`______________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`______________________
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`SAINT REGIS MOHAWK TRIBE,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`_______________________
`
`IPR2018-01605
`
`Patent No. 7,620,800
`
`__________________________
`
`
`AMENDED DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER L. EVANS IN SUPPORT
`OF PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`CHRISTOPHER L. EVANS UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`I, Christopher L. Evans, declare as follows:
`
`1. I am more than twenty-one years of age, competent to present this affidavit, and
`
`have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein.
`
`2. This affidavit is given in support of Patent Owner’s Amended Motion for Pro
`
`Hac Vice Admission of Christopher L. Evans.
`
`3. I am a partner at the law firm Shore Chan DePumpo LLP.
`
`4. I have been practicing law since 2009 and have extensive experience litigating
`
`patent infringement cases in many different courts across the United States.
`
`5. I have been litigating patent cases for over nine years and I am co-lead counsel
`
`in the concurrently pending district court proceeding: SRC Labs, LLC and Saint
`
`Regis Mohawk Tribe v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 2:18-cv-00321-JLR (W.D.
`
`Wash.). In that case, Plaintiffs have accused Microsoft of infringing U.S Patent Nos.
`
`6,076,152, 6,247,110, 6,434,687, 7,225,324, and 7,762,800. Because of my work on
`
`that case I have acquired unique and specialized knowledge concerning U.S Patent
`
`Nos. 6,076,152, 6,247,110, 6,434,687, 7,225,324, and 7,762,800, the field of
`
`reconfigurable computing, and the prior art that Microsoft has asserted in each of the
`
`ten IPRs filed against these five patents because the same prior art has been asserted
`
`in the district court case.
`
`2
`
`
`
`6. My experience in patent litigation matters includes being co-lead counsel in
`
`trial, arguing multiple Markman hearings, and many other patent-related hearings
`
`concerning various issues, such as validity and infringement.
`
`7. I am a member in good standing of the Bar of Texas (admitted 2009), as well as
`
`the following Federal Courts: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas,
`
`U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, U.S. District Court for the
`
`Southern District of Texas, U.S District Court for New Mexico, and the United States
`
`Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
`
`8. I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`9. No court or administrative body has ever denied my application for admission
`
`to practice before it.
`
`10. No court or administrative body has imposed sanctions or contempt citations
`
`on me.
`
`11. I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and
`
`the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in in 37 C.F.R. § 42.
`
`12. I understand that I will be subject to the USPTO Code of Professional
`
`Responsibility set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction
`
`under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`3
`
`
`
`13. I have applied to appear pro hac vice in one other consolidated proceeding
`
`before the Office in the last three years, which was Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al.
`
`v. Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe and Allergan, Inc. IPR2016-01127, -01128, -01129, -
`
`01130, -01131, -01132.
`
`14. I currently represent Patent Owner, Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, in other patent
`
`matters and as a result have specialized knowledge of tribal sovereign immunity,
`
`which is a subject matter at issue in this proceeding.
`
`15. I have also represented other sovereigns, such as the University of Florida
`
`Research Foundation, Inc., which gives me unique and specialized knowledge
`
`concerning the application of tribal sovereign immunity in inter partes review.
`
`16. I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are true
`
`and further that all statements herein are made with knowledge that willful false
`
`statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under
`
`Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: February 25, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`Christopher L. Evans
`Shore Chan DePumpo LLP
`901 Main Street, Suite 3300
`Dallas, TX 75201
`214-593-9118
`cevans@shorechan.com
`
`4
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`This is to certify that I caused to be served true and correct copies of the
`
`Amended Declaration of Christopher L. Evans in Support of Patent Owner’s
`
`Motion For Pro Hac Vice Admission of Christopher L. Evans Under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.10(c) on February 25, 2019 to the Petitioner at the correspondence address of
`
`the Petitioners as follows:
`
`Joseph A. Micallef
`jmicallef@sidley.com
`Scott M. Border
`sborder@sidley.com
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`1501 K Street N.W.
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Jason P. Greenhut
`jgreenhut@sidley.com
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`1 South Dearborn
`Chicago, IL 60603
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /Alfonso Chan/
`Alfonso Chan
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`