`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 12
`Entered: April 11, 2019
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`HTC CORPORATION and HTC AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`INVT SPE LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-01555
`Patent 7,848,439 B2
`____________
`
`Before THU A. DANG, KEVIN F. TURNER, and BARBARA A. BENOIT,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BENOIT, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01555
`Patent 7,848,439 B2
`
`A conference call took place on April 10, 2019 between Judges Dang, Turner,
`and Benoit and respective counsel for Patent Owner and Petitioner. The purpose of
`the call was to discuss ways in which IPR2018-01555 and IPR2018-01581 could be
`consolidated or otherwise conducted in light of the significant overlap of the
`proceedings. See Paper 11, 3–5 (describing substantial similarities between the
`challenges in IPR2018-01555 and IPR2018-01581).
`Among the suggestions, both parties agreed that this proceeding should
`proceed according to due dates in the IPR2018-01581 scheduling order (IPR2018-
`01581, Paper 10) and that a consolidated oral argument (if requested) should be held
`to address issues in IPR2018-01555 and IPR2018-01581.
`We concur with the parties and set forth the revised due dates for IPR2018-
`01555 in the Revised Due Date Appendix.
`It is so ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01555
`Patent 7,848,439 B2
`
`
`REVISED DUE DATE APPENDIX
`
`DUE DATE 1 ............................................................................. June 26, 2019
`Patent Owner’s response to the petition
`Patent Owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`DUE DATE 2 ................................................................... September 18, 2019
`Petitioner’s reply to Patent Owner’s response to petition
`Petitioner’s opposition to Patent Owner’s motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 3 ....................................................................... October 30, 2019
`Patent Owner’s sur-reply to Petitioner’s reply to response to petition
`Patent Owner’s reply to Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DATE TO REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT .................. November 20, 2019
`A request for oral argument (may not be extended by stipulation)
`
`DUE DATE 4 .................................................................... December 11, 2019
`Petitioner’s sur-reply to reply to opposition to motion to amend
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`DUE DATE 5 .................................................................... December 18, 2019
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`Request for pre-hearing conference
`
`DUE DATE 6 .................................................................... December 26, 2019
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 7 .......................................................................... January 8, 2020
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01555
`Patent 7,848,439 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Stephen S. Korniczky
`Martin R. Bader
`Nam H. Kim
`Darren M. Franklin
`Ericka Jacobs Schulz
`SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
`skomiczky@sheppardmullin.com
`mbader@sheppardmullin.com
`nkim@sheppardmullin.com
`dfranklin@sheppardmullin.com
`eschulz@sheppardmullin.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Cyrus A. Morton
`Bryan J. Vogel
`Derrick J. Carman
`Stephanie A. Diehl
`Shui Li
`Li Zhu
`ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
`cmorton@robinskaplan.com
`bvogel@robinskaplan.com
`dcarman@robinskaplan.com
`sdiehl@robinskaplan.com
`sli@robinskaplan.com
`lzhu@robinskaplan.com
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
