throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and PFIZER INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`SANOFI-AVENTIS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`Case IPR2018-01675
`U.S. Patent No. 8,603,044
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Pfizer Inc., who filed petition in IPR2019-00977, has been joined as petitioner in
`
`this proceeding.
`
`
`
`

`

`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s Scheduling Order, Patent
`
`Owner respectfully submits this Request for Oral Argument. The Board has
`
`currently scheduled the oral hearing in IPR2018-01675 for January 14-15, 2020.
`
`Patent Owner specifies the following issues to be argued:
`
`• The instituted ground of unpatentability in this proceeding: Ground 1
`
`(alleged obviousness of claims 11, 14, 15, 18, and 19 by Burroughs);
`
`• Patent Owner’s List of Improper Reply Arguments (Paper 63);
`
`• Any issues raised in Motions to Exclude; and
`
`• Any other issues the Board deems necessary for issuing a final written
`
`decision.
`
`The parties have conferred and agree to a combined three-hour hearing in
`
`IPR2018-01670, IPR2018-01675, IPR2018-01676, IPR2018-01678, IPR2018-
`
`01684, and IPR2019-00122. Patent Owner hereby requests a combined hearing in
`
`IPR2018-01670, IPR2018-01675, IPR2018-01676, IPR2018-01678, IPR2018-
`
`01684, and IPR2019-00122, to be held in the afternoon on January 14, 2020. Patent
`
`Owner further requests ninety minutes of total time to address the issues identified
`
`in Patent Owner’s Requests for Oral Argument in these IPRs. To the extent the
`
`Board schedules the combined hearing to last more than three hours, however, Patent
`
`Owner requests that it be given half the length of the hearing to address all issues
`
`raised in these proceedings.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Patent Owner requests that ten spaces be reserved at the oral hearing to
`
`accommodate its counsel and corporate representatives.
`
`
`
`Dated: November 19, 2019
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/Elizabeth Stotland Weiswasser/
`Elizabeth Stotland Weiswasser
`Reg. No. 55,721
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`767 Fifth Avenue
`New York, NY 10153
`T: 212-310-8000
`E: elizabeth.weiswasser@weil.com
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`3
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on November 19, 2019, the foregoing
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served via
`electronic mail, upon the following:
`Richard Torczon
`Wesley Derryberry
`Tasha Thomas
`Lora Green
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`1700 K Street NW, 5th Floor
`Washington, D.C. 20006
`rtorczon@wsgr.com
`wderryberry@wsgr.com
`tthomas@wsgr.com
`lgreen@wsgr.com
`
`Douglas H. Carsten
`Jeffrey W. Guise
`Arthur Dykhuis
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`12235 El Camino Real, Suite 200
`San Diego, CA 92130
`dcarsten@wsgr.com
`jguise@wsgr.com
`adykhuis@wsgr.com
`
`Lorelei Westin
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`lwestin@wsgr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Nicole W. Stafford
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`900 South Capital of Texas Highway
`Las Cimas, IV Fifth Floor
`Austin, TX 78746
`nstafford@wsgr.com
`
`Elham F. Steiner (Pro Hac Vice)
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`12235 El Camino Real
`San Diego CA 92130
`esteiner@wsgr.com
`
`Jad Mills
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104
`jmills@wsgr.com
`
`Jovial Wong
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`1700 K Street, NW
`Washington, D.C. 20006
`jwong@winston.com
`
`/Lauren J. McDuffie/
`Lauren J. McDuffie
`IP Paralegal
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`2001 M Street, NW, Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20036
`Lauren.mcduffie@weil.com
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket