throbber
From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Attachments:
`
`Deborah Sterling <DSTERLING@sternekessler.com>
`Thursday, November 21, 2019 8:54 PM
`Precedential_Opinion_Panel_Request
`Trials; 'william.raich@finnegan.com'; 'erin.sommers@finnegan.com';
`'yieyie.yang@finnegan.com'; 'john.williamson@finnegan.com';
`'pier.deroo@finnegan.com'; 'stewart_mark@lilly.com'; 'jivraj_sanjay@lilly.com'; Bob
`Millonig; Gaby Longsworth; Olga A. Partington; Dennies Varughese; Jeremiah B.
`Frueauf
`Recommendation for POP Review
`IPR2018-01712 Request for Rehearing.pdf; IPR2018-01711 Request for Rehearing.pdf;
`IPR2018-01710 Request for Rehearing.pdf; IPR2018-01427 Request for Rehearing.pdf;
`IPR2018-01426 Request for Rehearing.pdf; IPR2018-01425 Request for Rehearing.pdf;
`IPR2018-01424 Request for Rehearing.pdf; IPR2018-01423 Request for Rehearing.pdf;
`IPR2018-01422 Request for Rehearing.pdf
`
`To the Precedential Opinion Panel of the Board,
`
`Patent Owner respectfully recommends that the Precedential Opinion Panel review the attached Requests for Rehearing 
`under 37 C.F.R. 41.71(d) filed today, November 21, 2019, in proceeding numbers IPR2018‐01422, ‐01423, ‐01424, ‐
`01425, ‐01426, and ‐01427 and IPR2018‐01710, ‐01711, and ‐01712. These Requests for Rehearing are being filed within 
`14 days from the panel’s denial of authorization for supplemental briefing addressing Arthrex and denial of authorization 
`to file a motion for stay, issued by email from the Board on November 15, 2019. Counsel for Petitioners are recipients to 
`this email, a courtesy copy of which is also being sent to Trials@uspto.gov.
`
`Statement of Counsel
`
`Based on my professional judgment, I believe the Board panel decision is contrary to the following constitutional 
`provision, statute, or regulation: Appointments Clause, U.S. Const., art. II, section 2, cl. 2; Fed. R. App. P. 41(c); 5 U.S.C. § 
`551 et seq.
`
`Based on my professional judgment, I believe this case also requires an answer to one or more precedent‐setting 
`questions of exceptional importance:
`
`1. The Board’s response to, and implementation of, Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., — F.3d —, 2019 WL
`5616010 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 31, 2019), in pending cases concerns “major policy [and] procedural issues” for which “it
`is appropriate to create . . . binding agency authority through adjudication before the Board.”  SOP 2 at 3.
`
`2. Whether the Appointments Clause violation has been fixed prior to the mandate issuing in Arthrex, and whether
`decisions made in pending cases by APJs whose appointments violated the constitution must be vacated.  SOP at
`4.
`
`Reasons for Recommending Precedential Opinion Panel Review
`
`Arthrex held that Administrative Patent Judges have not been properly appointed, in violation of the Appointments 
`Clause, and struck down their removal protections to remedy that constitutional violation.  But the mandate in Arthrex 
`has not issued, and until it does the Arthrex remedy is not effective and Administrative Patent Judges will not be 
`removable at‐will. Pressing forward with a hearing and decision in this IPR before the mandate issues would repeat the 
`constitutional violation Arthrex identified. That would be a tremendous waste of resources by the Board and the parties.
`IPR2018-01422-01427, -01710-01712
`Ex. 3002
`
`1
`
`

`

`Patent Owner sought to raise these issues in supplemental briefing, in which it could explain the impact of Arthrex and 
`the constitutional violation that would occur from proceeding with this case, and requested authorization to move for a 
`stay. The Board by email denied Patent Owner authorization to file such briefing or a motion to stay without providing 
`Patent Owner with an opportunity to be heard in a conference call to discuss these issues.   
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`Deborah Sterling
`(Lead Counsel for Patent Owner)
`
`Deborah Sterling, Ph.D.
`Director
`Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20005
`
`Email: dsterling@sternekessler.com
`Direct: 202.772.8501
`
`IP Assistant: Katherine Valencia
`Direct: 202.772.8937 Main: 202.371.2600
`
`
`
`Notice: The information in this electronic transmission (including any attachments) may contain
`confidential or legally privileged information and is intended solely for the individual(s) or entity(ies)
`named above. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized agent, you are hereby notified
`that reading, distributing, or otherwise disseminating or copying, or taking any action based on the
`contents of this transmission is strictly prohibited. Any unauthorized interception of this transmission
`is illegal under the law. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the
`sender by return email and then destroy all copies of the transmission.
`
`2
`
`IPR2018-01422-01427, -01710-01712
`Ex. 3002
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket