throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`OF COMMERCE
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. B- 1450
`Al-dria, Virgiiiia
`www.uspto.g~
`
`22313-1450
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`I
`
`I
`
`FILING DATE
`
`I
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`:::::[:ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`I
`
`CONFIRMATIO
`
`12/553,107
`
`09/03/2009
`
`Brian Ault
`
`POZN.PO026US
`
`5949
`
`10/09/2015
`
`108197
`7590
`Parker Highlander PLLC
`1120 South Capital of Texas Highway
`Bldg. 1, Suite 200
`Austin, TX 78746
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`EXAMINER
`
`YUSTICE, GINA CHIEUN YU
`
`ART UNIT
`
`1617
`
`PAPER NUNMER
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`NOTIFICATION El~:J
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`10/09/2015
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any,
`
`is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated
`following e-mail address(es):
`
`"Notification Date"
`
`to the
`
`docket@phiplaw.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005
`DRL v. Horizon
`IPR2018-01341
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/553,107
`
`Art Unit: 1617
`
`Page 2
`
`The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first
`
`to invent
`
`provisions.
`
`Continuation of No. 5:
`
`Applicant's reply has overcome the following rejections:
`
`1) Rejection made under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (a) over Hassan-Alin et al.
`
`(Gastroenterology,
`
`124 (4), 2003) in view of Plachetka (US 6926907 132), which was
`
`indicated in the previous Office action dated March 26, 2015;
`
`2) Obviousness double patenting rejection made in view of claims 1-55 of US
`
`Pat. No. 6926907 B2 in view of Hassan-Alin; and
`
`3) Obviousness double patenting rejection made in view of claims 57-75 of
`
`Application No. 14/045156
`
`(now US Pat. No. 8852636).
`
`Continuation of No. 12:
`
`Claims 19, 29, 33, 34, 40, 42 and 45 remain rejected on the ground of
`
`nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-16 of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 8945621 B2 (previously cited as Application No. 12/822612).
`
`The rejection is
`
`deemed proper and maintained for the reasons of record. Although applicant
`
`indicated
`
`disagreement with the rejection, no specific reasons or explanation was given.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to GINA YU JUSTICE whose telephone number
`
`is
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005
`DRL v. Horizon
`IPR2018-01341
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/553,107
`
`Art Unit: 1617
`
`Page 3
`
`(571)272-8605.
`
`The examiner can normally be reached on Monday through Friday,
`
`from 9:OOAM until 5:00 PM.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful,
`
`the examiner's
`
`supervisor, Johann Richter can be reached on 571-272-0646.
`
`The fax phone number
`
`for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about
`
`the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov.
`
`Should
`
`you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact
`
`the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free).
`
`If you would like assistance from a
`
`USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information
`
`system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
`
`/GINA YU JUSTICE/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1617
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005
`DRL v. Horizon
`IPR2018-01341
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`

`Advisory Action
`Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief
`
`Application No.
`121553,107
`
`Examiner
`GINA YU JUSTICE
`
`Applicant(s)
`AULT ET AL.
`
`Art Unit
`1617
`
`AIA (First
`
`Inventor to File) Status
`
`No
`
`--The MAILING DATE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence
`THE REPLY FILED 25 September 2015 FAILS TO PLACE THIS APPLICATION IN CONDITION FOR ALLOWANCE.
`NO NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED
`1. Z The reply was filed after a final
`this application, applicant must timely file
`To avoid abandonment
`rejection. No Notice of Appeal has been filed.
`of
`affidavit, or other evidence, which places the application in condition for allowance;
`one of the following replies: (1) an amendment,
`fee) in compliance with 37 CFR 41.31; or (3) a Request
`for Continued Examination (RCE)
`in compliance with
`(2) a Notice of Appeal
`(with appeal
`INS is a utility or plant application. Note that RCEs are not permitted in design applications.
`ot CrR 1.
`The reply must be filed within one of
`the following time periods:
`a) Z The period for reply expires 6 months from the mailing date of
`
`1
`
`1 1+
`
`11
`
`the final rejection.
`
`address --
`
`b)
`
`c)
`
`r_1
`
`is later.
`
`is earlier.
`
`(1 ) the mailing date of this Advisory Action; or (2) the date set forth in the final rejection, whichever
`r_1 The period for reply expires on:
`the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of the final rejection.
`In no event, however, will
`A prior Advisory Action was mailed more than 3 months after the mailing date of the final rejection in response to a first after-final
`reply filed
`within 2 months of
`The current period for reply expires
`months from the mailing date of
`the mailing date of the final rejection.
`the prior Advisory Action or SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of the final rejection, whichever
`(b) or (c). ONLY CHECK BOX (b) WHEN THIS ADVISORY ACTION IS THE
`Examiner Note:
`is checked, check either box (a),
`If box 1
`FIRST AFTER-FINAL REPLY WHICH WAS FILED WITHIN TWO MONTHS OF THE FINAL
`FIRST RESPONSE TO APPLICANT'S
`REJECTION. ONLY CHECK BOX (c)
`IN THE LIMITED SITUATION SET FORTH UNDER BOX (c). See MPEP 706.07(f).
`Extensions of time may be obtained under 37 CFR 1.1 36(a). The date on which the petition under 37 CFR 1.1 36(a) and the appropriate
`the fee. The
`extension fee have been filed is the date for purposes of determining the period of extension and the corresponding amount of
`appropriate extension fee under 37 CFR 1. 1 7(a) is calculated
`from: (1) the expiration date of the shortened statutory period for reply originally
`Any reply received
`set in the final Office action; or (2) as set forth in (b) or (c) above,
`if checked.
`by the Office later than three months after the
`term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`mailing date of the final rejection, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent
`NOTICE OF APPEAL
`2. Z The Notice of Appeal was filed on 25 September2015.
`A brief in compliance with 37 CFR 41.37 must be filed within two months of the
`(37 CFR 41.37(e)), to avoid dismissal of
`(37 CFR 41.37(a)), or any extension thereof
`the appeal. Since
`date of filing the Notice of Appeal
`a Notice of Appeal has been filed, any reply must be filed within the time period set forth in 37 CFR 41.37(a).
`AMENDMENTS
`
`a)
`
`b)
`
`c)
`
`d)
`
`or simplifying the issues for
`
`rejected claims.
`
`3. r_J The proposed amendments filed after a final
`filing a brief, will not be entered because
`rejection, but prior to the date of
`r_1 They raise new issues that would require further consideration and/or search (see NOTE below);
`r_1 They raise the issue of new matter (see NOTE below);
`r_1 They are not deemed to place the application
`in better form for appeal by materially reducing
`appeal; and/or
`a corresponding number of finally
`r_1 They present additional claims without canceling
`. (See 37 CFR 1.116 and 41.33(a)).
`NOTE:
`in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121. See attached Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment
`4. F~ The amendments are not
`5. Z Applicant's reply has overcome the following rejection(s): See continuation sheet.
`
`(PTOL-324).
`
`6. E] Newly proposed or amended claim(s)_ would be allowable if submitted in a separate, timely filed amendment canceling
`
`allowable claim(s).
`(a) El will not be entered, or (b) El will be entered, and an explanation of how the
`7. r-1 For purposes of appeal,
`the proposed amendment(s):
`new or amended claims would be rejected is provided below or appended.
`AFFIDAVIT OR OTHER EVIDENCE
`
`the non-
`
`8.
`
`A declaration (s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CIFIR 1.130(b) was/were
`
`filed on
`
`9.
`
`applicant
`
`The affidavit or other evidence
`filed after final action, but before or on the date of filing a Notice of Appeal will not be entered because
`is necessary and was not earlier
`failed to provide a showing of good and sufficient reasons why the affidavit or other evidence
`presented. See 37 CFR 1.1 16(e).
`10. M The affidavit or other evidence
`filed after the date of filing the Notice of Appeal, but prior to the date of filing a brief, will not be entered
`because the affidavit or other evidence
`failed to overcome all rejections under appeal and/or appellant fails to provide
`a showing of good
`is necessary and was not earlier presented. See 37 CFR 41.33(d)(1).
`and sufficient reasons why it
`11. M The affidavit or other evidence
`is entered. An explanation of the status of
`the claims after entry is below or attached.
`REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION/OTHER
`The request for reconsideration has been considered but does NOT place the application in condition
`See continuation sheet.
`
`12.
`
`for allowance
`
`because:
`
`13.
`
`Note the attached
`
`Information Disclosure Statement(s).
`
`(PTO/SB/08)
`
`Paper No(s).
`
`14.
`Other:
`STATUS OF CLAIMS
`
`15. The status of the claim(s) is (or will be) as follows:
`
`Claim(s) allowed:
`
`Claim(s) objected to:
`19, 29, 33, 34, 40, 42 and 45.
`Claim(s) rejected:
`Claim(s) withdrawn from consideration:
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL-303 (Rev. 08-2013)
`
`Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief
`
`Part of Paper No. 20151006
`
`/GINA YU JUSTICE/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1617
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005
`DRL v. Horizon
`IPR2018-01341
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket