throbber
[CANCER RESEARCH 64, 5720 -5727, August 15, 2004]
`
`Heparin- Binding EGF -Like Growth Factor Is a Promising Target for Ovarian
`Cancer Therapy
`
`Shingo Miyamoto,1 Michinari Hirata,2 Ayano Yamazaki,2 Takuya Kageyama,2 Hidetoshi Hasuwa,3
`Hiroto Mizushima,2 Yoshihiro Tanaka,1 Hiroshi Yagi,1 Kenzo Sonoda,1 Masahiro Kai,4 Hideo Kanoh,4
`Hitoo Nakano,1 and Eisuke Mekada"
`'Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan; 2Department of Cell Biology, Research Institute for
`Microbial Diseases and 'Department of Experimental Genome Research, Genome Information Research Center, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan; and 'Department of
`Biochemistry, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Ovarian cancer is the most frequent cause of cancer death among all
`gynecologic cancers. We demonstrate here that lysophosphatidic acid
`(LPA)- induced ectodomain shedding of heparin- binding EGF -like growth
`factor (HB -EGF) is a critical to tumor formation in ovarian cancer. We
`found that among the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family of
`growth factors, HB -EGF gene expression in cancerous tissues and HB-
`EGF protein levels in patients' ascites fluid were significantly elevated.
`The human ovarian cancer cell lines SKOV3 and RMG -1 form tumors in
`nude mice. Tumor formation of these cells was enhanced by exogenous
`expression of pro -HB -EGF and completely blocked by pro -HB -EGF gene
`RNA interference or by CRM197, a specific HB -EGF inhibitor. Trans -
`fection with mutant forms of HB -EGF indicated that the release of soluble
`HB -EGF is essential for tumor formation. LPA, which is constitutively
`produced by ovarian cancer cells, induced HB -EGF ectodomain shedding
`in SKOV3 and RMG -1 cells, resulting in the transactivation of EGFR and
`the downstream kinase extracellular signal -regulated kinase/mitogen-
`activated protein kinase. LPA- induced transactivation was abrogated by
`HB -EGF gene RNA interference or by CRM197. Introduction of lipid
`phosphate phosphohydrolase, which hydrolyzes LPA, decreased the con-
`stitutive shedding of HB -EGF, EGFR transactivation, and the tumori-
`genic potential of SKOV3 and RMG -1 cells. These results indicate that
`HB -EGF is the primary member of the EGFR family of growth factors
`expressed in ovarian cancer and that LPA- induced ectodomain shedding
`of this growth factor is a critical step in tumor formation, making HB-
`EGF a novel therapeutic target for ovarian cancer.
`
`confirmed that EGFR overexpression is significantly associated with
`a high risk of progression in ovarian cancer patients (4). Although the
`frequency of ErbB2 overexpression is low, it has been correlated with
`clinical outcome (2, 3). Seven ligands have been described for EGFR:
`EGF; transforming growth factor (TGF) a; heparin- binding EGF -like
`growth factor (HB -EGF); amphiregulin; betacellulin; epiregulin; and
`epigen. Although a significant correlation between EGFR activation
`and ovarian cancer progression has been documented, which EGFR
`ligands contribute to cancer progression is largely unknown. The
`expression of TGF -a and amphiregulin was described in ovarian
`carcinomas, although expression levels varied in tumors (5, 6). Pro -
`HB -EGF is also expressed in ovarian cancer cells, because ovarian
`cancer cells are sensitive to diphtheria toxin (DT) (7), and DT utilizes
`pro -HB -EGF as the DT receptor (8). However, no comprehensive
`studies examining the significance of EGFR ligands in ovarian cancer
`progression have been reported.
`HB -EGF is initially synthesized as a membrane -bound precursor
`(pro -HB -EGF; Ref. 9). The soluble form of HB -EGF (sHB -EGF) is
`released from the cell membrane by ectodomain shedding of pro -HB-
`EGF (10), in a manner similar to that for other EGFR ligands (11).
`Ectodotnain shedding of pro -HB -EGF is critical for growth factor
`activity, and unregulated release of sHB -EGF results in lethal severe
`hyperplasia in mice (12). A number of physiological and pharmaco-
`logical stimuli, which include G protein -coupled receptor (GPCR)
`ligands such as lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), induce ectodomain
`shedding of pro -HB -EGF (13 -15), indicating that overabundance of
`such stimuli may cause excess release of sHB -EGF.
`Ascites from ovarian cancer patients are considered to be a rich
`source of growth factor activity for ovarian cancer cells. The mole-
`cules involved in this process have been termed ovarian cancer
`activating factors (16). Recent biochemical analysis has revealed that
`LPA is one possible ovarian cancer activating factor candidate (17,
`18). LPA is a simple phospholipid with numerous cellular effects
`including growth promotion, cell cycle progression, and cytoskeletal
`organization (19 -21). LPA levels are markedly elevated in the plasma
`and ascites of patients with ovarian cancer (22). LPA signals are
`generally mediated by LPA receptors, members of the GPCR family.
`Recent studies indicated that LPA and other GPCR ligands induce
`proteolytic cleavage of the extracellular domain (ectodomain shed-
`ding) of EGFR ligands at the cell surface (14, 15). The secreted EGF
`family ligands then activate EGFR on ligation (14, 23). Thus, LPA
`signals and the EGFR system are thought to be closely connected.
`To search for novel effective therapeutic targets, in this work we
`studied the expression of EGFR ligands in ovarian cancer patients and
`found HB -EGF to be the primary EGFR ligand altered in ovarian
`cancer. Based on this evidence, we examined the role of HB -EGF in
`tumor formation of ovarian cancer cells in nude mice. Results showed
`that HB -EGF, especially in its soluble form, is essential for tumor
`growth of ovarian cancer cells in nude mice; therefore, inhibition of
`gene expression or inhibition of growth factor activity can block
`tumor growth. We also show evidence that LPA, which is produced
`Lilly Exhibit 1269
`5720
`Eli Lilly & Co. v. Teva
`Pharms. Int' 1 GMBH
`Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on July 18, 2019. © 2004 American Association for Cancer
`Research.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Ovarian cancer is the most frequent cause of cancer death among all
`gynecologic cancers, and therapies over the last 30 years have not
`improved cure rates (1). To develop a novel effective therapy for
`ovarian cancer, further understanding of the processes and molecules
`leading to the initiation and progression of ovarian cancer is required.
`Activation of the ErbB family of receptors is involved in the
`progression of various cancers; therefore, epidermal growth factor
`receptor (EGFR) and ErbB2 are recognized as effective targets for the
`therapy of various cancers (2, 3). In the case of ovarian carcinoma,
`impairments of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) system, including
`EGFR ligands and ErbB family receptors, have also been reported to
`be involved in autonomous proliferation of ovarian carcinoma cells.
`As described in the literature (2, 3), EGFR overexpression occurs in
`35 -70% of all primary ovarian cancers. Statistical analyses have
`
`Received 3/5/04; revised 6/14/04; accepted 6/21/04.
`Grant support: Grant -in -Aid 14032202 from the Ministry of Education, Culture,
`Sports, Science and Technology (to E. Mekada).
`The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page
`charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with
`18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`Note: Supplementary data for this article can be found at Cancer Research Online
`( http : / /cancerres.aacrjournals.org).
`Requests for reprints: Eisuke Mckada, Department of Cell Biology, Research Insti-
`tute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, 3 -1 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565 -0871,
`Japan. Phone: 81 -6 -6879 -8286; Fax: 81 -6- 6879 -8289; E -mail: emekada®biken.osaka-
`u.ac.jp.
`
`

`

`HB -EGF IS A TARGET FOR OVARIAN CANCER THERAPY
`
`by ovarian cancer cells, causes enhanced ectodomain shedding of
`pro -HB -EGF and consequent tumor formation.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`7.2) [1 mg /week] was injected intraperitoneally into tumor- bearing mice each
`week. All experimental use of animals complied with the guidelines of Animal
`Care of Kyushu University.
`Reverse Transcription -PCR. For the cell lines used in this study, total
`cellular RNA was purified. First -strand cDNA synthesis was performed as
`described previously (30). PCR analysis for the expression of EGFR ligands
`and glyceraldehyde -3- phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as an internal con-
`trol was performed using the primers described (31). For real -time PCR
`analysis, total cellular RNA was purified from frozen tumor tissues; first- strand
`cDNA synthesis was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol.
`Primers specific for HB -EGF (5'- CTCCCTCCTGCATCTGCCACCC -3'),
`TGF -a ( 5'- CCAGCATGTGTCTGCCATTCTGGG -3'), amphiregulin (5' -TCA-
`GAGTTGAACAGGTAGTTAAGCCCCC-3'), and GAPDH (5'- CCGACTCT-
`TGCCCTTCGAAC-3') were labeled with 6- carboxyfluorescein fluorescent
`spectrum as a reporter. The amplification primer pairs were 5'- TGGAGAAT-
`GCAAATATGTGAAGGA-3' and 5'- AGGATGGTTGTGTGGTCATAGG -
`TAT-3' for HB -EGF, 5'- GATTCCCACACTCAGTTCTGCTT -3' and 5' -CAC-
`AGCGTGCACCAACGT-3' for TGF -a, 5'- CCTGGCTATATTGTCGATGAT -
`TCA-3' and 5'- GTATTTTCACTTTCCGTCTTG 1-1"1-í'G -3' for amphiregulin,
`and 5'- GAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTC -3' and 5'-CTTTAGGGTAGTGGTA-
`GAAG-3' for GAPDH. PCR reactions were carried out using the ABI Prism 7700
`Sequence Detection System (Perkin -Elmer Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).
`The expression index for each messenger RNA was defined as the EGFR ligand
`messenger RNA copy number /GAPDH messenger RNA copy number X 104.
`Assay of Cell Surface Activities Hydrolyzing LPA of LPP -Transfected
`SKOV3 Cells. Radiolabeled LPA was prepared by Escherichia coli diacyl-
`glycerol kinase- catalyzed phosphorylation of monoolein (Sigma- Aldrich, St.
`Louis, MO) as described previously (25, 32). Cells (3 x 105 cells /well in a
`12 -well culture plate) were starved for 24 h in RPMI 1640 containing 0.1%
`bovine serum albumin. The cells were then incubated for 10 min at 37 °C in
`medium containing 3% bovine serum albumin and radioactive LPA (20 µM;
`specific radioactivity, ^-7000 cpm /nmol; Ref. 33). The culture medium was
`then rapidly aspirated, and the cells were washed once with 0.5 ml of Tris-
`buffered saline. The inorganic phosphate liberated was extracted from the
`aliquots (250 pl) of the combined medium as described previously (25, 32).
`The Amount of EGFR Ligands in Ascitic Fluid. The quantity of HB-
`EGF in patient ascites fluids was determined by 125I -DT binding. One milliliter
`of ascites fluid was incubated with 20 pi of heparin -Sepharose CL -6B (Am-
`ersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) for 5 h at 4 °C. Gels were washed in
`phosphate- buffered saline, incubated with 125I-DT (100 ng/ml) in the presence
`or absence of excess unlabeled DT for 12 h at 4 °C, and then washed with
`phosphate- buffered saline containing 1 mg /ml bovine serum albumin. The
`radioactivity bound to the gels was then counted in a gamma counter; the
`specific binding of 125I-DT was determined. The amount of HB -EGF was
`determined by normalization to a standard curve obtained by assessment of
`recombinant HB -EGF. The amounts of TGF -a and amphiregulin were deter-
`mined by enzyme -linked immunosorbent assay systems provided by R &D
`Systems, Inc. (Minneapolis, MN), and TECHNE Corp. (Minneapolis, MN),
`respectively. The sensitivity of these assays was <2.2 pg/ml for TGF -a and
`<5 pg /ml for amphiregulin.
`Patients and Statistical Analysis. All of the patients examined had un-
`dergone surgery between 1997 and September 2002 at the Department of
`Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyushu University Hospital. All tissue samples
`were obtained at surgery from 34 patients with stage III /IV ovarian cancer
`derived from coelomic epithelium and 10 patients with normal ovaries who
`had surgery for benign disease or other gynecologic cancer. Ascitic fluid was
`also obtained from a total of 37 patients with normal ovaries (n = 10), benign
`ovarian cysts (n = 10), and stage III /IV ovarian cancers (n = 17). In this study,
`informed consent was obtained from all patients. The values for each EGFR
`ligand were analyzed using the Mann -Whitney U test. P < 0.05 was consid-
`ered statistically significant.
`
`Reagents and Antibodies. DT and CRM197 were prepared as described
`previously (24). To administer CRM197 to mice, LPS -like materials contam-
`inating the CRM197 preparations were removed using Detoxi Gel (Pierce
`Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). LPA 18:1 (1- oleoyl -sn- glycerol -3- phosphate,
`sodium salt) and LPA 18:0 (1- stearoyl -sn- glycerol -3- phosphate, sodium salt)
`were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc. (Alabaster, AL). Suramin,
`GM6001, PD98059, and PD153035 were obtained from Calbiochem (San
`Diego, CA). Polyclonal rabbit anti -EGFR and anti -mitogen- activated protein
`kinase (MAPK) antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology
`(Santa Cruz, CA). Mouse monoclonal antibodies against phospho- tyrosine and
`phospho -MAPK were acquired from Upstate Biotechnology Inc. (Lake Placid,
`NY). Sheep antimouse IgG was obtained from Amersham Corp. (Arlington
`Heights, IL). Peroxidase- conjugated goat antirabbit IgG was purchased from
`Zymed (San Francisco, CA).
`Cell Culture. SKOV3, RMG -1, OVMG1, and the transfected cells were
`maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 100 units /ml penicillin G, 100
`µg /ml streptomycin, and 10% fetal bovine serum (ICN Biomedical, Irvine,
`CA).
`Plasmid Constructions and Transfection. Constructions of plasmids en-
`coding human pro -HB -EGF cDNA, the uc mutant, and the ATM mutant (12)
`inserted into the eukaryotic expression vector pRc /CMV (Invitrogen, Carlsbad,
`CA) have been described previously. Plasmids encoding FLAG -tagged lipid
`phosphate phosphohydrolase (LPP) -1 and FLAG -tagged LPP -3 were gener-
`ated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using human LPP -1 and LPP -3
`complete cDNA (25) as templates. These fragments were then inserted into the
`BamHI -Notl sites of pCX4pur vector. To construct the HB -EGF small inter-
`fering RNA (siRNA) vector (pH l- PUR/siRNAHB -EGF), we synthesized the
`following DNA oligonucleotides: 5'- CCCGTCCGTGACTTGCAAGAGGT -
`TCAAGAGACCTCTTGCAAGTCACGGACTTTTTGGAAA and 5' -CTA-
`GTTTCCAAAAAGTCCGTGACTTGCAAGAGGTCTCTTGAACCTC-
`TTGCAAGTCACGGACGGGTGCA. After amplification of the cDNA
`fragments by PCR, the fragments were cloned into the PstI and XbaI site of the
`pH 1 RNA interference vector (26). The product was digested with BamH 1 and
`XhoI and then cloned into a pPUR selection vector (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA)
`to confer puromycin resistance. Transfections of all constructs into SKOV3
`and RMG -1 cells were performed using LipofectAMINE 2000 reagent (In-
`vitrogen), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Transfected cells were
`selected with 400 µg/ml G418 or 5 µg /ml puromycin.
`Assays of Diphtheria Toxin Binding and Protein Tyrosine Phosphoryl-
`ation. To remove extracellular matrix components, cells were detached with
`trypsin -EDTA and then allowed to recover for 30 min in RPMI 1640 with 10%
`fetal bovine serum (27). To assess the effect of each pharmacological agent on
`DT binding, after rinsing with serum -free medium, cells were incubated with
`serum -free medium at 37 °C for 30 min. Cells (1 X 106) were seeded on
`polylysine- coated 6 -cm dishes. Samples were incubated with serum -free RPMI
`1640 at 37 °C for 1 h to assure the complete adherence of cells to
`the
`polylysine- coated dishes. Binding of 1251-labeled DT to cells was measured,
`and values of the specific binding were determined as described previously (8).
`To examine the activation of EGFR and MAPK, cells were treated as described
`above. Cells were rinsed in phosphate- buffered saline containing 1 mm sodium
`orthovanadate and then lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer [1%
`Triton X -100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 150 mm NaCI, 50 mm Tris
`(pH 8.0), 0.2 unit/ml aprotinin, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg /ml pepstatin A, 2 mm
`phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 mm sodium orthovanadate]. Extracts and
`immunoprecipitants were then subjected to SDS -polyacrylamide gel electro-
`phoresis and immunoblotting analysis (28).
`Tumor Growth in Nude Mice. Subconfluent cell cultures were detached
`RESULTS
`from plates with trypsin -EDTA. A total volume of 250 pl containing 5 X 106
`cells suspended in serum -free RPMI 1640 was injected into female BALB /c
`Enhanced Expression of HB -EGF in Human Ovarian Cancer.
`nu/nu mice at 5 weeks of age (Charles River Laboratories). Injection- treated
`In the beginning of this study, we determined the expression levels of
`mice were examined every week for tumor apparition. Tumor volume was
`EGFR ligand genes in ovarian cancer. Among EGFR ligands, the
`calculated as described previously (29). To assess the effect of -CRM197
`expression of HB -EGF, TGF -a, amphiregulin, and epiregulin was
`inhibition, CRM197 dissolved in 1 ml of 20 mm HEPES and 0.15 M NaCI (pH
`5721
`
`Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on July 18, 2019. © 2004 American Association for Cancer
`Research.
`
`

`

`A
`
`HB-EGF
`P<0.01 -I
`
`500 -
`
`400 --
`
`x
`
`Ç 300 -
`1= o
`ái 200 -
`N
`L .
`X w
`100--
`
`tt
`
`OVCA
`(t.34)
`
`0 --..
`
`i
`
`;
`NO
`(t12)
`
`B
`
`HB-EGF
`
`Amphiregulin
`N.S.
`5-
`4-
`
`1
`
`x o
`
`1-
`
`-*-
`
`11.
`
`NO
`(n=12)
`
`...._.........___-i.iI.i`.-__
`OVCA
`(n=34)
`
`Amphiregulin
`
`IIB -EGF IS A TARGET FOR OVARIAN CANCER THERAPY
`
`TGF-a
`N.S.-i
`
`s
`
`NO
`(n=12)
`
`OVCA
`( t34)
`
`TGF-a,
`N.S. ----1
`N.S.-,
`I. N.S. -
`

`
`SO
`
`(pg/ml)
`50-
`
`ú.
`--

`c
`o
`
`.
`
`40-
`
`30-
`
`2 0 -
`
`G
`o
`c 10-
`o
`C)
`
`1
`OVCA
`(n=17)
`
`(pg/ml)
`1000-
`
`rn ï o.
`
`E

`c
`o
`:w.
`CJ
`
`800-
`
`600 °°
`
`400-
`
`c
`o 200-
`C
`o
`Ca
`
`0
`
`:4
`NO
`(rt=10)
`
`(ng /ml)
`5-
`
`4-
`
`3-
`
`2-
`
`1-
`
`o
`
`N.S. -I
`
`: -..-
`
`ii
`ss.
`OC
`OVCA
`OC
`NO
`NO
`(ml 0)
`(n=10)
`(n=17)
`(n=10)
`(n=10)
`Fig. 1. Association of EGFR ligand expression levels with clinical outcome in human ovarian cancer. A, expression index of HB -EGF, TGF -a, and amphiregulin in patients with
`either normal ovaries (NO) or ovarian cancer (OVCA). B, the ascites fluid levels of HB -EGF, TGF -a, and amphiregulin in patients with normal ovaries (NO), ovarian cysts (OC), and
`ovarian cancer (OVCA). Bars indicate mean. NS, not significant.
`
`i
`
`s
`
`s
`..011...
`
`it
`OVCA
`(M17)
`
`-.----
`
`ii
`
`OC
`(n=10)
`
`measured by nonquantitative reverse transcription -PCR (RT -PCR) in
`specimens from patients with ovarian cancer. EGF and betacellulin
`expression were not detected (data not shown). Then, we determined
`the expression levels of these four EGFR ligand genes in a quantita-
`tive manner by real -time PCR using specimens from patients with
`normal ovaries or ovarian cancer. Expression indices of HB -EGF,
`TGF -a, and amphiregulin in patients with normal ovaries or ovarian
`cancer are shown in Fig. IA. The expression level of epiregulin was
`similar to that of TGF -a.5 Large differences between the expression of
`HB -EGF and the other three EGFR ligands were observed in the
`tissue specimens examined. In addition to gene expression, we also
`determined the protein levels of HB -EGF, TGF -a, and amphiregulin
`in ascites fluids (Fig. IB). The amount of epiregulin was not deter-
`mined because appropriate antibodies for enzyme- linked immunosor-
`bent assay were not available. Consistent with the PCR data, the
`amount of HB -EGF in the peritoneal fluid of patients with normal
`ovaries or ovarian cancer was much higher than the amount of TGF -a
`and amphiregulin. Furthermore, and more importantly, HB -EGF gene
`expression levels in tissue specimens and protein levels in ascitic fluid
`from patients with ovarian cancer increased significantly from the
`levels observed in normal and cystic ovary tissues, although such
`enhanced expression was not observed for other EGFR ligands. These
`
`5Y. Tanaka, S. Miyamoto, S. O. Suzuki, E. Oki, H. Yagi, K. Sonoda, A. Yamazaki,
`H. Mizushima, E. Mekada, and H. Nakano. Clinical significance of heparin- binding
`EGF -like growth factor and ADAM 17 expression in human ovarian cancer, manuscript
`in preparation.
`
`results indicated that HB -EGF may play a role in human ovarian
`cancer.
`HB -EGF Is Essential for Tumor Formation of Ovarian Cancer
`Cells. As shown above, HB -EGF was the only EGFR ligand with
`particularly enhanced RNA and protein levels in ovarian cancer. To
`examine whether HB -EGF contributes to tumor formation in human
`ovarian cancer, we studied the relationship between HB -EGF expres-
`sion levels and tumor- forming ability of ovarian cancer cell lines in
`nude mice. SKOV3 and RMG -1 are cell lines derived from human
`epithelial ovarian carcinomas. RT -PCR revealed that HB -EGF is the
`primary EGFR ligand expressed in these cells, although expression of
`TGF -a, amphiregulin, and epiregulin was also detected (Fig. 2, A and
`B). A DT binding assay confirmed the presence of pro -HB -EGF on
`the surface of SKOV3 and RMG -1 cells and indicated that the amount
`of pro -HB -EGF on the surface of RMG -1 cells was about 2.5 -fold
`higher than that on the surface of SKOV3 cells (Fig. 2, C and D).
`injected subcutaneously
`When SKOV3 and RMG -1 cells were
`(5 X 106 cells /mouse) into nude mice, both cells formed tumors (Fig.
`3, A and B). Consistent with HB -EGF expression levels, RMG -1 cells
`formed tumors more rapidly than SKOV3 cells.
`To gain evidence of the involvement of HB -EGF in tumor forma-
`tion, ovarian cancer cells ectopically expressing pro -HB -EGF were
`isolated. SK -HB cells were obtained by transfecting SKOV3 cells
`with wild -type pro -HB -EGF. SK- HB -1 -3, stable clones of SK -HB
`cells, expressed pro -HB -EGF on the cell surface at levels approxi-
`mately 7 -fold higher than that of the parental SKOV3 cells (Fig. 2C).
`5722
`
`Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on July 18, 2019. © 2004 American Association for Cancer
`Research.
`
`

`

`HB -EGF IS A TARGET FOR OVARIAN CANCER THERAPY
`
`s
`
`0 G Q- Q G G
`P 4 4> 4
`
`z s
`
`S I T
`
`A
`
`1353
`1078
`872
`603-
`310
`281
`
`C
`
`á3Q -
`á -
`x20_
`73
`
`m 10-
`t- o
`
``^
`
`o
`
`ß Z
`
`^ n
`4J CO
`0 0
`
`1Z, m mQí
`,kt
`
`ti
`g 1'
`0 0 0
`
`;v0,
`<
`Q
`
`o k k
`
`I,
`
`r HB -EGF
`G3PDH
`
`Fig. 2. Expression of HB -EGF in SKOV3, RMG -I, and transfectant cells and inhibi-
`tion by siRNA. A and B, expression of EGF family ligands in SKOV3 (A) and RMG -1 (B)
`cells was assessed by RT -PCR. The positions of size markers (bp) arc shown in Lanes M.
`C, quantitation of cell surface pro -HB -EGF expressed in SKOV3, SK -HB, and SK -MHB
`cells as measured by the binding of l25í -DT. The values of specific binding represent the
`average i- SD of three independent experiments. D, quantitation of cell surface pro -HB-
`EGF expressed in SKOV3, RMG -1, and HB -EGF siRNA vector -expressing cells as
`measured by the binding of l25í -DT. SKI81 -1, SK181 -2, and SK181 -3 cells, transfectants
`derived from SKOV3 cells, or 8181 -1, 8181 -2, and R181-3 cells, transfectants derived
`from RMG -1 cells, express HB -EGF siRNA. The values of specific binding represent the
`average ± SD of three independent experiments. E, semiquantitative RT -PCR analysis for
`pro -HB -EGF and GAPDH expression from transcripts derived from SKOV3 cells,
`RMG -1 cells, and cells expressing HB -EGF siRNA vector.
`
`weeks after injection, and tumors were slow to develop after this point
`(Fig. 3B). R181 -3, a clone expressing higher levels of HB -EGF than
`the other R181 clones, formed smaller tumors than the parental
`RMG -1 cells over a similar time scale. The small tumor formation of
`R181 -3 cells may be due to the partial reduction of pro -HB -EGF
`expression in R181-3 cells, but we cannot exclude the possibility that
`the introduced siRNA construct was lost from the R181 -3 cells under
`nonselective conditions, and therefore the cells re- formed tumors.
`Expression of empty vector containing only the H1 promoter (26) or
`vector containing an irrelevant DNA fragment did not affect the
`tumorigenicity of either SKOV3 or RMG -1 cells (data not shown).
`These results indicate that expression levels of pro -HB -EGF are
`critical for tumor formation of ovarian cancer cells.
`Suppression of Tumor Growth by Exogenously Administered
`CRM197. To further examine the tumorigenic activity of sHB -EGF,
`we studied the effect of CRM197 on tumor growth. CRM197, a
`nontoxic mutant protein of DT, is a specific inhibitor of sHB -EGF
`(34). One week after subcutaneous injection of either SKOV3 or
`RMG -1 cells, mice were given CRM197 (1 mg/week) every week by
`intraperitoneal injection. Tumor formation was completely suppressed
`by CRM197 treatment (Fig. 4, A and B). Similar results were also
`observed with OVMG1, another ovarian cancer cell line (Ref. 35; Fig.
`40. Furthermore, CRM197 also completely suppressed tumor forma-
`tion from SK -HB -1 (Fig. 4D) and R -HB -1 cells (data not shown),
`even though these cells expressed high levels of surface pro -HB -EGF.
`These results confirm that HB -EGF is required for tumor formation of
`ovarian cancer cell lines in vivo. In comparison, Taxol, a widely used
`chemotherapeutic agent for ovarian cancer, was used for nude mice
`with SKOV3 or SK -HB -1 cell tumors. Taxol inhibited tumor forma-
`tion of SKOV3 cells to a degree similar to that of CRM197 but only
`weakly inhibited tumor formation by SK -HB -1 cells (Fig. 4, E and F).
`Ectodomain Shedding of Pro -HB -EGF Is Essential for Tumor
`Formation. A previous study indicated that ectodomain shedding of
`pro -HB -EGF is critical for growth factor activity (12). To examine the
`
`A
`r""
`E 25
`E
`A 20
`
`15-
`
`a-SKOV3
`0-oSK181-1
`-+SK181-2
`o--uSK181-3
`
`a--nRt
`cR181-1
`o
`__ R181-2
`o-QR181-3
`
`0
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5 6 7 8 910
`(Weeks)
`
`C)
`
`E
`E 251
`o c) 20-
`15
`
`a
`E 10
`ó >

`E o
`
`o--o SK-HB-1
`.--- SK-HB-2
`4--o SK-HB-3
`
`10
`(Weeks)
`
`All SK -HB cell clones formed larger tumors in nude mice than the
`parental SKOV3 cells. Mice that received injection with SK -HB cells
`died within 6 weeks of subcutaneous injection (Fig. 3C). Similar
`results, i.e., enhanced tumorigenicity, were also observed in R -HB
`cells obtained by transfecting RMG -1 cells with wild -type pro -HB-
`EGF (data not shown).
`To confirm the requirement for pro -HB -EGF in tumor formation of
`ovarian cancer cells, pro -HB -EGF expression was suppressed by
`vector -encoded siRNA. A plasmid coexpressing the pro -HB -EGF
`siRNA and a puromycin resistance gene was transfected into either
`SKOV3 or RMG -1 cells. After selection in puromycin- containing
`media, we isolated the surviving colonies. The specific knockdown of
`pro -HB -EGF expression
`isolated clones (referred
`the
`in
`to as
`SK181 -1, SKI81 -2, and SK181 -3 for SKOV3 transfectants and
`R181-1, R181-2, and R181-3 for RMG -1 transfectants) was con-
`firmed by RT -PCR (Fig. 2E). DT binding also revealed reduced levels
`of pro -HB -EGF on the cell surface in these siRNA- expressing cells,
`although the reductions observed were minimal in clone R181 -3 (Fig.
`2D). SKOV3, RMG -1, and the respective transfectants were injected
`subcutaneously (5 x 106 cells /mouse) into nude mice. Whereas
`Fig. 3. Tumor formation of ovarian cancer cells
`in nude mice. SKOV3 cells and
`SKOV3 cells rapidly formed tumors in nude mice, the pro -HB -EGF
`HB -EGF- targeting siRNA- expressing SK -181 cells (A), RMG -1 and HB- EGF -targeting
`knockdown cell clones, SK181 -1, SK181 -2, and SK181 -3, did not
`siRNA- expressing 8181 cells (B), SK -HB cells (C), and SK -MHB and SK -SHB cells (D)
`form tumors until 10 weeks after subcutaneous injection (Fig. 3A).
`were injected subcutaneously into nude mice. Every week, beginning 1 week after
`injection of cells, tumor size at the injection sites was measured. Tumor volume was then
`Similarly, whereas RMG -1 cells developed into tumors more rapidly
`calculated as described in "Materials and Methods." Each tumor volume represents the
`than SKOV3 cells, R181 -1 and R181 -2 did not form tumors until 6
`mean ± SD (n = 10).
`5723
`
`o- oSK-SHB-1
`SK-SHB-2
`n 0SK-SHB-3
`
`o---0SK-MHB-1
`
`-- SK-M H$-2
`
`a- -aSK-MHB-3
`
`0
`
`5 6 7 8 910
`(Weeks)
`
`Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on July 18, 2019. © 2004 American Association for Cancer
`Research.
`
`

`

`SKOV3
`
`o-o CR1.1197(-)
`4,---* CRPd197(+)
`
`&^o
`
`A
`
`E
`
`oc 20
`
`-t<-15
`
`lì
`
`10-
`
`5
`
`0
`
`0
`
`1
`
`2 3 4
`
`5
`
`9 10
`7 8
`(Weeks)
`
`E
`E
`c 20
`xis
`
`10
`
`o
`
`E o
`z

`
`OVMG1
`
`o-o CRPr1197(-)
`--- CRM197(+)
`
`7 8 910
`(Weeks)
`
`r
`
`o
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5 6
`
`25
`
`E
`a
`;220
`X
`
`15
`
`10-
`
`5._
`
`E
`
`ó >
`L
`0
`E
`
`E
`É 2',
`p20 ?
`
`-
`W15
`'
`o
`o
`-6
`
`5-
`
`1IB -EGF IS A TARGET FOR OVARIAN CANCER THERAPY
`
`RMG-1
`
`CRh1197(-)
`-+CRt.1197(+)
`
`o
`
`1
`
`2
`
`4
`
`5 6 7 8 910
`(Weeks)
`
`SK-HB-1
`
`25
`ó 20._
`
`K
`
`15
`
`E
`
`210 ó >
`
`P
`
`F-
`
`a
`
`0
`
`F
`
`25-
`g 2°_
`15-
`
`co
`
`g 10-
`
`}
`.- 5-

`}3 0
`
`o--oCRh1197(-)
`
`.-. C Rra197(+)
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4 5 6 7:
`10
`(Weeks)
`
`SK-HB-1
`
`4 4
`
`a-o Taxo1(-)
`--Taxol(+)
`4 5 6 7 8 Ó
`
`(Weeks)
`
`ovarian cancer cells. In ovarian cancer patients, LPA levels are
`markedly elevated in plasma and ascites (22). In addition, using
`different cell lines, we and others have shown that LPA induces
`ectodomain shedding of pro -HB -EGF (14, 15, 36). Thus, we next
`focused on the contribution of LPA to the ectodomain shedding of
`pro -HB -EGF in ovarian cancer cells.
`We first confirmed whether exogenously added LPA actually in-
`duces pro -HB -EGF ectodomain shedding in ovarian cancer cells.
`SKOV3, RMG -1, and OVMG1 cells were treated with saturated or
`unsaturated LPA, and pro -HB -EGF ectodomain shedding was deter-
`mined. Ectodomain shedding was quantitated by measuring the
`amount of pro -HB -EGF remaining on the cell surface using the DT
`binding assay (8). Addition of LPA with unsaturated fatty acids
`(18:1), but not LPA with saturated fatty acids (18:0), to these ovarian
`cancer cells induced ectodomain shedding of pro -HB -EGF (Supple-
`mentary Fig. 1). The metalloprotease inhibitor GM6001, which inhib-
`its ectodomain shedding of EGFR ligands, blocked LPA- induced
`decreases in pro -HB -EGF surface levels, confirming that the reduc-
`tion resulted from ectodomain shedding.
`LPA- induced pro -HB -EGF ectodomain shedding resulted in trans -
`activation of EGFR and the downstream kinase extracellular signal -
`regulated kinase (ERK) /MAPK. As shown in Fig. 5, A and B, addition
`of LPA 18:1 (unless otherwise specified, LPA 18:1 was used in all of
`the following experiments) enhanced EGFR and ERK/MAPK activa-
`tion, and GM6001 blocked LPA- induced EGFR and ERK/MAPK
`activation. In contrast, the activation of EGFR and ERK/MAPK by
`exogenously added sHB -EGF was not inhibited by GM6001 treat-
`ment. By preventing the binding of EGFR ligands to the EGFR
`extracellular domain, an anti -EGFR antibody, ICR -3R, also blocked
`LPA- induced activation of EGFR and ERK/MAPK. These results
`confirm that LPA- induced activation of EGFR and ERK/MAPK in
`SKOV3 and RMG -1 cells occurred via a ligand- dependent mecha-
`nism. SKOV3 and RMG -1 cells express other EGFR ligands includ-
`ing TGF -a, amphiregulin, and epiregulin at levels lower than that of
`HB -EGF (Fig. 2, A and B). However, inhibition of HB -EGF protein
`by CRM197 or HB -EGF gene expression by siRNA prevented LPA -
`induced transactivation of EGFR and ERK/MAPK (Fig. 5, C and D).
`requirement for pro -HB -EGF ectodomain shedding for tumor forma-
`These results indicate that HB -EGF is the primary EGFR ligand
`contributing to LPA- induced transactivation of EGFR and ERK/
`tion, we prepared SKOV3 cells ectopically expressing mutant forms
`MAPK in ovarian cancer cells.
`of pro -HB -EGF. SK -MHB and SK -SHB cells were obtained by trans -
`Self -Production of LPA in Ovarian Cancer Cells Results in
`fecting SKOV3 cells with an uncleavable pro -HB -EGF mutant (uc)
`Constitutive HB -EGF Shedding and EGFR Activation. LPA is
`and an HB -EGF form with its transmembrane domain deleted (ATM).
`constitutively produced in ovarian cancer cells, including SKOV3 and
`The uc form is resistant to ectodomain shedding resulting from
`RMG -1 (22, 37). This constitutive production of LPA potentially
`induction by various shedding- inducing stimuli, whereas the ATM
`contributes to autonomous induction of pro -HB -EGF shedding. The
`secretes sHB -EGF in the absence of shedding stimuli (12). SK -MHB
`cell clones expressed the uc form of pro -HB -EGF mutants on the cell
`DT binding assay revealed that incubation of SKOV3 cells with
`GM6001 or suramin,

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket