throbber
NEWS AND VIEWS
`
`Next -generation protein drugs
`
`Ian M Tomlinson
`
`Ankyrin repeats generate high -affinity protein binders with biophysical properties that may favor
`therapeutic applications.
`
`Ask any major pharmaceutical company what
`constitutes an ideal drug and the answer
`would probably include the words `specificity,
`affinity, solubility, stability and safety' along
`with the phrases `cheap to manufacture, easy
`to formulate, simple to deliver and the right
`pharmacokinetic profile: Ironically, many
`drugs on the market fail to deliver in one or
`more of these areas because of their sub -opti-
`mal biophysical makeup. Even blockbuster
`biologics, such as therapeutic antibodies',
`suffer from drawbacks, such as the require-
`ment for an expensive mammalian cell pro-
`duction system and the need for intravenous,
`intramuscular or subcutaneous
`injection
`(with molecular weights of around 150,000,
`they are too large to be administered by any
`is room for
`other route). Clearly, there
`improvement. In this
`issue, Binz et al.2
`describe a natural scaffold, ankyrin repeat
`protein, that has promising biophysical prop-
`erties for therapeutic application. Ankyrin
`repeats are one of several new types of scaf-
`fold being developed for a new generation of
`protein therapies.
`An ideal drug would have the following
`qualities: it would have very high affinity and
`exquisite specificity for its target; it could
`be manufactured by the bucket -load in bacte-
`ria or yeast; it would be both incredibly solu-
`ble and remarkably stable;
`it could be
`delivered to any part of the human body by
`any route of administration; and, once there,
`it would hang around long enough to have
`the desired therapeutic effect. Achieving all
`these goals has been particularly difficult for
`protein drugs.
`Currently, protein drugs come in all shapes
`and sizes: some are recombinant human pro-
`teins (for instance, insulin, growth hormone
`
`Ian M. Tomlinson is Chief Scientific Officer of
`Domantis Limited, 3I5 Cambridge Science
`Park, Cambridge CB4 OWG, UK.
`e -mail: ian.tomlinson @domantis.com
`
`Ankyrin repeat protein
`
`Ribosome display selection for
`high -affinity binders to
`maltose- binding protein
`
`i?
`
`,
`
`.
`
`- _-
`
`>
`
`i
`
`-
`
`Maltose-
`binding
`protein
`
```
`
`- - -
`
`-
`
`- J
`1"e5r.
`.-, a..,
`
`Il
`
`q
`
`Ankyrin
`repeat
`protein
`
`i=
`
`and erythropoietin), others are monoclonal
`antibodies (for instance, Remicade (influx-
`imab; Johnson & Johnson, Kenilworth, NJ,
`USA), Rituxan (rituximab; Genentech; S. San
`Francisco, CA, USA) and Erbitux (cetuximab;
`ImClone, New York, NY, USA) and still others
`are viral or bacterial proteins used as vaccines
`to elicit a specific immune response. Nature
`did not evolve proteins for manufacture ex
`vivo. For this reason, many human proteins
`produced in recombinant form are difficult to
`manufacture and some cannot be expressed
`at all in microbial cell culture. Furthermore,
`the serum half -life and tissue distribution of
`endogenously expressed proteins is carefully
`controlled in vivo to optimize their biological
`activity. Most human proteins are not
`
`NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY VOLUME 22 NUMBER 5 MAY 2004
`
`Figure 1 All in a bind. Binz et al. randomized 6
`of the 33 amino acids (red side chains) in three
`ankyrin repeats (dark blue) and, using ribosome
`display, isolated a range of nanomolar binders to
`mannose- binding protein. The co- crystal structure
`confirms the predicted binding of the engineered
`ankyrin repeat protein to the mannose- binding
`protein target.
`
`designed to be administered from outside the
`body. Recombinant proteins therefore tend to
`be rapidly cleared and thus require frequent
`interest
`(thus, the growing
`injection
`in
`extending the serum half -life by, for example,
`polyethylene glycol conjugation).
`Antibodies have proved useful as human
`protein therapeutics because they exhibit a
`favorable pharmacokinetic profile. After a
`single injection, they can persist for a long
`time in the bloodstream, maintaining their
`biological activity for several weeks. However,
`antibodies have also evolved to be secreted
`from mammalian cells and, for a variety of
`reasons, cannot be expressed in yeast or bac-
`terial cell culture.
`Given the limitations of current protein
`therapies, scientists are starting to develop
`more tailored approaches to drug design
`whereby you first assemble a list of the vari-
`ous properties you want the drug to have and
`then engineer a drug with precisely those
`properties. Over the past three years, several
`new biotech companies have been set up to
`exploit the use of `well- behaved' human pro-
`teins as scaffolds to create a range of designer
`protein drugs that have improved therapeutic
`properties (see Table 1). This approach pro-
`ceeds through the following steps: first, chose
`a human protein that is well expressed in bac-
`teria and /or yeast and has good biophysical
`properties (solubility, stability and others);
`second, create a repertoire by introducing
`diversity into the loop regions of the given
`scaffold, preferably in a way that does not dis-
`rupt the overall structure of the protein; third,
`
`521
`
`Lilly Exhibit 1266
`Eli Lilly & Co. y. Teva
`Phnrmt Inl'l GM111 -1
`
`

`

`NEWS AND VIEWS
`
`Table 1 Selected companies using human proteins as scaffolds to create next -
`generation drugs
`
`Company
`
`BioRexis (King of Prussia, PA, USA)
`Borean Pharma (Aarhus, Denmark)
`Compound Therapeuticsa (Waltham, MA, USA)
`Domantis (Cambridge, UK)
`Dyax (Cambridge, MA, USA)
`Pieris ProteoLab (Freising -Weihenstephan, Germany)
`
`Protein scaffold
`
`Transferrin
`C -type lectins
`Trinectins
`Domain antibodies
`Kunitz domains
`Lipocalins
`
`°On 9 March 2004, Compound Therapeutics announced the acquisition of the intellectual property estate of Phylos
`(Lexington, MA, USA).
`
`strate in vivo efficacy with an engineered
`ankyrin repeat protein, the libraries they have
`created should be a valuable resource for
`the isolation of therapeutically relevant leads
`that are both well expressed and highly
`stable.
`Undoubtedly, there is a big drive for the
`drugs of the future to be much easier to man-
`ufacture and administer to patients. They
`must also be highly efficacious with few, if
`any, side effects. By wiping the slate clean and
`designing potent drugs based on human pro-
`tein scaffolds with good biophysical proper-
`ties, we may find that the ideal drug is closer
`than ever before.
`
`1. Reichert, J.M. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 819 -822 (2001).
`2. Binz, H.K. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 575 -582
`(2004).
`3. Scott, J.K. & Smith, G.P. Science 249, 386 -390
`(1990).
`4. Mattheakis, L.C., Bhatt, R.R. & Dower W.J. Proc. Natl.
`Acad. Sci. USA 91, 9022 -9026 (1994).
`5. Ali, S.A., Joao, H.C., Hammerschmid, F., Eder, J. &
`Steinkasserer, A. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 24066 -24073
`(1999).
`6. Jespers, L., Schon, O., James, L.C., Veprintsev, D. &
`Winter, G. J. Mol. Biol. 337, 893 -903 (2004).
`7. Sedgwick, S.G. & Smerdon, S.J. Trends Biochem. Sci.
`24, 311 -316 (1999).
`
`two or three ankyrin repeats. The diversity
`thereby generated (12 or 18 randomized
`residues) is sufficient to isolate a range of
`nanomolar binders
`to mannose- binding
`protein using ribosome display, all of which
`the desirable biophysical properties
`have
`of the parental ankyrin scaffold. Import-
`antly, the authors also showed, by co- crystal-
`lization, that the selected binders have the
`same structural fold as the parental scaffold.
`Although the authors have yet to demon-
`
`use a genotype -phenotype display system
`(such as phage3 or ribosome display) to
`select a range of binders to a given therapeutic
`target; and fourth, use some form of screen to
`identify those leads that have the desired bio-
`logical activity. If all goes according to plan,
`the outcome should be a protein that has all
`the desirable biophysical properties of the
`parental scaffold and the required potency for
`the therapeutic target.
`Of course, it's not always that straightfor-
`ward. In many cases, the mutations intro-
`the
`target
`to enable binding
`duced
`to
`compromise
`biophysical properties
`the
`and/or the three -dimensional structure of the
`parental scaffold. In some cases, it may not
`to achieve the desired
`even be possible
`potency using such a small binding footprint
`to the given target. And of course each start-
`
`ing scaffold has its unique pros and cons -
`
`intracellular or extracellular expression, diff-
`erent binding sites for purification, immuno-
`genicity and so on. Some scaffolds may have
`intrinsically long serum half- livess, whereas
`others may show unusual properties, such as
`the ability to refold reversibly after heat
`denaturation6.
`In the present paper, Binz et al. focus on the
`use of one particular scaffold, based on
`ankyrin repeats, to generate binders with bio-
`physical properties designed for therapeutic
`application. Ankyrins are proteins, first iso-
`lated in mammalian erythrocytes, involved in
`the targeting, mechanical stabilization and
`orientation of membrane proteins to special-
`ized compartments within the plasma mem-
`brane and endoplasmic reticulum. Natural
`ankyrin repeat proteins consist of many 33-
`amino -acid modules, each comprising a (3-
`turn and two anti -parallel a- helices7. They do
`not contain any disulfide bonds and therefore
`can be expressed at very high yields in the
`bacterial cytoplasm. They also seem to be
`both highly soluble and stable.
`The approach used by Binz et al. ran-
`domizes 6 of the 33 amino acids in each of
`
`overcoming the gridlock in
`discovery research
`
`Jonathan Margolis & Greg D Plowman
`
`Chemical screening in a zebrafish mutant has turned up two compounds
`that rescue a heart defect, but will this yield new drugs?
`
`Why is it so hard to find new drugs? A signifi-
`cant amount of time goes into finding and
`validating new drug targets for the develop-
`ment of small -molecule or biotherapeutic
`leads. Why not create in vivo disease models
`and directly screen for compounds that can
`ameliorate the disease state? In this issue,
`Peterson et al.' describe an effort to do just
`that, using a zebrafish mutant with an
`anatomical defect that resembles a malforma-
`tion in the human heart.
`theory, whole -organism
`screening
`In
`should circumvent the need to identify spe-
`cific drug targets, allowing the entire genome
`to be screened in a single, unbiased assay. This
`
`Jonathan Margolis and Greg D. Plowman
`are at Exelixis, 170 Harbor Way, P.O. Box 511,
`South San Francisco, CA, USA.
`e -mail: gplowman @exelixis.com
`
`approach is equivalent to a classical genetic
`mutant suppressor screen, in which one
`searches for secondary mutations that revert
`the abnormal phenotype
`to wild
`type.
`Sensitized cell -based screens have previously
`been used to identify chemical suppressors of
`a disease process -for example, drug leads
`that block the proliferation of carcinoma
`cells2. Peterson et al. extend this strategy to a
`vertebrate organism. They describe corn -
`pounds that rescue the abnormal vascular
`development of a zebrafish mutant and sug-
`gest that this could provide a rapid path to
`drug leads for diseases whose underlying biol-
`ogy is not well understood.
`The gene encoding the gridlock transcrip-
`tion factor is a classic developmental selector
`controlling the choice of angioblasts between
`venous and arterial fates in the developing
`fish heart (Fig. 1). With a partial reduction of
`gridlock activity, the bifurcation of the lateral
`
`522
`
`VOLUME 22 NUMBER 5 MAY 2004 NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket