throbber

`
`Precision Control of Eluted Activity from a Sr/Rb Generator
`for Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography
`
`R. Klein1, A. Adler2, R. S. Beanlands1, R. A. deKemp1
`1National Cardiac PET Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
`2School of Information Technology and Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
`
`Abstract(cid:151) A rubidium-82 (82Rb) elution system is described
`for use with clinical positron emission tomography. The system
`is self-calibrating with 1.4% repeatability, independent of
`generator activity and elution flow rate. Saline flow is switched
`between a 82Sr/82Rb generator and a bypass line to achieve a
`constant activity elution of 82Rb. In the present study, pulse
`width modulation (PWM) of a solenoid valve is compared to
`simple threshold control as a means to simulate a proportional
`valve. A predictive-corrective control algorithm is developed
`which produces a constant activity elution within the
`constraints of long feedback delay and short elution time.
`Accurate constant-activity elutions of 10-70% of the total
`generator activity were demonstrated using the threshold
`comparison control. The adaptive-corrective control of the
`PWM valve provided a substantial improvement in precision of
`the steady-state output.
`
`Keywords(cid:151)Strontium-82 Rubidium-82 generator, elution
`system control, cardiac PET imaging
`
`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`
`Eluting the generator at a constant flow rate results in a
`
`repeatable and characteristic curve of activity vs. volume
`over a wide range of flows [2], whereas the eluted activity
`vs. time is dependent on the saline flow rate [5]. The scale
`of the characteristic curve depends on the amount of 82Sr in
`the column, and the shape is characterized by an initial peak
`of high activity as the volume of the generator column is
`flushed (bolus stage) followed by an asymptotic decrease to
`an equilibrium of 82Rb production, flushing, and decay
`(continuous stage). The purpose of this study was to
`investigate the use of feedback control to obtain constant-
`activity elutions from the 82Rb generator.
`
`
`II. DESIGN
`
`
`A. System Description
`
`A bypass line of the generator is used with a single two-
`
`way solenoid pinch valve to direct flow through the
`generator or to bypass it (Fig.1). The lines are merged
`immediately upstream from an activity (positron) counter.
`The line volume between the generator and the activity
`counter is kept to a minimum, while ensuring significant
`shielding to reduce background counts from the generator.
`Downstream from the counter an additional two way pinch
`valve routes the elution to the patient outlet or to a shielded
`waste container.
`A constant flow rate F is set with a peristaltic pump.
`This allows for prediction of the activity at the patient outlet,
`Apat, after a transmission delay of D seconds, based on
`counts measured at the activity counter, Cdet using
`
`
`D
`−λ
`
`⋅
`
`e
`
`⋅
`
`K
`
`
`
`(1)
`
`
` Myocardial perfusion imaging with the radiotracer
`
`rubidium-82 (82Rb) and positron emission tomography
`(PET) is used commonly to diagnose coronary artery
`disease. Absolute measurements of perfusion can also be
`made from the rate of tracer uptake using dynamic PET
`imaging [1]. To facilitate reproducible measurements, the
`tracer should be introduced at a constant rate over a short
`period of time (30 s). 82Rb is produced from a 82Sr/82Rb
`generator and has a very short half-life (76 s). Therefore it
`requires direct intravenous infusion to the patient with an
`automated generator elution system [2].
`82Sr/82Rb generators have been described by our group
`
`and others for the production of 82Rb [3,4]. The generator is
`an ion-exchange column of tin-oxide that binds the parent
`isotope 82Sr (25 day half-life) but not the daughter 82Rb
`resulting from 82Sr decay. Therefore 82Rb is eluted from the
`generator simply by flushing with 0.9% saline. In the
`generator column, 82Rb exists at equilibrium levels with 82Sr
`and regenerates within 10 minutes after elution, making this
`tracer convenient for rapid serial perfusion studies.
`
`Computer (with data-acquisition card)
`
`A
`
`pat
`
`
`
`tCDt )( )(
`
`
`=
`+
`det
`
`
`
`
`
`where λ=ln(2)/76 is the 82Rb decay constant. The calibration
`constant K, accounting for the intrinsic and geometric
`efficiency of the activity counter is used to convert counter
`readings to 82Rb activity in Bq/ml.
`
`
`Saline
`Supply
`
`Peristaltic
`Pump
`
`Activity Counter
`
`Dose Calibrator
`or Patient Outlet
`
`Generator
`Valve
`
`82Rb/82Sr
`Generator
`
`Patient
`Valve
`
`Waste
`Container
`
`Patient
`Outlet
`
`Fig. 1 (cid:150) 82Rb elution
`system diagram showing
`saline line (thick lines),
`control signals, sensor
`signals,
`and
`major
`components.
`
`
`
`1 of 4
`
`JUBILANT EXHIBIT 1013
`Jubilant v. Bracco, IPR2018-01449
`
`

`

`Integral Activity at Patient Outlet (vial) - No Aperture Correction
`
`Detector: Convolved
`Calibrator: Delayed
`
`150
`100
`50
`Integral Activity at Patient Outlet (vial) - With Aperture Correction
`
`200
`
`Detector: Convolved
`Calibrator: Delayed
`
`15
`
`10
`
`05
`
`0
`
`15
`
`10
`
`150
`
`200
`
`
`
`50
`
`05
`
`0
`
`Integral Activity (MBq)
`
`Integral Activity (MBq)
`
`100
`Time (s)
`Fig. 2 (cid:150) Integral activity at the vial as measured by the dose calibrator (thin
`line) and estimated from the activity counter (thick line). The lower graph
`demonstrates the improvement in the estimate due to compensation for the
`aperture of the dose calibrator (γ=0.01). Flow rate is 5ml/min.
`
`Start pump
`All lines flushed and primed
`Constant elution through generator
`Threshold reached
`Start control of generator valve
`Constant activity reached
`Switch flow from waste to patient
`Desired total activity reached
`Switch generator valve to bypass
`All activity flushed to patient
`Stop pump
`Fig. 3 - Constant activity elution sequence diagram.
`
`
`
` A
`
` second, approach involved the simulation of a
`variable pinch valve by pulse-width-modulation (PWM) of
`the saline flow [6]. The valve was vibrated at 5Hz and the
`duty cycle was controlled. A minimum (cid:145)on(cid:146) time, Tmin, is
`required to overcome the valve spring and cause it to move
`which limits the vibration frequency. The PWM was
`implemented in a single software block, and allowed us to
`develop the remaining control algorithms as if controlling a
`variable pinch valve (Fig. 4).
`(PID)
`The
`traditional Proportional-Integral-Differential
`controller has some inherent shortcomings which make it
`inadequate for this application. These include a varying
`feedback delay due to different saline flow rates. In addition,
`a PID loop will always lag in response to the error as a result
`of feedback delay. Finally, the short elution time and low
`sampling frequency do not allow for long stabilization
`times.
`
`
`Fig. 4 - Pulse-width-modulation control of a solenoid valve to simulate a
`variable pinch valve. Flow through the generator increases as the duty cycle
`is increased.
`
`
`
`=
`
`pat
`
`∑∑
`
`K
`
`=
`
`
`
`(3)
`
`Ft
`
` )(tG
`ce
`
`=
`The parameter γ was adjusted emperically based on a
`
`series of calibration runs at 5-25 ml/min. The resulting plots
`corresponded more closely in shape, especially at low flow
`rates of 5-10 ml/min.
`
`C. Constant Activity Elution and Control Algorithms
`
`The readings from the activity counter are used as
`
`feedback to a real-time control system, which controls the
`pinch valve to achieve a constant activity rate. Initially, the
`patient valve routes the elution to the waste until the
`threshold activity is reached (Fig. 3). It is switched by the
`control system to the patient outlet after the flow delay from
`the activity counter to the patient valve. This removes the
`initial transient rise of activity to produce a step response at
`the patient outlet. The elution continues until the desired
`total activity has been produced. At the end of the elution
`the generator valve is closed creating a step drop in output.
`The elution of saline is continued through the bypass line to
`flush the activity from the counter to the patient outlet.
`Two approaches to control the generator/bypass valve
`were explored. The threshold comparison approach controls
`the valve through comparison of the instantaneous activity
`rate to the set point. This results in activity fluctuations
`around the desired set point. The set point was compensated
`for hysteresis using a single factor that was empirically
`determined and verified to be 1.2 and is independent of flow
`rate.
`
`B. Calibration
`
`An external dose calibrator (Capintec CRC-15R) is used
`as the gold standard for comparison of the accumulated
`counter readings both for calibration and testing. Calculation
`of the calibration constant was modified from that described
`in [2] using
`
`
`
`
`−λτ
`
`
`
`D
`
`−λ
`
`(2)
`
`(cid:136)
`∑
`
`tA )(
`e
`
`tA (
`)

`−
`⋅
`cal
`cal
`∑
`
`A
`t)(
`eF
`e
`
` tC )((
`
`t
`)
`
`−λ
`⊗
`⋅
`det
`The effective delay from the activity counter to the dose
`calibrator, τ, was determined through minimization of the
`mean square error between the calibrator readings, ´cal, and
`the predicted accumulated activity in the vial, Apat.
`
`Calibration runs were carried out at a flow rate of
`15ml/min over 60 seconds. Over the entire elution and the
`following 120 seconds, readings from the activity counter
`and the dose calibrator were recorded simultaneously at 1
`second intervals. Plotting of ´cal and Apat reveals slightly
`different shapes of the calibrator vs. detector curves (Fig.2).
`This was determined to be due to detection of activity in the
`patient line upstream from the patient outlet. An additional
`convolution kernel was created to describe this geometric
`aperture. The kernel was estimated to have the shape of a
`normalized Gaussian over the interval |-∞,0] with the width
`adjusted for the geometry of the dose calibrator.
`
`
`(
`)2
`γ−
`
`2 of 4
`
`

`

`
`
`To overcome the shortcoming of the PID controller, a
`predictive-corrective controller was developed. The activity
`from the generator is predicted based on the activity-volume
`curves measured during the same day(cid:146)s calibration run. A
`ratio of the desired activity and the predicted instantaneous
`activity is used as an estimate of the position of the variable
`valve. A PID feedback loop uses the measured count errors
`to correct the valve position.
`
`D. PWM Controlled Valve Calibration
`
`
`At the end of an elution the discrepancy in elution time
`is used to adjust Tmin. This iterative process adapts the
`estimation of Tmin over time. Tmin is expected to change due
`to material fatigue, change of tubing and other system
`variations. In our system Tmin converged to 162ms within
`less than 20 elutions and has not changed significantly since.
`Since the long Tmin corresponds to a minimum duty
`cycle of 80.1% a relatively small active range of the PWM
`is left for control. Since the implementation is in discrete
`time, this results in a reduced resolution of the control
`signal. The number of quantized steps, Q, is given by (4)
`where M (Hz) is the software model refresh rate and V (Hz)
`is the vibration frequency. In our case the model is run at
`2000Hz resulting in 78 quantized steps.
`
`
`
`(4)
`
`(
`1
`
`−
`
`VT
`min
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`VM
`
`
`
`
`Q
`
`=
`
`
`
`
`III. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
`
`
`A. Calibration
`
`Daily calibration runs were conducted as described
`above to test for repeatability of the calibration and test for
`variation over time. Additional calibration runs were carried
`out at flow rates ranging from 5 to 25ml/min to test the
`accuracy of the physical model with changing flows.
`
`
`x 10-4
`
`Variation in calibration constant over time
`
`3
`
`2
`
`1
`
`Calibration constant
`
`5
`
`10
`
`20
`15
`Variation in activity over time
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`0123
`
`0
`
`Calibration constant
`
`1500
`
`1000
`
`500
`
`Activity
`
`B. Constant Activity Elutions
`
` A
`
` series of 30 s constant-activity elutions was carried
`out for desired output activity in the range of 10-70% of the
`total calibration activity. Output activity was measured
`relative to the calibration activity to accommodate for the Sr
`decay over the course of the study. Both threshold
`comparison control and adaptive-corrective controls were
`assessed for comparison.
`
`
`
`IV. RESULTS
`
`
`A. Calibration
`
`Over the life-span of one generator, 35 calibration runs
`were conducted at 15ml/min flow rate (Fig. 5). The
`calibration constant appears unchanged with a standard
`deviation of 1.4% over time.
`Calibration values were analyzed at flow rates ranging
`from 5-25 ml/min (Fig. 6). The value of the calibration
`constant did not vary over the range 10-25 ml/min, but at 5
`ml/min decreased slightly. The reason for this variation has
`not been determined but is not of much concern as this low
`flow rate is an extreme case and is not typically used in
`clinical application.
`
`B. Constant Activity Elutions
`
`Table 1 shows the mean square error (MSE), elution
`time error, and dose error as a function of the desired
`relative dose. These data show the desired elution time is
`achieved using
`the
`threshold comparison control but
`fluctuations cause a >30% mean squared error. The
`proposed control method improves the MSE at intermediate
`activities but performs less well at the extremes. These
`results are partly artifacts of the initial activity peak after the
`threshold activity is detected (Fig. 7). The source of this
`peak has not yet been confirmed, but is expected to be a
`sudden drop in back pressure as the patient valve is switched
`
`
`x 10-4
`
`Variation in calibration due to flow rate
`
`0
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10
`
`20
`15
`Date (days)
`Fig. 5 (cid:150) Calibration constant over the course of a generator life (top) and
`the dose from the generator during calibration over the same time period
`(bottom)
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`
`
`0
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10
`
`20
`
`25
`
`15
`Flow Rate (ml/min)
`Fig. 6 (cid:150) Calculated calibration constant over the range of flow rates.
`
`30
`
`
`
`3 of 4
`
`

`

`and did not detect significant breakthrough activity. Even
`after exceeding this specification by approximately 50%,
`breakthrough activity remained 15 and 13 times below the
`82Sr and
`85Sr
`established breakthrough
`limits
`for
`respectively. This leads us to believe that breakthrough is
`not significantly accelerated by using
`the
`feedback
`controlled elutions, but more experience is required for
`confirmation.
`
`
`V. CONCLUSION
`
`
`
`We have demonstrated a feedback control system for
`82Rb/82Sr generators to achieve constant-activity elutions. In
`addition we have confirmed the understanding of the
`physical model through successful calibration at various
`flow rates and generator activity. Work to date indicates that
`using pulse-width-modulation to simulate a variable position
`valve will enable constant-activity elutions with improved
`precision. In addition a predictive-corrective algorithm is
`able to control the modulation, however, more work is still
`required to reduce the initial transient overshoot.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENT
`
`
` We would like to thank May Aung and Kimberly
`Gardner for their collaboration and feedback during the
`initial clinical trials of the system.
`
`
`
`
`REFERENCES
`
`[1]
`
`J. W. Lin, R. R. Sciacca, R. L. Chou, A. F. Laine, S. R.
`Bergmann, (cid:147)Quantification of myocardial perfusion in human
`subjects using 82Rb and wavelet-based noise reduction(cid:148), J. Nucl.
`Med., Vol. 42, No. 2, February 2001.
`[2] N. J. Epstein, A. Benelfassi, R. S. Beanlands, R. A. deKemp, (cid:147)A
`82Rb infusion system for quantitative perfusion imaging in 3D
`PET(cid:148), App. Radiat. Isot, In Press, 2004.
`[3] T. M. Alvarez-Diez, R. A. deKemp, R. S. Beanlands, J. Vincent,
`(cid:147)Manufacture of strontium-82/rubidium-82 generators and
`quality control of rubidium-82 chloride for myocardial perfusion
`imaging in patients using positron emission tomography(cid:148), Appl.
`Radiat. Isot., Vol. 50, pp 1015-1023, 1999.
`[4] Y. Yano, (cid:147)Essentials of a Rubidium-82 generator for nuclear
`medicine(cid:148), Appl. Radiat. Isot., Vol 38, No 3, pp. 205-211, 1987.
`[5] V. Dhawan, (cid:147)Model for 82Sr/82Rb generator elution profiles: A
`second approach to radioawway/dosimetry(cid:148), Appl. Radiat. Isot.,
`Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 233-239, 1987.
`[6] T. Imaizumi, O. Oyama, Yoshimitsu T., (cid:147)Study of pneumatic
`servo system employing solenoid valve instead of proportional
`valve by keeping the solenoid valve plunger to be floating(cid:148),
`Flucom Symposium Proceedings, article 076, 2000.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Desired Dose
`(% calibration
`activity)
`
` TABLE I
`CONSTANT FLOW RATE RESULTS
`
`Elution Time
`Error (%)
`
`Eluted Dose
`Error
`(%)
`
`Mean Squared
`Errors (%)
`[steady-state]
`Threshold Comparison Control
`9.8
`31.6
`-6.7
`5.5
`33.9
`-13.3
`3.6
`34.0
`0.0
`7.3
`26.6
`-3.3
`Predictive-Corrective Control with PWM
`42.4
`[42.9]
`16.7
`5.0
`21.6
`[15.7]
`-3.3
`3.9
`27.6
`[8.8]
`-3.3
`6.2
`37.7
`[25.5]
`26.7
`2.3
`
`10
`30
`50
`70
`
`10
`30
`50
`70
`
`Activity Rate (MBq/s)
`
`Activity Rate (MBq/s)
`
`Instantaneous Activity at Patient Outlet - Threshold Comparison Control
`
`0123
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`35
`Time (s)
`Instantaneous Activity at Patient Outlet - Predictive-Corrective Control and PWM
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`
`
`0123
`
`10
`
`35
`Time (s)
`Fig. 7 - Similar elutions at 50% generator capacity using the threshold
`comparison algorithm (top) and the adaptive-corrective control with PWM
`valve control (bottom). The dotted lines show the desired profile.
`
`
`from waste to patient outlet, resulting in a surge of active
`saline from the generator. Fig. 7 demonstrates sample
`elutions of 50% generator activity. The threshold control
`results in a MSE of 34.0%. With the exception of the initial
`peak during the first 4 s, the steady state MSE is only 8.8%
`and results partly from correction of the initial peak.
`As mentioned above, the high duty-cycle threshold,
`Tmin, required to vibrate the valve significantly limits the
`resolution of variable valve implementation. To date we
`have implemented the vibration control in software. Future
`improvements would implement the PWM in hardware
`using a timer. With counters running in the MHz range, the
`control signal resolution would be 3 orders of magnitude
`higher than our current implementation, and may help to
`further reduce the steady state MSE.
`
`C. Breakthrough Sr Activity
`
`
`Elution of 82Sr and 85Sr isotopes (half-life 25 and 65
`days respectively) to the patient is undesired, as Sr tends to
`accumulate in the bone marrow, which is particularly
`radiation sensitive.
`Daily calibration samples are used to test for the
`breakthrough of Sr activity. Our generator is limited to 20 L
`of elution for clinical use. After expiry we continued testing
`
`4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket