throbber
Apoptosis in Bone Marrow Biopsy Samples Involving Stromal and
`Hematopoietic Cells in 50 Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes
`
`By Azra Raza, Sefer Gezer, Suneel Mundle, Xue-Zhi Gao, Sairah Alvi, Raphael Borok, Shelby Rifkin, Amna Iftikhar,
`Vilasini Shetty, Agapi Parcharidou, Jerome Loew, Bridget Marcus, Zaineb Khan, Colette Chaney, John Showel,
`Stephanie Gregory, and Harvey Preisler
`
`Cell-cycle kinetics were measured in situ after infusions of
`iododeoxyuridine and/or bromodeoxyuridine in 50 patients
`with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and the medianla-
`beling index in bone marrow (BM) biopsy samples was
`28.6%. Unfortunately, 26 of 50 patients showed that =75%
`of hematopoietic calls of all three lineages were undergoing
`programmedcell death (PCD) in their biopsy samples as
`shownby thein situ end labeling (ISEL) technique. Ten pa-
`tients had 1/3 and eight had 2/3 ISEL* cells. Stromal cells
`were frequently ISEL* and often S-phase cells were also
`found to be simultaneously ISEL*. Nucleosomal DNA frag-
`ments as a ladder in agarose gel were present in BM aspi-
`
`HE MYELODYSPLASTIC syndromes (MDS) are a
`group of acquired hematopoietic disorders with evi-
`dence oftrilineage dysplasia and an ~30% incidence of
`eventual
`transformation
`into
`acute myeloid leukemia
`(AML),.'? These are clonal disorders involving one or more
`clones,”* and normal hematopoiesis has been shownto si-
`multaneously coexist in the majority of cases.® Patients with
`evidence of ‘‘Abnormally Localized Immature Precursors’’
`(ALIP) in their bone marrow (BM) biopsy samples tend to
`die earlier than ALIP-negative patients because of a rapid
`transformation into acute leukemia.’ Cytogenetic abnormali-
`ties especially involving chromosomes 5 and 7 are com-
`monly detected,® whereas ras-mutationssignifying short sur-
`vival have been showed in ~10% to 40% patients.’ The
`disease is almost invariably fatal, and with the exception of
`BMtransplantation, there is no known cure."
`An apparent paradox in MDSis that patients with these
`disorders have peripheral cytopenias despite frequently hav-
`ing normo- or hypercellular BMs. One possible explanation
`for this contradictory finding may be that even though there
`are large numbers of cells in the BM, they are not exiting
`thal compartment because they are undergoing premature
`programmed cell death (PCD). To examinethis possibility,
`the present study was undertaken to define the incidence of
`PCD in the hematopoietic cells of MDS patients. Apoptosis
`is a gene-directed cellular self-destruction in which intracel-
`
`
`the
`From the Division of Hematology, Rush Cancer Institute,
`Department of Pathology, Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke's Medical
`Center, Chicago; and Northwest Community Hospital, Arlington
`Heights, IL.
`Submitted November 7, 1994; accepted February 9, 1995,
`Supported in part by a Grant No. (ROICA60085) from The Na-
`tional Cancer Institute.
`Address reprint requests to Azra Raza, MD, Professor of Medi-
`cine, Director, Leukemia Program, Rush Cancer Institute, Rush-
`Presbyterian-St Luke's Medical Center, 2242 W Harrison St, Suite
`108, Chicago, IL 60612.
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page
`charge payment. This article must
`therefore be hereby marked
`‘tadvertisement’’ in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734 solely to
`indicate this fact.
`© 1995 by The American Society of Hematology.
`0006-4971/95/8601 -0026$3.00/0
`
`268
`
`rates of four patients who showed high ISEL and were ab-
`sent in two who had noISEL staining in biopsy samples,
`but only when DNA was extracted after a 4-hour in vitro
`incubation in complete medium. Therefore, laddering data
`confirmed the ISEL findings that the majority of hematopoi-
`etic cells in MDS are in early stages of PCD. We conclude
`that extensive intramedullary cell death may explain the par-
`adox of pancytopenia despite hypercellular marrows in MDS
`patients. Investigating approachesthat protect against PCD
`in some MDS subsets would beofinterest.
`© 1995 by The American Society of Hematology.
`
`lular endonucleases initially cleave the DNA into inter-
`nucleosomal fragments (180 to 200 bp ortheir integral multi-
`ples).'"' This process, which begins with fragmentation of
`DNA,endseventually with fragmentation of the nucleus and
`removal of the dead cell by macrophages. Although an end-
`stage karyorrhectic cell
`is easy to recognize under a light
`microscope,
`the earlier stages of PCD with limited DNA
`tragmentation and internucleosomal nicking cannot be mor-
`phologically identified. Thus, large numbers of cells may be
`undergoing apoptosis, yet there may be only a few cells in
`the morphologically identifiable karyorthectic stage. Conse-
`quently, an accurate estimation of the incidence of PCD
`must include a precise quantitation of cells in early stages
`of apoptosis in addition to the obviously karyorrhectic cells.
`The conventional method of detecting typical ‘‘DNA lad-
`dering’’ by gel electrophoresis may not be able to provide
`this information because very little low molecular-weight
`DNA fragments are formed in cells that are in the earlier
`stages of PCD.’* The techniqueofin situ end labeling (ISEL)
`of fragmented DNA appears to be a morereliable measure-
`ment of the early stages of apoptosis.'*'” Therefore, BM
`biopsy samples of 50 MDSpatients were processed for ISEL.
`The results obtained showed an exceptionally high rate of
`apoptosis in the hematopoietic cells ofall three lineages in
`these patients. These data confirmed our inilial hypothesis
`that high intramedullary death of hematopoietic cells may
`be the biologic basis for the paradox of pancytopenia despite
`hypercellular marrows in MDS patients.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Rates of hematopoietic cellular proliferation and apoptosis were
`examined in fifty patients with a confirmed diagnosis of MDS. Each
`patient received a |-hour infusion of bromo- and/or iododeoxyuri-
`dine (BrdU and [UdR) at 100 mg/m’ as per protocols MDS 86-
`15 and/or MDS 90-02. Informed consent was obtained from every
`individual. The infusion protocols were approvedby thelocalInstitu-
`tional Review Board and the Food and Drug Administration and the
`drugs were provided by the National Cancer Institute. Some of these
`patients’ results have also been reported in earlier studies.””*?
`
`Studies of Cellular Proliferation
`
`Immediately at the end of the second thymidine analogue infusion,
`samples of BM aspirate (BM asp) and biopsy were obtained. The
`aspirates were used for the determination of durations of S-phase as
`
`Blood, Vol 86, No 1 (July 1), 1995: pp 268-276
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1018 PAGE1
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1018 PAGE 1
`
`

`

`APOPTOSIS IN BM BIOPSY SAMPLES
`
`described before.4 The BM biopsy samples were embedded in
`plastic using glycol methacrylate. Air-dried 2-3-ym-thick sections
`were placed on Alcian Blue—coated coverslips and processed for the
`estimation of labeling indices using an anti-IUdR/BrdU monoclonal
`antibody (MoAb) as described before.”*”*
`
`Studies to Measurethe Incidence of PCD or
`Apoptosis
`Two methods were used to measure the rale of apoptosis in these
`patients. The in situ end labeling (ISEL) of fragmented DNA as
`described by Wijsman et al'® was modified for use in plastic embed-
`ded biopsy samples for the detection of cells undergoing PCD. BM
`asps from six MDSpatients, three AML patients, and two normal
`controls were examined for the presence of the typical ladder pattern
`in agarose gels. Details of both methods are provided below.
`
`269
`
`mol/L TBSafter each of the above-mentioned incubations. Sections
`were then immersed in the following detection solution for 8 to 10
`minutes at 20°C. It contained Naphthol AS-MX phosphate (20 mg)
`freshly dissolved in 2 mL N,N-dimethylformamide. This was added
`to 100 mL 0.1 mol/L TRIS buffer, pH 8.2 followed by 0.1 mL 1
`mol/L Levamisole and 100 mg of Fast Blue BBsalt (Sigma Chemical
`Co, St Louis, MO). The solution was stirred for 2 minutes and
`filtered before use. Sections were washed in distilled water and
`mounted with Fluoromount.
`
`Control Experiments for ISEL Technique
`Control experiments for ISEL technique included two types of
`controls: negative and positive.
`
`Negative Controls
`ISEL solution devoid of DNA polymerase was used on control
`samples as negative controls. These slides were universally negative.
`
`Positive Controls
`
`Positive controls included DNAladdering versus ISEL of frag-
`mented DNA,detection of apoptosis in BM biopsy samples obtained
`from newly diagnosed high-risk patients with AML, and detection
`of apoptosis in normal BM biopsy samples obtained from patients
`with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL).
`DNA laddering versus ISEL offragmented DNA. HL-60 cells
`were treated with a topoisomerase inhibitor etoposide (VP 16) at a
`concentration of 35 zmol/L/mL in RPMI 1640 medium containing
`20% fetal bovine serum (FBS). The controlcells were incubated in
`the same medium without etoposide. The incubation was continued
`for 4 hours at 37°C in 5% CO). At the end of the incubation, each
`sample was divided into two aliquots. Cells from one aliquot were
`embeddedin plastic, sectioned, and processed for ISEL to determine
`the percentage of apoptotic cells, whereas the other aliquot was used
`for DNA extraction. The DNA so obtained was mun on an agarose
`gel containing ethidium bromide.
`Detection ofapoptosis in BM biopsy samples obtainedfrom newly
`diagnosed high-risk patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
`Twenty AMLbiopsy samples were processed for ISEL beforestart-
`ing remission induction chemotherapy.
`Detection of apoptosis in normal BM biopsy samples obtained
`jrom patients with NHL. Two NHLpatients who had no BM
`involvement and whose BM biopsy samples were judged by hemato-
`pathologists to be indistinguishable from normal BM biopsy samples
`were also processed for ISEL technique to determine the incidence
`of apoptotic cell death.
`
`ISEL of Fragmented DNA
`Two-micrometersections from the previously mentioned BM bi-
`opsy samples were obtained. The sections were rehydrated in dis-
`tilled water for 10 minutes and then incubated with freshly diluted
`3% hydrogen peroxide (H,O,) for 30 minutes. Specimens were thor-
`oughly rinsed in 0.15 mol/L phosphate buffer solution (PBS) (0.15
`mol/L sodium chloride [NaCl] in 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer, pH
`7.5). Subsequently they were incubated with sodium chloride, so-
`dium citrate solution (SSC) (0.3 mol/L NaCl and 30 mmol/L Na-
`citrate, pH 7.0) at 80°C for 20 minutesfollowed by thorough washing
`with 0.15 mol/L PBS. The sections were next treated with pronase
`(1.0 mg/mL in 0.15 mol/L PBS, Calbiochem, LaJolla, CA) at room
`temperature for 30 minutes. After this they were rinsedfirst in 0.15
`mol/L PBS and then in buffer A, pH 7.5 (50 mmoV/L TRIS HCl, 5
`mmol/L MgCh, 10 mmoV/L f-mercaptoethanol and 0.005% bovine
`serum albumin [BSA], fraction V; Sigma Chemical Co, St Louis,
`MO). Sections were then incubated with ISEL solution prepared in
`buffer A (0.01 mmol/L deoxyadenosine triphosphate, deoxyguano-
`sine triphosphate, deoxycytidine tiphosphate) (Promega, Madison,
`WI), 0.001 mmol/L biotin-11 deoxyuridine triphosphate (Sigma),
`and 20 U/mL Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I (Promega)at 18°C
`for 2 hours, followed by washing with buffer A and later with 0.5
`mol/L, PBS (0.5 mol/L NaC]in 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer, pH 7.5).
`The specimens were then incubated with avidin-biotin-horseradish
`peroxidase conjugate (Vectastain Elite ABC Kit-Vector, Burl-
`ingame, CA; diluted 1:25 in 0.5 mol/L PBS containing 1% BSA
`and 0.5% Tween 20). Finally, samples were stained using 0.04%
`3,3’-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride diluted in 0.05 mol/L
`TRIS buffer, pH 7.5, with 0.015% of 30% H,O, for 10 minutes and
`rinsed well with distilled water. The specimens were then mounted
`with Fluoromount G (Biotechnology Associate Inc, Birmingham,
`Interpretation of BM Biopsy Specimen Slide
`AL). Slides were left to dry overnight before estimation of PCD.
`All slides were examined underalight microscope attached to a
`television screen. Atleast three different investigators were involved
`in the interpretation of each slide (A.R. being one of them every
`time).
`
`Simultaneous Assessmentof Cell Birth
`(Proliferation) and Cell Death (Apoptosis) From the
`Same Biopsy Sample Section Using Double-Labeling
`by ISEL and Anti-IUdr/BrdU MoAb
`For the double-labeling technique designed to simultaneously de-
`tect S-phase cells and PCD, sections were first processed for ISEL
`as described above, and then rinsed thoroughly in 0.5 mol/L TBS
`(0.5 mol/L NaCl in 0.05 mol/L TRIS buffer, pH7.5). Subsequently
`the sections were treated with 4 N HCI for 15 minutes, and the anti-
`TUdR/BrdU MoAb 3D9 (20-22) diluted 1:200 in 0.5 mol/L TBS
`containing 0.25% Tween 20 for 60 minutes at room temperature,
`rabbit antimouse IgG (Dako, Carpenteria, CA) diluted 1:20 in 0.5
`mol/L TBS for 30 minutes and with mouse alkaline phosphatase—
`antialkaline phosphatase antibody (Dako, diluted 1:40 in 0.5 mol/L
`TBS) for 30 minutes. The sections were rinsed thoroughly with 0.5
`
`Proliferation Studies
`Immunohistochemical detection of IUdR- and/or BrdU-labeled S-
`phase cells was accomplished using either the anti-[UdR/BrdU
`MoAb 3D9orthe anti-BrdU MoAbBr-3. The nuclei of cells engaged
`in DNA synthesis were stained dark-brown in single-label slides.
`The labeling index (LI) was obtained by counting only the labeled
`myeloid cells as described before.?*?* Frequently erythroid islands
`as well as occasional megakaryocytes were also in S-phase and
`these were easily recognizable because of their unique morphologic
`appearance. These labeled erythroid and megakaryocytic cells and
`their unlabeled counterparts were excluded from the LI calculations.
`At least 2,000 cells from five different fields were counted.
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1018 PAGE 2
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1018 PAGE 2
`
`

`

`270
`
`PCD Studies by ISEL
`Coverslips processed for ISEL were mounted onto glass slides
`and examined on the television screen by a group of observers (AR
`was always present). The slides werefirst scanned under low power.
`ISEL* cells showed clear, punctate brownstaining over their nuclei,
`often being most marked in the perinuclear area, Areas of apoptosis
`and PCD wereidentified if these were present in compartmentalized
`pockets. The following scoring system was used to approximately
`quantitate the incidence of PCD: absent. only an occasional ISEL*
`cell, definitely constituting +15% ofall cells; low, up to one third
`of the biopsy sample containing ISEL™ cells; intermediate, between
`one third and two thirds of the biopsy sample containing ISEL~
`cells; high, =75% ISEL*cells.
`
`Simultaneous Proliferation and PCD Studies
`In these double-labeled slides, the nuclei of S-phase cells were
`stained blue, the nuclei of ISEL* cells were stained brown and those
`S-phase cells that were also ISEL* showed the presence of both
`brown and blue staining.
`
`Detection of DNA Laddering
`Detection of DNA laddering was performed on BM aspcells of
`six MDS and three AMLpatients as well as two BM asp samples
`that were completely normal (obtained from BM transplant donors).
`After density separation on Ficoll-Hypaque,
`1
`[0° cells/mL were
`incubated for 4 hours at 37°C in 5% CO, atmosphere and used
`for DNA extraction. Cells without the 4-hour incubation were also
`similarly used for DNA extraction. The reason for incubating cells
`over virious time points before extracting DNA wasas follows: Our
`hypothesis based on the ISEL data in BM biopsy samples wasthat
`Most of the ceils appeared to be in earlier stages of PCD with only
`low amounts of DNA damagethat may not be sufficient to produce
`laddering in gels. However, leaving the cells in complete medium
`over specified time points may be enough time for the cells to
`complete the process of upoptosis with generation of low molecular-
`weight DNAthat would produce the typical DNA laddering. Thus,
`although initial experiments used a variety of time points (0, 1, 2,
`3, and 4 hours) for in vitro incubation of cells in complete medium
`before DNA extraction, later experiments have used only the 0- and
`4-hour time points because they uppear to be the two most informa-
`tive intervals.
`Briefly, the cells were washed in 0.1 mol/L PBS, pH 7.5 (0.1 mol/
`L NaClin 0.1 mol/L PBS) to removetraces of medium, lysed with
`guanidine isothiocyanate (GITC) at room temperature and layered
`on 5.7 mol/L cesiumchloride (CsCl) gradient. Afler overnight cen-
`trifugation at 32,000 rpm, the DNA fraction al the interface of CsCl
`and GITC was aspirated and pooled together with the RNAfraction
`trom the bottom of CsCl gradient tube. Subsequently, this prepara-
`tion wastreated with chilled 100% and 80% ethanol, incubated with
`Proteinase K (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) and re-
`peatedly treated with phenol:chloroform:isoamy! alcohol mixture
`(25:24:1, Sigma) to remove proteins. DNA wasthen precipitated by
`adding Na-acetate (3 mol/L, pH 6.0) and double volume of chilled
`100%. ethanol for 1 hour at —20°C. This DNA fraction was then
`treated with RNase conceniration | zg/mL (final concentration 20
`pe/mL) and subjected to reextraction using phenol:chloroform:iso-
`umyl alcohol mixture followed by treatment with Na-acetae and
`chilled 100% ethano! as described earlier. Finally, the total DNA
`content in each sample was cstimated by optical density at 260 nm
`and 5 pg DNA was loaded in 1.5% agarose gel containing ethidium
`bromide. After electrophoresis, the gel was photographed underul-
`traviolet (UV)light,
`
`RAZA ET AL
`
`RESULTS
`
`Fifty patients wilh a confirmed diagnosis of MDSare the
`subject of this report. The French-American-British (FAB)
`classification was used to identify the various subtypes of
`MDSpatients.** There were 19 cases ofrefractory anemia
`(RA), 6 cases of refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts
`(RARS),
`[7 cases of refractory anemia with excess blasts
`(RAEB), 7 cases of RAEB in transformation (RAEB-t) and
`1 case of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMMOL). BM
`cellularity was also available in all 50 cases. Table | de-
`scribes the details of FAB type, apoptosis, cell cycle kinetics,
`biopsy sample cellularity and complete blood counts in ull
`50 patients.
`
`Results of Control Experiments
`
`A comparison of ISEL technique with DNA laddering
`detected by gel electrophoresis was performed on HL-60
`cells treated with etoposide, Whereas untreated HL-60 cells
`did not show any low molecular-weight DNA,
`the cells
`treated with etoposide showed a characteristic DNA ladder
`pattern (Fig 1A). Results obtained by ISEL correlated very
`well with these data. The percentage of apoptotic (ISEL*)
`cells in the control, untreated HL-60 cells was 1.59%,
`whereasthis percentage in etoposide-treated HL-60 cells in-
`creased to 13.9% (Fig 1, B and C). The DNA laddering and
`ISEL methods were similarly compared in at least three more
`sets of experiments and results obtained repeatedly showed
`that an accurate detection of apoptotic cells can be accom-
`plished using etther. Once satisfied that ISEL is a highly
`accurate method of detecting PCD, we proceeded to use
`plastic embedded BM biopsy samples obtained from MDS
`patients for precise quantitation of apoptotic cel] death.
`Incidence of spontaneous apoptosis was quantitatively
`scored in 20 BM biopsy samples obtained from AML pa-
`tients studied at the time of diagnosis and before receiving
`any remission induction chemotherapy. Noneof these biopsy
`samples showed greater than 10% to 15% of the total cells
`positive for ISEL staining. The leukemic blasts were univer-
`sally negative. The few ISEL* cells were usually present in
`small clusters and appeared morphologically to represent
`areas of residual normal hematopoiesis. Furthermore, dou-
`bie-labeling showed that none of the S-phase cells were
`ISEL".
`PCD wasalso studied in two normal BM biopsy samples
`obtained from NHL patients. Both the patients showed geo-
`graphically well-defined areas of apoptotic cell death scat-
`tered throughout the sumples. Within these ‘‘geographically
`restricted islands of death,’’ all three lineages of cells were
`ISEL*, as were occasional stromal cells. On the whole, such
`areas accounted for approximately one third of the BM bi-
`opsy sample area, but it was never as extensive as in MDS
`patients. Finally. S-phase cells were never double-Jabeled
`for ISEL in these samples.
`
`Proliferation Studies
`
`Statistical Analysis
`Mann Whitney tcsts were uscd for two sample comparisons of
`continuous vaniubles, Contingency tables, with chi squarestatistics
`or Fisher's exact test, were used for analyzing.
`
`Sequential labeling of S-phase cells was performed in vivo
`using infusions of IUdR and/or BrdU. Labeling indices (LI)
`trom BM biopsy samples were available in 46 patients. The
`median LI was 28.6% with a range of 13% to 49.1%. Dura-
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1018 PAGE 3
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1018 PAGE 3
`
`

`

`APOPTOSIS IN BM BIOPSY SAMPLES
`
`271
`
`Table 1. Cell Cycle Kinetics, PCD, and Clinica! Characteristics of Patients With MOS
`Te
`Cellularity
`WBC Count
`Hb Count
`Platelets Count
`
`3 No.
`Patient GMA No,
`FAB
`ISEL
`Li%
`Ts (hs}
`{hs}
`(%)
`(x 10°/L)
`(g/dL)
`(x10)
`1
`207/88
`RA
`High
`39.6
`15.6
`38
`30
`45
`11.6
`92
`2
`131/90
`RAEB-t
`High
`47
`19
`40
`15
`17
`12.3
`182
`3
`130/89
`RA
`High
`26
`NA
`NA
`90
`9.4
`10.6
`433
`4
`250/87
`RA
`High
`25.1
`9.7
`38.6
`50
`2.7
`10.1
`68
`5
`14/87
`RAEB
`High
`21.3
`15.2
`17.3
`95
`12.8
`7.4
`44
`6
`3/87
`RA
`High
`15
`7.4
`47
`10
`3.9
`10.1
`29
`7
`268/90
`RARS
`High
`29.3
`65.8
`224.6
`90
`38.1
`8.2
`360
`8
`215/90
`RARS
`High
`13
`8.06
`62
`90
`13
`9.6
`409
`9
`21/91
`RARS
`High
`37
`6.72
`18.16
`40
`4.5
`11.8
`71
`10
`43/93
`RAEB
`High
`24
`NA
`NA
`20
`0.7
`6.1
`24
`11
`11/93
`RAEB
`High
`26
`NA
`NA
`60
`37
`9.3
`127
`12
`5/93
`RAEB
`High
`18
`NA
`NA
`20
`1.6
`9.2
`225
`13
`63/93
`RA
`High
`25
`NA
`NA
`70
`2.9
`10.1
`256
`14
`169/90
`RAEB-t
`High
`32
`NA
`NA
`70
`2.5
`9.3
`61
`16
`616/87
`RAEB-t
`High
`31
`22
`71
`60
`NA
`NA
`NA
`16
`390/87
`RAEB
`High
`33.6
`14,7
`43.7
`80
`14.6
`12
`219
`17
`19/93
`RAEB-t
`High
`18
`NA
`NA
`70
`10.1
`8.4
`15
`18
`21/93
`RAEB
`High
`18
`NA
`NA
`40
`1.5
`9.1
`45
`19
`20/91
`RARS
`High
`30.6
`11.82
`38
`40
`75
`8.4
`417
`20
`86/94
`RA
`High
`24
`NA
`NA
`80
`3.1
`10.6
`63
`21
`98/94
`RAEB
`High
`28.7
`4.6
`16.1
`70
`47
`79
`224
`22
`150/94
`RA
`High
`31.5
`27.9
`88.6
`80
`2.5
`11.1
`162
`23
`64/94
`RAEB-t
`High
`28.5
`5.6
`19.8
`40
`1.3
`8
`25
`24
`130/94
`RAEB
`High
`24.5
`24.9
`101.8
`40
`25,7
`9.3
`43
`25
`281/94
`RAEB
`High
`18.7
`5
`27
`70
`9.8
`9.4
`99
`26
`88/94
`RAEB
`High
`23.9
`3.6
`15
`90
`1.6
`8.3
`56
`27
`382/88
`RA
`Intermediate
`46.6
`NA
`NA
`35
`NA
`NA
`NA
`28
`128/90
`RARS
`Intermediate
`49.1
`6.8
`13.8
`90
`1.4
`8.3
`43
`29
`34/89
`RA
`Intermediate
`39
`24
`61.5
`65
`15.2
`9.2
`729
`30
`100/89
`RAEB-t
`Intermediate
`39,3
`17.5
`44.5
`50
`49
`9.2
`32
`31
`182/80
`RARS
`Intermediate
`32.3
`16.2
`50.15
`70
`3.4
`8
`11
`32
`609/87
`RAEB-t
`Intermediate
`31
`22
`71
`50
`4
`8.8
`53
`33
`136/90
`RAEB
`Intermediate
`29
`32.3
`111.3
`60
`6.7
`8.2
`196
`34
`292/94
`RAEB
`Intermediate
`33.8
`6.9
`20.4
`80
`3.2
`9.1
`93
`36
`390/87
`RA
`Low
`33.1
`13.8
`41.7
`55
`1
`8.7
`212
`36
`74/87
`RA
`Low
`25.3
`14.6
`57.5
`50
`3.1
`10.5
`70
`37
`25/93
`RA
`Low
`41
`NA
`NA
`70
`8.7
`9.3
`52
`38
`46/93
`RA
`Low
`16
`NA
`NA
`30
`17
`74
`79
`a9
`103/93
`RAEB
`Low
`38
`NA
`NA
`70
`0.8
`8.8
`28
`40
`26/91
`RA
`Low
`35
`5.8
`16.5
`80
`3.4
`7.8
`104
`41
`112/94
`RA
`Low
`NA
`5.3
`NA
`60
`3.7
`13.2
`126
`42
`23/94
`CMMOL
`Low
`19.1
`NA
`NA
`60
`11.8
`6.5
`173
`43
`104/94
`RA
`Low
`NA
`NA
`NA
`30
`6.3
`9.9
`30
`44
`48/94
`RAEB
`Low
`NA
`NA
`NA
`60
`6.3
`12.8
`915
`45
`245/94
`RA
`Low
`23.9
`3
`12.6
`30
`2.5
`6.7
`52
`46
`51/93
`RAEB
`Negative
`14
`NA
`NA
`50
`3.1
`12,9
`250
`47
`68/87
`RAEB
`Negative
`24
`NA
`NA
`70
`2.5
`9.2
`1,551
`48
`282/94
`RAEB
`Negative
`24.9
`5.8
`23.1
`80
`7.4
`10
`90
`49
`275/94
`RA
`Negative
`44.5
`41
`9.1
`10
`1.1
`8.1
`29
`
`88/93 RA NA NA NA NA 1 4 10.950 35
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Abbreviations: GMA, glycol methacrylate biopsy; WBC, white blood cell; Hb, hernoglobin; NA, not available.
`
`tion of S-phase (Ts) was available in 30 patients with a
`median of 12.8 hours and a range of 3.0 to 65.8 hours. Total
`cell cycle time (Tc) was available in 29 with a median of
`40.0 hours (range, 9.1 to 224.6 hours). These data are also
`provided in Table 1 for individual patients.
`
`Apoptosis Studies
`
`In situ end labeling of fragmented DNA was performed
`on the plastic embedded biopsy samples of all 50 patients.
`
`A distinct brown staining in a variety of patterns over the
`nucleus identifies a cell as being engaged in DNAcleavage.
`Amongthe 50 cases being reported, one biopsy sample was
`excluded because of poor quality of the sample whereas four
`cases showed ‘‘absent’’ apoptosis or only occasional ISEL*
`cells and were considered as ISEL~ (Table 1). Of the re-
`maining 45 cases, 26 had high, 8 had intermediate and 10
`had low ISEL-positivity.
`Interestingly, all three lineages of hematopoietic cells in-
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1018 PAGE4
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1018 PAGE 4
`
`

`

`aeSaeed
`el
`roel
`one
`Ce
`it
`
`(A) Agarose gel electrophoresis of DNA ex-
`Fig 1.
`tracted from HL-60 calls incubated with etoposide at
`varying concentrations. Lane 1, no etoposide; lane
`Z, treated with etoposide at 17.5 ;mol/L for 4 hours,
`lane 3, treated with etoposide at 36 yzmol/L for 4
`hours; lane 4, DNA molecular-weight marker, 100-bp
`DNAladder(GIBCO Life Technologies, GrandIsland,
`NY). Note the appearance of laddering in lane 3. {B)
`In situ end labeling on contro! HL-60 cells without
`etoposide treatment show no positive staining. (C)
`ISEL of etoposide-treaated HL-60 calls show distinct
`
`llml RAZA ET AL
`ISEL staining over clearly karyorrhectic cells.
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1018 PAGE 5
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1018 PAGE 5
`
`

`

`APOPTOSIS IN BM BIOPSY SAMPLES
`
`cluding the myeloid. erythroid and megakaryocytic cells
`were found to be undergoing apoptosis. Figure 2 shows some
`of these ISEL* cells. Furthermore, almost
`in every case,
`stromal cells were also found to be apoptotic including endo-
`thelial cells, fat cells, and fibroblasts. In Figure 2, ISEL” as
`well as negative fibroblasts and endothelial cells can be seen.
`Figure 3 shows the typical crescent-shaped chromatin con-
`densation in an AML patient's leukemic blast as stained by
`the ISEL technique.
`
`Simultaneous Labeling for Proliferation and
`Apoptosis
`
`Double labeling using ISEL and anti-[UdR/BrdU antibody
`techniques wis performed on 15 MDS patients. In every case,
`S-phasecells were frequently found to be undergoing apoptosis
`as well. Figure 4 clearly shows a megakaryocyte thatis synthe-
`sizing DNA (blue staining) and is also undergoing apoptosis
`(brownstaining) or is in a state of ‘‘Antonymy.’” Because all
`of the first 15 consecutive patients examined by this double-
`libeling technique showed the same concurrent cell-birth/cell-
`death pattern, the remaining biopsy samples were not double-
`labeled. In a numberofpatients, macrophagesfilled with ISEL*
`debris of apoptotic cells were recognizable (Fig 5).
`
`Results of DNA Laddering in MDS, AMLs, and
`Normal Controls
`
`DNA wasextracted from BM asps of six MDS patients,
`(Table L, patients no. 22, 24, 25, 34, 48, and 49), three AML
`patients and two normal individuals who were BM transplant
`donors. Figure 6 shows the resulis in these 11 individuals.
`Lane | shows the DNA molecular marker, (100-bp DNA
`ladder). The next two Janes show the results in 2 normal
`donors whose BM asps were incubated for 4 hours in com-
`plete medium before extraction of DNA. No evidence of
`DNAladdering can be seenin cither ofthe norma] samples.
`Similarly, the next four lanes show three AMLpaticnts and
`none of them show any DNA laddering cither. On the other
`hand, lanes 8 through 18 represent 0- and 4-hour samples
`ofstx MDSpatients. The first four of these (Table |, patients
`no, 22, 24, 25, and 34) show laddering in the 4-hour sumples,
`but not in the 0-hourlanes. All 4 four ofthese individuals
`had evidence of ISELpositivily in their biopsy samples. The
`last two MDS patients (Table 1, patients no. 48 and 49) had
`no ISELstaining in their biopsy samples and show no DNA
`laddering even after 4 hours of incubation in complete me-
`dium (lanes I$ through 18). Thus, the data obtained by gel
`clectrophoresis confirmed the results obtained by ISEL stain-
`ing in all cases examined,
`
`273
`
`
`
`Flg 6. Agarose gel electrophorasis of DNA extracted from Ficoll-
`separated BM asp mononuclearcells (BMAMNC)}before(t,) and after
`(t,) incubation in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FBS,for 4 hours
`at 37°C, Ethidium bromide staining photographedin ultravioletlight.
`Lane 1, DNA molecular-weight markers, 100-bp DNA ladder (GIBCO
`BRL}; lanes 2 and 3, t, DNA from BMAMNCof normal healthy donors;
`lane 4, t,; and lanes 5 through7, t, DNA from BMAMNC ofthree AML
`patients; lanes 8 through 11, t, and t DNA from BMAMNC of MDS
`patients, The normal donors as well as AML patients did not show
`any evidence of low molecular-weight DNAat 0 or 4 hours. Interest-
`ingly, 4 of 6 MDS patients although showed intact DNA at 0 hours
`claarly demonstrated a characteristic laddering at 4 hours, However,
`the remaining 2 MDS patients did not show laddering even at 4
`hours. The prepensity of BMAMNC te underge apoptosis in vitro
`detected by agarose gel electrophoresis and the degree of spontane-
`ous apoptosis measured in BM biopsy samples by ISEL carrelated
`very well,
`
`Other Clinical and Biologic Characteristics Versus
`Proliferation and Apoptosis
`The rates of cell birth and cell death were compared in
`the various FAB categories. Apoptosis was maximum in
`RAEB-t patients, all 7 having greater than 50% ISEL* cells,
`whereas 9 RA patients had high and 9 had low ISEL-posi-
`tivity (P = .057) with two patients having intermediate posi-
`tivity. Most importantly, even though there was so much
`cel] death in RAEB-t patients, clusters of ISEL~ myeloblasts
`(ALIPs) were clearly recognizable. On the other hand, L.1
`was below median for 5 of 7 RAEB-t patients, whereas half
`the RA patients had above and half had below median LI.
`ISEL results were also corelated with other parameters such
`as LI (P = .314), Ts (P = .234), Te (P = .275), WBC (P
`= .160), Hb (P = .801), platelets (P = .273), and biopsy
`sample cellularity (P = .648). No statistically significant
`relationships were identified.
`DISCUSSION
`
`A recently described technique for detecting PCD that
`uses ISEL of fragmented DNA**” has been used in the
`
` +
`
`Fig 2. Plastic embedded BM biopsy from an MDSpatient showing large numbers of apoptoticcells Jabeled brown by JSEL. Note the many
`negative cells in the field. Stromal cells such as fibroblasts and endothelial cells are also ISEL”.
`Fig 3. Chromatin condensationin the form of a typical crescent usually seen in earlier stages of programmedcell death stained by ISELin
`the BM biopsy sample of a patient with acute myeloid leukemia.
`Fig 4. Double labeling to simultaneously detect calls engaged in DNA synthesis (anti-1\UdR/BrdU antibody) and apoptosis (ISEL), Blue marks
`S-phase cells whereas brown marks apoptosis. Note the large megakaryocyte that is simultaneously engaged in both processes (blue and
`brown staining). This state has been termed ’’Antonymy.”
`Fig 5. A macrophagethat contains ISEL* debris of apoptotic cells in the BM biopsy sample of an RAEB-t patient.
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1018 PAGE 6
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABS., INC. EX. 1018 PAGE 6
`
`

`

`274
`
`RAZA ET AL
`
`present study to determine the incidence of intramedullary
`cell death in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Four
`unique observations have been made in the present study.
`First, that myelodysplastic syndromes are highly prolifera-
`tive disorders with almost one third of the marrow cells
`engaged in DNA synthesis (median LI for myeloid cells,
`29%; median cell cycle time, 44 hours). Second, that unfortu-
`nately this high rate of cell birth is cancelled by an cqually
`high rate of cell-death resulting in a functionally aplastic
`BM,an observation that constitutes the most likely basis for
`the apparent paradox of pancytopenia despite hypercellular
`marrows encountered in the majority of these patients. This
`high rate of apoptosis affected not only all three lineages of
`the hematopoietic cells, but also involved cells of stromal
`origin (fat cells, endothelial cells, fibroblasts). Third,
`that
`many cells are simultaneously engaged in DNA synthesis
`and apoptosis. Fourth, that the DNAextracted immediately
`upon density separation of BM asps showed noladdering in
`agarose gels, whereas DNAextracted after a 4-hour incuba-
`tion of density-separated cells in complete medium showed
`the characteristic laddering in 4 of 4 MDS patients with
`250% ISEL* cells in the matched biopsy samples, but none
`in the 2 of 2 MDSpatients with no ISEL staining in their
`biopsy samples.
`While a high rate of apoptosis has previously been hypoth-
`esized to be a possible explanation for the ineffective hema-
`topoiesis observed in these disorders on the basis of finding
`increased apoptotic nuclei in trephine sections,” the present
`report is the first documented proof that large numbers of
`marrow cells are engaged inearlier stages of PCD. Several
`features of this study are unexpected. To begin with,
`the
`extent of apoptosis encountered was previously unsuspected.
`In 26 of 50 patients examined, there was evidence that =75%
`of all hematopoietic cells were apoptotic.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket