`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`Filed: November 20, 2019
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`ELI LILLY AND COMPANY,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL GMBH,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`Case IPR2018-01710 (Patent No. 8,586,045)
`Case IPR2018-01711 (Patent No. 9,884,907)
`Case IPR2018-01712 (Patent No. 9,884,908)1
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL HEARING
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 The word-for-word identical paper is filed in each proceeding identified in the
`
`caption.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Petitioner Eli Lilly and Company (“Lilly”), pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a),
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`respectfully requests oral argument on all grounds of unpatentability, motions, and
`
`other arguments raised in IPR2018-01710, IPR2018-01711, and IPR2018-01712.
`
`Because all three proceedings have significant commonality, Lilly requests a
`
`consolidated oral argument with one hour allocated to each party, including time for
`
`rebuttal. To the extent the Board schedules a different amount of time, Lilly requests
`
`an amount of time equal to that granted to Patent Owner. Lilly also requests that the
`
`panel hear oral argument at the USPTO main office in Alexandria, Virginia.
`
`Lilly requests the ability to use audio-visual equipment to display
`
`demonstrative exhibits, including a projector and screen to display PowerPoint
`
`slides. If this request for oral hearing is granted, Lilly will direct its requests for
`
`audio-visual equipment to Trials@uspto.gov.
`
`Lilly also requests that ten spaces be reserved at the oral hearing to
`
`accommodate counsel and corporate representatives. Lastly, Lilly requests that three
`
`attorneys be allowed to use computers at the hearing.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: November 20, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /William B. Raich/
`William B. Raich (Reg. No. 54,386)
`Erin M. Sommers (Reg. No. 60,974)
`Pier D. DeRoo (Reg. No. 69,340)
`Yieyie Yang (Reg. No. 71,923)
`
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &
`Dunner, L.L.P.
`901 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20001-4413
`Telephone: 202-408-4000
`Facsimile: 202-408-4400
`
`Sanjay M. Jivraj (Reg. No. 61,806)
`Mark J. Stewart (Reg. No. 43,936)
`Eli Lilly and Company Lilly Corporate
`Center
`Indianapolis, IN 46285
`
`3
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing Petitioner’s Request
`
`for Oral Hearing was served electronically via email on November 20, 2019, in
`
`its entirety, on the following:
`
`Deborah A. Sterling
`Robert C. Millonig
`Gaby L. Longsworth
`Jeremiah B. Frueauf
`Olga A. Partington
`Dennies Varughese
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`dsterling-PTAB@sternekessler.com
`bobm-PTAB@sternekessler.com
`glongs-PTAB@sternekessler.com
`jfrueauf-PTAB@sternekessler.com
`opartington-PTAB@sternkessler.com
`dvarughe-PTAB@sternekessler.com
`
`
`Patent Owner has consented to service by email.
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /William Esper/
`William Esper
`Litigation Legal Assistant
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`
`
`
`
`Date: November 20, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
