throbber
 7KLVPDWHULDOPD\EHSURWHFWHGE\&RS\ULJKWODZ7LWOH86&RGH
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2002 Page 1
`
`

`

`30302 Extraction of Oils from Antarctic Krill
`
`J. Agric. Food Chem, Vol. 34, No. 5, 1986
`
`905
`
`Table I. Proximate Composition of Krill Samples
`/_———_.—'_—‘
`(as Percentage of Total)
`frozen
`freeze-dried
`kr1ll
`krill
`krill
`mean
`77.7 '
`7.83
`1.75
`14.0
`52.0
`60.7
`3.01
`16.7
`11.5
`2.74
`12.2
`13.4
`97.5
`88.7
`87.4
`
`moisture
`protein“
`fat
`ash
`total
`
`.
`
`L
`
`' “Total nitrogen was multiplied by 6.25.
`
`Table II. Yields of Oils Extracted from Krill Samples With
`supercritical Carbon Dioxide
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`Yieldsofoils(gr/100,9sample)
`
`-15
`
`
`
`Freeze-dried
`krill
`
`Krill meal
`
`Figure 1. Extraction curves of krill oils with supercritical carbon
`dioxide at 250 kg/cm2 and 80 °C.
`
`CO2 flux
`
`(kg)
`
`.
`
`In this connection, Brogle (1982) reported that the solvent
`power of SC—002 for organic substances is highly de—
`pendent on its pressure and temperature; at low pressures,
`around 100 kg/cmz, solvent power drops with rising tem—
`peratures, and at pressures higher than approximately 150
`kg/ cm2, its solvent power increases. For the krill samples,
`however, the amounts of extracted oils were almost con—
`stant regardless of pressures and temperatures examined.
`That is, even under the lowest temperature/pressure
`combination (250 kg/cm2 and 40 °C), nearly all oils ex—
`tractable With SC-C02 were recovered. Further, yields of
`krill meal oil were one--third of those of freeze—dried krill
`oil. The lower yields from meal oil are probably attrib—
`utable to the fact that the oil of the krill meal was in part
`. deteriorated by [oxidatiOn or polymerization to such an
`extent that only limited extraction occurred with SC-CO2.
`Judging from this result, we think that SC-002 extraction
`is suitable method to obtain undenatured oils from meals
`of marine origin.
`To determine the composition of the extracted oils, We
`partitioned them by chromatography on a silica gel column
`using a mobile phase of chloroform and methanol. Ap-
`proximately 100% of the oils from both krill samples was
`recovered in the fraction eluted with chloroform, proving
`that the oils extracted With SCéCOZ were composed ex.-
`' clusively of nonpolar lipids with practically no polar lipids.
`Figure 2 shows TLC patterns of the oils extracted with
`80-C02 and the residual lipids. By co--TLC with standard
`reagents, the main component of the extracted oils was
`found to be triglycerides (spot 3) and the minor compo-
`nents were identified as hydrocarbon (1), cholesteryl ester
`(2), free fatty acids (4), diglycerides (5), cholesterol (7),
`monoglycerides (8), and carotenoids (6 and 9), as illustrated
`in chromatogram I.
`In addition, a small amount of a
`nonpolar lipid (spot 10) was found to be present1n the oil
`from the krill meal, but it remained unidentified The free
`fatty acid content of the oil from the krill meal was lower
`than that of the freeze—dried krill. Because of their rapid
`deterioration, some 0f free fatty acidsIn the meal should
`have been denatured during manufacture and storageof
`the meal.
`
`As shown in chromatogram II, trace amounts of some
`nonpolar lipids'(spots 3—9) were observed, but almost all
`the residual lipids (spot 11) were not affected when de-
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2002 Page 2
`
`
`
`
`amt, g/ 100 g sample
`rec,”
`extr
`resid
`total
`extractn
`
` sample condn" oil lipidb lipidb %
`
`
`
`
`freeze-dried
`250/ 40
`11.2
`7.6
`95
`krill
`250/60
`11.7‘
`7.9
`98
`250/80
`11.5
`8.1
`99
`250/ 40
`4.5
`8.1
`84
`250/60
`4.1
`9.0
`81
`250/80
`4.0
`8.4
`77
`400/40
`4.0
`9.0
`80
`
`krill meal
`
`19.7
`
`16.2
`
`”Pressure, kg/ cmz/temperature, °C. bMeasured by the Bligh—
`Dyer method. cRecovery = [extr oil + resid lipid] /total lipid X
`100.
`V
`
`After saponification and then esterification with boron
`trifluoride—methanol complex, the fatty acid composition
`of the oils was determined by GLC With a Shimadzu GC-
`5A gas chromatograph using a glass column (2 m X 3 mm)
`packed with 10% DEGS on Celite 545 (80—100 mesh) at
`a temperature of 200 °C, with nitrogen carrier gas at a flow
`rate of 25 mL/min. The temperature of the detector and
`injection port was 250 °C.
`The composition of carotenoids in the SC-Cog-extracted
`oils and in the residual lipids was analyzed by the method
`reported by Yamaguchi et a1. (1983).
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`Table I shows the proximate compositions of the krill
`samples. Total recoveries of components 0f the freeze-
`dried krill and the krill meal were rather low, because of
`the application of the Soxhlet method with diethyl ether
`for the extraction of lipid. The lipid of krill which contains.
`high proportions of polyunsaturated fatty acids and
`phospholipids (Mori and Hikichi, 1976), deteriorates rap—
`idly and diethyl ether insoluble lipid increases when krill
`is dehydrated or treated at high temperatures.
`In this
`connection, the lipid content of the krill meal was found
`to be 16. 2% when measured by the method of Bligh and
`Dyer (1959) with chloroform—methanol. Furthermore, the
`low recoveries in the freeze-dried krill and the krill meal
`may be also accounted for by chitin, contents of Which
`should be higher than thatin the frozen krill. _
`Figure 1 presents the SC-COZ extraction curves with
`time of oils from the freeze-dried krill and krill meal With
`SC--C02 at 250 kg/ cm2and 80 °C. For freeze-dried krill,
`extraction of oil practically terminated1n 3—4 h and after
`the use of 2—3. kg of C02 at a flow rate of about 0.6 kg/ h
`Extraction of the krill meal oil, hoWever, ceased after 2—3
`h and the use of 1—2 kg of C02. Reproducibility in the
`Experiments was very high.
`Table II shows the yields of oils extracted with SC—CO2
`under different conditions. In every sample the eXt'racted
`Oil was fluid and bright red from carotenoids. When the
`temperature was increased from 40 to 60 and 80 °C at a
`fixed pressure of 250 kg/ cm and when the pressure was
`Increased from 250 to 400 kg/cm2 at a fixed temperature
`0f 40 °C, yields of extracted oils remained almost constant.
`
`
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2002 Page 2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Yamaguchi et aL
`
`Table IV. Content and Composition of Carotenoids in Oils
`Extracted from Freeze-Dried Krill with Supercritical.
`Carbon Dioxide '
`
`
`temp of extractn,“ °C
`
`40
`60
`.
`carotenoid
`80
`
`total content, mg/ 100 g oil
`composition, %
`.
`astaxanthin diester
`astaxanthin monoester
`astaxanthin
`unidentified
`
`~
`
`43.5—50.4
`.
`48—58
`33—44
`5—7
`0—2
`
`19.1—24.3
`.
`
`78—83
`13—15
`3—4
`1
`
`7.0—8.7
`b
`
`5
`b
`b
`
`“Pressure: 250 kg/cm2. bUnable to be determined due to de-
`composition.
`
`freeze-dried krill at a fixed pressure of 250 kg/cm2 and
`stepwise increase of temperatures.
`In previous papers
`' (Yamaguchi’et al., 1983; Miki et al., 1983), we reported that
`the carotenoids of the Antarctic krill consist almost ex-
`clusively of astaxanthin and its esters and that their sta-
`bilities against heat and organic solvents are in the order
`of astaxanthin diester, astaxanthin monoester, and. asta—
`xanthin. It is evident that the astaxanthin tends to be
`, decomposed according to their instabilities during ex-
`traction with SC-COZ. Although Zosel (1978) pointed out
`that SC-C02 is suitable for the isolation of thermally labile ‘
`substances because of its low critical temperature, the
`above finding indicates that some compounds like asta-
`xanthin could be unstable under high pressures of SOS-
`CO2 at a temperature, for example 80 °C, that never in-
`duces the decomposition of astaxanthin under atmospheric
`pressure (Miki et al., 1983). Attention should be paid to
`this fact in the extraction of natural products with 80—002.
`In spite of such a disadvantage, we proved that SC-C02
`. is effective in obtaining nonpolar lipids from Antarctic krill
`by a simple, one-step extraction that excludes the phos-
`pholipids that have hampered the utilization of krill oils.
`In this connection, several workers (Stahl et al., 1980;
`Friedrich and List, 1982) have reported the removal of
`polar lipids from seed oils with SC-COZ, but the reason why
`polar lipids can be removed with 80—002 has not yet been
`elucidated.
`As shown in Table III, the oils extracted from krill
`samples with SC—002 contained fairly high proportions of
`.eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), which is known as a medi-
`cally useful substance (Needleman et al., 1979). Recently,
`Krukonis (1984) reported that, by using SC—C02 for the
`fractionation of fish oils, EPA could be concentrated to
`15% from, 8%. Used in this manner, SC-C02 extraction
`will produce useful substances from aquatic organisms.
`Abbreviations Used: SC-COZ, supercritical carbon
`dioxide; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid.
`ACKNOWLEDGMENT
`
`We are indebted to Dr. Y. Miyake, Director of the
`Central Research Institute of Iwatani & Co., Ltd., and Dr-
`T. Fujita, DirectOr of the Central Research Laboratory 0f
`Nippon Suisan Kaisha, Ltd., for their valuable advice;
`Thanks are also due to N. Ando and K. Kajiyama, Iwatal?1
`& Co., Ltd., for their help in SC-002 extraction expen—
`ments. We also thank Professor George J. Flick, De-
`partment of Food Science and Technology, Virginia P0-
`1ytechnic Institute and State University, for his review Of
`this paper.
`Registry No. EPA, 1553-41—9; COZ, 124-38-9; astaxanthin:
`472—61—7.
`
`LITERATURE CITED
`
`Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc. Official Method5
`of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists:
`14th ed.; AOAC: Washington, DC, 1984.
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2002 Page 3 ,
`
`906
`
`J. Agric. Food Chem, Vol. 34, No. 5, 1986 ‘
`A
`B
`A
`B
`
`A
`
`B
`
`
`
`II‘
`
`III
`
` I
`
`Figure 2. Thin-layer chromatograms of krill oils extracted with
`‘supercritical carbon dioxide (1) and the residual lipids (II and III):
`A, freeze-dried krill; B, krill meal. Stationary phase: silica gel
`60F254 in chromatograms I—III. Mobile phase: petroleum eth—
`er—diethyl ether—acetic acid (90:10:1) in chromatograms I and II;
`chloroform—methanol—Water (65:25:4)
`in chromatogram III.
`Identification: 50% H2804 in chromatograrns I and II; Dragen—
`dorff reagent in chromatogram III.

`.
`
`'Table III. Fatty Acid Composition of Oils Extracted from
`Krill Samples with Supercritical Carbon Dioxide“
`freeze-
`freeze-
`dried
`'
`dried
`
`fatty acid
`krill
`krill meal
`fatty acid
`krill
`krill meal
`12:0
`0.25
`0.28
`18:4
`1.98
`3.21
`14:0
`17.42
`19.08
`20:1
`1.82
`1.86
`15:0
`0.28
`0.21
`20:3
`0.15
`0.09
`16:0 '
`22.05
`18.78
`20:4w6 +
`1.08
`0.55
`16:1
`11.78
`16.30
`22:1
`17:1
`1.09
`1.70
`20:4w3
`18:0
`1.47
`1.33
`20:5
`18:1
`21.37
`22.40
`22:5
`18:2
`2.24
`3.56
`2226
`18:3
`0.30
`0.26
`24:1
`unidenti-
`fied
`
`0.32
`. 11.36
`0.20
`4.44
`0.32
`0.08
`
`0.30
`6.62
`0.18
`2.71
`0.42
`0.16
`
`“Conditions of extraction: 250 kg/cmz, 60 °C.
`
`eloped with petroleum ether—diethyl ether—acetic acid
`(90:10:1), indicating that the residual lipids were composed
`almost exclusively of polar lipids together with denatured
`and polymerized lipids. Furthermore, as shown in chro-
`matogram III, when the residual lipids were developed
`using chloroform—methanol—water (65:25z4) and visualized
`with Dragendorff reagent, at least three orange-red spots
`(12—14) of phospholipids were detected. These results
`confirmed that the SC—002 extraction of krill samples
`yielded only nonpolar undenatured oils, as mentioned
`above.
`.
`Table III shows the fatty acid compositions of the oils
`extracted with SC-COZ at a pressure of 250 kg/ cm2 and
`a temperature of 60 °C. Essentially no differences were
`noticed in the fatty acid compositions of the oils extracted
`under other conditions. Whereas the main fatty acids were
`14:0, 16:0, 16:1, 18:1, and 20:5 in oils of both freeze—dried
`krill and krill meal, significant differences were found
`between krill meal and freeze-dried krill oils in the 16:1,
`20:5, and 22:6 acids.
`Table IV shows the content and composition of caro—
`tenoids in the oils extracted with SC-COZ from. the
`
`» v
`
`
`
`
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2002 Page 3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`J. Agric. Food Chem. 1986,, 34, 907—910
`
`‘
`
`907
`
`Bligh, E. G.; Dyer, W. J. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 1959, 37, 911.
`Brannolte, H. D.; Mangold, H. K; Stahl, E. Chem. Phys. Lipids
`1983, 33, 297.
`Brogle, H. Chem. Ind. 1982, 19, 385.
`Friedrich, J. P.; List, G. R. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1982, 30, 192.
`Hannay, J. B.; Hogarth, J. Proc. R. Soc..Lond0n 1879, 29, 324.
`Hubert, P.; Vitzthum, O. G. Angew. Chem, Int. Ed. Engl. 1978,
`17, 710.
`Kaufmann, W.; Biernoth, G.; Frade, E.; Merk, W.; Precht, D.;
`Timmen, H. 'Milchwissenschaft 1982, 37, 92.
`Krukonis, V. JAOCS 1984, 61, 698.
`Miki, W.; Toriu, N.; Kondo, Y.; Murakami, M.; Yamaguchi, K.;
`Konosu, S.; Satake, M.; Fujita, T. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Fish. 1983,
`49, 1417.
`Mori, M.; Hikichi, S. Rep. Cent. Res. Lab. Nippon Suisan Co.
`1976, No. 11,12.
`
`Needleman, P.; Raz, A.; Mikes, S. M.; Ferrendelli, J. A.; Sprecher,
`H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1979, 76, 944.
`Paul, P. F.; Wise, W. S. The Principles of Gas Extraction;,Mills
`and Boon, Ltd.: London, England, 1971.
`Stahl, E.; S'chutz, E.; Manglod, H. K. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1980,
`28, 1153.
`Wilke, G. Angew. Chem, Int. Ed. Engl. 1978, 17, 701.
`Yamaguchi, K.; Miki, W.; Toriu, N.; Kondo, Y.; Murakami, M.;
`Konosu, S.; Satake, M.; Fujita, T. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish.
`1983, 49, 1411.
`.
`Zosel, K. Ger. Pat. 2005 243, 1974.
`Zosel, K. Angew. Chem, Int. Ed. Engl. 1978, 17, 701.
`
`Received for review December 9, 1985. Revised manuscript re-
`ceived April 2, 1986. Accepted April 22, 1986.
`
`Isolation of Estrogens in Bovine Plasma and Tissue Extracts Using -
`Alumina and Ion-Exchange Microcolumns
`‘
`
`
`
`Marjorie B. Medina* and Daniel P. Schwartz
`
`Estrogens (estradiol, estrone) in picogram quantities can be isolated quantitatively from bovine plasma
`and tissue extracts by a simple procedure. Bovine plasma (0.1—1.0 mL) was extracted with either acetone
`or ether while tissues (1 g) were extracted with acetone. Extracts were passed through two disposable
`plastic tubes vertically arranged in tandem. The top column (5-mL pipet tip) contained 1-1.5 g of dry
`basic alumina and removed interfering substances. The bottom column (transfer pipet) contained 0.3—1.0
`g of wet anion-exchange resin in the phosphate form and trapped the estrogens through their phenolic
`hydroxyl group. The estrogens were then eluted with acetic acid in acetone following a thorough washing
`of the columns. Recoveries greater than 95% were obtained when extracts of bovine plasma and tissue
`extracts of liver, kidney, and heart were spiked’with either tritiated 176-estradiol or estrone. This
`and accuracy over traditional methods employed
`technique offers the advantages of simplicity, rapidity,
`routinely in the purification of estrogens.
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Partial purification of estrogens extracted from animal
`tissues and fluids is necessary prior to most methods of
`quantitation. The methods currently employed in routine
`analysis of estrogens such as paper chromatography (Shutt,
`1969), Sephadex LH—20 (Sjovall and Nystrom, 1968;
`Murphy, 1970; Mikhail et al., 1970; Murphy and Diez
`D’Aux, 1975), and Celite column cleanup (Korenman'et
`al., 1969; Abraham et al., 1970) are tedious with reported
`recoveries of only 65—85%. Aqueous solutions of estrogens
`had also been purified by ion exchange (Jarvenpaa et al.,
`1979) with reported recoveries of 50—90%. Covey and
`co—workers'(1984) also used an anion-exchange resin for
`purification of diethylstilbestrol and dienestrol.
`This paper describes a relatively simple and rapid
`technique that can quantitatively isolate the estrogens
`(estradiol, estrone) from acetone extracts of bovine blood
`plasma and tissues " for subsequent chromatographic
`analysis. This study is a preliminary report on the de-
`velopment of screening methods to detect and measure
`residues of estrogens in the blood and edible tissues of
`food—producing animals given growth-promoting hormones ‘
`
`
`Table I. Column Conditions for Isolation of [3H]Estradiol
`Added to Bovine Plasma and Tissue Extracts Using the
`Alumina Ion-Exchange Columns
`extr appl
`resin
`to col,
`suspensn,
`basic alumina,
`mL sample mL g
`
`
`
`
`
`acetone extractn
`0.1
`0.5
`1.0
`1.0
`ether extractn
`1.0
`
`A. Bovine Plasma (mL)
`
`2
`4
`8
`8c
`
`4
`
`1.0 (3)“
`1.0 (3)
`1.5 (5)
`1.5 (5)
`
`1.0 (3)
`
`,
`
`1.0 (2)5
`2.0 (3)
`3.0 (4)
`- 3.0 (4)
`'
`1.0 (2)
`
`-
`
`B. Bovine Tissues (1 g/ 8 mL of Acetone)
`2.0 (3)
`2
`1.0 (3)
`liver
`2.0 (3)
`2
`1.0 (3)
`muscle
`2.0 (3)
`2
`1.0 (3)
`heart
`2.0 (3)
`2
`1.0 (3)
`kidney .
`“Total volume 95% acetone (mL) to wash alumina column.
`bTotal volume 10% HOAc in acetone (mL) to elute [3H]estradiol.
`° Plasma/ acetone mixture added directly to column with glass wool
`on top of alumina bed.
`
`Eastern Regional Research Center, Agricultural Re—'
`search Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Phila—
`delphia, Pennsylvania 19118.
`
`This article not subject to U.S. Copyright. Published 1986 by the American CheA'LQEdRQEXHlBlTZOOZ Pa e 4
`
`such as 176-estradiol and to ascertain their absence such
`that safe and wholesome food can be delivered to con-
`sumers.
`
`AKER EXHIBIT 2002 Page 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket