 Q Okay. Good.
`
`15 So I will provide you with a copy
`
`16 of Exhibit 1086, which is entitled:
`
`17 "Reply and Opposition Declaration
`
`18 of Dr. Stephen Tallon for IPR 201801730 for US
`
`19 patent number 9,072,752."
`
`20 And if you will turn to the page,
`
`21 the last page, which is page 0159.
`
`22 A Okay.
`
`23 Q And that's your signature?
`
`24 A That's correct.
`
`25 Q Okay. Okay. So I'm also going to
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0004
`
`

`

`5
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 provide you with a copy of Rimfrost Exhibit 1009,
`
` 3 which is PCT publication W 02007123424, which I
`
` 4 think generally has been referred to as
`
` 5 Catchpole. Okay so I would like you refer you to
`
` 6 paragraph 12 of your declaration.
`
` 7 (Previously Marked Exhibit Rimfrost
`
` 8 No. 1009, Publication W 02007123424,
`
` 9 Catchpole Patent, Document is introduced
`
`10 into the proceedings.)
`
`11 A Okay.
`
`12 Q And there you say the statement
`
`13 that:
`
`14 "Catchpole by itself in a single
`
`15 reference discloses to a POSITA greater than
`
`16 5 percent, 6 percent, and 7 percent, and from
`
`17 6 percent to 10 percent (in the amended claims)
`
`18 ether phospholipids by weight in krill oil."
`
`19 So the question I have relates to
`
`20 the 6 and 7 percent ether phospholipid limitation
`
`21 and the 6 to 10 percent ether phospholipid
`
`22 limitation.
`
`23 Where does Catchpole specifically
`
`24 disclose a krill oil containing either 6 percent
`
`25 or 7 percent ether phospholipids or from
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0005
`
`

`

`6
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 6 percent to 10 percent ether phospholipids?
`
` 3 MR. CHAKANSKY: Objection. Lack of
`
` 4 foundation.
`
` 5 A That is the focus of a reasonably
`
` 6 substantial section of my declaration. So if you
`
` 7 read on, it explains what I mean by this.
`
` 8 But to give you a very quick
`
` 9 summary, the Catchpole -- specific here to
`
`10 concentration of ether phospholipids -- keeping
`
`11 in mind that Catchpole has got broader aims than
`
`12 that -- but a very brief summary related to ether
`
`13 phospholipids, Catchpole describe the types of
`
`14 materials that you should use for making an ether
`
`15 lipid concentrate.
`
`16 It gives a specific example of
`
`17 doing an extraction from the krill meal. It
`
`18 talks about the different methods that you should
`
`19 apply to get to high levels of ether lipids,
`
`20 describes desirable targets for ether lipids.
`
`21 He talked about the 6 and
`
`22 7 percent. Catchpole talks about, you know,
`
`23 concentrations, for example, up to 10 percent
`
`24 ether lipids as a desirable target, and, you
`
`25 know, as I talk about in my declaration,
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0006
`
`

`

`7
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 describes the methods to make those.
`
` 3 So to my mind that's a disclosure
`
` 4 of ether phospholipid content certainly in the
`
` 5 ranges described here.
`
` 6 Q That's -- that's not the question I
`
` 7 asked you.
`
` 8 Where does Catchpole disclose a
`
` 9 krill oil with 6 percent ether phospholipids?
`
`10 MR. CHAKANSKY: Objection. Lack of
`
`11 foundation. You can answer.
`
`12 A Well, that was kind of exactly what
`
`13 I just answered. You look at the patent as a
`
`14 whole, and that's what it describes.
`
`15 Q Okay. So I would like to direct
`
`16 your attention to page 0024 of Exhibit 1009, and
`
`17 example 18, "Fractionation of krill lipids."
`
`18 A Yep.
`
`19 Q And you see in table 16 that that
`
`20 discloses that extract two has 4.8 percent AAPC
`
`21 and AAPE?
`
`22 MR. CHAKANSKY: You mean the sum of
`
`23 them, right?
`
`24 MR. JONES: The sum, yeah.
`
`25 MR. CHAKANSKY: Okay.
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0007
`
`

`

`8
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 A Yes, that's --
`
` 3 Q And AAPC and AAPE are ether
`
` 4 phospholipids, correct?
`
` 5 A That's correct.
`
` 6 Q Is there another example of an
`
` 7 extract -- let's see -- strike that.
`
` 8 Is there another example of a krill
`
` 9 oil or extract in Catchpole that contains greater
`
`10 than 4.8 percent ether phospholipids?
`
`11 A Example 18 is the only specific one
`
`12 that gives the results for a krill oil extract.
`
`13 Q So there is no other example in
`
`14 Catchpole disclosing a krill oil extract with
`
`15 greater than 4.8 percent ether phospholipids; is
`
`16 that correct?
`
`17 A Not examples. But there's a lot of
`
`18 other content in the patent that refers to krill
`
`19 oil and to concentration of ether phospholipids.
`
`20 Q Okay. Staying on example 18 in
`
`21 Exhibit 1009, the first three lines, it indicates
`
`22 that the feed material is freeze dried krill
`
`23 powder; is that correct?
`
`24 A That's correct.
`
`25 Q And I would like to direct your
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0008
`
`

`

`9
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 attention to the page 0060 of your declaration on
`
` 3 paragraph 82.
`
` 4 A Okay.
`
` 5 Q And there you refer to the feed
`
` 6 material as freeze dried krill powder, correct?
`
` 7 A That's correct.
`
` 8 Q Okay. Okay. So then staying on
`
` 9 your declaration, Exhibit 1086, I would like to
`
`10 direct your attention to paragraph 16.
`
`11 MR. CHAKANSKY: What page is that?
`
`12 MR. JONES: Page 0015.
`
`13 MR. CHAKANSKY: Thank you.
`
`14 Q And it's a bit out of register
`
`15 because the exhibit page is 0015 and the actual
`
`16 declaration page is 11.
`
`17 MR. CHAKANSKY: Yeah.
`
`18 MR. JONES: But so we will refer to
`
`19 the page numbers following the exhibit.
`
`20 MR. CHAKANSKY: The one that starts
`
`21 with "Rimfrost."
`
`22 MR. JONES: Yes.
`
`23 MR. CHAKANSKY: Off the record.
`
`24 (There was a discussion off the
`
`25 record.)
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0009
`
`

`

`10
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 MR. CHAKANSKY: We are back on.
`
` 3 Q So I am going to ask a couple of
`
` 4 questions about paragraph 16.
`
` 5 MR. CHAKANSKY: Do you want to read
`
` 6 the whole paragraph?
`
` 7 Q Take your time to review it.
`
` 8 A Okay.
`
` 9 Q Okay. So on paragraph 16, you are
`
`10 talking about example 18, "Fractionation of krill
`
`11 lipids" in Exhibit 1009; is that correct?
`
`12 A That's correct.
`
`13 Q And there in the second line or in
`
`14 the first and second lines you refer to krill oil
`
`15 extracted from the feed material, correct?
`
`16 A That's correct.
`
`17 Q And that feed material is the
`
`18 freeze dried krill powder, correct?
`
`19 A Yeah, indirectly. There is a -- as
`
`20 it goes on to say, there were two stages in the
`
`21 extraction. But the original feed material is
`
`22 the freeze dried krill powder referred to in the
`
`23 example.
`
`24 Q Okay. And then if you go to the
`
`25 top of page 0016, in the first three sentences,
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0010
`
`

`

`11
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 you refer to a freeze dried krill meal, and then
`
` 3 followed -- and then followed by extraction of
`
` 4 the remaining krill meal using CO2 in 11 percent
`
` 5 ethanol co-solvent.
`
` 6 Do you see that?
`
` 7 A I see that.
`
` 8 Q So -- and then are you using the
`
` 9 term "freeze dried krill powder" interchangeably
`
`10 with "freeze dried krill meal" and "krill meal"?
`
`11 A Well, let me -- well, tell me which
`
`12 ones you want me to explain.
`
`13 But, for example, in the second
`
`14 line of page 0016, where it says "freeze dried
`
`15 krill meal," in the terminology used in the
`
`16 actual Catchpole patent example, it is the --
`
`17 it's referring to the same thing as what's
`
`18 described by Catchpole as the "freeze dried krill
`
`19 powder."
`
`20 Q Okay.
`
`21 A If that clarifies the point for
`
`22 you.
`
`23 Q I would like to refer you to
`
`24 paragraphs 29 and 30 of Exhibit 1086, page 0021.
`
`25 MR. CHAKANSKY: And, again, I
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0011
`
`

`

`12
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 suggest you read it.
`
` 3 A Okay.
`
` 4 Q And do you see in paragraph 29 it
`
` 5 says:
`
` 6 "Further supporting the disclosure
`
` 7 of krill meal as a suitable feed source"?
`
` 8 A Yep.
`
` 9 Q And when you refer to "krill meal,"
`
`10 the disclosure of "krill meal as a suitable feed
`
`11 source," are you referring to the "freeze dried
`
`12 krill powder" disclosed in example 18 of
`
`13 Exhibit 1009?
`
`14 A No, the paragraph in 29 is a bit
`
`15 more general than the specific example.
`
`16 Q Okay. Looking at paragraph 30 of
`
`17 Exhibit 1086, you see the statement that:
`
`18 "Of the feed materials and specific
`
`19 examples disclosed by Catchpole, the extract,
`
`20 extract two, of the krill meal of example 18
`
`21 contains the highest level of ether
`
`22 phospholipids."
`
`23 Do you see that?
`
`24 A Yep.
`
`25 Q And does the "krill meal" referred
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0012
`
`

`

`13
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 to in paragraph 30 refer to the "freeze dried
`
` 3 krill powder" of example 18 of Exhibit 1009?
`
` 4 A That was the original material that
`
` 5 the -- that the extract -- the original material
`
` 6 that exact two came from.
`
` 7 Q And that original material is
`
` 8 freeze dried krill powder, correct?
`
` 9 A In example 18 of Catchpole, that's
`
`10 correct.
`
`11 Q And then paragraph 30 goes on to
`
`12 state that:
`
`13 "Further supporting the disclosure
`
`14 of krill meal as a preferred source for achieving
`
`15 greater than 5 percent, greater than 10 percent,
`
`16 and higher levels of ether phospholipids are
`
`17 claimed in the invention."
`
`18 And is the "krill meal" referred to
`
`19 there the "freeze dried krill powder" of example
`
`20 18?
`
`21 A No, in that case, it's a slightly
`
`22 more general use of the term "krill meal."
`
`23 Q Does Exhibit 1009 contain a
`
`24 declaration of any other krill feed material
`
`25 other than freeze dried krill powder?
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0013
`
`

`

`14
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 A Well, I need to read back through
`
` 3 to say that for certain.
`
` 4 But the patent does refer in
`
` 5 places, in general, to "krill meal" -- well, to
`
` 6 krill as a -- as a source. And, you know,
`
` 7 turning krill into a meal was a reasonably
`
` 8 well-established sort of process. And I mean
`
` 9 "krill meal" itself is a reasonably broad term as
`
`10 well.
`
`11 But there are -- yeah, there are
`
`12 places in the patent that refer to -- otherwise
`
`13 to krill in general. And for that matter, the --
`
`14 I mean, the krill feed material, as far as the --
`
`15 the Catchpole patent is concerned, I mean, it
`
`16 doesn't have to be just the krill meal. It could
`
`17 even be an extract from krill that fits the kind
`
`18 of definition of the "feed material" as far as
`
`19 the Catchpole patent goes.
`
`20 Q The question, though, I asked:
`
`21 Does Exhibit 1009 Catchpole
`
`22 specifically disclose "krill meal"?
`
`23 MR. CHAKANSKY: If you can answer
`
`24 without looking at the patent.
`
`25 A Yeah, two things I can -- two
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0014
`
`

`

`15
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 things say for certain without reading through
`
` 3 all the words.
`
` 4 Q Then feel free to read through it.
`
` 5 A Okay. I can read through and see
`
` 6 if the word "meal" itself appears; or maybe there
`
` 7 is a -- I don't know if there is a shortcut way
`
` 8 where someone can do a quick search for it.
`
` 9 But my second comment is, you know,
`
`10 regardless of whether the word "meal" itself
`
`11 appears, I mean, yes, I see that "krill meal" is
`
`12 a fairly standard kind of form for a krill
`
`13 starting material. It would be a reasonably
`
`14 obvious -- one of the options to use.
`
`15 Q Okay. But --
`
`16 A Sorry. To answer your question, am
`
`17 I going to read through the patent, or can
`
`18 someone do -- can someone do a word search?
`
`19 MR. CHAKANSKY: I just did a word
`
`20 search on an OCR'd dot version of this, and
`
`21 I could not find "meal" anywhere.
`
`22 A Okay. I am happy to go with that.
`
`23 The word "meal" doesn't appear in the Catchpole
`
`24 patent.
`
`25 Q And the words "krill meal" don't
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0015
`
`

`

`16
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 appear in the Catchpole patent either; do they?
`
` 3 A By association. Yes.
`
` 4 Q But Catchpole does describe --
`
` 5 okay. So going back to paragraph 30 of your
`
` 6 declaration, Exhibit 1086 --
`
` 7 A Okay.
`
` 8 Q -- is it your testimony that "krill
`
` 9 meal" as used in line two of 30, paragraph 30,
`
`10 means something different than "krill meal" as
`
`11 used in line four of paragraph 30?
`
`12 MR. CHAKANSKY: Objection to the
`
`13 form of the question.
`
`14 A But, yeah, that's correct. The
`
`15 "krill meal" in line two is referring
`
`16 specifically to the krill meal that was detailed
`
`17 in the -- or krill powder, if you like, that was
`
`18 used in example 18 of Catchpole.
`
`19 And my use of the term in the
`
`20 line -- in the fourth line is, yeah, a more
`
`21 general description of what takes into context
`
`22 the whole that the Catchpole patent, what it's
`
`23 describing.
`
`24 Q Let's go to Paragraph 32 of your
`
`25 declaration, Exhibit 1086.
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0016
`
`

`

`17
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 MR. CHAKANSKY: Could he read 31 as
`
` 3 well that leads into 32.
`
` 4 MR. JONES: Sure.
`
` 5 MR. CHAKANSKY: Okay. I think he's
`
` 6 ready.
`
` 7 A Okay.
`
` 8 Q Okay. So on Paragraph 32, it says:
`
` 9 "Krill meal disclosed in that
`
`10 example 18 meets all of these criteria."
`
`11 A I can see that.
`
`12 Q And is that referring to the
`
`13 "freeze dried krill powder" disclosed in
`
`14 example 18 of Exhibit 1009?
`
`15 A That's correct.
`
`16 Q So there -- is it correct to say
`
`17 then that you used the "freeze dried krill
`
`18 powder" as disclosed in example 18 of
`
`19 Exhibit 1009 interchangeably with the term "krill
`
`20 meal"?
`
`21 MR. CHAKANSKY: Objection.
`
`22 Misstates his testimony.
`
`23 A I am referring to the powder that's
`
`24 used in example 18 of Catchpole in this case as a
`
`25 "krill meal."
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0017
`
`

`

`18
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 Q Okay.
`
` 3 A Well, an example of the "krill
`
` 4 meal."
`
` 5 Q Okay. Let's move on to
`
` 6 Paragraph 33 of Exhibit 106, on page 0023.
`
` 7 A Okay.
`
` 8 Q And this paragraph provides some
`
` 9 quotes from Exhibit 1009, Catchpole, correct?
`
`10 A Correct.
`
`11 Q And I would like to direct your
`
`12 attention to the quote at the bottom of page 0023
`
`13 in paragraph 33 where it says:
`
`14 "Preferably, the product contains
`
`15 more acyl-alkyl [sic] phospholipids and/or
`
`16 plasmalogens in the feed material."
`
`17 Do you see that sentence?
`
`18 A I can see it. Yes.
`
`19 Q And does that sentence mean that
`
`20 the product can contain a higher mass of
`
`21 acyl-alkyl phospholipids and/or plasmalogens than
`
`22 the feed material?
`
`23 A What do you mean by a "higher
`
`24 mass"?
`
`25 Q Well, let's see if we can -- I am
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0018
`
`

`

`19
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 trying to understand what that sentence means.
`
` 3 So, say, for example, you had feed
`
` 4 material, 100 grams of feed material. And you
`
` 5 analyze it, and it -- so let's stick with just
`
` 6 phospholipid.
`
` 7 Okay. So, first off, let's just
`
` 8 stick with phospholipids.
`
` 9 Say you have 100 grams of feed
`
`10 material. And you analyze it, and it contains
`
`11 20 percent phospholipids.
`
`12 A Okay.
`
`13 Q Okay. So what would the mass of
`
`14 the phospholipids be in the feed material then?
`
`15 A 20 percent of 100 grams, I think
`
`16 you said would be --
`
`17 Q Yes.
`
`18 A -- nominally 20 grams of
`
`19 phospholipids.
`
`20 Q Okay. And say you make an extract
`
`21 of that feed material.
`
`22 A Okay.
`
`23 Q And you have a 50 percent yield,
`
`24 and it contains -- and you do the analysis, and
`
`25 it contains 60 percent by weight phospholipids.
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0019
`
`

`

`20
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 MR. CHAKANSKY: Objection.
`
` 3 Incomplete hypothetical.
`
` 4 Q What would the mass of
`
` 5 phospholipids be in the extract then?
`
` 6 A Yes, you wouldn't achieve that
`
` 7 combination of extract yield in composition out
`
` 8 of a -- that 100 grams of starting material that
`
` 9 you described. If -- I mean -- I mean, 50 grams
`
`10 of a lipid extract that has -- I think you said
`
`11 60 percent phospholipids -- that would be
`
`12 300 grams of phospholipids.
`
`13 Q 30 or 300?
`
`14 A 300 grams. Did I say 30?
`
`15 MR. CHAKANSKY: No.
`
`16 A 300.
`
`17 Q 60 percent of 50?
`
`18 A Yes. 30 grams, you are right.
`
`19 Yes, my apologies.
`
`20 Q So in the hypothetical that I just
`
`21 gave, the feed material has 20 grams of biomass
`
`22 of phospholipids. And then the extract you just
`
`23 calculated would have 30 grams of phospholipids;
`
`24 is that correct?
`
`25 MR. CHAKANSKY: Objection.
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0020
`
`

`

`21
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 Misstates his testimony. And incomplete
`
` 3 hypothetical.
`
` 4 A Would -- would it be useful if I
`
` 5 explain that -- what that sentence means that you
`
` 6 are talking about?
`
` 7 I mean, your -- your hypothetical,
`
` 8 you know, doesn't make sense. You are talking
`
` 9 about a -- I mean, yeah, the sentence here from
`
`10 Catchpole is not saying that you can start
`
`11 with --
`
`12 Q Well, let's stick with the
`
`13 hypothetical.
`
`14 MR. CHAKANSKY: Let him finish.
`
`15 Q Let's stick with the hypothetical
`
`16 first. Then we'll go to the sentence in
`
`17 Catchpole and clarify that.
`
`18 MR. CHAKANSKY: And he was
`
`19 answering when you interrupted him.
`
`20 So if you have anymore to say,
`
`21 please say it.
`
`22 A Yes. Your hypothetical, yes,
`
`23 obviously, it doesn't make sense that you can
`
`24 create an extract that has a greater amount of --
`
`25 a greater mass of a substance than was in the --
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0021
`
`

`

`22
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 in the material that it was derived from.
`
` 3 Q So is that impossible?
`
` 4 A Yes. That's impossible.
`
` 5 But -- so coming to the sentence in
`
` 6 Catchpole, I can explain what it means. It's
`
` 7 certainly not referring to that scenario.
`
` 8 Q Okay.
`
` 9 A The section quoted out of
`
`10 Catchpole -- in fact, the quote in my declaration
`
`11 goes on, and, I mean, the context is fairly clear
`
`12 from reading the rest of it.
`
`13 It's referring to -- I mean, it
`
`14 says contains more, in this case, acyl-alkyl
`
`15 phospholipids and/or plasmalogens. It's talking
`
`16 about the concentrations of those components in
`
`17 the -- in that extract fraction.
`
`18 And you can see immediately after
`
`19 that sentence it's talking about concentration,
`
`20 talking about, for example, 5 percent or in
`
`21 10 percent concentrations.
`
`22 Q And just to clarify, though, we are
`
`23 talking about the mass of the material or the
`
`24 weight, not the concentration.
`
`25 MR. CHAKANSKY: Objection.
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0022
`
`

`

`23
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 Misstates his testimony.
`
` 3 MR. JONES: I haven't even asked a
`
` 4 question yet.
`
` 5 MR. CHAKANSKY: You just -- go
`
` 6 ahead. I think you did.
`
` 7 Q So if we are talking about the mass
`
` 8 of phospholipids as opposed to the concentration
`
` 9 of phospholipids, it's impossible to have a
`
`10 greater mass of phospholipids in the extract than
`
`11 was in the starting material; is that correct?
`
`12 A That's certainly true that, in an
`
`13 extraction or separation process, you are not
`
`14 creating anything. You are just simply taking
`
`15 the mass of material that you start with and
`
`16 separating it into different fractions.
`
`17 So the fractions that you separate
`
`18 it into are going to contain -- you know, in the
`
`19 sum are going to contain the same amount of
`
`20 material as the starting material, both of which
`
`21 will be less than or equal to the amount of
`
`22 material that was in the starting material.
`
`23 MR. JONES: Want to take a break?
`
`24 MR. CHAKANSKY: Sure.
`
`25 (There was a discussion off the
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0023
`
`

`

`24
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 record.)
`
` 3 (A break is taken.)
`
` 4 CONTINUED EXAMINATION
`
` 5 BY MR. JONES:
`
` 6 Q So I'd like to direct your
`
` 7 attention to paragraph 92 of your declaration,
`
` 8 Exhibit 1086, which is page 0063.
`
` 9 A Okay.
`
`10 MR. CHAKANSKY: You should read it.
`
`11 Q And as long as you are reading,
`
`12 let's look at paragraph 91 as well, the top of
`
`13 the page.
`
`14 A Okay.
`
`15 Q Okay. So let's refer to paragraph
`
`16 91. There you see that you estimate the amount
`
`17 of neutral lipids in the feed to be 739 grams; is
`
`18 that correct?
`
`19 MR. CHAKANSKY: Objection to the
`
`20 form of the question.
`
`21 A Yes, in this case, the example I'm
`
`22 giving here describes a calculation showing a
`
`23 neutral lipid concentration of 739 grams.
`
`24 Q And is it correct to say that
`
`25 that -- that 739 grams is the estimated amount of
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0024
`
`

`

`25
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 neutral lipids in the feed material of example 18
`
` 3 of Catchpole?
`
` 4 MR. CHAKANSKY: Objection to the
`
` 5 form of the question.
`
` 6 A The context of the discussion
`
` 7 that's in the declaration, yep.
`
` 8 Q Okay. And example 18 of Catchpole
`
` 9 discloses that 650 grams of neutral lipids were
`
`10 extracted in the neat CO2 step; is that correct?
`
`11 MR. CHAKANSKY: He's just looking
`
`12 at it right now.
`
`13 Let the record reflect he's looking
`
`14 at Catchpole page 0024, example 18.
`
`15 A I think what you are asking is
`
`16 where the 650 grams is the mass of neutral
`
`17 lipid -- or at least substantially all neutral
`
`18 lipids that was extracted by Catchpole into
`
`19 extract one.
`
`20 Yes, that's correct.
`
`21 Q Okay. So then is it fair to say
`
`22 that you could divide 650 grams by 739 grams of
`
`23 neutral lipids, as you calculated in paragraph 91
`
`24 of your declaration, to determine the percentage
`
`25 of neutral lipids that were extracted in step one
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0025
`
`

`

`26
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 of Catchpole?
`
` 3 MR. CHAKANSKY: Objection to the
`
` 4 form of the question.
`
` 5 A You could divide 650 grams out of
`
` 6 Catchpole by the 739 grams estimated neutral
`
` 7 lipid content; and, yeah, you would get an
`
` 8 approximation of the proportion of the total
`
` 9 neutral lipid that was extracted.
`
`10 Q Then I calculate 650 divided by
`
`11 739 grams to be 0.879 percent or -- sorry --
`
`12 87.9 percent, which is rounded to 88 percent.
`
`13 Does that sound correct to you?
`
`14 MR. CHAKANSKY: You want to go and
`
`15 do it yourself or --
`
`16 A No, it sounds approximately
`
`17 correct, if you calculate the ratio of 650 to
`
`18 739.
`
`19 Q Do you want to calculate it or
`
`20 accept 88 percent?
`
`21 A No, I'm okay with the -- with that
`
`22 calculation.
`
`23 Q Okay. Let's move on to
`
`24 paragraph 92.
`
`25 A Okay.
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0026
`
`

`

`27
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 Q There in the first sentence you
`
` 3 state that:
`
` 4 "The total" -- "As the total weight
`
` 5 of extract two was 242 grams, the amount of
`
` 6 neutrals in extract two was 37 percent or
`
` 7 89 grams over 242 grams."
`
` 8 Do you see that?
`
` 9 MR. CHAKANSKY: But he also has
`
`10 more to that sentence, so I'll object to
`
`11 the form.
`
`12 A But, yes, I can see that text in
`
`13 the -- in paragraph 92.
`
`14 Q And in the last sentence of
`
`15 paragraph 91, you state that the neutral lipids
`
`16 in extract two was 89 grams weight -- okay.
`
`17 Let's strike that.
`
`18 Okay. So the last sentence of
`
`19 paragraph 91 of your declaration says:
`
`20 "Thus, the neutral lipids in
`
`21 extract two was 89 grams (739 grams minus
`
`22 650 grams) weight for weight krill oil."
`
`23 Do you see that sentence?
`
`24 A I can see it. The -- it looks like
`
`25 a typographical point. It should be that the --
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2026 PAGE 0027
`
`

`

`28
`
`
` 1 TALLON
`
` 2 yeah -- the extract two was -- it's a finite
`
` 3 extract.
`
` 4 So it should just be describing
`
` 5 that 89 grams is the amount of neutral lipid in
`
` 6 that extract two, so probably strike the "weight
`
` 7 for weight krill oil" -- would be -- would be a
`
` 8 better description of what it means.
`
` 9 Q Yeah, I agree. I agree.
`
`10 So the amount of neutral lipids in
`
`11 extract two is calculated to be 89 grams; is that
`
`12 correct?
`
`13 MR. CHAKANSKY: Objection to the
`
`14 form of the question. Lack of foundation.
`
`15 A In the context of what's described
`
`16 in my declaration and in this particular
`
`17 calculation, 89 grams is the -- the neutral lipid
`
`18 content.
`
`19 Q Okay. And, now, I would like to
`
`20 direct your attention to paragraph 100 of your
`
`21 declaration on page 067, with Exhibit 1086.
`
`22 A Okay.
`
`23 Q And there you state that table 16
`
`24 discloses that extract two weighs 242 grams,
`
`25 correct?
`
`AKER EXHIBI

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket