throbber
EC'FRIMS 20 11
`
`Page 1 01'2
`
`_
`
`I'I'.l'-iome:-:I:.-
`EcreiMs 2019 _
`
`'
`
`- ECTRIMS zine
`
`; saws clinical hi
`' "
`..__2°19.:_
`_IRl-IMS zuir .-
`:EI
`__
`__
`.- normals serum 201
`I sanitizers -
`
`._ Teciidela update
`September. ”2916 '
`
`.'
`
`Screams 2015
`
`_
`
`i attended the ECTRIMS meeting October 19-22, 2011 in Amsterdam. This year there
`were a number of important clinical trials, many of which were Phase iii results from
`drugs which looked very promising in Phase ii.
`
`BG12: The most important results were from a Phase III study of a drug called 3612. This
`is an oral medication, given either 2 or 3 times a day. They did a 96 week study with over
`" .. 1200 subjects in 3 groups. The annual relapse rate on placebo was 0.364, while it was
`
`0.172 on lower close 8612 and 0.189 on the higher dose of 8612. This is a reduction of 53
`
`or 48% in the relapse rate. There was also a marked effect on MRl activity, with a
`red uction of about 90% in enhancing lesions and 85% in new T2 lesions. The main side
`
`ffects were flushing and GI irritation. These are impressive results, both for efficacy and
`, safety.
`in their Phase ll study (see the report from ECTRlMS 2009) this drug red uoed
`
`relapse rate by 30%, so these results are a little surprising. A second phase ill study is in
`.3 progress, and results should be available soon.
`If they see the same benefits, this will be
`an attractive medicine.
`
`-
`
`1: Laquinimod: results of the second phase lli trial comparing laquinimod, placebo and
`__ Avonex. Laquinimod had a modest effect on number of relapses, decreasing them by
`about 18%. Safety appears good. This agent has the advantage of being oral, but doesn’t
`-- offer any increased effectiveness over available treatments. (see AAN 2011 for other
`
`_
`
`I
`
`_
`
`results with this drug.)
`_ _:--
`.- Daclizumab: This is a monoclonal antibody given as a once a month injection.
`
`it binds the
`
`It decreased relapse rate by about 50% compared to placebo, and
`interleukin-2 receptor.
`i also decreased disability and MRI activity. There was one death from an infection, and a
`small increase in the rate of serious infections.
`
`_‘
`:
`
`'- AboutDr. L ds'ey
`Research Interests
`inapiDi-rections
`I _:_I_Links
`Clinic information
`
`" Icons-Souls
`
`__'-
`
`.
`
`I
`
`some concerning side effects. These results are very similar to their phase II trial reported
`in 2008, and a second phase lll study is in progress.
`Atacicept: One puzzling result was a study of atacicept, a protein that interferes with B
`
`cell activity. Depletion of B cells is very effective for MS, so we expected that atacicept
`would also improve MS. But instead, it seemed to increase disease activity. The
`
`_
`
`. difference in effect betwaen blocking B cell activity and getting rid of B cells completely is
`unexplained and unexpected. But it reinforces the point that often treatments do not do
`
`what we expect they will, and every drug needs rigorous testing before we accept it as
`
`
`If; QTPQ m9? 'Oxuo’é
`
`
`
`
`
`J. William Lindsey, MD
`University of Texas Multiple Sclerosis Research Group
`
`hiipzllmmvjwlinscymdsomiid'i‘iditml
`
`Biogen Exhibit 2229 9/i6i2019
`Mylan V. Biogen
`IPR 2018-01403
`
`
`
`:7 multiple Sclerosis Basic
`-
`information
`'
`
`ln_l;e_rferoniverslis
`3.
`iatiramernupdaie 11107
`
`_
`
`I
`
`_'
`E
`
`on stem cell's--2l13iaa_j-
`
`. Alemtuzumab: This is a monoclonal antibody that depletes a wide range of white blood
`'
`- cells. It is given yearly in a series of infusions over 5 days.
`in this study, they treated
`recently diagnosed subjects who had not received any previous treatment, and compared
`the alemtuzumab to Rebif. Alemtuzumab decreased relapse rate by 55% compared to
`Rebii’ (note this is not compared to placebo like the other trials). It also decreased
`_. disability slightly. Notable side effects included autoimmune thyroid and platelet
`' problems as seen in previous studies. This looks like a Very effective medicine, but with
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`Biogen Exhibit 2229
`Mylan v. Biogen
`IPR 2018-01403
`
`

`

`EC'I‘RJMS 201]
`
`Page 2 of2
`
`::_ Houston. Texas
`
`copyright 2007-2020 John William Lindsey
`
` =
`
`impfllwwijlindssm]d.comlid71.htmi
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`9/16f2019
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket