throbber
n⫺3 Polyunsaturated fatty acids, inflammation, and inflammatory
`diseases1–3
`
`Downloaded from
`
`ajcn.nutrition.org
`
` by guest on October 12, 2017
`
`endothelial cells, which allows leukocyte binding and subse-
`quent diapedesis. The earliest cells to appear at inflamed sites are
`granulocytes, with monocytes, macrophages, and lymphocytes
`appearing later. Granulocytes, monocytes, and macrophages are
`involved in pathogen killing, in clearing up cellular and tissue
`debris, and in tissue repair. The activity of these cells is induced
`by certain triggers. One important exogenous trigger is bacterial
`endotoxin (also known as lipopolysaccharide), a component of
`the cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria, which can directly ac-
`tivate monocytes and macrophages, inducing them to form cy-
`tokines, such as tumor necrosis factor ␣(TNF-␣); interleukin 1
`(IL-1), IL-6, and IL-8; eicosanoids, such as prostaglandin (PG)
`E2; nitric oxide; matrix metalloproteinases; and other mediators.
`Endotoxin also induces adhesion molecule expression on the
`surface of endothelial cells and leukocytes.
`The cytokines produced by monocytes and macrophages also
`serve to regulate the whole-body response to infection and injury
`(Figure 1). Thus, inflammation and the inflammatory response
`are part of the normal, innate immune response. Inflammatory
`mediators also provide a link between innate and acquired im-
`mune responses (Figure 1). The actions of inflammatory cyto-
`kines, which initiate a cascade of inflammatory mediators, thus
`amplifying the initial inflammatory signal, are opposed by anti-
`inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and by receptor antago-
`nists such as IL-1 receptor antagonist.
`Although inflammation is a normal response, when it occurs in
`an uncontrolled or inappropriate manner, excessive damage to
`host tissues and disease can ensue. Such uncontrolled or inap-
`propriate inflammatory responses are characterized by hyper-
`expression of endothelial and leukocyte adhesion molecules,
`appearance of soluble forms of adhesion molecules in the circu-
`lation, sequestration of leukocytes to sites where they are not
`usually found, production of inflammatory mediators, and dam-
`age to host tissues (Figure 2). High concentrations of TNF-␣,
`IL-1␤, and IL-6 are particularly destructive and are implicated in
`some of the pathologic responses that occur in endotoxic shock,
`in acute respiratory distress syndrome, and in chronic inflamma-
`tory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory
`
`1 From the Institute of Human Nutrition, School of Medicine, University
`of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
`2 Presented at the symposium “nҀ3 Fatty Acids: Recommendations for
`Therapeutics and Prevention,” held at the Institute of Human Nutrition,
`Columbia University, New York, NY, 21 May 2005.
`3 Address reprint requests to PC Calder, Institute of Human Nutrition,
`School of Medicine, University of Southampton, Bassett Crescent East,
`Southampton SO16 7PX, United Kingdom. E-mail: pcc@soton.ac.uk.
`
`Philip C Calder
`
`ABSTRACT
`Inflammation is part of the normal host response to infection and
`injury. However, excessive or inappropriate inflammation contrib-
`utes to a range of acute and chronic human diseases and is charac-
`terized by the production of inflammatory cytokines, arachidonic
`acid– derived eicosanoids (prostaglandins, thromboxanes, leukotri-
`enes, and other oxidized derivatives), other inflammatory agents (eg,
`reactive oxygen species), and adhesion molecules. At sufficiently
`high intakes, long-chain nҀ3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs),
`as found in oily fish and fish oils, decrease the production of inflam-
`matory eicosanoids, cytokines, and reactive oxygen species and the
`expression of adhesion molecules. Long-chain nҀ3 PUFAs act both
`directly (eg, by replacing arachidonic acid as an eicosanoid substrate
`and inhibiting arachidonic acid metabolism) and indirectly (eg, by
`altering the expression of inflammatory genes through effects on
`transcription factor activation). Long-chain nҀ3 PUFAs also give
`rise to a family of antiinflammatory mediators termed resolvins.
`Thus, nҀ3 PUFAs are potentially potent antiinflammatory agents.
`As such, they may be of therapeutic use in a variety of acute and
`chronic inflammatory settings. Evidence of their clinical efficacy is
`reasonably strong in some settings (eg, in rheumatoid arthritis) but is
`weak in others (eg, in inflammatory bowel diseases and asthma).
`More, better designed, and larger trials are required to assess the
`therapeutic potential of long-chain nҀ3 PUFAs in inflammatory
`diseases. The precursor nҀ3 PUFA ␣-linolenic acid does not appear
`to exert antiinflammatory effects at achievable intakes.
`Am J
`Clin Nutr 2006;83(suppl):1505S–19S.
`
`KEY WORDS
`Inflammation, monocyte, macrophage, eico-
`sanoid, cytokine, inflammatory disease
`
`INFLAMMATION IN HEALTH AND DISEASE
`Inflammation is part of the body’s immediate response to
`infection or injury. It is typified by redness, swelling, heat, and
`pain. These occur as a result of increased blood flow; increased
`permeability across blood capillaries, which permits large mol-
`ecules (eg, complement, antibodies, and cytokines) to leave the
`bloodstream and cross the endothelial wall; and increased move-
`ment of leukocytes from the bloodstream into the surrounding
`tissue. Inflammation functions to begin the immunologic process
`of elimination of invading pathogens and toxins and to repair
`damaged tissue. These responses must be ordered and controlled.
`The movement of cells into the inflammatory or infected site is
`induced by the up-regulation of adhesion molecules such as
`intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhe-
`sion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), and E-selectin on the surface of
`
`Am J Clin Nutr 2006;83(suppl):1505S–19S. Printed in USA. © 2006 American Society for Nutrition
`
`1505S
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2005 Page 1
`
`

`

`1506S
`
`CALDER
`
`Downloaded from
`
`ajcn.nutrition.org
`
` by guest on October 12, 2017
`
`FIGURE 1. The role of inflammatory cells and mediators in regulating the whole-body metabolic and immunologic responses to infection and injury.
`Modified from reference 1 with permission from the American Oil Chemists’ Society.
`
`bowel disease. Chronic overproduction of TNF-␣and IL-1 can
`cause adipose tissue and muscle wasting and loss of bone mass
`and may account for alterations in body composition and tissue
`loss seen in inflammatory diseases and in cancer cachexia. As
`well as its clear and obvious association with classic inflamma-
`tory diseases, inflammation is now recognized to play an impor-
`tant role in the pathology of other diseases, such as cardiovas-
`cular disease and neurodegenerative diseases of aging.
`Additionally, the realization that adipose tissue is a source of
`inflammatory cytokines has given rise to the notion that obesity,
`the metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes have an inflamma-
`tory component.
`
`FIGURE 2. Diagrammatic representation of the movement of leukocytes
`through the endothelium and the subsequent generation of inflammatory
`mediators.
`
`ARACHIDONIC ACID–DERIVED EICOSANOIDS AND
`INFLAMMATION
`The key link between polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs)
`and inflammation is that eicosanoids, which are among the me-
`diators and regulators of inflammation, are generated from 20-
`carbon PUFAs. Because inflammatory cells typically contain a
`high proportion of the nҀ6 PUFA arachidonic acid (20:4nҀ6)
`and low proportions of other 20-carbon PUFAs, arachidonic acid
`is usually the major substrate for eicosanoid synthesis. Eico-
`sanoids, which include PGs, thromboxanes, leukotrienes (LTs),
`and other oxidized derivatives, are generated from arachidonic
`acid by the metabolic processes summarized in Figure 3. Eico-
`sanoids are involved in modulating the intensity and duration of
`inflammatory responses (see references 2 and 3 for reviews),
`have cell- and stimulus-specific sources, and frequently have
`opposing effects (Table 1). Thus, the overall physiologic (or
`pathophysiologic) outcome will depend on the cells present, the
`nature of the stimulus, the timing of eicosanoid generation, the
`concentrations of different eicosanoids generated, and the sen-
`sitivity of the target cells and tissues to the eicosanoids generated.
`Recent studies have shown that PGE2 induces cyclooxygenase 2
`(COX-2) in fibroblasts cells and so up-regulates its own produc-
`tion (5), induces the production of IL-6 by macrophages (5),
`inhibits 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX) and so decreases production of
`the 4-series LTs (6), and induces 15-LOX and so promotes the
`formation of lipoxins (6, 7), which have been found to have
`antiinflammatory effects (8, 9). Thus, PGE2 possesses both pro-
`and antiinflammatory actions (Table 1).
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2005 Page 2
`
`

`

`nҀ3 PUFAs AND INFLAMMATION
`
`1507S
`
`Downloaded from
`
`ajcn.nutrition.org
`
` by guest on October 12, 2017
`
`FIGURE 3. Generalized pathway for the conversion of arachidonic acid to eicosanoids. COX, cyclooxygenase; HETE, hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid;
`HPETE, hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acid; LOX, lipoxygenase; LT, leukotriene; PG, prostaglandin; TX, thromboxane.
`
`ARACHIDONIC ACID AND INFLAMMATORY
`MEDIATOR PRODUCTION
`Animal feeding studies have shown a strong positive relation
`between the amount of arachidonic acid in inflammatory cells
`and the ability of those cells to produce eicosanoids such as PGE2
`(10). In turn, the amount of arachidonic acid in inflammatory
`cells can be increased by including arachidonic acid in the diet of
`rats (10) or by increasing the amount of it in the diet of humans
`
`TABLE 1
`Pro- and antiinflammatory effects of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and
`leukotriene B4 (LTB4)1
`
`PGE2
`Proinflammatory
`Induces fever
`Increases vascular permeability
`Increases vasodilatation
`Causes pain
`Enhances pain caused by other agents
`Increases production of IL-6
`Antiinflammatory
`Inhibits production of TNF and IL-1
`Inhibits 5-LOX (decreases 4-series LT production)
`Induces 15-LOX (increases lipoxin production)
`LTB4
`Proinflammatory
`Increases vascular permeability
`Enhances local blood flow
`Chemotactic agent for leukocytes
`Induces release of lysosomal enzymes
`Induces release of reactive oxygen species by granulocytes
`Increases production of TNF, IL-1, and IL-6
`
`1 IL, interleukin; LOX, lipoxygenase; TNF, tumor necrosis factor. Mod-
`ified from reference 4 with permission from the American Oil Chemists’
`Society.
`
`(11). The amount of arachidonic acid in inflammatory cells
`may also be influenced by dietary intake of its precursor,
`linoleic acid (18:2nҀ6), although the range of linoleic acid
`intake over which this relation occurs has not been defined for
`humans. Increasing linoleic acid intake by 6.5 g/d in humans
`who habitually consume 10 –15 g/d did not alter the arachi-
`donic acid content of blood mononuclear cells (12). Never-
`theless, the role of arachidonic acid as a precursor for the
`synthesis of eicosanoids indicates the potential for dietary
`nҀ6 PUFAs (linoleic or arachidonic acid) to influence in-
`flammatory processes. This has been little investigated in
`humans. Supplementation of the diet of healthy young men
`with 1.5 g arachidonic acid/d for 7 wk resulted in a marked
`increase in production of PGE2 and LTB4 by endotoxin-
`stimulated mononuclear cells (13). However, production of
`TNF-␣, IL-1␤, and IL-6 by these cells was not significantly
`altered (13). Thus, increased arachidonic acid intake may
`result in changes indicative of selectively increased inflam-
`mation or inflammatory responses in humans. Supplementa-
`tion of the diet of healthy elderly subjects with arachidonic
`acid [0.7 g/d in addition to a habitual intake of 앒0.15 g/d (11)]
`for 12 wk did not affect endotoxin-stimulated production of
`TNF-␣, IL-1␤, or IL-6 by mononuclear cells; did not alter
`reactive oxygen species (superoxide) production by neutro-
`phils or monocytes; and did not alter plasma soluble
`VCAM-1, ICAM-1, or E-selectin concentrations (14). This
`lack of effect was despite incorporation of arachidonic acid
`into target cells (11). Taken together, these studies suggest
`that modestly increased intake of arachidonic acid results in
`incorporation of arachidonic acid into cells involved in in-
`flammatory responses (11), but that this does not affect the
`production of inflammatory cytokines (13, 14), the generation
`of superoxide (14), or the shedding of adhesion molecules
`(14), although production of inflammatory eicosanoids is in-
`creased (13).
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2005 Page 3
`
`

`

`1508S
`
`CALDER
`
`Downloaded from
`
`ajcn.nutrition.org
`
` by guest on October 12, 2017
`
`EPA can also act as a substrate for both COX and 5-LOX, giving
`rise to eicosanoids with a slightly different structure from those
`formed from arachidonic acid (Figure 5). Thus, fish oil supplemen-
`tation of the human diet has been shown to result in increased pro-
`duction of LTB5, LTE5, and 5-hydroxyeicosapentaenoic acid by
`inflammatory cells (15, 17, 23), although generation of PGE3 has
`been more difficult to demonstrate (25). The functional significance
`of this is that the mediators formed from EPA are believed to be less
`potent than those formed from arachidonic acid. For example, LTB5
`is 10- to 100-fold less potent as a neutrophil chemotactic agent than
`LTB4 (26, 27). Recent studies have compared the effects of PGE2
`and PGE3 on production of cytokines by cell lines and by human
`cells. Bagga et al (5) reported that PGE3 was a less potent inducer of
`COX-2 gene expression in fibroblasts and of IL-6 production by
`macrophages. However, PGE2 and PGE3 had equivalent inhibitory
`effects on the production of TNF-␣ (28, 29) and IL-1␤ (29) by
`human mononuclear cells stimulated with endotoxin. The reduction
`in generation of arachidonic acid–derived mediators that accompa-
`nies fish oil consumption has led to the idea that fish oil is antiin-
`flammatory (Figure 6).
`In addition to long-chain nҀ3 PUFAs modulating the gener-
`ation of eicosanoids from arachidonic acid and to EPA acting as
`a substrate for the generation of alternative eicosanoids, recent
`studies have identified a novel group of mediators, termed
`E-series resolvins, formed from EPA by COX-2 that appear to
`exert antiinflammatory actions (30 –32). In addition, DHA-
`derived mediators termed D-series resolvins, docosatrienes and
`neuroprotectins, also produced by COX-2, have been identified
`and also appear to be antiinflammatory (33–35). This is an ex-
`citing new area of nҀ3 fatty acids and inflammatory mediators
`and the implications for a variety of conditions may be of great
`importance. This area was recently reviewed (36, 37).
`
`ANTIINFLAMMATORY EFFECTS OF LONG-CHAIN
`nⴚ3 PUFAs OTHER THAN ALTERED EICOSANOID
`PRODUCTION
`Although their action in antagonizing arachidonic acid metab-
`olism is a key antiinflammatory effect of nҀ3 PUFAs, these fatty
`
`FIGURE 4. Relation between tuna oil consumption and the fatty acid
`content of human neutrophils. Healthy male volunteers consumed differing
`amounts of tuna oil in capsules for 12 wk. Neutrophils were isolated before
`and at the end of the intervention period, and the fatty acid composition of
`their phospholipids determined. The mean changes in the proportions of
`arachidonic acid, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and eicosapentaenoic acid
`(EPA) were linearly related to the increase in tuna oil consumption (g/d). Data
`are from reference 20.
`
`LONG-CHAIN nⴚ3 PUFAs AND INFLAMMATORY
`EICOSANOID PRODUCTION
`Increased consumption of long-chain nҀ3 PUFAs, such as
`eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA; 20:5n-3) and docosahexaenoic acid
`(DHA; 22:6n-3), results in increased proportions of those fatty
`acids in inflammatory cell phospholipids (12, 15–20). The in-
`corporation of EPA and DHA into human inflammatory cells
`occurs in a dose-response fashion and is partly at the expense of
`arachidonic acid (Figure 4). Because less substrate is available
`for synthesis of eicosanoids from arachidonic acid, fish oil sup-
`plementation of the human diet has been shown to result in
`decreased production of PGE2 (16, 19, 21, 22), thromboxane B2
`(19), LTB4 (15, 17), 5-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (15, 17),
`and LTE4 (23) by inflammatory cells. Although these studies
`used fish oil, Kelley et al (24) showed that 6 g DHA/d resulted in
`decreased production of PGE2 (by 60%) and LTB4 (by 75%) by
`endotoxin-stimulated mononuclear cells.
`
`FIGURE 5. Generalized pathway for the conversion of eicosapentaenoic acid to eicosanoids. COX, cyclooxygenase; HEPE, hydroxyeicosapentaenoic acid;
`HPEPE, hydroperoxyeicosapentaenoic acid; LOX, lipoxygenase; LT, leukotriene; PG, prostaglandin; TX, thromboxane.
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2005 Page 4
`
`

`

`nҀ3 PUFAs AND INFLAMMATION
`
`1509S
`
`Downloaded from
`
`ajcn.nutrition.org
`
` by guest on October 12, 2017
`
`dose-response study by Schmidt et al (41) suggests that near-
`maximum inhibition of chemotaxis occurs at an intake of 1.3 g
`EPAѿDHA/d. A lower intake (0.55 g EPAѿDHA/d) did not
`affect monocyte chemotaxis (42). However, Healy et al (20) did
`not find an effect of several doses of fish oil providing up to 2.25 g
`EPAѿDHA/d on neutrophil chemotaxis. The apparently diver-
`gent reports of Schmidt et al (42) and Healy et al (20) could be
`explained by the fact that the latter study used a low-EPA, high-
`DHA fish oil such that the highest dose provided 0.58 g EPA/d,
`which is less than the amount of EPA provided by the lowest dose
`of fish oil used by Schmidt et al. If this is so, then the anti-
`chemotactic effects of fish oil might be due to EPA rather than
`DHA. No studies have attempted to discriminate the effects of
`EPA and DHA on chemotaxis.
`
`Long-chain nⴚ3 PUFAs and adhesion molecule
`expression
`Cell culture (43– 46) and animal feeding studies (47) report
`decreased expression of some adhesion molecules on the surface
`of monocytes (46), macrophages (47), or endothelial cells (43–
`45) after exposure to long-chain nҀ3 PUFAs. Supplementing the
`diet of healthy humans with fish oil providing 앒1.5 g
`EPAѿDHA/d results in a lower level of expression of ICAM-1
`on the surface of blood monocytes stimulated ex vivo with
`interferon-␥(48). Dietary fish oil providing 1.1 g EPAѿDHA/d
`was found to decrease circulating concentrations of soluble
`VCAM-1 in elderly subjects (49), but it is not clear whether this
`represents decreased surface expression of VCAM-1.
`
`Long-chain nⴚ3 PUFAs and reactive oxygen species
`production
`Supplementation studies providing 3.1– 8.4 g EPAѿDHA/d
`have reported 30 –55% decreases in the production of reactive
`oxygen species (superoxide or hydrogen peroxide) by stimulated
`human neutrophils
`(50 –52). Supplementation with 6 g
`EPAѿDHA/d was shown to decrease hydrogen peroxide pro-
`duction by human monocytes (53). Studies using lower doses of
`long-chain nҀ3 PUFAs (0.55–2.3 g/d) failed to demonstrate
`
`FIGURE 6. Classic mechanism of the antiinflammatory action of long-
`chain nҀ3 fatty acids. Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic
`acid (DHA) decrease the amounts of arachidonic acid available as a substrate
`for eicosanoid synthesis and also inhibit the metabolism of arachidonic acid.
`COX, cyclooxygenase; LOX, lipoxygenase; LT, leukotriene; PG, prosta-
`glandin; TX, thromboxane.
`
`acids have several other antiinflammatory effects that might re-
`sult from altered eicosanoid production or might be independent
`of this. For example, studies have shown that, when consumed in
`sufficient quantities, dietary fish oil results in decreased leuko-
`cyte chemotaxis, decreased production of reactive oxygen spe-
`cies and proinflammatory cytokines, and decreased adhesion
`molecule expression (Table 2).
`
`Long-chain nⴚ3 PUFAs and leukocyte chemotaxis
`Several dietary supplementation studies that used between 3.1
`and 14.4 g EPAѿDHA/d have shown a time-dependent decrease
`in chemotaxis of human neutrophils and monocytes toward var-
`ious chemoattractants, including LTB4, bacterial peptides, and
`human serum (15–17, 38 – 40). Both the distance of cell migra-
`tion and the number of cells migrating were decreased. Despite
`the high dose of long-chain nҀ3 PUFAs used in these studies, a
`
`TABLE 2
`Summary of the antiinflammatory effects of long-chain nҀ3 fatty acids1
`
`Antiinflammatory effect
`Decreased generation of arachidonic acid–derived
`eicosanoids (many with inflammatory actions)
`Increased generation of EPA-derived eicosanoids
`(many with less inflammatory actions than
`those produced from arachidonic acid)
`Increased generation of EPA and DHA-derived
`resolvins (with antiinflammatory actions)
`Decreased generation of inflammatory cytokines
`(TNF-␣, IL-1␤, IL-6, and IL-8)
`
`Decreased expression of adhesion molecules
`
`Decreased leukocyte chemotaxis
`Decreased generation of reactive oxygen species
`
`Mechanism likely to be involved
`Decreased arachidonic acid in cell membrane phospholipids; inhibition of arachidonic acid
`metabolism; decreased induction of COX-2, 5-LOX, and 5-LOX activating protein
`Increased content of EPA in cell membrane phospholipids
`
`Increased content of EPA and DHA in cell membrane phospholipids
`
`Decreased activation of NF␬B (via decreased phosphorylation of I␬B); activation of PPAR␥;
`altered activity of other transcription factors; differential effects of arachidonic acid– vs EPA-
`derived eicosanoids
`Decreased activation of NF␬B (via decreased phosphorylation of I␬B); altered activity of other
`transcription factors
`Not clear; perhaps decreased expression of receptors for some chemoattractants
`Not clear; perhaps altered membrane composition affecting signaling processes
`
`1 COX, cyclooxygenase; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; I␬B, inhibitory subunit of NF␬B; IL, interleukin; LOX, lipoxygenase;
`NF␬B, nuclear factor ␬B; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; TNF, tumor necrosis factor. Modified from reference 4 with permission from the
`American Oil Chemists’ Society.
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2005 Page 5
`
`

`

`1510S
`
`CALDER
`
`Downloaded from
`
`ajcn.nutrition.org
`
` by guest on October 12, 2017
`
`FIGURE 7. Inverse relation between the eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)
`content of human mononuclear cells and the production of tumor necrosis
`factor ␣(TNF␣) and interleukin 1␤(IL-1␤). Healthy male volunteers con-
`sumed various combinations of sunflower oil, flaxseed oil, and fish oil re-
`sulting in various EPA levels in blood mononuclear cells. The mononuclear
`cells were isolated and stimulated ex vivo with endotoxin for 24 h. The total
`intra- and extracellular accumulation of TNF-␣and IL-1␤was measured by
`specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The concentration of each
`inflammatory cytokine was inversely related to the EPA content of the mono-
`nuclear cells. Reproduced from reference 19 with permission.
`
`and cytokines. The roles of nҀ6 and nҀ3 PUFAs in shaping and
`regulating inflammatory processes and responses suggest that
`the balance of these fatty acids might be important in determining
`the development and severity of inflammatory diseases. For ex-
`ample, a high intake of nҀ6 PUFAs, especially arachidonic acid,
`could contribute to inflammatory processes and so could predis-
`pose to or exacerbate inflammatory diseases. Conversely, the
`recognition that the long-chain nҀ3 PUFAs have antiinflamma-
`tory actions suggests that increasing their intake by patients with
`inflammatory diseases, for example, through dietary supplemen-
`tation, may be of clinical benefit. Possible therapeutic targets for
`long-chain nҀ3 PUFAs are listed in Table 3. Supplementation
`trials have been conducted for most of these diseases. Those trials
`dealing with rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases
`(Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis), and asthma will be re-
`viewed in some detail here. This is because a larger number of
`trials have been conducted for these diseases or because the
`evidence of benefit is strongest in these diseases.
`
`effects on reactive oxygen species production by either neutro-
`phils (14, 20, 54, 55) or monocytes (14, 42, 54, 55). A study by
`Halvorsen et al (56) reported that 3.8 g of either EPA or DHA per
`day did not affect production of hydrogen peroxide by human
`monocytes. This lack of effect might relate either to the different
`stimulus used in this study (Escherichia coli) compared with the
`other “high” dose study with monocytes (latex beads) (53) or to
`the fact that 3.8 g long-chain nҀ3 PUFAs/d is below and 6 g/d is
`above the threshold that affects hydrogen peroxide production by
`monocytes.
`
`Long-chain nⴚ3 PUFAs and inflammatory cytokine
`production
`Cell culture studies show that EPA and DHA can inhibit the
`production of IL-1␤and TNF-␣by monocytes (57– 60) and the
`production of IL-6 and IL-8 by venous endothelial cells (43, 61).
`Fish oil feeding decreases the ex vivo production of TNF-␣,
`IL-1␤, and IL-6 by rodent macrophages (62– 64). Supplementa-
`tion of the diet of healthy humans with fish oil providing 쏜2 g
`EPAѿDHA/d was shown to decrease the production of TNF or
`IL-1 or IL-6 by mononuclear cells in some studies (16, 19, 21,
`65– 67). Caughey et al (19) reported a significant inverse corre-
`lation between the EPA content of mononuclear cells and the
`ability of those cells to produce TNF-␣and IL-1␤in response to
`endotoxin (Figure 7). Kelley et al (24) showed that 6 g DHA/d
`for 12 wk resulted in decreased production of TNF-␣(by 20%)
`and IL-1␤(by 35%) by endotoxin-stimulated mononuclear cells.
`Thus, although most studies have used fish oil, it appears that
`both EPA (19) and DHA (24) can decrease inflammatory cyto-
`kine production. This is confirmed by a study in which persons
`with type 2 diabetes were given 4 g EPA or DHA/d for 6 wk (68).
`Both EPA and DHA resulted in decreased plasma TNF-␣ con-
`centrations, although DHA was more potent (35% reduction
`compared with 20% for EPA). Note, however, that several other
`studies failed to show effects of dietary long-chain nҀ3 PUFAs
`on the production of inflammatory cytokines in humans. Some of
`these studies provided 쏝2 g EPAѿDHA/d (14, 42, 54, 69, 70),
`although others provided higher doses (12, 55, 71–74). It is not
`clear what the reason for these discrepancies in the literature is,
`but technical factors are likely to contribute (75). The relative
`contributions of EPA and DHA might also be important in de-
`termining the effect of fish oil. One other factor that was recently
`identified is polymorphisms in genes affecting cytokine produc-
`tion (76). It was found that the effect of dietary fish oil on cyto-
`kine production by human mononuclear cells was dependent on
`the nature of the Ҁ308 TNF-␣ and the ѿ252 TNF-␤ polymor-
`phisms. This study raises the possibility of being able to identify
`those who are more likely and those who are less likely to expe-
`rience specific antiinflammatory effects of fish oil.
`
`CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF THE
`ANTIINFLAMMATORY EFFECTS OF LONG-CHAIN
`nⴚ3 PUFAs
`
`Introductory comments
`Inflammation is an overt or covert component of numerous
`human conditions and diseases. Although the inflammation may
`afflict different body compartments, one common characteristic
`of these conditions and diseases is excessive or inappropriate
`production of inflammatory mediators, including eicosanoids
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2005 Page 6
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`ajcn.nutrition.org
`
` by guest on October 12, 2017
`
`nҀ3 PUFAs AND INFLAMMATION
`
`1511S
`
`TABLE 3
`Diseases and conditions with an inflammatory component in which long-
`chain nҀ3 fatty acids might be of benefit1
`
`Disease
`
`Rheumatoid arthritis
`Crohn disease
`Ulcerative colitis
`Lupus
`Type 1 diabetes
`Type 2 diabetes
`Cystic fibrosis
`Childhood asthma
`Adult asthma
`Allergic disease
`Psoriasis
`Multiple sclerosis
`Neurodegenerative disease of aging
`Atherosclerosis
`Acute cardiovascular events
`Obesity
`Systemic inflammatory response to surgery, trauma,
`and critical illness
`Acute respiratory distress syndrome
`Cancer cachexia
`
`1 Note: the list is not exhaustive.
`
`Reference to the role
`of inflammation
`
`(77)
`(78)
`(78)
`(79)
`(80)
`(80, 81)
`(82)
`(83)
`(84)
`(85)
`(86)
`(87)
`(87, 88)
`(89, 90)
`(90, 91)
`(92)
`(93)
`
`(94)
`(95)
`
`Rheumatoid arthritis
`Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease char-
`acterized by joint inflammation that manifests as swelling, pain,
`functional impairment, morning stiffness, osteoporosis, and
`muscle wasting. Joint lesions are characterized by infiltration of
`activated macrophages, T lymphocytes, and plasma cells into the
`synovium (the tissue lining the joints) and by proliferation of
`synovial cells called synoviocytes. Synovial biopsies from pa-
`tients with rheumatoid arthritis contain high concentrations of
`TNF-␣, IL-1␤, IL-6, IL-8, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-
`stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and synovial cells cultured ex vivo
`produce TNF-␣, IL-1␤, IL-6, IL-8, and GM-CSF for extended
`periods of time without additional stimulus (77). COX-2 expres-
`sion is increased in the synovium of rheumatoid arthritis patients,
`and in the joint tissues in rat models of arthritis (96). PGE2, LTB4,
`5-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid, and platelet-activating factor
`are found in the synovial fluid of patients with active rheumatoid
`arthritis (97). The efficacy of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory
`drugs in rheumatoid arthritis indicates the importance of proin-
`flammatory COX pathway products in the pathophysiology of
`the disease. Increased expression of E-selectin, VCAM-1, and
`ICAM-1 is found in patients with arthritis, and blocking ICAM-1
`or VCAM-1 with antibodies reduces leukocyte infiltration into
`the synovium and synovial inflammation in animal models of the
`disease (see 98 for references).
`Dietary fish oil has been shown to have beneficial effects in
`animal models of arthritis. For example, compared with feeding
`vegetable oil, feeding mice fish oil delayed the onset (mean: 34 d
`compared with 25 d) and reduced the incidence (69% compared
`with 93%) and severity (mean peak severity score: 6.7 compared
`with 9.8) of type II collagen-induced arthritis (99). Both EPA and
`DHA suppressed streptococcal cell wall–induced arthritis in rats,
`but EPA was more effective (100).
`
`Several studies have reported antiinflammatory effects of fish
`oil in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, such as decreased LTB4
`production by neutrophils (101–104) and monocytes (103, 105),
`decreased IL-1 production by monocytes (106), decreased
`plasma IL-1␤concentrations (107), decreased serum C-reactive
`protein concentrations (101), and normalization of the neutrophil
`chemotactic response (108). Several randomized, placebo-
`controlled, double-blind studies of fish oil in rheumatoid arthritis
`have been reported. The characteristics and findings of these
`trials are summarized in Table 4. The dose of long-chain nҀ3
`PUFAs used in these trials was between 1.6 and 7.1 g/d and
`averaged 앒3.5 g/d. Almost all of these trials showed some ben-
`efit of fish oil. Such benefits included reduced duration of morn-
`ing stiffness, reduced number of tender or swollen joints, reduced
`joint pain, reduced time to fatigue, increased grip strength, and
`decreased use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (Table 4).
`Arachidonic acid may contribute to inflammatory processes
`by acting as a precursor to eicosanoids known to have a role in
`rheumatoid arthritis (77, 78). Additionally, long-chain nҀ3
`PUFAs may act as antiinflammatory agents by competing with
`arachidonic acid for incorporation into inflammatory cell mem-
`branes and for metabolism by enzymes of eicosanoid synthesis.
`Thus, it is possible that greater efficacy of nҀ3 PUFAs may be
`achieved in rheumatoid arthritis by simultaneously decreasing
`nҀ6 PUFA intake, especially that of arachidonic acid. This was
`investigated by Adam et al (116). Fish oil, providing 4.2 g EPA
`ѿ DHA/d, or placebo was given to patients against a background
`of a typical Western diet, providing 0.1– 0.25 g arachidonic ac-
`id/d, or of a diet that restricted the intake of arachidonic acid–rich
`foods (meat, egg yolk, etc) and that provided 0.025– 0.09 g ara-
`chidonic acid/d; the latter diet was termed an antiinflammatory
`diet. The fish oil–induced decreases in plasma concentrations of
`thromboxane A2 and LTB4 and the urinary concentration of PG
`metabolites were greater in patients consuming the antiinflam-
`matory diet than in those consuming the Western diet. The re-
`ductions in the number of swollen joints, number of tender joints,
`patient’s global assessment, physician’s global assessment, and
`patient’s assessment of pain seen with fish oil supplementation
`were all also greater for patients consuming the antiinflammatory
`diet (116). Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use declined in
`patients receiving fish oil against the background of the antiin-
`flammatory diet but not against the background of the Western
`diet.
`Several reviews of the trials of fish oil in rheumatoid arthritis
`have been published (121–126), and each concluded that there is
`benefit from fish oil. In an editorial commentary discussing the
`use of fish oil in rheumatoid arthritis, it was concluded that “the
`findings of benefit from fish

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket