throbber
8/6/2019
`
`Sanofi's SoloStar hits US market despite patent suit
`
`Sano's SoloStar hits US market despite patent suit
`By Anna Lewcock
`30-Jul-2007 - Last updated on 19-Jul-2008 at 16:56 GMT
`
`RELATED TAGS: Sano-aventis, Insulin glargine, Sano
`
`Sano-Aventis' disposable insulin pen SoloStar has been launched
`across the US for use with the company's 24-hour basal insulin
`Lantus (insulin glargine), despite patent infringement claims
`emanating from fellow insulin pen manufacturer, Novo Nordisk.
`
`The disposable pen was rolled out in France and Germany earlier this year, but a cloud formed over the
`company's US plans for the product when reports emerged that Danish rm Novo had led a patent
`infringement suit against the company to prevent the pen's availability on the US market. On July 10 Novo led
`a suit with the US District Court of New Jersey against Sano with regard to the Lantus SoloStar product, but
`Sano has yet to be ocially served with the complaint, and says it's understanding of the allegations is still
`preliminary. Novo's allegations pertain to the mechanisms for injection and dose-setting, features which
`Sano emphasises as advantages of its product but which Novo claims infringe on its NovoPen 4 insulin
`delivery system. Sano states that the dose-setting mechanism on the Lantus SoloStar is somewhat unique, in
`that it is the only pre-lled disposable insulin pen that allows patients to administer from one up to 80 units in
`single-unit increments with a single injection. The pen oers a 25 per cent higher capacity than other insulin
`pens, according to the company, capable of holding 300 units of insulin. The average Lantus dose is 35 units a
`day. Sano also highlights the reduced injection force used with its SoloStar product, with the pressure
`required to administer the insulin 31 per cent less than Novo's FlexPen device and 54 per cent less than Eli
`Lilly's Humulin/Humalog pen. A further advantage of the Lantus version of the pen product is that Lantus is
`currently the only 24-hour insulin approved exclusively for once-daily treatment of hyperglycaemia in patients
`with Type I or Type II diabetes. It also eliminates the problem of the 'peak-of-action' eect common with other
`insulins, where the insulin reaches a point of maximum eect in the body. Lantus, on the other hand, has no
`such pronounced peak and is released into the bloodstream at a relatively constant rate throughout the day.
`The cost of the pen on the US market is similar to other pen format analog insulins, according to Julissa Viana
`of Sano, coming in at around 10 cents a unit or $30 (€22) per injection device. With insulin pens still
`somewhat under-utilised in the US compared to other regions such as Europe and Japan, Sano will be hoping
`to wean the American diabetic population onto the SoloStar pen, emphasising its ease of use and convenience
`over traditional needle-based injection systems. Although reluctant to disclose information regarding the
`potential share of the market that the company could garner with the Lantus SoloStar product, Viana said that
`Sano does "feel condent that [it] will increase the percentage of patients initiating on Lantus in pen format above
`the national average of 12-14 per cent over the next two years." The company is also awaiting approval for the use
`of the SoloStar pen with Apidra (insulin glulisine), the company's fast-acting prandial insulin. Until approval is
`granted, Apidra will be continue to be available with the company's reusable insulin pen, OptiClik, which will
`This website uses cookies. By continuing to browse our website, you are
`I Agree
`also remain available for use with Lantus should patients prefer a reusable pen option.
`agreeing to our use of cookies. You can learn more about cookies by visiting
`our privacy & cookies policy page.
`
`https://www.in-pharmatechnologist.com/Article/2007/07/31/Sanofi-s-SoloStar-hits-US-market-despite-patent-suit
`
`1/2
`
`Mylan Ex.1080
`Mylan v. Sanofi - IPR2018-01675
`
`

`

`Sanofi's SoloStar hits US market despite patent suit
`8/6/2019
`Copyright - Unless otherwise stated all contents of this web site are © 2019 - William Reed Business Media Ltd - All Rights
`Reserved - Full details for the use of materials on this site can be found in the Terms & Conditions
`
`RELATED TOPICS: Drug Delivery, Delivery technologies
`
`This website uses cookies. By continuing to browse our website, you are
`agreeing to our use of cookies. You can learn more about cookies by visiting
`our privacy & cookies policy page.
`
`I Agree
`
`https://www.in-pharmatechnologist.com/Article/2007/07/31/Sanofi-s-SoloStar-hits-US-market-despite-patent-suit
`
`2/2
`
`Mylan Ex.1080
`Mylan v. Sanofi - IPR2018-01675
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket