throbber
Paper No. _
`Filed: August _, 2019
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`GOOGLE LLC, ZTE (USA), INC.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`
`LG ELECTRONICS INC., HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC.,
`
`HUAWEI DEVICE CO. LTD., HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD.,
`
`HUAWEI DEVICE (DONGGUAN) CO. LTD.,
`HUAWEI INVESTMENT & HOLDING CO. LTD.,
`
`HUAWEI TECH. INVESTMENT CO. LTD., and
`HUAWEI DEVICE (HONG KONG) CO. LTD.,
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`CYWEE GROUP LTD.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2018-01257 (Patent 8,552,978 B2)
`Case IPR2018-01258 (Patent 8,441,438 B2)
`
`DECLARATION OF COLLIN W. PARK
`
`GOOGLE 1038
`GOOGLE 1038
`
`

`

`Declaration of Collin W. Park
`
`1.
`
`My name is Collin W. Park.
`
`I am a partner with Morgan, Lewis &
`
`Bockius LLP (“Morgan Lewis”). I am designated as lead counsel for Petitioner
`
`LG Electronics Inc. (“LGE”) in IPR2019-00559, IPR2019—00560, and IPR2019-
`
`01203. I coordinated the preparation and filing of LGE’s joinder petitions in
`
`IPR2019-00559, 00560, and 01203 (collectively, “the LGE Joinder Petitions”). I
`
`have personal knowledge of all aspects of the preparation and filing of the LGE
`
`Joinder Petitions.
`
`2.
`
`LGE’s joinder petition and exhibits in IPR2019-005 59 (“the LGE 559
`
`Petition”) are substantially identical to Google LLC’s petition and exhibits in
`
`IPR2018—01258, to which the LGE 559 Petition sought to be joined. Filed
`
`contemporaneously with the LGE 559 Petition was a motion for joinder with
`
`IPR2018-01258. On July 12, 2019, the Board instituted IPR2019-00559 and
`
`joined it with IPR2018—01258, as requested. IPR2019—005 59, Paper No. 21.
`
`3.
`
`LGE’s joinder petition and exhibits in IPR2019-00560 (“the LGE 560
`
`Petition”) are substantially identical to Google’s petition and exhibits in IPR2018—
`
`0125 7, to which the LGE 560 Petition sought to be joined. Filed
`
`contemporaneously with the LGE 560 Petition was a motion for joinder with
`
`IPR2018-01257. On July 12, 2019, the Board instituted IPR2019—00560 and
`
`joined it with IPR2018-01257, as requested. IPR2019-00560, Paper No. 9.
`
`

`

`Declaration of Collin W. Park
`
`4.
`
`The LGE 559 Petition includes the following statement as to the Real—
`
`Parties-In—Interest (“RPIs”) of that petition:
`
`The real-parties—in—interest are LG Electronics Inc., and LG
`
`Electronics U.S.A., Inc. Petitioner further identifies as real-parties-
`
`in—interest the parties identified in IPR2018—01258 (to which this
`
`petition seeks joinder): Google LLC, Huawei Device USA, Inc.,
`
`Huawei Device Co. Ltd., Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., Huawei
`
`Device (Dongguan) Co. Ltd., Huawei Investment & Holding Co. Ltd.,
`
`Huawei Tech. Investment Co. Ltd., Huawei Device (Hong Kong) Co.
`
`Ltd.
`
`IPR2019-00559, Paper No. 13 at 5 (footnote omitted).
`
`5.
`
`The LGE 560 Petition includes the following statement as to the RPIs
`
`of that petition:
`
`The real-parties—in-interest for this petition are LG Electronics Inc.
`
`and LG Electronics USA, Inc. Petitioner further identifies as real-
`
`parties-in—interest the parties identified in IPR2018-01257 (to which
`
`this petition seeks joinder): Google LLC, Huawei Device USA, Inc.,
`
`Huawei Device Co. Ltd., Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., Huawei
`
`Device (Dongguan) Co. Ltd., Huawei Investment & Holding Co. Ltd.,
`
`

`

`Declaration of Collin W. Park
`
`Huawei Tech. Investment Co. Ltd., Huawei Device (Hong Kong) Co.
`
`Ltd.
`
`IPR2019—00560, Paper No. l at 3 (footnote omitted).
`
`6.
`
`As reflected above, the structure of each of the RPI statements
`
`includes two components. The first sentence identified the RPIs for the LGE 559
`
`and 560 Petitions as these petitions stood on their own. Specifically, these RPIs
`
`are: LG Electronics Inc. (“LGE”) and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.
`
`(“LGEUS”). No other party financed or controlled in any way the preparation and
`
`filing of the LGE 559 and 560 Petitions.
`
`7.
`
`The second sentence of the above RPI statements was intended—as
`
`reflected by the sentence itself (“to which this petition seeks joinder”)——to be a
`
`separate statement from the first sentence above to identify the entities already
`
`identified as RPIs in IPR2018—01257 and 01258 (collectively, “the Google
`
`IPRs”). These Google and Huawei entities were identified as RPIs for the petitions
`
`seeking joinder solely because those entities had already been identified as RPIs in
`
`the Google IPRs, to which the LGE 5 59 and 560 Petitions sought to be joined, and
`
`for no other reason.
`
`8.
`
`LGE filed another joinder petition in IPR2019-01203 (“the LGE 1203
`
`Petition”), which sought joinder to related IPR2019-00143 filed by ZTE (USA),
`
`Inc., on the same patent—US. Patent No. 8,441,438 B2—as IPR2018-1258 filed
`
`

`

`Declaration of Collin W. Park
`
`by Google. As was the case for the LGE 559 and 560 Petitions seeking joinder to
`
`the Google Petitions, the LGE 1203 Petition included the following RPI statement:
`
`The real-parties-in—interest for this Petition are LG Electronics Inc.
`
`and LG Electronics USA, Inc. Petitioner further identifies as real-
`
`parties—in—interest the parties identified in IPR2019-00143 (to which
`
`this petition seeks joinder): ZTE (USA), Inc. and ZTE Corporation.
`
`IPR2019-01203, Paper No. 2 at l (footnote omitted).
`
`9.
`
`Here, just as was the case with the RPI statements in the LGE 559 and
`
`560 Petitions seeking joinder to the Google IPRs, the first sentence identified the
`
`RPIs for the LGE 1203 Petition as the petition stood on its own: LGE and LGEUS.
`
`Again, no other party financed or controlled in any way the preparation and filing
`
`of the LGE 1203 Petition.
`
`10.
`
`The second sentence identified ZTE (USA), Inc. and ZTE Corporation
`
`which had already been identified as RPIs in IPR2019-00143 (“the ZTE IPR”), to
`
`which the LGE 1203 Petition sought joinder. Again, these ZTE entities were
`
`identified as RPIs for the petition seeking joinder solely because those entities had
`
`already been identified as RPIs in the ZTE IPR, to which the LGE 1203 Petition
`
`sought to be joined, and for no other reason. The Google and Huawei entities were
`
`not identified here because they were not RPIs in the ZTE IPR to which the LGE
`
`1203 Petition sought to join. Similarly, the ZTE entities were not identified as
`
`

`

`Declaration of Collin W. Park
`
`RPIs in the LGE 559 and 560 Petitions because they were not RPIs in the Google
`
`IPRs to which the LGE 559 and 560 Petitions sought to join. Our firm has
`
`followed a similar approach (of identifying the RPIs listed on the substantively
`
`identical petition with which joinder is sought) in other joinder petitions. See,
`
`IPR2017-Ol617, IPR2017-01682, IPR2017-01808.
`
`11.
`
`The statements herein do not, and are not intended in any way to,
`
`disclose any attomey-client communication or any other privileged information, or
`
`waive any attorney-client privilege or any other privilege.
`
`12.
`
`I declare under the penalty of perjury that all statements here are true
`
`to the best of my knowledge.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Dated: August 8, 2019
`
`By: GUI/k W OWZL
`
`Collin W. Park
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket