throbber
(12) United States Patent
`(10) Patent N0.:
`US 6,483,899 B2
`
`Agraharam et al.
`(45) Date of Patent:
`*Nov. 19, 2002
`
`USOO6483899B2
`
`(54) VOICE MESSAGING SYSTEM
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: Sanjay Agraharam, Marlboro, NJ
`(US); Randy G. Goldberg, Princeton,
`NJ (US); Robert Edward Markowitz,
`Glen Rock, NJ (US); Kenneth H.
`Rose", Middletown, NJ(US)
`
`(
`
`(73) Assigflce. AT&T Corp New York NY(US)
`’
`’
`*
`-
`.
`-
`-
`-
`_
`) che‘
`3:11:10???IEZZEED‘SHOEICZCSEQEHZ‘; TEE;
`pp .
`.
`153(9): and 15 sublefn to the t"Vemy Year
`patent
`term prOVISIOHS 0f 35 USC-
`154(a)(2).
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days.
`
`(21) Appl. N0.: 09/100,607
`.
`Filed:
`
`Jun. 19, 1998
`
`(22)
`
`Prior Publication Data
`
`U‘S‘ PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`3/1997 Gordon ................. 379/100.08
`5,608,786 A
`5,689,550 A * 11/1997 Garson et a1.
`........... 379/8818
`5,712,903 A *
`1/1998 Bartholomew et al.
`..... 379/230
`5,742,905 A *
`4/1998 Pepe etal. .................. 455/461
`..... 455/413
`5,802,466 A *
`9/1998 Gallant et al.
`
`5,822,405 A * 10/1998 Astarabadi
`.. 379/8818
`
`5,825,854 A * 10/1998 Larson etal.
`............ 379/8814
`5,920,835 A *
`7/1999 Huzenlaub et al.
`......... 704/235
`5,987,100 A * 11/1999 Fortman etal.
`.. 379/8814
`
`............... 455/412
`6,023,700 A *
`2/2000 Owens etal.
`6,058,164 A *
`5/2000 lbnka et al.
`............... 379/671
`6,061,718 A *
`5/2000 Nelson ............. 709/206
`6,064,723 A *
`5/2000 c6116 et al.
`..
`.. 379/8814
`6,072,862 A *
`6/2000 Srinivasan
`379/10008
`6,075,844 A *
`6/2000 Goldberg et al.
`........ 379/8817
`6,085,231 A *
`7/2000 Agraharam et a].
`379/8822
`6,161,082 A * 12/2000 Goldberg et al.
`.............. 709/3
`6,173,259 B1 *
`1/2001 Bijletal.
`................... 704/235
`6,219,638 B1
`4/2001 Padmanabhan et al.
`..... 704/235
`
`
`
`* cited bv examiner
`'
`Primary Examiner—Fan Tsang
`Assistant Examiner—()vidio Escalante
`
`US 2002/0067808 A1 Jun. 6, 2002
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`(52) US. Cl.
`
`Int. Cl.7 ......................... H041“ 11/00; G10L 15/26
`,
`................................ 379/8814; 378/8813;
`378/8822; 378/9324; 378/10013; 704/235§
`704/260; 704/270
`
`(58) Field Of Search ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 379/8813, 8814,
`379/10001, 67.1, 100.08, 88.18, 230, 100.13,
`88.22, 93.24; 704/235, 260, 270, 231, 251
`
`A network-based voice messaging system is provided. A
`voice message is received at a network. The network con-
`verts the voice message into a text message by utilizing
`speech recognition software. The text message is transmitted
`to the intended recipient as an electronic mail
`(e—mail)
`message or facsimile document and is received by the
`intended recipient on conventional text receiving equipment.
`
`13 Claims, 2 Drawing Sheets
`
`(65)
`
`(51)
`
`30°
`
`205
`
`
`
`VJICE MESSAGE
`RECEIVED AT NEINORT<
`
`
`SENDER AND/OR RECIPIENT
`IETERMINE FORMA' FOR
`RECEIVED MESSAGE
`
`
`
`
`DETERRINE TEXTMESSAGE ADDRESS
`
`FJR RECIPIENT
`
`TRANSMIT
`
`
`TEXT
`
`
`MESSAGE
`
`
` R
`
`245
`A'IEMF‘T TO
`PROVIDE VOICE
`MESSAGE
`
`
`250
`
`VES
`
`
`
`/VOICEMAIIROX
`
`F111
`
`PROVIDE VOICE
`255
`MESSAGE TO
`
`FEEIPIENI
`
`
`
`
`215~
`
`225
`
`UTILIZE RESTRICTED
`DOMAIN S’EECH PROGRAM
`(IE REOUIREJ)
`
`
`
`
`
`920 >
`
`I
`CONVERT ORAL MESSAGE
`To TENT MESSAGE
`
`
`
`TEXT MESSAGE EOH
`2301 AIDIBLV P,AY CONVERTED
`SENDER
`
`T
`
`2351 TRANSNIT TEXT MESSAGE
`To RECIPIENT
`
`T
`
`DATABASE REIATED TO
`2401 STORE INFORMATION IV
`TEXT TRANSMISSION
`
`1
`
`APPLE 1014
`
`APPLE 1014
`
`1
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Nov. 19, 2002
`
`Sheet 1 0f 2
`
`US 6,483,899 B2
`
`FIG.
`
`1
`
`120
`
` NETWORK
`
`
`
`122
`dill-D
`
`124
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Nov. 19, 2002
`
`Sheet 2 0f 2
`
`US 6,483,899 B2
`
`I:CI13.
`
`E?
`
`VOICE MESSAGE
`RECEIVED AT NETVDRK
`
`SENDER AND/0R RECIPIENT
`DETERMINE FORMAT FOR
`RECEIVED MESSAGE
`
`30°
`
`205
`
`210
`
`
`ATTEMPT TO
`TRANSMIT
`NO
`PROVIDE VOICE
`TEXT
`
`MESSAGE MESSAGE
`
`
`245
`
`315
`
`
`
`
`VOICE
`DETERMINE TEXT
`
`MAILBOX
`MESSAGE ADDRESS
`FULL
`FOR RECIPIENT
`
`
`N0
`
`220
`
`225
`
`250
`
`UTILIZE RESTRICTED
`DOMAIN SPEECH PROGRAM
`(IF REQUIRED)
`
`CONVERT ORAL MESSAGE
`TO TEXT MESSAGE
`
`255
`
`PROVIDE VOICE
`MESSAGE To
`RECIPIENT
`
`230
`
`235
`
`240
`
`AUDIBLY PLAY CONVERTED
`TEXT MESSAGE FOR
`SENDER
`
`TRANSMIT TEXT MESSAGE
`TO RECIPIENT
`
`I
`
`STORE INFORMATION IN
`DATABASE RELATED TO
`TEXT TRANSMISSION
`
`3
`
`

`

`US 6,483,899 B2
`
`1
`VOICE MESSAGING SYSTEM
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention relates to a method and apparatus
`for processing and transmitting a voice message. More
`specifically, the invention provides for converting a voice
`message to a text message and transmitting the text message
`to the intended recipient. A service provider network
`receives the voice message transmitted by the sender and
`converts the message into a text format. The network then
`transmits the text message to the intended recipient.
`Currently, it is possible for a sender of a message to send
`text messages to an intended recipient. These messages can
`be electronic mail messages that are generated on the
`personal computer of the sender and transmitted over a
`network to the intended recipient’s personal computer.
`Alternatively, these text messages can be documents that are
`transmitted to the intended recipient by utilizing a facsimile
`machine. However, with both of these known methods for
`sending a text message to an intended recipient, the sender
`of the message must have access to transmission equipment
`that is capable of sending the text message, e.g., a personal
`computer or a facsimile machine.
`The sender of a message who wants to send a text
`message to an intended recipient may not always have
`access to conventional
`text
`transmission equipment. For
`example, a sending party that wants to send an e-mail
`message to an intended recipient could be at an airport and
`thus not have access to conventional e-mail transmission
`equipment. Therefore,
`it would be desirable to provide a
`capability where a person who desires to transmit a text
`message to an intended recipient could send the text mes-
`sage to the intended recipient without requiring the sender to
`have access to conventional transmission equipment for
`sending text messages.
`Currently, it is also possible for an intended recipient of
`a voice mail message to receive the voice mail message from
`the sending party. However, as with the situation above
`where the sender of a text message must have access to
`conventional transmission equipment, the intended recipient
`of a voice mail message must have access to a conventional
`telephone in order to receive the voice mail message. As
`such, it may not always be possible for the intended recipient
`of a voice mail message to receive the message at a time
`when desired. Therefore,
`it would also be desirable to
`provide a capability to receive a voice mail message where
`the person who desires to receive the voice mail message
`does not have access to a conventional telephone.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention overcomes the drawbacks in the
`above-described communication scenarios. In accordance
`
`with the present invention, a network-based voice messag-
`ing system is provided. The system provides the capability
`to convert a voice mail message to a text message.
`A voice message is received at a network. The network
`converts the voice message into a text message by utilizing
`known speech recognition software. The text message is
`transmitted to the intended recipient as an electronic mail
`(e-mail) message or facsimile document and is received by
`the intended recipient on conventional text receiving equip-
`ment. Thus, a sending party that desires to send a text
`message but who does not have access to conventional text
`transmission equipment could utilize a telephone connected
`to a network to provide a voice message for an intended
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`recipient. The network would convert the voice message into
`a text message and transmit the text message to the intended
`recipient. In the second situation where an intended recipient
`of a voice message desires to receive the message but does
`not have access to a conventional telephone, the intended
`recipient could have the network convert the voice message
`to a text message and transmit the text message to the
`personal computer or facsimile machine of the intended
`recipient.
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment for the voice messaging
`system of the present invention.
`FIG. 2 illustrates a process flow chart for the method steps
`in practicing an embodiment of the present invention.
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`FIG. 1 illustrates a functional block diagram for one
`embodiment of the network-based voice messaging system
`of the present invention. Avoice message, or oral message,
`is input into network 120 by utilizing telephone 100. Tele-
`phone 100 is connected to network 120 through local
`exchange carrier switch 108. Upon receipt of the voice
`message at network 120, network 120 will convert the voice
`message into a text message by utilizing known speech
`recognition software 124, which is stored in network 120.
`After network 120 converts the voice message to a text
`message, network 120 transmits the text message to the
`intended recipient’s receiving apparatus 130, such as by
`connection through LEC switch 109, where the message is
`received by the intended recipient.
`Network 120 may be an integrated services provider
`network or a telephone network. As such, network 120
`provides interconnection between the sender’s telephone
`100 and the intended recipient’s receiving apparatus 130.
`Network 120 is capable of converting the voice message into
`a variety of different types of text messages by utilizing
`speech recognition software 124 and standardized text for-
`matting software. For example, network 120 is capable of
`converting the input voice message into either an electronic
`mail (e-mail) message or a text document to be transmitted
`as a facsimile document. Network 120 contains transmission
`equipment to transmit the converted text message to the
`intended recipient’s receiving apparatus 130.
`The intended recipient’s receiving apparatus 130 may be
`a variety of different types of equipment, e.g., a personal
`computer or a facsimile machine. All that is required is that
`the apparatus be capable of receiving the particular type of
`text-formatted message that is transmitted by network 120,
`for example, a personal computer for receiving electronic
`mail (e-mail) messages or a facsimile machine for receiving
`fax documents. For purposes of illustration,
`the present
`invention will be described in an embodiment where the
`
`voice message is converted into an electronic mail message
`and transmitted to the intended recipient’s personal com-
`puter 130.
`In continuing with the description of an embodiment of
`the present invention, the invention has utility for a person
`who desires to send an electronic mail message to an
`intended recipient but who does not have access to an
`electronic mail transmission device. In order to send an
`electronic mail message to an intended recipient
`in this
`circumstance,
`the sending party, who is a subscriber to
`network 120, dials into network 120 by utilizing telephone
`100. After dialing into network 120, network 120 will ask
`the calling party if they would like to place a voice phone
`
`4
`
`

`

`US 6,483,899 B2
`
`3
`call or would like to send an electronic mail message. If the
`calling party desires to place a voice phone call, the calling
`party will be prompted to dial the phone number of the
`desired party and network 120 will attempt to establish the
`phone connection. If the calling party desires to send an
`electronic mail message, the network will prompt the calling
`party for information in order to compose and transmit the
`e-mail message.
`When sending an electronic mail message to an intended
`recipient,
`the sending party must
`identify the intended
`recipient for the e-mail message so that the intended recipi-
`ent’s e-mail address can be determined. There are many
`possible ways for identifying who the intended recipient is.
`All that is required is that an electronic mail address for the
`recipient be ultimately determined. The easiest method for
`determining this information is for the sender to directly
`input the e-mail address for the recipient into the network
`when recording the voice message. Network 120 can prompt
`the calling party to input the intended recipient’s e-mail
`address. The calling party can input the e-mail address by
`speaking the e-mail address into network 120 and having
`speech recognition software 124 interpret the spoken e-mail
`address, or the sending party could enter the recipient’s
`e-mail address by utilizing the telephone’s keypad.
`Alternative methods for determining the e-mail address
`for the recipient could be for the sender to input other
`information identifying the recipient into the network. For
`example, the sender could speak the recipient’s name into
`the network. If this methodology was utilized, the network
`would utilize this information to access database 122 to
`
`correlate the name of the recipient to an e-mail address for
`the recipient.
`Database 122 contains identification information for
`potential recipients. This identification information could
`be, as previously mentioned, the name of the recipient. As
`such, the sender can enter any identification information for
`the intended recipient into the network and the network
`would utilize this information to obtain the correct e-mail
`
`address for the recipient by accessing database 122. The
`only requirement
`is that
`the identification information
`entered by the sender must also be stored in database 122 so
`that correlation of the identification information to an e—mail
`
`address can be accomplished.
`Information can be input to database 122 by either the
`calling party or by the network itself. The network can
`provide for entering information into database 122 by
`utilizing, for example, subscriber information provided to
`the network if the intended recipient is also a subscriber to
`the network or by having the network service provider enter
`information that is obtained from personal data lists that are
`commercially available. Additionally,
`information is also
`input to network database 122 through normal use of the
`present invention. For example, when a sender sends an
`c-mail document to an intended recipient, all information
`entered by the sender into network 120 when sending the
`message is automatically entered into the database. In this
`manner, information is input to database 122 through normal
`use of the system by the subscriber, and thus does not
`necessarily have to be input by a separate data input step that
`is specifically intended for inputting information into the
`database.
`In the situation where there is either no information
`
`contained in database 122 for an intended recipient or where
`there is information contained in the database for a particular
`intended recipient, e.g., the name of the intended recipient,
`but there is no e-mail address available for the intended
`
`10
`
`15
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`recipient, the sending party will be provided with the rec-
`ognized name of the intended recipient, as recognized by
`speech recognition software 124, and will be prompted to
`provide an e-mail address for the intended recipient.
`In order to compose an e-mail message for transmission
`to an intended recipient, the sender will orally speak the
`message to be delivered into network 120. As mentioned
`previously, network 120 contains speech recognition soft-
`ware 124. Speech recognition software 124 will convert the
`oral message into a text format by utilizing known speech-
`to-text conversion software. Once the oral message is con-
`verted into a text format, network 120 will format the
`text-formatted document into an e-mail message and trans-
`mit the e-mail message to the intended recipient by utilizing
`the intended recipient’s e-mail address, which has been
`determined through the process as described previously.
`Currently known speech recognition software has limita-
`tions with respect
`to the library of words that can be
`recognized. For example, not all voice recognition software
`programs will be able to recognize words that relate solely
`to a particular segment of the population. For example,
`words that are commonly used by medical personnel are not
`usually words that are commonly used in the general popu-
`lation. Therefore, most general purpose voice recognition
`systems will not contain these words in their database.
`However, there are voice recognition systems that are spe-
`cifically designed to be utilized with speech that is specific
`to a particular segment of the population. These voice
`recognition systems are generally known as restricted
`domain systems.
`Because a particular sending party may desire to send a
`message that contains words that may not be contained in a
`general purpose speech recognition software program, but
`that may only be contained in a “restricted domain” speech
`recognition program, network 120 contains restricted
`domain speech recognition programs. Network 120 will
`query the sending party as to whether they desire to utilize
`a restricted domain speech recognition program. If the
`sending party realizes that their message contains words that
`are not commonly used, the sending party would select from
`a menu of restricted domains that would be provided to the
`sending party by network 120. The sending party would then
`select the restricted domain appropriate to their message and
`network 120 would utilize this restricted domain voice
`recognition program to recognize the speech of the sending
`party.
`If the sending party does not select a restricted domain
`software program upon call initiation and the network is not
`able to recognize the spoken message of the sending party
`because it contains words that are not contained in the
`
`general purpose speech recognition software, the network
`will inform the sender that the speech cannot be recognized
`and will prompt the user to select a restricted domain for
`speech interpretation that may possibly contain the spoken
`words.
`
`After the network composes the electronic mail message
`by interpreting and converting the voice message, and
`before transmitting the e-mail message, network 120 will
`audibly provide the sending party with the name, e-mail
`address, and message content of the e-mail message as
`converted from the voice message of the sender. The name
`that network 120 provides to the sender for verification is the
`name that
`is recognized and interpreted by the speech
`recognition software as input by the sender. The e-mail
`address is that address either accessed from database 122 or
`
`input by the sender. The message content of the e-mail
`
`5
`
`

`

`US 6,483,899 B2
`
`5
`message is the converted voice message as input by the
`sender. By reviewing this information, the sending party is
`able to verify that the speech recognition software accurately
`recognized and converted the voice message as input by the
`sender.
`
`The sender can modify any incorrect information in the
`e-mail message before transmission of the e-mail message.
`The sending party can input corrected information for the
`intended recipient by speaking corrected information into
`network 120.
`When the text document is transmitted to the intended
`
`recipient, the e-mail address of the sending party is included
`in the e-mail message. This feature is desirable to enable the
`recipient to reply to the e-mail.
`In an alternative embodiment, when sending the e-mail
`message to the intended recipient, it is not required that
`network 120 convert
`the actual spoken message of the
`sending party into a text message for transmission as an
`electronic mail message. Network 120 could instead gener-
`ate an electronic mail message for the intended recipient and
`attach the actual subject matter of the message as a wave
`audio file (.wav) attachment to the e-mail message. In this
`manner, network 120 would convert and save the oral
`message as an electronic file, attach the file to the e-mail
`message that is generated by network 120, and transmit the
`e-mail message and attached file to the intended recipient.
`Thus, network 120 would not be required to convert the
`spoken message into a text message but rather would only be
`required to save the spoken message as an electronic file and
`attach this file to the e-mail message. This elimination of the
`requirement to interpret and convert the spoken message to
`a text message would reduce the capabilities required of the
`speech recognition software because the speech recognition
`software now would only be required to interpret
`the
`addressing information spoken by the sender and not the
`actual subject matter of the spoken message. If network 120
`also had access to other electronic files of the sender, e.g.,
`those saved on a web page of the sender, the sender could
`also attach these files to the e—mail message for transmission
`to the intended recipient as well.
`After the text message is transmitted, network 120 will
`notify the sender of the status of transmitting the message to
`the intended recipient while the sender is still connected to
`the network. The network will notify the sender as to
`whether the transmission was successful or not.
`
`As mentioned previously, the present invention also has
`utility for an intended recipient of a voice message who does
`not have access to a telephone for receiving the voice
`message. In order to receive a voice message as an electronic
`mail message instead, the receiving party, who is a sub-
`scriber to network 120, provides information to network 120
`that
`the recipient desires to receive voice messages as
`electronic mail messages. A voice messaging service is
`provided to the subscriber, i.e., the intended recipient, by
`network 120. The intended recipient’s desires for the format
`for receipt of voice messages can be stored in database 122.
`In operation, when a calling party attempts to place a call
`to the intended recipient and the intended recipient does not
`answer the call, network 120 provides the calling party with
`the opportunity to leave a message for the called party.
`Network 120 will query the calling party as to whether the
`calling party desires to leave a message for the called party.
`If the calling party does desire to leave a message for the
`called party, network 120 will check database 122 to deter-
`mine if the called party desires to receive messages as voice
`messages or as electronic mail messages. It is desired to
`
`6
`determine this in advance of the calling party actually
`leaving a message for the called party because if the called
`party desires electronic mail messages, network 120 may
`have to prompt the calling party for selection of a restricted
`domain for speech recognition software, as described pre-
`viously, This may be desirable in order for network 120 to
`be able to accurately interpret the voice message by utilizing
`speech recognition software 124.
`If the called party has not specifically designated that they
`desire to receive voice messages as e-mail messages, but
`upon checking the desires of the intended recipient the
`network determines that the voice mail box of the intended
`
`recipient is full, a default instruction could be provided to
`the network to transmit the message to the recipient as an
`e-mail message in this circumstance. In this manner, instead
`of the calling party not being able to leave any message [or
`the called party because the called party’s voice mail box is
`full,
`the calling party would still be able to transmit a
`message for the called party as an e-mail message.
`After transmission of a text message, either at the direc-
`tion of the sender or the intended recipient, network 120
`stores information related to the transmission of the text
`message in database 122. This information can be data that
`indicates the time of the transmission, the time required for
`transmitting the message, the sender of the document, the
`recipient, the cumulative number of documents transmitted
`by a particular sender or received by a particular recipient in
`any given time period, and the method of transmission, e.g.,
`e-mail message or fax document. Additional information can
`be stored depending upon the requirements of the sender, the
`recipient, and the network service provider. This information
`can be utilized for accounting purposes or for a variety of
`other purposes.
`There are a variety of methods available for billing
`subscribers for use of this network-based voice messaging
`system. The system could either charge for each message or
`could provide for an unlimited number of messages for a set
`billing amount. Alternatively, the service provided by the
`system can be provided as part of a larger service package
`and thus not be billed as a separate service.
`If the service is to be separately billed and if there is to be
`a charge for each message transmission, various methods are
`possible to account for, and thus bill for, each message
`transmission. The party that designates that a particular
`voice message be transmitted as a text document could be
`billed for the service. That is, if the intended recipient is tie
`network subscriber and the recipient desired that the voice
`message be transmitted to them as a text message, tie
`intended recipient could be billed for the service. If tie
`sender of the text message is the subscriber to the network
`and desired that the message be sent as a text message, tie
`sender could be charged for the service.
`if the service is
`Billing and payment for the service,
`separately billed, can be accomplished in a variety of ways.
`The subscriber could enter a credit card number into tie
`network at
`the time of each document
`transmission, tie
`charges could be separately billed to the account holder on
`a regular basis, or the charges could be included in tie
`account holder’s home or office phone bill.
`FIG. 2 provides the process steps for practicing an
`embodiment of the present invention. Step 200 indicates tie
`step where a voice message is received at a service provider
`network. As previously disclosed, the network may be, for
`example, a telephone network or an integrated services
`network. In step 205, the sender and/or the intended recipi-
`ent will determine the format required for the received
`
`
`
`10
`
`15
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6
`
`

`

`US 6,483,899 B2
`
`7
`message. Based on the desires of the sender and/or the
`intended recipient,
`the network will determine if a text
`message is to be transmitted to the intended recipient, step
`210. If a text message is to be transmitted to the intended
`recipient,
`the network will determine the text message
`address for the recipient, step 215, and convert
`the oral
`message into a text message by utilizing known speech to
`text conversion software, step 220. As previously disclosed,
`if the message contains words that may not be contained in
`a general purpose speech recognition software program, a
`restricted domain program may be utilized, step 225.
`After conversion of the voice message into a text mes-
`sage,
`the network will audibly play the converted text
`message for the sending party so that the sending party can
`perform error correction on the converted message, step 230,
`if required. In step 235, the network will transmit the text
`message to the intended recipient and in step 240 the
`network will store information related to the transmitted text
`document in a database.
`
`to be
`if a text message is not
`As stated previously,
`transmitted in response to step 210, the network will attempt
`to provide a voice message to the intended recipient, step
`245. The network will determine if the voice mail box of the
`recipient is full, step 250. If the voice mail box for the
`intended recipient is full, the network will provide a text
`message to the intended recipient in accordance with steps
`215—240. If the voice mail box is not full, a voice message
`will be provided to the intended recipient, step 255.
`Several variations on the disclosed embodiments are
`
`contemplated. In the disclosed embodiments, the network is
`disclosed as transmitting a text message to a single recipient;
`however, the network is capable of transmitting the message
`to multiple recipients, e.g., broadcasting the message. The
`sender could designate a single group identifier to identify
`all intended recipients. The network database would contain
`information that would identify each intended recipient that
`is included in the group identifier and information related to
`those individuals, e.g., the e-mail address for each recipient.
`The network would then send the message to each individual
`that is included in the group identifier.
`The present invention is also not limited to transmitting
`the text message as an electronic mail message. As men-
`tioned previously, the transmitted text message can also be
`a facsimile document. The speech recognition software
`would convert the spoken message to a text file. Known
`formatting software would convert the text file to a fax
`document. If the message is transmitted as a facsimile
`document, the recipient’s receiving apparatus 130 could be
`a personal computer that is capable of receiving fax docu-
`ments or could be a standardized facsimile machine. If the
`
`message is converted into a facsimile format, it would not be
`possible to attach wave files (.wav) or other files to the
`facsimile message, as can be done and as was described in
`the electronic mail context.
`
`Additionally, it is not required that a receiving party of a
`voice mail message pre—indicate, i.e., before receipt of the
`voice mail message, their desires for receiving the message
`to network 120, e.g., as an electronic mail message or a
`voice mail message. If a voice mail message is received for
`an intended recipient and no information is stored in data-
`base 122 with respect to the recipient’s desires for the format
`for the message, network 120 will deliver the voice mail
`message to the intended recipient’s voice mail box. If the
`intended recipient then desires to receive the message as a
`text document, e.g., as an e-mail message or a facsimile
`document, the recipient will communicate their desires to
`
`8
`network 120 and network 120 will convert and transmit the
`
`message to the intended recipient as a text document, as
`described previously.
`As described above, a network-based voice messaging
`system is provided. The disclosed embodiments are illus—
`trative of the various ways in which the present invention
`may be practiced. Other embodiments can be implemented
`by those skilled scope of the present invention.
`What is claimed is:
`
`1. A method for transmitting an oral message to an
`intended recipient comprising the steps of:
`
`receiving at a network an oral message for an intended
`recipient from a sending party; and
`determining whether the recipients voice mailbox is full
`and, if the voice mail box was full, performing the
`following:
`querying the sending party regarding the use of
`restricted domain speech recognition software and
`receiving a response;
`converting the oral message to a text message using
`speech recognition software, wherein restricted
`domain speech recognition software is used if the
`sending party’s response indicates that it should be
`used; and
`transmitting the text message to the intended recipient.
`2. The method of claim 1, wherein said querying the
`sending party includes permitting the sending party to select
`from a menu of restricted domains.
`
`3. The method of claim 1, wherein said text message is an
`electronic mail message.
`4. The method of claim 1, wherein said text message is a
`facsimile document.
`
`5. The method of claim 1, further determining whether the
`database has an entry corresponding to the intended recipi-
`ent and, if not, creating an entry for the intended recipient in
`an intended recipient database based on the received voice
`message.
`6. A method for transmitting an oral message to an
`intended recipient comprising the steps of:
`receiving an oral message at a network for an intended
`recipient from a sending party;
`determining a required format for transmitting the oral
`message to the intended recipient by said network;
`converting the oral message to a text message;
`converting said text message to a second oral message and
`providing the second oral message to the sending party
`prior to transmitting the text message to the intended
`recipient;
`receiving oral correction information from the sending
`party prior to transmitting the text message to the
`intended recipient;
`modifying said text message based on the correction
`information prior to transmitting the text message to the
`intended recipient; and
`transmitting the oral message to the intended recipient in
`the required format.
`7. The method of claim 6, wherein receiving an oral
`message includes receiving addressing data that was entered
`by the sender on a telephone keypad.
`8. The method of claim 6, wherein an intended recipient
`database has a record

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket