throbber
19 April 1969
`
`MepieneOURNAL
`
`163
`
`Current Practice
`
`
`
`Management of Multiple Myeloma
`
`J. S. MALPAS,* D-PHIL., M.R.C.P.
`
`British Medical Journal, 1969, 2, 163-165
`
`Considerable progress has been made in the therapy of multiple
`myeloma, and it is now possible not only to alleviate symptoms
`but to prolong survival. Patients may be enabled to resume
`full activity—or at
`least
`to lead a limited but comfortable
`existence.
`
`Multiple myeloma is a malignant disease of plasma cells,
`occurring usually in middle-aged and elderly people, and
`characterized by a proliferation of plasma cells throughout the
`bone marrow and lymphoreticular tissue. Occasionally it may
`start as an isolated tumour mass, but generalization of the
`disease inevitably occurs in time. When the disease progresses
`bone marrow failure, bone destruction, increased susceptibility
`to infection, and metabolic disturbances such as hypercalcaemia,
`hyperuricaemia, and uraemia may arise as complications. The
`disease is invariably fatal.
`The diagnosis of multiple myeloma and the clinical and
`pathological
`features of
`the disease have been extensively
`reviewed,!~* and will not be considered in detail. The diag-
`nosis is based on the demonstration on serum electrophoresis
`of an homogeneous band of protein, the so-called paraprotein
`or “M” component, or the presence of plasmacytosis with
`bone destruction apparent on a radiological survey of the skele-
`ton, or the presence of a solitary tumour composed of myeloma
`tissue.
`Usually there is no difficulty in distinguishing the
`abnormal plasma cells seen in myelomatissue, but occasionally
`difficulty can be experienced, and care must then be taken that
`the plasmacytosis is not the result of drug sensitivities, diseases
`of collagen tissue, chronic infection, cirrhosis of the liver, or
`malignant disease such as carcinomatosis or Hodgkin’s disease.
`In the same way homogeneous bands or “M” components on
`serum electrophoresis do not necessarily denote myeloma:
`they
`may be seen in macroglobulinaemia or other more benign
`immunoglobulin disorders.
`
`Clinical Pathology
`
`Tests carried out on the serum and urine are an essential part
`of diagnosis, and they may also provide evidence which will be
`of value in management and prognosis.
`Serum and Urinary Proteins—Gitlin’ and Cohen® have
`reviewed the terminology of the immunoglobulins. Most para-
`proteins found in multiple myelomaare related to the yG and
`yA immunoglobulins. More rarely paraproteins related to
`yM and yD immunoglobulins are found, and in about 6%
`of a large series Hobbs’ found that the myeloma was producing
`only Bence Jones protein (B.J.P.)—that
`is,
`the light chain
`moiety of the immunoglobulins. The prognosis for patients
`producing yG and yA paraproteins does not seem to differ.
`Though very few cases of yD paraproteins have been recorded
`their survival appears to be short.
`
`* Senior Lecturer in Medicine, Medical Unit, St. Bartholomew’s Hospi-
`tal, dpondon E.C.1 ; Consultant Physician, St. Leonard’s Hospital,
`ondon
`N.1,
`
`Certain complications appear to be more common in the
`presence of certain paraproteins. Thus yG myelomais asso-
`ciated with a higher
`incidence of
`infection and with less
`frequent occurrence of hypercalcaemia.®
`The presence of Bence Jones protein is of considerable prog-
`nostic importance.
`The light chain moieties which form
`B.J.P. are of two types, kappa (x) or lambda (A) chains. Hobbs®
`investigated a series of patients with paraproteinaemia and
`showed that the presence of B.J.P. in excess of 1 mg./100 ml.
`in the urine indicated a bad prognosis. Earlier, Walden-
`str6m!® 12 had shown that the occurrence of B.J.P.
`together
`with a rising level of paraprotein in the serum was also a bad
`augury.
`The presence of B.J.P. is closely correlated with renal failure
`and with anaemia, both of which have an adverse effect on
`survival. 12 Bergsagel, Migliore, and Griffith'* reported a
`higher incidence of response to therapy in patients producing
`B.J.P. of type «x. Caggiano, Cuttner, and Solomon‘ were unable
`to confirm this, but further evidence is now available from the
`M.R.C.trial in which patients producing x light chains appear
`to have a somewhat better prognosis.‘4
`In a long-term study
`by the South-west Cancer Chemotherapy Group patients pro-
`ducing » chains have a higher incidence of renal failure, a
`poorer response to therapy, and a shorter survival.’*
`Renal Function.—Between a third and a half of the patients
`who die from multiple myeloma do so as a consequence of
`renal failure. Many mechanisms contribute to the failure, in-
`cluding pyelonephritis, nephrocalcinosis,
`intracellular tubular
`damage, and amyloidosis. Once renal failure has begun in
`myeloma current forms of therapy do not appear to be able to
`arrest it. A patient with a blood urea of over 80 mg./100 ml.
`has a poor prognosis. The median survival of patients in this
`group is about eight weeks.
`This compares with a median
`survival of over three years for the group with blood ureas of
`less than 80 mg./100 ml.®
`An elevated level of serum calcium has been noted in a fifth
`to a half of patients when they first presented.
`Though
`increased bone resorption is the main factor responsible, wide-
`spread bony erosions are not always present.
`The serum
`alkaline phosphatase is usually not raised in multiple myeloma.
`It does not appear
`that hypercalcaemia has any effect on
`prognosis.
`In common with many malignant processes hyperuri-
`caemia and secondary gout may be associated with multiple
`myeloma.
`frequently complicates
`Haematological Studies——Anaemia
`the disease. When the anaemia is severe and requires frequent
`blood transfusion for its correction the patient’s prognosis is
`poor. The mechanism for the production of anaemia in mye-
`loma is complex.
`In a comprehensive investigation Cline and
`Berlin’* showed that anaemia could be due to bone marrow
`failure, shortening of the red cell survival, and iron deficiency.
`The latter usually resulted from recurrent bleeding episodes
`associated with thrombocytopaenia, and was usually seen in
`the later stages. Megaloblastic changes have been found on
`
`ALVOGEN, Exh. 1046, p. 0001
`
`ALVOGEN, Exh. 1046, p. 0001
`
`

`

`164
`
`19 April 1969
`
`Multiple Myeloma—Malpas
`
`BRITISH
`MEDICAL JouRNAL
`
`bone marrow examination by a number of investigators. Thirty-
`two patients with myeloma were studied by Hoffbrand, Hobbs,
`Kremenchuzky, and Mollin,!’ and intermediate megaloblastic
`changes were noted in six.
`These changes were mainly due
`to folic acid deficiency. Addisonian pernicious anaemia is rare
`in myeloma ; the low vitamin B,, levels that have been recorded
`were related to a reduction in the normal circulating immuno-
`globulin levels.
`
`Treatment
`
`Waldenstrém!* has outlined the basic principles of therapy
`in myeloma. Firstly, the treatment of a generalized malignant
`disease must be systemic and should not be directed against
`local lesions.
`Secondly, he has drawn an analogy between the
`disease and an infection with a microorganism. The cytostatic
`drug,
`like an antibiotic, must be given initially in high con-
`centration and then a lower dose must be given continuously.
`The specific chemotherapy available and its administration will
`be discussed in detail
`later.
`Supportive care to prevent or
`relieve complications
`such as
`fractures,
`infections, hyper-
`calcaemia, hyperuricaemia, renal failure, and hyperviscosity will
`be dealt with first.
`
`Supportive Therapy
`
`Skeletal pain is often responsible for the patient leading a
`limited existence. Deep x-ray therapy of local skeletal deposits
`is often of great benefit.
`Though the rapid development of
`chemotherapy has done much to make long-term control of
`skeletal pain easier, deep x-ray therapy is very effective when
`pain originates from a myelomatous deposit.
`It has the great
`advantage of providing rapid relief. Relief is usually so com-
`plete that if pain persists it may be advisable to seek some other
`cause for its occurrence, such as an unrecognized pathological
`fracture. Deep x-ray therapy may also be particularly useful
`when a deposit within the spinal theca threatens damage to the
`spinal cord.
`Immobilization of pathological fractures and spinal support
`by corsets and steel braces may bring relief of pain. The use
`of sodium fluoride to produce subacute fluorosis with hardening
`of the skeleton is not justifiable because of the risk of retinal
`damage.?®
`Infections are frequent in myeloma, and chest infections seem
`particularly common.
`They require urgent and adequate
`therapy.
`Because of
`the reduction in the level of normal
`immunoglobulin that
`is seen as myeloma progresses,’
`these
`patients often show poor resistance to infection, but prophy-
`lactic
`administration
`of
`gammaglobulin
`seems
`to
`be
`disappointing.
`Slight hypercalcaemia may be treated by rehydration and
`specific chemotherapy. When hypercalcaemia is more pro-
`nounced and symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, or mental
`disturbances supervene,
`immediate administration of cortico-
`steroids is
`imperative.
`A dramatic improvement
`is usually
`seen,
`
`Hyperuricaemia may occur in the absence of renal failure.
`Treatment with allopurinol has been reported and is effective.”°
`The renal failure of myeloma is usually chronic and irrever-
`sible. Acute renal failure may also occur. This may happen
`spontaneously or follow periods of vomiting with consequent
`dehydration. Vomiting may be induced by specific therapy
`with urethane or melphelan.
`There are a number of reports of acute renal failure after
`pyelography. This may occur with recently introduced con-
`trast media as well as with established media.?} Renal failure
`occurs too frequently to be a coincidence, butit is still a rela-
`tively rare occurrence. Vix?* carried out 52 intravenous pyelo-
`
`gramsin 40 patients without any evidence of renal deterioration,
`even in those already suffering from chronic renal
`failure.
`Pyelography should nevertheless not be carried out without a
`good indication, and if an intravenous pyelogram is necessary
`it is wise to omit the period of dehydration that is part of the
`routine preparation.
`A marked increase in the viscosity of serum may be seen occa-
`sionally in patients with yG myeloma. Hyperviscosity may
`give rise to mental symptomsvery similar to those observed in
`hypercalcaemia, and,
`in addition, a retinopathy,
`recurrent
`bleeding, cardiac failure, and lassitude may occur.
`Smith,
`Kochwa, and Wasserman?’ were able to demonstrate the
`formation of aggregates of yG in vivo. As retinal damage
`may rapidly progress to blindness plasmaphoresis must be
`carried out urgently to reduce the circulating protein. Plasma-
`phoresis must be followed by specific chemotherapy.
`There are a number of causes for the bleeding diathesis seen
`in some patients with myeloma.
`Thrombocytopenia may
`result from bone marrow failure or from treatment with cyto-
`toxic agents. The platelets may become coated with abnormal
`protein,?4 and rarely a circulating anticoagulant may cause
`bleeding.
`Myeloma is a disease of late middle age, so that the manage-
`ment of pregnancy occurring with this condition is uncommon,
`Occasionally, however, myeloma occurs in children or young
`adults, and Kosova and Schwartz?> reported the case of a 35-
`year-old woman with myeloma who, following a remission in-
`duced with deep x-ray and urethane, had a normal pregnancy
`and delivery. Pregnancy did not seem to cause a deterioration
`of her condition.
`
`Specific Therapy
`
`Many drugs have been used in the treatment of myeloma.
`Some drugs such as stilbamidine, methotrexate, vinblastine, and
`hydroxyurea have been shown to be ineffective. Others, like
`urethane and corticosteroids, may produce both subjective and
`objective improvement, but have not been shown to increase
`the length of survival.
`In a study by Holland ef a/.!? urethane
`was shown to be of no greater benefit than a placebo in increas-
`ing survival, and patients treated with it survived for a shorter
`period than those treated with supportive therapy only.
`After extensive trials?! ** cyclophosphamide and melphalan
`have been shown to be effective in treatment and to produce
`a definite increase in survival.
`It is difficult to compare the
`length of survival seen in recent series of patients treated with
`these alkylating agents with the series reported more than a
`decade ago.
`Someof the early series reported a median survival
`of only three months ; Osgood?’ showed in 1960 that
`the
`median survival for patients treated with steroids, radioactive
`phosphorus, and urethane was 20 months. This improvement
`was probably related, however, to the earlier recognition of the
`disease in the later series.
`
`Korst e¢ al.2* reported a series of 165 patients treated with
`cyclophosphamide.
`The median survival of this group was
`32 months, compared with 9 months in an ancillary group
`treated without cyclophosphamide.
`In 82 patients treated with
`melphalan over a seven-year period Alexanian et al.*° showed
`a median survival time of 34 months. Furthermore those who
`responded to melphalan lived some 30 months longer than a
`group of non-responders.
`There seems to be no doubt that
`cyclophosphamide and melphalan do prolong survival.
`In
`the M.R.C.
`trial? comparing them no significant difference
`between them was shown.
`
`Dosage and Toxic Side-effects
`Cyclophosphar:ide
`
`It can be given
`This alkylating agent is activated in vivo.
`orally or intravenously, but when treating myeloma the oral
`
`ALVOGEN, Exh. 1046, p. 0002
`
`ALVOGEN, Exh. 1046, p. 0002
`
`

`

`19 April 1969
`
`Multiple Myeloma—Malpas
`
`Mepiene3ouRNAL
`
`165
`
`It produces improvement in about
`route is usually preferred.
`a third of patients treated? The dose is 2 mg./kg./day, but
`the daily dosage is varied to avoid bone marrow suppression.
`Besides marrow toxicity cyclophosphamide can cause alopecia
`and haemorrhagic cystitis.
`Continued chemotherapy should
`be attempted, and an examination of the white cell count and
`platelet count should be carried out every three to four weeks.
`
`Melphalan
`
`Phenylalanine mustard can also be given orally. When
`first introduced for the treatment of myeloma it was suggested
`that a dose of 0-15 mg./kg./day should be given for a week
`followed by a period in which the bone marrow recovered.
`Maintenance therapy was then continued with doses of 0-05
`mg./kg./day. Long-term therapy was carried on with doses
`not greater
`than 0-06 mg./kg./day.1°7°°°
`Toxic effects
`include nausea, vomiting, ulceration of
`the mouth, gastro-
`intestinal haemorrhage, and bone marrow depression. Mel-
`phalan should be given with great care in the presence of renal
`failure.
`
`The number of patients who show a response to either cyclo-
`phosphamide or melphalanis still disappointingly low. Efforts
`have been made therefore to improve the remission rate and
`prolong survival by altering the regimens of administration or
`using combination chemotherapy with corticosteroids as well
`as cytostatic drugs. Alexanian et al.1° have compared four
`treatment regimens, daily melphalan 0-025 mg./kg./day, inter-
`mittent melphalan ‘0-25 mg./kg./day for four days followed
`by an interval of six weeks, intermittent melphalan with predni-
`solone
`1:0 mg./kg. on alternate days,
`and intermittent
`melphalan with prednisolone 2:0 mg./kg./day on the days
`when melphalan is being administered.
`They found that
`objective responses to melphalan occurred more often when it
`was given intermittently, and that there was no indication of
`increased toxicity.
`The addition of prednisolone to the regimen resulted in an
`enhanced response, with some 70% of the patients responding,
`and the median survival of the group treated with melphalan
`and prednisolone was six months longer than the group treated
`with melphalan alone.
`It was also evident that some patients
`
`who had shown no signs of responding to melphalan would
`do so when prednisolone was added.
`Recent advances such as these in the therapy of myeloma
`may now perhaps form the basis for a more generally optimistic
`outlook in this condition.
`
`I am grateful to Professor Raymond Alexanian and to Dr. J. R.
`Hobbs for kindly allowing me to quote from unpublished data.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`w
`
`J.,
`
`aceswe
`
`a
`

`
`Osserman, E. F., and Takatsuki, K., Medicine (Baltimore), 1963, 42,
`357
`Drivsholm, A., Acta Medica Scandinavica, 1964, 176, 509.
`Bergsage!l, D. E., Griffith, K. M., Haut, A., and Stuckey, W.
`Advances in Cancer Research, 1967, 10, 311.
`Caggiano, V., Cuttner, J., and Solomon, A., Blood, 1967, 30, 265.
`Gitlin, D., Annual Review of Medicine, 1966, 17, 1.
`Cohen, S., British Journal of Haematology, 1968, 15, 211.
`Hobbs, J. R., Scientific Basis of Medicine Annual Reviews, 1966,
`. 106.
`Galton, D. A. G., and Peto, R., British Journal of Haematology, 1968,
`» 319.
`Hobbs, J. R., British Medical Journal, 1967, 3, 699.
`1° Waldenstrém, J., Acta Medica Scandinavica, 1964, 176, 345.
`11 Waldenstrém, J., British Medical Journal, 1964, 1, 859,
`.
`12 Holland, J. F., et al., Blood, 1966, 27, 328.
`13 Bergsagel, D. E., Migliore, P. J., and Griffith, K. M., Science, 1965,
`3
`.
`48, 376
`14 Hobbs, J. R., British Journal of Haematology, 1969, in press.
`15 Alexanian, R., et al., Journal of
`the American Medical Association,
`1969, in press.
`.
`.
`16 Cline, M. J., and Berlin, N. I., American Fournal of Medicine, 1962,
`33, 510.
`17 Hoffbrand, A. V., Hobbs, J. R., Kremenchuzky, S., and Mollin, D. L.,
`Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1967, 20, 699.
`.
`18 Waldenstrém, J., British Fournal of Haematology, 1968, 15, 217.
`19 British Medical Fournal, 1967, 2, 128.
`»” Rundles, R. W., Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1966, 25, 615.
`21 Gross, M., McDonald, H. M., and Waterhouse, K., Radiology, 1968,
`90, 780.
`22 Vix, V. A., Radiology, 1966, 87, 896.
`33 Smith, E., Kochwa, S., and Wasserman, L. R., American Fournal of
`Medicine, 1965, 39, 35.
`24 Vigliano, E. M., and Horowitz, H. I., Blood, 1967, 29, 823.
`25 Kosova, L. A., and Schwartz, S. O., Blood, 1966,28, 102.
`26 Speed, D. E., Galton, D. A. G., and Swan, A., British Medical Fournal,
`1964, 1, 1664.
`27 Osgood, E. E., Cancer Chemotherapy Reports, 1960, 9, 1.
`*§ Korst, D. R., Clifford, G. O., Fowler, W. M., Louis, J., Will, J., and
`Wilson, H. E., Journal of the American Medical Association, 1964,
`189, 758.
`29 Alexanian, R., Bergsagel, D. E., Migliore, P. J., Vaughn, W. K., and
`Howe, C. D., Blood, 1968, 31, 1.
`5° Hoogstraten, B., et al., Blood, 1967, 30, 74.
`
`TODAY’S DRUGS
`
`With the help of expert contributors we print in this section
`notes on drugs in common use.
`
`Androgens and Anabolic Steroids
`Several androgenic steroid hormones
`are secreted by the
`adrenal cortex and the testis ; the most powerful is testosterone.
`. The action of these hormones is most clearly seen in the changes
`that occur in boys at puberty. Under the stimulus of gonado-
`trophin secreted by the pituitary gland testosterone and other
`androgenic steroids are secreted in significant amounts for the
`first time. These hormones are responsible for changes in the
`larynx causing deepening of
`the voice,
`for growth of
`the
`external genitalia and the prostate, and for the appearance of
`body hair with the typical male distribution. They also pro-
`duce pronounced retention of nitrogen and the build-up of
`body protein which results in development of the musculature
`and also accounts for, at least in part, the spurt in growth at
`puberty.
`As well
`as
`stimulating growth the androgenic
`
`hormones cause maturation of the bones and, eventually, fusion
`of the epiphyses, which brings growth to a halt.
`It is the
`property of these hormones to produce nitrogen retention and
`encourage protein anabolism which has led to a large scale
`attempt
`to develop compounds that will retain these actions
`but not have the masculinizing effects. These anabolic steroids
`are tested by bioassays which separate the effect upon nitrogen
`metabolism from the androgenic effects. Many such com-
`pounds have now been produced in which the nitrogen retain-
`ing properties predominate over the androgenic effects. None,
`however, has yet been shown to be entirely free of androgenic
`actions when tested in man.
`
`Hypogonadism
`
`The most clear-cut indication for the use. of testosterone is
`as replacement therapy in patients with hypogonadism. This
`raay be due either to disease of the testis or to diminished
`
`ALVOGEN, Exh. 1046, p. 0003
`
`ALVOGEN, Exh. 1046, p. 0003
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket