throbber
FirstWor
`
`
`
`|_-"| 1.1K Fl FNAA
`
`Where People Who Know First 60 First.
`
`ViewPoints: Biogen Idec struggling to cope with
`Tecfidera demand suggests analyst
`
`Created 06/12/2013 - 11:11
`
`Following speculation last week that prescription numbers for Biogen Idec's Tecfidera were being artificially
`boosted by some double counting, Sanford C. Bernstein analyst Geoffrey Porges speculated in a note to
`investors on Tuesday that the launch is actually stronger than script numbers indicate.
`
`The reason — Biogen Idec simply cannot cope with demand for the product, which is on track to be the biggest
`new drug launch of 201 3 by a significant margin.
`
`Insight, Analysis & Opinion
`
`Based on a survey of 50 moderate and high prescribing US-based neurologists, Porges suggests that around 50
`percent of patients prescribed Tecfidera are still waiting for benefit verification and are therefore unlikely to be
`reported as filled prescriptions for the drug.
`
`Porges adds that ”most respondents suggest that their initial experience with the drug has matched or exceeded
`their expectations and referrals for treatment are coming from both patient and physician initiated use. Unlike
`prior launches, a larger majority of patients started on Tecfidera are switchers from other therapies (mainly
`inj ectable ABCRs)." Furthermore, Bernstein's survey indicates that drug discontinuation rates for Tecfidera are
`low; 79 percent of respondents report that all patients remain on the drug since launch.
`
`Some may feel that Biogen Idec has underinvested in the launch; logistical delays with regards to patient access
`and reimbursement programmes are worse that those previously experienced with other multiple sclerosis drugs,
`suggest two thirds of respondents, which Porges believes could weigh on short-term performance of the drug.
`
`This may be splitting hairs, given the performance of Tecfidera to date and suggestions that revenues could now
`comfortably exceed $500 million for 2013. Suggestions that Tecfidera demand is higher than script numbers
`indicate should also help to offset recent concerns about double counting and provide a more robust outlook for
`Biogen Idec as it looks to launch Tecfidera in Europe — hopefully with enhanced data protection -
`see ViewPoints: Biogen looks to firm up EU data exclusivity for Tecfidera — delays launch [1].
`
`See also:
`
`Physician Views Poll Results — European launch of Biogen ldec's Tecfidera highly anticipated by
`neurologists [2]
`
`ViewPoints: Data remain early, but Tecfidera "crushing" laimches of other oral MS treatments [3]
`
`Spotlight On: Five key facts about Biogen Idec's Tecfidera [4]
`
`FirstWord Pharma is a reliable news service providing an efficient and timely global overview of the news and
`Biogen Exhibit 2008
`
`Page 1 0f 2
`
`Mylan V. Biogen
`IPR2018-01403
`
`Biogen Exhibit 2069
`Coalition v. Biogen
`IPR2015-01993
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`Biogen Exhibit 2069
`Coalition v. Biogen
`IPR2015-01993
`
`Biogen Exhibit 2008
`Mylan v. Biogen
`IPR2018-01403
`
`

`

`events impacting the pharmaceutical industry.
`
`To access additional articles of interest, please Visit wwwfirstwordpharmacom.
`
`© 2016 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All Rights Reserved.
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket