throbber

`
`
`Paper 8
`Entered: October 16, 2018
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-01384
`Patent 8,934,535 B2
`____________
`
`Before KEVIN W. CHERRY, GARTH D. BAER, and NABEEL U. KHAN,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KHAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`
`Dismissing Petition
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5(a) and 42.71(a)
`and
`Granting Request to Treat Settlement Documents as
`Confidential Business Information
`37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c)
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2018-01384
`Patent 8,934,535 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`On October 8, 2018, the parties filed a Joint Motion to Terminate
`Inter Partes Reviews (Paper 6) and Joint Request to Keep Separate (Paper
`7). Because we have not instituted an inter partes review, we treat the Joint
`Motion to Terminate as a joint motion to dismiss the Petition. The Motion
`requests dismissal because the litigation between the parties involving US
`Patent No. 8,934,535 B2 (the ’535 patent) has been dismissed and the parties
`do not contemplate any litigation or proceeding involving the ’535 patent in
`the foreseeable future. Paper 6, 3. The parties concurrently filed a true copy
`of their settlement agreement. Id. at 2; see Ex. 2001.
`This proceeding is at an early stage. Petitioner filed a Petition for
`Inter Partes Review on July 12, 2018. Paper 2. Patent Owner has not filed
`a Preliminary Response, and we have neither considered the merits of the
`Petition nor decided whether to institute trial.
`Under these circumstances, we determine it is appropriate to dismiss
`the Petition. See 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5(a), 42.71(a). We also determine it is
`appropriate to treat the parties’ settlement agreement (Ex. 2001) as
`confidential business information, and to keep that document separate from
`the files of the ’610 patent.
`This paper does not constitute a final written decision pursuant to
`35 U.S.C. § 318(a).
`Accordingly, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that the Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent
`No. 8,934,535 B2 is dismissed; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Exhibit 2001 be maintained as
`confidential business information and kept separate from the files of U.S.
`Patent No. 8,934,535 B2.
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01384
`Patent 8,934,535 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`Andrew Sommer
`Louis L. Campbell
`Katherine Vidal
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`asommer@winston.com
`llcampbell@winston.com
`kvidal@winston.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Neil A. Rubin
`Kent Shum
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`nrubin@raklaw.com
`kshum@raklaw.com
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket