`U.S. Pat. No. 8,552,978
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`GOOGLE LLC, ZTE (USA), INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`LG ELECTRONICS INC., HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC.,
`HUAWEI DEVICE CO. LTD., HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD.,
`HUAWEI DEVICE (DONGGUAN) CO. LTD.,
`HUAWEI INVESTMENT & HOLDING CO. LTD.,
`HUAWEI TECH. INVESTMENT CO. LTD., and
`HUAWEI DEVICE (HONG KONG) CO. LTD.,
`
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`Cywee Group Ltd.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(record) Patent Owner
`
`IPR2018-01257
`
`Patent No. 8,552,978
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01257
`U.S. Pat. No. 8,552,978
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner Google LLC (“Petitioner”) hereby
`
`requests oral argument, currently scheduled for September 13, 2019. Because of the
`
`substantial overlap between the two cases, Petitioner agrees with Patent Owner that
`
`oral argument for this IPR should be combined with that for co-pending IPR2018-
`
`01258, regarding U.S. Patent 8,441,438, for which a separate request for oral
`
`argument is being concurrently submitted. A combined hearing would avoid the
`
`need to repeat argument on certain issues.
`
`Petitioner believes, however, that 100 minutes per side may be excessive,
`
`given the overlap between the two cases. Petitioner thus requests that each side have
`
`70 minutes total in a combined hearing, or 45 minutes total if argument are held
`
`separately.
`
`Petitioner requests argument on any issues present in the two proceedings,
`
`including the following issues and all subsidiary issues:
`
`(1) Obviousness of claims 10 and 12 of the ’978 patent and claims 1 and 3-5
`
`’438 patent over Zhang in view of Bachmann;
`
`(2) obviousness of claims 10 and 12 of the ’978 patent over Liberty in view
`
`of Bachmann;
`
`(3) obviousness of the proposed amended claims over Withanawasam and
`
`Bachmann and/or the knowledge of a person of skill in the art;
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01257
`U.S. Pat. No. 8,552,978
`(4) whether proposed amended claims are procedurally proper, are entitled to
`
`the benefit of earlier filing dates, and are supported by their specifications;
`
`(5) any motions to exclude evidence filed by either party;
`
`(6) the propriety of arguments made by Patent Owner in its sur-replies to the
`
`Petitions;
`
`(7) the Patent Owner’s challenge to the RPI designation and privity issues;
`
`and
`
`(8) any issues that arise from filings made after this date.
`
`Petitioner requests that the Board provide audio-visual equipment to display
`
`exhibits and demonstrative exhibits, including a projector to be connected to a laptop
`
`and a screen for displaying documents.
`
`
`Date: Monday, August 12, 2019
`
`/Matthew A. Smith/ (RN 49,003)
`Matthew A. Smith
`SMITH BALUCH LLP
`1100 Alma St., Ste 109
`Menlo Park, CA
`(202) 669-6207
`smith@smithbaluch.com
`
`Counsel for Petitioner Google LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01257
`U.S. Pat. No. 8,552,978
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing Stipulation Modifying
`
`Scheduling Order was served by electronic mail on Monday, August 12, 2019, on
`
`all counsel of record at the United States Patent & Trademark Office.
`
`
` Date: August 12, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Matthew A. Smith/ (RN 49,003)
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
