throbber
Vol. 310 No. 21
`
`TREATMENT OF ADVANCED MULTIPLE MYELOMA-BARLOGIE ET AL.
`
`1353
`
`EFFECTIVE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED MULTIPLE MYELOMA REFRACTORY TO
`ALKYLA TING AGENTS
`
`BART BARLOGIE, M.D., LON SMITH, M.D., AND RAYMOND ALEXANIAN, M.D.
`
`Abstract Twenty-nine patients with advanced refractory
`multlple myeloma were treated with Intermittent high-dose
`dexamethasone In combination with four-day Infusions of
`vlncrlstlne and doxorubicin. Rapid and marked tumor·
`mass reduction (> 75 per cent) was noted in 14 of 20
`patients whose disease was resistant to alkylating agents
`
`and in 3 of 9 patients with additional resistance to doxoru·
`blcin - a result far superior to those in previous trials with
`similar patients. In responsive patients, remissions were
`of excellent quality, and survival was significantly longer
`than in unresponsive patients. (N Engl J Med 1984;
`310:1353·6.)
`
`T HE prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma
`
`that is refractory to combinations of alkylating
`agents and prednisone has been poor because few ef·
`fective salvage treatments are available. 1"3 In a recent
`study, a combination ofvincristine, doxorubicin, and
`pulsed prednisone induced substantial reductions in
`tumor mass in about half the patients with advanced
`refractory disease. 4 More frequent courses of predni(cid:173)
`sone alone were also effective in patients who had been
`resistant to previous drug combinations that had in·
`eluded monthly prednisone, suggesting a dose-de(cid:173)
`pendent antitumor effect from corticosteroids. These
`observations suggested that the results might be im·
`proved with even higher doses of corticosteroids com·
`bined with a continuous infusion ofvinca alkaloid and
`doxorubicin to affect more slowly proliferating plasma
`cells. This report summarizes our experience with
`high doses ofdexamethasone in conjunction with four·
`day infusions of vincristine and doxorubicin. Seventy
`per cent of patients with advanced myeloma that was
`refractory to alkylating agents had marked reductions
`in tumor mass -
`a result superior to any previously
`achieved in our patients with resistant myeloma.
`
`METHODS
`
`Between .January and October 1983, 29 patients with advanct·d
`refractory multiple myeloma were treated with a mmbination of
`vincristinc, doxorubicin (adriamycin), and dexamethasoiw (\'AD).
`Their clinical features wcrt' similar to thost• dcsnibt'd in pre\'ious
`large groups of patients with resistant myeloma. 1•·1 The median agt•
`was 61 years, and 72 per cent of the patients had an intermediate or
`high tumor-mass stage. Twel\'e patients had lgG myt•loma and 11
`had lgA myt•loma; 6 patients st•creh·d Hmn• .Jont•s prntt•in only.
`Patients with nonscaetory mydoma wt•rt· indigiblt· for tht• study
`because there was no mydoma-prott•in marker from which to C\'alu(cid:173)
`ate a response. Previously unresponsivt· patients with a low and
`stable tumor mass were ineligible because they were asymptomatit·
`and had a good prognosis.
`The V AD regimen consisted of four-day continuous infusions of
`vincristine (0.4 mg per day) and doxorubicin (9 mg per square
`meter of body-surface area per day), given through an indwelling
`cathett'r with use ofTravenol pumps; in addition, patients received
`dexamethasone in a dose of 40 mg each morning for four days,
`beginning on Days I, 9, and 17 of each cycle. Treatment was usually
`initiated and continued in the outpatient clinic unless complications
`developed. Twenty patients were resistant to alkylating agent(cid:173)
`prednisone combinations (VAD I), and the other nine patients
`were also resistant to prior doxorubicin combinations (e.g., month·
`
`From the Department of Hematology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson
`Hospital and Tumor Institute. Address reprint requests to Dr. Barlogie at M. D.
`Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute, 6723 Bertner Ave .. Box SS, Houston.
`TX 77030.
`Supported by grants (CA 28771 and CA 16672) from the National Cancer
`Institute, National Institutes of Health.
`
`ly vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin [adriamycin], and
`prednisone) (VAD II). In all patients, tumor resistance was present
`despite myelosuppressive doses of chemotherapy. No patient had
`been included in previous studies concerning the utility of therapy
`with vincristine, doxorubicin, and pulsed prednisone therapy. 4
`There were 14 patients who had never responded to a median of 13
`months of prior therapy (VAD I, seven patients; VAD II, seven
`patients). A second group of 15 patients had responded to prior
`treatment and had relapsed after a median duration of 36 months
`despite continued chemotherapy (VAD I, 13 patients; VAD II, 2
`patients). Thus, all patients had obvious resistance to a long course
`ofmyelosuppressive chemotherapy, and tumor progression was evi(cid:173)
`dent in most patients.
`All patients received prophylactic antacid treatment with cimeti·
`dine and antibiotic prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethox(cid:173)
`azole. Special attention was given to the early detection of infection;
`all patients were asked to record evening temperatures and to seek
`medical evaluation promptly if temperatures exceeded 38°C.
`All trials included weekly measurements of blood counts and
`monthly assessment of laboratory chemistry and electrophoretic
`data. Marrow aspirations were performed to assess the RNA con·
`tent of plasma cells by flow cytometry and serial changes in the
`degree of plasma-cell infiltration. 5 A response was defined as a re(cid:173)
`duction in tumor mass exceeding 75 per cent, with disappearance of
`Bence Jones protein t'Xcretion.'; Changes in tumor mass from the
`start oftreatmt'nt were calculated from changes in myt'loma-protein
`production; this assessment considt•red the serum mydoma-protein
`concentration, the change in lgG cataholic rate with falling lt•\•els,
`tht• estimated plasma volume, and tht' background of normal gam·
`ma globulin. 1:our patients died during tht• first two months of
`tlwrapy, and their tn·aunents were mnsidt•rt>d failures.
`VAD clwmotherapy was repeatt•d until a maximum reduction in
`myeloma protein had ot·curred. Responsi\'e patit'nts in whom serum
`myeloma prott•in had disappt•arcd or le\'els had stabilized n·ceiwd
`four additional courses ofVAD bt'fore u·1·atment was stopped. Sur(cid:173)
`\'ival was t•akulatt'd b\' life-table anal\'sis from the onst•t of \'AD
`tn·atmt'nt until dt>ath. ·
`.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Twenty-nine consecutive patients with resistant
`myeloma received the V AD regimen. One group of20
`patients who were resistant to melphalan-prednisone
`included 7 patients who had received doxorubicin at
`least six months earlier (V AD I). Reductions in tumor
`mass exceeding 75 per cent were observed in 14 pa·
`tients in this group (70 per cent) (Table I); this re(cid:173)
`sponse rate was significantly higher than the 23 per
`cent frequency of 75 per cent tumor reduction ob(cid:173)
`served in comparable previous patients treated with
`vincristine, doxorubicin (adriamycin), and pulsed
`prednisone (V AP) (P<0.05). 4 The tumor reduction
`occurred rapidly; the median tumor-halving time
`among responders ranged from 0.3 to 1.6 months (me(cid:173)
`a period similar to the l.l-month period
`dian, 0.9) -
`observed in responders to VAP. 4 Among the 23 pa·
`tients with a serum monoclonal component, disap-
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org by Keely Southwick on November 21, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` From the NEJM Archive. Copyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`ALVOGEN, Exh. 1032, p. 0001
`
`

`

`1354
`
`THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
`
`May 24, 1984
`
`Table 1. Response to VAD Therapy According to Effects of Earlier
`Treatment.
`
`RESPONDING PATIENTS •
`
`PREVIOUSLY
`UNRESPONSIVE
`
`PREVIOUSLY
`RELAPSING
`
`TOTAL
`
`3 of 7
`
`JI of 13
`
`14 of 20 (70%)
`
`3 of 7
`
`0 of 2
`
`3 of 9 (33%)
`
`PATIENT GROUP
`
`Resistant to
`melphalan (V AD I)
`
`Resistant to melphalan
`and doxorubicin
`(VAD II)
`
`Total
`
`6 of 14
`
`JI of IS
`
`17 of 29 (59%)
`
`"'A rei.ponfie was defined as a >75 per cent reduction in tumor ma"s. Among lhc re!i.pondin~
`patient•, tumor halving occurred in a median of 0.9 month (range, 0.3 to 1.6).
`
`pearance of the abnormal globulin from the electro(cid:173)
`phoretic strip occurred in two patients, as compared
`with none of the patients treated with VAP. Among
`six patients with Bence Jones protein only, light-chain
`excretion disappeared in two, as compared with none
`of eight similar patients treated with VAP. 4 In the
`second group, containing nine patients who had been
`resistant to both melphalan and doxorubicin combi(cid:173)
`nations (V AD 11), only three patients responded
`(Table 1); such patients had not been eligible for the
`earlier V AP program. Among the patients who had
`initially responded to previous treatment and then re(cid:173)
`lapsed, 73 per cent responded to VAD, as compared
`with 43 per cent of those who had been unresponsive
`to prior therapy (P = 0.16). All six patients in this
`latter group were clearly resistant in that they had
`either progressive disease (three patients) or a stable
`tumor mass despite at least six months of prior ther(cid:173)
`apy (three patients). As in previous studies, a high
`RNA index (ratio of mean RNA content of marrow
`plasma cells vs. that of normal lymphocytes5) was as(cid:173)
`sociated with a high response rate. Thus, there was a
`progressive increase in response rate, from 0 per cent
`in patients with a low RNA index (<4) to 50 per cent
`in those with intermediate values (4 to 6) and 87 per
`cent in those with a high RNA index (>6) (P<0.01)
`(Fig. 1).
`
`Cllnlcal Courae
`All 17 responding patients also had marked clinical
`benefit, with reduced pain and improved perform(cid:173)
`ance. In 15 of the 29 patients, the pretreatment hemo(cid:173)
`globin concentration was <IO g per deciliter. In six of
`nine anemic responders the hemoglobin rose by at
`least 2.5 g per deciliter, to more than 11.5 g per decili(cid:173)
`ter during remission, with chronic renal failure ac(cid:173)
`counting for the exceptions. None of the six anemic
`nonresponders had any rise in hemoglobin level.
`Myeloma-protein reduction was accompanied by a
`similarly rapid and marked clearing of bone-marrow
`plasmacytosis, from a pretreatment median of 38 per
`cent to a median of 1 per cent within one month (Fig.
`2). The survival of responding patients was signifi(cid:173)
`cantly longer than that of patients in whom treatment
`failed (P = 0.002); the projected survival time for re(cid:173)
`sponders exceeds one year (Fig. 3). Although the me-
`
`dian survival time of all patients was short, the median
`relapse-free survival time has not been reached. There
`were two patients who had relapsed four and six
`months, respectively, after completion of VAD ther(cid:173)
`apy, who again had a prompt >75 per cent reduction
`in tumor mass upon reinitiation of V AD.
`VAD chemotherapy induced mild and reversible
`depressions of blood counts. During the first two
`courses, the median nadir of granulocytes was 1700
`per microliter (range, 250 to 4100), and that of plate(cid:173)
`lets was 138,000 per microliter (range, l l ,000 to
`233,000). As in previous studies with pulsed predni(cid:173)
`sone, infection represented the most important com(cid:173)
`plication. Eleven patients had episodes of fever, re(cid:173)
`quiring hospitalization in nine, and an infectious
`agent was identified in eight patients. There were four
`cases of pneumonia, two episodes of gram-positive
`bacteremia (probably related to the indwelling cath(cid:173)
`eter), and two cases of gram-negative sepsis. Four
`patients had documented viral infections, including
`herpetic esophagitis (two patients), herpes zoster in(cid:173)
`fection (one patient), and cytomegalovirus infection
`with hepatitis (one patient). The herpetic infections
`responded promptly to treatment with acyclovir and
`did not require interruption ofVAD therapy. Perhaps
`because of the regular use of cimetidine, gastrointesti(cid:173)
`nal side effects were minimal. A paralytic ileus devel(cid:173)
`oped in one patient but did not recur after omission of
`vincristine from the V AD regimen. Severe depression
`developed in another patient but was managed suc(cid:173)
`cessfully with antidepressants, so that dexamethasone
`treatment could be continued.
`
`DISCUSSION
`The V AD regimen was developed as a result of
`our previous findings that the addition of frequent
`
`Responaa
`
`No
`Responaa
`
`Responaa
`Rate
`
`14
`
`12
`
`10
`
`•
`•
`·>
`j 8
`i 6 UI
`I
`
`~
`
`4
`
`2
`
`0
`
`0
`
`B
`0
`8
`0
`
`000
`
`87%
`
`}
`
`50%
`
`O'lli
`
`0
`Figure 1. Relation between the RNA Index of Plasma Cells
`and the Response to VAD In 27 Patients.
`See text for definition of RNA Index.
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org by Keely Southwick on November 21, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` From the NEJM Archive. Copyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`ALVOGEN, Exh. 1032, p. 0002
`
`

`

`Vol. 310 No. 21
`
`TREATMENT OF ADVANCED l\WLTIPLE l\1YEL0l\1A- BARLOGIE ET AL.
`
`1355
`
`60
`
`(/)
`
`(/)
`
`•
`•
`~
`0
`~
`•
`.!!! 40 •
`a..
`•
`'E
`•
`•
`Cl>
`u ...
`Cl> a..
`•
`•
`
`20
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`•
`•
`
`•
`
`0
`
`0
`
`•
`•
`
`0
`
`Pre Rx
`
`1 Month
`
`3 Months
`
`Figure 2. Proportions of Bone-Marrow Plasma Cells Determined
`by Flow Cytometry before and after VAD Therapy in Responsive
`and Unresponsive Patients.
`
`sponses occurred in about 70 per cent of patients who
`were resistant to melphalan, as compared with about
`25 per cent of patients treated with YAP. The marked
`sensitivity of plasma cells was also demonstrated by
`the prompt and marked decrease in bone-marrow
`plasmacytosis, indicating that reductions in myeloma
`protein resulted from a true tumoricidal effect. Since
`all responses were evident after only one course, the
`toxicity could be minimized in patients who were un(cid:173)
`likely to benefit from this treatment, who should be
`offered other investigational therapies. In addition,
`unresponsive patients had a significantly lower RNA
`content in their plasma cells than did responsive pa(cid:173)
`tients. Confirming the important prognostic role of
`plasma cell RNA content in regard to induction of re(cid:173)
`mission, this assessment identified patients who were
`most likely to benefit from this treatment program. 5
`The superior results achieved with Y AD as com(cid:173)
`pared with YAP resulted from one or both of the two
`major alterations in the treatment regimen: dcxamcth(cid:173)
`asone was provided in a higher steroid dose, and a
`prolonged vincristine-doxorubicin dose regimen was
`given; this regimen may have been more effective
`against slowly cycling plasma cells. The important
`therapeutic role of dexamethasone was also support(cid:173)
`ed by the observed responses in 4- of 10 other melpha(cid:173)
`lan-resistant patients who were receiving this steroid
`alone (not included in the present series) and in a
`similar proportion of doxorubicin-resistant patients
`who were receiving YAD (YAD II). These observa-
`
`1 .0
`
`.8
`
`.6
`
`.4
`
`.2
`
`Reeponaa
`O Yea
`e No
`
`No. of P1tlen11
`Total
`Deed
`17
`2
`12
`8
`
`p
`
`0.002
`
`Survival
`<:> Rel1p11·Free
`• Overall
`
`No. of P11len11
`Total
`Fell
`29
`16
`29
`10
`
`prednisone pulses increased the response rate among
`patients with resistant myeloma. 4 Thus, a sixfold
`higher dose of steroid equivalent in the form of
`dexamethasone was combined with continuous infu(cid:173)
`sion of vincristine and doxorubicin. The rationale for
`the protracted administration of vincristine and dox(cid:173)
`orubicin was based on the long gen-
`eration time and low growth frac(cid:173)
`tion of plasma cells in most pa(cid:173)
`tients. 7 Indeed, a greater reduction
`of myeloma cells grown in tissue
`culture has been reported after pro(cid:173)
`longed as opposed to brief expo(cid:173)
`sures to vincristine.8 Since vincris(cid:173)
`tine has a serum-half life of less
`than 30 minutes after administra-
`tion as a bolus, a prolonged infusion
`seemed more appropriate. 9 In addi(cid:173)
`tion to exerting a possibly superior
`antitumor effect, a continuous infu(cid:173)
`sion of doxorubicin would also re(cid:173)
`duce the risk of cardiomyopathy as(cid:173)
`sociated with repeated injections as
`a bolus and would therefore permit
`a longer use of the drug in respond(cid:173)
`ing patients.
`In patients who were resistant
`to alkylating agent-corticosteroid
`combinations, V AD treatment in(cid:173)
`duced a higher frequency of sub-
`stantial tumor reduction in a more
`rapid manner than observed with
`any previous program, either for
`initial or salvage therapy. With a
`>75 per cent reduction of tumor
`mass as a criterion for response, re-
`
`0
`
`6
`
`12
`
`6
`
`12
`
`0
`Months
`Figure 3. Survival from Start of VAD Chemotherapy In Responsive and Unresponsive
`Patients (Left Panel) and Disease-Free Survival In Responsive Patients Compared
`with Overall Survival In the Patient Population (Right Panel).
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org by Keely Southwick on November 21, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` From the NEJM Archive. Copyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`ALVOGEN, Exh. 1032, p. 0003
`
`

`

`1356
`
`THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
`
`May 24, 1984
`
`tions suggest that patients who are resistant to doxoru(cid:173)
`bicin are more likely to be resistant to corticosteroids.
`Such steroid therapy seems appropriate for patients
`with pancytopenia from extensive bone-marrow infil(cid:173)
`tration by plasma cells and for those receiving pallia(cid:173)
`tive radiotherapy when myelosuppressive chemo(cid:173)
`therapy must be delayed.
`The major toxic effect ofVAD was infection, which
`was attributed in part to the intensive steroid pro(cid:173)
`gram -
`a complication noted previously with pulsed
`prednisone therapy. Combined with frequent self(cid:173)
`monitoring for fever, longer periods without any ster(cid:173)
`oid therapy might allow earlier recognition of sepsis
`and recovery from immunosuppression. Less frequent
`infection has resulted from our current program,
`which omits the second and third dexamethasone
`pulses in every second course of VAD. Finally, pre(cid:173)
`viously untreated patients may benefit from alternat(cid:173)
`ing two therapeutic combinations that are unlikely to
`lead to cross-resistance - namely, VAD and melpha(cid:173)
`in an effort to reduce the emergence
`lan-prednisone -
`of drug-resistant tumor clones. 10 Such an approach
`has been successful with alternating combinations
`of mechlorethamine-vincristine-procarbazine-pred(cid:173)
`nisone and doxorubicin-bleomycin-vinblastine-da(cid:173)
`carbazine in the treatment of Hodgkin's disease. 11 It is
`also supported by our experience with three consecu(cid:173)
`tive patients receiving V AD who had further mye(cid:173)
`loma-protein reductions after a stable response was
`
`achieved with standard vincristine-cyclophospha(cid:173)
`mide-doxorubicin-prednisone induction treatment.
`
`We are indebted to Kay Delasalle and Leslie Smallwood for as(cid:173)
`sistance in the data analysis and to Mattie Scott-Thomas for assis(cid:173)
`tance in the preparation of this manuscript.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`I. Kyle RA, Pajak TF, Henderson ES, et al. Multiple myeloma resistant to
`melphalan: treatment with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, carmustinc
`(BCNU), and prednisone. Cancer Treat Rep 1982; 66:451-6.
`2. Bonnet J, Alexanian R, Salmon S, ct al. Vincristine, BCNU, doxorubicin,
`and prednisonc (VPAB) combination in the treatment of relapsing or resist(cid:173)
`ant mycloma: a Southwest Oncology Group study. Cancer Treat Rep 1982;
`66:1267-71.
`3. Alexanian R, Gutterman J, Levy H. Interferon treatment for multiple mye(cid:173)
`loma. Clio Haematol 1982; 11:211-20.
`4. Alexanian R, Yap BS, Bodey GP. Prednisonc pulse therapy for refractory
`myeloma. Blood 1983; 62:572-7.
`5. Barlogic B, Alexanian R, Gehan EA, Smallwood L, Smith T, Drewinko B.
`Marrow cytometry and prognosis in myeloma. J Clin Invest 1983; 72:853-
`61.
`6. McLaughlin P, Alexanian R. Myeloma protein kinetics following chemo(cid:173)
`therapy. Blood 1981; 60:851-9.
`7. Drewinko B, Alexanian R, Boyer H, Barlogie B, Rubinow SI. The growth
`I fraction of human myeloma cells. Blood 1981; 57:333-8.
`8. MacKenzie MR, Larchandini R, Peng R. Plasma cell sensitivity due to
`vincristine, in vitro evidence of increased efficacy of prolonged exposure.
`Presented at the 13th International Congress of Chemotherapy, Vienna,
`August 28-Septembcr 2, 1983.
`9. Jackson DV Jr, Sethi VS, Spurr CL, et al. Pharmacokinetics of vincristine
`infusion. Cancer Treat Rep 1981; 65:1043-8.
`10. Goldie JH, Coldman AJ. A mathematical model for relating the drug sensi(cid:173)
`tivity of tumors to their spontaneous mutation rate. Cancer Treat Rep 1979;
`63:1727-33.
`11. Bonadonna G. Chemotherapy strategies to improve the control of Hodgkin's
`disease. Cancer Res 1982; 42:4309-20.
`
`Massachusetts Medical Society
`Registry on Continuing Medical Education
`To obtain information on continuing medical education courses in the New England area,
`write or call, indicating field(s) or specialty in which information is desired, to the Commit·
`tee on Medical Education, 1440 Main St., Waltham, MA 02254; telephone (617) 893-4610
`(Metropolitan Boston) or WATS 1-800-322-2303 (Massachusetts).
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org by Keely Southwick on November 21, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` From the NEJM Archive. Copyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`ALVOGEN, Exh. 1032, p. 0004
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket