`
`FALLON et al.
`Application No. 14/876,276
`
`No.
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`Case
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters
`Corporation et al. No. 1:11-cv-06698-RJH (S.D. New
`York) (transferred from E.D. Texas; 6:09-cv-00333-
`LED)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley et al.,
`No. 1:11-cv-06696-RJH (S.D. New York) (transferred
`from E.D. Texas; 6:09-cv-00326-LED)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc., et
`al., No. 1:11-cv-06697-RJH (S.D. New York)
`(transferred from E.D. Texas; No. 6:09-cv-00327-
`LED)
`Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc., v. Realtime
`Data LLC d/b/a IXO, No. 09-cv-4486 (N.D. Ill.)
`Thomson Reuters Corporation v. Realtime Data, LLC
`d/b/a IXO, No. 1:09-cv-07868-RMB (S.D.N.Y)
`Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc., et
`al. (II), No. 6:10-cv-246 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters
`Corporation et al. (II), No. 6:10-cv-247 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et
`al. (II), No. 6:10-cv-248 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. MetroPCS Texas,
`LLC et al., No. 6:10-cv-00493 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Microsoft
`Corporation, et al., No. 4:14-cv-00827 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Actian Corporation,
`et al., No. 6:15-cv-00463 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Dropbox, Inc., No.
`6:15-cv-00465 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Echostar
`Corporation, et al., No. 6:15-cv-00466 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Riverbed
`Technology, Inc., et al., No. 6:15-cv-00468 (E.D.
`Texas)
`Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. BMC Software, Inc.,
`No. 6:15-cv-00464 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Oracle America, Inc.,
`et al., No. 6:15-cv-00467 (E.D. Texas)
`
`Status
`Case Terminated 11/9/2012;
`Opinion of the Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit received
`01/27/2014
`Ca Terminated 11/9/2012;
`o fopritnhie -1 olF ed of etrhael CC Court it o fr eAc epipveeadl s
`
`01/27/2014
`Case Terminated 11/9/2012;
`Opinion of the Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit received
`01/27/2014
`
`Dismissed
`
`Consolidated with Case No. 2
`
`Consolidated with Case No. 4
`
`Consolidated with Case No. 2
`
`Consolidated with Case No. 3
`
`Appeal Terminated
`
`Dismissed 5/1/2015
`
`Order to submit claim
`constructions 4/10/2017
`Dismissed 2/22/2016
`
`Consolidated with Case No. 12
`
`Consolidated with Case No. 12
`
`Terminated 10/5/ 2015
`
`Consolidated with Case No. 22
`
`Atty. Dkt. No. 3421.005000C
`
`Page 1260
`
`NETFLIX, INC
`Exhibit 1002
`IPR2018-01630
`
`
`
`-7
`
`FALLON et al.
`Application No. 14/876,276
`
`No.
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`29
`
`30
`
`31
`
`32
`
`33
`
`34
`
`35
`
`36
`
`Case
`Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. SAP America, Inc., et
`al., No. 6:15-cv-00469 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Teradata
`Corporation, et al., No. 5:16-cv-01836 (N.D. Cal.)
`(transferred from E.D. Texas; 6:15-cv-00470)
`Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Apple Inc., No. 3:16-
`cv-02595 (transferred from E.D. Texas; 6:15-cv-
`00885)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Hewlett Packard
`Enterprise Co., et al., No. 6:16-cv-00086 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Oracle America, Inc.,
`No. 6:16-cv-00088 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. CenturyLink, Inc., et
`al., No. 6:16-cv-00087 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Dell, Inc., et al., No.
`6:16-cv-00089 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Teradata Operations,
`Inc., No. 2:16-cv-02743 (C.D. Cal.)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Rackspace US, Inc.,
`et al., No. 6:16-cv-00961 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Fujitsu America, Inc.
`et al., No. 6:16-cv-01035 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Vembu Technologies,
`Inc., No. 6:16-cv-01037 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Oracle America, Inc.,
`No. 6:17-cv-00046 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Echostar Corporation
`et al., No. 6:17-cv-00084 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Acronis, Inc., No.
`6:17-cv-00118 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Array Networks, Inc.,
`No. 6:17-cv-00119 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Barracuda Networks,
`Inc., No. 6:17-cv-00120 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Carbonite, Inc. et al.,
`No. 6:17-cv-00121 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Circadence
`Corporation, No. 6:17-cv-00122 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. CommVault Systems,
`Inc. et al., No. 6:17-cv-00123 (E.D. Texas)
`
`Status
`Consolidated with Case No. 12
`
`Case dismissed 5/18/2016
`
`Stayed pending inter partes
`review 3/27/2017
`
`Transferred to N.D. California
`— Case No. 42
`Final Judgment all claims
`dismissed 5/15/2017
`Stayed pending inter partes
`review 3/1/2017
`Stayed pending inter partes
`review 2/7/2017
`Stayed pending inter partes
`review 2/25/2017
`Motion to Stay denied
`4/24/2017
`Transferred to N.D. California
`— Case No. 41
`Consolidated with Case No. 26
`
`Final Judgment case dismissed
`5/8/2017
`Amended complaint 6/6/2017
`
`Filed 2/27/2017
`
`Filed 2/27/2017
`
`Answer to Complaint
`4/24/2017
`Answer and counterclaim
`5/9/2017
`Final Judgment case dismissed
`4/25/2017
`Amended complaint 5/18/2017
`
`Atty. Dkt. No. 3421.005000C
`
`Page 1261
`
`
`
`8
`
`FALLON et al.
`Application No. 14/876,276
`
`No.
`37
`
`38
`
`39
`
`40
`
`41
`
`42
`
`43
`
`44
`
`45
`
`46
`
`47
`
`48
`
`Case
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Exinda Inc., No. 6:17-
`cv-00124 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. NETGEAR, Inc., No.
`6:17-cv-00125 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Synacor Inc., No.
`6:17-cv-00126 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Riverbed Technology,
`Inc., No. 6:17-cv-00198 (E.D. Texas)
`Realtime Data LLC v. Fujitsu America, Inc. et al., No.
`3:17-cv-02109 (N.D. Cal.)
`Realtime Data LLC v. Silver Peak Systems, Inc., No.
`4:17-cv-02373 (N.D. Cal.)
`Realtime Data LLC v. Riverbed Technology, Inc., No.
`3:17-cv-03182 (N.D. Cal.)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Array Networks Inc.,
`No. 1:17-cv-00800 (D. Del.)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Barracuda Networks,
`Inc., No. 1:17-cv-00893 (D. Del.)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Comm Vault Systems,
`Inc., No. 1:17-cv-00925 (D. Del.)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Acronis, Inc., No.
`1:17-cv-11279 (D. Mass.)
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. DISH Network
`Corporation et al., 6:17-cv-00421 (E.D. Texas)
`
`Information Disclosure Statement
`
`Status
`Amended answer to Complaint
`5/30/2017
`Amended answer to Complaint
`5/30/2017
`Answer to Complaint 5/5/2017
`
`Filed 4/3/2017
`
`Transferred in from E.D.
`Texas 4/17/2017
`Transferred in from E.D.
`Texas 4/26/2017
`Filed 6/2/2017
`
`Filed 6/21/2017
`
`Filed 7/5/2017
`
`Filed 7/10/2017
`
`Filed 7/12/2017
`
`Case severed from 6:17-cv-84
`7/19/2017
`
`Listed on accompanying IDS Forms PTO/SB/08a equivalent and/or PTO/SB/08b equivalent
`
`are documents that may be considered material to the patentability of this application as defined in
`
`37 C.F.R. §1.56, and in compliance with the duty of disclosure requirements of 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.97
`
`and 1.98.
`
`Where the publication date of a listed document does not provide a month of publication, the
`
`year of publication of the listed document is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date
`
`and any foreign priority date so that the month of publication is not in issue. Applicant has listed
`
`Atty. Dkt. No. 3421.005000C
`
`Page 1262
`
`
`
`- 9
`
`FALLON et a/.
`Application No. 14/876,276
`
`publication dates on the attached IDS Forms based on information presently available to the
`
`undersigned. However, the listed publication dates should not be construed as an admission that the
`
`information was actually published on the date indicated.
`
`Applicant reserves the right to establish the patentability of the claimed invention over any
`
`of the information provided herewith, and/or to prove that this information may not be prior art,
`
`and/or to prove that this information may not be enabling for the teachings purportedly offered.
`
`This statement should not be construed as a representation that a search has been made, or
`
`that information more material to the examination of the present patent application does not exist.
`
`The Examiner is specifically requested not to rely solely on the material submitted herewith.
`
`Filing under 37 C.F.R. § 1.97(e)(2). No item of information contained in the IDS was cited
`
`in a communication from a foreign patent office in a counterpart foreign application, and, to the
`
`knowledge of the person signing the certification after making reasonable inquiry, no item of
`
`information contained in the IDS was known to any individual designated in 37 CFR 1.56(c) more
`
`than three months prior to the filing of the IDS. In addition:
`
`Statement under 37 C.F.R. § 1.97(e)(2). I hereby state that no item of information in this
`
`Information Disclosure Statement was cited in a communication from a foreign patent office in a
`
`counterpart foreign application and, to my knowledge after making reasonable inquiry, was known
`
`to any individual designated in 37 C.F.R. § 1.56(c) more than three months prior to the filing of this
`
`Information Disclosure Statement. 37 C.F.R. § 1.97(e)(2).
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 1.98(a)(2)(ii), no copies of U.S. patents and patent
`
`application publications cited as documents US1-US15 on the attached IDS Forms are submitted.
`
`Atty. Dkt. No. 3421.005000C
`
`Page 1263
`
`
`
`- 10 -
`
`FALLON et al.
`Application No. 14/876,276
`
`Copies of the FP1 and NPL1-NPL57 documents were cited by or submitted to the Office in
`
`an IDS that complies with 37 C.F.R. § 1.98(a)-(c) in Application No. 14/733,565, filed June 8, 2015
`
`(now pending), which is relied upon for an earlier filing date under 35 U.S.C. § 120. Thus, copies of
`
`these documents are not attached. 37 C.F.R. § 1.98(d).
`
`It is expected that the examiner will review the prosecution and cited art in the parent
`
`application nos. 14/733,565, filed June 8, 2015 (now pending); 14/577,286, filed December 19,
`
`2014 (now abandoned); 14/134,933, filed December 19, 2013 (now U.S. Patent No. 8,929,442);
`
`14/033,245, filed September 20, 2013 (now U.S. Patent No. 8,934,535); 13/154,239, filed June 6,
`
`2011 (now U.S. Patent No. 8,553,759); 12/123,081, filed May 19, 2008 (now U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,073,047); and 10/076,013, filed February 13, 2002 (now U.S. Patent No. 7,386,046), in
`
`accordance with MPEP 2001.06(b), and indicate in the next communication from the office that the
`
`art cited in the earlier prosecution history has been reviewed in connection with the present
`
`application.
`
`In accordance with the Federal Circuit decision in Dayco Prods., Inc. v. Total Containment,
`
`Inc. 329 F.3d 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2003), Applicants submit herewith Office Actions from the co-
`
`pending U.S. Patent Application Nos. 13/875,884, filed May 2, 2013 (now pending); 14/727,309,
`
`filed June 1, 2015 (now pending); 15/382,263, filed December 16, 2016 (now pending); 15/391,240,
`
`filed December 27, 2016 (now pending); and 15/584,865, filed May 2, 2017 (now pending) as
`
`documents NPL7-NPL11.
`
`The identification of these Office Actions is not to be construed as a waiver of secrecy as to
`
`those applications now or upon issuance of the present application as a patent. The Examiner is
`
`Atty. Dkt. No. 3421.005000C
`
`Page 1264
`
`
`
`- 11 -
`
`FALLON et al.
`Application No. 14/876,276
`
`respectfully requested to consider the cited applications and the art cited therein during
`
`examination.
`
`It is respectfully requested that the Examiner initial and return a copy of the enclosed IDS
`
`Forms, and indicate in the official file wrapper of this patent application that the documents have
`
`been considered.
`
`The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby authorized to charge any fee deficiency, or
`
`credit any overpayment, to our Deposit Account No. 19-0036.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`STERNE ESSER, GOLDSTEIN & r OX P.L.L.C.
`
`Mic ael V. Messinger
`Attorney for Applicant
`Registration No. 37,575
`
`Date:
`
`2:1 ) 2d l
`
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`5506109_1.docx
`
`Atty. Dkt. No. 3421.005000C
`
`Page 1265
`
`
`
`Substitute for form 1449/PTO
`TWELFTH SUPPLEMENTAL
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
`STATEMENT BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`1
`of
`1
`
`Sheet
`
`Application Number
`Filing Date
`First Named Inventor
`Art Unit
`Examiner Name
`Attorney Docket Number
`
`Equivalent of Form PTO/SB/08a (07-09
`Complete if Known
`14/876,276
`October 6, 2015
`James J. FALLON
`2634
`BOCURE, Tesfaldet
`3421.005000C
`
`Examiner
`initials*
`
`Cite
`No, 1
`
`Document Number
`
`Number-Kind Code 2 (if
`known)
`US1
`5,265,180
`5,276,898
`US2
`US3
`5,555,377
`5,815,718
`US4
`US5
`5,867,114
`6,658,492 Bl
`US6
`8,832,044 B1
`US7
`8,832,551 B2
`US8
`9,667,751 B2
`US9
`US10
`2007/0083571 Al
`US11 2008/0239917 A 1
`2008/0279462 Al
`US12
`2009/0157712 Al
`US13
`US14
`2011/0023052 A 1
`US15 2012/0124016 Al
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`Publication Date
`MM-DD-YYYY
`
`Name of Patentee or
`Applicant of Cited Document
`
`Pages, Columns, Lines, Where
`Relevant Passages or Relevant Figures Appear
`
`11-23-1993 Golin
`01-04-1994 Kiel et al.
`09-10-1996 Christensen et al.
`09-29-1998 Tock
`02-02-1999 Barbir
`12-02-2003 Kawahara et al.
`09-09-2014 Gipp et al.
`09-09-2014 Muser
`05-30-2017 Fallon et al.
`04-12-2007 Meller et al.
`10-02-2008 Mukaide
`11-13-2008 Celi
`06-18-2009 De Peuter et al.
`01-27-2011 Huang et al.
`05-17-2012 Barsness et al.
`
`Examiner
`initials*
`
`Cite
`N0,1
`
`FP1
`
`Foreign Patent Document
`
`Country Code3-Number4 -
`Kind Code5 (if known)
`WO 02/13058 A2
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`Publication
`Date
`MM-DD-YYYY
`
`Name of Patentee or
`Applicant of Cited Document
`
`Pages, Columns, Lines,
`Where Relevant Passages or
`Relevant Figures Appear
`
`T
`
`02-14-2002 Origin Ltd.
`
`5506112_1.docx
`
`Examiner Signature
`
`Date Considered
`
`*EXAMINER: Initial if reference considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609. Draw line through citation if not in conformance
`and not considered. Include copy of this form with next communication to applicant. Applicant's unique citation designation number (optional). 2 See
`Kinds Codes of USPTO Patent Documents at www.uspto.gov or MPEP 901.04. Enter Office that issued the document, by the two-letter code (WIPO
`Standard ST.3). For Japanese patent documents, the indication of the year of the reign of the Emperor must pretede the serial number of the patent
`document. 5 Kind of document by the appropriate symbols as indicated on the document under WIPO Standard ST.16 if possible. 6 Applicant is to place a
`check mark here if English language Translation is attached.
`
`Page 1266
`
`
`
`Substitute for form 1449/PTO
`TWELFTH SUPPLEMENTAL
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
`STATEMENT BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`1
`of
`6
`
`Sheet
`
`Equivalent of Form PTO/SB/08b (7-09)
`Complete if Known
`Application Number
`14/876,276
`October 6, 2015
`Filing Date
`• First Named Inventor
`James J. FALLON
`2634
`Art Unit
`Examiner Name
`BOCURE, Tesfaldet
`Attorney Docket Number 3421.0050000
`
`NON PATENT LITERATURE DOCUMENTS
`
`Examiner
`Initials*
`
`Cite
`I
`No.
`
`Include name of the author (in CAPITAL LETTERS), title of the article (when
`appropriate), title of the item (book, magazine, journal, serial, symposium, catalog, etc.),
`date, page(s), volume-issue number(s), publisher, city and/or country where published
`
`T2
`
`NPL I
`
`NPL2
`
`NPL3
`
`NPL4
`
`NPLS
`
`NPL6
`
`Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) For Lack of Patentable Subject
`Matter Under 35 U.S.C. § 101, filed in Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Commvault
`Systems, Inc. et al., Case No. 6:17-cv-123 (E.D. Texas), filed June 2, 2017; 27 pages.
`
`Plaintiff Realtime Data LLC's Opposition to Commvault's Motion (DKT. No. 40) to
`Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and Under 35 U.S.C. § 101, filed in
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Commvault Systems, Inc. et al., Case No. 6:17-cv-123
`(E.D. Texas); filed June 19, 2017 27 pages.
`
`Complaint for Patent Infringement Against Array Networks Inc., filed in Realtime Data
`LLC d/b/a IXO v. Array Networks Inc., Case No. 1:17-cv-00800 (D. Delaware), filed
`June 21, 2017; 38 pages.
`
`Complaint for Patent Infringement Against Barracuda Networks Inc., filed in Realtime
`Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Barracuda Networks Inc., Case No. 1:17-cv-00893 (D.
`Delaware), filed July 5, 2017; 115 pages.
`
`Complaint for Patent Infringement against Commvault Systems, Inc. and Spectra Logic
`Corporation, filed in Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. CommVault Systems, Inc. et al.,
`Case No. 1:17-cv-00925 (D. Delaware), filed July 11, 2017; 79 pages.
`
`Complaint for Patent Infringement Against Acronis, Inc., filed in Realtime Data LLC
`d/b/a IXO v. Acronis, Inc., Case No. 1:17-cv-11279 (D. Mass), filed July 12, 2017; 24
`pages.
`
`NPL7
`
`Copy of Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Patent Application No. 14/727,309, mailed
`June 8, 2017; 19 pages.
`
`NPL8
`
`Copy of Final Office Action for U.S. Patent Application No. 15/391,240, mailed June
`16, 2017; 14 pages.
`
`NPL9
`
`Copy of Notice of Allowance for U.S. Patent Application No. 13/875,884, mailed June
`21, 2017; 11 pages.
`
`NPLIO
`
`Copy of Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Patent Application No. 15/584,865, mailed
`June 30, 2017; 6 pages.
`
`Examiner
`Signature
`
`Date
`Considered
`
`*EXAMINER: Initial if reference considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609. Draw line through citation if not in conformance
`and not considered. Include copy of this form with next communication to applicant.
`Applicant's unique citation designation number (optional). 2 Applicant is to place a check mark here if English language Translation is attached.
`
`Page 1267
`
`
`
`Substitute for form 1449/PTO
`TWELFTH SUPPLEMENTAL
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
`STATEMENT BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`2
`of
`6
`
`Sheet
`
`Equivalent of Form PTO/SB/08b (7-09
`Complete if Known
`Application Number
`I 14/876,276
`Filing Date
`October
` 2015
`First Named Inventor
`James J. FALLON
`Art Unit
`2634
`Examiner Name
`BOCURE, Tesfaldet
`Attorney Docket Number 3421.005000C
`
`NON PATENT LITERATURE DOCUMENTS
`
`Examiner
`Initials*
`
`Cite
`No.
`
`Include name of the author (in CAPITAL LETTERS), title of the article (when
`appropriate), title of the item (book, magazine, journal, serial, symposium, catalog,
`pp
`etc.), date, page(s), volume number, publisher, city and/or country where published
`
`T2
`
`NPL11
`
`Copy of Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Patent Application No. 15/382,263, mailed
`July 11, 2017; 9 pages.
`
`NPL12
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review, filed in NetApp, Inc. et al. v. Realtime Data LLC, Case
`No. IPR2017-01663 (P.T.A.B.), filed June 22, 2017; 59 pages.
`
`NPL13
`
`Declaration of Daniel Hirschberg, filed in NetApp, Inc. et al. v. Realtime Data LLC,
`Case No. IPR2017-01663 (P.T.A.B.), filed June 22, 2017; 68 pages.
`
`NPL14
`
`Non-Final Office Action directed to U.S. Patent Application No. 11/400,533, mailed
`July 10, 2007; 7 pages.
`
`NPL15
`
`Declaration of Scott Bennett, Ph.D., filed in NetApp, Inc. et al. v. Realtime Data LLC,
`Case No. IPR2017-01663 (P.T.A.B.), filed June 22, 2017; 16 pages.
`
`NPL16
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review, filed in NetApp, Inc. et al. v. Realtime Data LLC, Case
`No. IPR2017-01660 (P.T.A.B.), filed June 22, 2017; 58 pages.
`
`NPL17
`
`Declaration of Daniel Hirschberg, filed in NetApp, Inc. et al. v. Realtime Data LLC,
`Case No. IPR2017-01660 (P.T.A.B.), filed June 22, 2017; 67 pages.
`
`NPL18
`
`Decision Institution of Inter Panes Review, filed in Veritas Technologies LLC v.
`Realtime Data LLC, Case No. 1PR2017-00365 (P.T.A.B.), filed June 2, 2017; 11 pages.
`
`NPL19
`
`Declaration of Daniel Hirschberg, filed in Rackspace US Inc. v. Realtime Data LLC,
`Case No. IPR2017-01627 (P.T.A.B.), filed June 16, 2017; 63 pages.
`
`NPL20
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,415,530 Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 311-
`319 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.100 et seq., filed in Rackspace US, Inc. v. Realtime Data LLC,
`Case No. IPR2017-01627 (P.T.A.B.), filed June 16, 2017; 75 pages.
`
`Examiner
`Signature
`
`Date
`Considered
`
`*EXAMINER: Initial if reference considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609. Draw line through citation if not in conformance
`and not considered. Include copy of this form with next communication to applicant.
`1 Applicant's unique citation designation number (optional), 2 Applicant is to place a check mark here if English language Translation is attached.
`
`Page 1268
`
`
`
`Substitute for form 1449/PTO
`TWELFTH SUPPLEMENTAL
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
`STATEMENT BY APPLICANT
`((Ise as many sheets as necessary)
`3
`of
`6
`
`Sheet
`
`Equivalent of Form PTO/S[3/08 (7-09
`Complete if Known
`Application Number
`14/876,276
`Filing Date
`October 6, 2015
`Fi • rst Named Inventor
`James J. FALLON
`Art Unit
`2634
`Examiner Name
`BOCURE, Tesfaldet
`Attorney Docket Number 3421.005000C
`
`NON PATENT LITERATURE DOCUMENTS
`
`Examiner
`Initials*
`
`Cite
`No.1
`
`Include name of the author (in CAPITAL LETTERS), title of the article (when
`appropriate), title of the item (book, magazine, journal, serial, symposium, catalog,
`etc.), date, page(s), volume number, publisher, city and/or country where published
`
`T2
`
`NPL21
`
`Declaration of Daniel Hirschberg, filed in Rackspace US Inc. v. Realtime Data LLC,
`Case No. IPR2017-01629 (P.T.A.B.), filed June 16, 2017; 59 pages.
`
`NPL22
`
`NPL23
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 9,116,908 Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 311-
`319 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.100 et seq., filed in Rackspace US, Inc. v. Realtime Data LLC,
`Case No. IPR2017-01629 (P.T.A.B.), filed June 16, 2017; 78 pages.
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review Under 35 U.S.C. § 311-319 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.100 et
`seq., filed in NetApp, Inc. et al. v. Realtime Data LLC, Case No. IPR2017-01664
`(P.T.A.B.), filed June 23, 2017; 74 pages.
`
`NPL24
`
`Declaration of Daniel Hirschberg, filed in NetApp, Inc. et al. v. Realtime Data LLC,
`Case No. 1PR2017-01664 (P.T.A.B.), filed June 23, 2017; 70 pages.
`
`NPL25
`
`Transcript of Deposition of Dr. Godmar Back, filed in Apple Inc. v. Realtime Data LLC,
`Case No. IPR2016-01366 (P.T.A.B.), filed June 27, 2017 98 pages.
`
`NPL26
`
`Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response, filed in Apple Inc. v. Realtime Data
`LLC, Case No. IPR2016-01366 (P.T.A.B.), filed June 27, 2017 36 pages.
`
`NPL27
`
`Excerpt from Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Fifth Edition, Redmond, WA, Microsoft
`Corporation: 2002; p. 192.
`
`NPL28
`
`Excerpt from The Computer Desktop Encyclopedia, Second Edition, Point Pleasant,
`PA, The Computer Language Company Inc.: 1999; p. 300.
`
`NPL29
`
`NPL30
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,161,506, filed in Veritas
`Technologies LLC v. Realtime Data LLC d./b/a IXO, Case No. IPR2017-01688
`(P.T.A.B.), filed June 28, 2017; 57 pages.
`
`Declaration of Charles D. Creusere, Ph.D., filed in Veritas Technologies LLC v.
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO, Case No. IPR2017-01688 (P.T.A.B.), filed June 28,
`2017; 113 pages.
`
`Examiner
`Signature
`
`Date
`Considered
`
`*EXAMINER: Initial if reference considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609. Draw line through citation if not in conformance
`and not considered. Include copy of this form with next communication to applicant.
`Applicant's unique citation designation number (optional). 2 Applicant is to place a check mark here if English language Translation is attached.
`
`Page 1269
`
`
`
`Substitute for form 1449/PTO
`TWELFTH SUPPLEMENTAL
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
`STATEMENT BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`4
`of
`6
`
`Sheet
`
`Equivalent of Form PTO/S13/08b (7-09
`Complete if Known
`Application Number
`14/876,276
`Filing Date
`October 6, 2015
`James J. FALLON
`First Named Inventor
`Art Unit
`2634
`Examiner Name
`BOCURE, Tesfaldet
`Attorney Docket Number 3421.005000C
`
`NON PATENT LITERATURE DOCUMENTS
`
`Examiner
`Initials*
`
`Cite
`No.'
`
`Include name of the author (in CAPITAL LETTERS), title of the article (when
`appropriate), title of the item (book, magazine, journal, serial, symposium, catalog,
`etc.), date, page(s), volume number, publisher, city and/or country where published
`
`T2
`
`NPL31
`
`Amendment Transmittal Form filed in U.S. Patent Application No. 10/668,768, dated
`August 20, 2004; 7 pages.
`
`NPL32
`
`NPL33
`
`NPL34
`
`NPL35
`
`NPL36
`
`NPL37
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 9,054,728, filed in Veritas
`Technologies LLC v. Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO, Case No. IPR2017-01690
`(P.T.A.B.), filed June 28, 2017; 74 pages.
`
`Declaration of Charles D. Creusere, Ph.D., filed in Veritas Technologies LLC v.
`Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO, Case No. IPR2017-01690 (P.T.A.B.), fi led June 28,
`2017; 139 pages.
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,358,867 Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 311-
`319 And 37 C.F.R. § 42.100 et seq., filed in Rackspace US, Inc. v. Realtime Data LLC,
`Case No. IPR2017-01691 (P.T.A.B.), filed June 28, 2017; 64 pages.
`
`Declaration of Dr. Robert Akl, D.S.C. Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.68 (Exhibit #1002), filed in
`Rackspace US, Inc. v. Realtime Data LLC, Case No. IPR2017-01691 (P.T.A.B.), filed
`June 28, 2017; 116 pages.
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,717,204, filed in Commvault
`Systems, Inc. v. Realtime Data LLC, Case No. IPR2017-01710 (P.T.A.B.), filed June 30,
`2017; 81 pages.
`
`Declaration of Professor James Storer, Ph.D., filed in Commvault Systems, Inc. v.
`Realtime Data LLC, Case No. IPR2017-01710 (P.T.A.B.), filed June 30, 2017; 82
`pages.
`
`NPL38
`
`Postel, J., "User Data Protocol," RFC 768, Network Working Group August 28, 1980; 3
`pages.
`
`NPL39
`
`Socolofsky, T., "A TCP/IP Tutorial," RFC 1180, Network Working Group January
`1991; 28 pages.
`
`NPL40
`
`Excerpts from Internetworking With TCP/IP Volume III: Client-Server Programming
`and Applications, Douglas Comer et al., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001;
`pp. 9-21.
`
`Examiner
`Signature
`
`Date
`Considered
`
`*EXAMINER: Initial if reference considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609. Draw line through citation if not in conformance
`and not considered. Include copy of this form with next communication to applicant.
`Applicant's unique citation designation number (optional). 2 Applicant is to place a check mark here if English language Translation is attached.
`
`Page 1270
`
`
`
`Substitute for form 1449/PTO
`TWELFTH SUPPLEMENTAL
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
`STATEMENT BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`6
`of
`5
`
`Sheet
`
`Equivalent of Form PTO/SB/08b (7-09)
`Complete if Known
`14/876,276
`Application Number
`October 6, 2015
`Filing Date
`James J. FALLON
`First Named Inventor
`2634
`Art Unit
`BOCURE, Tesfaldet
`Examiner Name
`Attorney Docket Number 3421.005000C
`
`NON PATENT LITERATURE DOCUMENTS
`
`Examiner
`Initials*
`
`Cite
`No.I
`
`Include name of the author (in CAPITAL LETTERS), title of the article (when
`appropriate), title of the item (book, magazine, journal, serial, symposium, catalog,
`etc.), date, page(s), volume number, publisher, city and/or country where published
`
`T2
`
`NPL41
`
`Excerpts from Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation, John
`Hoperoft et al., Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachussetts, 1979; pp. 13-54.
`
`NPL42
`
`Deskside POWER CHALLENGE and CHALLENGE L Owner's Guide, Silicon
`Graphics, Inc., 1994; 194 pages.
`
`NPL43
`
`Graham, "Trading a Stock vs. Stock Options Part One," Investopedia.com, July 30,
`2003; 3 pages.
`
`NPL44
`
`Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3," RFC 2026, Network
`Working Group October 1996; 36 pages.
`
`NPL45
`
`NPL46
`
`NPL47
`
`Internet Archive version of the web page
`http://www.acm.org:80/pubs/contents/proceedings/mod/342009/, dated August 16,
`2000; 30 pages.
`
`Internet Archive version of the web page
`http://www.cs.purdue.edu:80/homes/comer/netbooks.html, dated December 8, 2000; 7
`pages.
`MyPearsonStore Webpage for Internetworking with TCP/IP, Vol. III: Client-Server
`Programming and Applications, Linux/Posix Sockets Version, available at
`http://www.mypearsonstore.com/bookstore/internetworking-with-tcp-ip-vol.-iii-client-
`server-9780130320711.
`
`NPL48
`
`Declaration of Bridget A. Smith, filed in Commvault Systems, Inc. v. Realtime Data
`LLC, Case No. IPR2017-01710 (P.T.A.B.), filed June 30, 2017; 5 pages.
`
`NPL49
`
`NPL50
`
`Petition for Covered Business Method Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,717,204, filed in
`Commvault Systems, Inc. v. Realtime Data LLC, Case No. CBM2017-00061 (P.T.A.B.),
`filed June 30, 2017; 78 pages.
`
`Declaration of Professor James Storer, Ph.D., filed in Commvault Systems, Inc. v.
`Realtime Data LLC, Case No. CBM2017-00061 (P.T.A.B.), filed June 30, 2017; 36
`pages.
`
`Examiner
`Signature
`
`Date
`Considered
`
`*EXAMINER: Initial if reference considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609. Draw line through citation if not in conformance
`and not considered. Include copy of this form with next communication to applicant.
`I Applicant's unique citation designation number (optional). 2 Applicant is to place a check mark here if English language Translation is attached.
`
`Page 1271
`
`
`
`Substitute for form 1449/PTO
`TWELFTH SUPPLEMENTAL
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
`STATEMENT BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`of
`6
`6
`
`Sheet
`
`Equivalent of Form PTO/SB/08b (7-09
`Complete if Known
`I 14/876,276
`Application Number
`Filing Date
`October 6, 2015
`First Named Inventor
`James J. FALLON
`Art Unit
`2634
`Examiner Name
`BOCURE, Tesfaldet
`Attorney Docket Number 3421.005000C
`
`NON PATENT LITERATURE DOCUMENTS
`
`Examiner
`Initials*
`
`Cite
`No.1
`
`Include name of the author (in CAPITAL LETTERS), title of the article (when
`appropriate), title of the item (book, magazine, journal, serial, symposium, catalog,
`etc.), date, page(s), volume number, publisher, city and/or country where published
`
`T2
`
`NPL51
`
`Postal Addressing Standards - Contents, Publication 28, November 1997; 128 pages.
`
`NPL52
`
`Excerpts from The Progress of Invention in the Nineteenth Century, Edward W. Byrn,
`Munn & Co., Publishers 1900; pp. 15-31.
`
`NPL53
`
`Excerpts from Comprehensive Dictionary of Electrical Engineering, CRC Press LLC
`1999; pp. 249-250.
`
`NPL54
`
`Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No.
`7,777,651, issued July 8, 2016; 2 pages.
`
`NPL55
`
`Mayer, American Telegraphy and Encyclopedia of the Telegraph: Systems, Apparatus,
`Operation, Mayer Publishing Company, New York NY 1912; 101 pages.
`
`NPL56 Hacker, "MP3: The Definitive Guide," First Edition, O'Reilly March 2000; 8 pages.
`
`NPL57
`
`Schulzrinne et al., "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications," RFC 1889,
`Network Working Group January 1996 1996; 75 pages.
`
`5506113_1.docx
`
`Examiner
`Signature
`
`Date
`Considered
`
`*EXAMINER: Initial if reference considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609. Draw line through citation if not in conformance
`and not considered. Include copy of this form with next communication to applicant.
`Applicant's unique citation designation number (optional). Z Applicant is to place a check mark here if English language Translation is attached.
`
`Page 1272
`
`
`
`Doc Code: PET.AUTO
`Document Description: Petition automatically granted by EFS-Web
`
`PTO/SB/140
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`Department of Commerce
`
`Electronic Petition Request
`
`PETITION TO WITHDRAW AN APPLICATION FROM ISSUE AFTER PAYMENT OF
`THE ISSUE FEE UNDER 37 CFR 1.313(c)
`
`Application Number
`
`Filing Date
`
`14876276
`
`06-Oct-2015
`
`First Named Inventor
`
`James FALLON
`
`Art Unit
`
`2634
`
`Examiner Name
`
`TESFALDET BOCURE
`
`Attorney Docket Number
`
`3421.005000C
`
`Title
`
`VIDEO DATA COMPRESSION SYSTEMS
`
`An application may be withdrawn from issue for further action upon petition by the applicant. To request that the Office
`withdraw an application from issue, applicant must file a petition under this section including the fee set forth in § 1.17(h) and a
`showing of good and sufficient reasons why withdrawal of the application from issue is necessary.
`
`APPLICANT HEREBY PETITIONS TO WITHDRAW THIS APPLICATION FROM ISSUE UNDER 37 CFR 1313(c).
`
`A grantable petition requires the following items:
`(1) Petition fee; and
`(2) One of the following reasons:
`(a) Unpatentability of one or more claims, which must be accompanied by an unequivocal statement that one or more claims
`are unpatentable, an amendment to such claim or claims, and an explanation as to how the amendment causes such claim or
`claims to be patentable;
`(b) Consideration of a request for continued examination in compliance with § 1.114 (for a utility or plant application only); or
`(c) Express abandonment