throbber
ity10 might render MS trials comparing new vs pres-
`ently available treatments more easily feasible.
`
`Acknowledgment
`The authors thank TEVA Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and
`Schering AG for providing the MR data of the treated arms of
`previous MS trials. They also thank all the investigators who
`contributed to data collection of these treatment trials and Prof. L.
`Kappos for his critical review of the manuscript.
`
`References
`1. Nauta JJP, Thompson AJ, Barkhof F, Miller DH. Magnetic
`resonance imaging in monitoring the treatment of multiple
`sclerosis patients: statistical power of parallel-groups and
`crossover designs. J Neurol Sci 1994;122:6–14.
`2. Truyen N, Barkhof F, Tas M, et al. Specific power calculations
`for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in monitoring active
`relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (MS): implications for
`phase II therapeutic trials. Multiple Sclerosis 1997;2:283–290.
`3. Tubridy N, Ader HJ, Barkhof F, Thompson AJ, Miller DH.
`Exploratory treatment trials in multiple sclerosis using MRI:
`sample size calculations for relapsing remitting and secondary
`progressive subgroups using placebo controlled parallel
`groups. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;64:50–55.
`4. Sormani MP, Molyneux PD, Gasperini C, et al. Statistical
`power of MRI monitored trials in multiple sclerosis: new data
`
`and comparison with previous results. J Neurol Neurosurg
`Psychiatry 1999;66:465–469.
`5. Pozzilli C, Bastianello S, Koudriatseva T, et al. Magnetic res-
`onance imaging changes with recombinant human interferon
`b-1a: a short term study in relapsing–remitting multiple scle-
`rosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996;61:251–258.
`6. European Study Group on Interferon Beta-1b in Secondary
`Progressive MS. Placebo-controlled multicentre randomised
`trial of interferon beta-1b in treatment of secondary progres-
`sive multiple sclerosis. Lancet 1998;352:1491–1497.
`7. Comi G, Filippi M, Wolinsky JS, and European/Canadian
`Glatiramer Acetate Study Group. European/Canadian multi-
`center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of
`the effects of glatiramer acetate on magnetic resonance
`imaging-measured disease activity and burden in patients
`with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001;49:290–
`297.
`8. Sormani MP, Bruzzi P, Miller DH, Gasperini C, Barkhof F,
`Filippi M. Modelling MRI enhancing lesion counts in multiple
`sclerosis using a negative binomial model: implications for
`clinical trials. J Neurol Sci 1999;163:74–80.
`9. Kappos L, Moeri D, Radue EW, et al. Predictive value of
`gadolinium-enhanced MRI for relapse rate and changes in
`disability/impairment in multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis.
`Lancet 1999;353:964–969.
`10. Rovaris M, Filippi M. Magnetic resonance techniques to mon-
`itor disease evolution and treatment trial outcomes in multi-
`ple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol 1999;12:337–344.
`
`Onset of multiple
`sclerosis associated
`with anti-TNF therapy
`
`Article abstract—Therapies aimed at inhibiting tumor necrosis factor
`(TNF), a proinflammatory cytokine implicated in autoimmune disease are
`effective, especially for rheumatoid arthritis. We report a patient with new
`onset MS closely associated with the initiation of anti-TNF therapy for juve-
`nile rheumatoid arthritis. It is possible that the inhibition of TNF triggered
`MS in this individual.
`NEUROLOGY 2001;57:1885–1888
`
`Nancy L. Sicotte, MD; and Rhonda R. Voskuhl, MD
`
`Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is a proinflammatory
`cytokine that is involved in lymphocyte signaling
`and plays an important role in cell-mediated immu-
`nity. TNF has multiple effects including the induc-
`tion of adhesion molecules on endothelial cells and
`the enhanced production of reactive oxygen species.1
`In contrast to its proinflammatory properties, TNF
`can also mediate T cell receptor–induced apoptosis.2
`Therefore, TNF and its receptors are involved not
`only in inflammation, but also in the regulation of
`
`From the Division of Brain Mapping (Dr. Sicotte), Department of Neurology
`(Drs. Sicotte and Voskuhl), UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.
`N.L.S.
`is supported by a Clinical Investigator Award (NINDS K08/
`NS02044) and the Leonard and Dorothy Strauss Scholars in Neuroscience
`Program and is a Harry Weaver Neuroscience Scholar of the National
`Multiple Sclerosis Society (JF2107). R.R.V. is supported by NINDS/NIH
`RO1 NS36680 and is a Harry Weaver Neuroscience Scholar of the National
`Multiple Sclerosis Society (JF2094).
`Received June 20, 2001. Accepted in final form August 8, 2001.
`Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Nancy L. Sicotte, 710
`Westwood Boulevard, Rm. A135, Los Angeles, CA 90095; e-mail:
`nsicotte@ucla.edu
`
`immune activity through the elimination of autore-
`active inflammatory cells.3
`TNF is thought to be an important mediator in
`several autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid
`arthritis, ulcerative colitis, and MS.4 Anti-TNF ther-
`apy was initially considered for the treatment of MS
`based on studies of experimental autoimmune en-
`cephalomyelitis (EAE) as well as human data. In-
`creased TNF production from T lymphocytes has
`been associated with their ability to transfer more
`severe disease in an adoptive transfer model of
`EAE.5 Blocking TNF with antibodies or soluble TNF
`receptors decreased EAE severity.6 In humans, high
`levels of TNF␣ have been found in MS plaques and
`CSF.7
`Despite these findings, anti-TNF treatments for
`MS worsen disease. In a trial of anti-TNF targeted
`therapy using a recombinant protein consisting of
`the TNF receptor fused to a human IgG heavy chain
`(lerencept), treated patients had significantly more
`exacerbations than placebo-treated patients.8 Treat-
`
`Copyright © 2001 by AAN Enterprises, Inc. 1885
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`Biogen Exhibit 2117
`Mylan v. Biogen
`IPR 2018-01403
`
`

`

`Figure 1. Axial T2-weighted MRI obtained at the time of
`initial presentation with optic neuritis. Arrows indicate
`areas of white matter hyperintensity consistent with
`demyelination.
`
`ment with anti-TNF antibody in two patients with
`rapidly progressive MS led to a transient increase in
`gadolinium-enhancing lesions and no improvement
`in disease severity.9 These studies suggest that anti-
`TNF therapy worsens MS.
`Etanercept (Enbrel) is a fusion protein consisting
`of the extracellular portion of the human TNF recep-
`tor linked to the Fc portion of human IgG. It has
`become widely used in the treatment of refractory
`rheumatoid arthritis.10 Several unpublished observa-
`tions of presumed isolated demyelinating events and
`worsening of established MS disease activity in indi-
`viduals treated with etanercept led to a drug warn-
`ing by Immunex in October 2000. We report a
`patient with new-onset MS that coincided with the
`initiation of etanercept treatment for juvenile rheu-
`matoid arthritis.
`
`Case presentation. A 21-year-old woman with juvenile
`rheumatoid arthritis presented with a 1-week history of
`pain and decreased vision in her right eye. She had no
`previous visual symptoms or other neurologic dysfunction.
`She had no recent illness or travel.
`She had been diagnosed with juvenile rheumatoid ar-
`thritis at age 8. Oral and IM gold, methotrexate, and sul-
`fasalazine were only partially effective. Nine months of
`treatment with etanercept markedly improved her arthri-
`tis. She was also on celecoxib (Celebrex) and lansoprazole
`1886 NEUROLOGY 57 November (2 of 2) 2001
`
`Figure 2. MRI scans obtained 2 months after presenta-
`tion. There were no new complaints and the neurologic
`examination was normal. (A) Axial T2-weighted images
`reveal two new large areas of hyperintensity. (B) Axial T1-
`weighted images obtained after the administration of gad-
`olinium demonstrates enhancement of these same areas
`consistent with active inflammation.
`
`(Prevacid). Family history was significant for RA in her
`maternal grandmother. There was no family history of MS.
`On physical examination, joint deformities of the fin-
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`

`

`was normal. An MRI of the brain revealed two large en-
`hancing lesions (figure 2). Etanercept was discontinued,
`and another course of high-dose steroids was initiated. She
`began treatment
`for her arthritis with leflunomide
`(Arava).
`Six weeks later, the patient was evaluated again. She
`had worsening arthritis symptoms, numbness in her right
`foot, and dysequilibrium. Her examination revealed a new
`up-going toe on the right. Another brain MRI showed two
`new enhancing lesions (figure 3). At this time, a diagnosis
`of MS was made and the patient began treatment with
`interferon ␤-1a.
`
`Discussion. Shortly after this patient presented,
`Immunex issued a drug warning citing observations
`of rare cases of demyelinating episodes including op-
`tic neuritis and transverse myelitis in patients with
`rheumatoid arthritis treated with etanercept. At the
`time of this writing, 20 to 25 cases of CNS demyeli-
`nation associated with the use of etanercept have
`been reported to Immunex (Donald Goodkin, unpub-
`lished data, 2001).
`Optic neuritis developed in this individual after
`using etanercept for 9 months. Cerebral MRI per-
`formed 2 months later revealed new disease activity
`in the absence of new symptoms. Despite discontinu-
`ing etanercept, new enhancing lesions and neuro-
`logic symptoms developed, fulfilling the criteria for
`clinically definite relapsing remitting MS. What role,
`if any, did the use of etanercept play in the onset of
`MS in this individual? Three possibilities exist. First,
`the development of MS and the use of etanercept
`could have been coincidental. Second, the use of et-
`anercept could have triggered latent MS, uncovering
`the disease that the patient was destined to develop
`at some point in the future. Third, the use of etaner-
`cept could have caused MS to develop in this patient
`who otherwise would never have had the disease.
`When patients with established MS were treated
`with lerencept, relapse rates increased in the first
`few weeks of treatment. In contrast, our patient was
`on therapy for 9 months before the first clinical at-
`tack. The latency period difference suggests that this
`patient did not have undiagnosed MS at the time
`etanercept treatment began.
`Current guidelines are to avoid the use of anti-
`TNF drugs in individuals with a history of MS or
`demyelinating disease. The overall numbers of indi-
`viduals with new-onset demyelinating events on
`anti-TNF therapy appears to be small, but these ep-
`isodes can be clinically silent, making it difficult to
`assess the actual numbers of affected individuals.
`The risk may be higher at the initiation of therapy or
`alternatively could increase with cumulative expo-
`sure. In light of the case reported here, a serial MRI
`study designed to systematically assess the risk of
`developing demyelinating lesions at specific time
`points after the initiation of etanercept therapy ap-
`pears warranted.
`Patients who develop new neurologic symptoms
`while on any anti-TNF medication should be moni-
`November (2 of 2) 2001 NEUROLOGY 57 1887
`
`Figure 3. MRI scans performed 3.5 months after presenta-
`tion and 6 weeks after discontinuing etanercept. Axial T2-
`weighted images show new lesions in the left temporal
`lobe and right frontal lobe (top row). Axial T1-weighted
`images obtained after contrast was given shows enhance-
`ment of these areas (bottom row).
`
`gers and toes were noted. Visual acuity in the right eye
`was 20/20⫺2 and 20/20⫺1 in the left. There was a 1⫹
`relative afferent papillary defect on the right. Disks were
`edematous, right greater than left. Visual fields were full
`to confrontation. The rest of the neurologic examination
`was normal.
`An MRI of the brain revealed several T2 hyperintensi-
`ties within the white matter including the right middle
`cerebellar peduncle, posterior temporal lobe, and right
`frontal lobe (figure 1). After contrast, two small areas of
`enhancement were noted high in the right frontal lobe.
`Spinal fluid analysis showed six white blood cells, normal
`protein and glucose, an elevated IgG index at 1.1 (normal
`range, 0.0 to 0.6) with two oligoclonal bands. Visual evoked
`responses showed significant slowing on the right. Brain-
`stem auditory evoked responses and somatosensory evoked
`responses were normal.
`After a 5-day course of high-dose IV methylpred-
`nisolone, the right eye pain resolved and vision was nor-
`mal. At the time of this patient’s presentation, no official
`warnings regarding the use of etanercept and the risk of
`demyelination had been reported. The patient was reluc-
`tant to stop therapy with etanercept because of the im-
`provement in her arthritis symptoms. She continued her
`usual medications plus a prednisone taper.
`The patient was evaluated 2 months later. There were
`no new symptoms. Visual acuity was 20/20 in both eyes,
`the disk edema had resolved. The neurologic examination
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`

`tored closely with frequent MRI regardless of their
`clinical status. Finally, all cases of new-onset demy-
`elination should be identified and studied to deter-
`mine what, if any, risk factors they share. Thorough
`investigations of these cases may lead to insights
`into the pathogenesis of MS.
`
`References
`1. Hohlfeld R. Inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor-alpha: promis-
`ing agents for the treatment of multiple sclerosis? Mult Scler
`1996;1:376–378.
`2. Zheng L, Fisher G, Miller RE, Peschon J, Lynch DH, Lenardo
`MJ. Induction of apoptosis in mature T cells by tumour necro-
`sis factor. Nature 1995;377:348–351.
`3. Segal BM, Cross AH. Fas(t) track to apoptosis in MS: TNF
`receptors may suppress or potentiate CNS demyelination.
`Neurology 2000;55:906–907.
`4. Raza A. Anti-TNF therapies in rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s
`disease, sepsis, and myelodysplastic syndromes. Microsc Res
`Tech 2000;50:229–235.
`
`5. Powell MB, Mitchell D, Lederman J, et al. Lymphotoxin and
`tumor necrosis factor-alpha production by myelin basic
`protein-specific T cell clones correlates with encephalitogenic-
`ity. Int Immunol 1990;2:539–544.
`6. Selmaj KW, Raine CS. Experimental autoimmune encephalo-
`myelitis: immunotherapy with anti-tumor necrosis factor anti-
`bodies and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors. Neurology
`1995;45(6 suppl 6):S44–S49.
`7. Selmaj K, Raine CS, Cannella B, Brosnan CF. Identification of
`lymphotoxin and tumor necrosis factor in multiple sclerosis
`lesions. J Clin Invest 1991;87:949–954.
`8. The Lerencept Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. TNF neutral-
`ization in MS: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled
`multicenter study. The Lenercept Multiple Sclerosis Study
`Group and The University of British Columbia MS/MRI Anal-
`ysis Group. Neurology 1999;53:457–465.
`9. van Oosten BW, Barkhof F, Truyen L, et al. Increased MRI
`activity and immune activation in two multiple sclerosis pa-
`tients treated with the monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor
`antibody cA2. Neurology 1996;47:1531–1534.
`10. Fernandez-Botran R. Soluble cytokine receptors: novel immuno-
`therapeutic agents. Expert Opin Invest Drugs 2000;9:497–514.
`
`Transcallosal bands: A
`sign of neuronal tract
`degeneration in
`early MS?
`
`Article abstract—A pattern of injury observed in patients at high risk for
`MS described as transcallosal bands (TCB) is hypothesized to be the result of
`neuronal tract degeneration in earliest MS, extending from typical acute,
`focal demyelinating lesions located along the lateral borders of the corpus
`callosum. The TCB, a T2-hyperintense lesion traversing the corpus callosum
`is recognized on 3-mm thick, T2-weighted imaging, develops over months and
`persists over years.
`NEUROLOGY 2001;57:1888–1890
`
`Jack H. Simon, MD, PhD; Lawrence Jacobs, MD; and R. Philip Kinkel, MD
`
`Although the principal pathology of acute MS lesions
`in the CNS is an inflammatory-demyelinating pro-
`cess, there is evidence from biochemical and micro-
`scopic analyses of brain specimens that the acute
`inflammatory MS lesion is also the site of early ax-
`onal injury.1 In vivo MRS studies of early and acute
`lesions show reduced N-acetylaspartate and support
`the concept of early axonal injury in focal MS le-
`sions.2,3 Beyond the earliest stages of disease, for
`example, once a patient can be classified as in the
`stage of relapsing MS, the disease is characterized
`by diffuse and global injuries, as indicated by abnor-
`malities of the normal-appearing white matter
`(NAWM),4 and by brain and/or spinal cord atrophy.5
`Although some abnormalities in the NAWM are
`
`From the Department of Radiology–Neuroradiology (Dr. Simon), University
`of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver; Department of Neurology (Dr.
`Jacobs), Buffalo General Hospital, NY; and Cleveland Clinic Foundation
`(Dr. Kinkel), OH.
`The CHAMPS Trial was supported by Biogen, Inc., Cambridge, MA.
`Presented in part at the annual meeting of the Academy of Neurology; San
`Diego, CA; May 2, 2000.
`Received May 18, 2001. Accepted in final form August 1, 2001.
`Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jack H. Simon, Depart-
`ment of Radiology/MRI, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Box
`A-034, 4200 E. Ninth Avenue, Denver, CO 80262; e-mail: jack.simon@uchsc.edu
`
`1888 Copyright © 2001 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.
`
`likely the result of microscopic or other primary focal
`pathology to which conventional MRI is insensitive,
`an alternative explanation is that these abnormali-
`ties may be the consequence of multiple focal inju-
`ries, with extension of these injury to distant sites,
`such as through tract degeneration.6 Although tract
`degeneration is well recognized in the late stages of
`MS, as seen at autopsy, it has not been considered a
`major feature of early MS. Here we present direct
`imaging evidence for an injury pattern in the corpus
`callosum suggestive of tract degeneration emanating
`from focal demyelinating-like lesions at the earliest
`stages of MS, which we call transcallosal bands (TCB).
`
`Methods. The TCB pattern is demonstrated based on
`MRI of patients enrolled in the Controlled High-Risk Sub-
`jects Avonex Multiple Sclerosis Prevention Study
`(CHAMPS) trial.7 Inclusion in the trial was based on the
`first occurrence of an acute, isolated neurologic syndrome
`consistent with demyelination, and an MRI study with a
`minimum of two lesions 3 mm or greater in diameter, one
`of which was periventricular or ovoid. The baseline and
`follow-up MRI protocol at 1.5 T included 1) axial interme-
`diate and more T2-weighted classic spin-echo series with
`3-mm nongapped slices, 2) a pre– and post–contrast en-
`hanced T1-weighted classic spin-echo series with 5-mm
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket