throbber
(12) United States Patent
`Hashem et al.
`
`I IIIII IIIIIIII Ill lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll 111111111111111111
`US006721569Bl
`
`(10) Patent No.:
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US 6,721,569 Bl
`Apr. 13, 2004
`
`(54) DYNAMIC SUB-CARRIER ASSIGNMENT IN
`OFDM SYSTEMS
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: Bassam M. Hashem, Nepean (CA);
`David G. Steer, Nepean (CA); Shalini
`S. Periyalwar, Ottawa (CA)
`
`EP
`
`(73) Assignee: Nortel Networks Limited, St. Laurent
`(CA)
`
`( *) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 419 days.
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 09/672,704
`
`(22) Filed:
`
`Sep. 29, 2000
`
`Int. Cl.7 .................................................. H04Q 7/20
`(51)
`(52) U.S. Cl. .................... 455/450; 455/509; 455/414.1;
`455/464; 370/203; 370/208
`(58) Field of Search ................................. 455/450, 455,
`455/464, 509, 511, 515, 154.1, 166.2, 185.1,
`130, 135, 277.2, 403, 408, 407, 414.1;
`370/343, 344, 330, 341, 342, 208, 203,
`480; 375/260, 349
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`5,726,978 A * 3/1998 Frodigh et al.
`............. 370/252
`5,748,677 A * 5/1998 Kumar ....................... 375/285
`5,867,478 A * 2/1999 Baum et al. ................ 370/203
`5,889,759 A * 3/1999 McGibney .................. 370/207
`6,243,424 Bl * 6/2001 Kroeger et al. ............. 375/265
`6,298,035 Bl * 10/2001 Heiskala ..................... 370/206
`
`6,347,071 Bl * 2/2002 Cupo et al. ................. 370/203
`6,545,997 Bl * 4/2003 Bohnke et al.
`............. 370/347
`6,584,092 Bl * 6/2003 Sudo .......................... 370/344
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`1033853 A2 * 9/2000
`
`........... H04L/27/26
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Jack H. Winters, "Smart Antennas for Wireless Systems",
`IEEE Personal Communications, pp. 23-27, Feb. 1998.
`Agrogyaswami J. Paulraj, et al. "Space-Time Modems for
`Wireless Personal Communication", IEEE Personal Com(cid:173)
`munications, pp. 36-47, Feb. 1998.
`* cited by examiner
`
`Primary Examiner-Cong Van Tran
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A method and apparatus are provided for selecting and
`signaling the identity of sub-carriers to be used for trans(cid:173)
`mission of data in a radio communication system, and for
`using other sub-carriers. A remote unit determines which
`sub-carriers are acceptable for use in data transmission by
`comparing the signal to interference ratio of each sub-carrier
`with a threshold. A base station transmits data over the
`acceptable sub-carriers at the optimum Link Mode or Link
`Modes. The base station may use some of the unacceptable
`sub-carriers for transmission of low sensitivity data at the
`optimum Link Mode, and may use some of the unacceptable
`sub-carriers for transmission of data at a lower Link Mode.
`The transmission power any unused unacceptable sub(cid:173)
`carriers can be diverted to other sub-carriers.
`
`23 Claims, 6 Drawing Sheets
`
`USER
`~
`
`DECODER
`ll
`
`REMOTE UNIT 1§
`
`FFT
`PROCESSOR
`fl!
`
`SUB·CARRIER
`ANALYSIS
`PROCESSOR
`~
`
`BASE STATION .!!l_
`
`14
`
`SIGNAL
`GENERATOR
`I§.
`
`LINK MODE
`EVALUATOR
`M
`
`EXTRACTOR
`TI.
`
`DATA
`
`38
`
`IPR2018-1555
`HTC EX1005, Page 1
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 13, 2004
`
`Sheet 1 of 6
`
`US 6,721,569 Bl
`
`USER
`24
`
`REMOTE UNIT 1.§.·
`
`FFT
`PROCESSOR
`20
`
`1 - - - DECODER .____ SUB-CARRIER
`22
`ANALYSIS
`PROCESSOR
`26
`
`28
`
`BASE STATION !Q
`
`\V
`
`tv14
`--
`
`SIGNAL
`GENERATOR
`36
`
`I-+--
`
`-
`
`-:: -
`
`LINK MODE
`EVALUATOR
`34
`
`I+-
`
`EXTRACTOR
`33
`
`l
`
`\V
`
`32v-
`
`-
`
`DATA
`_)
`38
`
`FIG. 1
`
`IPR2018-1555
`HTC EX1005, Page 2
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 13, 2004
`
`Sheet 2 of 6
`
`US 6,721,569 Bl
`
`dB
`....
`14dB -
`
`r,...-42
`
`12dB -
`
`lOdB .- -
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`BdB -
`
`6dB -
`
`4dB
`
`2dB -
`
`OdB
`
`-
`
`-
`
`,-..
`
`-
`
`(
`44
`
`n
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10 1 1 12 r
`
`40
`
`SUB-BAND
`
`FIG. 2
`
`-
`
`-
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`IPR2018-1555
`HTC EX1005, Page 3
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 13, 2004
`
`Sheet 3 of 6
`
`US 6,721,569 Bl
`
`RECEIVE
`SIGNAL
`80
`
`SEPARATE SIGNAL
`INTO COMPONENTS
`82
`
`SELECT FIRST
`SUB-CARRIER
`84
`
`MEASURE S/1
`86
`
`SELECT NEXT SUB(cid:173)
`CARRIER
`94
`
`TOTAL- TOTAL+ S/1;
`y
`COUNT =COUNT+ 1;
`>----- ADJUST BITMASK
`90
`
`AVERAGE S/1= TOTAL
`96 COUNT
`
`TRANSMIT AVERAGE
`SIi AND BITMASK
`98
`
`FIG. 3
`
`IPR2018-1555
`HTC EX1005, Page 4
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 13, 2004
`
`Sheet 4 of 6
`
`US 6,721,569 Bl
`
`RECEIVE RETURN
`SIGNAL
`120
`
`EXTRACT BITMASK,
`AVERAGE S/1
`122
`
`SELECT LINK MODE
`124
`
`SELECT FIRST
`SUB-CARRIER
`128
`
`y
`
`ENCODE DATA USING
`LINK MOOE
`132
`
`ENCODE LOW SENSITIVITY
`DATA USING LINK MOOE
`134
`
`SELECT NEXT SUB·
`CARRIER
`138
`
`FIG. 4
`
`TRANSMIT SIGNAL
`140
`
`IPR2018-1555
`HTC EX1005, Page 5
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 13, 2004
`
`Sheet 5 of 6
`
`US 6,721,569 Bl
`
`RECEIVE
`SIGNAL
`80
`
`SEPARATE SIGNAL
`INTO COMPONENTS
`82
`
`SELECT FIRST
`SUB-CARRIER
`84
`
`MEASURE SIi
`86
`
`SELECT NEXT SUB(cid:173)
`CARRIER .
`94
`
`TRANSMIT
`SEQUENCE OF SUB(cid:173)
`CARRIER LINK MODES
`99
`
`DETERMINE LINK
`MODE
`89
`
`ADJUST SEQUENCE
`OF SUB-CARRIER
`LINK MODES
`91
`
`FIG. 5
`
`IPR2018-1555
`HTC EX1005, Page 6
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 13, 2004
`
`Sheet 6 of 6
`
`US 6,721,569 Bl
`
`SIGNAL
`120
`
`EXTRACT SEOUENCE
`OF LINK MODES
`123
`
`SELECT FIRST
`SUB-CARRIER
`128
`
`y
`
`DETERMINE LINK
`MODE
`131
`
`ENCODE LOW SENSITIVITY
`DATA USING LOW LINK MODE
`134
`
`SELECT NEXT SUB(cid:173)
`CARRIER
`138
`
`y
`
`ENCODE DATA USING
`LINK MODE
`132 .
`
`TRANSMIT SIGNAL
`140
`
`FIG. 6
`
`IPR2018-1555
`HTC EX1005, Page 7
`
`

`

`US 6,721,569 Bl
`
`1
`DYNAMIC SUB-CARRIER ASSIGNMENT IN
`OFDM SYSTEMS
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`This invention relates to digital radio communication
`systems employing multiple sub-carriers, and more particu(cid:173)
`larly to dynamic use of sub-carriers within such systems.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`5
`
`2
`the paper by A J. Paulraj and B. C. Ng, "Space-time
`Modems for Wireless Personal Communications", IEEE
`Pers. Commun., vol. 5, no. 1, February 1998, pp. 36-48,
`which is incorporated by reference herein.
`In communication systems employing many sub-carriers,
`such as those that employ Orthogonal Frequency Division
`Multiplexing (OFDM systems), the channel quality may
`vary with the frequency of each sub-carrier. OFDM systems
`can use 1000 sub-carriers, and transmission of information
`10 describing the channel quality and a set of optimum trans(cid:173)
`mission parameters for each sub-carrier would require sig(cid:173)
`nificant overhead, reducing the efficiency of the communi(cid:173)
`cation system. In current methods, the signal to interference
`ratio is averaged over all sub-carriers so that only one signal
`15 to interference ratio is reported to the base station and only
`one set of new optimum transmission parameters is trans(cid:173)
`mitted to the remote unit. In this method, the single set of
`new optimum transmission parameters results in an unnec(cid:173)
`essarily low transmission rate for individual sub-carriers
`20 whose signal to interference ratio is higher than the average
`signal to interference ratio reported by the receiver.
`
`In a digital radio communication system a base station
`transmits a signal at a transmission rate to a remote unit
`through a radio channel having channel characteristics, such
`as an attenuation. The signal is transmitted using transmis(cid:173)
`sion parameters, such as a modulation level and a coding
`rate. The transmission rate depends on the transmission
`parameters. The transmission parameters are constrained by
`an acceptable bit error rate and by a signal to interference
`ratio of the signal, the latter varying in time with the channel
`characteristics. The communication system can use adaptive
`modulation to adjust the transmission parameters to accom(cid:173)
`modate changes in channel characteristics over time. If a
`change in channel characteristics results in a lower signal to
`interference ratio, the modulation level must be reduced (for 25
`example, from 16-QAM to QPSK) or the coding rate must
`be improved (for example, from% to 2/3) in order to maintain
`the acceptable bit error rate, albeit at a lower transmission
`rate. If a change in channel characteristics results in a higher
`signal to interference ratio, the base station can increase the 30
`modulation level or decrease the coding rate in order to
`obtain a higher transmission rate.
`In a communication system that implements adaptive
`modulation, the base station and the remote unit must be
`synchronized with respect to the transmission parameters. In
`current communication systems the remote unit determines
`a channel quality when the remote unit receives a frame of
`data. The remote unit may estimate, for example, the signal
`to interference ratio of the channel. The remote unit sends a
`signal back to the base station reporting the channel quality.
`Using the channel quality report received from the remote
`unit, the base station calculates a set of optimum transmis(cid:173)
`sion parameters which the base station will use in its next
`transmission of data. However, the base station must first
`send the set of new optimum transmission parameters to the
`remote unit using the previous transmission parameters. The
`remote unit receives the set of new optimum transmission
`parameters, interpreting the signal using the previous trans(cid:173)
`mission parameters. The remote unit then decodes subse(cid:173)
`quent frames of data using the new optimum transmission 50
`parameters.
`In communication systems that make use of multiple
`antennae for transmission and reception, the transmission
`parameters may include adaptive antenna and coding param(cid:173)
`eters. For example, some "smart antenna" systems may 55
`adaptively adjust their directional patterns towards the
`remote units. An outline of such systems may be found in the
`paper by J. H. Winters, "Smart Antennas for Wireless
`Systems", IEEE Pers. Commun., vol. 5, no. 1, February
`1998, pp. 23-27, which is incorporated by reference herein. 60
`Similarly, the radio system may make use of the multiple
`communication channels that exist between transmitters and
`receivers with multiple antennae. In this case, the transmis(cid:173)
`sion parameters include both space ( across multiple
`antennae) and time (different time of transmission) aspects 65
`that adapt the transmissions to the multiple propagation
`environment. An outline of such systems may be found in
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention provides a method of selecting and
`signalling the identity of acceptable groups of sub-carriers in
`a radio communication system. A remote unit receives a
`signal as more than one sub-carrier signal from a base
`station. The remote unit determines a channel quality (such
`as a signal to interference ratio or a reciprocal of an error
`rate) of each group of sub-carrier signals, and compares the
`channel quality of each group of sub-carrier signals with a
`threshold. A sequence of numbers is generated, there being
`one number for each group of sub-carrier signals. Each
`35 number has a value belonging to a first set of values if the
`channel quality of the corresponding group of sub-carriers is
`above the threshold, and has a value belonging to a second
`set of values if the channel quality of the corresponding
`group of sub-carriers is not above the threshold, the two sets
`40 of values having no values in common. The first set of values
`may consist of the value one and the second set of values
`may consist of the value zero, in which case each number in
`the sequence has a length of one bit. The remote unit
`generates at least one value by which the base station can
`45 determine one or more Link Modes, a Link Mode being a set
`of transmission parameters. The remote unit transmits the
`sequence of numbers and the values by which the base
`station can determine the Link Mode or Link Modes.
`The remote unit may calculate the average channel quality
`of groups of sub-carriers whose channel quality is above the
`threshold, in which case the average channel quality is
`transmitted to the base station. The remote unit may also
`determine a Link Mode using the average channel quality, in
`which case the Link Mode is transmitted to the base station.
`The remote unit may alternatively determine a Link Mode
`for each group of sub-carriers whose channel quality is
`above the threshold, in which case the sequence of numbers
`and the values by which the base station can determine the
`Link Mode of each sub-carrier whose channel quality is
`above the threshold is transmitted. In the latter case, the
`sequence of numbers and the values by which the base
`station can determine the Link Modes can be combined into
`a single sequence of numbers.
`The present invention also provides a method of assigning
`transmission tasks to at least one sub-carrier in a radio
`communication system. A base station receives a return
`signal, and extracts from the return signal a sequence of
`
`IPR2018-1555
`HTC EX1005, Page 8
`
`

`

`US 6,721,569 Bl
`
`3
`numbers, each number corresponding to one group of sub(cid:173)
`carriers, and at least one value by which the base station can
`determine at least one Link Mode. The base station deter(cid:173)
`mines at least one Link Mode based on the at least one value.
`The base station defines a set of acceptable groups of
`sub-carriers as all groups of sub-carriers for which the
`corresponding number has a value belonging to a first set of
`values, and defines a set of unacceptable groups of sub(cid:173)
`carriers as all groups of sub-carriers for which the corre(cid:173)
`sponding number has a value belonging to a second set of
`values, the two sets of values having no values in common.
`The base station allocates for data transmission at one of the
`Link Modes the sub-carriers which belong to the groups of
`sub-carriers within the set of acceptable groups of sub(cid:173)
`carriers. In one embodiment, the return signal includes an 15
`average channel quality and the base station determines a
`single Link Mode based on the average channel quality. In
`another embodiment, the return signal includes a reference
`to a Link Mode and the base station determines a single Link
`Mode based on the reference to the Link Mode. In yet 20
`another embodiment, the return signal includes references to
`one Link Mode for each acceptable group of sub-carriers,
`possibly within the sequence of numbers, and the base
`station determines a Link Mode for each acceptable group of
`sub-carriers based on the corresponding reference. The base 25
`station may allocate for low sensitivity data transmission
`sub-carriers within some of the unacceptable sub-carriers,
`may allocate for data transmission at a low transmission rate
`sub-carriers within some of the remaining unacceptable
`sub-carriers, and may divert transmission power from the 30
`remaining unused unacceptable sub-carriers to other sub-
`earners.
`The method provides improved efficiency of a commu(cid:173)
`nication system by allowing sub-carriers having a high
`signal to interference ratio to use a higher transmission rate.
`Sub-carriers having a low signal to interference ratio can be
`used for less sensitive traffic, or their transmission power can
`be diverted to sub-carriers having a high signal to interfer(cid:173)
`ence ratio.
`Other aspects and features of the present invention will
`become apparent to those ordinarily skilled in the art upon
`review of the following description of specific embodiments
`of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying
`figures.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`The invention will now be described in greater detail with
`reference to the accompanying diagrams, in which:
`FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a portion of a radio
`communication system in which the invention is imple(cid:173)
`mented;
`FIG. 2 is a chart of example signal to interference ratios
`in several sub-carriers;
`FIG. 3 is a flow chart of a method by which a remote unit
`determines and conveys information concerning acceptable
`sub-carriers to a base station;
`FIG. 4 is a flow chart of a method by which a base station
`makes use of information concerning acceptable sub(cid:173)
`carriers;
`FIG. 5 is a flow chart of an alternative method by which
`a remote unit determines and conveys information concern(cid:173)
`ing acceptable sub-carriers to a base station; and
`FIG. 6 is a flow chart of an alternative method by which
`a base station makes use of information concerning accept(cid:173)
`able sub-carriers.
`
`4
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
`Referring to FIG. 1, a portion of a radio communication
`system is shown. The radio communication system employs
`5 a plurality of sub-carriers to transmit traffic from a base
`station 10 to a remote unit 16. For example, the radio
`communication system may employ Orthogonal Frequency
`Division Multiplexing. A signal generator 36 within the base
`station 10 generates a signal 12. The signal is transmitted
`10 through a base station transmitting antenna 14. Each sub(cid:173)
`carrier carries data encoded with a Link Mode. A Link Mode
`is a set of at least one transmission parameter, such as a
`modulation level, a coding rate, a symbol rate, a transmis(cid:173)
`sion power level, antenna directional parameters, or space-
`time coding parameters. The signal 12 propagates along a
`forward link to the remote unit 16, where it is received at a
`remote unit receiving antenna 18 as a received signal. A Fast
`Fourier Transform (FFT) processor 20 within the remote
`unit 16 separates the received signal into a plurality of
`sub-carrier signals, there being one sub-carrier signal for
`each sub-carrier. A decoder 22 within the remote unit
`decodes the sub-carrier signals to produce received data.
`Each sub-carrier signal is decoded using a Link Mode
`appropriate to the sub-carrier of the sub-carrier signal. The
`decoded data is then passed to a user 24.
`The sub-carrier signals are also passed to a sub-carrier
`analysis processor 26 within the remote unit. The sub-carrier
`analysis processor 26 measures a signal to interference ratio
`(S/I) of each sub-carrier signal. The sub-carrier analysis
`processor 26 compares the S/I of each sub-carrier signal
`with a threshold to determine which sub-carriers are accept-
`able sub-carriers. Acceptable sub-carriers are sub-carriers
`for which the measured S/1 of the corresponding sub-carrier
`signal is higher than the threshold. Sub-carriers for which
`35 the measured S/I of the corresponding sub-carrier signal is
`not higher than the threshold are unacceptable sub-carriers.
`The sub-carrier analysis processor 26 calculates an average
`S/1 of the S/Is of the acceptable sub-carriers. Referring to
`FIG. 2, an example set of S/ls is shown. A horizontal axis 40
`40 indicates a sub-band number of each of twelve sub-carriers.
`A vertical axis 42 indicates the S/1 in dB of the sub-carrier
`signals. If a threshold 44 having a value of 4 dB is used, then
`the sub-carrier analysis processor 26 will identify eight of
`the sub-carriers (sub-band numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, and
`45 12) as being acceptable sub-carriers. The sub-carrier analy(cid:173)
`sis processor 26 calculates the average S/1 of the acceptable
`sub-carriers in FIG. 2 as having a value of 9.1 dB, whereas
`the average S/1 of all sub-carriers in FIG. 2 would be 6.8 dB.
`Returning to FIG. 1, the remote unit 16 transmits a return
`50 signal 30 along a reverse link to the base station 10 through
`a remote unit transmitting antenna 28, which may or may not
`be the same antenna as the remote unit receiving antenna 18.
`The return signal 30 includes the average S/1 of acceptable
`sub-carriers and a sequence of numbers identifying the
`55 acceptable sub-carriers. If a value of "1" is used to identify
`acceptable sub-carriers and a value of "O" is used to identify
`unacceptable sub-carriers, or the reverse, then the sequence
`of numbers can be a bitmask, using one bit to indicate the
`acceptability of each sub-carrier. Of course other values can
`60 be used to indicate which sub-carriers are acceptable and
`which sub-carriers are unacceptable, but then more bits are
`required in the sequence of numbers for each sub-carrier. In
`the example of FIG. 2, the remote unit 16 would transmit an
`average S/1 having a value of 9.1 dB and a bitmask having
`65 a value of "111110000111".
`The return signal 30 is received by the base station 10 at
`a base station receiving antenna 32, which may or may not
`
`IPR2018-1555
`HTC EX1005, Page 9
`
`

`

`US 6,721,569 Bl
`
`5
`be the same antenna as the base station transmitting antenna
`14. An extractor 33 within the base station extracts the
`average S/I from the return signal 30 and passes it to a Link
`Mode evaluator 34 within the base station. The extractor 33
`also extracts the bitmask from the return signal 30 and
`passes it to the signal generator 36. The extractor 33 is a
`processor. The Link Mode evaluator 34 selects an optimum
`Link Mode based on the average S/I received from the
`remote unit 16 and on requirements of the communication
`system, such as an acceptable bit error rate. The Link Mode
`evaluator 34 is a processor, and may be combined with the
`extractor 33. The optimum Link Mode is passed to the signal
`generator 36 within the base station, along with the bitmask
`from the extractor 33 and along with data 38 which is to be
`transmitted.
`The signal generator 36 encodes the data 38 using the
`optimum Link Mode, and generates a new signal. The signal
`generator 36 differentiates the sub-carriers into a set of
`acceptable sub-carriers and a set of unacceptable sub(cid:173)
`carriers. The new signal only codes the data 38 over the 20
`acceptable sub-carriers. Whether a particular sub-carrier is
`acceptable or unacceptable is determined from the bitmask,
`or more generally from the sequence of numbers, most
`recently received from the remote unit 16. Each unaccept(cid:173)
`able sub-carrier can be allocated for one of several uses. 25
`Zero or more of the unacceptable sub-carriers are used to
`transmit low sensitivity traffic encoded using the optimum
`Link Mode. Low sensitivity traffic can include inessential
`but potentially useful information, such as control bits or
`parity bits. Although unacceptable sub-carriers have a low
`S/I and may have a high bit error rate when received by the
`remote unit, the low sensitivity of the traffic transmitted over
`these sub-carriers means that some errors are tolerable. Zero
`or more of the remaining unacceptable sub-carriers are used
`to transmit low rate traffic using a second Link Mode having
`a lower transmission rate than the optimum Link Mode. Any
`remaining unacceptable sub-carriers are unused, and power
`that would otherwise be used to transmit information over
`the unused unacceptable sub-carriers is assigned to other
`sub-carriers.
`Referring to FIG. 3, a method by which the remote unit 16
`determines the acceptable sub-carriers and the average S/I is
`shown. The remote unit receives a signal at step 80 at the
`remote unit receiving antenna 18. At step 82 the signal is
`separated into its sub-carrier signals by the FFT processor
`20. The first sub-carrier is selected at step 84. At step 86 the
`S/I of the sub-carrier signal of the selected sub-carrier is
`measured. If at step 88 the measured S/I is higher than a
`threshold, then the selected sub-carrier is an acceptable
`sub-carrier. At step 90 a running total is increased by the
`measured S/I, a count of acceptable sub-carriers is increased
`by one, and the sequence of numbers, preferably a bitmask,
`is adjusted to identify the selected sub-carrier as being an
`acceptable sub-carrier. If at step 92 there are further sub(cid:173)
`carriers, then at step 94 the next sub-carrier is selected and 55
`the algorithm returns to step 86 to measure the S/I of
`sub-carrier signal of the next sub-carrier. If at step 92 there
`are no further sub-carriers, then at step 96 the average S/I of
`acceptable sub-carriers is calculated as the running total
`divided by the count of acceptable sub-carriers. Steps 82 to 60
`96 are carried out by the sub-carrier analysis processor 26.
`At step 98 the average S/I and the sequence of numbers are
`transmitted to the base station through the remote unit
`transmitting antenna 28. Steps 84, 92, and 94 form a loop
`that cycles through each sub-carrier, although any method of 65
`measuring the S/I of each sub-carrier signal could be used.
`Steps 90 and 96 calculate the average S/I, although any
`
`6
`method of calculating the average S/I could be used. For
`example, the count of the acceptable sub-carriers could be
`determined at step 96 from the sequence of numbers.
`Referring to FIG. 4, a method by which the base station
`5 uses the sub-carriers is shown. At step 120 the base station
`receives a return signal at the base station receiving antenna
`32. At step 122 the sequence of numbers, preferably a
`bitmask, and the average S/I are extracted from the return
`signal by the extractor 33. At step 124 the Link Mode
`10 evaluator 34 selects an optimum Link Mode based on the
`average S/I. At step 126 the base station receives data to be
`transmitted. The first sub-carrier is selected at step 128. At
`step 130 the base station determines whether the selected
`sub-carrier is an acceptable sub-carrier by comparing the
`15 sub-band number of the sub-carrier with the sequence of
`numbers. For example, if the sequence of numbers is a
`bitmask with a value of "111110001111" and the selected
`sub-carrier was the first sub-carrier, then a comparison of the
`sub-band number and the bitmask would produce a value of
`"1" since that is the value of the first bit, and the selected
`sub-carrier would therefore be an acceptable sub-carrier. If
`the selected sub-carrier was the sixth sub-carrier, then a
`comparison of the sub-band number and the bitmask would
`produce a value of "O" since that is the value of the sixth bit,
`and the selected sub-carrier would therefore be an unaccept(cid:173)
`able sub-carrier. If at step 130 the base station determines
`that the selected sub-carrier is an acceptable sub-carrier, then
`at step 132 the data is encoded for transmission over the
`selected sub-carrier using the optimum Link Mode. If at step
`30 130 the base station determines that the selected sub-carrier
`is an unacceptable sub-carrier, then at step 134 low sensi(cid:173)
`tivity data is encoded for transmission over the selected
`sub-carrier using the optimum Link Mode. Alternatively, at
`step 134 regular data could be encoded for transmission over
`35 the selected sub-carrier at a second Link Mode having a
`lower transmission rate than the optimum Link Mode, or no
`data could be encoded for transmission over the selected
`sub-carrier and the transmission power of the selected
`sub-carrier diverted to other sub-carriers. If at step 136 there
`40 are further sub-carriers, then at step 138 the next sub-carrier
`is selected and the algorithm returns to step 130 to determine
`whether the next sub-carrier is an acceptable sub-carrier. If
`at step 136 there are no further sub-carriers, then at step 140
`the signal is transmitted to the receiver. Steps 128 to 138 are
`45 carried out by the signal generator 36. Steps 128, 136, and
`138 form a loop that cycles through each sub-carrier,
`although any method of determining which sub-carriers are
`acceptable sub-carriers could be used.
`Signalling overhead can be reduced in a number of ways.
`50 Overhead on the forward link from the base station to the
`remote unit can be reduced if the remote unit calculates the
`optimum Link Mode itself, using an algorithm similar to that
`used by the Link Mode evaluator 34. After a delay sufficient
`to allow the return signal 30 to reach the base station and to
`allow the signal 12 carrying a frame encoded using the
`optimum Link Mode to reach the remote unit, the decoder 22
`decodes frames using the optimum Link Mode. The base
`station need not transmit the optimum Link Mode to the
`remote unit. If the frames include numbered packets, then
`synchronization of the optimum Link Mode can be achieved
`more precisely if the remote unit includes a packet number
`in the return signal rather than estimating the delay. The base
`station begins using the optimum Link Mode when it
`transmits a packet having the packet number identified in the
`return signal, and the remote unit begins using the optimum
`Link Mode when it receives a packet having the packet
`number identified in the return signal.
`
`IPR2018-1555
`HTC EX1005, Page 10
`
`

`

`US 6,721,569 Bl
`
`7
`Overhead on the reverse link can be reduced if the remote
`unit calculates the optimum Link Mode itself and transmits
`a reference to the optimum Link Mode to the base station,
`as disclosed in a U.S. patent application entitled "Receiver
`based adaptive modulation scheme" by Hashem et al., filed
`on Sep. 27, 2000, and assigned to the assignee of the present
`application, and incorporated by reference herein. The return
`signal can be viewed more generally as including a sequence
`of numbers identifying acceptable sub-carriers, and a value
`by which the base station can determine an optimum Link
`Mode. The value by which the base station can determine an
`optimum Link Mode may be the average S/I, as described
`above. Alternatively, if the remote unit determines the
`optimum Link Mode itself, then the value may be a refer(cid:173)
`ence to the optimum Link Mode. If the optimum Link Mode
`is one of a set of allowed Link Modes agreed upon by the
`base station and the remote unit prior to a transmission, the
`reference may be an index to the optimum Link Mode within
`the set of allowed Link Modes. The return signal 30 contains
`the sequence of numbers and the reference, but not the
`average S/I of acceptable sub-carriers. The extractor 33 20
`simply extracts the reference to the optimum Link Mode
`from the return signal 30 at step 122, and the Link Mode
`evaluator 34 determines the optimum Link Mode at step 124
`from the set of allowed Link Modes using the reference.
`A different Link Mode can be used for each acceptable 25
`sub-carrier if the Link Modes are calculated by the remote
`unit and transmitted to the base station. In this embodiment,
`the remote unit transmits more than one value by which the
`base station can determine more than one Link Mode,
`preferably as a sequence of references to sub-carrier Link 30
`Modes. The sequence of numbers identifying the acceptable
`sub-carriers and the values by which the base station can
`determine the Link Modes can be sent along the return
`channel separately, or can be combined by forming the
`sequence of numbers from the sub-carrier Link Mode of 35
`each acceptable sub-carrier and one or more distinct values
`identifying unacceptable sub-carriers. If in the example of
`FIG. 2 a S/I of 10 dB or higher (for example) allows use of
`a seventh Link Mode within the set of allowed Link Modes,
`a S/I of 7 dB or higher allows use of a sixth Link Mode 40
`within the set of allowed Link Modes, and a S/I of 4 dB or
`higher allows use of a fifth Link Mode within the set of
`allowed Link Modes ( a higher ordinal rank of Link Mode
`having a higher transmission rate), then the remote unit
`transmits a sequence of numbers having a value of 45
`"777660000567" to the base station along the reverse link.
`A number having a value of "O" indicates that the corre(cid:173)
`sponding sub-carrier is unacceptable, and a number having
`a value other than zero indicates both that the corresponding
`sub-carrier is acceptable and the Link Mode to be used when 50
`encoding data for transmission over that sub-carrier. The
`method carried out by the remote unit is shown in FIG. 5.
`The method shown in FIG. 5 is similar to the method shown
`in FIG. 3, except that the average S/I is not calculated
`( eliminating steps 90 and 96), a sub-carrier Link Mode is
`evaluated for each sub-carrier (adding steps 89 and 91), and
`the average S/I is not included in the return signal (replacing
`step 98 with step 99). At step 89 a Link Mode evaluator (not
`shown in FIG. 1, and which may or may not be a component
`of the sub-carrier analysis processor) in the remote unit
`determines the Link Mode for the selected sub-carrier based
`on the S/I of the selected sub-carrier measured at step 86, as
`disclosed in patent application entitled "Receiver based
`adaptive modulation scheme". At step 91 the sequence of
`references to sub-carrier Link Modes is adjusted by setting
`the corresponding number in the sequence of numbers to be
`a reference to the Link Mode determined at step 89.
`
`8
`The method carried out by the base station in the embodi(cid:173)
`ment in which the Link Mode of each acceptable sub-carrier
`is transmitted to the base station i

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket