throbber
Pharmacological coupling and functional role for CGRP
`receptors in the vasodilation of rat pial arterioles
`
`KI WHAN HONG, SUNG-EUN YOO, SUNG SUK YU,
`,JUNG YOON LEE, AND lWUNG YONG l{Hll\11
`Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Pusan National University,
`Pusan 602-739; Center for Biofunctional Molecules, Pohang; and
`Korea Research Institute o/ Chemical Technology, Dajeon, Korea
`
`Hong, Ki Whan, Sung-Eun Yoo, Sung Suk Yu, Jung
`Yoon Lee, and Byung Yong Rhim. Pharmacological cou(cid:173)
`pling and functional role for CGRP receptors in the vasodila(cid:173)
`tion of rat pial artoriolos. Am . .I. Ph._ysiol. 270 (Heart Circ.
`Physiol. 39): H317-H323, 1996.- Tn this study, we investi(cid:173)
`gated tho sig11al transduction underlying the vasodilator
`action of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in the rat
`pial arterioles. In an in vivo experiment, changes in pial
`arterial diameters (20.2 ::':: L!:l µm ) were observed under
`suffusion with mock cerebrospinal fluid containing CGRP
`(l0 - 9- 10- 7 M) directly through a closed cranial window.
`Changes in intracellular adenosine 3' ,5' -cyclic · monophos(cid:173)
`phaie (cAlvIP) accumulation in reHponse to CGRP and levcro(cid:173)
`makalim were measured in the pial arterioles in an in vitro
`experiment. CGRP-induced va:-;ndilatinn and cAMP prnduc•
`tion were significantly inhibited by specific CGHP antibody
`serum and CGRP-(8- 37) fragment, suggesting involvement.
`of the CGRP1 receplor sublype. Vasodilation and increase in
`cAMP production evoked by CGRP were inhibited not only by
`glibenclamide (ATP-sern;itive K+ channel hlocker) but, also by
`charybdotoxin (large-conductan~e Ca2+-activated K- channel
`blocker), but this was not the case for the isoproterenol(cid:173)
`inrlnc:ed vasodilat:ion and cAMP production. 'l'hc~s,~ findings
`implicate the A'I'P-RenRitive K
`channels and the large(cid:173)
`conductance Ca2 1 -activated K I channels in the CGRP recep(cid:173)
`tor-coupled cAivfP product.ion for vasodilation. Further study
`is required to identify whether the cAMP-dependent K
`channel activation is related to CGRP-induced vasorelax(cid:173)
`ation of the rat pial arterioles.
`calciwnin gen e -relate d peptide; adenosine 3' ,5 '-cyclic mono(cid:173)
`phosphnte; potassium channels
`
`pial arterioles, and the vasodilatory effect of CGRP is
`associated with an activation of ATP-sensit ive K + chan(cid:173)
`nels (14, 18). Recently, Kitazono et al. (16) reported that
`activation of ATP-sensitive K + channels in the rat
`basilar artery was mediated by an adenosine 3 1 ,5' -
`r.yr.lir monophosph:=itP. (r.AMP)-clP.pP.nclP.nt mer.h:=inism
`in the CGRP-imluced vasuuilatiun. On Lhe uLher hauu,
`the vasodilator response to CGRP has been corrclut.cd
`with increases in cAMP and guanosine 3 ',5'-cyclic
`monophosphate (7, 17). However, the clependency of
`CGRP-induced vasodilation on the endothelium is re(cid:173)
`portedly not consistent among species and among or(cid:173)
`gans (2, 7, 12).
`In the present study, we investigate th e important
`target of signal transduction mechanisms underlying
`the vasodilator action of CG.RP in the rat pial arteri(cid:173)
`oles. We have measured two pararm:iers in ihe re(cid:173)
`sponse to CGRP: 1) the changes in the luminal diam(cid:173)
`P.tP.r of pi:=il :=irtP.riolP.s in thP. in vivo PxpPrimP.nt and 2)
`the changes in cAMP production in the pial arterioles in
`the in vitro experiment in the absence and presence of
`K+ channel blockers, because it has been document ed
`that the relaxant effects of CGRP on the vascular
`smooth muscles are inhibited by glibenclamide (25).
`The results induced by CGRP were compared with
`those evoked by isoprotcrenol and levcromakalim. ln
`particular, the biochemical action (activation of adenyl
`cyclase) of CGRP was corn~lated with ih1 functional
`effect (vasodilation) in the rat pial arterioles.
`
`A GROWING BODY Of EVIDENCE has demonstrated that
`culcitonin gone rolutod peptide (CGRP) exerts an ox
`tremely potent vasodilating effect on the cerebral ar(cid:173)
`tery in vitro (7, 29) and on the pial artery in Ritu (20,
`34). In tho cerebral vessols, CGRP-immunoroaciivo
`nerve fibers are demonstrated in all major arteries and
`cortical arterioles, including human pia1 arterioles (8).
`CGRP has been proposed a s a candidate neurotransmit(cid:173)
`ter involved in nonsympathetic neurogenic vasodila(cid:173)
`tion oftlrn rPrPhr:=i 1 v:rnr.11 l:=ir hPrl (1, ~!-))_
`It is widely known that activation of ATP-sensitive
`K+ channels is an important mechanism of many
`va!mdilators (24, 26). The vasodilator effect of CGRP is
`mediated in part, via activation of ATP-sern;itive K'
`channels (25) in contrast to other arteries (27). Re(cid:173)
`cently, we reported that CGRP is implicated in cerebral
`autoregulation; that is, CGRP, which is reflexly re(cid:173)
`leased from perivascular sensory fibers in response to a
`t ransie nt hypote n sion, m ediates the vasodila tion of rat
`
`l\'IATERIAL!-l AND METHODS
`
`Preparation o(Amma1s
`
`Spr<!gue-Dawley r·ats (2G0-300 g) were anestheti,;ed with
`urethan (1 g/kg ip) and placed on a heating pad to maintain a
`curn;Laul botly LemµeraLure. Afler a Lrad1eoi:iLomy wa:; per(cid:173)
`formed, each rat was ventilated with a respirator (model 683,
`Harvard) with room air. The left femoral artery was cannu(cid:173)
`lated with PE-50 polyethylene tubing for m onitoring blood
`pressure (Statham P23D pressure transducer). Arterial blood
`was collected through the left carotid artery before and after
`installation ofa cranial window for blood gas and pH determi(cid:173)
`nation (STAT Profile 3, Nova Biomcdicals). The mean arterial
`blood gases and pH determined during ex periments were as
`follows: pH, 7.37 .:!:: 0.01; arterial Pco2, 31.3 .::. 1.6 mmHg;
`artc \riiil Po2, ~8.0 ::':: 2.2 mmHg. Rc\cb1l t.l\mpc\ratun\ was
`monitored continuously and kept constant {37 .c.. O.G°C) with a
`heating pad.
`
`Pial microvessels were visualized through an implanted
`cranial window, as described previously (14). Briefly, the h ead
`
`0363-6 135/96 S5. 00 Copyright © 1996 the Ame rican Phy8iological Society
`
`H3l7
`
`

`

`H318
`
`CGRP AND RAT PlAL ARTERIOLE
`
`was fixed in the prone position with a stereotaxic apparatus
`(Stoelting), and a square (5 X 5-mm) craniotomy was made
`over Lhe righL parietal corlex. The durn ww; opened, and Lhe
`buIT hole ,vas covered with warmed mineral oil during the
`operation. Pial precapillary micruvessels (15-25 µm) were
`visualized through the implanted cranial window. Cerebral
`micruvessels were allowed lo equilibrate for 60 min after
`installation of the cranial window. The window field was
`suffused with mock cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at 0.3 ml/min.
`The image of pi.al vessels was captured wi.th a CCD videocam(cid:173)
`era (Sanyo. VDC 8900) through a stereoscope (model SMZ-2T,
`Nikon) and fed to a television monitor for direct observation,
`llnr'I t.hP. r.ll lihP.r Wl'IS mP.l'ISllrP.cl m;ing ri \Vin th nnn ly:u~r (H ama(cid:173)
`matsu) at X 480 magnification. The composition (mM) of the
`mock CSF was as follows: 125 NaCl, 3.5 KCl, 1.3 CaC12, 1.1
`MgCl2, am! 2f> NaHCO3. The iuLracranial pressure was
`maintained constant at 5-6 mm.Hg throughout the experi(cid:173)
`ment by ac,ljusting- the height of the free end of the plastic
`tubing, which was connected to the outlet of the window. In
`each rat, only one arteriole was observed wider the window.
`
`Protocols of In Vivo Experiment
`
`1) We identified the normal autoregulatory response of the
`pial artery to a decline in arterial blood pressure by bleeding
`the blood into the reservoir and to a rise in blood pressure by
`infusing the blood under sutfosion with mock CSF ovr.r the
`cerebral cortical surface. 2) We observed the vusodilutor
`responses of the resting pial vessels to CGRP suffused with
`the mock CSF. Each concentration of drug was suffused over
`th,1 cort.ir:al s11rfnce for ~ min. 8) ThP. inhihitory P.ffoct.s of
`CGRP antibody scrum (1:1,000) and CGilP-(8- 37) fragment
`(10 8 M) on the CCRP-induced vasodilation were identified.
`The change in luminal diameLer wa~ moniLured with a width
`analyzer every 4 s. 4) Furlhermore, to see the inhibitory
`effects of the K' channel blockers glibenclamide and charyb(cid:173)
`dotoxin, they were applied from 30 min before suffusion of
`CGRP or other agonists.
`
`Cyclic Nucleotide Determination
`
`Rats (Sprague-Dawley, 250- :l00 g) were anesthetized with
`ether and killed by bleeding from carotid arteries. By direct
`observation under a stereoscope, the pial artery and its
`branches (20-30 µm diameter) were dissected from the
`surface of the cerebral cortex, the adhering cxtravascular
`tissue was 1·emoved, and the intraluminal cell components
`were cleaned by perfusion with mock CSF. Adenyl cyclase
`activity was measured on the pial arterioles, as described by
`Edwards ct al. (9). The tissues were subjected to freezing and
`t.h;nving t.wic.P. in liqnid nit.rogP.n ::md fin:=i lly st.orP.n ovPrnight,
`in liquid nitrogen. 'l'he tissues were incubated for 30 min in
`the working buffer consisting of (in mM) 100 tris(hydroxy(cid:173)
`methyl)aminomethane, 4.0 MgC12, 0.2f> ~DTA, 1.0 3-isobutyl-
`1-methylxanthine, 0.3 ATP, 0.1 guanosine 5'-triphosphate,
`and 20 phosphocreatine and 200 U/ml creatine kinase (pH 7.4
`at 30°C) without and with drugs. The incubation was stopped
`by addition of 0.2 N HCl (50 µI) and freezing in liquid
`nitrogen. ThereafLer, the pH of the buffer was readjusted by
`addition of0.::! N NaOH and sodium acetate buffer. cAMP was
`measured with a radioimmunoassay kit purchased from
`AmP.rsham Life Science Products. The activity of adenyl
`cyclase was expressed as femtomolcs of cAMP per square
`millimeter of arteriole surface per 30 min.
`
`Drugs
`
`bovine serum albumin to make a stock solution of 0.1 mM.
`Rabbit antiserum to rat CGRP (Cambridge Research Bio(cid:173)
`chemical:;) was J.iluLeJ. wiLh muck CSF. GliLeuclamide (Sigma
`Chemical) was sonicated in 1 ml ofNaOH (0.1 N) and diluted
`with 5% glucose to make a stoc.:k solution of 10 mM. Isuproter(cid:173)
`enol HCI and forskolin were purchased from Sigma Chemical.
`Levcromakalim was donated by Korea Research Institute of
`Chemical Technology.
`
`Statistics
`Results are expressed as means ..:_ SE. Statistical signifi(cid:173)
`cance was determined by Student's t-test between two groups
`in Lhe measurement uf cAl'vlP levels, arn.l analysis uf variauce
`was used for comparisons of the results ofvasodilators in the
`absence and presence of antagonists. P < 0.05 was considered
`to be statistically significant.
`
`RESULTS
`
`In control rats, mean arterial blood pressure was
`115. 7 ±: 2.5 mmHg (n = 48) und the resting diumctcr of
`pial arteriole was 20.2 + 1.9 pm, which was constant
`throughout the experiment unless there was bleeding
`or an infusion of blood.
`Table 1 compares effects of CG RP and levcromakalim
`on the changes in luminal diameter of pial arterioles.
`When cortical surface was suffused with mock CSF
`containing CGRP (10 9- 10 7 M) and levcromakalim
`(10- 7 and 10- 6 M), hy increasing each concentration,
`the diameter of µial arLerioles was remarkably in(cid:173)
`creased in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 1,
`Tabh~ 1). After 30 min of continuous suffusion with
`normal mock CSF, the luminal diameter returned
`almost to the original control value (21.5 ±: 3.1 µm ). The
`maximum responses occurred at 10- 7 M CGRP and
`10 6 M levcromakalim. The maximum diameters were
`28.0 :t 2.2 (n ~ 15, 38.6%) and 27.4 ±: 2.2 µm (n = 4,
`38.4%), r espective ly.
`
`C:hangP..<1, in TJiamP.tP.r in ln Vinn ExpP.riment
`
`Effects of CGRP antibody serum and CGRP-(8- 37).
`The CCRP-induced vasodilation was significantly inhib(cid:173)
`ited under suffusion with mock CSF conLaining CGRP
`antibody serum (1:1,000) and CGRP-(8-:37) fragment
`(10 8 M) from 30 min before Lhe experiment (Fig. 2).
`Application of CGRP antibody serum or CGRP-(8-37)
`
`Table 1. Concentration-dependent increase in diameter
`nf pial arterinleR under suffza;ion with mock CSF
`containing CORP and leucromalmlim in mls
`
`Cuncen~raLion, M
`
`Diameter Control
`
`n
`
`10- 9
`
`10- 0
`
`10-7
`
`10- 0
`
`CGRP
`
`20.2 ±: 1.9 16 19.9 ±: 2.1 23.7::: 2.F 28.0 ±: 2.2,:,
`-1.5
`17 .3
`38.6
`Leucromakalim
`
`19.8 ::t:: 5.5 4
`
`22.6 ::t:: 6.P 27.4 = 2.2''
`11.1
`:38.1
`
`µm
`%.1
`
`µm
`';{:.~
`
`CORP (Sigma Chemical), CGRP-(8-37) (Peninsula), and
`charybdotoxin (Peptide TnstitutP.) wer e dissolved in 0.1 %
`
`Values are mean;; +- SE; n, nu. of experimenL::;. CSF, ce,.ebrospinal
`fluid; CGH.I'. calc.ilonin gc.nc.-n~lalr,d peptide. * /' < O.Oii vs. control.
`
`

`

`CGRP AND RAT PIAL ARTERIOLE
`
`H319
`
`t
`-9
`
`G)
`
`80 A
`... 40
`1i
`E 0
`'°
`~-40
`~
`8,80
`C
`~40
`0
`"<fl 0
`
`CGRP, log M
`
`-40
`Fig. 1. Concentration-dependent increase in diameter of ral pial
`arterioles under suffusion with mock cerebrospinal fluid contriining
`calcitonin gene-related peptide (CCRP, 10-9-10-7 M, n - 15; A) and
`levcromakalim (L-CRK, 10 7 and 10 6 M, n - 4; B ). Values are
`means= SE.
`
`l•CRK,109 M
`
`fragment itself did not signifir.:rntly ::itfP.r.t. t.hP. vP.ssr.l
`diameter (Table 2).
`Effect of K' channel antagonists on CG RP-induced
`vasodilatinn. The vasodilation induced by CGRP ( 10- 9_
`10 ; M) and levcromakalim (10 7 and 10 (i M), a K
`channel opener, was significantly inhibited under previ(cid:173)
`ous suffusion with glibenclamide (lo-r, M), an ATP(cid:173)
`sensitive K - channel antagonist, or charybdotoxin (3 X
`10-7 M), a large-conductance Ca2 -activated K ' chan(cid:173)
`nel antagonist, respectively (Figs. 3 and 1). Suffusion
`with mock CSF containing glibenclamide or charybdo(cid:173)
`toxin from 30 min before Lhe experiment Jiu nut aired
`the resting diameter of pinl arteries (Table 2). These
`results implicate the Ca2+ -activated K+ channels and
`
`Table 2. Effects of xlibenclnmide cuul chwybdotoxin,
`K· channel blockers, and CGRP-(8-37) and CORP
`antibody serum, CGRP antagonists, on diameter
`of' rat pial arterioles
`
`Antagonists
`
`Glibenclamide
`(10 " M)
`Charybdotoxin
`(3 X 10 'M)
`CGRP-(8-37)
`(10 RM)
`CGRP antibody serum
`(1:1,000)
`
`11
`
`8
`
`9
`
`5
`
`4
`
`Control
`Diameter.
`µm
`
`Change in
`Diameter,
`µm
`
`%Change
`in
`Diameter
`
`21.1 :t 4.4
`
`18.7 :t 3.2
`
`-1.3 = 1.4
`
`20.9:!: 3.2
`
`19.5 :!: 2,2
`
`-3.3 = 4.7
`
`17.4:': 1.8
`
`18.5 :': 3.1
`
`0.3 e-. G.0
`
`21.8 ± 1.8
`
`22.3 ± 2.3
`
`2.0::t4.3
`
`Value8 are mean8 _!.. SE; rt, 110. ufexperimeu~~-
`
`lhe ATP-seusilive K+ channels in lhe vasodilai.ion
`evoked by CGRP and levcromakalim.
`H,tfect of" K ; channel antagonists on the ua.sodila.tion
`b_y isoproterenol. When the cortical surface was suf(cid:173)
`fused with mock CSF containing isoprolerenol (l0-6 M),
`the luminal diameter was increased in a concentration(cid:173)
`dependent manner. The vasodilation induced by isopro(cid:173)
`terenol (] 0 6 M), however, was not inhibited by gliben(cid:173)
`clamide (10- 5 M) and charybdotoxin (3 X 10-7 M; Fig. 5).
`
`Changes in r.AMP Prndur.tinn in In Vitrn Experiments
`
`In another series of experiments, we compared the
`effects of CCRP (10- 7 and 10-n M) and levcromakalim
`(10- 6 M) on the stimulation of adenyl cyclase. Signifi(cid:173)
`cant stimulation (P <_ 0.05) was observed with 10-u M
`CGRP bul not with 10-6 M levcromakalim (Fig. 6).
`
`80 A
`40
`
`80 A
`40
`
`t
`CGRP, -7
`
`0
`
`8
`
`~
`
`..
`~ -40
`Q) 80
`E
`«I :a 40
`8i O lff--'4~~tX.:,.,hi__.,ll-
`c::
`t
`!-1!
`CGRP,-7
`0 --40 7--....1----iL--_,..__ ....... _____ _.
`#- ao c
`40
`
`t
`--8
`
`t
`-7
`
`CGRP, logM
`
`0
`
`t
`·9
`
`.. a, 80 B
`
`~ -40
`
`E
`l'O
`:S 40
`C:
`G>
`C) 0
`C
`(U
`s;;, -40
`CJ
`o9. 80 C
`40
`
`0
`
`-40
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`
`CGRP,logM
`10 12 14 16
`8
`6
`Time, min
`Fig-. 3. Eflect of suffusion with CGRP no-9 , 10- 8 , and 10- 7 Ml(cid:173)
`containing mock ccrcbrospinal fluid in absence (A) and prcscmce of
`glibendamide (10 GM; Tr) or charyhdotoxin (;; x 10 7 M; C). Valui,.s
`are means + SE from 5 experiments.
`
`-7
`
`log M
`6
`
`t
`CGRP, -7
`
`0
`
`1
`
`2
`
`4
`
`5
`
`--40
`
`3
`Time, min
`r'ig. 2. E ffect of suffusion with CGRP (10-7 Mi-containing mock
`ccrdiro~pinul Jluid in ubGonco (A ) and presence of specific· CGRP
`antibody serum (1:1,000; B) or CGHP-(8-37) (lo-0 .\•l) fragment
`(C). Values are means + SE from 5-6 experiments.
`
`

`

`CGRP AND RA'l' I'lAL ARTEH!OLE
`
`t
`-6
`
`L-CRK,log M
`
`t
`-7
`
`C
`
`.. -40
`-E:
`ao B
`tG
`:S 40
`.£
`8> 0
`CG fl -40 -1,. __ _ . __ ~ __ _ . ._ __ ..__L_-C_R_K_.,,•._0_9__.M 1
`'if. ao C
`
`40
`
`0
`
`-40
`
`I
`-7
`
`0
`
`2
`
`I
`-6
`
`4
`6
`Time, min
`
`L-CRK, log M
`
`8
`
`10
`
`Fig. 1. Effoct of r,uffuflion with lcvcl'Omokolim (L-CRK, 10-7 and
`10 6 M)-containing mock cerebrospinal Jluid in ah;;ence (A) and
`presence of glilwnr.l!imicfo (10-0 M; R) or chorybdotoxin (3 X 10 7 M;
`Cl. Values are means - SE from 4 experiments.
`
`When the pial arteriole was incubated in the depolariz(cid:173)
`ing physiological salt solution (60 mM K- ) containing
`10-G M CGRP, the CGRP-induced increase in cAMP
`production vvas not altered (data not shown).
`
`80 A
`40
`
`0
`
`.. ~-40
`
`~ 80 B
`«I
`:S 40
`C
`(II 0
`Ol
`C
`(V
`.c-40
`(,)
`# 80
`
`40
`
`0
`
`-40
`
`I
`ISP,-6
`
`t
`ISP,-6
`
`t
`ISP, -6
`
`0
`
`1
`
`log M
`5
`
`4
`
`3
`2
`Time, min
`Fig. 5. Effect of suffusion with isoprntl'rP.nol (TRP, ,o-r; M ) inr.lnclP.cl in
`mock ccrcbro~pinu l fluid without (A) ond with pretr eatm ent with
`glibenclamide (10-'' M; B ) or charybdotoxin (3 X HJ ·; M; C). Values
`are mean,; -+: SE from 7 cxpcri men ts.
`
`L-CRK
`CGRP
`Fig. 6. Effects of CORP (10-1; M, left ) anrl levcromakalim (L-CRK,
`10-6 M, ri{[ht) on adenyl cyclase activily and inhibition by CGRP
`antibody serum (1:1,000) and CGRP-(8- 37) fragment (1Q- 6 M) of
`CGRP oo-6 Ml-induced stimulation of cAM I-' production in ml. pial
`arte1-ioles. Open bars, control; filled bars, CGRP or L-CRK: 8tippled
`barn, +CGRP anti,;;erum; hatched bars, +CCRP .(8 37). Values ar c
`means + SE from 4-5 cxperimentH. • l' <. 0.0/5 vs. control; 0 P < 0.05
`vs. CGRP alone.
`
`Ef{P.cfa of' COHP nntihnrfy .'u>.mm and CURP-(8-37)
`fi-agment. CGRP (10- 7 and 10 ° M) caused a significant
`increase in ckviP production in the pial arterioles from
`19.9 + 2.8 (basal level) to 29.5 ± 3.5 and 37.8 .±.. 5.1
`fmol ·mm 2 <JO min - 1, respectively (P < 0.05). The
`increase in cAMP production induced by CGRP (1 o-6 1\.I)
`was significantly inhibited by pretreatment ,,vith CGRP
`antibody serum (1:1,000; P < 0.05 ) or CGl{P-(8-37)
`fragment (10-6 M; P < 0.05), implicating cAl\:IP in the
`CGRP-induced vasodilation of the pial arterioles (Fig. 6).
`Effect nl K ' r.h.rm.nd nn.tngnnist.c; nn. cA MP production .
`The CGRP-inducet.l i11crease in <.AlvIP levels was signifi(cid:173)
`cantly inhibited by churybdot uxin (3 x 10-7 M) as well
`as by glibenclamide uo- 5 M; Fig. 7). However, the
`increase in cAMP production induced by isoproterenol
`(lO· 6 M) was not blocked by glibenclamide (10-~ M) or
`by charybdotoxin (3 X 10 · 7 M; Fig. 7).
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The major fin<lingt,; of this study in the rat pial
`arterioles arc as follows: 1) the CGRP receptors mediat(cid:173)
`ing vasodilation and stimulation of cAMP accumula-
`
`a
`
`Cl)-
`
`40
`~
`~-~
`g~ 30
`(I) 't
`.!!!E
`~ii:
`u:i
`_c[
`>U
`,, _
`;j 10
`<
`
`20
`
`0
`
`ISP
`CGRP
`l◄'ig. 7. Effects of K- channr.l blockers gl ibe ncla mide (10 ., M) and
`charybdutuxin (3 X 10··7 M ) o n CCRP(lO 6 M, left)- nnd iRoprotere no]
`(ISP, 10 "M, righ t)-induced slimula!.ion of adenyl cyclase in rat pial
`:wt c rinlc., Open b8t'S, control; Jilled lmrs, CGRP ur ISP; stippled bars,
`I glibenclamide; hatched bars, I charybdotoxin. Vnlues m·e n1eans ::t
`s1,; from 4-5 experiments. " f' < 0.05 vs. control: "P < 0.05 vs. CCiRP
`only.
`
`

`

`CCRP AND RAT PU.L ARTERIOLE
`
`HJ21
`
`tion in response to CGRP belonged to the CGRP1
`receptor subtype, 2} vasodilation and accumulation of
`intracellular cAMP in response to CGRP were mark(cid:173)
`edly inhibited by the K+ channel blockers, and 3)
`isuµrolerenol-induced stimulation of aden_yl cyclase
`activity and vasodilation was not inhibited by the K+
`channel blockers. In these experiments, we employed
`glibenclamide (an ATP-sensitive K I channel blocker)
`(:10) and charyhdotoxin (a large-conductance Ca2 +(cid:173)
`activated K- channel blocker) (11) to characterize a
`causative relationship between K+ channel activation
`awl cAMP accumulaLion in response Lo CGRP. In our
`experiments, to ensure that identical arterioles are
`s:rn1plerl, the pin I nrterioles oft.he <'.en~h1·nl sndi:ir.e thnt
`were used for in vivo experiments were dissected and
`utilized.
`Our results showed that arterial diameter and
`adenyl cyclase activity of the pial arterioles were
`increased by CGRP. These CGRP effects were signifi(cid:173)
`cantly antagonized under suffusion with immuno(cid:173)
`reactive specific antibody serum for CGRP and a COOR(cid:173)
`terminal fragment CGRP-(8-37) CGRP, receptor
`antagonist (6). These results indicate that the CORP
`receptors that arc present on the rat pial arterioles and
`mediate vasodilation and cAMP production appear to
`be of the CGRP1 subtype.
`Recently, much evidence suggests that activation of
`ATP-RPnRitivP K+ channPlR anrl Ca2- -ar.tivatPrl K- ch:rn(cid:173)
`nels exerts an important role in vasodilation (24, 26).
`Nevertheless there is some controversy over whether
`the K+ channel openers exert relaxation in the rat
`cerebral vasculature. Mccarron et al. (19) and McPher(cid:173)
`son and Stork (21) reported that K · channel openers
`did not relax the small-resistance arteries from the rat
`cerebral vessels, whereas Nagao et al. (23) demon(cid:173)
`t-iLraLeu crumahalim-iuuuceu relaxaLiun orthe raL posLe(cid:173)
`rior cerebellar artery. We have shown that levcromaka(cid:173)
`lim exerted a strong vasodilator effect, which was
`markedly inhibited not only by glibenclamide but also
`by charybdotoxin, suggesting that the vasorelaxation
`to levcromakalim appears to result from the presence
`and activation of the ATP-sensitive K channels and
`the Ca2 1 -activated K 1
`· channels in the pial arterioles.
`Sovoral difforonL K + channels were demonstrated to be
`responsible for the. actions of K + channel openers in
`various vascular beds (10, 15, 32). Furthermore it is
`known that, in vivo, the pressure drop is larger and the
`regulatory processes are more important in the micro(cid:173)
`vasculature than in large cerebral arteries (22). There(cid:173)
`fore the large regional difference in the responses of
`cerebral arteries might be very dependent on the
`situation of the tissues, for example, in vivo vs. in vitro
`or different preexisLing condiLions (e.g., depolari:11at.ion
`or contracting state).
`WP havP shown t.hat thP C(;l{P-inrln<'.Prl vasorlilation
`was inhibited by not only glibenclamide but also charyb(cid:173)
`dotoxin, as was the levcromakalim-induced vasodila(cid:173)
`tion. Glibenclamide and charybdotoxin showed no addi(cid:173)
`tive action on the CGRP-induced vasodilation. It is not
`known how ATP-sensitive K- channels and large(cid:173)
`conductance Ca2 - -activated K+ channels are activated
`
`by CGRP in the pial arterioles. Carl et al. (4) demon(cid:173)
`strated that, in cell-attached patches from canine colon
`cells, levcromakalim increased the open probability of
`large-conductance Ca2 + -activated K 1 channels, which
`were prevented by glibenclamide and tetraethylammu(cid:173)
`nium. Thus further study is required to identify electro(cid:173)
`physiologically whether the K+ channels activated by
`CGRP in the pial arteries share the properties of
`ATP-sensitive K + channels and Ca2 - -regulated K- chan(cid:173)
`nels. Recently, Trezise and Weston (33) compared the
`relaxant and hyperpolarizing actions of CGRP with
`those of BRL-38227 (levcromakalim) iu Lhe raLLiL
`basilar arteries. They reported that CGRP consistently
`P.vokr.d a glibenclamidr.-inhibitrible hypr.rpolarizrition ,
`though it was less than that evoked by BRL-38227.
`Vasorelaxation induced by CGRP has been proposed
`to be mediated by two interesting pharmacological
`actions: 1) stimulation of adenyl cyclase activity with a
`subsequent accumulation of intracellular cAMP (7, 9)
`and 2) activation of the K- channels and subsequent
`hyperpolarization ('25, :~5). The role of the K + channels
`was reported in the vascular response to several endog(cid:173)
`enous vasodilators (1, 3}.
`We have shown that CGRP significantly stimulated
`the adenyl cyclase activity with subsequent accumula(cid:173)
`tion of intracellular cAMP in the pial arterioles. This
`CGRP effect on cAMP production was markedly inhib(cid:173)
`itP-rl hy glihPnclarnirfo :rnri cha.ryhrlotoxin. ThPRP find(cid:173)
`ings strongly support a role for the ATP-sensitive K+
`channels and the large-conductance Ca2--activated K+
`channels in the CGRP receptor-coupled cAMP produc(cid:173)
`tion and vasorelaxation. In support of this conclusion is
`Lhe recent report (31) that a hypcrpolarization-acti(cid:173)
`vated K I conductance of the cell membrane of Parame(cid:173)
`cium directly stimulates adenyl cyclase activity as a
`carrier or ~he K+ re::;Liug cumlucLam:e. However, iL has
`not been reported whether the K + conductance-coupled
`cAM !-'-producing system exists in the smooth muscle
`cells. We have shown that CGRP-induced stimulation
`of adenyl cyclase activity was not affected by levcro(cid:173)
`makalim , a hyperpolarizing agent, or by depolarizing
`) . It is likely that
`physiological salL solution (60 mM K 1
`the activation of adenyl cyclase is not influenced by a
`change in mcmbrnno potential but is linked to an
`adjacent K+ channel by an unknown mechanism. It is
`not clear how CGRP increases the K' conductance in
`the pial arterioles and whether the hvo K ' channels act
`independently or cooperatively.
`Recently, Nelson et al. ( 25) showed that CGRP acti(cid:173)
`vates an ATP-sensitive K+ channel in single smootl1
`muscle cells from rabbit mesenteric artery, and Ed(cid:173)
`wards et al. (9) suggested that CGRP receptors in
`va~cular ~muuU1 mucde are couµled Lo adeuyl cyclase.
`Thus it is considered that activation of adenyl cyclase is
`dosPly linkPrl to thP K channPls in vaRrnlar smooth
`muscle cells. However, we do not know whether the K+
`channel blockers such as ghbenclamide and charybdo(cid:173)
`toxin directly block the CGRP receptors. Additional in
`vitro studies are needed to identify a causative relation(cid:173)
`ship between the inhibition of adenyl cyclase activity
`and CGRP receptors by these K + channel blockers,
`
`

`

`H322
`
`CGRP AND RAT PIAL ARTERIOLE
`
`because Trezise and Weston (33) demonstrated ihaL
`CCRP and 1evcrornaka1im are capable of opening glib(cid:173)
`enclamide-senRitive K+ rhannels in rahhit hrisil:w rir(cid:173)
`tery. Otherwise, it can be considered that CGRP-evoked
`rcluxution is almost dependent on the adenylate cy(cid:173)
`clase activation, whereas levcromakalim-induced relax(cid:173)
`ation is certainly a conRequence of the opening of Ki·
`channels.
`On t.he other hand, a number of results regarding
`cAMP-dependent K- channel activation have been
`demonstrated in cultured smooth muscle cells of rat
`aorta (28), in Drosophila. larval muscle (5), and in rat
`basilar artery (16). We examined the responses of the
`pial arkriole:o Lu i::;oproLereuol (B-a<lrenoceptor activa(cid:173)
`tor), which activates adcnyl cyclase via G protein. As
`mentioned above, neither isoproterenol-induced vasodi(cid:173)
`lation nor isoproterenol-induced increase in cAMP pro(cid:173)
`duction was aflected by the K+ channel antagonists
`glibenclamide and charybdotoxin. Hiramatsu and co(cid:173)
`workers (13) reported the suppression by charybdo(cid:173)
`toxin of the isoproterenol-induced relaxation of the
`guinea pig tracheal smooth muscle, and they postu(cid:173)
`lated that isoprotcrenol-induced relaxation occurs at
`least in part through opening of charybdotoxin-sensi(cid:173)
`tive K+ channels by means of a cAMP-dependent
`channel modulation. However, the preRent st.miy with
`rat pial arterioles, in contrast, showed lack of effects of
`glibcnclumidc und c:hurybdotoxin on the isoproterenol(cid:173)
`induced relaxation, thereby suggesting a lack ofinvolve(cid:173)
`ment of the hyperpolarization of cell membrane by
`stimulation of the ATP-sensitive K+ channels and
`Ca2+-activated K+ channels. We could not provide
`direct evidence regarding the involvement of cAMP(cid:173)
`depcndent K+ channel activation without patch-clamp
`techniques.
`Taken together, it is suggested that the CGRP1
`ret:eplurs, when activated by CGRP, are coupled to
`adcnyl cyclase activation and opening ofK- channels in
`the pial arter.ioles.
`
`Address for reprint requests: K. W. Hong, Dept. of Pharmacology,
`College of Medicine, Pusan National University, A.mi-dong 1-Ga,
`Seo-gu, Pusan 602-739, Korea.
`lfo1:eived 24 January 1995; a~~eµLeu iu final form 13 June 1995.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Hevan, J. A., and J. E. Brayden. Nonadrenergic vn~odilntor
`mechanisms. Circ. Re.s. GO: :l09-:32G, 1987.
`2 Brain, S. D., T. T. Williams, J. lt. Tippins, H . .K. Morris, and
`I. MacIntyre. Calcitonin gene-related peptide is a potent vasodi(cid:173)
`lator. Nature Loncl. ::H3: 54-56, 1985.
`8. Brayden, J.E., J.M. Quayle, N. B. Standen, and M. T.
`Nelson. Role of potassium channels in the vascular response to
`endogenous and pharmacological vasodilators. B lood Vessels its:
`147-153, 1991.
`4. Carl, A., S. Bowen, C. H. Gelbaml, K. M. Sanden;, anti J, R.
`Hume. Cromakalim and lemakalim activate Cai--dependent K ·
`chunnel0 in canine colon. Pflucgcrs Arch. 421: 67 76, 1992.
`5. Delgado, R., P. Hidalgo, F. Diaz, R. Latorre, and P. Labarca.
`A cyclic Al\-IP.activaterl K+ channel in Drosophila larval muscle
`is persistently activated in dunce. Prn<.:. Null. A i:uu. Si:i. USA 88:
`557- fifiO, 1991.
`6. Dennis, T., A. Founier, A. Cadieux, :F, Pomerleau, F. B.
`Jolicoeur, S. S. Pierre, and R. Quirion. hCGT{)--'8-37, a
`calcitnnin ge ne-Te hated peptide antagonist revealing calcitonin
`
`gene·relaLed peptide re~eptor heterogeneity in brain and periph(cid:173)
`ery. J. Pharnwcol. Exp. The,: 254: 123-128, 1990.
`7. Edvinsson, L. Functionnl role of perivascular peptides in the
`control of cerebral circulation. T'rends Neurosci. 8: 126- 13 1,
`1985.
`8. Ed vims.sun, L., R. Ekman, I. Jansen, J. McCulloch, and R.
`Uddman. Cnlcitonin genfHelf!teil peptiilf' ::inn ce1•phr::il hloo<l
`vasscls: distribution and vn~ornotor effects. J. Cereb. Blood Flow
`Metab. 7: nu-n8, 1987.
`9. Edwards, R. M., E. J. Stack, and W. Tril7.na. Calcitonin
`gene-related peptide stimulates aclenylat.e cyclase and relaxes
`intracerebral arterioles. J . Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 257: 1020-
`1024, 1991.
`10. Gelband, C. H., N, J. Lodge, and C. van Breemen. A
`Cu2 ' ucLivuLcd K' chunncl from rabbit oortn: modula tion by
`cromakalim. Eur. J. Pharm.acol. 167: 201-210, 1989.
`11. Gimenez-Gallego, G., M.A. Navia, J.P. Reuben, G. M, Katz,
`G. J. Kaczorowski, and M. L. Garcia. Purification, sequence,
`and model structure of charybdotoxin, a potent Relf'ctivf' inhihi(cid:173)
`Lor of c<ikium-activated potassium channels . Proc. Natl. Acad.
`Sci. USA 85: 3329- :1:13:1, 1988.
`12. Grace, G. C., G. J. Dusting, P. E. Kemp, and T. ,J. Martin.
`EndoLhelium and the vasodilator action of rat calcitonin gene(cid:173)
`related peptide /CGRPI. B1: ,!. Pharmrwol. 91: 729-7:l::l, 1987.
`13. Hiramatsu, T., H. Kumc, M. I. Kotlikoff, and K. Takagi. Role
`of calcium.activated potassium channels in the relaxation of
`tracheal Emooth muscles by forskolin. Clin. Exp. i'harmacol.
`Phyliiol. 21: 367-375, 1994.
`H . Hong, K. W., K. M. Pyo, W.R. 1..,,.,,, !,;_ !,;. Yn , :,n<l R. Y. Rhim.
`Phannacological evidence that cakitonin gene-related peptide is
`implicated in cerebral autoregulation.Am. J. Physio/. 266 (Heart
`Circ. l'hys:iol. 3S): H11 - H16, 1994.
`15. Kajioka, s., M. Nakashima, K. Kitamura, and H. Kuriyama.
`MechaniRtnR of vaRodilat.at.ion ind ncP.d hy pot.:assium channel
`activators. Clin. Sci. Land. 81: 129-1.39, 1991.
`16. Kita:r.ono, T., n. D. Heistad, and I<'. M . .t·araci. Kole of
`Al'P-sensitive K + channels in CGRP.induced dilatation of basi(cid:173)
`lar arLery in vivo . . 4.m. J. Phvsiol. 265 (Heart Cin:. I'hvsiol. :14):
`ll581-Hii85. 199::l.
`.
`,
`.17. l{ubota, M., J.M. Moseley, L. Dutet·a, G. J. Dusting, P. S.
`MacDonald, and T. J. Martin. Calcitonin gene-related peptide
`,;timulates cyclic AlvIP formation in rnt aortic smooth muscle
`cells. Riochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 132: 88- 94, 198G.
`18. T .4'!P, W. 8., Y .. J. Kwon, S.S. Yu, R. Y. Rhim, and K. W. Hong.
`Disturbance in autorcgulatory responses of rat pial arteries by
`sulfonylureas. Life Sr.i. 52: 1527-1534, 1993.
`19. McCarron, J. G., ,J. M. Quayle, W. Halpern, and M. T.
`Nelson. Cromakalim and pinacidil dilate small mesenteric
`mtAries but not small cerebral arteries. Am. J. Phv.~iol. 261
`Ulea,·t Circ. Physiol. 30): Il287-Il291

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket