throbber
HAS
`
`$OaNTINSTTLTIZIG-FERqSIESRetwd
`E*RDITS&
`
`BFFRr.|
`
`Le!
`
`¥. Ve eRr Vb ae
`
`doy oy
`et
`
`Blood.
`v. 102, no. 11, pt. 4
`Genera! Collection
`it vy meSTE
`
`(Nov. 16 2003)
`
`re
`
`Gx,
`mur
`
`iar
`
`‘ “|
`aah penbs
`
`BPMae monet art NY
`Een
`perine
`
`oe
`eye}
`
`WFFEFILIIIZIG~
`
`WTwebIFsWeAHIIT-
`
`SERBIAASieEAS?
`
`MEDICINE Celgene Ex. 2011, Page 1
`
`PROPERTY OF THE
`NATIONAL
`LIBRARY OF
`
`IPR2018-01714
`Celgene Ex. 2011, Page 1
`
`

`

`
`
`JOURNAL OF
`
`THE AMERICAN
`
`SOCIETY OF
`
`HEMATOLOGY
`
`Blood, Journal of The American Society of Hematology
`(print
`ISSN 0006-4971, online ISSN 1528-0020),
`is
`published 25 times (in 2 volumes) per year by The
`American Society of Hematology (ASH). 1900 M Street,
`NW,Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036, Dates ofissue
`are the Ist and the 15th of each month, except
`in
`November, when 3 issues are published. Printed in the
`United States of America. Periodicals postage paid at
`Washington, DC, and additional mailing offices.
`Postmaster: Send change-of-address information to
`BloodJournal, PO Box 10812, Birmingham, AL 35202-
`0812.
`
`Manuscript submissions
`
`the Author Guide printed in each issue of
`Consult
`Blood (and posted on the web site at www.blood
`journal.org) before submitting your manuscript online at
`http://blood. manuscriptcentral.com.
`
`2004 subscription rates
`United States and possessions: individial, $532; insti-
`tution, $960. All other countries:
`individual, $747;
`institution, $1155. There is no additional charge for
`surface delivery to any area outside the United States and
`possessions, Forairmail delivery, add $165 to your subscrip-
`tion price. Blood offers a reduced rate for students,
`interns, and residents who are in approved hematology
`or oncology programs: United States and possessions,
`$244; all other countries, $667. To qualify, supply your
`name, datesofstudy, and the signature of your academic
`advisoroninstitutional letterhead. Orders will be billed
`at the individual rate until proofofstatus is received.
`Price for single/back issues: $40/48. Single issues,
`both current and back, exist in limited quantities andare
`offered for sale subject to availability.
`Pay-per-view: Full-text online access to all articles
`is free one year after publication. Nonsubscribers may
`purchase 24-hour access to the full text of any article
`published in the preceding 12 months through the
`pay-per-view option on the Blood website.
`
`Subscription information, claims,
`and changesof address
`Customer service for subscribers: 1-800-633-4931 (US
`and Canada); 1-205-995-1567 (outside US and Canada).
`Correspondence regarding subscriptions and changes
`of address should be addressed to Blood Journal Sub-
`scription Office, PO Box 10812, Birmingham, AL
`35202-0812. Checks should be made payable to “Blood
`Subscriptions.”
`ASHMembers should sendtheir change-of-address
`information to the ASH Membership Department, 1900
`M Street, NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036.
`All change-of-address notices should be sent at least
`6 weeks before the first issue is to be mailed to the new
`address. Provide both old and newaddresses.
`Claims: Claims will be honoredif received within 3
`months of the month of issue. A maximumof3 claims
`
`per subscription percalendar year will be honored.
`
`Internet
`
`Blood HomePage: www.bloodjournaLorg.
`
`ASH HomePage: www.hematology.org.
`
`Copyright
`Copyright © 2003 by The American Society of Hematol-
`ogy. All rights reserved. Nopart ofthis publication may
`be reproduced (see exception below), stored in a re-
`trieval system, translated, or transmitted in any form or
`by any means now or hereafter known, electronic or
`mechanical, without permission in writing from the
`Publisher, The American Society of Hematology. Ad-
`dress for correspondence: Blood Publishing Office, 1900
`M Street, NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036. For
`further information on rights and permissions, visit us
`online at www.bloodjournal.org/misc/rights.shtml.
`The copyright owner consents that copies of
`articles may be made for personal or internal use, or
`for the personal or internal use of specific clients, for
`those registered with the Copyright Clearance Center,
`Inc (222 RosewoodDrive, Danvers, MA 01923; (978)
`750-8400; www.copyright.com). This consent is given
`on the condition that
`the copier pay the stated
`per-copy fees through the Copyright Clearance Cen-
`ter, Inc, for copying beyondthat permitted by Sections
`107 and 108 of the US Copyright Law (Fair Use). This
`consent does not extend to other kinds of copying,
`such as copying for general distribution, for advertis-
`ing or promotional purposes, for creating newcollec-
`tive works, or for resale. For those kinds of purposes,
`permission must be sought from the Publisher (see
`above).
`
`Advertising representation
`To place orders for product advertisements, classifieds,
`or commercial reprints, contact Bill Scully, Cunningham
`Associates, 180 Old Tappan Road, Old Tappan, NJ
`07675. Telephone: 201-767-4170; fax: 201-767-8065:
`e-mail: bscully@cunnasso.com,
`
`Disclaimer
`
`The ideas and opinions expressed in Blood do not
`necessarily reflect those of The American Society of
`Hematology or the Editors of Blood. Publication of an
`advertisement or other product mention in Blood
`should not be construed as an endorsement of the
`product or the manufacturer’s claims. Readers are
`encouraged to contact
`the manufacturer with any
`questions about
`the features or
`limitations of the
`products mentioned. The American Society of Hema-
`tology does not assume any responsibility for any
`injury and/or damage to persons or property arising
`fromorrelated to any use ofthe material contained in
`this periodical. The reader is advised to check the
`appropriate medicalliterature and the product informa-
`tion currently provided by the manufacturer of each
`drug to be administered to verify the dosage,
`the
`method andduration of administration, or contraindi-
`cations. It is the responsibility of the eating physician or
`other health care professional,
`relying on his or her
`independent experience and knowledgeofthe patient, to
`determine drug dosages and the best treatment for the
`patient,
`
`Indexing & abstracting
`Blood is indexed and abstracted by Index Medicus,
`Excerpta Medica, Current Contents/Life Sciences, Cur-
`rent Contents/Clinical Medicine, Science Citation Index.
`SCISEARCH, Automatic Subject Citation Alert, ISI/
`BIOMED, andBIOSIS.
`
`Manuscript Submission: blood.manuscriptcentral.com.
`
`
`
`
`The American Society of Hematology
`1900 M Street, NW, Suite 200
`Washington, DC 20036
`
`This material was copied
`atthe NLM and maybe
`Subject US Copyright Laws.
`
`
`
`Celgene Ex. 2011, Page
`
`2.re,
`
`IPR2018-01714
`Celgene Ex. 2011, Page 2
`
`

`

`PROGRAM OF THE 45" ANNUAL MEETING OF
`
`THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY
`
`
`
`December 6-9, 2003
`
`San Diego, California
`
`
`
`Printed in the USA
`Copyright © 2003, The American Society ofHematology, Washington, D.C.
`
`This materia] was copied
`atthe NLAband may be
`Subject US Copyright Laws
`
`IPR2018-01714
`Celgene Ex. 2011, Page 3
`
`IPR2018-01714
`Celgene Ex. 2011, Page 3
`
`

`

`
`This material may beprotected by Copyrightlaw(Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`
`
`450a
`
`mAb b-B4,targeting CD 138, conjugated with DM! (B-B4-DM 1) againsta panel ofCD138+
`MM cells (MM.1S, OCI-My5 and MM.1R) and CD138- cells (the Waldenstrom’s
`macroglobulinemia cell line WSU-WM and the lymphoma line SUDHL4)in vitro.
`Following 48h oftreatment, B-B4-DM1 significantly decreased survival of CD138+ MM
`cells (IC50: 10-50 nM), assessed by viable cell number, MTT andproliferation assays,
`compared to CD138- WSU-WM or SUDHL4cells (1C50 not reached). In contrast,
`cytotoxicity of unconjugated DMI was equivalent in both CD138+ and CD138- cells
`(IC50 < 10 nM). The exposureof cells to equimolar concentrations ofunconjugated mAb B-
`B4alonefor 96 hdid not induce any cytotoxicity. We examinedtheeffects induced by B-B4,
`B-B4-DM1 and DMI onproliferation of OCI-My5 and SuDHL4cells adherent to bone
`marrowstromal cells (BMSCs). Unconjugated mAb did not induce any detectable effect,
`whereas B-B4-DM1 showedspecific activity against CD138+ cells. DMI alone induced
`toxicity in bothlines including BMSC. Wefurther evaluated activity of BB4-DM1 against
`CD138+ MMcells cultured with CD138- cell lines or peripheral blood cells, or against
`CD138+ primary MM cells adherentto patient BMSCs. B-B4-DM1 wasselectively able to
`deplete CD138+ tumorcells. Propidium iodide profiling confirmed that B-B4-DM1
`treatment of MM cellsresults in reduction of S-phase, G2 arrest, and apoptotic cell death.
`Finally, antitumoractivity of B-B4-DM1 wasevaluated in vivo in a murine MM xenograft
`model. Mice bearing OPM2 human MMcells were treated with B-B4-DM1 (75 pe/Kg or
`150 e/Kg), huC242-DM1 (150 Hg/Kg) unreactive with MM cells or vehicle only for a
`total of5 days.Inhibitionoftumor growth and improvementin median overall survival were
`observed in B-B4-DM I-treated mice (p<0.005) compared to control groups. In conclusion,
`our data demonstrate that B-B4-DM1 hasinvitro and in vivo anti-MM activity, suggesting
`its potential utility for treatment of MM.
`
`Poster Board #-Session: 754-I
`Abstract# 1642
`Revimid 25 mg (REV 25) x 20 Versus 50 mg (REV 50) x 10 q 28 Days
`with Bridging of 5 mg x 10 Versus 10 mg x 5 as Post-Transplant
`Salvage Therapyfor Multiple Myeloma (MM). Maurizio Zangari,!
`Bart Barlogie,' Joth Jacobson*,? Jerome B. Zeldis,> Elias J. Anaissie,!
`Raymond Thertulien,’ Athanasios Fassas,! Choon-Kee Lee,! John D.
`Shaughnessy, GuidoJ. Tricot.' ‘MyelomaInstitutefor Research and Therapy,
`University ofArkansas Jor Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA; ?Cancer
`Research AndBiostatistics, Seattle, WA, USA; 4Celgene Corporation, Warren,
`NJ, USA.
`58 patients with advanced and refractory MM wereenrolled in this randomized phase
`YW trial. Patient characteristics included age 2 60 in 54%, abnormal cytogenetics in 54%
`including del 13 in 33%; prior therapy > 5 years in 41%: prior autotransplants in 86%
`including tandem transplant in 48%; prior thalidomide exposure in 93% of patients.
`Cumulative responserates after monthly REVcycles are depicted accordingto the levels of
`M protein reduction specified, which were higher with REV 25 than REV 50 (Cycle 8 50%
`or greater response: 40% vs 15% p=0.041).
`
`Best % M-Protein Response by Cycle
`60.0%
`
`40.0%
`
`20.0%
`
`0.0%
`
`60.0%
`
`40.0%
`
`20.0%
`
`0.0%
`
`Doselimiting toxicity was cytopenia, especially thrombocytopenia with 55% ofpatients
`with pre-REVplatelet levels 2 100,000/UL developing grade > 2 thrombocytopenia (<
`50,000/1L) as opposed to 90% when pre-REVplatelet levels were < 100,000/1L (p=.001).
`
`THERAPEUTICS FOR PLASMA CELL DYSCRASIA
`
`REV wasnotassociated with sedative or neurotoxic side effects, Estimated 12-month
`EFSand OSratesare 30% and 61%,respectively, independentof cytogenetic abnormalities
`(CA) and REVdose.Serial gene expression profiling (GEP) studies prior to and 48 hr after
`REVrevealedsimilar but not identical GEP changesas observed after thalidomide. Clinical
`outcome data will be presented in the context of these GEP data.
`
`Abstract# 1643
`Poster Board #-Session: 755-1
`
`Primary Treatment of Mutiple Myeloma with Thalidomide,
`Vincristine, Liposomal Doxorubicin and Dexamethasone (T-VAD
`Doxil): A Phase II Multicenter Study. Konstantinos Zervas*, Melctios
`Athanasios Dimopoulos, Eleni Hatziharisi*, Athanasios Anagnostopoulos*,
`Maria Papaioannou*, Chrisanthi Mitsouli*, Panos Panagiotidis*, Ioannis
`Korantzis*, Michael Tzilianos*, Alice Maniatis*, Greek Myeloma Study
`Group, Athens, Greece.
`Introduction: We and others have shown that VAD-doxil is an outpatient regimen
`whichis effective in two-thirds of previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma.
`Recentdata also indicate that thalidomide with dexamethasoneis a highly active primary
`treatment for myelomapatients. Thus, we studied the efficacy and toxicity ofthe combination
`of VAD-doxil with thalidomide asinitial cytoreductive treatment in previously untreated
`patients with symptomatic myeloma.
`Patients and methods: The treatment consisted of vincristine 2mg IV, liposomal
`doxorubicin 40mg/m2 IV, administered as single dose on day 1, and dexamethasone 40mg
`PO daily for 4 days. Dexamethasone was also given on days 15-18 ofthe first cycle of
`treatment. The regimen was administered every 4 weeks for 4 courses. Thalidomide was
`given daily at a dose of 200 mgat bedtime. Responseto treatment was evaluated after 4
`cycles oftreatment, After completion of 4 cycles the patients were allowed to proceed to
`high dose chemotherapy orto receive two additional cycles of the same treatment.
`Results: Thirty-nine previously untreated patients were included in this phase II
`multicentertrial. Their median age was 68 years, median serum albumin 3.2g/dl and median
`serum b2 microglobulin 3.9mg/dlOnan intention-to-treat basis, 29 of the 39 patients (74%)
`respondedto treatment. Fourpatients (10%) achieved complete and 25 (64%)partial response.
`Three patients (8%) showed minorresponse and7 (18%) were rated as non responders. The
`time to response was short and at least 50% reduction of monoclonal protein was noted
`within 2 monthsoftreatment in 80% ofresponding patients, Major grade 3 or4 toxicities
`consisted of neutropenia (15%), thrombocytopenia (15%), deep vein thrombosis (10%),
`constipation (10%), skin rash (5%) and peripheral neuropathy (5%). Two patients (5%)
`experienced early death due to infection. Event-free and overall survival at 22 months were
`55% and 74% respectively.
`Conclusions: The combination of vincristine, liposomal doxorubicin, and
`dexamethasone (VAD doxil) with thalidomideis an effective and relatively well tolerated
`initial cytoreductive treatmentfor symptomatic patients with multiple myeloma.Prospective
`randomizedstudies are required in orderto assess the effect of this regimen on the long-term
`outcomeofthis discase.
`
`Abstract# 1644
`
`Poster Board #-Session: 756-1
`
`Doxorubicin and Dexamethasone (AD) Followed by Thalidomide
`and Dexamethasone (TD) as Initial Therapy for Symptomatic
`Patients with Multiple Myeloma. Raymond L. Comenzo,' Hani
`Hassoun,! Lilian Reich*,' Virginia Klimek,' Tarun Kewalramani,' Madhav
`Dhodapkar,' Lisa Drake*,' Cyrus Hedvat*,? Julie Teruya-Feldstein*,? Martin
`Fleisher*,? Dantel A. Filippa*,? Stephen D. Nimer.! ‘Medicine, Memorial
`Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; ?Pathology, Memorial
`Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; 3Clinical Laboratories,
`Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
`The addition of thalidomide to doxorubicin-containing regimens has becn associated
`with high response rates and a 25% incidence of venous thromboembolic complications in
`patients with multiple mycloma (NEJM 2001;344:1951-2; Blood 2001;98:1614-5; Blood
`2002; 100:1168-71). This risk has been increased in patients with myeloma exhibiting the
`11q+ chromosomeabnormality. To maintain the beneficial effects ofthese agents and minimize
`thromboembolic complications, we are examining the use of these agents in a temporally
`separated fashion for symptomatic stage [Land III patients. Doxorubicin and dexamethasone
`(AD; A=9mg/m*/day, Days 1-4; D=40mg/day, Days 1-4, 9-12, 17-20) are given for 3 months
`followed by thalidomide and dexamethasone (TD; T=200mg nightly; D=as above) for 2
`months with prophylactic antibiotics and daily aspirin (325g). At any point in therapy
`patients achieving complete responses (CR; immunofixation negative) are permitted to
`forgo further induction therapy and proceed with autologous stemcell transplantation
`(SCT). As of 7/03 we have enrolled 27patients (16M, 11W) with a median age of 58 years
`(range, 38-79); 10 had myeloma with plasmacytomasextending into soft tissues. Median B2
`microglobulin was 2.2mg/L (ND-10,5) and hemoglobin 11.3g/dl (8.3-14.3). Fluorescent
`in situ hybridization (FISII) studies of baseline bone marrows,searching for abnormalities
`of chromosomes [1, 13 and 14, are available for 23 patients, Abnormalities of 14 were
`detected in sevenpatients, of [1 in five patients, of 11, 13 and 14 in two, of 11 and 13 in one,
`and of {1 and 14 in one. Sevenpatients had no abnormalities of 11, 13 or 14 by FISH. Five
`patients are currently in treatment and two have been removed from study, one fora DVTthat
`occurred during cycle 5 and the other for a myocardialinfarction after cycle 1. Two patients
`developed DVT onorjust after therapy with thalidomide (2/21; 10%; 1/2 with I1q+),
`which scemsto be less than the incidence of DVT (6/21; 29%; 4/6 with I1q+) noted in
`initial versions of this trial incorporating thalidomide and doxorubicin together in each
`cycle. Twenty patients are currently evaluable for response. Nineteen have responded to
`therapy (95%), including 5 complete responses (25%), 6 very good partial responses (30%)
`and 8 partial responses (40%), Onepatient had stable disease (5%). Two patients achieved
`CRafter 3 cycles of AD and underwent SCT,and 16 patientsi? tofo have undergone SCT
`
`Overall Survival by Cogenetice: UARK 200144
`00%
`
`aS
`
`on
`
`htt,'
`
`ne
`
`0%
`WeMorth
`
` Extimae
`Deahy {N
`—a
`8/32
`72% GSe)
`
`—~No CA
`112 GO% (58H)
`Logark Povale = 57
`
`9
`2
`6
`9
`2
`Mocthe trem Stat d Pratoool Therapy
`
`This material was copied
`atthe NLM and may be
`Subject US Copyright Laws
`
`IPR2018-01714
`Celgene Ex. 2011, Page 4
`
`Event—Free Survival by Cytogenetics: UARK 2001—44
`1%
`TeeMorah,
`Evertu/N Eamae
`S27 RM (1259)
`No CA
`227m He 1547
`mh
`Logrank Pewaive = 49
`
`
`
`0%
`
`
`
`OO
`
`0%
`
`2%
`
`0%
`
`2
`9
`8
`3
`Morths from Start od Protocol Therapy
`
`8
`
`IPR2018-01714
`Celgene Ex. 2011, Page 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket