throbber
IgM pentamer (900 kDa) is a potential disadvantage in that dist1'ibution of the large
`molecule may be restricted. However, it is possible to produce Fab fragments oflgM.
`Coupling in vitro immunization with the standard fusion procedure io this
`study led to a fusion frequency of I 00% with all hybrid lines secreting antibodies.
`Despite the success of the fusion, none of the hybridomas secreted anti-receptor
`immunoglobulins, as assessed by the receptor binding assay used.
`In summary, no sera positive for receptor binding activity was found following
`in vivo immunization with crude membrane preparations. in vitro immunization was
`undertaken because the technique offered a number of potential advantages, but a
`successful fusion did not lead to hybridomas secreting supematants with receptor
`binding activity.
`
`References
`
`BOSS, B. D. (1984). An impl'oved in vitro immunization procedure for the production of monoclonal
`antibodies against neural and other antigens. Brain Res., 291, I 93-t 96.
`
`BOSS, B. D. (1986). An improved in vitro imn1uni:r..ation procedure for the production of monoclonal
`antibodies. Methods Enzymol., 121, 27-33.
`
`CHANTRY, A., LEIGHTON, a. & DAY, A. J. (1991). Cross-reactivity of amylio with calcitonin(cid:173)
`gene-related peptide binding sites in rat liver and skoletal muscle membranes. Biochem.J., 277, 139-
`143.
`
`DEBLASI, A., O'REILLY, K. & MOTULSKY, M. J, ( 1989). Calculating receptor number from
`binding experiments using same compound as radioligand and competitor. Trends Pharmacol. Sci .•
`10, 227-229.
`
`GALFRE, G. & MILSTEIN, C. (1981). Preparation of monoclonal antibodies: strategies and
`procedures. Methods Enzymol., 73, 3-46.
`
`GODING, J. W. ( 1986). Monoclonal anlibodies: Prfnclples and Practice. London: Academic Press.
`
`HAWKES, R. (1986). The dot immunobinding assay. Methods E11zymol., 121, 484-491.
`
`HENKE, H., SIGRIST, S., LANG, W., SCHNEIDER, J. & FISCHER, J. A. (1987). Comparison of
`binding sites for the calcitonin gene-related peptides l and II in man. Brain Res., 410, 404-408.
`
`INAGAKI, S., KITO, S., KUBOTA, Y., GfRGIS, S., HILLYARD, C. J. & MACINTYRE. I. (1986).
`
`130
`
`

`

`Autoradiographic localization of calcitonin gene-related peptide binding sites in hwnan and rat
`brains. Brain Res., 374, 287-298.
`
`NAKAMUTA, H., FUKUDA, Y., KOIDA, M., FUID, N., OTAKA, A., FVNAKOSHI, S., YAJIMA,
`II., MITSUYASU, N. & ORLOWSKI, R. C. (I 986). Binding sites of calcltonin gene-related
`peptide (CGRP): abundant occurrence in visceral organs. Jpn.lPharmaco/., 42, 17 5-180.
`
`READING, C. L. (I 982). Theory and methods for immunization in culture and monoclonal antibody
`production. J.Jmmuno/.Methods, 53, 261-291.
`
`READING, C. L. (1986). In vitro inmunization for the production of antigen specific lymphocyte
`hybridomas. Methods Enzymol., 121, 18-27.
`
`ROTH, R. A. & MORGAN, D. 0. {1985). Monoclonal antibodies to tJ,e insulin receptor.
`Pharmacol. Ther., 28, 1- 16.
`
`SOOS, M. A., SIDDLE, K., BARON, M. D., HEWARD, J. M., LUZ[O, J. P., BELLATJN, J. &
`LENNOX, E. S. (1986). Monoclonal antibodies reacting with multiple epitopes on the human
`insulin receptor. 8iochem.J., 235, 199-208.
`
`STANGL, 0., MUFF, R., SCHMOLCK, C. & FISCHER, J. A. (1993). Photoaffinity labeling of rat
`calcitonin gene-related peptide receptors and adenylate cyclase activation: identification of receptor
`subtypes. Endocrinology, 132, 744-750,
`
`WfMALA WANSA, S. J. & EL-KHOLY, A. A. (1993). Comparative study of distribution and
`biochemical characterization of brain calcitonin gene-related peptide receptors in five different
`species. Neuroscience, 54, 513-5 19.
`
`131
`
`

`

`CHAPTERS
`
`Characterization of CGRP receptor binding of monoclonal
`antibodies raised by an auto-anti-idiotypic approach or by
`immunization with purified CGRP receptor
`
`6.1. Introduction
`
`The anti-idiotypic approach to the production of anti-receptor antibodies is based on
`the idiotypic-anti-idiotypic network hypothesis (Jcme, 1974; Jcme et al., 1982).
`Idiotopes are antigenic determinants
`located
`in
`the variable
`regions of
`immunoglobuJin molecules. The network hypothesis was formulated in recognition of
`the dual character of immu.noglobulin molecules which consist of two distinct entities:
`combining site, or paratope, which interacts with antigens (epitopes), and idiotopes,
`which can be recognized by the paratopes carried on other antibody molecules. The
`anti-idiotypic response is heterogeneous and the network hypothesis attempts to
`classify the different kinds of idiotype-anti-icliotype interactions. The major criterion
`used to distinguish the different anti-idiotypic antibodies is the location of the target
`icliotope to which the anti-icliotype binds in relation to the antigen combining site
`(paratope). The location of the target idiotope can be mapped using the relevant
`antigen or hapten as the inhibitor in the binding of anti-idiotope to idiotope. If antigen
`no inhibition is observed, the target idiotope is assumed to be distant from the
`paratope, and perhaps located in a framework region (Bona & Kohler, 1984). Such
`antigen non-inhibitable anti-idiotypes are called Ab2a. If antigen inhibits the
`idiotope-anti-idiotope interaction, the target idiotope is believed to be in or near the
`paratope. Such anti-idiotypic antibodies, whose idiotopes cross-react with foreign
`epitopes, are postulated to bear the internal image of the original antigen and are
`classified as Ab2l3. Other anti-idiotypes have been classified, for exam.pie, Ab2y
`which are not internal image-bearing but nevertheless antigcn-inhibitable through
`steric interference (Bona & Kohler, 1984).
`The above classification of anti-idiotypes is probably simplistic and concepts
`are being revised (Kohler et al., 1989; Erlanger, 1989). However, the concept of
`internal image bearing anti-idiotypic antibodies has offered the possibility of
`developing anti-receptor antibodies by immunizing with anti-ligand antibodies and,
`therefore, bypass the need to purify the receptor. The network hypothesis further
`predicts that immunization with a ligand would lead to anti-ligand antibodies (Ab1)
`which would, in turn, lead to anti-idiotypic antibodies (Ab2) in the same animal. Jt
`should be possible to screen for internal image-bearing Ab2P anti-idiotypes which
`mimic the ligand and bind to receptor.
`
`132
`
`

`

`The anti-idjotypic route to anti-receptor antibodies was first reported by Sege
`& Peterson (1978) who demonstrated that anti-idiotypic antibodies raised against
`antibodies to insulin could reproduce certain biological actions of the hormone itself
`upon binding to the insulin receptors of rat thymocytes. The findings were confirmed
`by Schechter et al. (1982) who also showed for the first time that immunization of
`mice with insulin led to the development of not only anti-insulin antibodies but also
`autologous anti-idiotypic anti-insulin receptor antibodies. These findings suggested
`that a normally functioning anti-idiotypic network exists and that there is an auto-anti(cid:173)
`idiotypic route to anti-receptor antibodies.
`Anti-receptor MAbs have been successfully generated by the two-step anti(cid:173)
`idiotypic approach which consists of the isolation of an appropriate anti-ligand
`antibody followed by immunization with the purified anti-ligand antibody. A critical
`success factor for the two-step approach is that the anti-ligand antibody (Abl) used
`for immm1ization should mimic the receptor as closely as possible. If an anti-idiotypic
`antibody that binds to the ligand binding site of the receptor is desired, an Ahl that
`binds to the receptor binding site of the ligand must be identified. This is particularly
`difficult for macromolecular ligands that possess multiple epitopes, onJy one of which
`reacts with the receptor binding site. In practice, the identification of an Abl as a
`surrogate receptor can be time-consuming and is often left to chance. The generation
`of the appropriate Ab2 also relies on coupling of the ligand at a site that preserves its
`specificity for the receptor binding site. Despite the successes reported with the two(cid:173)
`step approach (reviewed by Strosberg, 1989), accounts of failures have occasionally
`reached the literature, for example, the failure to generate anti-02 dopamine receptor
`antibodies (Abbott & Strange, 1986) and anti-aldostcrone receptor antibodies
`(Lombcs et al., 1989a).
`The feasibility of the one-step auto-anti-idiotypic approach to anti-receptor
`MAbs was first reported by Cleveland et al. (1983) who obtained anti-nicotinic
`acctylcholine receptor MAbs by immunizing mice with a structurally-constrained
`nicotinic receptor agonist. In addition to the lack of need to purify receptor, the one(cid:173)
`step approach offers a further time-saving advantage that the choice of the appropriate
`anti-ligand antibody is left to the idiotypic network rather than the experimenter.
`Other successes with this approach include the development of MAbs against the
`glucocorticoid (Cayanis et al., 1986), adenosine (Ku et al., 1987), aldosterone
`(Lombes et al., 1989b) and thyrotropin (Taub et al., 1992) receptors.
`The major objective of the present study was to screen MAbs raised by an
`auto-anti-idiotypic approach for CORP receptor binding properties. The development
`of anti-CORP receptor MAbs by the conventional approach of immunization with
`purified receptor was pursued by Wimalawansa ( 1992). The MAbs were initially
`
`133
`
`

`

`screened by ELISA with immobilized receptor purified from porcine cerebellum and
`had not been screened for receptor binding using rat or human tissues. Thus a further
`objecHve of the study was to screen these anti-porcine CGRP receptor MAbs for
`cross-reactivity with the rnt and human CGRP receptors.
`
`6.2. Methods
`
`6.2.1. Source of potential anti-receptor MAbs studied
`
`The MAbs studied in the present investigation come from two sources. Dr. C.
`Plumpton (Clinical Pharmacology Unit. Cambridge) provided 13 MAbs which were
`produced using an auto•anti-idiotypic approach. The MAbs were raised in mice which
`were immunized with RcxCGRP (described in Chapter 3) and cloned twice on the
`basis that the antibodies do not bind Rcx.CGRP but do bind affinity-purified rabbit
`P Abs against Rex.CG RP. These MAbs were coded Id 1 to Id 13 and were all isotyped as
`lgM. The ld MAbs used in the present study had been affouty purified by the use of
`an anti-mouse K light chain MAb column.
`Dr. S. Wimalawansa (Department of Medicine and Chemical Pathology, Royal
`Postgraduate Medical School, London) provided 5 MAbs which were raised against a
`CGRP receptor purified from porcine cerebellum (Wimalawansa, 1992; Wimalawansa
`et al., l 993). These MAbs were coded with the prefix RCG. Hybridoma supernatants
`were used in the present study.
`
`6.2.2. Receptor binding studies
`
`Materials
`
`2-[ !251]-iodohistidyl I 0-Ha.CGRP
`
`SK-N-MC cells
`
`Specific activity 2000 Ci/mmol (Amarsham )
`A TCC No. HTB I 0
`
`Binding buffer (rat brain and SK•N-MC cells) 1
`Bacitracin
`BSA
`MgCl2.6H20
`Tris I-ICI (pl-I 7.4)
`
`0.25%
`5mM
`50mM
`
`0.625 mg/m l
`
`1The binding buffer u~ed was similar lo that used for the liver membrane binding assay witJ1 the
`omission ofaprotinin and PMSF.
`
`134
`
`

`

`Wash buffer
`MgCl2.6H20
`Tris HCI (pH 7.4)
`
`5mM
`
`SOmM
`
`6.2.2.1. Experimental procedures
`
`6.2.2.J.J. Rat liver membrane preparatio11
`
`Rat liver membrane was prepared and binding assay performed according to the
`methods described in Chapter 5.
`
`6.2.2.J.2. Rat ,vl,o/e brain membra11e preparatio11
`
`Eight Sprague-Dawley rats weighing approximately 300 g were srunned and
`guillotined. The whole brain was dissected out and kept in saline on ice. These were
`weighed in a 50 ml homogenizing tube and homogenized in approximately 50 ml
`buffer (50 mM Tris HCI pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCl2). The homogenate was diluted to a
`total 20 volumes of buffer (i.e. 20 ml/kg), mixed on ice, and centrifuged at 48,000 g
`(20,000 rpm) at 4°C in a RC5C Sorvall Instruments (Dupont) centrifuge. The
`supernatant was discarded, the pellet resuspended in 20 volumes of buffer and the
`centrifugation repeated. The above step was repeated, giving 3 identical spins in all.
`The final resuspension was made in 2 volumes of buffer. One ml aliquots of the
`membrane suspension was stored at -20°C. Protein concentration was determined by
`the Biorad protein assay (see Chapter 4).
`
`6.2.2.J.3. SK-N-MC l111ma11 11euroblastoma cell membra11e preparatio11
`
`SK-N-MC cells were harvested, spun down and the pellet weighed (approximately
`0.25 g). Cells were then homogenized with 20 strokes of a glass-Teflon homogenizer
`at 650 rpm in 20 volumes (i.e. 20 ml/g) of 5 mM Tris HCI pH 7.4. The homogenate
`was cenLrifuged at 48,000 g (20,000 rpm) for 20 minutes at 4°C in a RC5C Sorvall
`centrifuge. The supernatant was discarded, the pellet resuspended as above in 20
`volumes of 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.4 and left on ice for I hour to allow cell lysis. The
`above spin was then repeated. The pellet was resuspended in 20 volumes of buffer
`(50 mM Tris HCI pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCl2) and the membrane preparation stored in
`aliquots at -20°C.
`
`135
`
`

`

`6.2.2.1.4. Binding assay (rat wltole brain or SK-N-MC cell membra11e preparatio11)
`
`Whatman GF/C filters were soaked in 0.5% polyethyleneimine for at least 2 hours
`prior to filtering. The appropriate volume of rat bra.in membrane suspension was
`thawed, re-homogenized using a glass-Teflon homogenizer, and diluted to 2.5 mg/ml
`with 50 mM Tris HCI buffer pH 7.4 containing 5 mM MgCl2. SK-N-MC cell
`membranes were thawed, re-homogenized and used undiluted (approximately 100-
`200 µg protein per tube).
`The assay volume was 250 µI . Twenty-five µl of unlabelled CORP was added
`to each tube to give final concentrations of 10-12 to 10-7 M. Tubes for total binding
`contained assay buffer only. Non-specific binding tubes contained I o-7 M of
`unlabelled CGRP. Twenty-five
`µI
`of
`2-[ 1251]-iodohistidyl 10.Ha.CGRP
`(approximately 36,000 cpm) was added to each tube to give a final concentration of
`40 pM. The appropriate volume of assay buffer was added. One hundred µl of
`membrane suspension (250 µg protein for rat brain) was added to each tube. The tubes
`were vortex mixed and the assay mixture incubated for 60 minutes at room
`temperature.
`For the screening of antibodies, 50 µI Id MAb solutions were added to the
`polypropylene tubes (Starstedt) to give final concentrations of 15 to 60 µg/ml. r◄ ifty
`µl RCG MAb culture supernatants were tested. In some experiments MAbs were
`incubated with membranes for 5 days at 4 °C prior to addition of 2-[ 12511-
`iodohistidyl 10.Ha.CGRP and further incubation for 1 hour at room temperature. No
`difference in total and non-specific binding was observed after the 5 day incubation of
`the membrane suspension at 4°C compared with freshly
`thawed membrane
`suspension.
`Samples were .filtered through the pre-soaked GF/C filters on a Brandel 24-
`well cell harvester, followed by three washes with 3 ml ice-cold wash buffer. Filter
`paper was placed into counting tubes and counted for 1 minute in a LKB Wallac 1272
`Clinigamma counter with four 1.5 inch detectors.
`
`6.2.3. lmmunocytochemistry
`
`6.2.3.1. Principles
`
`The immunocytochemical method used in the present study was based on the Avidin(cid:173)
`Biotin Complex (so-called ABC) system. The immunoperoxidasc staining technique
`employed an unlabelled primary antibody, followed by a biotinylated secondary
`antibody and then a pre-formed avidin and biotinylated horseradish peroxidase
`macromolecular complex.
`
`136
`
`

`

`Avidin is a large glycoprotein from egg white which has a very high affinity
`(four binding sites per molecule) for biotin, a vitamin of low molecular weight found
`in egg yolk. Biotin can be coupled to antibody in high molecular proportion, or to a
`label such as peroxidase. Avidin may also be labelled with, for example, peroxidase
`or fluoresccin. The complex of avidin and biotinylated peroxidase are reacted together
`in such proportion that some biotin-binding sites on the avidin molecule are not fi1 led
`by biotinylated peroxidase, but are free to react with the biotin of the second antibody.
`The substitution for avidin with streptavidin, derived from Streptococcus
`avidini, offers some advantages. The streptavidin molecule is uncharged relative to
`animal tissue, unlike avidin which has an isoelectric point of 10, and therefore
`electrostatic binding to tissue is eliminated. In addition, streptavidin does not contain
`carbohydrate groups which might bind to tissue lectins. A streptavidin-biotinylated
`horseradish peroxidase complex was evaluated in the present study.
`The Vectastain® Elite ABC kit eventually chosen in the present study
`contained Avidin DH and biotinylated horseradish peroxidase H reagents which have
`been prepared to form ideal complexes for immunoperoxidase staining.
`
`Materials
`
`Nonnal horse serum
`
`Anti-mouse K light chain MAb I 87. I (biotinylated by C. Plumpton)
`
`Biotiny)ated horse anti-mouse lgG (H + L; rat adsorbed; BA-200 I)
`Purified mouse lgM, K from TEPC tumour line (M-2770)
`Affinity-purified rabbit anti-CG RP PAbs
`Strept.avidin-biotinylated horseradish peroxidase complex (RPN I 051)
`Fluorescein-streptavidin (RPN 1232)
`Vcctastain® £lite Aac kit
`3,3' Oiaminobenzidine (DAB)
`Hydrogen peroxide solution 30%
`Paraformaldehyde
`Xylene
`DEPEX mounting medium2
`Propidium iodide
`CitiFluor aqueous mountant
`Triton-X 100 (10% stock in PBS)
`
`Supplier
`
`Vector Laboratories,
`Peterborough
`
`European Collection of
`Animal Cell Cultures,
`Porton Down
`
`Vector
`
`Sigma
`
`C. Plumpton
`Amcrsham
`
`Amersham
`Vector
`
`Amersham
`BDH
`BDTI
`
`B011
`
`BDll
`
`Molecular Probes
`City University, London
`Sigma
`
`2DEPEX is named for its components, 10 g distrcne 80, 5 ml dibutyl phthalate, and 35 ml ofxylene
`
`137
`
`

`

`Reagen ls
`0.2 M Phosphate buffer
`Solution A:
`31.2 g sodium di hydrogen orthophosphate in I 000 m Is of deionized H20.
`Solution B:
`28.3 g disodium hydrogen orthophosphate in IOOO mis of deionized T120.
`9.5 ml of A+ 405 ml of B, made up to 500 ml with deionized H20,
`
`4% Paraformaldehyde
`Paraforma1dehyde
`
`80 g
`
`Deionized H20
`500ml
`(Heated witl1 stirring to 60°C, held for 5 minutes, and I M NaOH added dropwisc to clear solution.)
`The above solution was cooled and added to 500 ml 0.2 M phosphate buffer. The pH of the solution
`was adjusted to 7.4 with HCI.
`
`Peroxidase st1bstrate so/111/on (prepared just prior to use)
`DAB
`25 mg
`Hydrogen peroxide (30%; I 00 volumes)
`0.1 M PBS/0.3% Triton-X I 00 (PBSTx)
`
`16 µI Gust prior lo use)
`JOO ml
`
`Vectastain® Elite ABC reagent
`Reagem A
`2 drops (from bottle supplied)
`Reagent B
`2 drops
`0.1 M PBS pH 7.4
`5ml
`The solution was mixed immediately and allowed to stand for 30 minutes prior to use.
`
`Gelatin-subbing of slides
`Glass slides were immersed in Decon detergent solution overnight, rinsed and dried in an oven. Six
`grams of gelatin was dissolved in 1200 ml deionized water by stirring and heat. When dissolved, 0.6 g
`of chromic potassium sulphate was added and slides immersed in this solution for 5 minutes. Slides
`were then dried in an oven.
`
`6.2.3.2. Transcardiac perfusion fixation
`
`Fixation protocols must (1) prevent antigen leakage, (2) permeabilize the cell to allow
`access of the antibody, (3) keep the antigen in such a form that it can be recognized
`efficiently by the antibody, and (4) maintain the cell structure. Transcardiac perfusion
`is the method of choice for the preservation of central nervous system tissue. It aids
`fixation by allowing excellent and quick penetration of fixative and thus prevents a
`number of artefacts associated with the far slower immersion fixation of tissues.
`Paraformaldehyde is a cross-linking reagent which form intermolecular bridges,
`
`138
`
`

`

`,
`
`normally through free amino groups, thus creating a network of linked antigens.
`However, such fixation may denature protein antigens.
`
`6.2.3.2.1. Experimental procedllres
`
`Each Sprague-Dawley rat was deeply anaesthetized by i.p. injection of pentobarbitone
`sodium (Rhone-Merieux). The chest cavity was opened to expose the heart. The
`descending aorta was clamped and the perfusion needle inserted at the apex of the
`heart into the left ventricle. Once the needle was inserted, the right atrium was cut to
`allow irrigation of the upper vasculature of the animal. The rat was perfused with
`0.9% saline containing 2S units/ml heparin al 100 mmHg pressure (approximately
`circulation pressure) until the fluid leaving the atrium appeared clear (approximately
`300 ml). This was followed by perfusion with freshly prepared 4% paraformaldchyde
`in 0.1 M PBS pH 7.4 until the upper body of the animal appeared pale and was rigid
`(approximately 700 ml). The entire spinal column was then dissected and immersed in
`4% parafonnaldehyde at 4°C overnight. The spinal cord was removed the next day
`and immersed overnight in 30% sucrose in 0.1 M PBS pH 7.4 at 4°C.
`
`6.2.3.3. Snap freezing of tissues
`
`rt is important that tissue is frozen rapidly to prevent the formatjon of ice crystals
`(from water within the tissue) which will damage the tissue. Tissues were snap-frozen
`in isopentaoe at -35 to -40°C. This was achieved by cooling a beaker of isopentaoc on
`dry ice and monitoring the temperature of isopentane with a temperature probe. At
`this temperature, the white and grey matter of tissues from the central nervous system
`freeze at the same rate, thus minimizing any cracking of' tissue. Frozen tissue were
`used fresh or stored at -70°C
`
`6.2.3.4. Cryostat sections
`
`In experiments involving the use of free-floating sections, 30 µm sections were cut
`from the rat spinal cord (L4-L5) at -20°C using a 2800 Frigocut E cryostat (Reichert(cid:173)
`Jung) or a Bright OTF/AS cryostat (Bright Instrument, Huntingdon). Sections were
`immediately immersed in 0.1 M PBS/0.3% Triton-X 100 (PBSTx) in permeable
`plastic capsules (Agar Scientific Ltd., Stansted) placed within the wells of a 24-well
`tissue culture plate (CoStar). Two spinal cord sections were placed into each well.
`
`139
`
`

`

`6.2.3.5. Immunocytochemical staining of free-floating tissue sections
`6.2.3.5.1. Optimization of staining procedure
`
`The immunostaining procedures described below were optimized by systematically
`investigating the effect of several experimental variables on the staining of adjacent
`tissue sections. The optima] concentration of primary antibody was determined by
`dilution studies. Two secondary antibodies were compared: biotinylated anti-mouse K
`light chain MAb 187.1 and the Vector biotinylated horse rat-absorbed anti-mouse (gG
`which exhibits cross-reactivity with mouse IgM. Streptavidin-biotinylatcd horseradish
`peroxidase complex from Amersharn (diluted I in 200 with PBSTx) and the
`Vcctastain® Elite ABC reagent were compared. The concentration of DAB was
`compared at 0.025% and 0.05%.
`
`6.2.3.5.2. Experime11tal procedures
`
`All procedures were carried out at room temperature with the exception of overnight
`incubation with primary antibody at 4°C. fncubation and washing steps were
`performed with gentle shaking of the tissue culture plate on an orbital tray shaker. Tbe
`washing step consisted of reagent removal followed by 3 incubations with 300 µl
`fresh PBSTx over 5 minute intervals.
`PBSTx was removed from wells containing free-floating sections by the use of
`a Pasteur pipette attached to a vacuum. Four hundred µl of 0. t M PBS containing
`normal horse serum 3%, 0.1% BSA and 0.3% Triton-X 100 (blocking reagent) was
`added to each well. Tissue sections were incubated with blocking reagent for 1 hour.
`After removal of the blocking reagent, tissue sections were incubated overnight at 4°C
`with 300 µl of primary antibody appropriately diluted in blocking reagent (15 to
`60 µg/ml for Id MAbs). RCG MAb supcmatants were tested undiluted. Tissue
`sections were washed and incubated for 90 minutes with 300 µI of biotinylated
`secondary anti-mouse antibody at a dilution of 1 in 200 (in PBSTx). This was
`followed by washing and incubation for 60 minutes with 300µ1 of Vectastain® Elite
`ABC reagent. Alter washing, 300 µl substrate solution (DAB solution 0.025%
`containing 0.005% hydrogen peroxide in PBSTx) was added and the development of
`colour monitored under a microscope (Wild Hcerbrugg; Leitz Instruments Ltd.). The
`reaction was stopped by washing twice in deionized water.
`Tissue sections were mounted on glass slides (non-gelatinized; Chance
`Propper Ltd., Smethwick, Warley) with the aid of a brush and allowed to air dry.
`Slides were sequentially immersed in 70% ethanol (5 minutes), absolute ethanol (5
`minutes), and finally in xylene (5 minutes). Coverslips (Chance Propper Ltd) were
`mounted with the non-aqueous mounting medium DEPEX.
`
`140
`
`

`

`6.2.3.5.3. Experimental co11tro/s
`
`Method specificity was detennined by the use of omission controls. Primary antibody,
`biotinylatcd secondary antibody, streptavidin-biotinylated horseradish peroxidase
`complex and DAB were omitted in control tissue sections in order to identify the
`source of potential non-specificity.
`Antibody specificity was investigated by the use of a non-specific mouse lgM
`as a control antibody and testing whether pre-absorption with antigen could diminish
`immunostaining. Having dctennincd the lowest concentration of primary antibody
`compatible with good immunostaining, Id MAbs were pre-absorbed with affinity(cid:173)
`purified rabbit anti-CORP PAbs (10 to 50 times excess molar concentration)
`overnight prior to use in immunostainiog of tissue sections.
`The most relevant question in U1e present study was whether immunostaining
`with Id MAbs could be attributable to CORP receptor localization. CORP itself
`should inhibit immunostaining if CORP receptors were localized by ld MAbs.
`Therefore, tissue sections were pre-incubated with excess Ra.CORP (10 µM) in
`binding assay buffer or binding assay buffer alone, blocked with normal horse serum
`(blocking reagent above), followed by overnight co-incubation of Id MAbs with
`10 ~tM Ra.CGRP.
`
`6.2.3.6. Immunocytochemistry using fresh (unfixed) tissue sections
`
`The immunostaining of fresh, unfixed, spinal sections was tested because of the
`possibility
`that paraformaldehyde fixation denatures
`the CORP receptor. If
`immunostaining of fresh tissue sections was possible, it would allow testing of the
`specificity ofld MAbs for the CORP receptor by displacement with excess CGRP.
`The immunocytocbemicaJ procedure used was similar to that described above
`for fixed tissue sections. However, tissue sections were mounted on slides and thinner
`14 µm sections were used to facilitate antibody penetration. In addition, Triton-X I 00
`was avoided in all steps.
`
`6.2.3.7. Immunocytochemistry of cultured cells
`
`Immunostaining of live and fixed cells was attempted in order to answer the major
`question of whether ld and RCO MAbs specifically localize the CORP receptor.
`Specificity could be assessed by studying cells previously shown by receptor binding
`stuclies to be positive or negative for CORP receptors. Immunostaining live cells
`would avoid the potential denaturing effect of paraformaldehyde fixation and allow
`the performance of displacement stuilies with CORP. In addition, higher resolution
`
`141
`
`

`

`may be obtained and 3-dimensional views obtained by confocal fluorescence
`microscopy could identify whether a membrane protein is immunostained (e.g., see
`Ornatowska & Glascl, 1992).
`The SK-N-MC human cell line clearly expresses CORP receptors, as shown in
`the present study and by others (Semark et al., 1992). However, specific CGRP
`binding could not be demonstrated in a related cell line, SK-N-SH. This cell line was
`therefore used as a negative control. A major interest was to use anti-receptor MAbs
`as pharmacological tools in the rat. Therefore, the rat. L6 myocyte cell line which
`expresses high affinity CGRP receptors was investigated. Specific binding of CGRP
`to intact 16 myoeytes has been demonstrated (Poyner el al., 1992). The AR42J rat
`exocrine pancreas cell line which does not express CGRP receptors (Poyner el al.,
`1992) was used as a negative control.
`
`6.2.3. 7.1. Cell culture
`
`SK-N-MC (ATCC No. HTB 10) and SK-N-SH (ATCC No. HTB 11) human
`neuroblastoma cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. L6 rat
`thigh muscle cells (ECACC No. 85011421) and AR42J rat exocrine pancreas ceJls
`(ATCC No. CRL 1492) were obtained from the European Collection of Animal Cell
`Cultures and Flow Laboratories respectively. Cells were cultured in media specified
`by the suppliers and grown to about 80% confluence for immunostaining.
`
`6.2.3. 7.2. Coati11g of coverslips wit/, Poly-L./ysi11e
`
`Cells were grown on poly-L-lysine coated covcrslips within wells of 12-well tissue
`culture plates for the purpose of immunostaining. Poly-L-lysine binds to most solid
`supports through its charged side chains. The positively charged polymer provides a
`site for binding of cells (which carry a overall negative charge). Although this cross(cid:173)
`link is not covalent, it is sufficiently strong for most cell staining techniques.
`The following procedures were performed in a laminar flow cabinet. Poly-L(cid:173)
`lysine (Sigma) was dissolved in sterile water to 5 µg/ml. Coverslips (18 mm diameter)
`were placed into wells of a 12-well tissue culture plate. One ml poly-L-lysine was
`added to each well. After an incubation period of 30 minutes, the solution was
`aspirated and coverslips washed with I ml sterile water. The eoverslips were allowed
`to dry before the seeding of cells.
`
`142
`
`

`

`6.2.3. 7.3 Experimental procedures
`
`The immunostaining procedures were performed in 12-well tissue culture plates at
`room temperature. Except for the final wash, each washing step consisted of reagent
`removaJ followed by 3 incubations with fresh 0.1 M PBS over 5 minute intervals.
`Cells were removed from the incubator, washed in DMEM medium (with
`25 mM HEPES and 4.5 g glucose but without pyruvate [Gibco]) for 5 minutes,
`followed by incubation in the same medium containing 3% normal horse serum
`(blocking reagent) for 60 minutes. The blocking reagent was removed and cells
`incubated with Id MAbs diluted in blocking reagent (15 to 60 µg/ml) for 60 minutes.
`RCG MAb supernatants were tested undiluted. A control without primary antibody
`was included. After washing, cells were incubated with biotinylated anti-mouse
`secondary antibody (Vector) diluted 1 in 200 in 0.1 M PBS for 60 minutes. The cells
`were washed and incubated for 60 minutes with fluorescein-streptavidin diluted I in
`200 with 0.1 M PBS. After a final wash in PBSTx, cells were incubated with the
`nuclear counterstain propidium iodide (t mg/ml stock; diluted l in 5000 with PBSTx)
`for 30 seconds. A small drop of aqueous mountant (Citifluor) was added to glass
`slides for the mounting of coverslips. A coverslip with adhered cells was gently
`apposed to the aqueous mountant on a glass slide and allowed to dry for a short
`period. Finally, the coverslip was sealed and fixed in position with clear nail varnish.
`lmmunostaining of fixed cells was also performed. Fixation was performed by
`washing cells with 0.1 M PBS followed by incubation with 4% paraformaldehyde in
`0.1 M PBS for 10 minutes. After washing, the same procedures described above were
`followed.
`Jmmunoperoxidase staining using the same procedures described for tissue
`sections was also attempted.
`
`6.2.3.8. Microscopy and Photography
`
`Tissue sections were viewed under a transmitted light microscope (Leitz Dialux
`20EB, Germany). Photography was perfonned a Wild Photoautomat MPS 51S/45
`camera at-tached to the microscope. A rare earth dydidium filter was placed over the
`1 ight source and the light condenser was used except in lowest power. EPT-160T
`(Kodak Ektachrome; 160ASA, tungsten) slide film was used.
`For immunofluorescence experiments, a drop of immersion oil was placed on
`top of the coverslip and the slide viewed under a fluorescence microscope (Leitz;
`Filter I; the wavelength for maximal excitation of fluoresccin is 495 run).
`
`143
`
`

`

`6.2.3.9, Image Analysis
`
`Image analysis of Id MAb immunostained sections was performed to assess whether
`the intensity of cell staining corresponded to the expected distribution of receptors as
`assessed by receptor autoradiography.
`The MCID image analysis system (Microcomputer Imagi11g Device; Imaging
`Research Inc., Brock University, Ontario, Canada) was used. The system consisted of
`a PC-compatible computer running under the OS/2 operating system, an imaging
`system and software. A Compaq

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket