throbber
Paper No. 21
`December 10, 2019
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC., and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`UNILOC 2017 LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2018-015891
`Patent 7,653,508 B1
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL
`
`1 Samsung Electronics America, Inc., which filed a petition in IPR2019-00889, has
`been joined as a petitioner in this proceeding.
`
`

`

`I.
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10 – STATEMENT OF RELIEF REQUESTED
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board
`
`authorize the withdrawal of Mario A. Apreotesi as backup counsel in this matter.
`
`II.
`
`STATEMENT SHOWING GOOD CAUSE FOR THE BOARD TO
`AUTHORIZE WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL
`On August 23, 2018, Petitioner submitted its Power of Attorney for Petition
`
`for Inter Partes Review, appointing Mario A. Apreotesi as one of its backup counsel
`
`in the above-captioned inter partes review. Paper 2. For good cause, Petitioner
`
`requests that Mario A. Apreotesi be deemed withdrawn from the present proceeding.
`
`Mr. Apreotesi is leaving the firm of Vinson & Elkins LLP and will have no
`
`continuing involvement in this matter. Todd E. Landis and Jeffrey R. Swigart, Lead
`
`Counsel and Back-up Counsel, respectively, will remain as counsel for Petitioner.
`
`Further, Petitioner believes that granting this motion will not hinder the economy,
`
`the integrity of the patent system, the efficient administration of the Office, or the
`
`ability of the Office to timely complete this proceeding. See 35 U.S.C. § 316(b).
`
`Patent Owner has indicated it does not oppose the requested withdrawal.
`
`III. CONCLUSION
`Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board grant its motion for withdrawal
`
`of Mario A. Apreotesi as backup counsel for Petitioner. Upon grant of this motion,
`
`Petitioner will promptly file an updated Power of Attorney and Mandatory Notices
`
`removing Mr. Apreotesi from his previous role as backup counsel for Petitioner.
`
`1
`
`

`

`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Todd E. Landis/
`Todd E. Landis
`USPTO Reg. No. 44,200
`
`Dated: December 10, 2019
`Vinson & Elkins LLP
`2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 3900
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Customer No. 22892
`Phone: (214) 220-7700
`Fax: (214) 220-7716
`
`2
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned certifies that, in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the
`
`foregoing document is being served electronically on the 10th day of December,
`
`2019, upon the Patent Owner as follows:
`
`Brian Koide
`brian@etheridgelaw.com
`
`Ryan Loveless
`ryan@etheridgelaw.com
`
`Brett Mangrum
`brett@etheridgelaw.com
`
`James Etheridge
`jim@etheridgelaw.com
`
`Jeffrey Huang
`jeff@etheridgelaw.com
`
`ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP
`2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Ste. 120-324
`Southlake, TX 76092
`
`Dated: December 10, 2019
`
`/Todd E. Landis/
`Todd E. Landis
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`USPTO Reg. No. 44,200
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket