PUBLIC VERSION
`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`WASHINGTON, D.C. 20436
`
`In the Matter of
`
`
`
`DEVICES AND RADIO FREQUENCY
`AND PROCESSING COMPONENTS
`
`
`'
`
`
`CERTAIN MOBILE ELECTRONIC
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-1065
`
`THEREOF
`
`INITIAL DETERMINATION AND RECOMMENDED DETERMINATION
`
`Administrative Law Judge Thomas B. Pender
`
`Pursuant to the not-ice of investigation, 82 Fed. Reg. 37899 (Aug. 14, 201?), this is the
`
`initial determination on violation and recommended determination on remedy and bonding in
`
`Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof;
`
`United States International Trade Commission Investigatiou No. 337-TA-1065.
`
`It is held that a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act, as amended, has occurred in the
`
`importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States
`
`after importation; of certain mobile electronic devices and radio frequency and processing
`
`components thereof, with respect to asserted claim 31 of US. Patent No. 9,535,490.
`
`(cid:42)(cid:79)(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:77)(cid:1)(cid:36)(cid:80)(cid:83)(cid:81)(cid:80)(cid:83)(cid:66)(cid:85)(cid:74)(cid:80)(cid:79)(cid:1)(cid:87)(cid:15)(cid:1)(cid:50)(cid:86)(cid:66)(cid:77)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:78)(cid:78)(cid:1)(cid:42)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:83)(cid:81)(cid:80)(cid:83)(cid:66)(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:69)
`Intel Corporation V. Qualcomm Incorporated
`(cid:42)(cid:49)(cid:51)(cid:19)(cid:17)(cid:18)(cid:25)(cid:14)(cid:17)(cid:18)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:17)
`IPR2018—01240
`(cid:38)(cid:89)(cid:73)(cid:74)(cid:67)(cid:74)(cid:85)(cid:1)(cid:19)(cid:17)(cid:17)(cid:18)(cid:13)(cid:1)(cid:81)(cid:15)(cid:18)
`Exhibit 2001, p.1
`
`

`

`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Page
`
`I.
`
`Background .......................................................................................................................... 1
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`D.
`
`Institution of the Investigation ................................................................................. l
`
`Procedural History ...................................................................................................2
`
`The Private Parties ................................................................................................... 3
`
`Ownership of the Asserted Patents ..........................................................................4
`
`II.
`
`Jurisdiction and Importation4
`
`111.
`
`The ’558 Patent .................................................................................................................... 5
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`Claim Construction .................................................................................................. 5
`
`Infringement............................................................................................................. 6
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`General Principles of Law ...........................................................................6
`
`The ’558 Accused Products ......................................................................... 8
`
`Claim 6 ......................................................................................................... 9
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`An apparatus for wireless communication, comprising: a
`power ampli tier operative to receive and amplify an input
`radio frequency (RF) signal and provide an output RF signal;
`and .................................................................................................... 9
`
`a supply generator operative to receive an envelope signal and
`a first supply voltage, to generate a boosted supply voltage
`having a higher voltage than the first supply voltage, and to
`generate a second supply voltage for the power amplifier
`based on the envelope signal and the boosted supply voltage, ........9
`
`wherein the supply generator incorporates an operational
`amplifier (op-amp) operative to receive the envelope signal
`and provide an amplified signal, .................................................... 10
`
`a driver operative to receive the amplified signal and provide a
`first control signal and a second control signal, ............................. 10
`
`(cid:42)(cid:79)(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:77)(cid:1)(cid:36)(cid:80)(cid:83)(cid:81)(cid:80)(cid:83)(cid:66)(cid:85)(cid:74)(cid:80)(cid:79)(cid:1)(cid:87)(cid:15)(cid:1)(cid:50)(cid:86)(cid:66)(cid:77)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:78)(cid:78)(cid:1)(cid:42)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:83)(cid:81)(cid:80)(cid:83)(cid:66)(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:69)(cid:1)
`Intel Corporation V. Qualcomm Incorporated
`(cid:42)(cid:49)(cid:51)(cid:19)(cid:17)(cid:18)(cid:25)(cid:14)(cid:17)(cid:18)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:17)
`IPR2018-01240
`(cid:38)(cid:89)(cid:73)(cid:74)(cid:67)(cid:74)(cid:85)(cid:1)(cid:19)(cid:17)(cid:17)(cid:18)(cid:13)(cid:1)(cid:81)(cid:15)(cid:19)
`Exhibit 2001, p.2
`
`

`

`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT’D)
`
`Page
`
`a P-channel metal oxide semiconductor (PMOS) transistor
`having a gate receiving a first control signal, a source
`receiving the boosted supply voltage or the first supply
`voltage, and a drain providing the second supply voltage, and ..... l 1
`
`an N-channel metal oxide semiconductor (NMOS) transistor
`having a gate receiving the second control signal, a drain
`providing the second supply voltage, and a source coupled to
`circuit ground................................................................................. 16
`
`4.
`
`Claim 7 ....................................................................................................... 18
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`The apparatus of claim 6, ............................................................... 18
`
`wherein the supply generator is operative to generate the
`second supply voltage based on the envelope signal and either
`the boosted supply voltage or the first supply voltage...................18
`
`C.
`
`Technical Prong .....................................................................................................20
`
`l.
`
`2.
`
`General Principles of Law .........................................................................20
`
`The ’558 Domestic Industry Products .......................................................22
`
`Claim 6 .......................................................................................................23
`
`a.
`
`An apparatus for wireless communication, comprising: a
`power amplifier operative to receive and amplify an input
`radio frequency (RF) signal and provide an output RF signal;
`and .................................................................................................. 23
`
`a supply generator operative to receive an envelope signal and
`a first supply voltage, to generate a boosted supply voltage
`having a higher voltage than the first supply voltage, and to
`generate a second supply voltage for the power amplifier
`based on the envelope signal and the boosted supply voltage, ......23
`
`wherein the supply generator incorporates an operational
`amplifier (op-amp) operative to receive the envelope signal
`and provide an amplified ‘signal, ....................................................24
`
`a driver operative to receive the amplified signal and provide a
`first control signal and a second control signal, ............................. 24
`
`11
`
`Intel Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated
`Intel Corporation V. Qualcomm Incorporated
`IPR2018-01240
`IPR2018—01240
`Exhibit 2001, p.3
`Exhibit 2001, p.3
`
`

`

`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT’D)
`
`Page
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`a P-channel metal oxide semiconductor (PMOS) transistor
`having a gate receiving a first control signal, a source
`receiving the boosted supply voltage or the first supply
`voltage, and a drain providing the second supply voltage, and .....24
`
`an N—channel metal oxide semiconductor (NMOS) transistor
`having a gate receiving the second control signal, a drain
`providing the second supply voltage, and a source coupled to
`circuit ground. ................................................................................26
`
`4.
`
`Claim T ....................................................................................................... 28
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`The apparatus of claim 6, ................................................................28
`
`wherein the supply generator is operative to generate the
`second supply voltage based on the envelope sigtal and either
`the boosted supply voltage or the first supply voltage................... 28
`
`D.
`
`Validity ..................................................................................................................28
`
`1.
`
`General Principles of Law ......................................................................... 28
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`Obviousness ................................................................................... 29
`
`Lack of a Written Description........................................................31
`
`Indefiniteness ................................................................................. 3 l
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`Conception and Reduction to Practice .......................................................32
`
`Kang: Obviousness ....................................................................................34
`
`Chu: Obviousness ...................................................................................... 35
`
`Secondary Considerations ..................................... _. .................................... 37
`
`Indefiniteness and Written Description ..................................................... 38
`
`IV.
`
`The ’936 Patent .................................................................................................................. 39
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`Claim Construction ................................................................................................ 40
`
`Infringement...........................................................................................................40
`
`iii
`
`Intel Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated
`Intel Corporation V. Qualcomm Incorporated
`IPR2018-01240
`IPR2018—01240
`Exhibit 2001, p.4
`Exhibit 2001, p.4
`
`

`

`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT’D)
`
`Page
`
`The ”936 Accused Products ....................................................................... 40
`
`Claim 19 ..................................................................................................... 41
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`c.
`
`f.
`
`g.
`
`A device comprising: a controller ..................................................41
`
`configured to receive a graphics instruction for execution
`within a programmable streaming processor, ................................41
`
`wherein the indication of the data precision is contained within
`the graphics instruction and ...........................................................42
`
`wherein the graphics instruction is a first executable
`instruction generated by a compiler that compiles graphics
`application instructions,42
`
`i.
`
`ii.
`
`Literal Infringement .......................................................... 42
`
`Doctrine of Equivalents .................................................... 45
`
`to receive an indication of a data precision for execution of the
`graphics instruction, and to receive a conversion instruction
`that, when executed by the programmable streaming
`processor, converts graphics data associated, with the graphics
`instruction, from a first data precision to converted graphics
`data having a second data precision, wherein the conversion
`instmction is different than the graphics instruction and
`wherein the conversion instruction is generated by the
`compiler; and .................................................................................48
`
`a plurality of execution units within the processor, .......................52
`
`wherein the controller is configured to select one of the
`execution units based on the indicated data precision and
`cause the selected execution unit to execute the graphics
`instruction with the indicated data precision using the
`converted graphics data associated with the graphics
`instruction.S2
`
`Claim 25 ..................................................................................................... 52
`
`at
`
`The device of claim 19, ..................................................................52
`
`iv
`
`Intel Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated
`Intel Corporation V. Qualcomm Incorporated
`IPR2018-01240
`IPR2018-01240
`Exhibit 2001, p.5
`Exhibit 2001, p.5
`
`

`

`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT’D)
`
`Page
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`wherein the plurality of execution units includes at least one
`full-precision execution unit and at least one half-precision
`execution unit, and .........................................................................53
`
`wherein when the indicated data precision for execution of the
`graphics instruction comprises a half precision, the controller
`is configured to shut down power to the at least one full-
`precision execution unit and cause the at least one half-
`precision execution unit to execute the graphics instruction
`using the graphics data. .................................................................. 53
`
`4.
`
`Claim 27 ..................................................................................................... 54
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`The device of claim 19, ..................................................................54
`
`wherein the device comprises a wireless communication
`device handset. ............................................................................... 54
`
`Technical Prong ........................................................................................... . .........55
`
`l.
`
`2.
`
`The ’936 Domestic Industry Products .......................................................55
`
`Claim 19 ..................................................................................................... 55
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`0.
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`A device comprising: a controller.................................................. 55
`
`configured to receive a graphics instruction for execution
`within a programmable streaming processor, ................................ 56
`
`wherein the indication of the data precision is contained within
`the graphics instruction and ...........................................................56
`
`wherein the graphics instruction is a first executable
`instruction generated by a compiler that cempiles graphics
`application instructions, .................................................................56
`
`to receive an indication of a data precision for execution of the
`graphics instruction, and to receive a conversion instruction
`that, when executed by the programmable streaming
`processor, converts graphics data associated, with the graphics
`instruction, from a first data precision to converted graphics
`data having a second data precision, wherein the conversion
`instruction is different than the graphics instruction and
`
`V
`
`Intel Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated
`Intel Corporation V. Qualcomm Incorporated
`IPR2018-01240
`IPR2018—01240
`Exhibit 2001, p.6
`Exhibit 2001, p.6
`
`

`

`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT’D)
`
`Page
`
`f.
`
`g.
`
`wherein the conversion instruction is generated by the
`compiler; and .................................................................................59
`
`a plurality of execution units within the processor,60
`
`wherein the controller is configured to select one of the
`execution units based on the indicated data precision and
`cause the selected execution unit to execute the graphics
`instruction with the indicated data precision using the
`converted graphics data associated with the graphics
`instruction. ..................................................................................... 61
`
`3.
`
`Claim2561
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`The device of claim 19, .................................................................. 61
`
`wherein the plurality of execution units includes at least one
`full—precision execution unit and at least one half-precision
`execution unit, and .........................................................................61
`
`wherein when the indicated data precision for execution of the
`graphics instruction comprises a half precision, the controller
`is configured to shut down power to the at least one filli-
`precision execution unit and cause the at least one half-
`prec-isiou execution unit to execute the graphics instruction
`using the graphicsdata62
`
`D-
`
`Validity ..................................................................................................................62
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`NVIDIA NV35 GPU: Anticipation ...........................................................62
`
`Sony PlayStation 3: Anticipation ...............................................................65
`
`NV3S and Holmer: Obviousness ............................................................... 6?
`
`PlayStation 3 and Holmer: Obviousncss....................................................69
`
`Secondary Considerations ..........................................................................70
`
`The =490 Patent .............................'.". ................................................................................... 71
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`Claim Construction ................................................................................................ 72
`
`Infringement.....................I......................................................................................72
`Intel Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated
`Intel Corporation V. Qualcomm Incorporated
`IPR2018-01240
`IPR2018-01240
`Exhibit 2001, p.7
`Exhibit 2001, p.7
`
`vi
`
`

`

`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT'D)
`
`Page
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`The ’490 Accused Products ....................................................................... 72
`
`Claim 31 ..................................................................................................... 73
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`g.
`
`A mobile terminal comprising: ...................................................... 73
`
`a modern timer; .............................................................................. 73
`
`a modern processor, the modem processor configured to hold
`modem processor to application processor data until expiration
`of the modern timer; .......................................................................73
`
`i.
`
`ii.
`
`Construction of “hold” ...................................................... 74
`
`Construction of “processor” .............................................. 76
`
`iii.
`
`InfringementAnalysrs 77
`
`an application processor;.-. ..............................................................78
`
`an interconneclivity bus communicatively coupling the
`application processor to the modem processor; and ...................... 78
`
`the application processor configured to hold application
`processor to modem processor data until the modem processor
`pulls data from the application processor after transmission of
`the modem processor to application processor data, .....................78
`
`wherein the modem processor is further configured [to] pull
`data from the application processor after transmission of the
`modem processor to application processor data and before the
`interconnectivity bus transitions from an active power state to
`a low power state. ..........................................................................79
`
`i.
`
`ii.
`
`Construction of “after" ...................................................... 80
`
`Infringement Analysis ....................................................... 82
`
`C.
`
`Technical Prong ..................................................................................................... 82
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`The ’490 Domestic industry Products ....................................................... 82
`
`Claim 31 ..................................................................................................... 83
`
`vii
`
`Intel Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated
`Intel Corporation V. Qualcomm Incorporated
`IPR2018-01240
`IPR2018-01240
`Exhibit 2001, p.8
`Exhibit 2001, p.8
`
`

`

`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`g.
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT’D)
`
`Page
`
`A mobile terminal comprising: ...................................................... 83
`
`a modern timer; .............................................................................. 83
`
`a modem processor, the modem processor configured to hold
`modem processor to application processor data until expiration
`of the modem timer; .......................................................................83
`
`an application processor,84
`
`an interconnectivity bus communicatively coupling the
`application processor to the modem processor; and ...................... 84
`
`the application processor configured to hold application
`processor to modern processor data until the modem processor
`pulls data from the application processor after transmission of
`the modern processor to application processor data, ..................... 85
`
`wherein the modem processor is further configured [to] pull
`data from the application processor after transmission of the
`modem processor to application processor data and before the
`interoonnectivity bus transitions from an active power state to
`a low power state. .......................................................................... 85
`
`D.
`
`Validity .................................................................................................................. 87
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Disclosure of Heinrich ............................................................................... 87
`
`Disclosure of Balasubramanian ................................................................. 90
`
`Heinrich and Balasubramanian: Obviousness ........................................... 91
`
`Secondary Considerations ..........................................................................94
`
`VI.
`
`Domestic Industry — Economic Prong ...............................................................................96
`
`A.
`
`B-
`
`General Principles of Law .....................................................................................96
`
`Qualcomm’s Domestic Industry Products .............................................................97
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`Qualcomm Chipsets ...................................................................................98
`
`Qualcomm Test Platforms ......................................................................... 98
`
`viii
`
`Intel Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated
`Intel Corporation V. Qualcomm Incorporated
`IPR2018-01240
`IPR2018—01240
`Exhibit 2001, p.9
`Exhibit 2001, p.9
`
`

`

`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT’D)
`
`Page
`
`C.
`
`Qualcomm’s Domestic Expenditures ....................................................................99
`
`l.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Qualcomm’s Engineering, Research and Development Group .........101
`
`Manufacturing .......................................................................................... 104
`
`Customer Engineering and Support ......................................................... 105
`
`Qualcomm’s Total Domestic Investment Per Patent ............................... 106
`
`D.
`
`Economic Prong Analysis .................................................................................... 107
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`Significant Investment in Plant and Equipment....................................... 108
`
`Significant Employment of Labor or Capital ........................................... 109
`
`The Significance of Qualcomm’s Investments ........................................ 110
`
`VII.
`
`Public Interest Considerations ........................................................................................ .114
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 14
`
`The Parties’ Public Interest Contentions .............................................................. 115
`
`l.
`
`Qualcomm’s Contentions......................................................................... 115
`
`a-
`
`b.
`
`The Focus of the Investigatiou: There Are Numerous
`Substitutes for the Accused Devices ............................................ 116
`
`Shifting the Focus to Intel’s Chipsets .......................................... 118
`
`i.
`
`ii.
`
`iii.
`
`iv.
`
`The Market ...................................................................... 120
`
`Existence of a Monopoly ................................................ 120
`
`Apple’s Domination ........................................................ 122
`
`Issuing the Exclusion Order Will Enhance
`Competition..................................................................... 123
`
`v.
`
`The Effect of an Exclusion Order on Intel ...................... 124
`
`vi.
`
`Will Intel Abandon 5G? .................................................. 125
`
`vii.
`
`Harm Is Avoidable .......................................................... 127
`
`ix
`
`Intel Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated
`Intel Corporation V. Qualcomm Incorporated
`IPR2018-01240
`1PR2018—01240
`Exhibit 2001, p.10
`Exhibit 2001, p.10
`
`

`

`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT’D)
`
`Page
`
`c.
`
`The Relevance of Past Qualcomm Actions ................................. 127
`
`2.
`
`Apple’s Contentions ................................................................................. 128
`
`a.
`
`Two Suppliers of Premium LTE Baseband Chipsets Is Better
`Than One Monopolist for CompetitiVe Conditions in the
`United States ................................................................................ 128
`
`i.
`
`ii.
`
`iii.
`
`The Premium Baseband Chipset Market Is the
`Critical Market That Would Be Impacted by the
`Proposed Exclusion Order .............................................. 128
`
`Intel and Qualcomm Are the Only Two Competitors
`for Sales in the Merchant Market for Premium
`
`Baseband Chipsets .......................................................... 130
`
`Competitive Conditions in the United States Are
`Better With Intel and Qualcomm Competing Than
`Under a Qualcomm Monopoly ....................................... 132
`
`b.
`
`The Proposed Exclusion Order Would Almost Certainly Cause
`Intel to Exit the Premium Baseband Chipset Market and Give
`Qualcomm a Monopoly ............................................................... 133
`
`i-
`
`ii.
`
`Qualcomm’s Arguments that Intel‘s Baseband
`Chipset Business Could Survive Quaicomm’s
`Proposed Exclusion Order Is Incorrect ........................... 13?
`
`No Other Premium LTE Baseband Chipset
`Suppliers Will Fill the Void if Intel Exits ....................... 142
`
`iii.
`
`If Intel Exits the Market for Premium LTE
`
`Baseband Chipsets, It Will Not Be a Competitor for
`SO Baseband Chipsets or Related Innovation
`
`145
`
`c.
`
`Intel’s Exit from Premium LTE and SG Chipsets Will Harm
`Competitive Conditions in the United States ............................... 147
`
`i.
`
`ii.
`
`A Qualcomm Monopoly Will Cause the Quality of
`Premium Baseband Chipsets to Decrease, and
`Prices to Increase ............................................................ 147
`
`A Qualcomm Monopoly in Premium Baseband
`Chipsets Would Stifle Intel’s Contributions to SG
`Intel Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated
`Intel Corporation V. Qualcomm Incorporated
`IPR2018-01240
`IPR2018-01240
`Exhibit 2001, p.11
`Exhibit 2001, p.11
`
`x
`
`

`

`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT’D)
`
`Page
`
`Standards and Innovation and Harm National
`
`Security ........................................................................... 148
`
`iii.
`
`If Intel’s Capacity to Contribute to the 5G
`Ecosystem Is Diminished, the Public Interest in
`U.S. Leadership in 5G Innovation Product Security
`Will Be Harmed .............................................................. 153
`
`d.
`
`An Exclusion Order Would Also Harm the Public Under
`Section 337's Other Public Interest Factors ................................. 154
`
`i.
`
`ii.
`
`iii.
`
`Harm to U.S. Smartphone Consumers ............................ 154
`
`Harm to U.S. Public Health and Welfare........................ 155
`
`Reduced Production of Directly Competitive
`Products in the United States .......................................... 156
`
`e.
`
`Denying an Exclusion Order 15 the Only Way to Protect the
`Public Interestl56
`
`i.
`
`The Staffs Posited SG “Carve-Out" Will Not
`Protect the Public Interest ............................................... 156
`
`ii.
`
`Qualcomm Will not Grant Intel a License ...................... 158
`
`f.
`
`Intel’s Exit Would Vitiate the FTC’s Efforts to Promote
`
`Premium-Baseband-Chipset Competition in the FTC’s Parallel
`Case Against Qualcomm.............................................................. 158
`
`g.
`
`The Harm to the Public Interest Substantially Outweighs any
`Countervailing Public Benefits from an Exclusion Order ........... 159
`
`3.
`
`The Staff’ 5 Contentions ........................................................................... 159
`
`a.
`
`Background: The Evolution of Cellular Standards and
`Technologies ................................................................................ 162
`
`i.
`
`ii.
`
`Early Smartphone Standards: ZG and 3G
`
`162
`
`The Current Standard:46 163
`
`iii.
`
`The Future Standard: SG 164
`
`xi
`
`Intel Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated
`Intel Corporation V. Qualcomm Incorporated
`IPR2018-01240
`IPR2018-01240
`Exhibit 2001, p.12
`Exhibit 2001, p.12
`
`

`

`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT’D)
`
`Page
`
`13.
`
`The Effect of a Remedy on the Mobile Electronic Devices
`Market .......................................................................................... 165
`
`i.
`
`ii.
`
`iii.
`
`iv-
`
`Public Health and Welfare .............................................. 166
`
`Competitive Conditions .................................................. 166
`
`Produetion of Like or Directly Competitive Articles
`
`168
`
`U.S. Consumers .............................................................. 168
`
`c.
`
`The Effect of a Remedy on the Baseband Processor Market....... 168
`
`i.
`
`ii.
`
`iii.
`
`iv.
`
`Public Health and Welfare .............................................. 1?1
`
`Competitive Conditions .................................................. 171
`
`Production of Like or Directly Competitive Articles ..... 180
`
`U.S. Consumers .............................................................. 181
`
`(11.
`
`Any Adverse Effect on the Public Interest Can Be Mitigated
`by Tailoring the Remedy Imposed to Exclude Products
`Incorporating SG Technology ...................................................... 183
`
`i.
`
`ii-
`
`Carve-Out for 50 Technology..............-......................... 186
`
`Exception for Research, Development, and Testing
`ofPrototypes 18?
`
`iii.
`
`Certification Provision .................................................... 189
`
`C.
`
`Findings................................................................................................................ 190
`
`VIII.
`
`Conclusions of Law .................................................-........................................................ 197
`
`IX.
`
`Initial Determination on Violation ................................................................................... 193
`
`Remedy and Bonding ....................................................................................................... 198
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`Limited Exclusion Order...................................................................................... 199
`
`Cease and Desist0rder199
`
`Bond.... .................................................................................................................201
`Intel Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated
`Intel Corporation V. Qualcomm Incorporated
`IPR2018-01240
`IPR2018-01240
`Exhibit 2001, p.13
`Exhibit 2001, p.13
`
`xii
`
`

`

`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT’D)
`
`Page
`
`X].
`
`Order ................................................................................................................................ 201
`
`Intel Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated
`Intel Corporation V. Qualcomm Incorporated
`IPR2018-01240
`IPR2018—01240
`Exhibit 2001, p.14
`Exhibit 2001, p.14
`
`

`

`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`The following abbreviations may be used in this Initial Determination:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`48
`
`Fourth Generation Cellular Standard
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
`
`
`
`
`- Complainant’sReplyPost-HearingBrief
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ALU
`
`CDX
`
`CFIUS
`
`CIB
`
`CPX
`
`CRPB
`
`CRSB
`
`CX
`
`DMA
`
`EDIS
`
`Arithmetic Logic Unit
`
`
`Complainant’s Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`
`
`
`Complainant’s Initial Post-Hearing Brief
`
`Complainant’s Physical Exhibit
`
`Complainant’s Responsive Post-Hearing Brief
`
`Complainant’s Exhibit
`
`Deposition
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Electronic Document Imaging System
`
`
`Execution State Load
`ESL
`I
`
`
`ET
`
`
`Envelope Tracking
`
`GPU
`
`
`
`Graphics Processing Unit
`
`
`IoT
`Internet of Things
`
`IPC
`
`
`
`
`Interprocessor Communication
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.lDX
`
`Joint Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`
`
`.
`XIV
`
`Intel Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated
`Intel Corporation V. Qualcomm Incorporated
`IPR2018-01240
`IPR2018—01240
`Exhibit 2001, p.15
`Exhibit 2001, p.15
`
`

`

`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`
`
`
`
` JPX Joint Physical Exhibit
`
`IX
`
`LTE
`
`Joint Exhibit
`
`Long Term Evolution, a Fourth Generation (46)
`Wireless Standard
`
`
`
`MTP