throbber
Downloaded from
`
`jpet.aspetjournals.org
`
` at ASPET Journals on January 19, 2016
`
`0022-3565/87/2412-0401$OO.OO/0
`Jouamt(cid:1)i.
`or
`THE
`PHAassAcoL0GY
`CopyrightO
`1987 by The American
`
`AND
`Society
`
`EXPERIMENTAL
`for Pharmacology
`
`$02.OO/O
`THERAPEUTICS
`and Experimental
`
`Therapeutics
`
`Vol.
`Printed
`
`241, No.
`in U.S.A.
`
`2
`
`Pharmacokinetic
`Antiprogesterone
`
`of the Antiglucocorticoid
`Properties
`Steroid RU 486 in Man1
`
`and
`
`SHINICHI
`GEORGE
`
`LYNNETTE
`KAWAI,2
`P. CHROUSOS
`
`K. NIEMAN,
`
`DAVID
`
`0. BRANDON,
`
`ROBERT
`
`UDELSMAN,
`
`D. LYNN
`
`LORIAUX
`
`and
`
`Developmental
`
`Accepted
`
`for publication
`
`Endocrinology
`January
`
`National
`Branch,
`21 , 1987
`
`Institute
`
`of Child Health and Human Development,
`
`National
`
`Institutes
`
`of Health,
`
`Bethesda,
`
`Maryland
`
`-pro-
`
`ABSTRACT
`1 (cid:1)-[4-dimethyIamino
`RU 486
`7a-[1
`phenylj-1
`(1 7fl-hydroxy-1
`pynyljestra-4,9-dien-3-one)
`a clinically
`useful
`glucocorticoid
`iS
`The authors
`and progesterone
`studied
`the
`pharma-
`antagonist.
`of this drug
`in normal
`volunteers
`and
`patisnts
`cokinetic
`pro(cid:1)es
`a rat progesterone
`syndrome
`using
`radioreceptor
`Cushing’s
`with
`to those
`Obtained
`with
`gave
`This
`similar
`assay.
`assay
`values
`rat
`a
`assay.
`After
`single
`oral
`dose
`glucocorticoid
`radioreceptor
`1 1) to normal
`of 25 mg/kg
`1 1) or 1 0 mg/kg
`volunteers,
`(n =
`(n =
`plasma
`of progesterone
`COnCentratiOnS
`receptor-reactive
`mate-
`maximal
`hal
`± 288
`(mean
`and
`± S.D.)
`517
`reached
`levels
`of 754
`183
`1Lg/dI. This
`occurred
`at
`3.1±
`1.9
`and
`2.5


`1.0
`h,
`respectively.
`The
`respective
`apparent
`plasma
`half-lives
`were
`
`a
`
`7.0
`
`7.7
`
`20.6
`19.2
`Cushing’s
`with
`patients
`and
`Four
`h.


`relatively
`had
`mg/kg/day)
`(1 0-20
`chronically
`syndrome
`treated
`of
`from 506
`ranging
`reactivity
`receptor
`levels
`plasma
`constant
`circulating
`of
`Chromatographic
`(cid:1)g/dI.
`to
`I 1 84
`characterization
`corresponded
`the active
`fraction
`that
`showed
`reactivity
`receptor
`to RU 486
`N-mono-
`and
`N-didemethylated
`hydrophilic
`and
`the
`delty
`dose
`0.5% of
`in
`was
`excreted
`than
`metabolites.
`Less
`of
`these
`the
`The
`patients
`receptor
`reactivity.
`unne
`two
`as
`competed
`extensively
`drug
`bound
`to
`circulating
`albumin,
`which
`of
`with
`the
`glucocorticoid
`receptor
`intact
`human
`mononuclear
`for
`in a concentration-dependent
`manner.
`[3HJRU 486
`leukocytes
`
`its
`
`of
`
`(Phi-
`and
`
`antagonist
`and progesterone
`glucocorticoid
`A synthetic
`libert
`1981;
`1983; Moguilewsky
`Schreiber
`et
`at.,
`et
`at.,
`RU 486
`(17(cid:1)-hydroxy-11(cid:1)9-[4-dimethylamino
`Philibert,
`1984),
`cm-
`phenyl]-17a-[1-propynyl]estra-4,9-dien-3-one),
`has major
`ical
`in the
`treatment
`of hypercortisolism
`(Nieman
`a!.,
`uses
`et
`1982;
`and
`in the
`regulation
`of
`fertility
`(Herrman
`a!.,
`et
`1985a)
`et a!., 1985b).
`Kovacs
`et a!., 1985; Nieman
`et a!.,
`1984;
`Schaison
`suggested
`a long
`plasma
`half-
`Preliminary
`limited
`studies
`have
`this
`for
`1985;
`Shoupe
`1985).
`a!.,
`a!.,
`life
`drug
`et
`et
`(Deraedt
`studies
`were
`in a small
`number
`of
`subjects
`These
`performed
`used
`either
`and
`tracer
`methods
`or measurement
`of
`im-
`drug
`munoreactivity.
`pharmacoki-
`the
`examine
`to
`was
`study
`this
`of
`The
`purpose
`and
`glucocorti-
`progesterone
`using
`of RU 486
`netic
`properties
`of receptor-reactive
`RU
`plasma
`concentrations
`coid RRAs.
`The
`in normal
`subjects
`and
`its metabolites
`were
`determined
`486
`in four
`patients
`with
`single
`oral
`doses
`the
`and
`after
`drug
`with
`RU 486.
`The
`Cushing’s
`syndrome
`chronically
`in
`plasma
`proteins
`and
`the
`with
`interactions
`vitro
`glucocorticoid
`human
`leukocytes
`were
`also
`studied.
`
`of
`treated
`of RU
`receptor
`of
`
`486
`intact
`
`1 Presented
`
`in part
`
`at
`
`the American
`
`Federation
`
`for Clinical
`
`Research
`
`National
`
`Washington,
`Meeting,
`S Supported
`in
`Therapeutics
`and
`
`part
`the
`
`1986.
`D.C.,
`the
`Japanese
`by
`Rouseel-UCLAF
`
`Society
`Institute.
`
`of Clinical
`
`Pharmacology
`
`and
`
`Methods
`
`from the U.S. Na-
`study was
`for the
`obtained
`Subjects.
`Approval
`and Biologics
`the Human
`Investigation
`for Drugs
`and
`Bureau
`tional
`for the National
`Institutes
`of Health.
`The nature
`and
`aims
`Committee
`of
`the
`study were
`the
`subjects who gave
`their
`consent.
`explained
`to all
`The
`clinical
`at
`the Clinical
`Center
`of
`the
`were
`performed
`studies
`National
`Institutes
`of Health.
`ages 20 to 49 years
`five normal women,
`men and
`Seventeen
`normal
`(table
`RU 486
`(mean
`S.D.,
`8.6),
`1). The
`drug,
`received

`30.7

`from
`Roussel-UCLAF
`formulated
`into
`50-mg
`tablets,
`was
`a
`gift
`It was
`orally
`at 8:00
`or 8:00
`administered
`(Paris,
`France).
`AM.
`P.M.
`fasting. Half
`the
`at
`least
`8 h of
`of
`25 mg/kg
`after
`volunteers
`received
`RU 486,
`half
`received
`10 mg/kg.
`Blood
`and
`were
`drawn
`from
`samples
`vein immediately
`at 0.5,
`antecubital
`1, 1.5,
`2, 2.5,
`3, 4, 5, 6,
`before
`and
`24 h after
`plasma
`samples were
`16 and
`7, 8,
`administration.
`Separated
`kept
`at
`-70#{176}Cuntil
`assay.
`frozen
`with RU
`chronically
`treated
`syndrome
`Cushing’s
`Four
`patients
`with
`RU 486 measured
`of receptor-reactive
`plasma
`concentrations
`had
`486
`every
`6 h from 8:00
`on several
`occasions.
`They
`received RU 486 tablets
`of these
`patients
`The
`age,
`sex, diagnosis
`RU 486 doses
`and
`daily
`A.M.
`with
`serum
`given
`in table
`2. Patient
`3 had chronic
`are
`failure
`renal
`excretion
`of RU 486
`of 6 mg/dl.
`Twenty-four-hour
`urinary
`creatinine
`2 and
`3 and
`of
`the drug
`in patients
`c(cid:1)rebrospinal
`concentration
`fluid
`was
`Sampling
`4 were
`also mdasured
`reactivity.
`in patient
`as
`receptor
`at
`least
`2 weeks
`treatment
`with RU 486.
`of
`the onset
`performed
`after
`Steroids.
`[‘H)R5020
`([17a-methyl-’HJ17,21-dimethyl-19-nor-
`pregna-4,9-diene-3,
`20-dione;
`[‘H]promegestone;
`87.0
`Ci/mmol),
`
`unla-
`
`ABBREVIATIONS:
`
`RRA,
`
`radioreceptor
`
`assay;
`
`PBS,
`
`phosphate-buffered
`
`saline.
`
`401
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`jpet.aspetjournals.org
`
` at ASPET Journals on January 19, 2016
`
`402
`
`Kawal
`
`et al
`
`Vol.241
`
`TABLE 1
`Pharmacokinetic
`
`properties
`
`of RU 486 after
`
`single
`
`oral
`
`administration
`
`In normal
`
`volunteers
`
`Case
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`
`Mean
`
`± S.D.
`
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`± S.D.
`
`Mean
`
`(cid:1)se48(cid:1)
`
`mg/kg
`25
`25
`25
`25
`25
`25
`25
`25
`25
`25
`25
`
`10
`10
`10
`10
`10
`10
`10
`10
`10
`10
`10
`
`Actniristration
`
`A.M.
`
`P.M.
`
`P.M.
`
`P.M.
`AM.
`P.M.
`A.M.
`
`P.M.
`AM.
`A.M.
`A.M.
`
`AM.
`AM.
`A.M.
`A.M.
`
`P.M.
`
`P.M.
`
`P.M.
`
`P.M.
`
`P.M.
`A.M.
`AM.
`
`A9e
`
`yr
`26
`27
`34
`38
`23
`20
`36
`45
`25
`30
`28
`± 7.4
`20
`25
`29
`27
`39
`22
`49
`43
`41
`27
`22
`± 9.9
`
`30.2
`
`31.3
`
`a Maxvnum
`S (cid:1)
`
`plasma
`concentration
`
`of receptor-reactive
`concentration
`of receptor-reactive
`RU 486
`
`RU 486.
`24 h after
`
`adminiStratiOn.
`
`Sex
`
`Appaint T,(cid:1)
`
`Pe(cid:1)
`
`Tine
`
`M
`M
`M
`F
`F
`M
`M
`F
`M
`M
`M
`
`F
`M
`M
`M
`M
`M
`M
`M
`F
`M
`M
`
`19.2
`
`20.6
`
`h
`9.5
`22.6
`23.6
`33.7
`25.8
`13.8
`20.0
`13.5
`13.4
`20.1
`15.5
`± 7.0
`10.6
`25.7
`25.9
`32.8
`12.8
`12.5
`31.5
`21.2
`16.3
`21.6
`15.2
`± 7.7
`
`h
`3
`2.5
`2
`1.5
`4
`2
`4
`2
`8
`4
`1.5
`3.1 ± 1.9
`3
`2.5
`2
`2.5
`4
`0.5
`1.5
`2.5
`4
`2
`2.5
`2.5 ± 1.0
`
`C max
`
`(cid:1)zg/dl
`326
`877
`533
`877
`815
`846
`583
`595
`589
`1441
`815
`
`754
`
`± 288
`420
`714
`162
`249
`602
`489
`761
`536
`517
`639
`602
`517 ± 183
`
`C 24 h’
`
`308
`
`(cid:1)g/dl
`75
`376
`483
`420
`370
`244
`219
`188
`257
`539
`219
`± 140
`86
`271
`90
`146
`197
`135
`423
`203
`160
`214
`158
`189 ± 100
`
`2
`TABLE
`Concentrations
`Pt., patient; Conc.,
`
`of receptor-reactive
`concentration;
`CSF,
`
`fluids
`RU 486 in biologic
`cerebrospinal
`fluid; CA, carcinoma;
`
`with Cushing’s
`from patients
`ACTh,
`adrenocorticotropin.
`
`syndrome
`
`treated
`
`chronically
`
`with RU 486
`
`Pt
`
`Age Sex
`
`D(cid:1)gno(cid:1)s
`
`Doseof RU486
`
`PlasmaConc.
`
`yr
`25 M
`36 M
`45 F
`40 F
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`#{149}Mean ± S.D.
`of samples.
`S Number
`
`ACTH
`ectopic
`ectopic ACTH
`adrenal CA,
`renal
`ectopic
`ACTH
`
`failure
`
`mg/kg/day
`20
`15
`10
`10
`
`(cid:1)g/dl
`506 ±
`(n =
`85’
`22)b
`± 27 (n = 4)
`910
`± 152 (n = 4)
`629
`1 184 ± 259 (n = 3)
`
`gig/kg/day
`
`pg/dI
`
`49
`29
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`42
`
`[3HJ
`and
`Ci/mmol)
`40.6
`([1,2-3H]cortisol;
`[3H]cortisol
`R5020,
`beled
`35.0 Ci/mmol)
`([6,7-3H]dexamethasone;
`dexamethasone
`obtained
`were
`from New England
`Nuclear
`(Bedford, MA).
`[3HJRU 486 ([6,7-3H]RU
`RU 486, RU 42 633
`50.6 Ci/mmol),
`486;
`unlabeled
`(N-monodemeth-
`ylated RU 486)
`and RU 42 848 (N-didemethylated
`RU 486) were gifts
`from Roussel-UCLAF.
`All other
`Sigma
`were
`steroids
`purchased
`from
`Louis, MO).
`Chemical
`Co.
`(St.
`preparation.
`cytosol
`Rat
`uterus
`and
`thymus
`Ovariectomized
`and adrenalectomized
`estrogen-treated
`rats
`(140-160
`female
`Holtzman
`of
`used
`as
`a source
`Co., Madison, WI) were
`g; Holtzman
`uterine
`4th
`On the 3rd and
`thymus
`glucocorticoid
`progesterone
`and
`receptors.
`oil was
`administered
`in sesame
`surgery,
`estradiol
`(1.5
`gig)
`days
`after
`i.m. Uteri
`and
`obtained
`on
`the
`5th
`day.
`They
`were
`thymuses
`were
`in ice-cold
`homogenization
`trimmed,
`individually
`placed
`rinsed
`and
`0.5 mM dithiothreitol,
`[10 mM Tris-HC1,
`1.5 mM EDTA,
`buffer
`glycerol
`(v/v),
`pH 7.4J. After
`homogenize-
`20 mM sodium
`molybdate,
`(OMNI-MIXER
`tion with a motor-driven
`homogenizer
`17105;
`E.
`I. du
`Pont de Nemours & Co., Newton,
`CT),
`cytosol
`prepared
`fractions
`were
`et a!., 1976).
`(Rifla
`by ultracentrifugation
`as previously
`These
`described
`within
`at
`kept
`-70C.
`The
`cytosol
`were
`frozen
`fractions
`were
`used
`month.
`The protein
`concentrations
`of
`the
`and
`thymus
`uterus
`cytosol
`and 5.0 ± 0.2 mg/ml,
`were
`4.1 ± 0.1 (mean
`± S.D.)
`respectively
`fractions
`(Bradford,
`1976).
`
`3%
`
`1
`
`in
`
`the
`of
`[3H]R5020
`and
`[‘HI
`
`or
`
`assays were performed
`These
`RRAS.
`extraction
`ethanol
`after
`fraction
`and
`Uterus
`as mentioned
`below.
`cytosol
`sample,
`were used for the progesterone
`RRA.
`fraction
`cytosol
`Thymus
`RRA.
`were
`employed
`for the glucocorticoid
`dexamethasone
`added
`to denature
`Four milliliters
`to 100 (cid:1)d
`ofplasma
`ofethanol
`were
`± 2% (mean
`plasma
`proteins.
`The
`recovery
`[‘H]RU
`486 was
`102
`of

`with
`20 (cid:1)il of
`S.D.).
`Three
`to 10 (cid:1)il of ethanol
`solution
`were
`then mixed
`was
`propylene
`glycol
`in a 12 x 75-mm
`Ethanol
`evaporated
`glass
`tube.
`[‘HJR5020
`a Buckler
`vortex-evaporator,
`(cid:1)l of either
`and
`100
`using
`concentration
`in the homogenization
`buffer
`(final
`[3H]dexamethasone
`100 (cid:1)il of
`cytosol
`or thymus
`uterus
`6 nM) with
`either
`in assay
`tube,
`were added
`to the
`tube. The mixture
`was
`for 18 h at 4#{176}C.
`incubated
`The
`receptor-bound
`3H-steroid
`was
`from the
`free with
`0.5 ml
`separated
`of dextran-coated
`solution
`(0.2% dextran,
`Pharmacia
`T 70,
`charcoal
`were
`and
`samples
`2% charcoal,
`Sigma
`Norit
`A,
`in the
`buffer).
`The
`for
`then
`(4#{176}C)for 10 main at 3000
`and
`15 rain
`incubated
`centrifuged
`the
`supernatant
`was COUnted
`10 ml of counting
`fluid
`rpm.
`Half
`New England
`Nuclear).
`(Aquasol;
`the proges-
`of
`The
`RRAs were
`sensitivities
`performed
`in
`duplicate.
`2.5 x
`10’#{176}M,
`5 x
`glucocorticoid
`RRAs were
`10’#{176}and
`and
`terone
`containing
`The
`normal
`plasma
`samples
`different
`respectively.
`three
`concentrations
`of RU 486 were measured
`by these
`known
`assay
`pro-
`The
`values
`in both
`the
`cedures.
`RRAs
`were
`almost
`identical
`with
`
`(cid:1)
`

`

`1987
`
`Pharmacokinetics
`
`of RU 486
`
`in Man
`
`403
`
`in
`
`with
`
`of vans-
`coefficients
`intra-assay
`The
`and
`values.
`interassay
`expected
`9 and
`respectively.
`Plasma
`concentrations
`of
`17%,
`less
`tion were
`than
`RU 486 were undetectable
`before
`administration
`in normal
`volunteers
`and
`patients
`with
`Cushing’s
`syndrome.
`Thin-layer
`chromatography.
`ethanol,
`with
`extraction
`After
`a patient
`with
`(case
`2) and
`volunteer
`plasma
`samples
`of a normal
`on thin-layer
`chromatographed
`1) were
`Cushing’s
`syndrome
`(patient
`Separation
`Inc.,
`plate; Whatman
`Chemical
`chromatography
`(LK6DF
`NJ)
`a
`cyclohexane-ethylacetate
`Clifton,
`system
`at
`22#{176}C.
`(1:1)
`for
`were
`and
`assessed
`Scraped
`1.1-cm
`fractions
`extracted
`ethanol
`Recovery
`was
`reactivity.
`progesterone
`and
`receptor
`glucocorticoid
`The
`was used
`checked
`by addition
`of 10,000
`cpm oftracer.
`system
`same
`for examination
`or purification
`of
`RU 486, unlabeled
`RU 486
`tracer
`ethanol-extracted
`RU 486 tablets.
`The R(cid:1) values
`of RU
`and
`standard
`of
`these
`were
`identical.
`preparations
`486
`from each
`three
`The
`of
`properties
`Equilibrium
`dialysis.
`protein-binding
`plasma
`dialysis
`at 37#{176}C
`RU 486 and cortisol were
`evaluated
`by an equilibrium
`as described
`by Kley et al.
`plasma
`(obtained
`(1977)
`using
`normal
`human
`of
`and 4.5 g/dl
`from the National
`Institutes
`of Health
`Blood
`Bank)
`albumin
`(Sigma)
`solution
`PBS,
`containing
`0.9% sodium chlo-
`human
`pH 7.4. The
`0.2 nM.
`final
`ride,
`concentration
`of
`‘H-steroid
`was
`of albumin
`on the binding
`The
`cell-binding
`study.
`Intact
`effect
`[‘H]RU
`486 and [3H)dexamethasone
`to intact
`human mononuclear
`of
`was
`examined
`using
`a previously
`described
`system
`(Murak-
`leukocytes
`coat was obtained
`from the National
`ami
`1979).
`The
`et a!.,
`human
`buffy
`of Health
`Blood Bank. Mononuclear
`were
`sepa-
`Institutes
`leukocytes
`Bethesda, MD).
`rated
`lymphocyte
`separation
`using
`medium
`(Bionetics,
`PBS,
`cells were
`suspended
`in RPMI-1640
`washing
`with
`After
`media
`or without
`human
`albumin
`and adjusted
`to 1.0 x iO(cid:1) per milliliter.
`with
`They were
`then
`incubated
`with
`0.1
`to
`20
`nM [3HIRU
`486
`or
`[‘H]
`5% CO2 and 95% 02 for 18 h at 22#{176}Cin a shaking
`dexa.methasone
`under
`was determined
`by the
`addition
`of a
`incubator.
`Nonspecific
`binding
`of respective
`three wash-
`unlabeled
`steroid. After
`500-fold
`molar
`excess
`ings with
`ice-cold
`PBS,
`the
`pellets
`were
`resuspended
`in PBS
`and
`the
`The
`cell Viability
`by trypan
`blue dye
`counted.
`determined
`radioactivity
`was more
`95% in various
`conditions
`of media.
`The
`than
`equilibrium
`constant
`of RU 486 for the human mononuclear
`dissociation
`leukocyte
`was determined
`by this method
`(with no added
`glucocorticoid
`receptor
`with
`that
`of dexamethasone,
`albumin)
`compared
`to
`0.32
`nM,
`as
`whichwasl.1
`nM.
`Analyses
`of
`data
`curves
`elimination
`to the
`24-h
`sample
`of the drug.
`half-life
`Student’s
`paired
`
`be
`
`linear
`Least-squares
`of plasma RU 486 levels
`was used
`for determination
`
`regression
`(logarithm)
`of
`the
`
`for the
`analysis
`from the peak
`apparent
`plasma
`
`t
`
`test was used for comparison
`
`of RRAs.
`
`Results
`
`that
`
`thymus
`x
`10(cid:1);
`
`Downloaded from
`
`jpet.aspetjournals.org
`
` at ASPET Journals on January 19, 2016
`
`dose
`oral
`table
`3 and
`who
`subjects
`S.D.)
`7.0
`(±

`plasma
`concen-
`of 25 and
`10 mgI
`183
`and
`517

`RU
`486
`levels
`RU 486 was
`in these
`or be-
`
`of
`total
`
`reactivities
`fractions
`we recovered
`5,
`receptor
`R(cid:1)
`4). The
`0.26
`0.33,
`5,
`fractions
`the
`between
`The
`fractions.
`from a normal
`had
`receptor
`
`fraction
`dialysis
`of unla-
`(cid:1)g/&)
`bound
`human
`
`This
`94.0%.
`of unlabeled
`
`RU 486
`a single
`after
`receptor-reactive
`progesterone
`in figure
`are
`shown
`in normal
`subjects
`of
`the
`drug
`values
`in normal
`apparent
`half-life
`1. The mean
`25 and
`10 mg/kg
`of RU 486 were
`19.2
`received
`and
`20.6
`± 7.7
`h,
`respectively.
`The
`maximum
`trations
`of RU 486
`administration
`after
`oral
`kg of
`were
`754
`(mean
`the
`288
`S.D.)


`drug
`g(cid:1)g/dl,
`respectively.
`In
`both
`groups,
`plasma
`reached
`the maximum
`about
`3 h after
`ingestion.
`still measurable
`24 h after
`ingestion.
`No
`differences
`were
`observed
`between
`men
`and women
`measurements
`tween morning
`and
`evening
`administration.
`in
`RU 486
`The
`plasma
`concentrations
`of
`receptor-reactive
`2.
`in table
`patients
`with
`Cushing’s
`syndrome
`are
`shown
`four
`12 h (8:00
`Patient
`1 had RU 486 measured
`every
`30 mm over
`was
`506
`(cid:1)g/
`The mean
`plasma
`concentration
`A.M.-8:00
`P.M.).
`24-h
`The
`dl, with
`a coefficient
`of
`variation
`of
`16.8%.
`urinary
`excretion
`of RU 486
`receptor
`reactivity
`was measured
`in pa-
`tients
`2 and
`3. Less
`0.5% of
`the
`daily
`dose was
`excreted
`than
`in the
`urine.
`In patient
`4, cerebrospinal
`fluid
`concentration
`RU 486
`receptor
`reactivity
`was
`approximately
`4% of
`the
`plasma
`receptor-reactive
`RU 486
`concentration.
`of
`in
`plasma.
`Receptor
`Metabolites
`RU
`486
`486
`and
`[3H]RU
`recoveries
`in the
`chromatographed
`shown
`ofplasma
`samples
`are
`in figure
`4. Although
`the
`highest
`amount
`of
`[3HJRU
`486
`in
`fraction
`reactivity
`also
`found
`in
`fractions
`4 and
`2 (fig.
`was
`of RU 486, RU 42
`and RU 42
`848 were
`values
`633
`and
`0.14,
`which
`corresponded
`to
`chromatographic
`4 and
`2,
`respectively.
`There
`was
`no
`difference
`progesterone
`and
`glucocorticoid
`RRAs
`of
`these
`chromatographed
`pretreatment
`plasma
`samples
`subject
`a patient
`with
`Cushing’s
`syndrome
`and
`reactivities
`less
`than
`the
`blank.
`bound
`The
`Plasma-bound
`fraction
`of RU
`by equilibrium
`[3H]RU
`486
`in plasma
`as determined
`of
`concentrations
`94.3
`± 1.8% (mean
`± S.D.).
`High
`was
`cortisol
`RU 486
`(up to 3000
`(cid:1)zg/dl
`ofplasma),
`beled
`(700
`on
`percent
`or progesterone
`had
`no
`effect
`(400
`(cid:1)g/&)
`The
`[3HJRU
`486.
`bound
`fraction
`of
`[3H]RU
`486
`to
`albumin
`solution
`(4.5
`g/dl)
`was
`91.8
`± 0.7%.
`The mean
`of bound
`[3H]cortisol
`in plasma
`was
`was
`reduced
`to 64.5% by addition
`oflarge
`amounts
`cortisol
`(700
`(cid:1)g/dl).
`albumin
`to mononuclear
`binding
`on RU 486
`of
`Effect
`the
`albumin
`on
`of
`effect
`shows
`the
`5
`leukocytes.
`Figure
`binding
`486
`or
`[3H]dexamethasone
`to human
`of 20 nM [3H]RU
`Total
`and
`specific
`binding
`of
`[3H]RU
`mononuclear
`leukocytes.
`with
`increasing
`albumin
`concentra-
`486
`significantly
`decreased
`tions.
`Compared
`with
`control
`(0% albumin),
`only
`8.1% of RU
`486
`bound
`specifically
`to cells when
`the media
`contained
`4.5%
`albumin.
`In contrast,
`the
`specific
`binding
`of
`[3Hjdexametha-
`sone
`to
`intact
`cells
`was minimally
`by
`the
`albumin
`affected
`concentration.
`The
`were
`observed
`using
`the
`lower
`same
`results
`concentrations
`of 3H-steroids.
`
`486.
`
`steroids
`various
`by
`[3H]R5020
`of
`displacement
`The
`RRAS.
`concentra-
`1. The
`in figure
`progesterone
`in the
`shown
`is
`RRA
`the
`[3H]R5020
`binding
`to
`that
`inhibited
`50% of
`tions
`uterus
`x
`2.9
`10(cid:1);
`(in molar)
`RU
`486,
`progesterone
`receptor
`were
`estradiol,
`8.5
`1.1
`x
`i0(cid:1);
`10(cid:1);
`progesterone,
`and
`x
`R5020,
`7.5
`cross-reactivity
`in this
`system.
`x
`iO-(cid:1).
`Cortisol
`had
`negligible
`[3Hjdexamethasone
`various
`by
`of
`The
`displacement
`curves
`concentrations
`The
`steroids
`were
`inhibited
`also
`obtained.
`binding
`to the
`glucocorti-
`of
`[3H]dexamethasone
`50%
`RU 486,
`2.0
`dexametha-
`coid
`receptor
`were
`(in molar)
`1.0 x iO(cid:1).
`sone,
`1.2 x 10_a;
`and
`cortisol,
`includ-
`samples
`The
`concentrations
`of RU 486
`in 20 plasma
`two
`from a patient
`with
`Cushing’s
`syndrome
`(patient
`ing
`were measured
`by
`both
`the
`progesterone
`and
`glucocorticoid
`2). No
`significant
`difference
`between
`these
`RRAs
`RRAs
`(fig.
`found
`(P > .2).
`was
`Pharmacokinetic
`(mean

`S.E.)
`
`study.
`individual
`
`and
`
`plasma
`The
`pharmacokinetic
`
`concentrations
`properties
`
`1)
`
`of
`
`Discussion
`
`The mean
`reactive
`RU
`Because
`the
`of
`sampling,
`
`apparent
`486
`in
`terminal
`however,
`
`receptor-
`ofprogesterone
`half-life
`plasma
`h.
`about
`20
`our
`normal
`volunteers
`was
`log-linear
`phase
`was
`reached
`at 24 h
`not
`the
`actual
`half-life
`value may
`be
`consid-
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`jpet.aspetjournals.org
`
` at ASPET Journals on January 19, 2016
`
`404
`
`awa(cid:1)
`
`et al
`
`Vol.241
`
`of various
`1. CompetItion
`Fig.
`curves
`(displacement)
`receptor.
`uterus
`progesterone
`rat
`steroids
`for
`the
`as percentage
`of ccntrd
`bind-
`Results
`are expressed
`Ing in the absence
`ofcompetftors.
`Values
`shown were
`determined
`in duplicate.
`
`STEROID CONCENTRATION
`
`(M)
`
`et
`
`to
`
`at.,
`
`-..
`
`0 l
`
`U
`
`0 O
`
`:D
`
`Oj::
`
`04
`
`-I
`
`I
`
`200
`
`400
`
`600
`
`800
`
`PROGESTERONE
`REACTIVE
`-RU
`
`RECEPTOR
`486
`((cid:1)g/dI)
`
`of RU 486 measured
`concentrations
`plasma
`between
`Fig. 2. Correlation
`and glucocorticold
`and triangles
`RRAs. Cwcles
`by progesterone
`k(cid:1)dlcate
`a patient with Cushlng’s
`from normal
`volunteers
`and
`plasma
`samples
`RRAs was
`syndrome.
`respectively.
`No
`significant
`difference
`between
`.2).
`found
`(P >
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`
`8
`
`10
`
`12
`
`TIME
`
`16
`
`IS
`
`20
`
`22
`
`24
`
`14
`
`(h)
`
`Fig.
`concentrations
`3. Plasma
`RU 486 after oral administration
`volunteers.
`
`(PRR-)
`receptor-reactive
`of progesterone
`of 25 or 10 mg/kg
`of the drug to normal
`
`longer.
`erably
`to that
`reported
`(1985).
`et a!.
`with
`compared
`
`is similar
`value
`this
`caveat,
`potential
`this
`Despite
`by Shoupe
`and implied
`by Deraedt
`(1985)
`et a!.
`of RU 486
`is
`long
`plasma
`apparent
`The
`half-life
`those
`of other
`steroids,
`which
`range
`from mini-
`
`3 to 5 h (dexameth-
`(progesterone)
`ute8
`a!.,
`1966)
`(Little
`the
`approximation
`of
`closest
`The
`(Kawai
`et
`asone)
`1985).
`we
`can make
`in the
`is
`of RU 486
`rate
`that
`clearance
`metabolic
`the
`ab-
`If we
`assume
`that
`with
`Cushing’s
`syndrome.
`patients
`tract
`from the
`was
`100%,
`of RU 486
`gastrointestinal
`sorption
`constant
`infusion
`the metabolic
`clearance
`rate
`computed
`by the
`and
`4.0
`model
`(Tait
`1961)
`would
`range
`between
`0.84
`aL,
`et
`2.0)
`liters/kg/day.
`the
`of
`receptor-
`(mean,
`Because
`amount
`RU 486
`excreted
`in the
`of our
`less
`urine
`patients
`was
`reactive
`0.5% of
`the
`we
`suggest
`that
`than
`total
`daily
`dose,
`kidneys
`in the
`clearance
`and
`play
`an
`insignificant
`role
`this
`receptor-reactive
`metabolites.
`of RU 486 may
`half-life
`The
`long
`apparent
`plasma
`explain
`studies
`using
`other
`long
`biologic
`effect
`the
`single
`oral
`in
`seen
`of RU 486
`in man.
`fi-lipotropin
`(Gaillard
`cortisol,
`Plasma
`doses
`adrenocorticotropin
`and
`1984;
`Bert,agna
`et
`at.,
`et
`at.,
`1984)
`starting
`increased,
`but
`only
`levels
`clearly
`(Gaillard
`et a!.,
`1984)
`and
`only
`at hours
`the
`drug
`5 to
`6 h after
`of
`administration
`endogenous
`corticotropin-
`of presumably
`elevated
`(morning)
`of
`releasing
`hormone
`secretion.
`In addition,
`the
`concentrations
`5th-
`these
`hormones
`in plasma
`and
`24-h
`urinary
`17-ketogenic
`mid
`excretion
`higher
`than
`control
`in the
`2 days
`after
`remained
`a 6-mg/kg
`of RU 486
`(Gaillard
`dose
`a!.,
`1984).
`In nonhuman
`et
`primates,
`antagonist
`activity
`early
`RU
`486
`was
`observed
`as
`0.5 h after
`i.m.
`injection
`ofthe
`drug
`in the
`early morning
`(Healy
`The
`different
`time
`and mode
`of administration
`1985).
`et at.,
`486 may
`account
`for
`the
`observed
`differences
`RU
`in
`its
`of action
`in man
`and monkey.
`half-life
`plasma
`apparent
`long
`of
`One
`the
`reasons
`for
`the
`(and
`possibly
`binding
`of
`RU 486 may
`be the
`extensive
`drug
`this
`proteins.
`previously
`shown
`We
`have
`its metabolites)
`to plasma
`globulin
`to corticosteroid-binding
`bind
`that
`RU 486
`does
`not
`globulin
`(Nieman
`or
`testosterone-estradiol-binding
`et
`at.,
`suggested
`that
`a-i-acid
`have
`1985a).
`et
`at.
`(1986)
`Philibert
`of
`the
`plasma
`RU
`486
`some
`for
`account
`may
`glycoprotein
`binding.
`Because
`[3HJRU
`486
`to
`of
`binding
`specific
`intact
`the
`leukocytes
`mononuclear
`by
`severely
`inhibited
`human
`presence
`(4.5%)
`albumin
`concentration
`ofphysiologic
`ofhuman
`was much
`that
`of
`[3Hjdexamethasone
`less
`affected),
`(whereas
`we believe
`that
`the
`binding
`of RU 486
`to plasma
`albumin
`The
`concentration
`of
`receptor-
`pharmacologically
`important.
`the
`in the
`cerebrospinal
`fluid
`of
`patient
`with
`reactive
`486
`RU
`4% of her
`concurrent
`Cushing’s
`syndrome
`was
`approximately
`plasma
`concentration,
`in agreement
`the
`notion
`that
`only
`
`the
`drug
`
`of
`
`its
`
`onset
`
`as
`
`of
`
`of
`
`is
`
`was
`
`with
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`jpet.aspetjournals.org
`
` at ASPET Journals on January 19, 2016
`
`PROGESTERONE
`
`RADSORECEPTOR
`
`ASSAY
`
`Gl.UCOCORT1COID
`
`RADIORECEPTOR
`
`ASSAY
`
`Pharmacokin#{149}tIcs
`
`of RU 486
`
`in Man
`
`405
`
`1987
`
`Do
`
`00
`40‘law
`
`column)
`(open
`reactlvfties
`4. Receptor
`Fig.
`of plasma
`in the chromatographed
`frections
`(at peak
`samples
`from a normal
`volunteer
`24 h after
`of
`the
`level
`and
`admInIStratiOn
`drug)w(cid:1)d
`a patient with Cushing’s
`syndrome
`RU 486 orally. Shaded
`column
`who
`received
`represents
`percent
`recovery
`of
`[‘H]RU
`the
`486 in eech
`fraction.
`Frections
`are numbered
`from the origin
`of
`the
`thin-layer
`chromatog-
`RU 486 (RU 42
`rephy. N-rnonodemethylated
`RU 486
`(RU 42
`633) w(cid:1)d N-didemethylated
`4 and 2,
`848)
`correspond
`to
`frections
`i’s-
`
`ww
`
`Uw
`
`w
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`S
`
`FRACTION
`
`101112131415
`S
`NUMBER
`
`123
`
`4
`
`7
`6
`5
`FRACTiON
`
`5
`
`101112131415
`9
`NUNSER
`
`and
`the
`progesterone
`tivity. We
`suggest
`that
`in man
`is
`due
`primarily
`that
`hydrophilic
`products
`i1(cid:1)-phenyl
`chain.
`
`glucocorticoid
`circulating
`to RU
`lack
`one
`
`and
`receptor
`receptor
`RU 486
`secondarily
`486
`and
`or two methyl
`groups
`
`bioac-
`some
`reactivity
`to
`its
`in the
`
`Acknowledgments
`
`authors
`The
`RU 486
`this
`for
`Terry M. Wood
`
`for generously
`Rouseel-UCLAF
`like
`would
`thank
`to
`study. We are also grateful
`to Mr. Gerald
`W.
`Peden
`for
`their
`superb
`technical
`assistance.
`
`providing
`and Ms.
`
`References
`
`J. P., HussoN,
`glucocorticoid
`
`J. M. AND GmAiw,
`F.:
`in man.
`J. Clin.
`action
`
`quantitation
`the
`for
`ofprotein-dye
`
`of micro-
`binding.
`Anal.
`
`C., LuT0N,
`X., BSRTAGNA,
`BERTAGNA,
`RU 486
`new steroid
`inhibits
`analog
`The
`EndocrinoL
`Metab.
`25-28,
`1984.
`59:
`BatDrolw,
`M. M.: A rapid and sensitive
`method
`of protein
`utilizing
`the principle
`gram quantities
`Biochem.
`72:
`248-254,
`1976.
`C., BusIGNv, M., Ciumizr,
`C., MOUREN,
`P., Cous’ry,
`Dmt*zivr,
`R., BONNAT,
`of RU
`J.: Pharmacokinetics
`M.,
`PmLmnRr,
`D.,
`PorTrait,
`J. AND
`S(cid:1)usoN,
`In The Antiprogestin
`Steroid
`RU 486 and Human
`ad.
`Control,
`Fertility
`486.
`S. J. Segal,
`New York,
`Press,
`1985.
`pp.
`by E. E. Baulieu
`and
`103-122,
`Plenum
`R. C., RIONDEL,
`W. AND BAULIEU,
`A., MUu.na,
`A. F., HERRMANN,
`GMLt(cid:1).RD,
`E. E.: RU 486: A steroid
`with
`antiglucocorticosteroid
`activity
`that
`only
`disin-
`at a specific
`time ofday.
`Proc. NatL
`hibits
`the
`human
`pituitary-adrenal
`system
`81:
`3879-3882,
`1984.
`Aced.
`Sd.
`U.S.A.
`P. W. AND HoDcnN,
`H. M., GOLD,
`D. L, CHRousos,
`G. P., SCHULTE,
`HEALY,
`G. D.: Increased
`vasopressin
`aecre-
`adrenocorticotropin,
`cortisol,
`and
`arginine
`RU 486. Dose
`in primates
`tion
`after
`the
`antiglucocorticoid
`steroid
`response
`J. Clin. EndocrinoL
`60:
`relationships.
`Metab.
`1-4,
`1985.
`D., TguTscH,
`W., Wysa,
`R., RIONDEL,
`A.,
`PHiuanRT,
`HERRMAN,
`E. E.: The
`effects
`of an antiprogesterone
`steroid
`BAULIRU,
`AND
`the menstrual
`cycle and of early
`Interruption
`pregnancy.
`Comptes
`294:
`933-940,
`1982.
`Y. AND HoMsu, M.: Differences
`S.,
`ICHIKAWA,
`KAWAI,
`among
`cortisol,
`prednisolone,
`and
`deza.methaaone
`Accelerated
`metabolism
`ofdexamethasone
`in renal
`80:
`MetabL
`848-854,
`1985.
`Ki.ny, H. K., BARTMANN,
`E. AND
`non-protein-bound
`method
`to measure
`oestradiol
`by equilibrium
`dialysis:
`1977.
`Endocrinol.
`85:
`209-219,
`B. A., Uoocsei,
`KovAcs,
`L.,
`SA5, M.,
`RE5CH,
`M.
`ROWE,
`P.
`J.:
`Termination
`of very
`AND
`sntiprogestational
`compound.
`Contraception
`Ln’FLE,
`B.,
`Tiur,
`F., T(cid:1)rr,
`S. A.
`S.
`J.
`(cid:1)D
`progesterone
`of
`in males
`clearance
`rate
`Invest.
`901-912,
`1966.
`45:
`D.: RU 38486:
`PHu.manT,
`MOGUILEWSKY,
`M.
`AND
`to the
`cytosolic
`activity
`correlated
`with
`strong
`binding
`J. Steroid
`Biochem.
`followed
`by an
`impaired
`activation.
`
`of
`
`G., SAiuz, E.
`on women
`Rendus
`
`properties
`in metabolic
`diseases:
`liver
`and
`renal
`in
`J. Clin. EndocrinoL
`failure.
`
`KRUSKEMPER,
`fractions
`Comparison
`
`and rapid
`H. L: A simple
`of
`cortisol,
`testosterone
`end
`with centrifugal
`Acts
`filtration.
`
`G., SWAHN,
`early
`pregnancy
`29:
`399-410,
`ERnzNumn,
`ovariectomized
`
`M. L., BYGDEMAN,
`by RU 486-an
`1984.
`F.: The
`females.
`
`metabolic
`J. Cliii.
`
`and
`
`Potent
`antiglucocorticoid
`glucocorticoid
`receptor
`20:
`271-276,
`1984.
`
`-a
`
`z C E 1
`
`=-
`
`(cid:1) h:
`
`90a
`
`(1)
`
`(g/dI)
`Albumin Concentration
`and specific
`column)
`of albumin
`effect
`5. The
`on the
`total
`(open
`Fig.
`(sheded
`(cid:1)Iumn)
`binding
`of 20
`nM [‘HIRU 486
`or [‘HIdeXamethaSOne
`to
`(MNL). Results
`intect
`human mononuclear
`leukocytes
`we
`expressed
`as
`percentage
`of
`those
`in media without
`human
`albumin.
`Values
`shown
`were
`determined
`in duplicate.
`
`of
`
`this
`
`drug
`
`crosses
`
`plasma
`
`membranes
`
`and
`
`is
`
`fraction
`free
`the
`active.
`biologically
`concentrations
`plasma
`The
`effective
`were
`syndrome
`Cushing’s
`tients
`with
`cortisol
`plasma
`the mean
`greater
`than
`patients.
`This
`from
`was
`unexpected
`mononuclear
`the
`human
`leukocytes
`3 times
`greater
`which
`is approximately
`approximately
`[or, by deduction,
`asone
`1979)].
`that
`of cortisol
`(Murakami
`et
`at.,
`may
`the
`to plasma
`explain
`drug
`albumin
`fractions
`of
`the
`The
`chromatographic
`tive material(s)
`corresponded
`to RU 486
`N-didemethylated
`metabolites.
`Deraedt
`that
`metabolites
`have
`a high
`shown
`
`pa-
`the
`of RU 486
`times
`20
`more
`than
`these
`of
`concentrations
`of RU 486
`to
`the
`affinity
`receptor,
`glucocorticoid
`of dexameth-
`that
`than
`than
`18 times
`greater
`of
`The
`binding
`tight
`this
`discrepancy.
`plasma
`receptor-reac-
`and
`its N-mono-
`(1985)
`et
`at.
`binding
`affinity
`
`in
`
`and
`have
`for
`
`these
`
`

`

`406
`
`Kawal
`
`at al
`
`Vol.241
`
`with estradiolbinding
`
`sites
`
`in rat uteri.
`
`Endocrinology
`
`99:
`
`1091-1096,
`
`E. E.:
`in
`phase
`
`digitalis
`1976.
`SCHAISON,
`Effects
`normal
`SCHREIBER,
`progestin
`1983.
`D., MISHELL,
`JR., L(cid:1)c(cid:1)aR(cid:1),
`E., LAHTEENMAKI,
`M., Gu’rinminz,
`D. R.,
`SHOUPE,
`ofthe
`P. AND SpiTz,
`in
`antiprogesterone
`RU 486
`I. M.: Endocrunologic
`effects
`Steroid RU 486
`of normal women.
`In The
`AntiprOgestin
`and
`the
`luteal
`phase
`S. J. Segal, pp.
`Human
`Fertility
`Control,
`ad.
`by E. E. Baulieu
`and
`285-293,
`New York,
`Plenum
`Press,
`1985.
`J. F., T(cid:1)iT,
`S. A. S.,
`ThiT,
`LI1’FLE,
`in the plasma
`of7-W-d-aldosterone
`80,1961.
`
`A. AND
`N., REINBERO,
`LE8TRAT,
`M.,
`G., Ggoiws
`BAULIRU,
`RU 486
`during
`IDidlUteaI
`steroid
`antiprogeeterone
`the
`of
`J. Clin. EndocrinoL Metab.
`61:
`women.
`484-489,
`1985.
`J.
`it, Hsugs,
`A. J. W.
`E. E.: Binding
`(cid:1)tiD
`BAUUEU,
`RU 486
`steroid receptors.
`rat
`ovary
`to
`Contraception
`
`of the
`28:
`
`anti-
`77-85,
`
`B. AND LAUMAS,
`ofnormal
`subjects.
`
`K.
`
`It: The disappearance
`J. Clin.
`Invest
`40:
`72-
`
`Downloaded from
`
`jpet.aspetjournals.org
`
` at ASPET Journals on January 19, 2016
`
`Send
`Bethesd(cid:1)
`
`requests
`reprint
`MD 20893.
`
`to:
`
`Shunichi
`
`Kawai,
`
`M.D.,
`
`NIH,
`
`Bldg.
`
`10, Ran.
`
`10N262,
`
`RODSARD,
`in circulating
`
`D., LoRi(cid:1)ux,
`mononuclear
`
`D. L
`AND LIPS(cid:1)F,
`leukocytes.
`Endo-
`
`D. D.,
`T., BsAt(cid:1)DoN,
`MuiuKAMI,
`M. B.: Glucocorticoid
`receptor
`104:
`1979.
`500-505,
`crunology
`B. C.,
`I. M., Nisui.A,
`C., SpiTz,
`G. P., KELLNER,
`NIEMAN,
`L K.,
`CHRousos,
`D. L:
`C. W. AND
`G.
`R,
`CUTLER,
`G.
`B., MERRIAM,
`LORIAUX,
`BARmN,
`with the glucocorticoid
`of Cushing’s
`syndrome
`antagonist
`Successful
`treatment
`RU 486. J. Clin. EndocrunoL
`Metab.
`61:
`536-540,
`1985a.
`BARDIN, C. W.,
`L K., Hasiy,
`D. L,
`It,
`G.
`SpiTz,
`I. M., MnwuAu,
`NIEMAN,
`of the antiproges-
`G. P.: Use
`of single doses
`LORIAUX,
`D. L AND CHRousos,
`In The
`women.
`terone
`steroid
`RU 486
`for
`induction
`of menstruation
`in normal
`Steroid RU 486
`ad.
`E. E.
`and
`Antiprogestin
`Human
`Fertility
`Control,
`and S. J. Segal,
`New York,
`1985b.
`Baulieu
`pp.
`279-283,
`Plenum
`Press,
`D., Dga(cid:1)givr,
`R. AND TEUTSCH,
`G.: RU 38486-a
`PHIUSERT,
`potent
`antigluco.
`in vivo
`the VIII
`corticoid
`(Abstract
`1463,
`p. 668).
`Presented
`International
`to
`of Pharmacology,
`Tokyo,
`Japan,
`Congress
`1981.
`D., MOGUILEw5KY,
`M. AND PO’I’FIER,
`M.,
`BONNAT,
`C., BU5IGNY,
`PHILIBERT,
`of human
`on pharmacokinetics
`Influence
`alpha
`1-acid glycoprotein
`(AAG)
`biological
`activityofRU
`486(Abstract
`1006,p.
`282).
`Presentedtothe
`CA, 1986.
`Society, Anaheim,
`S. M., PiTA,
`J. C., JR. AND LORIAUX,
`RJFKA,
`
`by
`
`J.:
`and
`Endocrine
`
`D. L: Mechanism
`
`of interaction
`
`of
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket