throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`GOOGLE LLC, ZTE (USA), INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`LG ELECTRONICS INC., HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC.,
`HUAWEI DEVICE CO. LTD., HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD.,
`HUAWEI DEVICE (DONGGUAN) CO. LTD.,
`HUAWEI INVESTMENT & HOLDING CO. LTD.,
`HUAWEI TECH. INVESTMENT CO. LTD., and
`HUAWEI DEVICE (HONG KONG) CO. LTD.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Cywee Group Ltd.
`
`(record) Patent Owner
`
`IPR2018-01257
`
`Patent No. 8,552,978
`
`
`
`PETITIONER GOOGLE’S MOTION TO SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2018-01257
`Patent No. 8,552,978
`
`
`Petitioner Google LLC (“Google”) requests that footnote 1 of its
`
`Opposition to Patent Owner’s Motion to Terminate (“Opposition”) be sealed
`
`under 37 C.F.R. § 42.55. Good cause to seal exists because the redaction is very
`
`limited and seeks to protect certain sensitive, non-public information that a
`
`business would not make public.
`
`I.
`
`GOVERNING RULES AND PTAB GUIDANCE
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(1), the default rule is that all papers filed in an
`
`inter partes review are open and available for access by the public, but a party
`
`may file a concurrent motion to seal and the information at issue is sealed pending
`
`the outcome of the motion.
`
`Similarly, 37 C.F.R. § 42.14 provides:
`
`The record of a proceeding, including documents
`and things, shall be made available to the public, except as
`otherwise ordered. A party intending a document or thing
`to be sealed shall file a motion to seal concurrent with the
`filing of the document or thing to be sealed. The document
`or thing shall be provisionally sealed on receipt of the
`motion and remain so pending the outcome of the decision
`on the motion.
`
`It is, however, only “confidential information” that is protected from
`
`disclosure. 35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(7) (“The Director shall prescribe regulations …
`
`providing for protective orders governing the exchange and submission of
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2018-01257
`Patent No. 8,552,978
`
`confidential information”). In that regard, the Office Trial Practice Guide, 77
`
`Fed. Reg. 48756, 48760 (Aug. 14, 2012) provides:
`
`The rules aim to strike a balance between the
`public’s
`interest
`in maintaining a complete and
`understandable file history and the parties’ interest in
`protecting truly sensitive information.
`* * *
`
`Information: The
`Confidential
`identify
`rules
`confidential information in a manner consistent with
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1)(G), which
`provides for protective orders for trade secret or other
`confidential
`research, development, or commercial
`information. § 42.54.
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.55, a “petitioner filing confidential information with
`
`a petition may, concurrent with the filing of the petition, file a motion to seal with
`
`a proposed protective order as to the confidential information.”
`
`II.
`
`IDENTIFICATION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`The confidential information that Google moves to seal consists of internal
`
`corporate policies and business practices. Specifically, footnote 1 of the
`
`Opposition contains sensitive internal business information pertaining to the
`
`existence or non-existence of certain legal arrangements and/or business
`
`relationships. Petitioner certifies that the full extent of this information has not
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2018-01257
`Patent No. 8,552,978
`
`been published or otherwise been made public.
`
`III. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR SEALING THE CONFIDENTIAL
`INFORMATION
`
`The Board routinely seals confidential, internal and sensitive business
`
`information. See, e.g., Tandus Flooring, Inc. v. Interface, Inc., IPR2013-00333,
`
`Paper 60 (P.T.A.B. Aug. 8, 2014). Here, the information contained in footnote 1
`
`of the Opposition consists of confidential, internal, and sensitive business
`
`information. Good cause exists to seal and keep this information confidential
`
`because the extent of the redaction is very limited and because the information
`
`would be valuable to competitors and harmful to Google if made public.
`
`Accordingly, as in Tandus, the Board should seal and keep this information
`
`confidential.
`
`IV. PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER
`Counsel for Google have made good faith attempts to agree to a Protective
`
`Order with counsel for CyWee. Although both parties have conferred and are in
`
`general agreement regarding the need to modify the Default Protective Order by
`
`establishing an Outside-Counsel-Only category of protection (which would
`
`govern both CyWee’s Exhibit 2031, as well as footnote 1 of Google’s
`
`Opposition), the parties remain in negotiations over the precise scope of the
`
`modifications. Google will promptly confer with CyWee and submit a proposed
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2018-01257
`Patent No. 8,552,978
`
`Protective Order for this matter. Until that time, Google requests that footnote 1
`
`of the Opposition remain sealed.
`
`Dated: August 9, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Andrew S. Baluch/
`Andrew S. Baluch (Reg. No. 57,503)
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`IPR2018-01257
`Patent No. 8,552,978
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing Motion to Seal was served
`
`by electronic mail on August 9, 2019, on all counsel of record at the USPTO having
`
`the following addresses:
`
`Counsel for CyWee:
`Jay Kesan
`
`jay@jaykesan.com;
`Cecil Key
`
`cecil@keyiplaw.com
`Ari Rafilson
`arafilson@shorechan.com;
`Michael Shore
`mshore@ShoreChan.com
`
`Counsel for ZTE:
`James R. Sobieraj jsobierah@brinksgilson.com
`Yeuzhong Feng
`yfeng@brinksgilson.com
`Andrea Shoffstall ashoffstall@brinksgilson.com
`ZTE_CyweeIPRs@brinksgilson.com
`
`
`Counsel for Samsung:
`Naveen Modi
`Chetan Bansal
`
`PH-Samsung-Cywee-IPR@paulhastings.com
`
`
`Counsel for LG:
`Collin Park
`Andrew Devkar
`Jeremy Peterson
`Adam Brooke
`
`collin.park@morganlewis.com
`andrew.devkar@morganlewis.com
`jeremy.peterson@morganlewis.com
`adam.brooke@morganlewis.com
`MLB_CyweevsLGE@morganlewis.com
`
`Counsel for Huawei:
`Kristopher L. Reed HuaweiCywee@kilpatricktownsend.com
`Benjamin M. Kleinman
`Norris P. Boothe
`
`Dated: August 9, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Andrew S. Baluch/
`Andrew S. Baluch (Reg. No. 57,503)
`
`6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket