UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`Washington, D.C.
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN LTE- AND 3G-COMPLIANT
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`DEVICES
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1138
`
`ORDER NO. 7:
`
`SETTING THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE
`
`(November 6, 2018)
`
`On October 31, 2018, Complainant INVT SPE LLC ("INVT" or "Complainant"),
`
`Respondents Apple Inc. ("Apple"), HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc. (collectively,
`
`"HTC"), ZTE Corporation, and ZTE (USA), Inc. (collectively, "ZTE") (collectively
`
`"Respondents," and with INVT, "the Private Parties"), and the Office of Unfair Import
`
`Investigations ("Staff, and with INVT and Respondents, "the Parties"), filed a Joint
`
`Proposed Procedural Schedule ("Proposed Schedule"). (Doc. ID No. 660499; Proposed
`
`Schedule at 1.). Having considered the Parties' Proposed Schedule, the Procedural
`
`Schedule attached hereto as Appendix A is adopted.
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`Joan McNamara
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`Page 1 of!
`
`IPR2018-01556
`HTC v. INVT
`INVT Exhibit 2003 - Page 1
`
`
`
`Washington, D.C.
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN LTE- AND 3G-COMPLIANT
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`DEVICES
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1138
`
`ORDER NO. 7:
`
`SETTING THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE
`
`(November 6, 2018)
`
`On October 31, 2018, Complainant INVT SPE LLC ("INVT" or "Complainant"),
`
`Respondents Apple Inc. ("Apple"), HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc. (collectively,
`
`"HTC"), ZTE Corporation, and ZTE (USA), Inc. (collectively, "ZTE") (collectively
`
`"Respondents," and with INVT, "the Private Parties"), and the Office of Unfair Import
`
`Investigations ("Staff, and with INVT and Respondents, "the Parties"), filed a Joint
`
`Proposed Procedural Schedule ("Proposed Schedule"). (Doc. ID No. 660499; Proposed
`
`Schedule at 1.). Having considered the Parties' Proposed Schedule, the Procedural
`
`Schedule attached hereto as Appendix A is adopted.
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`Joan McNamara
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`Page 1 of!
`
`IPR2018-01556
`HTC v. INVT
`INVT Exhibit 2003 - Page 1
`
`
`
`APPENDIX A
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1138
`
`PROCEDURALSCHEDULE
`
`Parties file a joint proposed procedural schedule and
`identify USPTO/PTO proceedings as well as state and
`federallitigation that is relevant to this Investigation
`
`Deadline for Complainant’s objections and responsesto
`Respondents’first set of interrogatories and request for
`production
`
`Deadline for Respondents’ objections and responsesto
`Complainant’s first set of interrogatories and requests for
`production
`
`Deadline for propoundingfirst set of interrogatories
`
`Deadline for propounding first request for production of
`documents
`
`Deadline for propoundinginitial contention interrogatories
`
`
`
`October 31, 2018
`
`November5, 2018
`
`November 5, 2018
`
`November30, 2018
`(already completed by
`private parties)
`
`November30, 2018
`(already completed by
`private parties)
`
`November 30, 2018
`(already completed by
`Pp
`private parties)
`
`Identification of expert witnesses, including their expertise
`and curriculum vitae
`
`November27, 2018
`
`:
`
`Complainantfiles notice of patent priority dates/dates of
`. conception
`
`||
`
`November 20, 2018 |
`
`Parties exchangelist of patent claim terms for construction
`
`November 28, 2018
`
`Deadline for disclosure of Domestic Industry Products (see
`G.R. 1.13)
`
`November30, 2018
`
`Deadline forinitial contention interrogatory responses on
`whicha party has the burden of proof (except for
`
`December 19, 2018
`
`Page 1 of 5
`
`IPR2018-01556
`HTC v. INVT
`INVT Exhibit 2003 - Page 2
`
`IPR2018-01556
`HTC v. INVT
`INVT Exhibit 2003 - Page 2
`
`
`
`
`
`infringement and invalidity)
`
`December7, 2018
`Respondentsfile notice ofpriorart
`
`January 4, 2019
`Deadline for disclosure of invalidity contentions
`
`January 4, 2019
`Deadline for disclosure of infringement contentions
`
`January 4, 2019
`Deadline for disclosure of domestic industry contentions
`
`Complainant and Respondents provide each other and Staff
`with their proposed construction of disputed claim terms
`
`
`December12, 2018
`
`Staff provides private parties with its proposed construction
`of disputed claim terms
`
`
`December 17, 2018
`
`
`
`Deadlineforfirst settlement conference
`
`On or before November
`30, 2018
`
`[
`File tentative list of witnesses a party will call to testify at
`the evidentiary hearing, with an identification of each
`witness’s relationship to the party
`
`
`January 16, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`Parties meet and confer to attempt to limit terms and claim
`term disputes
`
`
`December 19, 2018
`
`Deadline for substantial completion of document (paper
`and electronic) discovery by Complainant and Respondents
`
`{
`December6, 2018
`Submit first settlement conference joint report
`
`December20, 2018
`
`
`
`Parties to exchange proposed Markmanexhibitlists and .
`exhibits (except for expert declarations and demonstratives)
`(per G.R. 1.14.3.1)
`
`
`December 17, 2018
`
`December 21, 2018
`File joint claim construction chart
`
`Deadline for responsesto all contention interrogatories on
`which a party does not bear the burden of proof, except for
`those related to infringement, invalidity, and domestic
`industry
`
`
`December 28, 2018
`
`Deadline for responsesto infringement, invalidity, and
`domestic industry contention interrogatories on which a
`party does not bear the burden of proof
`
`
`
`January 15, 2019
`
`
`
`Private parties file a joint list showing each party’s
`proposed construction of disputed claim terms, with initial
`
`January 11, 2019
`
`Page 2 of 5
`
`IPR2018-01556
`HTC v. INVT
`INVT Exhibit 2003 - Page 3
`
`IPR2018-01556
`HTC v. INVT
`INVT Exhibit 2003 - Page 3
`
`
`
`
`
`claim construction. briefs by private parties explaining their
`initial claim constructions and expert declarations (if
`applicable)
`
`
`|Staftfiles initial claim constructionbrief
`
`
`
`January 16, 2019
`
`|
`
`Deadline to file Markmanhearing proposals (including
`January 11, 2019
`final proposed Markman exhibitlists)
`
`
`|Parties file reply claim construction briefs January 18, 2019
`Lastdayto filemotionsto compel discovery
`L
`January22, 2019
`|
`
`
`
`Fact discovery cutoff and completion
`
`January 22, 2019
`
`
`
`data)
`
`
`
`Technologystipulation deadline January 22, 2019
`
`
`
`Exchangeofinitialexpertreports(identifytests/surveys/
`January25,2019:
`statements if appropriate), with physical and demonstrative i
`
`
`Submission of statements regarding the use of witness
`statements in lieu of live direct testimony, and statements
`regarding whether any party intends to offer expert reports
`into evidence
`
`February 18, 2019
`
`
`
`Markmanhearing (if ordered) (parties should provide
`thumb drive oftutorials if included in Markman hearing)
`
`
`February 25, 2019
`
`File joint chart setting forth parties’ post-hearing claim
`constructions (per G.R. 1.14)
`
`K
`Exchangeof rebuttal expert reports
`February 20, 2019
`
`
`March 5, 2019
`
`March 1, 2019
`Last day to file summary determination motions!
`
`L
`
`Parties exchange hearing exhibit lists
`March8, 2019
`
`Expert discovery cutoff and completion
`|
`March7, 2019
`
`Second settlement conference
`Onor before
`|
`February 27, 2019
`
`Submit and serve direct exhibits (including witness
`
`March 13, 2019
`
`' Commission Rule 210.18 requires at least 60 days between summary determination motions and the
`evidentiary hearing.
`
`Page 3 of
`
`IPR2018-01556
`HTC v. INVT
`INVT Exhibit 2003 - Page 4
`
`IPR2018-01556
`HTC v. INVT
`INVT Exhibit 2003 - Page 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`exhibits available - Complainant and Respondents
`
`
`
`File requests for receipt of evidence without a witness . March 15, 2019.
`
`Submit and serve directexhibits (including witness
`statements if appropriate), with physical and demonstrative
`exhibits available — Staff
`
`March 15, 2019
`
`
`
`Submit and service rebuttal exhibits (including witness
`statements), with rebuttal physical and demonstrative
`exhibits
`
`March 22, 2019
`
`Complainant and Respondents file pre-hearing statements
`and briefs (briefs should contain no more than 100 pages of
`text, each side, unless there is no identify of interests, or
`
`_ April 8, 2019
`
`April 15, 2019
`than 100 pagesoftext)
`
`April 17, 2019
`Parties file joint outline of issues/contentions from pre-
`hearing briefing (per G.R. 7.3)
`
`Submissions of declarations justifying confidentiality of
`exhibits
`
`
`April 17, 2019
`
`Attendance at one-day mediation session”
`
`On or before
`April 17, 2019
`
`Submission of Mediation Report
`
`.
`
`|
`
`different interests) Staff files pre-hearing statement and brief (brief no more
`
`
`
`fe
`
`(Within 7 days of
`mediation)
`April 19, 2019
`
`Last day to file motions in limine
`April 15, 2019
`Last day to file high priority objections
`April 15, 2019
`File responses to motionsin limine
`7 April 22, 2019
`
`File responses to high priority objections
`:
`|
`April 22, 2019
`
`
`
`Prehearing conference (location TBA)
`May 15, 2019
`
`Evidentiary hearing (starting with tutorials, as parties
`9:30 a.m., May 15-17,
`
`propose) (location TBA) 20-21, 2019
`
`* For any questions regarding the mediation program, the Parties should refer to the Revised Users’
`Manual for Commission Mediation Program,available at http://www.usitc.gov.
`
`Page 4 of 5
`
`IPR2018-01556
`HTC v. INVT
`INVT Exhibit 2003 - Page 5
`
`IPR2018-01556
`HTC v. INVT
`INVT Exhibit 2003 - Page 5
`
`
`
`
`
`Last day to submit final exhibits, by appointment. All
`exhibits should be properly labeled (follow G.Rs.)
`
`No more than four (4)
`business daysafter
`hearing
`May 28, 2019
`
`Complainants and Respondentsfile initial post-hearing
`briefs (only on issues for which the party bears the burden
`-of proof, per Order No. 2 at 4) and final exhibit lists (briefs
`no more than 75 pagesoftext)
`
`
`June 7, 2019
`
`Staff files initial post-hearing brief and final exhibitlist
`(brief no more than 75 pagesof text)
`
`
`June 14, 2019
`
`Submit final JOINT direct and rebuttal exhibits (via flash
`drive)
`
`
`June 7, 2019
`
`Complainants and Respondents file reply post-hearing
`briefs (only on issues discussedin theinitial post-hearing
`brief of an opposing party, per Order No. 2 at 4) (briefs no
`more than 50 pagesoftext)
`June 26, 2019
`Staff files reply post-hearing brief (brief no more than 50
`pages of text)
`
`
`June 21, 2019
`
`Parties file outline of issues, tracing arguments/contentions
`from pre-hearing through post-hearing reply briefs (include
`contentions/arguments that have been dropped, per G.R.
`7.3)
`
`June 28, 2019
`
`Final ID due
`
`_—}—_—
`November19, 2019 Target date
`
`March 19, 2020
`
`|
`
`Page 5 of 5
`
`IPR2018-01556
`_ HTC v. INVT
`INVT Exhibit 2003 - Page 6
`
`IPR2018-01556
`HTC v. INVT
`INVT Exhibit 2003 - Page 6
`
`
`
`CERTAIN LTE- AND 3G-COMPLIANT CELLULAR
`COMMUNICATIONSDEVICES
`.
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1138
`
`PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Lisa R. Barton, hereby certify that the attached ORDERhasbeenserved by hand upon the
`Commission Investigative Attorney, Reginald Lucas, Esq., and to the followingparties as
`indicated, on November6, 2018.
`
`
`
`Lisa R. Barton, Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW, Room 112
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`On Behalf of Complainant INVT SPE LLC:
`
`Bryan J. Vogel, Esq.
`509PakAanie3600
`ark
`Avenue,Suite
`New York, NY 10022
`
`On Behalf of Respondent Apple Inc.:
`Robert A. Appleby, P.C.
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`601 Lexington Avenue
`New York, NY 10022
`
`,
`
`.
`
`.
`
`] Via Hand Delivery
`CL] Via Express Delivery
`(Via First C
`.
`Othe.
`lass Mail
`
`[Via Hand Delivery
`C] Via Express Delivery
`DfVia First Class Mail
`Cl Other:
`
`On Behalf of Respondents HTC Corporation and HTC
`America, Inc.:
`.
`
`.
`Stephen S. Korniczky, Esq.
`SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
`12275 El Camino Real, Suite 200
`San Diego, CA 92130
`
`CJ Via Hand Delivery
`1 Via Express Delivery
`WVia First Class Mail
`C) Other:
`
`On Behalf of Respondents ZTE Corporation and ZTE (USA)
`Inc.:
`
`Jay H. Reiziss, Esq.
`McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
`500 North Capitol Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`
`L] Via Hand Delivery
`CJ Via Express Delivery
`SMvia First Class Mail
`Cl] Other:
`
`IPR2018-01556
`HTC v. INVT
`INVT Exhibit2003 - Page 7
`
`IPR2018-01556
`HTC v. INVT
`INVT Exhibit 2003 - Page 7
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
