throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`GOOGLE LLC, ZTE (USA), INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`LG ELECTRONICS INC., HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC.,
`HUAWEI DEVICE CO. LTD., HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD.,
`HUAWEI DEVICE (DONGGUAN) CO. LTD.,
`HUAWEI INVESTMENT & HOLDING CO. LTD.,
`HUAWEI TECH. INVESTMENT CO. LTD., and
`HUAWEI DEVICE (HONG KONG) CO. LTD.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Cywee Group Ltd.
`
`(record) Patent Owner
`
`IPR2018-01257
`IPR2018-01258
`
`Patent Nos. 8,552,978 and 8,441,438
`
`THIRD DECLARATION OF PROF. MAJID SARRAFZADEH
`
`1
`
`Google 1044
`
`

`

`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I, Majid Sarrafzadeh, declare as follows.
`1.
`
`2.
`
`The terms of my engagement and my qualifications are as-stated in
`
`my prior declarations, which are Exhibits 1002 in the inter partes review
`
`proceedings with trial numbers IPR2018-01257 and IPR2018-01258.
`
`3.
`
`I have reviewed Professor LaViola’s declaration, Ex. 2032, ¶28, in
`
`which he states:
`
`A PHOSITA would be motivated not to combine a Withanawasam
`with Bachmann, because Bachmann explicitly teaches away from
`using its sensor system and fusion method on any devices made of
`magnetic materials. Ex. 1004, 13:42-47 (“Sensors … of the present
`invention can be used to track motion and orientation of simple rigid
`bodies as long as they are made of non-magnetic materials.”
`(emphasis added)). All smartphones contain many magnets and
`magnetic materials. These include, inter alia, magnets in the phones’
`speakers, and magnetic materials making up many internal steel and
`gold parts, digital compasses, and often the housings of the
`smartphones. Because smartphones contain so many magnetic
`materials, a PHOSITA would avoid combining Bachmann’s sensor
`system and sensor fusion method with Withanawasam’s smartphone
`because the Bachmann teaches away from such a combination.
`
`(Ex. 2032, ¶28).
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`4.
`
`I am of the opinion that a person of ordinary skill in the art, in the
`
`relevant timeframe (approximately 2009), would not have found Bachmann to
`
`teach away from combination with Withanawasam.
`
`5.
`
`The paragraph in Bachmann from which Professor LaViola quotes
`
`reads as follows, in full:
`
`By mounting a plurality of sensors on a body, the posture of the body
`can be determined and tracked. Sensors constructed in accordance
`with the principles of the present invention can be used to track
`motion and orientation of simple rigid bodies as long as they are
`made of non-magnetic materials. Examples include, but are not
`limited to hand-held devices, swords, pistols, or simulated weapons.
`However, the inventors contemplate using the principles of the
`present invention to track the posture of articulated rigid objects, in
`one example, human bodies. Such articulated rigid bodies feature a
`plurality of segments interconnected by a plurality of joints. Each of
`the segments can correspond to, for example, limbs and extremities
`such as head, hands, forearms, legs, feet, portions of the torso, and
`so on. The joints corresponding to wrist, elbow, shoulder, neck,
`backbone, pelvis, knees, ankles, and so on. The inventors
`contemplate the application of these principles to other articulated
`rigid body embodiments. For example, non-magnetic prosthetic
`devices, robot arms, or other machinery can by tracked in accordance
`with the principles of the present invention. Additionally, animal
`body motion can be tracked using such devices.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`(Ex. 1004, 13:42-63).
`
`6.
`
`In my opinion, it is clear from the passage above that Bachmann’s
`
`reference to device “made of non-magnetic materials” means that that the device
`
`should not be “made of” materials that produce a significant magnetic field, relative to
`
`the Earth’s magnetic field. The purpose of Bachmann’s magnetic sensors is to
`
`measure the Earth’s magnetic field. (Ex. 1004, 5:11-20). Magnetic materials in a
`
`smartphone would not distort this field in a manner which makes measurement of the
`
`Earth’s magnetic field significantly less accurate.
`
`7.
`
`“Made of” is a strong statement, and implies a device encased in a
`
`magnetic housing or something similar. For example, among the things Bachmann
`
`considers made of “non-magnetic materials” are “handheld devices” (Ex. 1004,
`
`13:48), which includes certain cell phones and small computing devices containing
`
`speakers, as well as “prosthetic devices, robot arms, or other machinery” (Ex.
`
`1004, 13:60). Bachmann also notes that the orientation of pistols and swords can
`
`be tracked (which Bachmann distinguishes from “simulated weapons”). (Ex. 1004,
`
`13:60). While such devices (handheld devices, prostheses, robotic arms,
`
`machinery, pistols and swords) can have steel in them, and in some cases nearly
`
`always have steel in them (pistols, robotic arms, machinery), they are not “made
`
`of” magnetic material in the sense explained by Bachmann.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`8.
`
`I disagree with the conclusion and many factual assertions in Professor
`
`LaViola’s statement that:
`
`All smartphones contain many magnets and magnetic materials.
`These include, inter alia, magnets in the phones’ speakers, and
`magnetic materials making up many internal steel and gold parts,
`digital compasses, and often the housings of the smartphones.
`
`(Ex. 2032, ¶28).
`
`9.
`
`Let me begin with one area of agreement. Here, Professor LaViola
`
`accurately states that smartphones have speakers, and it is true that audio speakers
`
`are constructed using small permanent magnets.
`
`10. However, the fields generated by such magnets would be negligible
`
`compared to that of the Earth’s magnetic field at the magnetic sensors. That is
`
`why many smartphones have both speakers and magnetic sensors. Furthermore,
`
`Professor LaViola is simply incorrect that Gold is a magnetic material, and many
`
`smartphones have plastic housings. A smartphone, for example, will not
`
`magnetically attract iron or other ferromagnetic materials in any perceptible way.
`
`11. A person of ordinary skill would not have been dissuaded from using
`
`a method like Bachmann’s for sensor fusion in a smartphone. The problem of
`
`magnetic interference based on magnetic components of a smartphone was simply
`
`not significant. This is demonstrated by the fact that people did in fact use
`
`magnetic sensors in smartphones. Withanawasam, for example, teaches that:
`5
`
`

`

`Mobile devices such as personal navigation devices (PND) and smart
`phones typically have some form of navigation and map orientation
`application. These mobile devices often utilize a magnetic compass
`that have to work even when the device is not held level, which
`requires
`a micro-electro-mechanical
`systems
`(MEMS)
`accelerometer or a gyroscope to be integrated with the magnetic
`sensors.
`
`(Ex. 1017, ¶0001). Also, the iPhone 3GS used magnetic sensors, and was first
`
`released in June of 2009. (Ex. 1045).1
`
`12. Furthermore, neither the ’438 patent nor the ’978 patent teaches any
`
`way of dealing with interference that supposedly could be caused by using
`
`magnetic sensors in a smartphone. This indicates that the inventors did not
`
`consider it to be a problem.
`
`13. This declaration and my opinions herein are made to the best of my
`
`knowledge and understanding, and based on the material available to me, at the
`
`time of signing this declaration. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws
`
`of the United States of America that all statements made of my own knowledge are
`
`true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.
`
`
`1 https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2009/06/08Apple-Announces-the-New-
`
`iPhone-3GS-The-Fastest-Most-Powerful-iPhone-Yet/
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`I understand that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or
`
`imprisonment, or both (18 U.S.C. 1001) and may jeopardize the validity of the
`
`application or any patent iSSuing thereen.
`
`Date:
`
`Q’ZAX 2-6/9?
`
`A
`
`Signed:
`
`9E .— 2Z2,
`
`_
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket