`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. 22
`Entered: February 21, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`REACTIVE SURFACES LTD., LLP,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00572
`Patent 8,252,571 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before CHRISTOPHER M. KAISER, JEFFREY W. ABRAHAM, and
`MICHELLE N. ANKENBRAND, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KAISER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`On February 14, 2017, counsel for Patent Owner contacted the Board
`
`to request authorization to file a motion to dismiss the Petition based on
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe
`Ex. 2014, p. 1
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00572
`Patent 8,252,571 B2
`
`
`sovereign immunity.1 The Board held a conference call on February 17,
`
`2017, between Judges Kaiser, Abraham, and Ankenbrand and counsel for
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner, to discuss Patent Owner’s request.
`
`Patent Owner argued that the Regents of the University of Minnesota
`
`are an arm of the government of the State of Minnesota and that they are an
`
`indispensable party to this proceeding, making proceeding against the other
`
`patent owners impossible. Accordingly, Patent Owner argued that, based on
`
`the panel’s decision in Covidien LP v. University of Florida Research
`
`Foundation Inc., Case No. IPR2016-01274 (PTAB Jan. 25, 2017) (Paper 21)
`
`(granting motion to dismiss), Patent Owner here is entitled to dismissal on
`
`the ground of sovereign immunity. Patent Owner also argued that its request
`
`for a motion to dismiss was timely, coming before the deadline for a
`
`decision on institution and less than three weeks after the Covidien decision.
`
`Patent Owner further requested that the Board extend the due date for Patent
`
`Owner to file its preliminary response.
`
`Petitioner argued that Covidien is not applicable because, although the
`
`Regents of the University of Minnesota may have a sovereign-immunity
`
`argument, the remaining patent owners do not, and the Board’s rules have no
`
`rule analogous to Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, defining
`
`what may and may not be done in the absence of indispensable parties.
`
`Petitioner also argued that the failure of the Regents of the University of
`
`
`
`1 Although the Petition names only Toyota Motor Corporation as a Patent
`Owner, the challenged patent is also assigned to, inter alia, the Regents of
`the University of Minnesota. Ex. 1001, at [73].
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe
`Ex. 2014, p. 2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00572
`Patent 8,252,571 B2
`
`
`Minnesota to file mandatory notices in this proceeding demonstrates that
`
`they are not an indispensable party.
`
`Given the unique facts presented by this proceeding, we determine
`
`that it is in the interests of justice to receive briefing on the sovereign-
`
`immunity question. Accordingly, we authorize Patent Owner to file a
`
`motion to dismiss. The motion, not to exceed 20 pages, shall be filed no
`
`later than March 3, 2017. Evidence relevant to the sovereign-immunity
`
`issue may be filed as exhibits accompanying the motion to dismiss. Should
`
`Patent Owner choose to file evidence in the form of declarations, and should
`
`Petitioner wish to cross-examine the declarants, the parties are instructed to
`
`agree on a time and location for the depositions, to take place early enough
`
`to permit Petitioner to file an opposition to the motion. If the parties cannot
`
`resolve any dispute about the depositions of Patent Owner’s declarants, they
`
`should contact the Board to schedule a conference call to resolve the dispute.
`
`Petitioner shall file any opposition to Patent Owner’s motion to
`
`dismiss no later than March 17, 2017. Petitioner’s opposition shall not
`
`exceed 20 pages.
`
`If Petitioner files an opposition, and if that opposition includes
`
`arguments regarding waiver of sovereign immunity, Patent Owner is
`
`authorized to file a reply addressing only the waiver issue no later than
`
`March 24, 2017. The reply shall not exceed 5 pages.
`
`In order to permit the parties time to brief this issue and the Board
`
`time to resolve it, Patent Owner’s request to extend the due date for its
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe
`Ex. 2014, p. 3
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00572
`Patent 8,252,571 B2
`
`
`preliminary response is granted, and the due date is extended until May 17,
`
`2017.
`
`
`
`
`
`It is, therefore,
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner is authorized to file, no later than
`
`March 3, 2017, a motion to dismiss based on sovereign immunity, limited to
`
`20 pages;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that, if Patent Owner files a motion to dismiss
`
`based on sovereign immunity, Petitioner is authorized to file, no later than
`
`March 17, 2017, an opposition to Patent Owner’s motion to dismiss, limited
`
`to 20 pages;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that, if Petitioner files an opposition to Patent
`
`Owner’s motion to dismiss, and if Petitioner’s opposition addresses waiver
`
`of sovereign immunity by the Regents of the University of Minnesota,
`
`Patent Owner is authorized to file, no later than March 24, 2017, a reply
`
`addressing only the waiver issue, limited to 5 pages;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for Patent Owner to file its
`
`preliminary response is extended to May 17, 2017; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that no other filings are authorized at this
`
`time.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`Patent Owner Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe
`Ex. 2014, p. 4
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00572
`Patent 8,252,571 B2
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`David O. Simmons
`IVC PATENT AGENCY
`dsimmons@ivcpatentagency.com
`
`
`Jonathan D. Hurt
`MCDANIEL & ASSOCIATES, PC
`jhurt@technologylitigators.com
`
`
`Mark A.J. Fassold
`Jorge Mares
`Watts Guerra LLP
`mfassold@wattsguerra.comjmares@wattsguerra.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Joshua A. Lorentz
`Richard Schabowsky
`John D. Luken
`Oleg Khariton
`DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP
`joshua.lorentz@dinsmore.comrichard.schabowsky@dinsmore.com
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe
`Ex. 2014, p. 5
`
`