throbber
rJUCTION AND WEAR
`oF MATERIALS
`-----
`
`second Edition
`
`ERNEST RABINOWICZ
`
`A Wiley~Interscience Publication
`JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC.
`• Brisbane
`New y k or
`• Chichester
`
`• Toronto
`
`• Singapore
`
`Sanofi Exhibit 2212.001
`Mylan v. Sanofi
`IPR2018-01675
`
`

`

`'l'hls tt~t Is t r,nttxl on it ·ltl•l't'-~ 1-mt 1\
`Copy~ht c J99 h)' John WH~}1 t'l Stm~, lut,
`All ~hts roscl'\'td, Puhllsh~I slnmht\tKll.mNQ In
`Rcprodu\ition ~)t tnmslath.m of uny p:.111. ,f ,his wtwk hl'i~~11d
`thil pcnnlll\XI bv s~11,,n lO
`\if IOii llf th~ 19 Cl Unll'cd
`States opy,~ht A~t ~ lht)UI the permission if th~ l'OP, ,,~ht
`owner Is unlawl\1l. R~uc.sls ibr pcrmls~lon t)f t\uth~1'
`lnfurm;1tlon shunl I ~ 1duressed tu th~ I m1hisim,s Oupmtm~nt,
`John Wik. & Soll!i, ln~,
`
`irnadu,
`
`i'hls publkntl(m is tksig11t'<l I:\) pt\Wkl~ ut ·u1~1tc 1tni..l
`lllllhlJl'.tl~ll\?'C lnfom\aliOH In ~ijl\N hl th\? S\lt\)~ t
`mnncr t'O\!C~ . II is solJ \\ith the ui1,l~l'!ltnndh~ ttMt
`the publisher Is rot ~~:~\ if\ t'tni.lei~n~
`professional ~-crvk~s, If lt>~t\l advk Of llth~f ex_~tt i\~lsli\lK~
`is rcquimt, th, ~tf\'t s of I l'Ofllllet nt pt\,r-~~s \)l\11l
`pcn,-on should be sou~ht,

`··
`
`Ubrttey of l'Mf~SS Ctatnlc,gi',t.~N~'MMt tim, /Mm.•
`R.tbim:lwia. 1n~,'t,
`Fri 'I.ion ind \\lc.}l\t' r l\l;\ttrinli; I t m ciit Q.11Nnowk
`p,
`~in.
`rneludei;. lndc..'l,
`,,lk, tm\X't
`l-ijJOS4 -4
`lSBN t)
`. , Frb'
`· ,1
`L Mn~rit1ls,
`.
`.
`. I 5 it,n,
`sl , MC\:h:ink:11 " ·1r,
`1'A403,6, R:ti
`ti20,l' l~9~- tk20
`'
`
`, -
`
`ml cd,
`
`t 1tl·-.
`
`Sanofi Exhibit 2212.002
`Mylan v. Sanofi
`IPR2018-01675
`
`

`

`68
`
`FRICTION
`
`0.3
`
`E 0.2
`E
`.5
`
`0.1
`
`L= 300g
`P= 200g
`
`20
`Time
`Fig. 4.3 Displacement-time cuive for steel on indium, unlubricated.
`
`10
`
`30
`
`40 days
`
`variables: the applied load, the size of the region of contact, and the sliding
`velocity. The three quantitative relations are as follows:
`
`1. The friction force F is proportional to the nonnal force L:
`
`F =fl.
`
`(4.1)
`
`178°
`
`1so0
`
`1a2•
`
`steel
`so
`o
`•
`200 mm
`.
`100
`150
`. . direcuon,
`.
`Fig. 4.4 Di r
`on steel l
`r:ec mn of the fnction force as measured from the shdmg
`' ubncated by a machine oil. Load 1000 g velocity 50 mm/sec.
`
`Sanofi Exhibit 2212.003
`Mylan v. Sanofi
`IPR2018-01675
`
`

`

`4.2 QUANTITATIVE LAWS OF SLIDING FRICTION
`
`69
`
`""-is relationship enables us to define a coefficient f f . .
`'u
`. .
`ft
`o nct1on f (o
`)
`.
`Allematively, 1t 1s o en convenient to express this 1
`r µ. •
`aw m tenns of
`.
`f
`l
`fri
`cuonal angle 8 defined by
`constant ang e o repose, or
`a
`
`tan 8 = f.
`
`(4.2)
`It may readily be shown that 8 is the angle of an inclined pl
`h

`h


`ane sue
`that
`any obJect, w atever its weight, placed on the plane will re
`.
`•
`· f th
`mam station-
`l
`· ·
`ary, but that 1
`e ang e 1s mcreased by any amount whatever th b'
`, e o ~ect
`(F' 4 S)
`• d
`will slide own
`.
`.
`1g.
`2. The friction force is independent of the apparent area of contact A Th
`h
`all b.
`us
`a·
`large and sm
`o ~ects ave the same coefficients of friction.
`3. The friction force is independent of the sliding velocity v. This implies
`that the force required to initiate sliding will be the same as the force to
`maintain sliding at any specified velocity.
`
`Taken together, these three laws provide the quantitative framework within
`which friction is generally considered by engineers. It is therefore important
`to discover how closely these laws apply in actual practice.
`The first two quantitative laws are generally well obeyed, to within a few
`percent in most cases (Figs. 4.6, 4.7). Exceptions to the first of them occur
`mostly with very hard materials like diamond or very soft materials like Teflon
`(Fig. 4.8) or at loads down to the milligram range (Rabinowicz 1992). In many
`cases sliding combinations involving materials such as these obey a law of the
`kind
`
`(4.3)
`
`where c is a constant and x a fraction varying somewhere in the range from i
`to 1. Naturally, in cases where the first law is obeye~, x is exactly l ..
`Another case where the friction force is not proportional to the load mvolv~s
`a surface with a thin hard surface layer and a softer substrate. At 1?w loads 1 _e
`f · t' on properties predom1-
`d ·
`.
`h rd
`thin surface layer remains unbroken, an
`a
`its nc i
`
`\
`
`\
`
`w
`
`\L
`.
`Fi
`g. 4·5 Equilibrium diagram for an obJect on
`Plane·

`16 imminent.
`
`F= W sin6
`L= Wcos6
`E.= t= tan6
`L
`
`e down the
`l.
`an inclined plane. S ippag
`
`Sanofi Exhibit 2212.004
`Mylan v. Sanofi
`IPR2018-01675
`
`

`

`. -. ' .
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`h
`(l SO)
`11\H\,lllU"'
`UI \1 ·~ ·t:e(t
`
`l
`
`10~
`
`10•
`
`,
`
`"'
`
`• ~ c \-
`
`, ~
`
`.. surfa ,. \~ er is hro~--en through, tmd the properties l)f
`i 1portant Fig. 4. ).

`t
`~ nd qn~mtimtive la'. , which st<.ites that friction i~
`, re t re~ f · nttl~t, are s metirnes n ted in very sm()Qth
`.
`. nditions very trong interaction betw~n
`s ,,. ~-
`nde.r the
`..
`.\!,.; . . . ,~ .... ·,~ u, ~~ pl ~. nd th~ fri ti n furce becomes independent of th"" lood
`lere-1~ m the 3P~1rent area of conta t "hich has become the
`· "nsl
`~~---~"'" • Sucll cases are dis ussed Inter.
`ph sired that th first and s
`nd qunntitati e laws are gen-
`yro and th t pron , unced e."Xception
`to them are rarities.
`·oi _re si m1ti n where if w chanooe the load or the area by a
`fficient hanges by a fuctor of 10 or less. Rather
`fricti n
`,
`'"' J)(r · · n f the thiro law which suites that friction is independent
`

`
`~ ·
`
`.....
`
`t i~
`
`·--__,,;-----------
`•
`•
`
`Wood on steel
`unlubricated, L • 30 g
`
`0 --.a. __ ---1. __ --1, __ ___,J~---'
`/64
`1/ 16
`1/4
`1
`4
`Area, sq in.
`. 1 l1
`Tbe_ e~ of changes in contact area on the friction of wood 00 st
`ee ·
`·-=..uu ,-an-s.n n is found.
`
`Sanofi Exhibit 2212.005
`Mylan v. Sanofi
`IPR2018-01675
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket