throbber
November20, 2001
`
`HEALTH SCIENCES
`LIBRARIES
`
`VOLUME 98
`
`Dt) aS ae
`
`NOVEMBER 16, 2001
`
`a nO) ea
`
`American Society of
`
`Hematology
`
`Forty-third annual
`
`Celgene Ex. 2010, Page 1
`
`meeting program
`and abstracts
`
`OT Totti ol] a eo ea
`
`Orlando, Florida
`
`PR2018-01/14
`
`IPR2018-01714
`Celgene Ex. 2010, Page 1
`
`

`

`
`
`PROGRAM OFTHE 43RD ANNUAL MEETING OF
`
`THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY
`
`December 7-11, 2001
`
`Orlando, Florida
`
`Printed in the USA
`Copyright© 2001, The American Society of Hematology, Washington, D.C.
`
`IPR2018-0171
`Celgene Ex. 2010, Page 2
`
`IPR2018-01714
`Celgene Ex. 2010, Page 2
`
`

`

`evaluable pts (63%) and <25% in an additional 3 pts. Conclusion: This study shows that
`CC-5013 has anti-tumoractivity and acceptable toxicity in pts with relapsed and refractory
`MM,and provides the framework for future phase II trials in MM.
`
`Abstract# 3226
`
`775a
`
`MYELOMA THERAPIES
`
`et# 3224
`
`optotic Signaling Induced by Immunomodulatory Thalidomide
`ogs (Imids) in Human Multiple Myeloma Cells: Therapeutic
`ications. Nicholas Mitsiades*,' Constantine S. Mitsiades*,' Vassiliki
`i*,? Masaharu Akiyama*,' Yu-Tzu Tai*,' Boris K. Lin*,' Toshiaki
`yashi*,' Lawrence Catley*,' Teru Hideshima*,' Dharminder Chauhan*,'
`P. Treon*,' Kenneth C. Anderson.' ‘Department of Adult Oncology,
`gna Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; *Massachusetis Eye and Ear
`rmary, Boston, MA.
`“Thalidomide (Thal) achieves responses even in the setting ofrefractory multiple myeloma
`MM). Although increased angiogenesis in MM bone marrow and the anti-angiogenic
`ct ofThal formed the empiric basis for its use in MM,Thaland its immunomodulatory
`gs
`(IMiDs) mayalso inhibit the production of cytokines in the bone marrow and
`ite NK cell anti-MM immunity. Our prior studies have also demonstrated that IMiD1
`Warren, NJ) is several-fold more potent than Thal in inhibiting the growth ofMM
`and directly induces apoptosis in the MM.1S MM cellline. We therefore investigated
`er the mechanism ofits pro-apoptotic activity, in particular the role ofcaspases and the
`urvival transcription factor NF-kB. Using a colorimetric activity assay, we found that
`MiD1 induced caspase-8, but not caspase-9,activity in MM.1S cells. Moreover,the caspase-
`ecific inhibitor IETD-FMK,but not the caspase 9 inhibitor LEHD-FMK,protected
`1S cells from IMiD1-induced cell death, Caspase-8 is a key mediator ofdeath receptor-
`ted apoptosis and can be inhibited by the anti-apoptotic proteins cLAP2 and FLIP.
`found that IMiD1 sensitized MM.1S cells to low concentrations of Fas-crosslinking Ab
`Hi, and downregulated clAP2 and FLIP, but not Bel-2, protein expression. The
`itutive activity of NF-KB, a pro-survival transcription factor that upregulates clAP2
`FLIP expression in various models, was also decreased upon treatment with IMiD1, as
`the expression of another NF-kB target gene, the adhesion molecule ICAM-1. IMiD1
`9 blocked the stimulatory effect of Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF)-1 on NF-KBactivity
`prar2 and FLIP protein levels. Importantly, IMiD1 potentiated the anti-MMactivity
`e)
`asone
`and the proteasome inhibitor PS341 (Millennium, Cambridge, MA). These
`dies both delineate the mechanisms ofaction of IMiD1 against MMcellsin vitro and form
`basis for clinical trials of these agents, alone and coupled with conventional and other
`ovel therapies, to improve outcome in MM.
`
`problems such as thromboembolism and syncope. Neurologic toxicity is minimal.
`
`Results of Phase I Study of CC-5013 for the Treatment of Multiple
`Myeloma
`(MM) Patients Who Relapse after High Dose
`Chemotherapy (HDCT). Maurizio Zangari,' Guido Tricot,' Jerome Zeldis,’
`Paul Eddlemon*,' Fariba Saghafifar*,' Bart Barlogie.' ‘Myeloma and
`Transplantation Research Center, University of Arkansas for Medical
`Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA; *Celgene, Warren, NJ, USA.
`Despite the 40%-50 complete response rate and increased survival achieved by high
`dose chemotherapy, there is a clear need to further improve treatment outcome in MM. We
`report results from a single center, open label, escalating dose, phase I-study of the
`thalidomide derivative CC-5013. Four different daily dose levels (5/10/25/50 mg) were
`tested. All patients were treated for four weeks. In the absence of dose-limiting toxicity
`(DLT)or evidence of disease progression (PD), patients could be entered on an extension
`study, which allowed further dose escalations. The maximum dose allowedin this study
`was 50 mg/day. If at any level one ofthe first 3 patients experienced DLT, the cohort was
`expanded to 6 patients; if 2 patients experienced DTL in the same cohort, no further dose
`escalation was allowed. Fifteen patients were enrolled; 6 were males. Median age was 62
`years (43-73); median -2 microglobulin was 2.6 mg/l (1.4-6.4), median CRP 0.24 mg/l (.09
`to 3.7). Ten had chromosome 13 abnormalities on cytogenetic analysis. All patients had
`chemorefractory disease having relapsed after at least one HDCT (range | to 3) with a
`median of 10 prior cycles of chemotherapy (range 3 to 80). No responses were seen at the
`Sand 10 mg level. However,2 of the 3 patients, whostarted at 10 mg and were subsequently
`escalated on the extension study to 25 and 50 mg,respectively, achieved a > 50%paraprotein
`response with a decrease in BM plasmacytosis of 50%in one patient, while the other
`continued to show < 5% bone marrow plasma cells. One patient at the 25 mg level had stable
`paraprotein and bone marrow plasmacytosis for 5 months, while discontinuation of therapy
`was required in 2 patients (one syncope; one PD), Six patients started at 50 mg/day; 3 are’
`still on study, one with stable, one with > 25% and one with> 50 % in both paraprotein level
`and bone marrow plasmacytosis; 2 patients experienced DLT (thromboembolism and
`profound thrombocytopenia) and one PD. Six patients continue on this study after 2, 2, 4,
`5, 6 and 6 months, five at 50 mg/day and one at 25 mg/day dose. Five ofthese patients have
`experienced a > 50% drop in platelet count. The initial platelet count in these 5 patients was
`> 140,000/11 and their bone marrow biopsy cellularity > 30%. We conclude that 20% of
`these heavily pretreated MM_ patients showed a > 50% paraprotein reduction with a
`concomitant bone marrow response. Responses were only observed at the 25 and 50 mg
`dose. However, the
`thalidomide derivative appears to also cause significant
`myelosuppression even in patients with adequate platelet counts and bone marrow
`cellularity before the start of treatment. It also has the potential to cause cardiovascular
`
`Abstract# 3227
`
`Abstract# 3225
`Phase 1 Study of Oral CC5013, an Immunomodulatory
`thalidomide (Thal) Derivative, in Patients with Relapsed and
`efractory Multiple Myeloma
`(MM). P.G. Richardson,' R.L.
`hlossman,' T. Hideshima,' F. Davies,' R. LeBlanc,' L. Catley,' D. Doss*,'
`K.A. Kelly*,' M. McKenney*,' J. Mechlowicz*,' A. Freeman*,' R.
`Deocampo*,' R. Rich*,' J. Ryoo*,' D. Chauhan,' N. Munshi,' E. Weller*,'
`S$. Thomas*,? J. Zeldis,? K.C. Anderson.' ‘Dana-Farber Cancer Institute,
`oston, MA, USA; *Celgene Inc., Warren, NJ, USA.
`_
`Introduction: Thalidomide (thal) has a broad spectrum ofbiologic effects and significant
`linical activity against multiple myeloma (MM). CC-5013, a small molecule derivative of
`Single Subcutaneous Dose of an Osteoprotegerin (OPG)
`A
`and a memberof the immunomodulatory drug (IMiD)class, is more potentthan thal in
`Construct
`(AMGN-0007)
`Causes a Profound and Sustained
`mediating direct, cytokine-related and immunomodulatory effects against haoman MM cell
`Decrease of Bone Resorption Comparable to Standard Intravenous
`es and patient (pt) derived cells in vitro. Animal studies of CC-5013 have shown anti-
`Bisphosphonate in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. P. Greipp,' T.
`activity and anti-angiogenic effects, with minimal toxicity. Moreover, this agent has
`Facon,’? C.D. Williams,’ A. Lipton,* X. Mariette*,’ J.-P. Fermand,® J.
`favorable safety profile in normal human volunteers. Methods: A phase I study has been
`Berenson,’ J.-L. Harousseau,* R. Alexanian,? A. Nakanishi*,'® D.
`erformed in pts with refractory or relapsed MM to identify the maximum tolerated dose and
`Holloway*,'® C.R. Dunstan*,' P.J. Bekker*.'° ‘Mayo Clinic, Rochester,
`evaluate the safety ofCC-5013 given orally for up to 4 weeks at 5 mg/day(d), 10 mg/d,
`25 mg/d and 50 mg/d. Secondary objectives included evaluation of response to CC-5013,
`MN; ?CHUdeLille, Lille, France; *Christie Hospital, Manchester, United
`as well as pharmacokinetics and identification of surrogate markers to aid in defining
`Kingdom; *Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; *CHU de Bicetre, Paris,
`mechanisms of action. Pts tolerating drug and without progression were permitted to
`France; °Hopital Saint-Louis, Paris, France; "Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Los
`ontinue
`on therapy beyond 28das part ofan extension phase for up to | year. Results: 26
`Angeles, CA; ‘Hopital Hotel Dieu, Nantes, France; "MD Anderson Med Ctr,
`(median age 57y, range 40-70y) have been enrolled; 16 had undergone prior autologous
`Houston, TX;
`'“Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA.
`stem cell transplantation and 16 had received priorthal, with a median of3 prior regimens
`Bonedestruction causes significant morbidity in most patients with multiple myeloma
`range
`2-6). All pts had relapsed MMand 18 were refractory to salvage therapy. 2 pts were
`(MM). Cytokines released during bone destruction promote myclomacell proliferation and
`oved from study on the first day oftreatment duc to rapid disease progression with renal
`survival. OPG is a potentinhibitor ofosteoclastic bone destruction. A randomized, double-
`dysfunction
`that rendered them ineligible. The first group of 3 pts were treated for 28 d at
`blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, single-dose, dose escalation study is being
`ng/d without any dose limiting toxicity (DLT). The second cohort of 3 pts commenced
`conducted to determine the safety and effect on bone resorption of AMGN-0007 in MM
`ipy
`at 10 mg/d.
`In | pt, DLT was encountered with grade (G) 2 fever as well as G3
`patients with radiological confirmed lytic bone lesions. Patients were randomized (3:1
`copenia and neutropenia, resulting in removal from study before d 28. 2 pts tolerated
`ratio) to receive a single dose of either AMGN-0007 SC or pamidronate (PAM; 90 mg I'V)
`and 3 additional pts were treated at 10 mg/d with no attributable toxicity within the
`and were followed for 57 days. Medications or other diseases affecting bone metabolism
`pst 28d. In the third cohort of 3 pts at 25mg/d, drug was well tolerated within the first 28d
`and chemotherapy within 28 days of dosing were exclusion criteria. Biological activity of
`G3 and G4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia occurred during the second month,
`AMGN-0007 was assessed by measurementof the surrogate marker of bone resorption,
`urinary N-telopeptide ofcite (NTX). Preliminary data indicate that SC AMGN-0007
`ulting in 2 pts being removed from study. In the fourth cohort at 50mg/d, the first 3. pts
`ted treatment without DLTin the first 28d, but subsequent G3 myelosuppression in
`caused a rapid, sustained dose-dependent decrease in NTX/creatinine levels (nmol Bone
`extension phase prompted dose reduction and GCSF support. To date, a further 8 pts
`Collagen Equivalents/mmol creatinine). No patients dropped out due to adverse events.
`ve been treated at 50mg/d to better define toxicity and outcome. No DLT has been
`Twopatients in the 1.0 mg/kg AMGN-0007 group had albumin-adjusted serum calcium
`ountered within the first 28d, and no significant somnolence, constipation or neuropathy
`levels of 7.4 and 7.5 mg/dL at day 8, but there were no clinical sequelae.
`In conclusion, a
`been seen in any cohort. Median duration oftherapy is currently 2 months [range | week
`single SC dose of AMGN-0007 suppressed bone resorption as indicated by a rapid,
`7months] and 16 pts continue on treatment. Maximalparaprotein reductions seen during
`sustained, and profound decrease of urinary NTX/creatinine in MM patients. Changes were
`erapy
`in pts who have received 2 28d of treatment are summarized below:
`comparable to those with PAM. AMGN-0007 was well tolerated.
`e{mg)
`pts [n]
`< 25% 225%<50%
`250% progression
`
`
`
`UrinaryNTX/CreatininelevelsafterAMGN-0007orPAM
`3
`-
`2
`1
`-
`Study Drug
`5
`-
`-
`1
`4
`AMGN-0007
`3
`1
`2
`-
`-
`SC (mg/kg)
`8g
`2
`3
`3
`-
`50
`0.1 (n=3)
`(19)
`(3)
`a
`(5)
`(4)
`(subtotals)
`0.3 (n=4)
`Best responses in paraprotein with a reduction of 2 25% have been seen in 12 of 19
`1.0 (n=7)
`3.0 (n=6)
`PAM 90 mg
`IV(n=6)
`
`Baseline NTX; Mean (SD)
`Day 0
`46.3 (33.1)
`27.3 (16.2)
`27.8 (11.7)
`27.8 (17.2)
`24.8 (11.3)
`
`Percent Change from Baseline NT'X; Mean (SE)
`Day 1
`Day 8
`Day 29
`-11.7 (20.2)
`-20.5 (20.3)
`-2.8 (6.4)
`-28.6 (5.3)
`-53.7 (11.9)
`~44.8 (9.9)
`~37.9 (14.2)
`~56.1 (7.0)
`-58.8 (6.6)
`-32.5 (12.6)
`~46.4 (14.7)
`-34,7 (16.9)
`-36.9 (5.7)
`53.9 (8.4)
`32.4 (9.7)
`
`IPR2018-01714
`Celgene Ex. 2010, Page 3
`
`IPR2018-01714
`Celgene Ex. 2010, Page 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket