`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Filed: April 10, 2019
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BIOGEN MA, INC.
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`Patent No. 8,399,514
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review IPR2018-01403
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF DAVID L. ANSTAETT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
`FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF DAVID L. ANSTAETT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1056
`PAGE 1
`
`
`
`
`
`I, David L. Anstaett, declare as follows:
`1.
`I am a patent litigation partner at Perkins Coie LLP.
`
`
`
`2.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bars of the Commonwealth of
`
`Virginia and the State of Wisconsin. I am also admitted to practice before the
`
`United States Courts of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the United States Courts of
`
`Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and the United States Courts of Appeals for the
`
`D.C. Circuit.
`
`3. My Bar membership numbers are VA 46614 and WI 1037884.
`
`4.
`
`I have been practicing law for approximately 18 years, including
`
`litigating patent cases, specifically focused on pharmaceutical and life science
`
`patent cases, for approximately 10 years.
`
`5.
`
`In addition, I have represented the Petitioner and/or its various related
`
`entities in litigating significant pharmaceutical patent cases, such as the following
`
`patent cases:
`
` AstraZeneca AB v. Mylan Laboratories Ltd., Civil Action No. 3:12-
`
`cv-01378-MLC-TJB (U.S. District Court for the District of New
`
`Jersey, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit);
`
` Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Civil
`
`Action No.1:09-cv-08824-WHP (U.S. District Court for the Southern
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1056
`PAGE 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`District of New York, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit,
`
`U.S. Supreme Court);
`
` Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., No.
`
`10-cv-7246 (KBF) (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
`
`New York);
`
` Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Yeda Research & Development Co.,
`
`IPR2015-00643, IPR2015-00644, IPR2015-00830 (PTAB, U.S. Court
`
`of Appeals for the Federal Circuit)
`
` Teva Pharmaceutical USA Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Civil
`
`Action No. 1:14-cv-01278-GMS (U.S. District Court for the District
`
`of Delaware, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit);
`
` Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Civil
`
`Action No. 1:17-cv-00007-IMK (U.S. District Court for the Northern
`
`District of West Virginia);
`
` Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Civil
`
`Action No. 1:16-cv-01267-GMS (U.S. District Court of District of
`
`Delaware);
`
` The Medicines Co. v. Mylan Inc., Civil Action No. 15-1113
`
`(consolidated) (U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit);
`
`
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1056
`PAGE 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Hospira, Inc. v. Sylvia Mathews Burwell, Civil Action No. 8:14-cv-
`
`02662-GJH (U.S. District Court District of Maryland, U.S. Court of
`
`Appeals for the Fourth Circuit);
`
` BTG International Ltd. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, Civil Action
`
`No. 15-cv-5909-KM-JBC (U.S. District Court for the District of New
`
`Jersey, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit).
`
`6.
`
`I have never been disbarred, suspended, sanctioned, or cited for
`
`contempt by any court or administrative body. I am not currently suspended in any
`
`bar, or by any court or administrative body.
`
`7.
`
`I have never had a court or administrative body deny my application
`
`for admission to practice.
`
`8.
`
`I am familiar with the subject matter of this proceeding. In addition to
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,399,514 (“the ’514 patent”) and its prosecution history, I am
`
`familiar with the technology at issue and Tecfidera®, the pharmaceutical product
`
`for which the ’514 patent is listed by Biogen IDEC Inc. in FDA’s publication,
`
`Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations, commonly
`
`referred to as the “Orange Book.” I have been litigating issues surrounding
`
`Tecfidera® and the ’514 patent for over 1 year in Biogen International, Inc. v.
`
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Civil Action No. 17-cv-00116-IMK (N.D.W. Va.), on
`
`behalf of Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1056
`PAGE 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9.
`
`In connection with my work on the Tecfidera litigation, I have
`
`become familiar with the prior art references that are the subject of this proceeding.
`
`10. Given my familiarity with the underlying facts and my litigation
`
`experience with the Federal Rules of Evidence, I have experience and expertise
`
`important to representing Petitioner’s interests in this matter.
`
`11.
`
`I have read and will comply with Office Patent Trial Practice Guide
`
`and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`12.
`
`I agree to be subject to the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq. and
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`13.
`
`I have previously applied for, and been granted, admission pro hac
`
`vice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office in IPR2015-00643,
`
`IPR2015-00644, and IPR2015-00830.
`
`14.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own
`
`knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are
`
`believed to be true; and further that these statements are made with the knowledge
`
`that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine, imprisonment, or
`
`both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`Dated: April 10, 2019
`
`
`/s/ David L. Anstaett
`David L. Anstaett
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1056
`PAGE 5
`
`