throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Management Gaming on a Computer Mediated Conferencing System:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A Case of Collaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing
`
`
`
`
`
`Enrico Y. P. Hsu
`
`
`
`
`Ramapo College of New Jersey
`
`
`
`
`
`Abstract
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Effective
`collaborative
`for
`is
`essential
`learning
`
`
`
`management
`education.
`are
`skills
`Interpersonal
`
`
`
`
`
`A computer mediated
`important.
`particularly
`
`
`
`
`
`augmented with Virtual
`system,
`communication
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Classroom (R) software, was used in conjunction with a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`micro-computer based management game. Results of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the experiment,
`in terms of game performance, and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`student group learning experience, were encouraging.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Further experimentation is needed to firmly establish the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`significance of this experiential learning method.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Starr Roxanne Hiltz,
`
`
`
`
`New Jersey Institute of Technology
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`room. "Read" is a way of handing out lengthy reading
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`assignments. "Response" is a way of asking students for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`their answers or opinions. "Selection" serves to give the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`students to pick a topic or role among those available to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`"Decision support" is used to facilitate the
`them.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`students to contribute their input for group decision.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Virtual Classroom (R) also includes a set of instructional
`
`
`
`
`
`
`management tools, such as giving a quiz, maintaining a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`grade book, etc. The software has been used by a small
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`number of pilot courses and shows positive results (Hiltz,
`
`1989).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Recently, the US educational system has been widely
`
`
`
`
`
`seen as deficient at teaching job-related skills. Part of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the deficiency lies in obsolete or irrelevant course
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`material, but another part lies in the very structure of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the US educational system itself. For example, the US
`
`
`
`
`
`
`educational system rewards individual achievement at
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the expense of a nearly complete neglect of collective
`achievement. The assignment of individual grades and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the "curving" of grades discourages students from sharing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hard-won insights on difficult
`topics with classmates,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`especially ones who are not already close friends. This
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`paper addresses the deficiency in teaching collaborative
`skills in the education of managers.
`In management,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`interpersonal skills, informational skills and decisional
`Indeed,
`are
`all of collaborative nature.
`skills
`
`
`
`
`
`
`collaboration under proper
`leadership to achieve
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`common goals is the very essence of good management.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Collaborative learning has been known under many
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`other labels in the educational
`literature,
`including
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`"cooperative learning, group learning, collective learning,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`study circles, team learning..." [Benton and Garth, 1983,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`It includes a process of group conversation and
`p. 2].
`
`activity which is guided by a faculty member who.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`structures tasks and activities and offers expertise.
`Its
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`that
`basic premise is
`learning involves the "active
`construction" of knowledge by putting new ideas into
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`words and receiving the reactions of others to these
`
`
`
`
`formulations. Additional structured communication
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`provided by Computer Mediated Communication
`systems facilites Collaborative Learning at college level.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Management games have long been studied for teaching
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`effectiveness [Greenlaw and Wyman, 1973; Wolfe,
`1985]. The results were inconclusive. However, by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`re-analyzing the same data compiled by Greenlaw and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1. Introduction
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This is a report on an on-going experiment [Hsu and
`
`
`
`
`
`Geithman, 1988], in teaching collaborative managerial
`
`
`
`
`
`a Virtual
`through
`simulation—gaming
`in
`skills
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Previous papers [Hiltz, 1986, 1988a]
`Classroom(R).
`described the Virtual Classroom(R) as a teaching and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`learning environment
`located within a computer
`mediated communication system. Accessible around the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`clock and around the world, it was designed to support
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`for
`"collaborative
`learning"
`distance
`education,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`particularly at the college level. There are "spaces" and
`
`
`
`
`software support for lectures, class discussions, doing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`assignments (individuallyor collaboratively), private
`communication with the instructor or other students,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`taking tests, chatting informally in the student center or
`
`
`
`"cafe", and more.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is a set of software
`Briefly, Virtual Classroom (R)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`designed for implementation on various a family of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`proprietary Computer Mediated Conferencing systems
`called Electronic Information Exchange Systems (EIES),
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`developed and implemented at New Jersey Institute of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Technology. The EIES systems consist of these basic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`facilities: mail, conference, notebook, directory, and
`notifications. Virtual Classroom (R) software expands
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the capability of conference module through "read",
`“response", “selection" and “decision support" activities,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`designed to mimic the activities in a conventional class
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0073-1129/91/0000/0367$01.00 © 1991 IEEE
`
`
`
`
`
`367
`
`Petitioner Valve - Ex. 1020, Page 367
`
`Petitioner Riot Games, Inc. - EX. 1020, p. 367
`
`Petitioner Riot Games, Inc. - Ex. 1020, p. 367
`
`Petitioner Valve - Ex. 1020, Page 367
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Wyman and by Wolfe, with an eye towards the teaching
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of collaborative skills, Hsu [1989] demonstrated the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`clearly positive effects of group interaction on student
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`performance in the playing of management games
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[1989]. The emphasis was on the group interaction
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`benefits of game playing. Here we further buttress the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`conclusions of Hsu, by comparing the game performance
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`groups
`student
`using a
`computer mediated
`of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`conferencing system to that of student groups without
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`such a conferencing system. We show that computer
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`conferencing increases the group interaction benefits of
`
`
`
`game playing. The student groups play better when
`supported by the Virtual Classroom(R) software. We
`also show that group cohesion and stability are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`enhanced, as well.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Virtual Classroom project includes the development
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of software structures and pedagogical
`techniques to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`enhance the effectiveness of computer conferencing for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the delivery of college level education, and the
`evaluation of the effectiveness of these innovations. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`research methodology is based on uasi-experimental
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`designs which use matched sections 0 the same courses,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`delivered in various modes
`[Hiltz, 1988a, 1988b].
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Students who have used the Virtual Classroom(R), rate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`it, on the average, as delivering a more convenient and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`better quality education than the traditional classroom.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mastery of material as measured by grades was as good
`
`
`or better than that obtained by students in traditional
`classes. These outcomes established the viability of the
`Virtual Classroom(R)
`as mode
`delivery
`of
`of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`college-level courses.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2. Review of the Gaming Environment
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`To encourage collaboration and group identification
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`among students, it is necessary that they associate with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`each other as much as possible, and that they strive
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`towards a common goal. In addition it is desirable that
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the instructor be able to monitor the exchanges among
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`students. Physical meetings of groups of students outside
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of class are difficult to arrange, given the diversity of
`in terms of course loads, schedules and
`students
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`interests.
`This is even more problematic in urban
`schools, where many students work part-time and there
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is not a strong spirit of school identification.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Virtual Classroom(R)
`is ideally suited for such a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`situation. Students are grouped into teams to play a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`management game. Meetings among team members,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`however, need not be physical, nor must the members
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`schedule special
`times for meetings.
`Students may
`
`
`
`access the computer conferencing system whenever it is
`convenient
`them, and conduct business
`most
`for
`discussions. Additionally, the instructor can read all of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the cements made.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1.
`
`
`
`Turoff, et al.[1989], distinguish seven default conference
`
`
`
`
`
`structures:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Discussion Conference: Structured to optimize
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`general purpose discussion by active groups of up
`to fifty or more individuals.
`Seminar Conference: Designed to facilitate
`learning oriented seminars and the "Virtual
`
`2.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`368
`
`
`
`3.
`
`
`4.
`
`
`
`5.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`
`
`
`
`3.
`
`
`
`
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`
`Classroom."
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Information Exchange: Optimized for very large
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(hundreds) engaged in unpredictable
`groups
`information exchange.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`various
`Project Management:
`Incorporates
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tracking, selection, and organizing features to
`maintain awareness of modifications, milestones,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`status, and task assignments that are taking place.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Composition Notebook: Allows a high degree of
`
`
`selective roles in different designated portions of
`the conference, and tracks the updates and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`changes being made to the generation of a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`collaborative document.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Data Collection Conference: Designed for the
`organization of structured data, and the tracking
`
`
`
`
`and validation of data changes for a group
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`building and utilizing a collaborative data base.
`
`
`Simulation-Game Conference: Structured to allow
`
`
`
`
`
`a group to carry out a role playing, even-oriented
`scenario game.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In our experiment, we used the Simulation—Game
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Conference option, supplemented by the Discussion
`Conference structure. A Simulation-Game Conference
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`allows a group to carry out a role-playing, event-oriented
`
`
`
`
`
`scenario game.
`The game director can control all
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`communication channels and the conditions and timing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`for events to occur. In order to simplify and standardize
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the scenarios, 3 microcomputer based management game
`
`
`
`
`
`
`was used to augment
`the role playing of the group
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`members. In this sense, the management game served
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`as a model to generate operating results based on a set
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of decision inputs and the Simulation-Game Conference
`
`provides the forum for the group members to formulate
`and agree on the decision inputs. The two technologies
`
`
`
`
`
`thus complement each other in a group collaboration
`envrronment.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Among the many published management games,
`"Business Simulator" by Reality Technologies, Inc. was
`selected for the following reasons:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The game is relatively inexpensive so that all
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`students can afford to own it.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The game is playable individually. This way the
`
`
`
`
`
`students can learn business concepts at home and
`
`
`
`
`
`at their own individual paces. The students can
`also use the game to predict probable outcbmes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of various decision parameters before submitting
`
`
`
`
`these decisions to their group.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The game can be played by assigning functional
`
`
`
`
`
`roles to members of a group,
`thus requiring
`collaboration within the group.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The game allows for competition between groups,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`thereby stimulating greater student interest.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The game is user friendly.
`It does not require
`
`much computer expertise to run. It provides on
`line help and tutorial. Furthermore, it includes a
`number of color charts to show the performance
`results.
`
`Petitioner Valve - Ex. 1020, Page 368
`
`Petitioner Riot Games, Inc. - EX. 1020, p. 368
`
`Petitioner Riot Games, Inc. - Ex. 1020, p. 368
`
`Petitioner Valve - Ex. 1020, Page 368
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`3. The Experiment
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Four .sections of OS 471 Management Practices
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`particrpated in the current study. A total of fifty-three
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`students who completed the course were organized into
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`eighteen companies, each comprising two to four
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`students with an average of three. "Company" is the unit
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of analySIs of our experiment. The assigned product for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`all Simulated companies was a household robot (Pet-
`Bots) that would do most domestic chores.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Three sections had access to the Virtual Classroom on
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EIESZ at NJIT: one larger section used the basic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`facilities of the Virtual Classroom on EIESZ and two
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the
`smaller sections used all
`advanced features on
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EIESZ plus
`readily available off-line productivity
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`software, such spreadsheet and data base system. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fourth section, serving as the control group did not have
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`access to EIESZ at all. Thus we have three treatments:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Control Category with no access to Virtual
`1.
`
`Classroom,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Experimental Category I with regular Virtual
`2.
`
`
`
`Classroom facilities, and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Experimental Category 11 using
`3.
`regularVirtual
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Classroom facilities,the full
`features of the EIESZ
`
`
`
`
`
`
`conferencing system plus
`such off-line productivity
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`software as spreadsheet and data base management
`
`system.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the students were randomly
`Within each category,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`divided into six groups of three to four students. Each
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`group had a name and an organizational structure,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`consisting of a CEO, a Financial Officer, an Operations
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Chief and a Marketing Executive. A Game Playing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Procedure manual was distributed at the beginning of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the semester, detailing the responsibilities of the various
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`officers and the format of an end-of-semester summary
`
`report.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Three phases of the life cycle of a business were
`
`
`
`
`
`simulated:
`start-up, growth, and independence. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`decisions to be made in each phase are shown in Figure
`
`1.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`competes
`against
`three
`and against
`each other
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`companies played by the computer. Each week student
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`company must submit their quantitative decisions on the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`items listed in Fig. 1. Members of each company must
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`study the results of last year operation, economic trend
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and operational policies, and run the game program
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`independently by guessing how their competing company
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`might play their hand. Then company members discuss
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pros and cons of the quantitative decisions as put
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`forward. Since the members play different functional
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`roles: manufacturing, marketing and finance, they tend
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to focus on their respective functional area more than
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the other areas. However, they have a common goal of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`optimizing the operating results: units sold, back orders,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ending inventory, market share, operating income,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`income tax, net income, CEO’s net worth, company book
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`value, etc.
`Here collaboration comes
`into play.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Hopefully they converge toward a single set of numbers.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In any case, before the weekly deadline, CEO must
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`make final decision.
`In the first
`treatment of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`experiment, CEO’s submit their decisions on a piece of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`paper. The instructor runs the game and saves the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`results on a diskette available for the students to copy.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In the second and third treatment, they declare these
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`numbers in their company’s private conference. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`instructor, being an observer of all the conferences, picks
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`up decisions from two competing companies and runs
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the game officially. The results of the game for the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`current year are then published in the Managers’ Lounge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(class conference).
`In the second treatment of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`experiment, some key results were published. This
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`method requires more of instructor’s time in extracting
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the results from the game and inputting into the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`conference.
`In the third treatment,
`the instructor
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`transfers a binary file containing all the results of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`game through "binary file transfer" facility of the EIESZ
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`system. Students can download this file onto their own
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`diskette and play the next year game based on current
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`year results. The game was played for nine weeks,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`representing nine fiscal years. The performances of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`different companies were evaluated based on the final
`
`
`
`
`
`outcome of the ninth year.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The students also had access to the results of all other
`
`
`
`
`
`
`companies for comparison and reference. The key
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the
`results were recorded in a data base so that
`
`
`
`
`
`
`comparative results could be organized and published
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`from time to time. This practice proved to be useful in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`maintaining the interest and competitive spirits of all the
`
`groups.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The companies with access to CMC were assigned a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`group conference for the conduct of the simulated
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`business. Typical uses were the assignment of functional
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`roles, discussion of the logistics and scheduling of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`game-playing, formulation of general strategies of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`business, and review of operational
`Each
`results.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`student company discussed the results in its private
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the
`conference
`see whether
`outcomes met
`to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`expectations and to search for possible reasons for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`deviations. All students with CMC also participated in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`two other conferences: the Student Center for social
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`activities and the Managers’ Corner. for management
`
`
`related discussions.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Figure 1: Decisions in Business Simulatorm) Game
`
`Phase I: Startup - Phase fl]: Independence
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Price
` Advertising
`
`
`
`‘ Units
`Units
`Units
`i
`Factory Expansion
`Factory Expansion
`Ions Term Debt Sold
`14mg Term Debt Sold
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Common Stocks
`Common Stocls Issued
`
`
`
`
`Issued
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘
`
`—% Sales on Credit
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Sales Force Size
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Research a Development
`
`One Year Learn
`Supplier Payment Period
`
`
`Dividend
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Each student company is paired with another company
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`belonging to the same category or treatment. The pair
`
`
`
`
`369
`
`
`
`Petitioner Valve - Ex. 1020, Page 369
`
`Petitioner Riot Games, Inc. - EX. 1020, p. 369
`
`Petitioner Riot Games, Inc. - Ex. 1020, p. 369
`
`Petitioner Valve - Ex. 1020, Page 369
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Both the Student Center
`students without CMC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Conference and the Managers’ Corner Conference
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`played important roles in developing this camaraderie.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`One third of the students who used CMC asked to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`remain on the conference for further socialim‘ng with the
`
`
`
`
`
`instructor and the students of the next semester, some of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`whom selected these particular sections as a result of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`recommendations from the veterans. More importantly,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the average student with CMC clocked an average of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hours per week on one or another of the conferences
`outside of class time, while students without CMC met
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`less than one hour per week.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the discussion in the Managers’ Corner
`Much of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`conference related to the potential problems of on-the—
`job managers. For example, students discussed what to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`do if the boss "goofs off frequently." WK responded:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`"My boss goofs off a lot since he became a partner in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the design firm Iwork for. He also has a good sense
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of humor. so when he is goofing off I ask him ‘How
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`can I help You,Bob‘.7’ and he’ll tell me he’s not really
`
`
`
`
`
`doing anything and I’ll tell him that it sounds good to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`me and I want to do my fair share. Something like
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`this usually makes him self-conscious and he starts
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`looking for something productive to do. I think most
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`bosses got to be bosses by being responsible 'and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`capable (I said MOST OK?) and I think if you can
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`find some good natured way to point out to them that
`
`
`their goofing off
`affects you,
`their
`sense of
`responsibility should take over without causing too
`much trouble."
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A comparison of the American management style with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the Japanese proved an inexhaustible
`source of
`discussion, while hot debate took place over
`the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`economic relationship between West and East Germany.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Discussion in the group business conferences was serious
`and of similarly high quality. A comment by CA, the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CEO of FutureWave, represents a typical entry:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`"I agree with you about raising the price from $34 to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`$41. We don’t have enough production to compete
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at a low price so we might as well make like Hewlett
`Packard. This will result in a lower market share but
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`will maximize our profits until we are ready to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`expand. One suggestion: s end more on advertising.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Instead of $500K maybe 525K. Our sales will be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`targeted to a higher income bracket which has not
`
`heard of us or has regarded our goods as lower
`quality because of the lower price range. Good
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hunting!"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The groups with CMC also benefitted from greater
`
`
`
`
`
`
`group coordination and continuity in the face of real-life
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`disruptions. For example, 0A disappeared for a time
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and abandoned his prerogative of finalizing business
`decisions. LC and GB used all three conferences to
`plead for OA’s return by posting humorous comments:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`370
`
`Petitioner Valve - Ex. 1020, Page 370
`
`Petitioner Riot Games, Inc. - EX. 1020, p. 370
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`— l
`
`RohoTech
`%—l KJ&J
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`m
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The number of students and companies was too small
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`for results on all dependent variables to be statistically
`
`
`
`
`
`
`significant at the .05 level, but the results are consistently
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`those with
`the Virtual Classroom.
`in favor of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Experimental category 11 has just ended. Preliminary
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`analysis of the enhanced condition shows extreme
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`variance: the highest and lowest performances of all
`
`
`
`
`
`companies observed occurred.
`In depth analysis is
`required to identify the possible causes. Results shall be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`discussed in an update report.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A less tangible but perhaps more important measure of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the value of CMC in teaching collaborative managerial
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`skills is the camaraderie that developed in companies
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with access to CMC. As one of the questions on the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`final exam, the students were asked to list the names
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and nick names of the class members. The students who
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`used CMC knew the names of 83% their classmates,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`while the students without CMC scored only 67%. The
`students with CMC organized ski/skating trips and small
`parties, while nothing of the sort took place with the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Companies without access to CMC were dependent on
`
`
`face-to-face meetings or telephone or mail to conduct
`their communication.
`4. Results
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`indication that CMC improves student
`The clearest
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`learning of managerial skills is that the companies run
`
`
`
`
`
`
`by students with CMC performed dramatically better
`than companies run by students without CMC. We
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`defined three criteria and a composite index:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Composite Index = Profitability + ROA (Return on
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Assets) + ROE (Return on Equity)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`as measures to rank the performance of a company.
`The results of the final year operation of the simulated
`
`
`companies are shown in the following table.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Performahee Measures of smarts
`
`Cbuipmy’ Name -"_ it} Profitability '-
`
`Companies without access to Virtual Classroom on Eli-152
`
`
`— n2.9
` 1 7
`
`
`193
`25.5
`Robotron
`1 1.4
`
`6.1
`m-
`13.3
`_-—-_
`
`.—-H-
`“To
`L
`
`
`1 Average /
`
`
`Experimental category I with access to Virtual
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Riot Games, Inc. - Ex. 1020, p. 370
`
`Petitioner Valve - Ex. 1020, Page 370
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`"Hey 0A, did you get stuck in traffic again . We
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`missed you at the class today. We wanted to confer
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with you about the simulator but we will see you at
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`another time. GB." "0A, First of all, I’m extremely
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`gratified to hear that you are alive and well. I thought
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`maybe you had been swallowed up by a garbage truck
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`or something!!! Nice to hear from you!!!"
`"How
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`come you weren’t in class??? How come you don’t
`talk to us anymore??? Do we smell??? Are we
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`offensive??? C’mon, lets get together and talk about
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Year #4!!! GB and myself shared some thoughts this
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`morning, but as our CEO we would like to get your
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`thoughts on a plan of action. When you read this,
`
`answer me right away so we can get
`the ball
`rolling! ! !"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0A returned eventually to FutureWave (not, however,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`as CEO). He participated actively in the game and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`shared the
`the good performance of
`credit
`for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In fact, FutureWave was
`the top
`FutureWave.
`performer by all the objective measures.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JR, CEO of KJ&J, had a similar experience; however,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`he continued to maintain contact with his group through
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CMC. He was able to return to the game and resume
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`his responsibilities as CEO. Both examples show that
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CMC provides critical support for students who have
`been temporarily distracted from their duties.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In contrast, the CEO’s of Hysterical and RJM, both
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`companies without CMC, also vanished from their posts.
`Neither returned for the duration of the semester,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the
`Finally,
`prepare
`students
`CMC helped
`end-of-semester summary report. The groups that used
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CMC for the conduct of their business had the benefit
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of a complete record of the individual contributions of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the group members. The preparation of the report was
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`only a matter of editing the contents of the conference,
`while the groups without the benefit of CMC had to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`convene several meetings
`to assign the work and
`
`
`
`assemble the results.
`
`
`5. Concluding Remarks
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in
`We have shown that CMC is extremely helpful
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`teaching collaborative skills to management students.
`Simulated companies using the Virtual Classroom (R)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`structures within a computerized conferencing system
`
`
`
`
`
`
`achieved
`significantly
`profits,
`return
`higher
`on
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`investment and return on equity. It also provides a
`lifeline to students who become temporarily distracted
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`from their class responsibilities. An enhanced CMC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`system (Virtual Management Practices Laboratory or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Virtual Lab for short) with special features, such as
`on-line "forms," binary file transfer capability,
`role
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`playing sessions, incoming mail organizer functions, and
`"file cabinets" has made the advantages of computer
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mediated conferencing systems even more appealing in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the education of managers, since future managers will
`function in a more and more automated office
`
`environment.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`REFERENCES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Bouton, Clark and Russell Y. Garth (1983), "Learning
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in Groups. New Directions in Teaching and Learning",
`
`
`
`
`Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1983.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`"The
`Greenlaw, P. S. and F. P. Wyman (1973)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`teaching effectiveness of games in collegiate business
`
`
`
`
`
`
`courses. " Simulation and Games 4 (2): 259-264.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Hiltz, Starr Roxanne (1988a), "Leaming in a Virtual
`
`
`Classroom - A Virtual Classroom 0n EIES: Final
`
`
`
`
`
`Evaluation
`I," Computerized
`Report,
`Vol.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Conferencing and Communications Center, Research
`
`
`
`Report # 25, 1988.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Hiltz, Starr Roxanne (1988b), ”Teaching in a Virtual
`Classroom - A Virtual Classroom On EIES: Final
`
`
`
`
`
`Evaluation
`Report,
`2, " Computerized
`Vol.
`
`
`
`
`
`Conferencing and Communications Center, Research
`
`
`
`
`Report # 26, 1988.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Hiltz, Starr Roxanne (1989), "Collaborative Learning
`
`
`
`
`in a Virtual Classroom: Highlights of Findings,"
`
`
`
`
`Proceedings, Second Conference on Computer
`
`Supported Cooperative Work, Portland, Oregon,
`1989.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Hsu, Enrico (1989), "Role-Event Gaming Simulation
`in Management Education: A Conceptual Framework
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and Review", Simulation and Games, Vol. 20 No. 4,
`
`
`
`
`December, 1989. pp. 409-438.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Hsu, Enrico and D. 'I‘. Geithman (1988), 'Expen'ential
`Learning in Management Education: Virtual Lab’,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Management Games and Group Decision Support
`
`
`
`
`
`System," Proceedings of Sixth World Productivity
`Congress, September, 1988, pp. 507-531.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Turoff, Murray; John Foster; Starr Roxanne Hiltz and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Kenneth Ng (1989),
`”The TEIES Design and
`
`Objectives: Computer Mediated Communications and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Tailorability", Proceedings, Hawaii
`International
`
`Conference on System Sciences, January, 1989, pp
`403-411.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Wolfe, Joseph (1985) ’The

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket