throbber
From
`
`by guest For personal use only.on November 20, 2017.
`www.bloodjournal.org
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A Phase I Trial of Recombinant Human Interleukin-11 (Neumega rhIL-11
`Growth Factor) in Women With Breast Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy
`By Michael S. Gordon, Worta J. McCaskill-Stevens, Linda A. Battiato, John Loewy, David Loesch, Elyse Breeden,
`Ron Hoffman, Kathleen J. Beach, Bernice Kuca, James Kaye, and George W. Sledge, Jr
`
`We performed a phase I trial of recombinant human in-
`terleukin-11 (rhlL-11) in women with breast cancer. Co-
`horts of three t o five women were accrued t o five dosage
`levels of rhlL-11 (10. 25, 50, 75, and 100 pglkgld). rhlL-11
`alone was administered by a daily subcutaneous injection
`for 14 days during a 28-day prechemotherapy "cycle 0."
`Patients (pts) subsequently received up t o four 28-day cy-
`cles of cyclophosphamide (1,500 mg/m*) and doxorubicin
`(60 mg/m2) chemotherapy followed by rhlL-11 at their as-
`signed dose (days 3 through 14). Sixteen pts (13 stage IV,
`3 stage 111B) were accrued t o this study. Median age was
`53 years and median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
`Performance Status was 0. A grade 3 neurologic event was
`seen in 1 pt at 100 pg/kg. Because of the degree of grade
`2 constitutional symptoms (myalgias/arthralgias and fa-
`tigue) at 75 pglkg, dose escalation was stopped and 75
`pg/kg was the maximally tolerated dose. No other grade
`3 or 4 adverse events related t o rhlL-11 were seen. The
`
`T problem for cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.
`
`HROMBOCYTOPENIA has become an increasing
`
`Because the use of the myeloid colony-stimulating factors
`(CSFs) has reduced the incidence of febrile neutropenia after
`standard-dose chemotherapy, the administration of more
`dose-intensive chemotherapy regimens has been pursued.'
`As a result, greater degrees of acute and prolonged thrombo-
`cytopenia are increasingly being observed. This has resulted
`in an increased utilization of platelet transfusions with the
`inherent increased risk of transfusion-related infectious com-
`plications. In addition, the quality of life of those patients
`requiring frequent blood counts and transfusions is impaired.
`Although the use of reinfused peripheral blood (PB) progeni-
`tor cells has reduced the degree of thrombocytopenia associ-
`ated with high-dose chemotherapy, this technology is cum-
`bersome and costly. No currently available hematopoietic
`growth factor routinely reduces the degree of thrombocyto-
`penia secondary to cytotoxic chemotherapy in a manner sim-
`ilar to that of the myeloid CSFs.
`Interleukin- 1 1 (IL- 1 1) is a pleiotropic hematopoietic
`growth factor initially detected in the conditioned medium
`derived from the immortalized primate bone marrow (BM)
`stromal cell line PU-34.' The activity of this agent was char-
`acterized by its stimulation of the proliferation of the IL-6-
`dependent plasmacytoma cell line, TI 165. This effect was
`not eliminated by the addition of anti-IL-6 antibodies, show-
`ing that this was a unique factor. The human homologue of
`the IL-11 gene was isolated from a lung fibroblast cell line
`and encoded a 19-kD protein comprised of 178 amino acids.
`This gene is located on chromosome 19.'
`In vitro, IL-11 synergizes with other hematopoietic growth
`factors (eg, IL-3 and c-kit ligand) promoting the proliferation
`of various classes of hematopoietic progenitor cells commit-
`ted to a variety of lineage^.^.^ As a single agent, IL-11 in-
`duces the maturation of early megakaryocytes by increasing
`megakaryocyte size and ploidy.6 In preclinical in vivo mod-
`els, IL- 1 1 stimulates platelet production in normal animals,
`including mice and nonhuman primates. This effect is dose-
`
`administration of rhlL-11 was not associated with fever.
`Reversible grade 2 fatigue and myalgiaslarthralgias were
`seen in all pts at 75 pglkg. Weight gain of 3% t o 590 associ-
`ated with edema was seen at doses >10 pg/kg but a capil-
`lary leak syndrome was not seen. rhlL-11 alone was associ-
`ated with a mean 7690, 93%. 108%. and 185% increase in
`platelet counts at doses of 10,25,50, and 75 pg/kg. respec-
`tively. No significant changes in leukocytes were seen. A
`mean 19% decrease in hematocrit was observed. Acute-
`phase proteins increased with treatment at all doses.
`Compared with patients at the 10 pg/kg dose, patients
`receiving doses 225 pg/kg experienced less thrombocyto-
`penia in the first t w o cycles of chemotherapy. We conclude
`that rhlL-11 has thrombopoietic activity at all doses stud-
`ied, is well tolerated at doses of 10,25, and 50 pg/kg, and
`at doses 225 pg/kg has the potential t o reduce chemo-
`therapy-induced thrombocytopenia in this model.
`0 1996 by The American Society of Hematology.
`
`related and is characterized by increases in peripheral platelet
`counts, which peak approximately 14 to 21 days after initia-
`tion of administrati~n.'.~ Multilineage effects, including in-
`creases in reticulocytes and white blood cell (WBC) subsets,
`have been seen in several of these preclinical models.' After
`the administration of chemotherapy to mice, IL- 1 1 signifi-
`cantly accelerates the multilineage recovery of hematopoie-
`s ~ s . ~ When IL-11 is administered in a murine transplant
`model, it demonstrates similar multilineage effects, acceler-
`ating the recovery of platelets, neutrophils, and reticulo-
`cytes."
`Based on its in vitro and in vivo preclinical thrombopoietic
`activity, we hypothesized that IL-11, having potential throm-
`bopoietic activity and multilineage hematologic effects,
`would be an ideal hematopoietic growth factor to diminish
`the degree of chemotherapy-related thrombocytopenia. Our
`goal was to assess the safety and biologic properties of the
`recombinant protein (Neumega rhIL-11 growth factor; rhIL-
`1 1). In our study, rhIL- 11 was administered to women with
`breast cancer both before and after dose-intensive chemo-
`
`From Section of Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University
`School of Medicine, Indianapolis; Hematology/Oncology Section,
`University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago; Community
`Hospital of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN; and Genetics Institute,
`Cambridge, MA.
`Submitted October IO, 1995; accepted February 13, 1996.
`Supported by Genetics Institute and in part by Public Health
`Service Grant No. MOI RR750. M.S.G. is a recipient of an American
`Cancer Society Clinical Oncology Career Development Award.
`Address reprint requests to Michael S. Gordon, MD, UH-I 730,
`550 N University Blvd, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5265.
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page
`charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked
`"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section I734 solely to
`indicate this fact.
`0 1996 by The American Society of Hematology.
`0ooS-4971/96/8709-08$3.00/0
`
`Blood, Vol 87, No 9 (May 1). 1996: pp 3615-3624
`
`3615
`
`ALVOGEN, Exh. 1021, p. 0001
`
`

`

`by guest For personal use only.on November 20, 2017.
`www.bloodjournal.org
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From
`
`3616
`
`therapy. We report that rhIL-11 is well tolerated at clinically
`relevant doses and has thrombopoietic activity in women
`with normal hematopoiesis. When administered after the ad-
`ministration of dose-intensive chemotherapy, rhIL- 1 1 at
`doses of 25 to 75 pgkg subcutaneously (SC) daily has the
`ability to attenuate the development of severe thrombocyto-
`penia.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Parienr eligibility. Women with pathologically confirmed breast
`cancer that was either locally advanced (stage IIIB) or metastatic
`(stage 1V) were eligible for the study if they met the following
`criteria: age 18 years or older; practicing an approved method of
`birth control with a negative Beta Human Chorionic Gonadotropin
`(P-HCG) pregnancy test (if appropriate); an Eastern Cooperative
`Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 5 1; at least 4 weeks
`from prior adjuvant chemotherapy with complete recovery from all
`toxicity; adequate hepatic and renal function (total bilirubin level
`52.0 mg/dL, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) 5 3 0 mg/dL, serum creati-
`nine level 52.0 mg/dL); normal left ventricular ejection fraction
`(250% on radionuclide ejection fraction [RNEF]); no prior cbemo-
`therapy for metastatic disease; and no clinically significant cardiac
`or metabolic disease. Patients were required to be seronegative for
`human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B surface antigen.
`Patients with a history of thromboembolic phenomena, prior doxo-
`rubicin exposure of >250 mg/m2, those who were anticipated to
`require radiation therapy during the course of the study, had a contra-
`indication to delaying chemotherapy for 4 weeks, or were receiving
`treatment with corticosteroids, aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflamma-
`tory agents, or anticoagulant drugs were excluded. We also excluded
`patients with a documented history of brain metastases or seizures,
`or other cancer within 5 years of study entry (with the exception of
`carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix or surgically cured nonmela-
`noma skin cancer). Patients were also ineligible if they had received
`radiation therapy or surgery within 2 weeks before study entry, had
`undergone prior pelvic irradiation at any time, or were treated with
`any investigational agent or cytokine within 4 weeks of study entry.
`All patients were required to give written informed consent, and the
`protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the
`Indiana University School of Medicine.
`Study medication. Escherichia coli-derived, nonglycosylated
`rhIL-11 (Neumega rhIL-11 growth factor) was provided by Genetics
`Institute (Cambridge, MA). Vials containing 5 mg/mL of rhIL-ll
`in 1 mL of USP Sterile water for injection were used. Vials were
`used only once and then discarded. The specific activity of the rhIL-
`I 1 was determined by a bioassay on the basis of [3H]-thymidine
`incorporation in a responsive cell line and was >0.6 X IO6 U/mg.
`The study agent contained less than 1 ng of endotoxin by Limulus
`amoebocyte lysate assay Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and Neu-
`pogen (Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA) (granulocyte colony-stimu-
`lating factor [G-CSF]) were obtained commercially.
`Study design.
`The study schema is shown in Fig 1. In this open-
`label, nonrandomized phase I trial, 16 patients were enrolled between
`December 1992 and December 1993. Cohorts of three to five patients
`were accrued to each of four planned dose levels of rhIL-11 including
`10, 25, 50, and 75 pg/kg/d. rbIL-11 was administered as a daily
`subcutaneous injection for 14 days followed by a 14-day washout
`period during a 28-day prechemotherapy safety period termed cycle
`0. Patients were observed for 6 hours in the General Clinical Re-
`search Center at Indiana University Medical Center after each of the
`first three doses of rhIL- 11 and continued to be treated as outpatients
`thereafter.
`After completion of cycle 0, patients received up to four monthly
`cycles of chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide 1,500 mg/
`
`GORDON ET AL
`
`rhlL-11 -
`
`I
`
`1
`
`Day
`
`I
`
`14
`
`Cycle 0
`
`I
`
`28
`
`Day
`
`1 3
`
`I
`
`14
`
`Cycles 1-4
`
`28 I
`
`Fig 1. Study schema. Cohorts of at least three patients were ac-
`crued to each of the planned dose levels of rhlL-11. During the preche-
`motherapy phase termed cycle 0, rhlL-11 was administered by a daily
`SC injection for 14 consecutive days followed by 14 days of observa-
`tion. Subsequently, patients received up to four monthly cycles of
`chemotherapy. Cyclophosphamide (1,500 mg/mz) and doxorubicin
`(60 mg/m') were administered on day 1 of each cycle (dark arrow),
`followed by daily SC injections of rhlL-11 at their assigned dose for
`12 days (days 3 through 14).
`
`m2 and doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 on the first day of each 28-day cycle.
`All patients received rhIL-I1 at their assigned dose for 12 days (days
`3 through 14) following the administration of chemotherapy. Any
`patient who experienced severe neutropenia defined as a febrile neu-
`tropenic event or an absolute neutrophil count 5500 cells/pL for
`more than 5 days during cycles 1 or 2 were eligible to receive
`Neupogen at a dose of 5 pgkgld administered SC from day 3 through
`neutrophil recovery (absolute neutrophil count 22,000 cells/pL for
`3 days) in cycles 3 and 4. There was no intrapatient dose escalation
`allowed. If at any time the platelet count increased to greater than
`600,00O/pL during rhIL-l 1 administration, rhIL-11 was diston-
`tinued during that cycle of therapy.
`Dose escalation was based on adverse events seen in cycle 0
`only and was allowed if none of the three patients at a given dose
`experienced grade 3 or greater adverse events in the first 14 days
`of IL-I 1 therapy. If one of the three patients experienced a serious
`adverse event, an additional two patients were added to that cohort.
`Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as the dose which resulted
`in two or more patients with grade 3 or greater toxicity. The maxi-
`mally tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the dose level immedi-
`ately below that which resulted in DLT. An additional three patients
`were allowed to be accrued to either the MTD or, in the absence of
`establishing an MTD, to a safe, biologically active dose. These
`additional patients did not receive rhIL-11 during cycle 0, and were
`treated only in cycles 1 through 4 of the study. Patients experiencing
`grade 3 or greater toxicity were removed from the study. All toxici-
`ties were graded according to the World Health Organization (WHO)
`common toxicity criteria."
`All patients underwent a thorough physical exami-
`Evaluations.
`nation including vital signs and ECOG performance status before
`enrollment on the study. This evaluation was repeated at intervals
`throughout the study. An RNEF (MUGA scan) was performed before
`
`ALVOGEN, Exh. 1021, p. 0002
`
`

`

`From
`
`by guest For personal use only.on November 20, 2017.
`www.bloodjournal.org
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PHASE I TRIAL OF rhlL-11
`
`Table 1. Characteristics of Patients
`
`No. of patients
`Median age (range)
`Median ECOG PS (range)
`Stage
`Ill6
`IV
`Menopausal status
`Premenopausal
`Postmenopausal
`
`16
`53 (26-67)
`0 (0-1)
`
`3
`13
`
`4
`12
`
`enrollment and repeated after the second and fourth cycles of chemo-
`therapy. A chest radiograph and electrocardiogram were obtained at
`baseline, after the completion of rhIL-11 administration in cycle 0
`(day 15, cycle 0) and at the end of cycle 0 (day 28). Complete blood
`counts including a manual differential count, absolute reticulocyte
`count, and an automated quantitation of platelet size were obtained
`at baseline and three times per week during cycles 0 through 4.
`Patients who developed platelet counts ~600,000/pL during cycle
`0 underwent daily complete blood counts until the platelet count
`decreased to below this level. Urinalysis, coagulation profiles, serum
`chemistries, and serum levels of acute phase proteins (C-reactive
`protein, fibrinogen, and haptoglobin) were performed at baseline and
`at varying intervals during cycles 0 through 4.
`BM aspirates and trephine biopsies for morphology, progenitor
`cell numbers, immunophenotyping, and megakaryocyte ploidy anal-
`ysis were performed at baseline and after completion of rhIL- 11
`administration in cycle 0 (day 15, cycle 0).
`Serum samples were evaluated
`Serum anti-ll-ll antibodies.
`for the development of anti-IL-11 antibodies by an enzyme-linked
`immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA). Serum samples were obtained at
`baseline, on day 15 of cycle 0, and before the start of each cycle of
`chemotherapy (cycles 1 through 4) and at the follow-up visit 4 weeks
`after the end of the last chemotherapy cycle.
`Clinical response criteria.
`Tumor measurements were obtained
`at baseline, after completion of cycle 0, and after the second and
`fourth cycles of chemotherapy. Clinical response was evaluated by
`comparing tumor measurements obtained from radiographic or phys-
`ical examination findings. Standard Eastern Cooperative Oncology
`Group breast cancer response criteria were used. Any patient who
`was found to have progressive disease at any time was removed
`from the study.
`Statistical analysis.
`Dose-limiting criteria were defined by stan-
`dard criteria based on the dose-escalation schema outlined above.
`Analysis of changes in serum chemistries and acute-phase proteins
`was performed using a two-sided Student’s paired t-test. Results of
`hematologic parameters were reported as mean or median values.
`When appropriate, 95% confidence intervals were calculated and
`presented.
`
`RESULTS
`Patient characteristics. Sixteen patients with pathologi-
`cally confirmed breast cancer (3 stage IIIB, 13 stage IV)
`were accrued to this phase I trial. Pretreatment characteristics
`and extent of diseaselprior therapy are shown in Tables 1
`and 2. All 16 were eligible for assessment of safety. Thirteen
`patients received rhIL-11 during cycle 0: 12 patients were
`enrolled in cohorts of 3 at the 10, 25, 50, and 75 pgkg dose
`levels and 1 patient was enrolled at the 100 pgkg dose level.
`After the completion of dose escalation, an additional three
`patients were accrued to the 50 pgkg dose cohort to gain
`
`3617
`
`additional information about the effects of rhIL-11 at this
`dose after chemotherapy. The median age for patients treated
`on this study was 53 years (range, 26 to 67 years). Median
`ECOG performance status was 0 (range, 0 to 1). Nine pa-
`tients had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy, including
`4 who received prior radiation therapy (including patient
`number 008 at the 50 pgkg dose who had previously re-
`ceived lumbar radiotherapy) and 5 who received prior hor-
`monal therapy. Among the remaining patients, 2 had re-
`ceived prior radiotherapy and hormonal therapy, 2 had
`received prior hormonal therapy only, and 3 had received
`no prior therapy (all with stage IIIB disease).
`Treatment with rhIL-11 was generally well
`ZL-11 safety.
`tolerated. All side effects were reported regardless of their
`presumed relationship to rhIL-11 (Table 3). When the rhIL-
`11 alone cycle (cycle 0) is analyzed, the most common side
`effect is a therapy-related anemia that occurred in 11 of 11
`patients who completed this phase of the trial. This anemia
`(-20% decrease in hematocrit) generally developed within
`2 to 3 days of the initiation of IL-11 dosing and resolved
`over a 1- to 2-week period after completion of IL-11 therapy.
`Plasma volume studies performed in three patients showed
`increased plasma volumes (20%, 18%, and 21%) from days
`2 to 15. No patient experienced significant blood loss or had
`any laboratory evidence of hemolysis. These increases in
`plasma volume are consistent with the development of the
`anemia.
`The other most frequently reported side effects during
`cycle 0 included constitutional symptoms including arthral-
`gias and myalgias, fatigue, nausea, and headache. Edema of
`the extremities was seen in all except one patient treated at
`doses 2 2 5 pgkg and was primarily dependent in nature.
`The edema typically developed in the second week of rhIL-
`11 therapy and resolved after completion of the 14 days of
`treatment. No clinically significant fevers nor capillary leak
`syndromes were seen in patients receiving rhIL- 1 1 during
`cycle 0. Although the majority of the side effects seen were
`mild-moderate (grade 1-2), the constitutional symptoms and
`edema were believed to be dose-related and were more in-
`tense at doses 250 pgkgld. When cycles of IL-11 adminis-
`tered after chemotherapy were evaluated, a similar toxicity
`profile was observed. No other unexpected adverse events
`were identified.
`Five patients were removed from study for adverse events
`believed to be possibly or probably related to the study drug
`(Table 4). Only one patient was removed from study during
`cycle 0 for a severe adverse event (grade 3 or higher). This
`patient, the first treated at the 100-pgkg dose level, experi-
`enced the onset of an expressive aphasia after three doses
`of rhIL-11. Computed tomographic (CT) scan of the head
`showed a 1- to 2-cm left Brocha’s infarct and rhIL-11 ther-
`apy was discontinued. Her platelet count at the time of ad-
`mission for the event was 220,0001pL and her fibrinogen
`level was 670 mg/dL. The patient underwent noninvasive
`doppler evaluation of her carotid arteries which demon-
`strated no clinically significant vaso-occlusive disease. With
`continued observation, the patient recovered to her baseline
`neurologic status. A second patient, with a history of hyper-
`tension, treated at the 50 pgkg dose, was removed after
`
`ALVOGEN, Exh. 1021, p. 0003
`
`

`

`From
`
`3618
`
`by guest For personal use only.on November 20, 2017.
`www.bloodjournal.org
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Table 2. Extent of Prior Therapy and Sites of Disaase for Enrolled Patients
`
`GORDON ET AL
`
`Pt. No.
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`
`Age
`56
`67
`59
`54
`44
`36
`52
`60
`66
`37
`54
`64
`67
`26
`48
`52
`
`Prior Adj Chemo
`Prior RT
`Radiated Sitek)
`Interval
`CMF
`Y
`Chest Wall
`17 m o
`CMF
`29 m o
`N
`NIA
`CAFICMF
`19 m o
`N
`NIA
`CMF
`12 m o
`N
`NIA
`None
`NIA
`N
`NIA
`None
`NIA
`N
`NIA
`CAF
`100 m o
`Y
`Breast
`None
`N/A
`Y
`Lumbar spine
`None
`NIA
`N
`NIA
`CMF
`Y
`Breast
`12 m o
`CMF
`Y
`Breast
`34 m o
`None
`NIA
`N
`NIA
`None
`NfA
`Y
`Breast
`NIA
`N
`NIA
`None
`CMF
`7 m o
`N
`NIA
`CMF
`19 m o
`N
`NIA
`Abbreviations: CMF. cyclophosphamidelmethotrexateIfluorouraciI; CAF, cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/fluorouraciI; Pt. No, patient number;
`Adi Chemo, adjuvant chemotherapy; RT, radiotherapy; NED, no evidence of disease; LN, lymph node; Y, yes; N, no; NIA, not applicable.
`
`Stage
`IV
`IV
`IV
`IV
`IllB
`IV
`IV
`IV
`IllB
`IV
`IV
`IV
`IV
`IllB
`IV
`IV
`
`Site(s) of Disease
`Bone
`Liver
`Liver
`NED
`Breast
`NED
`LN
`BonefChest Wall
`Breast
`LNIBreast
`Pulmonary
`Pulmonary
`Pulmonary
`Breast
`Chest Wall
`NED
`
`identification of a 1- to 2-cm intracerebral bleed at the time
`of the nadir of her blood counts following chemotherapy
`during cycle 1. This patient was admitted to the hospital
`with an episode of neutropenic fever and staphylococcal
`sepsis. Mental status changes were investigated with a CT
`scan of the head, which showed a small intracerebral bleed
`in the setting of chronic hypertensive cerebrovascular dis-
`ease. The patient was removed from study and recovered
`completely with no significant sequelae from this event. The
`third patient, enrolled on the 75-ygkg dose level, withdrew
`from the study after completion of cycle 1 because of what
`she perceived as unacceptable constitutional symptoms char-
`acterized by fatigue, arthralgias and myalgias, and edema.
`A final two patients were removed because of indwelling
`catheter-related complications of infection and thrombosis.
`Reasons for the removal of additional patients who failed to
`complete the entire four cycles of chemotherapy included:
`progression of disease (two patients), change in therapy to
`
`Table 3. Adverse Clinical Effects of rhlL-11 During Cycle 0
`(All Grade 1 and 21
`
`rhlL-11 (pglkgid)
`
`10
`
`3
`
`1
`
`2
`
`0
`3
`3 0
`3
`0
`3
`0
`2
`0
`1
`0
`2
`0
`0
`3
`0
`0
`
`25
`
`3
`
`50
`
`3
`
`1
`
`1
`1
`1
`2
`1
`3
`0
`2
`0
`
`2
`
`2
`0
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`1
`0
`
`1
`
`1
`2
`1
`2
`1
`1
`1
`0
`2
`
`2
`
`2
`0
`2
`0
`0
`1
`1
`0
`0
`
`75
`
`3
`
`1
`
`2
`
`2
`0
`1
`1
`3
`0
`0
`1
`1
`1
`1
`2
`1
`1
`1 1
`2
`0
`
`100
`
`1
`
`1
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`1
`0
`1
`0
`
`2
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No. Assessable Pts
`
`WHO Grade
`
`Anemia
`Arthralgia/myalgia
`Fatigue
`Rhinorrhea
`Nausea
`Edema
`Headache
`Injection site rxn
`Tachycardia
`
`Abbreviation: rxn, reaction.
`
`BM transplant (one patient), and neutropenic sepsis (one
`patient).
`Anti-rhIL- 1 1 antibody
`Serum anti-rhlL-11 antibodies,
`formation was assessed in all 16 patients. Two subjects were
`observed to demonstrate an anti-rhIL-11 response that was
`consistent with antibody formation as a result of product
`exposure. Of these two, one subject showed a positive re-
`sponse at the follow-up visit only, but had insufficient sample
`to confirm the authenticity of this titer. The other subject
`had a relatively low titer 14 days after product exposure,
`and although this subject did not have a detectable titer at
`the follow-up visit (26 days postexposure), there was a faint
`reactivity with the rhIL-11 band when this sample was ana-
`lyzed by Western immunoblot analysis.
`Hematologic effects of IL-1 I during cycle 0.
`In the first
`course of therapy IL-11 was administered alone, 4 weeks
`before chemotherapy, to allow the evaluation of the safety
`as well as the hematologic and hematopoietic effects of IL-
`1 1 . Treatment with IL- 11 alone was associated with a dose-
`related increase in platelet counts. Increases of 76%, 93%,
`108%, and 185% over baseline values were seen at the
`IO-, 2 5 , 50-, and 75-pgkg/d dose levels, respectively (Fig
`2A through D). This thrombocytosis was characterized by
`an initial slight transient decrease in platelets within the
`first 2 days of IL-I 1 therapy. Subsequently, platelet counts
`gradually increased to their peak levels over the 2 weeks of
`treatment. Maximal platelet counts occurred at a median of
`18, 19, 16, and 14 days from the initiation of therapy for
`
`Table 4. Reasons for Discontinuation of rhlL-11 Therapy
`
`Pt. No. Dose (pglkg)
`
`Reason
`
`009
`010
`012
`013
`016
`
`50
`75
`75
`100
`50
`
`Intracerebral bleed during nadir
`Intolerable grade 2 constitutional and edema
`Central catheter thrombosis
`Right parietal cerebrovascular accident
`Central catheter thrombosis
`
`ALVOGEN, Exh. 1021, p. 0004
`
`

`

`From
`
`by guest For personal use only.on November 20, 2017.
`www.bloodjournal.org
`
`
`
`
`
`
`e
`
`'Oo0
`
`3. -
`= 800
`700
`r 5 600
`2 500
`0
`
`l
`
`-t 002
`
`3619
`
`
`
`900 - -
`
`t 800
`0 0
`," 700
`
`X
`I
`
`600
`
`C
`500
`u
`400
`0 -
`2 300
`-
`n
`200
`
`u
`
`400
`
`c ; 300 : 200
`
`c
`
`100
`
`0
`
`j
`
`loo0 900
`
`700
`0 r
`
`8 400
`,0°1
`300
`
`200
`
`100
`
`0 4 8 12 1 6 20 24 28
`
`loo 0
`
`0
`
`4
`
`8 12 16 20 24 2 8
`
`-
`
`Oo7
`
`-t-
`
`l
`
`A
`
`i
`
`D
`
`
`
`1000 1
`j -0- 010
`900 -
`3 800 .
`0 8 700
`r
`X
`600
`c 5 500
`u
`400
`
`-
`100 1
`
`I
`0
`5 300
`m
`
`200
`
`PHASE I TRIAL OF rhlL-11
`
`Fig 2. Thrombopoirtic &e&
`of rhll-11 during cy-
`cle 0. Before the administration of chemotherapy,
`rhlL-11 was administered for 14 consecutive days
`(days 1 through 14) followed by 14 days of observa-
`tion (days 15 through 28). Platelet counts for ell pa-
`tients treated at the lo-, 25-, 50-, and 75-pglkgld
`dose levels are shown in (A) through ID), respec-
`tively.
`
`0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28
`
`day of treatment
`
`
`
`-
`
`0
`
`0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28
`day of treatment
`
`the four dose levels, respectively. After completion of rhIL-
`11 therapy, platelet counts gradually decreased, and all re-
`turned to baseline pretreatment values by the initiation of
`cycle 1. There were no significant changes in the mean plate-
`let volume after IL-11 therapy at any doses studied and
`platelet aggregometry performed pretreatment and on day
`15 demonstrated no consistent evidence of an IL- 11 -related
`effect on platelet function.
`IL-11 was associated with a decrease in hematocrit which,
`at the doses studied in this trial, was not dose-related. This
`phenomenon is graphically displayed in Fig 3A and B. An
`initial decrease in hemoglobin levels was identified within
`48 hours of the initiation of therapy and continued through
`the course of treatment. A mean 20% decrease in hematocrits
`was identified for all patients at all doses. This effect was
`associated with a modest reticulocytosis (data not shown).
`IL-11 had no detectable effects on the numbers of WBCs or
`subsets of WBCs.
`Hematologic effects of IL-11 afer chemotherapy.
`Of the
`16 patients enrolled on the study, 12 received rhIL-11 at
`their assigned dose after at least two cycles of chemotherapy.
`
`The median platelet counts for the first cycle of chemother-
`apy are shown in Fig 4. Although no patient developed se-
`vere thrombocytopenia in the first cycle of chemotherapy
`(defined as a platelet count <20,OOO/pL), the median nadir
`platelet counts for patients receiving rhIL-11 at doses 2 2 5
`mgkg/d appear to be higher compared with those patients
`treated at the 10-pg/kg/d dose. Table 5 reports the nadir
`platelet counts for each patient across the first two cycles of
`planned chemotherapy. Mean nadir platelet counts of 67,
`159, 152, and 161,OOO/pL were seen during the first cycle
`in the lo-, 25-,50-, and 75-pgkgld dose levels, respectively.
`This apparent attenuation of thrombocytopenia at doses of
`25, 50, and 75 pgkg was also evident during the second
`cycle of therapy where mean nadir platelet counts of 44,OOO,
`140,000, 126,000, and 102,000/yL were seen for the four
`doses, respectively. Unfortunately, patient drop-out (only 9
`patients completed cycle 3 and 7 completed cycle 4) makes
`the evaluation of IL-11's effects on thrombocytopenia in the
`latter two cycles difficult. However, there does appear to be
`a trend toward a continued attenuation of severe thrombocy-
`topenia at doses 2 2 5 pg/kg/d. Platelet transfusions were
`
`ALVOGEN, Exh. 1021, p. 0005
`
`

`

`From
`
`3620
`
`I*
`
`by guest For personal use only.on November 20, 2017.
`www.bloodjournal.org
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I 001 -
`002 -
`003 -
`004 -
`
`005
`I 006
`
`'-
`
`rnnn .
`
`GORDON ET AL
`
`I
`0 700
`0 0
`
`600
`
`500
`
`- -
`.
`-
`E
`0 -
`" 400
`J
`< 300
`L m -
`
`200
`
`100
`
`0
`
`1
`
`3
`
`5
`
`8
`
`1 0 1 2 15 1 7 1 9 2 2 2 4 2 6
`
`Days of Cycle 1
`
`Fig 4. Median platelet counts during cycle 1 of chemotherapy.
`The median platalet counts for patients treated at doses of 10 to 75
`pglkgld of rhlL-11 in cycle 1 of chemotherapy are shown. Nadir plate-
`let counts for all doses occurred on or around day 12 of the cycle.
`
`20 !
`
`0
`
`.
`
`I
`4
`
`.
`
`I
`8
`
`.
`
`.
`
`,
`1 2
`
`I
`1 6
`
`.
`
`I
`
`20
`
`.
`
`I
`24
`
`.
`
`28 508
`- -
`-
`011 -
`c - 40b
`
`Q
`
`.-
`
`010
`
`012
`
`I
`
`cycle appeared to be constant during each of the cycles of
`therapy. Eight patients were transfused with packed red
`blood cells a total of 1 1 times, with three of these eight
`patients having two transfusions each.
`IL-11 did not ameliorate the leukopenia or neutropenia
`associated with our moderately dose-intensive chemother-
`
`e
`
`0
`
`1 2
`
`1 6
`
`2 0
`
`2'4
`
`day of treatment
`
`2'8
`
`~
`
`~
`
`Dose
`(pg/kgl
`
`10
`
`Fig 3. Effects of rhlL-11 on hematocrit in cycle 0. During cycle 0,
`e transient rhlL-11 -related anemia was identified. Hematocrit values
`for patients treated at the 10- and 25-pglkg (AI as well as 50- and
`75-pglkg IB) dose levels are shown. The anemia was rapid in onset
`and maximal on or about day 14 of the cycle. Gradual recovary to
`pretreatment levels were seen after completion of rhlL-11 therapy.
`No patient required transfusion for this rhlL-11 -related anemia.
`
`required once each during cycles 3 and 4 in only one patient
`in the 10 pg/kg cohort (patient 001).
`IL-11 administration did not appear to increase the degree
`of chemotherapy-induced anemia. A mean 20% decrease in
`hematocrits was seen across all cycles of therapy similar to
`that seen in cycle 0. Similar to the anemia seen in cycle 0,
`the IL-11 -related anemia in the chemotherapy cycles was
`generally reversible after completion of IL- 1 1 therapy. Al-
`though there did appear to be a component of cumulative
`myelosuppression in those patients receiving three to four
`cycles of chemotherapy, the impact of the IL- 11 in any given
`
`25
`
`50
`
`75
`
`Table 5. Effect of rhlL-11 on Platrlet Counts
`After Chemotherapy (Cycles 1 and 2)
`
`Pt.
`No.
`
`001
`002
`003
`Mean
`
`004
`005
`006
`Mean
`
`007
`008
`009
`014
`015
`016
`Mean
`
`01 0
`01 1
`012
`Mean
`
`~~
`
`~~~
`
`Cycle 1 (xl.OOO/pLl
`
`~
`
`Cycle 2 ~x1,OOO/~Ll
`
`Pretreatment
`
`Nadir
`
`Pretreatment
`
`Nadir
`
`276
`233
`202
`237
`
`313
`368
`320
`334
`
`252
`161
`436
`291
`309
`197
`274
`
`274
`199
`467
`313
`
`45
`73
`83
`67
`
`124
`209
`145
`159
`
`159
`89
`160
`142
`172
`189
`152
`
`143
`93
`246
`161
`
`266
`340
`-*
`303
`
`45 1
`239
`303
`331
`
`283
`193
`-*
`261
`297
`283
`263
`-*
`373
`405
`389
`
`37
`51
`-*
`44
`
`123
`195
`102
`140
`
`172
`61
`-*
`126
`118
`151
`126
`-*
`86
`118
`102
`
`Data not available because patient discontinued particiption in
`study.
`
`ALVOGEN, Exh. 1021, p. 0006
`
`

`

`From
`
`by guest For personal use only.on November 20, 2017.
`www.bloodjournal.org
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PHASE I TRIAL OF rhlL-11
`
`apy. Based on this observation, patients experiencing severe
`neutropenia (defined as an absolute neutrophil count 4 0 0
`cells/pL for >5 days) or an episode of neutropenic fever in
`cycles 1 or 2 were allowed to receive standard regimens of
`G-CSF (5 ygkg SC once daily) in cycles 3 and 4. A total
`of 33 cycles of chemotherapy were administered without G-
`CSF, whereas seven patients were treated with G-CSF during
`a total of nine cycles of chemotherapy. During cycles in
`which G-CS

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket