throbber
November 20, 2001
`
`HEALTH SCIENCES
`LIBRARIES
`
`
`
`December 7-11. 2001
`
`Orlando. Florida
`
`'R20 3-.
`
`A
`
`Celgene Ex. 2010, Page 1
`
`VOLUME 98
`
`NUMBER 11
`
`NOVEMBER 16, 2001
`
`PART 1 OF 2 PARTS
`
`Amnrrcan Society of
`
`Hematology
`
`Forty-thud annual
`
`meeting program
`and abstracts
`
`IPR2018-01714
`Celgene Ex. 2010, Page 1
`
`

`

`
`
`PROGRAM OF THE 43RD ANNUAL MEETING OF
`
`THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY
`
`December 7-11, 2001
`
`Orlando, Florida
`
`Copyright© 200 l , The American Society of Hematology, Washington, DC.
`
`Printed in the USA
`
`|PR2018—0171
`
`Celgene Ex. 2010, Page 2
`
`IPR2018-01714
`Celgene Ex. 2010, Page 2
`
`

`

`MYELOMA THERAPIES
`
`CM 3224
`
`_.
`
`\
`
`-
`
`‘
`
`ptotlc Signaling induced by Immunomodulatory Thalidomide
`oga (lmlds) in Human Multiple Myeloma Cells: Therapeutic
`- ~ tions. Nicholas Mitsiades‘,‘ Constantine S. Mitsiades‘,‘ Vassililti
`i‘f Masaharu Akiyama’,‘ Yu-Tzu Tai’,‘ Boris K. Lin‘,‘ Toshiaki
`It‘l Lawrence Catlcy‘,‘ Tel.“ Hideshima‘.‘ Dmmdfl Chauhan‘,‘
`P. Treon',‘ Kenneth C. Anderson.‘ ’Department of Adult Oncology.
`r Farber Cancer Institute. Boston. MA; "Massachusetts Eve and Ear
`nnarv. 305,0". MA.
`'
`IIi'Inlidomide (Thai) achieves recpomeveninthesettingofrefiactory mulfip'emyelm
`I
`. Although increased mgiogenesis in MM bone mmw and [he anti—angio‘enic
`, ofTim] formed the empiric basis for its use in MM. Thai and its immunomodulatory
`7.
`(lMiDa) may also inhibit the production of cytokincs in the bone marrow and
`. NK mu anti-MM immunity. Oufpriof studs“ hm; a)” mnsmred a... lMiDl
`. wm, NJ) is mermaid m pom. aw. Thal in inhibiting the growth ofMM
`and directly induces apoptogis in the MMJS MM cell line, we uremia," investigated
`. the mm)“ or its pro-apoptotic activity, in mm“! the role (ll-W and the
`w
`'val transcription factor NF-kB. Using a colorimetric activity assay, we found that
`‘ "I | WWW-8' but notcaspase-9. activity in MM. lScella. Moreover. the caspase-
`- ific inhibitor lETD-FMK. but not the caspase 9 inhibitor LEHD—FMK. protected
`IS cells fiom lMiDI-indueed cell death. Cum-8 is a key mediator ofdeath receptor.
`apoptosis and can be inhibited by the anti-opoptotic proteins clAPZ and FLIP.
`found that lMiDI sensitized MM.|S cells to low concentrations of Fas-crosslinking Ab
`. 11. and downregulated elAP2 and FLIP, but not Bel-2. protein expression. The
`.'
`'ve activity of NF Kg a PM survival WM" factor that wwsulufl elAP2
`FLIP expression in various models. was also decreased upon treatment with [MD], as
`the expression of another NF-ltB larger gene, the adhesion molecule [CAM-l. lMiDl
`blocked the stimulatory effect orlrsulin-like Growth Factor(lGF)—l on NF-KB activity
`clAl’2 and FLIP protein levels. lmportantly. lMiDl potentiated the anti-MM activity
`2
`.
`. r
`and lheproteesome inhibitor P5341 (Millenniurn.Cambridge, MA). These
`- both delineate the mechanisms ofacllonoflMlDl against MM cellsIn vitroand form
`basis for clinical trials of these agents alone and coupled with conventional and other
`— thean to improve outcome in MM.
`
`,
`
`.
`
`I
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`i
`
`I
`
`‘
`
`in an additional 3 pta. Conclusion: This study shows that
`evaluable pts (63%) and <25"/.
`CC~5013 has anti-tumor activity and acceptable toxicity in pts with relapsed and refractory
`MM. and provides the framework forfilture phase II mm m MM.
`
`775a
`
`
`
`“mm“ 3226
`Results of Pill" I Study of CC-5013 for the Treatment of Multiple
`Myeloma
`(MM) Patients WI” 39"?” “t? High 09‘?
`Chemotherapy (HDCT) Maunzlo 281183", Guido Tneot, Jerome Zeldlsr'
`Paul Eddiemon’,‘ Fanba Sagbafifar‘,‘ Bart Barlogle.l ’Myeloma and
`Transplantation Research Center. University of Arkansas for Medical
`Sciences. Little Rock. AR, USA; ’Celgene, Warren, NJ. USA.
`Dewitt lhc “TI/v50 complete response rate and increased survival achieved by high
`dose chemotherapy, there is a clear need to further improve treatment outcome in MM. We
`report results from a single center, open label. escalating dose. phase l-study of the
`thalidomide derivative CC-5013. Four different daily dose levels (5/ 10/25/50 mg) were
`tested. All patients were treated for four weeks. In the absence of dose-limiting toxicity
`(DLT) or evidence of disease progression (PD), patients could be entered on an extension
`study. which allowed filrther dose escalations. The maximum dose allowed in this study
`was 50 mg/day. if at any level one of the first 3 patients experienced DLT. the cohort was
`expanded to 6 patients; if 2 patients experienced DTL in the same cohort. no further dose
`escalation was allowed. Fifteen pmients were enrolled; 6 were males. Median age was 62
`years (43-73); median In micmslobulin was 2-6 mil/I (1.4-6.4). medim CRP 0.24 mg/I (.09
`to 3.7). Ten had chromosome 13 abnormalities on cytogenetic analysis. All patients had
`chemorefractory disease having ”law after 8‘ least one HDCT (range l ‘0 3) With 3
`median of 10 prior cycles of chemotherapy (range 3 to 80). No responses were seen at the
`S and 10 mg level. However, 2 of the 3 patients, who started at 10 mg and were subsequently
`escalatedon the extension study to 25 and 50 mg, respectively, achieved a> 50% paraprotein
`response with a decrease in BM plasmacywsis of 50% in one patient. while the Other
`continued to show < 5% bone marrow plasma cells. Oncpatienlatthe 25 mg level had stable
`pmprotein and bone marrow plasrnacytosis for 5 months, while discontinuation of therapy
`W Wind in 2 [1311'an (one syncope; 00C PD) 51" patients started 3‘ 5° Ins/day: 3 IN
`still on study. one with stable, one with > 25% and one with> 50 % in both paraprotein level
`and bone marrow plasmacytosis; 2 patients experienced DLT (thromboembolism and
`profound thrombocytopenia) and one PD. Six patients continue on this study alter 2, 2. 4.
`5. 6 and 6 months, five at 50 myday and one at 25 mg/day dose. Five ofthere patients have
`experienced a > 50% drop in platelet count. The initial platelet count in these 5 patients was
`> 140,000/pl and their bone marrow biopsy eellularity > 30%. We conclude that 20% of
`these heavily pretreated MM patients showed a > 50% paraprotein reduction with a
`concomitant bone marrow reapome. Responses were only observed at the 25 and 50 mg
`dose. However. the
`thalidomide derivative appears to also cause significant
`myelosuppression even in patients with adequate platelet counts and bone marrow
`llularity before the start of treatment. it also has the potential to cause cardiovascular
`°°
`I
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`pmblems such as mm boll“ "Id synmpe‘ Neuromgw “mew Is "mum"
`Abstractil 3227
`
`\ new 3225
`.
`tn lmmunomodulflory
`» "I" 1 Study of 0"“ CC5013.
`( alidornide (Thai) Derivative, in Patients with Relapaed and
`.. raetory Multiple Myelorna
`(MM). P.G. Riehardson.‘ R.L.
`., 2
`;
`' T. Hideshima,‘ F. Davies.' R. LeBlanc.' L. Catley,‘ D. Dosis‘,I
`' A. Kellytll M. McKenney".I J. Mechlowicz‘.‘ A. Freeman’,‘ R.
`-
`-
`..
`. po‘,‘ R. RICh‘,‘ .l. Ryoo‘,‘ D. Chauhan,‘ N. Munshr,I E. Weller‘,‘
`Thomas‘.2 .1. Zeldis.2 K.C. Anderson.‘ ’Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.
`I ran. MA. USA: ‘Celgene Inc., Warren, NJ. USA.
`;
`Introduction: Thalidomide (tlnl)has a broad spectrum ofbiologic effects andsigrlifieant
`activity against multiple myelomn (MM). CC-5013,asmall molecule derivative of
`Single Subcutaneous Dose of an Osteo rote erin (0P6)
`A
`arlda rrrembcroflhcrrnrrlunomodrrlatory drugthrD)class. rs moreporenl than thal m
`Construct
`(AMCN-0007) Cause: a Profound and Sustained
`' KdIFCI-cfiORIIlC-mlaled mdlmmnf’dulalofxcmfls 3831“!“ human MM 061'
`Decrease of Bone Resorption Comparable to Standard Intravenous
`— andpatlent(pt)dcnved cells in vilra
`. Animal studles ofCC-5013 have shown anu-
`Biaphoaphonate in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. p. Greipp I T.
`activity and anti-angiogenic effects. with minimal toxicity. Moreover. this agent has
`2
`-
`-
`y
`-
`a
`~
`. 5
`_
`I r,
`amblrrarery profile in normal human volunteers. Methods: Aphaseistudyhasbeen
`Saw“: C'Pj X'IIISII‘S' A' “in? A1" Ma."°‘§°A’ is: F‘?";‘.i“fi; 1;"
`-
`-
`-~ ln ptswrthrefractoryorrelapsed MM tordentlfy themarumumtolerateddoseand
`erenson; lo '
`'
`arousseag.
`‘
`exaitllgnl.
`‘
`d ants I
`‘
`'
`mm the “My ofCC-5013 given on“), for up w 4 weeks a. 5 "IE/day (d). 10 mg/d,
`Holloway . C.R. Dunstan , PJ. Bekker . Mayo Cllnlc, Rochester;
`, nlg/d and 50 mg/d. swung"). objectives included ewiuflfion of response .0 c050”,
`.
`MN: ‘ICHU de Lille. Lille. France; ’Christie Hospital. Manchester. United
`_ well as phannncokinetics and identification of surrogate markers to aid in defining
`Kingdom; ‘Hershey Medical Center, Hershey. PA; ’CHU de Bicetre. Paris.
`. ..
`. isms of action. Pts tolerating dmg and without progression were permitted to
`France: “Hopital Saint-Louis. Paris. France; 7Cedars Sinai Med Ctr. Los
`-
`2 H
`.0" my beyond 28“ aspanofan extension PM for “D10 | year. “all“: 26
`Angeles, CA; 'Hopl'tal Hotel Dl'eu. Nantes. France: "MD Anderson Med Ctr:
`(lrledlarl age 57y, range 40-70y) have been enrolled; 16 had undergone prior autologous
`Houston, TX;
`inAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks. CA.
`In cell transplantationand lohadreoeivedpriorthal.withamedianof3priortegimens
`2-6). All us had "I
`MM and 18 were refractory to salvage th
`. 2 m were
`Bone desmrctlon causes srguficant morbidity In most patients Wlth multiple myeloma
`'
`(MM). Cytokinea released during bone destruction romote m lonta cell proliferation and
`‘ °"mfiymm 9yl9fzfigmfl° ‘° “P"3”“ W532"? “m"
`survival. ore is a potent inhibitorofosteoclnstic btfne demucfizn. A modernized, double-
`I
`'
`ren
`II" '8'
`e
`e
`rst ”WP"
`ptswere MI
`or 8 d 'I
`blind, double-dummy. active-controlled, single-dose. dose escalation study is being
`d WIIII‘IIII any 6°“ III'IIIIIIIB ”IIICI‘Y (DLT). The second cohort “f3 P“ commenced
`conducted to determine the safety and effect on bone resorption of AMGN-0007 in MM
`'
`8.! I0 ngd In I PI‘ DLT w.mm°"d WIIII M (G) 2 fever as “II as 03
`patients with radiological confirmed lytic bone lesions. Patients were randomized (3:1
`" '
`a “lW“ “mm“! "‘ ””0"" “2"“ “My ”9“" " 28- ,2?“ ‘_°"i“‘°“
`ratio) to receive a single dose ofeither AMGN-DOO’T sc or pamidronate (PAM; 90 mg 1V)
`'“d 3 ““9“ P“ “m m“ 2“ '0 "‘8" “m" "0 “mm“ ‘°.’“F"Y “"“l'” “‘e
`and were followed for 57 days. Medications or other diseases affecting bone metabolism
`’ 2“- '" “‘° “W °°h°" ”13 P" “ 25mg" “”3 "'3 W" ”W “"‘h'n "'e “‘3‘ 23d
`and chemotherapy within 28 days of dosing were exclusion criteria. Biological activity of
`.6'3 "'d 204 wwfl "gym: “cw during III: mumw
`AMGN-0007 was assessed by mmment of the surrogate marker of bone resorption.
`-
`4. "I P”
`"38 m ,m Y~ "
`“In“ W a! 50m!“-
`. P,"
`urinary N-telopeptidc of collagen (NTX). Preliminary data indicate that sc AMGN—0007
`"'
`.III
`I III Without DLT III III: III? 28d’ but subsequent G3 myelosuppteaston III
`caused a rapid, sllstained dose-dependent decrease in NTX/creatinine levels (nmoi Bone
`extension PM” prompted do“ reduction ”d GCSF W' T° date, a M“ 8 pts
`Collagen Equivalents/ml creatinine). No patients dropped out due to adverse events.
`. been treated at SOmyd to better define toxrctty and outcome. No DLT bu been
`Two patients in the 1.0 mg/ltg AMGN-0007 81'9“? had albuninodjwted serum calcium
`-
`. tered within the first 28d, and no significant somnolence. constipation or neuropathy
`levels of 7.4 and 7.5 mg/dL at day 8. but there were no clinical sequelae.
`In conclusion, a
`been seen in any cohort. Median duration oftherapy is currently 2 months [range 1 week
`single SC dose of AMGN-0007 suppressed bone resorption as indicated by a rapid.
`_ months] and 16 pts continue on treatment. Maximal paraprotein reductions seen during
`sustained. and profound decrease of urinary NTX/creatinine in MM patients. Changes were
`..
`in pts who have received 2 28d of treatment are summarized below:
`~
`“'2’ 2““
`‘2’“
`2.5.2.5...
`2"“ W2" mow"MW ”W'mk'“
`9",,
`3
`.
`2
`l
`.
`SM,
`i
`i
`i
`I
`f
`AMGN-ooln
`a
`2
`3
`3
`.
`SC (ms/kw
`2:2
`m 12:7:
`3.0 “PM
`PAM 90 II:
`[V (n-ol
`
`‘
`I
`
`‘
`
`,
`
`.
`'-
`E.
`-
`
`2
`
`Best responses in Paraprotein with a
`
`lion of 2 25% have
`
`.
`
`seen in 12 of 19
`
`linen-re NTX; Mean no)
`Dry 0
`222222
`2728 :l '17;
`27.8 (I71)
`2428 (NJ)
`
`Percent Change nan Baseline N'rx; Mean (SE)
`Day 1
`Day a
`Day 29
`2.22::
`68:8 16:6:
`.347 (16.9)
`.324 (9.7)
`
`:56:‘ lilti)’
`46.4 (14.7)
`43.9 (3.4)
`
`57:9 Elli)
`.325 (12.6)
`66.9 (5.7)
`
`lPR2018—O1714
`
`Celgene Ex. 2010, Page 3
`
`IPR2018-01714
`Celgene Ex. 2010, Page 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket