throbber
The NEW ENGLAND JOURNALof MEDICINE
`
`
`
`ORIGINAL ARTICLE
`
`Efficacy ofLenalidomide in Myelodysplastic
`Syndromes
`
`Alan List, M.D., Sandy Kurtin, C.N.P., M.S., Denise J. Roe, Dr.P.H.,
`Andrew Buresh, M.D., Daruka Mahadevan, M.D., Ph.D., Deborah Fuchs, M.D.,
`Lisa Rimsza, M.D., Ruth Heaton, B.S., Robert Knight, M.D.,
`and Jerome B. Zeldis, M.D.
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`Ineffective erythropoiesis is the hallmark ofmyelodysplastic syndromes. Management
`ofthe anemia caused by ineffective erythropoiesis is difficult. In patients with myelo-
`dysplastic syndromes and symptomatic anemia, we evaluated the safety and hemato-
`logic activity oflenalidomide,a novel analogueofthalidomide.
`
`METHODS
`
`Forty-three patients with transfusion-dependent or symptomatic anemia received le-
`nalidomide at doses of25 or 10 mg perday or of10 mgperday for 21 days ofevery 28-
`daycycle. All patients either had had no response to recombinanterythropoietin or had
`a high endogenouserythropoietin level with a low probability of benefit from such
`therapy. The response to treatmentwasassessed after 16 weeks.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, the mostcommonadverseevents, with respective
`frequencies of65 percent and 74 percent, necessitatedthe interruption oftreatmentor
`a dose reduction in 25 patients (58 percent). Other adverse events were mild andinfre-
`quent. Twenty-four patients had a response (56 percent): 20 had sustained indepen-
`dencefrom transfusion, 1 had an increase in the hemoglobinlevel ofmore than 2 g per
`deciliter, and 3 had more than a 50 percentreduction in the needfor transfusions. The
`responserate was highest amongpatients with a clonal interstitial deletion involving
`chromosome 5q31.1 (83 percent, as compared with 57 percent amongthose with a
`normal karyotype and 12 percent amongthose with other karyotypic abnormalities;
`P=0,007) and patients with lower prognostic risk. Of20 patients with karyotypic ab-
`normalities, 11 had at least a 50 percent reduction in abnormal cells in metaphase, in-
`cluding 10 (50 percent) with a complete cytogenetic remission. After a median follow-
`up of 81 weeks, the median duration of transfusion independence had not been
`reached and the median hemoglobin level was 13.2 g perdeciliter (range, 11.5 to 15.8).
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`
`Lenalidomide has hematologic activity in patients with low-risk myelodysplastic syn-
`dromes whohave no response to erythropoietin or whoare unlikely to benefit from
`conventional therapy.
`
`From the Department ofInterdisciplinary
`Oncology, University of South Florida and
`the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Re-
`search Institute, Tampa (A.L., R.H.); the
`Departments of Medicine and Pathology,
`University ofArizona College of Medicine,
`Tucson (S.K., A.B., D.M., D.F., L.R.); the
`Mel and Enid Zuckerman Arizona College
`of Public Health, Tucson (D.J.R.); and Cel-
`gene, Warren, N.J. (R.K., J.B.Z.). Address
`reprint requeststo Dr. List at the Hemato-
`logic Malignancies Program, SRB Rm.
`24038, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and
`Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr.
`Tampa, FL 33612-9497, or at
`listaf@
`moffitt.usf.edu.
`
`N Engl J Med 2005;352:549-57.
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts MedicalSociety.
`
`N ENGL J MED 352;6 WWW.NEJM.ORG FEBRUARY 10, 2005
`
`549
`
`Redd
`r
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org on September 26, 2018. For personal use only. RS Reo ses WII
`"S Laboratories Inc. v. Celgene Corp.
`out permission. 15299 18.01509
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`Exhibit 2029, Page 1
`
`

`

`The NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL of MEDICINE
`
`EFRACTORYANEMIA RESULTING FROM
`J > }
`ineffective hematopoiesis is the principal
`:~ /
`.». “\.therapeutic challenge for patients with
`myelodysplastic syndromes. Recombinanteryth-
`ropoietin alone or in combination with myeloid
`growth factors ameliorates anemia in somepatients
`but is generally ineffective in patients who require
`two or more red-cell transfusions per month; its
`use rarely induces cytogenetic remissions.»
`Hematopoietic precursors in patients with mye-
`lodysplastic syndromes have an accelerated cell-
`cycle transition and impaired responsiveness to cy-
`tokine stimulation.** Survival signals from the
`microenvironmentare compromised, owing in part
`to the presence ofangiogenic molecules, disruption
`of the medullary architecture, and excess produc-
`tion ofinflammatory cytokines.> ?° Thalidomide, a
`multifunctional inhibitor of angiogenesis and an
`immune modulator, restores erythropoiesis andre-
`duces transfusion dependence in approximately 18
`percent of patients who have no responseto re-
`combinanterythropoietin.** ** However, long-term
`treatment and dose escalation are limited by the
`drug’s sedative and neurologic effects. Lenalido-
`mide is a novel 4-amino-glutarimide analogue of
`thalidomide that is more potent but does not have
`the neurotoxic and teratogenic effects of thalido-
`mide.+> 1” We report theresults ofa safety and effi-
`cacy study oflenalidomide in patients with myelo-
`dysplastic syndromes.
`
`
`METHODS
`
`PATIENTS
`
`Eligible patients had received a histologically con-
`firmed diagnosis of a primary myelodysplastic
`syndrome according to French—American-British
`(FAB) criteria (Fig. 1)*® more than three months
`before enrollmentand a diagnosis ofeither symp-
`tomatic anemia (defined by a hemoglobin level of
`less than 10.0 g perdeciliter) or tansfusion-depen-
`dent anemia (defined by the need forat least 4 units
`ofred cells within eight weeks before enrollment).
`Hematologic values obtained during the eightweeks
`preceding study treatmentserved as a reference
`for the assessmentofresponse.Patients either had
`had no response to treatment with recombinant
`erythropoietin or had an endogenousserum level
`of more than 500 mU permilliliter. Patients with
`severe neutropenia (defined by an absolute neutro-
`phil count ofless than 500 per cubic millimeter),
`
`severe thrombocytopenia (defined by a platelet
`countof less than 10,000 per cubic millimeter),
`treatment-related myelodysplastic syndromes, or
`clinically significant coexisting medical illnesses
`were excluded.
`
`STUDY DESIGN
`
`This open-label, single-center trial evaluated the
`safety and efficacy oflenalidomide in patients with
`myelodysplastic syndromes who had symptomatic
`anemia. All patients gave written informed consent,
`and the study was approvedbythe institutional re-
`view board ofthe University ofArizona. Theprinci-
`pal investigator designed and conducted the study,
`analyzed the data, and wrote the article in consulta-
`tion with Celgene. Lenalidomide (Revlimid) was
`supplied by Celgene as 5-mg or 25-mg capsules.
`Three oral dosing schedules were sequentially evalu-
`ated: 25 mgdaily, 10 mgdaily, and 10 mg daily for21
`days ofevery 28-day cycle. Treatmentwasinterrupt-
`ed in the event ofadverse events ofgrade3 or higher
`according to the CommonToxicity Criteria of the
`National Cancer Institute and resumedat the next
`lower doseafter the resolution of these effects.19
`Sequential dose reductions were asfollows: 10 mg
`per day, 10 mgperdayfor 21 days, 5 mgperday,
`5 mg perday for 21 days, and 5 mg every otherday.
`Complete blood counts were obtained every two
`weeks, with the response to treatment and adverse
`events assessed every four weeks. Bone marrow as-
`piration, biopsy, and cytogenetic analysis were re-
`peated every eight weeks. Thefinal response was
`assessedafter 16 weeksoftherapy. Patients with a
`responsecontinued taking lenalidomideuntil dis-
`ease progression,treatmentfailure, or dose-limiting
`adverse events occurred. Patients with hemato-
`logic improvementthatdid not qualify as a proto-
`col-defined responseafter 16 weeks could receive
`8 additional weeks of treatment before the final
`assessmentof response, whereas patients with-
`outa response who had beenfollowing the 21-day
`treatment schedule were offered continual dosing.
`Red-cell transfusions were administered accord-
`ing to prestudyclinical indicators with the following
`guidelines: 2 units were given to patients with a he-
`matocrit of less than 25 percent, 3 units to those
`with a hematocrit ofless than 21 percent, and 4 units
`to those with a hematocrit ofless than 18 percent.
`Myeloid growth factors for the managementofan
`exacerbation of neutropenia were the only cyto-
`kines permitted.
`
`550
`
`N ENGL J MED 352;6 WWW.NEJM.ORG FEBRUARY 10, 2005
`
`Inc. v. Celgene Cor
`Reddy's Lahoratories,
`5,
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org on September 26, 2018. For personal use only. RSReo ses Laboral permission. PRO! 8-01 B00
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`Exhibit 2029, Page 2
`
`

`

`LENALIDOMIDE FOR MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES
`
`
`
`Figure 1. Characteristics of Myelodysplastic Syndromes.
`The bone marrow aspirate in patients with myelodysplasia is hypercellular, reflecting trilineal dysplasia (Panel A; Wright-
`Giemsastain). In this specimen, hypolobated megakaryocytes and hyposegmented neutrophils are prominent. Myeloid
`maturationis shifted to theleft, and myeloblasts may be increased, as shownin Panel B in a patient with refractory
`anemiawith excess blasts (Wright-Giemsastain). Dyserythropoiesis accompanies the hypolobated megakaryocytes and
`hyposegmented neutrophils. There may bea left-sided shift in erythroid maturation, nuclear budding, megaloblastic
`changes, and as shown in PanelC, a decrease in the numberoferythroid precursors (Wright-Giemsastain). The cellu-
`larity ofa core-biopsy specimen can approach 100 percent, with readily apparent dysplasia (Panel D; hematoxylin and
`eosin). (Provided by Lynn Moscinski, M.D., H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and ResearchInstitute, Tampa,Fla.)
`
`ASSESSMENT OF RESPONSE AND ADVERSE EVENTS
`
`The hematologic response was assessed according
`to the modified criteria ofthe International Working
`Group,with the requirementthat an improvement
`had to be sustained for at least eight consecutive
`weeks,”° A majorerythroid response was defined
`as freedom from the need for transfusionor an in-
`crease in the hemoglobin level ofmore than 2 g per
`deciliter in patients with transfusion-independent
`anemia. A minor response wasdefined as at least a
`50 percent reductionin transfusions ora sustained
`elevation in the hemoglobin level of 1 to 2 g per
`deciliter. A major cytogenetic response wasdefined
`by the absence ofthe pretreatment cytogenetic ab-
`normality on standard metaphase analysis (e.g., at
`least 20 cells in metaphase), and a minor response
`
`by a reduction in the number of abnormal cells in
`metaphase ofatleast 50 percent. Cytogenetic pro-
`gression wasdefined as the sustained acquisition
`ofa new chromosomal abnormality.
`Responses were compared by means ofthe Inter-
`national Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), which
`assessesthe percentageofblasts in bone marrow,
`the karyotype, and the number ofcytopenias.?*
`Blinded review ofbone marrow specimens wasper-
`formed by two investigators. Immunohistochemi-
`cal staining ofbiopsy specimensandclot sections
`used monoclonal antibodies against IgG2a (Ven-
`tana Medical Systems) recognizing CD3(PSI clone)
`and CD20 (L26 clone) antigens. Cytologic dyspla-
`sia was graded with the use ofa 10 percentthresh-
`old. Adverse events were graded with the use ofthe
`
`N ENGL J MED 352;6 WWW.NEJM.ORG FEBRUARY 10, 2005
`
`551
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`.
`Downloaded from nejm.org on September 26, 2018. For personal use only. RSReddy'sLaboratories Inc. v. Celgene Corp.
`ut permission.
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`exhibsoneage3
`
`

`

`The NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL of MEDICINE
`
`ofthe 43 Patients.*
`
`Characteristic
`
`Age— yr
`Median
`
`Range
`
`Sex — no. (%)
`Male
`
`Female
`FABclass — no. (%)
`Refractory anemia
`
`Refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts
`Refractory anemia with excess blasts
`
`Refractory anemia with excess blasts
`in transformation
`
`Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
`IPSSrisk category — no.(%)
`Low
`
`Intermediate 1
`
`Intermediate 2
`High
`Transfusion dependence
`
`72
`
`28-85
`
`25 (58)
`
`18 (42)
`
`20 (47)
`
`13 (30)
`8 (19)
`
`1 (2)
`
`1 (2)
`
`22 (51)
`
`16 (37)
`
`4 (9)
`1 (2)
`
` Table 1. Clinical and Hematologic Characteristics
`
`CommonToxicity Criteria of the National Cancer
`Institute.?9
`
`STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
`
`The duration oftransfusion independencewascal-
`culated from the date ofthe last red-cell transfusion
`to the resumption oftransfusion through April 1,
`2004, according to the method ofKaplan and Mei-
`er.?? The duration of major responsesin transfu-
`sion-independentpatients was recorded from the
`initial date of the sustained elevation in hemoglo-
`bin levels of more than 2 g per deciliter. The analy-
`ses ofadverse events and response were carried out
`according to the intention-to-treat principle. Uni-
`variate comparisons were performedwith the use
`of Fisher’s exact test, a two-sample independent
`t-test, or a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The duration
`oftransfusion independence was compared among
`the groups by meansofthe log-ranktest.All report-
`ed P valuesare two-sided. Data are reported as me-
`dians +SD.
`
`
`RESULTS
`
`From March 2002 to August 2003, 55 candidates
`were screened and 43 were enrolled. Thirty-three
`patients (77 percent) had refractory anemia or re-
`fractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts, and 38
`(88 percent) hadIPSSrisk scores oflow or interme-
`diate 1 (Table 1). Overall, 74 percent were transfu-
`sion-dependent, 33 (77 percent) had had no re-
`sponseto treatmentwitherythropoietin, and 13 (30
`percent) had had noresponse to treatment with
`thalidomide. None hadreceived cytotoxic therapy.
`The median numberofprior nontransfusiontreat-
`ments was 1.7 (range, 0 to 5). Moderate-to-severe
`neutropenia waspresent in 28 percentofpatients,
`and moderate-to-severe thrombocytopenia in 23
`percent ofpatients; 37 percent had at least two
`cytopenias. Twenty patients (46 percent) had clonal
`karyotypic abnormalities (defined by the presence
`of at least two abnormal cells in metaphase),
`including interstitial deletions of chromosome
`5q31.1 alone (11 patients) or in association with
`trisomy 21(1), an interstitial deletion of chromo-
`some 20q11.2 (2), a complex karyotype (1), and
`other abnormalities (5).
`
`ADVERSE EVENTS
`
`Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the most
`common adverse events (Table 2). Severe myelo-
`suppression (grade 3 or higher) was dose-depen-
`
`No. (%)
`Median no.ofred-cell units transfused/mo
`
`32 (74)
`3
`
`Range
`
`2-6
`
`Pretransfusion hemoglobin level — g/dl
`Transfusion-dependentpatients
`Median
`
`Range
`Other
`
`Median
`
`Range
`Duration of disease — mo
`Median
`
`Range
`
`Neutropenia — no. (%){
`Thrombocytopenia — no. (%)+
`Karyotype — no. (%)
`Normal
`
`Abnormal
`
`29
`
`3-169
`
`12 (28)
`10 (23)
`
`23 (53)
`
`20 (47)
`
`* FAB denotes French-American—British, and IPSS Inter-
`national Prognostic Scoring System.
`+ Neutropenia was defined by an absolute neutrophil
`countof less than 1500 percubic millimeter.
`+ Thrombocytopenia wasdefined by a platelet count of
`less than 100,000 per cubic millimeter.
`
`552
`
`N ENGL J MED 352;6 WWW.NEJM.ORG FEBRUARY 10, 2005
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`RS Reo ses Laboral permission. IPR2018-01509
`r. Reddy’s Laboratories,
`Inc. v. Celgene Corp.
`Downloaded from nejm.org on September 26, 2018. For personal use only.
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`Exhibit 2029, Page 4
`
`

`

`LENALIDOMIDE FOR MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES
`
`Table 2. Treatment-Associated Adverse Events.
`
`Adverse Event
`
`Neutropenia
`
`Thrombocytopenia
`Pruritus
`
`Diarrhea
`
`Urticaria
`
`Fatigue
`
`Bonepain
`Pneumonia
`
`Edema
`
`Hypothyroidism
`Hypogonadism
`Myalgias
`
`Autoimmunehemolytic anemia
`me&wOOOFOOOYNCO
`ooolcUcrUWmUChUMUCUCOUCUNCOCUNHTNOYHYOO
`oocococluUcOCUMrmPpDmCOFCOOoOCUcUDUOmUmN
`oorNRCOOFKYF&FNYLSSF
`ooooeoc¢eoeooooeooew
`
`ooocoooenorocrsd
`
`Lenalidomide,
`25 mg/day
`(N=13)
`Grade Grade
`lor2 3o0r4
`
`Lenalidomide,
`10 mg/day
`(N=13)
`Grade Grade
`lor2 30r4
`
`Lenalidomide,
`10 mg/day for 21 days
`(N=17)
`Grade Grade
`lor2 3o0r4
`
`All Patients,
`Any Grade
`(N=43)
`
`io
`
`numberofpatients
`8
`0
`
`io
`
`no. ofpatients (%)
`28 (65)
`
`32 (74)
`
`12 (28)
`
`9 (21)
`
`6 (14)
`
`3 (7)
`
`4 (9)
`
`3 (7)
`
`2 (5)
`
`2 (5)
`
`2 (5)
`
`1 (2)
`
`1 (2)
`
`dent and necessitated treatment interruption or
`dose reduction in 25 patients (58 percent). Treat-
`ment was interrupted because of myelosuppres-
`sion in 77 percent ofpatients in the 25-mg group
`after a median of4.6 weeks(range, 3 to 9), as com-
`pared with 62 percentofthose whowere receiving
`10 mgdaily (median, 8.5 weeks; range, 2 to 20) and
`47 percent ofthose whowerereceiving 10 mg daily
`for 21 days (median, 6 weeks; range, 1 to 11) (P=
`0.62). The median interval betweenthefirstinter-
`ruption of treatment and the resumption oftreat-
`mentwas 22 daysin each cohort(range, 9 to 55).
`Atweek 8, marrow cellularity was reduced by 75
`percent amongpatients whowerereceiving 25 mg
`oflenalidomide per day, as compared with a reduc-
`tion of12 percentin both 10-mg cohorts. Pneumo-
`nia developed in three patients, one ofwhom had
`worsening ofpreexisting neutropenia. One patient
`was removedfrom the study on day 5 becauseofau-
`toimmune hemolytic anemia with escalating trans-
`fusion requirements that preceded enrollmentin
`the study. There were three deaths, none ofwhich
`were thoughtto be treatment-related: one was due
`to cholecystitis with rupture (day 8), one to splenic
`infarct in a patient with massive splenomegaly (day
`5) and a history ofsuch events, and one to pneumo-
`nia without neutropenia (week 20). All other ad-
`
`verse events were either minor or of moderate se-
`verity.
`Pruritus, generally self-limited andrestricted to
`the scalp, was reported by 28 percent ofpatients
`during the first week of treatment. Isolated and
`transient urticaria was reported by 14 percent of
`patients, whereasa systemic rash with anurticarial
`componentdeveloped in one patient and resolved
`after treatment wasinterrupted. Diarrhea occurred
`in 21 percentofpatients after prolonged treatment
`(more than three months) but was manageable with
`the use ofeither medication for diarrhea or the in-
`terruption of treatment with lenalidomide. Four
`patients required hormone replacement — twofor
`hypothyroidism, and twofor gonadal dysfunction.
`Seven patients discontinued lenalidomide prema-
`turely (before 28 days) because of withdrawal of
`consentby three patients, autoimmune hemolytic
`anemia in one, early myelosuppression in one, and
`early death in two.
`
`HEMATOLOGIC RESPONSE
`
`Twenty-four patients (56 percent) had a response
`(Table 3); 20 of32 transfusion-dependentpatients
`(63 percent) achieved independence from transfu-
`sion. Of11 patients whorequired no transfusions,
`1 had anincrease in the hemoglobinlevel of more
`
`N ENGL J MED 352;6 WWW.NEJM.ORG FEBRUARY 10, 2005
`
`553
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org on September 26, 2018. For personal use only. RSRead LSLahoratones,Inc.Visanore
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`Exhibit 2029, Page 5
`
`

`

`The NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL of MEDICINE
`
`Table 3. Erythroid Responses.
`
`than 2 g perdeciliter. The median time to a response
`increased from 9 weeks in the 25-mg cohort to
`Lenalidomide
`No. of
`11.5 weeks in the cohort given 10 mg perday for 21
`Dose
`Patients
`Erythroid Response
`Weeks to Response
`days. Patients with a major response reached a me-
`
`Major Minor Total Median+SD Range|dian hemoglobinlevel of 13.2+1.4 g perdeciliter
`number(percent)
`(range, 11.5 to 15.8), with acorresponding median
`25 mg/day 9.05.8=2.5-18.5|increase in hemoglobin from baseline of 5.3 g per6 0 6 (46)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10 mg/day 105264==2-17.5|deciliter (range, 4.4 to 8.7). After a medianfollow-6 1 7(54)
`
`
`10 mg/dayfor 6-24|up of81 weeks (range, 42 to 110), the median dura-9 2 =11(65) 1154103
`
`
`
`
`21 days
`i
`j
`had not been reached
`Total
`21 (49)
`3(7)
`24 (56)
`tion ofthe major response
`(more than 48 weeks; range, more than 13 to more
`than 101). Amongthe 21 patients with a majorre-
`sponse, anemia recurred in 4, with the resumption
`oftransfusionsafter intervals of 12, 19, 56, and 74
`weeks. In one of these patients, treatment failure
`
`Table 4. Relation between Clinical and Biologic Features and Erythroid
`=
`
`was associated with karyotypic evolution and sub- No.of—Erythroid
`
`Variable
`
`Sex
`
`Male
`Female
`Race
`White
`Other
`Prior recombinant erythropoietin
`Yes
`No
`Priorthalidomide
`Yes
`No
`FABclass
`Refractory anemia
`Refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts
`Refractory anemia with excess blasts,
`with or without transformation
`.
`.
`.
`Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
`.
`IPSS risk category
`v7
`intermediate 1
`Intermediate 2 or high
`Karyotype
`Del
`(5)(431.1)
`Normal
`Other
`> Grade 3 myelosuppression
`Yes
`No
`
`P
`Patients Response Value;
`no. (%)
`
`0.35
`
`12 (48)
`12 (67)
`
`20 (54)
`4 (67)
`
`16 (48)
`8 (80)
`
`6 (46)
`18 (60)
`
`15 (75)
`6 (46)
`3 (33)
`
`0
`
`15 (68)
`8 (50)
`1 (20)
`
`10 (83)
`13 (57)
`1 (12)
`
`14 (56)
`10(56)
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`i
`
`sequentprogression to leukemia.
`Of10 patients with moderate-to-severe throm-
`bocytopenia, 1 hada sustained improvementin the
`platelet count(i.e., an increase ofmore than 30,000
`per cubic millimeter). Of the 12 patients with neu-
`tropenia, 2 had a sustained increase in the neutro-
`phil count ofmore than 500 per cubic millimeter.
`
`CYTOGENETIC FINDINGS
`The cytogenetic pattern correlated significantly with
`the hematologic response: 83 percent of patients
`with a deletion of5q31.1 had a response, as com-
`pared with 57 percentofthose with a normal kary-
`otype and 12 percentofthose with other cytogenetic
`abnormalities (P=0.007) (Table 4). The FAB cate-
`gory hadnosignificant correlation with response
`(P=0.07), nor did theIPSSrisk category, age, dura-
`tion of disease, or number ofprior treatments
`(Table 4). The median time to a response was
`tae
`.
`.
`.
`morerapid in patients with a deletion of 5q31.1
`.
`:
`(8.0+4.4 weeks; range, 2.5 to 16.0) than in patients
`:
`.
`with a normal karyotype or other karyotypic ab-
`normalities (11.2+6.7 weeks; range, 2.0 to 26.0;
`P=0.029).
`.
`.
`.
`Among20patients with clonal cytogenetic ab-
`normalities, 11 had cytogenetic responses, includ-
`.
`. .
`.
`ing 10 witha complete cytogenetic remission (Table
`5). Ofthese 10 patients, 9 had del(5)(q31.1) and
`1had t(1;22)(q21p11.2). All cytogenetic respons-
`es occurred in patients whoalso had a hematologic
`response. Overall, 10 of 12 patients (83 percent)
`with a 5q31.1 deletion had a cytogenetic response.
`Fluorescence in situ hybridization with the use
`of the 5q31 (EGR1X2)-specific probe (Vysis) con-
`:
`firmed the absence ofthe 5q31.1 deletion among
`200 cells in interphase in eachoffive patients who
`
`* FAB denotes French-American-British, and IPSS International Prognostic
`Scoring System.
`{ Fisher's exact test was used.
`+ Race was determined from patient registration forms.
`
`554
`
`N ENGL J MED 352;6 WWW.NEJM.ORG FEBRUARY 10, 2005
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`;
`.
`Downloaded from nejm.org on September 26, 2018. For personal use only. RSRead LSLahoratones,Inc.Visanore
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`Exhibit 2029, Page 6
`
`

`

`LENALIDOMIDE FOR MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES
`
`had a complete response and whowereevaluated
`by meansofstandard metaphaseanalysis.
`The median timeto a cytogenetic response was
`8 weeks(range, 8 to 24). Of10 patientswith a5q31.1
`deletion, 9 had a cytogenetic responseafter 8 weeks,
`whereas1 patienthad a response at 16 weeks. Four
`patients had transient emergence ofkaryotypically
`unrelated clones, including trisomy 8 (in two), a
`reciprocal translocation [t(12;16)(p13;p13.3)], and
`monosomy7. Sustained acquisition ofkaryotypical-
`ly discordant clones occurred in four patients: three
`patients with remitting disease and a 5q31.1 dele-
`tion hadtranslocations involving the long arm of
`chromosome7 [t(7;11)(q22;q12), t(7;8)(q22;p21),
`and t(7;21)(q31q11.1)] and one patient with a nor-
`mal karyotype before treatment had deletion 20
`(q21q13.1). Only one ofthese four patients had an
`exacerbation of anemia coincident with the ap-
`pearance of the new abnormality and subsequent
`evolution to acute leukemia. All others remained
`free ofthe needfor transfusion.
`
`PATHOLOGICAL RESPONSES
`AND MORPHOLOGIC FINDINGS
`
`Amongsix patients with excess myeloblasts (at least
`5 percent; range, 6 to 21 percent) who could be
`evaluated, three had more than a 50 percent reduc-
`tion in blasts, with a return to the normal range.
`Thepercentageofringed sideroblasts was reduced
`from 36 percent to 11 percent in 1 of 10 patients
`with refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts
`whocould be evaluated. All reductions in myelo-
`blasts and sideroblasts occurred in patients with a
`hematologic response. Only one patient with re-
`fractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts had an in-
`crease in blasts during lenalidomide treatment,
`and this patient was removed from the study after
`16 weeks.
`Serial marrow preparations from 28 patients
`weresuitable for a detailed assessmentofdyspla-
`sia and architecture. The morphologic character-
`istics ofmegakaryocytes became normal aftertreat-
`mentwith lenalidomide in 14 of 22 patients (64
`percent) with pretreatment dysplasia, including
`12 patients with a response; 10 ofthese 12 patients
`had a 5q31.1 deletion (Fig. 2). Lymphoid aggre-
`gates, often multiple and not paratrabecular, were
`detected in 10 of28 patients (36 percent) after le-
`nalidomide treatment(including 5 patients with a
`5q31.1 deletion) and corresponded with a hemato-
`logic response in 7. Lymphoid aggregates were
`composed ofpolytypic B cells and T cells. Dysplas-
`
`Table 5. Cytogenetic Responses According to Chromosomal Abnormality.
`
`Chromosomal Abnormality
`
`Del(5)(q31.1)
`Isolated
`
`Withtrisomy 21
`Del(20)(q11.2)
`t(1;22)(q21p11.2)
`Other*
`
`Total
`
`No. of
`Patients
`
`2=50% Decrease
`in AbnormalCells
`in Metaphase
`
`Complete
`Cytogenetic
`Response
`
`number ofpatients (percent)
`10 (83)
`9 (75)
`
`11 (55)
`
`10 (50)
`
`
`
`
`
`* Other chromosomal abnormalities were as follows: +19, t(3;3)(q21;q26.3),
`+8, -X, and complex.
`
`<
`
`
`
`ase eee
`
`A ia “9u's
`
`
`La >Tews,a
`¢ *Bibee
`emEy?ay
`
`
`Figure 2. Morphologic Changes in a Bone Marrow Specimenfrom a Patient
`with a 5q31.1 Deletion.
`Numerous small, mononuclear megakaryocytesare readily identified in the
`bone marrow specimenobtained by trephinebiopsy before treatment (Panel
`A, hematoxylin and eosin). After 16 weeks of lenalidomide therapy, megakary-
`ocytes appear normalin size and have multiple nuclei (Panel B, hematoxylin
`and eosin), and multiple aggregates of benign-appearing lymphocytes are
`apparent (Panel C, hematoxylin and eosin).
`
`tic erythroid elements and myeloid elements were
`common(present in 22 and 11 patients, respec-
`tively), whereas resolution of cytologic atypia was
`infrequent(occurring in 2) and unrelated to hema-
`tologic response. Reticulin fibrosis resolved after
`lenalidomide treatmentin one oftwo patients with
`extensive fiber deposition in the pretreatmenttre-
`phine-biopsy specimen, concordantwith a hemato-
`logic response. Marrow orperipheral-blood eosin-
`ophilia or both (7.5 percentto 14 percent) developed
`in three patients,including two with a hematologic
`response.
`
`N ENGL J MED 352;6 WWW.NEJM.ORG
`
`FEBRUARY 10, 2005
`
`555
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org on September 26, 2018. For personal use only. RS oO
`Inc. v. Celgene Corp.
`eddy’s Lahoratories,
`ses without permission. IPR2018-01509
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`Exhibit 2029, Page 7
`
`

`

`The NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL of MEDICINE
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`(TNF-a), but selective antagonists of TNF-a have
`minimal clinical activity in myelodysplastic syn-
`dromes.?° 78 Lenalidomideaffects a broad range of
`In this study, lenalidomide had substantial activity
`ligand-induced responsesthat maybe integral to
`in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes who
`its activity in myelodysplastic syndromes,includ-
`had had no responseto treatmentwith erythropoi-
`ing angiogenesis, inflammation,cell adhesion, and
`etin or who had high endogenouserythropoietin
`the immuneresponse. Indeed, vascular endothe-
`levels and therefore a low probability ofbenefit from
`lial growth factor (VEGF) is an autocrine growth
`erythropoietin treatment. Overall, 56 percentofpa-
`tients had a response, with most having sustained
`factor elaborated by myeloid precursors in my-
`elodysplastic syndromes that contributes to their
`independence from the need for transfusion and
`self-renewal while exacerbating ineffective erythro-
`restoration ofhemoglobin tolevels within or near
`poiesis in erythroid progenitors, which lack VEGF
`the normal range. Cytogenetic remissions, which
`receptors.%?9 Lenalidomide enhancescell-mediat-
`occurrarely with erythropoietin therapy, were ob-
`ed immunity by potentiating the production ofin-
`served in 55 percentofpatients. The high rate of
`terleukin-2 and interferon-y andincreasingthere-
`complete cytogenetic response in patients with a
`sponsesofcytolytic T cells and natural killer cells
`5q31.1 deletion (75 percent), which was confirmed
`in experimentsin animals,1>7° Of particularinter-
`by moresensitive fluorescence in situ hybridiza-
`est in our study was the appearanceofmultiple lym-
`tion probes, indicates that this subtype ofmyelo-
`phoid aggregates composed ofa mixture ofB cells
`dysplastic syndromeis especially sensitive to lena-
`
`lidomide treatment. Indeed, the time to response andTcells in the trephine-biopsy specimens from
`patients with a response. Whetherthis finding rep-
`was more rapid in patients with the 5q31.1 dele-
`resents an immuneresponse againstthe ineffective
`tion, and response wasassociated with the disap-
`pearance ofdysplastic megakaryocytes, the mor-
`clone is unknown. Furthermore, lenalidomide sen-
`phologic hallmark of the 5q— syndrome.?? These
`sitizes erythroid progenitors to the trophic effects of
`findings suggest thatlenalidomiderestores red-cell
`recombinanterythropoietin (unpublished data).
`production in part by eliminating ineffective my-
`The promising activity of lenalidomide in my-
`elodysplastic clones but does not extinguish the
`elodysplastic syndromes mustbe balanced against
`myelodysplastic syndrome-initiating stem cell.
`its potential to causeclinically significant myelo-
`Thepersistence ofringed sideroblasts in patients
`suppression, which necessitates close laboratory
`with refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts
`monitoring during the initial weeks oftreatment.
`whohad a response, however, indicates that clonal
`Neutropenia or thrombocytopenia developed in
`suppressionis selective and complemented by the
`more than half the patients and was notlimited to
`patients with preexisting lineage deficits. The ex-
`restoration oferythropoiesis in susceptible myelo-
`dysplastic syndrome progenitors. This notion is
`tent of myelosuppression varied according to the
`supportedby the transient emergenceofkaryotyp-
`dose and cumulative exposure to lenalidomide and
`ically distinct and unrelated clones, which mirrors
`wasreversed by the interruption of treatmentor a
`reduction in the dose. Althoughearly exacerbation
`the experience reported with imatinib treatmentin
`patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.?*?> In ad-
`of cytopenias may be expected with an agent that
`dition, three patients with a5q31.1 deletion acquired
`selectively suppresses myelodysplastic clones that
`new translocations involvingchromosome7 despite
`dominate steady-state hematopoiesis, many pa-
`the complete suppression oftheinitial karyotypic
`tients did not have myelosuppression despite pro-
`abnormality. Despite its unfavorable prognostic im-
`longed lenalidomide treatment. A reduction in
`plication in primary myelodysplastic syndromes,
`marrowcellularity coincided with myelosuppres-
`the clinical significance ofthe acquired transloca-
`sion in patients treated with 25 mgdaily, indicat-
`ing that lenalidomide suppresses myelopoiesis at
`tionsis unclear. Only oneofthese patients had cyto-
`genetic and disease progression, whereas the oth-
`higher doses. At lower doses, however, this effect
`ers had a sustained hematologic response. Further
`was not apparent. Other adverse events were un-
`observation is necessary beforetheclinical signifi-
`common andgenerally mild in severity. Hypothy-
`canceofthesefindings can be determined.
`roidism or gonadal dysfunction developedin four
`patients,raising the possibility that the action ofle-
`Several effects of lenalidomide may contribute
`nalidomide on ligand-induced responses may ex-
`to its activity in myelodysplastic syndromes.It sup-
`presses the production of tumornecrosis factor @
`tend to hypophyseal hormones.
`
`556
`
`N ENGL J MED 352;6 WWW.NEJM.ORG FEBRUARY 10, 2005
`
`Inc. v. Celgene Cor
`Reddy's Lahoratories,
`5,
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org on September 26, 2018. For personal use only. RSReo ses Laboral permission. PRO! 8-01 B00
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`Exhibit 2029, Page 8
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket