throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`V.
`
`SANOFI-AVENTIS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2018-01676
`
`Patent No. 8,603,044
`
`PETITIONER’S UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`

`

`
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`Description
`
`1001
`
`U S. Patent 8,679,069, Pen-Type Injector (issued Mar 25 2014)
`
`1002
`
`1003
`
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`US. Patent 8,603,044, Pen Type Injector (issued Dec. 10, 2013)
`
`US. Patent 8,992,486, Pen Type Injector (issued Mar. 31, 2015)
`
`US. Patent 9,526,844, Pen Type Injector (issued Dec. 27, 2016)
`
`US. Patent 9,604,008, Drive Mechanisms Suitablefor Use in Drug
`
`Delivery Devices (issued Mar. 28, 2017)
`
`File History for US. Patent 8,679,069
`
`File History for US. Patent 8,603,044
`
`File History for US. Patent 8,992,486
`
`File History for U S Patent 9 526,844
`
`File History for US Patent 9,604 008
`
`
`
`Expert Declaration of Karl Leinsing MSME, PE in Support of
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of US. Patent Nos. 8,679,069;
`
`8,603,044; 8,992,486; 9,526,844 and 9,604,008
`
`1012
`
`Curriculum Vitae of Karl Leinsing MSME,PE
`
`1013
`
`US. Patent 6,221,046 - A. Burroughs et al., “Recyclable Medication
`Dispensing Device” (issued Apr. 24, 2001)
`
`US. Patent 6,235,004 — S. Steenfeldt—Jensen & S. Hansen, “Injection
`
`Syringe” (issued May 22, 2001)
`
`US. Patent Application US 2002/0053578 A1 — C.S. Muller, “Injection
`
`Device” (pub’d May 2, 2002)
`
`

`

`
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`Description
`
`U.S. Patent 6,932,794 B2 — L. Giambattista & A. Bendek,
`
`1016
`
`“Medication Delivery Pen” (issued Aug. 23, 2005)
`
`U.S. Patent 6,582,404 B1 — P.C. Klitgaard et al., “Dose Setting
`
`1017
`
`Limiter” (issued June 24, 2003)
`
`1018
`
`File History for U.S. Patent 6,582,404
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs’ Preliminary Claim Constructions and Preliminary
`
`Identification of Supporting Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evidence,
`
`Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC v. Mylan GmbH, N0. 2:17-cv-09105
`
`(D.N.J.) (filed Sep. 5 2018)
`
`U.S. Patent 4,865,591 — B. Sams, “Measured Dose Dispensing
`
`Device” (issued Sep. 12, 1989)
`
`U.S. Patent 6,248,095 B1 — L. Giambattista et al., “Low-cost
`
`Medication Delivery Pen” (issued June 19, 2001)
`
`U.S. Patent 6,921,995 B1 — A.A. Bendek et al., “Medication
`
`Delivery Pen Having An Improved Clutch Assembly” (issued
`
`July 13, 1999)
`
`U.S. Patent 5,226,895 — D.C. Harris, “Multiple Dose Injection Pen”
`
`(issued July 13, 1993)
`
`U.S. Patent 5,851,079 — R.L. Horstman et al., “Simplified
`
`Unidirectional Twist-Up Dispensing Device With Incremental
`
`Dosing” (issued Dec. 22, 1998)
`
`Application as filed: U.S. Patent App. 14/946,203 — R.F. Veasey,
`
`“Relating to a Pen-Type Injector” (filed Nov. 19, 2015)
`
`GB 03 04822.0 — “Improvements in and relating to a pen-type
`
`injector” (filed Mar. 3, 2003) (‘844 Priority Doc.)
`
`

`

`
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`mm
`
`WO 99/3 8554 — S.Steenfeldt-Jensen & S.Hansen, “An Injection
`
`Syringe” (pub’d Aug. 5, 1999) (Steenfeldt-Jensen PCT)
`
`Mylan GmbH and Biocon’s Preliminary Claim Constructions and
`
`Supporting Evidence Pursuant to L. Pat. R. 4.2, Sanofi-Aventis
`
`US, LLC v. Mylan N. V., CA. No. 17-cv-09105 (filed Sep. 5,
`
`2018)
`
`Memorandum Opinion, Sanofi-Aventis US. LLC v. Merck Sharp &
`
`Dohme Corp., No. 16-cv-812 (filed Jan. 12, 2018)
`
`Memorandum Opinion, Sanofi -Aventis US. LLC v. Eli Lilly and
`
`Co., No. 14-cv-113 (filed Jan. 20, 2015)
`
`N. Sclater & N.P. Chironis, Mechanisms & Mechanical Devices
`
`Sourcebook 191-95, “Twenty Screw Devices” (3d ed., July 2,
`
`
`
`2001)
`
`EP 0 608 343 B1 — L. Petersen & N.-A. Hansen, “Large Dose Pen”
`
`(pub’d Oct. 18, 1991)
`
`A.G. Erdman &G.N. Sandor, “ Mechanical Advantage”, §3.7 in
`
`1 Mechanism Design: Analysis and Synthesis (1984)
`
`WO 01/83008 — S. Hansen & T.D. Miller., “An Injection Device, A
`
`Preassembled Dose Setting And Injection Mechanism For An
`
`Injection Device, And A Method OfAssembling An Injection
`
`Device” (pub’d Nov. 8, 2001)
`
`K]. Lipska et al., Association ofInitiation ofBasal Insulin Analogs
`
`vs Neutral Protamine Hagedorn Insulin With Hypoglycemia-
`
`Related Emergency Department Visits or Hospital Admissions
`
`and With Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes,
`
`

`

`
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`Description
`
`_ 320 J. Am. Med. Ass’n 53-62 (2018) 1 03 6
`
`Transcript, Conference Call (January 1 5, 20 19)
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2018-01676
`
`Patent No. 8,603,044
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that on 22 January 2019 a true and correct copy of this Updated
`
`Exhibit List and EX1036 were served on the patent owner at the email
`
`correspondence addresses of the patent owner as follows:
`
`Elizabeth Stotland Weiswasser
`
`elizabeth.weiswasser@weil.com
`
`Anish R. Desai
`
`anish.desai@weil.com
`
`Kathryn M. Kantha
`
`kat
`
`.kantha weil.com
`
`William S. Ansley
`
`sutton.ansley@weil.com
`
`Matthew D. Sieger
`
`matthew.sieger@weil.com
`
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP Sanofi.IPR.Service@weil.com
`
`Date: 22 January 2019
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/ Richard Torczon /
`Richard Torczon, Lead Counsel
`
`Reg. No. 34,448
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket