throbber
.. -.J -:'
`
`March 22, 2005
`
`HEALTIl SCIENCES
`LIBRARIES
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1116 PAGE 1
`
`

`

`SUPPLEMENT TO
`JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF
`
`DERMATOLOGY
`
`VOLUME 52
`
`MARCH 2005
`
`NUMBER 3
`
`Poster Abstracts
`
`American Academy of Dermatology
`63rd Annual Meeting
`February 18-22,2005
`New Orleans, LA
`
`Production and publication
`of this supplement made possible
`by a grant from
`Abbott Immunology
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1116 PAGE 2
`
`

`

`SUPPLEMENT TO
`JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF
`
`DERMATOLOGY
`
`VOLUME 52
`Copyright Ó 2005 by the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.
`
`NUMBER 3
`
`P1
`
`P3
`
`P4
`
`P6
`
`P8
`
`P10
`
`P26
`
`P33
`
`P36
`
`P41
`
`P65
`
`P66
`
`P75
`
`P80
`
`P83
`
`P97
`
`Continued on page 8A
`
`Statements and opinions expressed in the articles and communications herein are those of the author(s)
`and not necessarily those of the Editor(s), publisher, or Academy, and the Editor(s), publisher, and Acad-
`emy disclaim any responsibility or liability for such material. Neither the Editor(s), publisher, nor the Acad-
`emy guarantees, warrants, or endorses any product or service advertised in this publication, nor do they
`guarantee any claim made by the manufacturer of such product or service.
`
`7A
`
`POSTER DISCUSSION SESSIONS
`
`Production and publication of this supplement made possible by
`a grant from Abbott Immunology
`
`PDS 491—Psoriasis
`
`PDS 492—Lasers in Dermatology
`
`PDS 493—Acne
`
`PDS 494—Infections and Anti-ineffectives
`
`PDS 495—Pediatrics
`
`Acne
`
`Aging/Geriatrics
`
`Art, History, and Humanities of Dermatology
`
`Basic Science
`
`Clinical Dermatology and Other Cutaneous Disorders
`
`Connective Tissue Diseases
`
`Dermatitis (Atopic)
`
`Dermatitis (Contact and Allergic Irritant)
`
`Ginat W. Mirowski, DMD, MD
`Indianapolis, Indiana
`
`Dermatopathology
`
`Dermatopharmacology/Cosmeceuticals
`
`Digital/Electronic Technology
`
`March 2005
`
`Editor
`Jeffrey D. Bernhard, MD
`
`Deputy Editors
`Thomas G. Cropley, MD
`Karen Wiss, MD
`
`Editorial Office
`University of Massachusetts
`Medical School
`55 Lake Avenue
`North Worcester, MA 01655
`508-856-2583
`E-mail: melissa.derby@
`umassmed.edu
`
`Associate Editors
`Andrew Blauvelt, MD
`Portland, Oregon
`
`Ponciano D. Cruz, Jr, MD
`Dallas, Texas
`
`Jane M. Grant-Kels, MD
`Farmington, Connecticut
`
`Alexandra Boer-Kimball, MD
`Stanford, California
`
`Stuart J. Salasche, MD
`Tucson, Arizona
`
`Martin A. Weinstock, MD
`Providence, Rhode Island
`
`Assistant Editors
`Michael E. Bigby, MD
`Boston, Massachusetts
`
`Jean L. Bologonia, MD
`New Haven, Connecticut
`
`Mark Lebwohl, MD
`New York, New York
`
`Donald J. Miech, MD
`Marshfield, Wisconsin
`
`Scott A. Norton, MD
`Bethesda, Maryland
`
`Elise Olsen, MD
`Durham, North Carolina
`
`Founding Editor
`J. Graham Smith, Jr, MD
`Mobile, Alabama
`
`Editor Emeritus
`Richard L. Dobson, MD
`Charleston, South Carolina
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1116 PAGE 3
`
`

`

`Contents
`
`continued
`
`Education and Teaching in Dermatology
`
`Epidemiology and Health Services Administration
`
`Genodermatoses
`
`Hair and Nail Disorders
`
`Immunodermatology and Blistering Disorders
`
`Infection (Bacterial)
`
`Infection (Fungal)
`
`Infection (Viral, including AIDS)
`
`Internal Medicine Dermatology
`
`Lymphoma, Cutaneous/Mycosis Fungoides
`
`Melanoma and Pigmented Lesions
`
`Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer
`
`Pediatric Dermatology
`
`Photobiology, Phototherapy, and Photosensitivity Diseases
`
`Pigmentary Disorders and Vitiligo
`
`Psoriasis and Other Papulosquamous Disorders
`
`Skin Anatomy, Embryology, and Physiology
`
`Surgery (Cosmetic)
`
`Surgery (Dermatologic)
`
`Surgery (Laser)
`
`Wound Healing and Ulcers
`
`Author Index
`
`Subject Index
`
`P99
`
`P102
`
`P109
`
`P111
`
`P115
`
`P117
`
`P121
`
`P131
`
`P134
`
`P137
`
`P143
`
`P147
`
`P151
`
`P157
`
`P167
`
`P171
`
`P205
`
`P205
`
`P206
`
`P208
`
`P210
`
`214
`
`223
`
`8A MARCH 2005
`
`J AM ACAD DERMATOL
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1116 PAGE 4
`
`

`

`P2784
`REBOUND IN PATIENTS ABRUPTLY DISCONTINUED FROM ETANERCEPT
`Craig Leonardi, MD, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO,
`United States
`
`Psoriasis is a chronic disease that gradually returns after discontinuation of therapy.
`In some cases, disease can return to a greater extent than when treatment was
`initiated. Psoriasis relapse and rebound have been documented in multiple case
`reports of patients withdrawn from psoriasis treatment.1-6 To provide a clear
`definition for relapse and rebound, the Medical Advisory Board of the National
`Psoriasis Foundation defined rebound as ‘‘PASI of 125% or greater from baseline or
`new generalized pustular, erythrodermic or more inflammatory psoriasis occurring
`within 3 months of stopping therapy.’’7 Etanercept, an antietumor necrosis factor
`(TNF)-a targeted fusion protein, was recently approved for the treatment of
`moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. During the clinical trials, rebound
`occurred in 1 of 409 patients (0.2%) during the 12-week observation period after
`etanercept treatment. Patients in clinical practice often present a variety of unique
`challenges that may differ markedly from the experience gathered during clinical
`trials. Four patients who developed conversion of morphology or significant
`worsening of psoriasis during commercial treatment with etanercept will be
`discussed. Three of these patients were successfully controlled with etanercept
`but experienced significant disease worsening on discontinuation of treatment. The
`fourth patient experienced a dramatic flare while receiving etanercept therapy. The
`management of these 4 patients will be described. These case reports highlight the
`importance of close clinical follow-up with patients whenever systemic psoriasis
`therapies are used.
`
`References
`1. Boyd, Menter. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989;21:985.
`2. Cacoub et al. Lancet 1988;2:219.
`3. Heidenheim et al. Br J Dermatol 1990;122:719.
`4. Mahendran, Grech. Br J Dermatol 1998;139:934.
`5. Georgala et al. Br J Dermatol 2000;142:1057.
`6. Kamarashev et al. Dermatology 2002;205:213.
`7. Gordon et al. Psoriasis Forum 2002;8:1.
`
`Dr. Leonardi is on the Advisory Boards of Amgen, Genentech, Centocor, and Serono;
`has received grant support from Amgen and Genentech; and is a member of the
`speakers’ bureau for Amgen, Genentech, and Serono.
`
`P2786
`REPEATED COURSES OF ALEFACEPT ARE COST-EFFECTIVE FOR THE LONG-
`TERM MANAGEMENT OF PSORIASIS
`Steven Feldman, MD, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem,
`NC, United States; Alan Menter, MD, Texas Dermatology Associates, Dallas, TX,
`United States
`
`Physicians attempting to obtain a second course of alefacept therapy are often
`confronted with payers questioning the cost-effectiveness of continued treatment.
`Alefacept is a safe remittive agent, with a proportion of patients maintaining
`response after completion of treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the
`cost-effectiveness of alefacept in patients for whom the decision has been made to
`continue therapy. Cost-efficacy per day is calculated for each of the 3 biologic agents
`approved for psoriasis: alefacept 15 mg intramuscularly weekly; efalizumab 1 mg/kg
`subcutaneously (SC) weekly; and etanercept 50 mg SC twice weekly for 3 months,
`followed by 25 mg SC twice weekly. The analysis examines total direct costs
`(including drug costs, office visit fees, injection fees) and costs for laboratory
`monitoring during treatment as per product labeling. These direct utilization-related
`costs are divided by the efficacy as determined by PASI 75 response rates from large-
`scale clinical trials. The cost-efficacy is then divided by the number of days for 18-
`and 24-month periods to provide cost-efficacy per day. For PASI 75 responders to
`alefacept, median remission periods of 7 months for the first course and 12 months
`for the second course were assumed based on clinical trials.1,2 At 18 months, cost-
`efficacy per day was $122 for alefacept (2 courses of the drug), $203 for efalizumab,
`and $123 for etanercept. At 24 months, cost-efficacy per day was $91 for alefacept,
`$203 for efalizumab, and $119 for etanercept. Advantages of alefacept are due in part
`to the long treatment-free remission periods and its safety profile. Repeated courses
`of alefacept are cost-effective for the long-term management of patients with
`psoriasis.
`
`References
`1. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;47:821.
`2. J Drugs Dermatol 2003;2:624.
`
`Dr. Feldman is a consultant for Biogen Idec, Inc.
`
`Supported by Biogen Idec, Inc.
`
`P2785
`REFRACTORY ERYTHRODERMA: CASE REPORT (JUST PSORIASIS OR
`PSYCHIATRIC DISORDER?)
`Carolina Gouveia, MD, Carlos Garcia, MD, Miguel-Duarte Reis, MD, Joa˜o Pedro
`Freitas, MD, University Clinic of Dermatology, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon,
`Lisbon, Portugal
`
`A 51-year-old male history teacher was admitted to our clinic in April 2003 with
`erythroderma of 2 months’ duration. He had suffered from bipolar disorder since the
`age of 26; he had re-started lithium carbonate therapy a few days before the
`appearance of the dermatosis, after a 10-year interval. His father and grandfather had
`had psoriasis.
`
`During hospitalization, biopsies were performed, which disclosed ‘‘drug eruption.’’
`Lithium carbonate therapy was discontinued, and he started prednisolone therapy
`(30 mg daily), with rapid improvement; he was discharged with steroid and
`carbamazepine therapy (psychiatrist’s prescription). Two weeks later there was
`a new flare of generalized erythema, chills, and fever, which led to the suspension of
`carbamazepine thereapy and readmission to the hospital after 20 days.
`
`We started prednisolone and increased the dosage to 70 mg/d. New biopsies
`showed ‘‘eczema.’’ After 2 weeks of high-dose steroid therapy without improvement,
`it was gradually tapered and 4 new biopsies revealed ‘‘psoriasis.’’ Five weeks after
`admission, acitretin was started. Meanwhile, because the patient was not medicated
`with any mood stabilizer, he had been allowed to spend his weekends at home; we
`observed a slight worsening every Monday/Tuesday. We started measuring lithium
`blood levels and noticed a repetitive pattern: positive values (although subthera-
`peutic) at the beginning and no measurable values at the end of the week.
`Confronted with this fact, both the patient and close family members strongly
`denied ingestion of the drug.
`
`Nine weeks after admission we started intramuscularly administered methotrexate
`(25 mg weekly), discontinued acitretin, and suspended the ‘‘weekend break,’’ with
`gradual clinical improvement and normalization of lithium blood levels. He was
`dismissed at the third month, with moderate clinical improvement, and was closely
`monitored in our outpatient clinic; blood lithium levels were again positive, and
`there was worsening of his clinical condition.
`
`After being submitted to a medical committee in order to retire earlier from his job
`because of
`the skin disease, he showed a gradual clinical
`improvement.
`Methotrexate was tapered and he attended our clinic irregularly for some months.
`In a later outpatient visit, we observed a complete remission. The patient told us he
`was already retired.
`
`Nothing to disclose.
`
`MARCH 2005
`
`P2787
`RESULTS OF A PHASE 2 DOSE-RANGING AND SAFETY EXTENSION STUDY
`OF A NOVEL ORAL FUMARATE, BG-12,
`IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE
`PSORIASIS
`A. Langner, MD, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland; M. C. Spellman,
`MD, Biogen Idec, Inc., San Diego, CA, United States
`
`Fumaric acid esters have been used to treat patients with psoriasis for more than 10
`years in Germany, but their use is limited by gastrointestinal adverse events, which
`frequently lead to discontinuation. A novel oral
`fumarate, BG-12, has been
`developed to improve the efficacy and tolerability of fumaric acid esters in patients
`with psoriasis. A phase II multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-
`ranging trial was conducted in Poland to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability
`of BG-12. The trial also included a 24-week, open-label, safety extension phase.
`Patients with chronic plaque, exanthematic guttate, erythrodermic, palmoplantar,
`or pustular psoriasis for 1 year or longer and a baseline PASI score of 16 to 24 were
`eligible. Therapies for psoriasis were discontinued before study enrollment, except
`for topical salicylic acid and emollients. In the double-blind phase, patients
`(N = 144) were equally randomized to 1 of 4 treatment groups: placebo or BG-12
`120 mg (1 capsule), 360 mg (3 capsules), or 720 mg (6 capsules) daily (study drug
`dosed 3 times per day) for 12 weeks. Patients who completed the double-blind phase
`or who withdrew after 8 weeks because of lack of efficacy were eligible to enroll in
`the open-label phase. Assessments included PASI, Physician’s Clinical Global
`Impression, patient’s global assessment, quality of life, and reported adverse events.
`Improvement in psoriasis was observed as early as 2 weeks and was dose-related.
`BG-12 was well tolerated, with infrequent gastrointestinal complaints. The open-
`label extension phase enrolled 108 patients (28 from each of the placebo and 120-
`mg BG-12 groups and 26 each from the 360-mg and 720-mg BG-12 groups). The
`results of this phase II study are promising, with substantial efficacy and good
`tolerability for this novel oral fumarate.
`
`Supported by Biogen Idec, Inc.
`
`J AM ACAD DERMATOL
`
`P193
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1116 PAGE 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket