`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NETFLIX, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________________
`
`Case IPR2018-01630
`Patent No. 9,769,477
`____________________
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01630
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s April 19, 2019,
`
`Scheduling Order (Paper 14), Patent Owner respectfully requests oral
`
`argument on the issues raised in the Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S.
`
`Patent 9,769,477, Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response, Patent Owner’s
`
`Response, Petitioner’s Reply to Patent Owner’s Response, and Patent
`
`Owner’s Sur-Reply to the Petition. Per the Board’s April 19, 2019 Order
`
`(Paper 14), oral argument is currently scheduled for October 14, 2019.
`
`The issues to be argued are:
`
`• Whether the claims of U.S. Patent 9,769,477 are unpatentable under
`
`any instituted ground of unpatentability;
`
`• Any issues identified in Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument;
`
`• Rebuttal to Petitioner’s presentation on all matters;
`
`• Any other issues raised in papers filed in this proceeding, including
`
`issues raised in papers yet to be filed, such as Motions to Exclude; and
`
`• Any other outstanding motions and pleadings, and other issues that
`
`the Board deems necessary for issuing a Final Written Decision.
`
`Additionally, Patent Owner requests the ability to use audio visual
`
`equipment to display possible demonstratives and exhibits, including the use
`
`of a computer, projector and screen.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01630
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/s/ Joel Stonedale
`
`
`
`Joel P.N. Stonedale, Reg. No. 76,924
`Noroozi PC
`111 Congress Ave. Suite 400
`Austin, TX 78701
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`Date: September 10, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01630
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing PATENT
`
`OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served
`
`electronically via e-mail on September 10, 2019 to the following counsel of
`
`record for Petitioner:
`
`Harper Batts (Lead Counsel)
`Chris Ponder (Back-up Counsel)
`Jeffrey Liang (Back-up Counsel)
`Service Email
`
`HBatts@sheppardmullin.com
`CPonder@sheppardmullin.com
`JLiang@sheppardmullin.com
`Legaltm-Netflix-Realtime-
`IPRs@sheppardmullin.com
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/s/ Joel Stonedale
`
`
`
`Joel P.N. Stonedale, Reg. No. 76,924
`Noroozi PC
`111 Congress Ave. Suite 400
`Austin, TX 78701
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`Date: September 10, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
