`
`––––––––––
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`––––––––––
`
`Apple Inc.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Qualcomm Inc.,
`Patent Owner
`
`––––––––––
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2018-01279
`Patent 7,844,037
`
`––––––––––
`
`DECLARATION OF PUNEET KOHLI IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR
`
`PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`1
`
`QUALCOMM EXHIBIT 2003
`Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Inc., IPR2018-01279
`Page 1
`
`
`
`I, Puneet Kohli, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am more than twenty-one years of age, am competent to present
`
`this declaration, and have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein.
`
`2.
`
`I have been practicing law in the field of intellectual property, and
`
`specifically patent litigation, for over five (5) years.
`
`3.
`
`I have extensive experience litigating patent infringement cases in
`
`many different district courts across the United States. My experience in
`
`patent litigation matters includes, but is not limited to: taking depositions of
`
`expert witnesses; assisting experts in drafting expert reports regarding
`
`invalidity and infringement; drafting claim construction briefs; drafting briefs
`
`associated with motions for summary judgments regarding invalidity and
`
`infringement issues; drafting invalidity and infringement contentions; and
`
`participating in patent-related hearings.
`
`4.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the State Bar of Texas. I am also
`
`admitted to practice before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit,
`
`the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, and the
`
`United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
`
`2
`
`QUALCOMM EXHIBIT 2003
`Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Inc., IPR2018-01279
`Page 2
`
`
`
`5.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body. I have never been the subject of any ethical
`
`grievance procedure or investigation.
`
`6.
`
`No court or administrative body has ever denied my application for
`
`admission to practice before it.
`
`7.
`
`I have never had any sanctions or contempt citations imposed against
`
`me by any court or administrative body.
`
`8.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board's Rules of practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of Title
`
`37 of the C.F.R.
`
`9.
`
`I agree to be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct as
`
`set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37
`
`C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`10.
`
`I have an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this
`
`proceeding. I have substantively reviewed all materials filed in this Inter Partes
`
`Review, including the Petition for Inter Partes Review and all accompanying
`
`exhibits, and the Preliminary Response to the Petition for Inter Partes Review
`
`and all accompanying exhibits. Additionally, I assisted in drafting the
`
`Preliminary Response to the Petition for Inter Partes Review filed in this
`
`3
`
`QUALCOMM EXHIBIT 2003
`Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Inc., IPR2018-01279
`Page 3
`
`
`
`matter on behalf of Patent Owner. I am thus very familiar with the subject
`
`matter in this proceeding.
`
`11.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
`
`correct.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`March 19, 2019
`
`
`
`Puneet Kohli
`Baker Botts L.L.P.
`98 San Jacinto Blvd., Suite 1500
`Austin, Texas 78701
`Tel.: 512.322.2611; Fax: 512.322.3611
`puneet.kohli@bakerbotts.com
`
`4
`
`QUALCOMM EXHIBIT 2003
`Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Inc., IPR2018-01279
`Page 4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
